Economic efficiency of sanitary treatment of milking equipment using ecologically safe detergent-sanitizers Sanimol L and Sanimol K
The increase of microbiological indicators of milk quality as a result of sanitary treatment of milking and dairy equipment of new detergents Sanimol L and Sanimol K. A direct calculation of the difference in the cost. The annual economic effect.
Рубрика | Сельское, лесное хозяйство и землепользование |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 29.06.2022 |
Размер файла | 21,2 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Economic efficiency of sanitary treatment of milking equipment using ecologically safe detergent-sanitizers Sanimol L and Sanimol K
Kryvokhyzha Ye.1, Osadchuk V.2
Institute of agroecology and nature management of NAAS, 12 Metrolohichna Str., Kyiv, 03143, Ukraine,
2Bukovyna State agricultural research Station of the Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS, 21A
Bohdana Kryzhanivskoho Str., Chernivtsi, 58026, Ukraine;
Goal. To determine the economic efficiency of sanitation of milking and dairy equipment with the use of new detergents Sanimol L and Sanimol K. Methods. General scientific methods are used: analysis and synthesis, comparison, and theoretical generalization. A direct calculation of the difference in the cost of similar funds is also made. Results. It is determined that the total estimated economic effect per 100 lactating cows during sanitation of 5 portable milking machines three times a day and milk cooler once a day with Sanimol L and Sanimol K during the year will be UAH 21,097 compared to CircoSuper AF and Sidmax. The economic effect obtained due to the increase of microbiological indicators of milk quality as a result of sanitary treatment of milking equipment with Sanimol L and Sanimol K is calculated for 100 cows for 3 times milking with portable milking machines. The milk yield for one lactating cow was 4,500 kg/ year. Before the introduction of sanitary treatment of milking equipment with Sanimol L and Sanimol K, the farm received the grade I milk which worth 8.4 UAH/kg. The use of these preparations made it possible to obtain and deliver milk to the processing plant of the extra grade for 9.8 UAH/kg. Annual economic effect -- UAH 624097.2. Conclusions. The use of Sanimol L for sanitary treatment of milking equipment is 1.3 - 1.8 times more cost-effective compared to CircoSuper AF, and Sanimol K -- 3.8 - 4 times more than Sidmax. The annual economic effect due to the use of Sanimol L and Sanimol K for sanitation of milking equipment and dairy equipment on dairy farms with a population of 100 cows will amount to UAH 624097.2.
Key words: cost calculation, costs, microbiological indicators, milk grade.
Upon receipt of milk basic source of its microbial contamination is insufficiently cleaned milking equipment [1]. The remains of milk and water for rinsing on internal surfaces milking and dairy equipment support the development of microorganisms [2]. Insufficient cleaning and disinfection of milking and dairy equipment allows microorganisms remain, reproduce and grow on their internal surfaces. This results to increase of number of microorganisms in milk [3]. An important condition for receipt of milk of sort extra is the use to sanitizing milking equipment of cleaning- disinfecting agents providing its proper cleanliness in accord with uniform norm with numbers of microbes of wash off up to 500 CFU/cm3 [4]. At the same time besides ensuring the normative cleanliness of milking and dairy equipment cleaning-disinfecting agents must have such competitive advantages as: ecological safety and a little lower cost compared with analogical products. Taking this into account, determination of economic efficiency use cleaning-disinfecting agents to sanitizing milking equipment is one of the important tasks.
Analysis of recent research and publications. Creating of cleaning-disinfecting agents to sanitizing of milking and dairy equipment were engaged in A.G. Khramtsov [5], J. Berard [6], F. Gelmi [7] et al. Questions related to assessment of effectiveness of cleaning-disinfecting agents to sanitizing of milking equipment reflected in the study of such scientists as: N.N. Laushkina [8], M.M. Karpenya [9], M.A. Sergeeva [10], A.R. Monken [11] et al. However, in scientific literature enough little attention is paid to such question, as determination of economic efficiency of using of cleaning-disinfecting agents to sanitizing of milking equipment.
Goal of researches. Determination of economic efficiency of sanitizing of milking and dairy equipment at application of new cleaning-disinfecting agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K.
Materials and methods of researches. In preparing of article following general scientific methods were used, as analysis and synthesis (when determining of cost of sanitizing of milking equipment when using of cleaning- disinfecting agents), comparisons (to determine more economically of effective agents) and theoretical generalization (applied for formulation of conclusions).
Economic efficiency of application of agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K to sanitizing of milking equipment were determined of the difference of cost of analogical agents and by calculation the increases of microbiological indexes of quality of milk obtained as a result of realization of sanitizing of milking equipment by these agents.
Results of researches. Calculation of cost of sanitizing of milking equipment when using agents of Sanimol L and Sanimol K have conducted in comparative aspects to available on the Ukrainian market agents, in particular CircoSuper AF and Sidmax. Analysis of price lists of different firms on realization of cleaning-disinfecting agents on 1.02.2020 showed that price of CircoSuper AF, on average, is 36 hrivnas and Sidmax - 100.0 hrivnas. The cost of agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K is 20 and 25 hrivnas respectively.
First of all, were conducted calculation of the value of alkaline agents. For sanitizing of portable milking machines, cost of preparation 100 liters of 0.7% of working solution of agent of Sanimol L is 14.0 hrivnas. The cost of preparation 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of agent of CircoSuper AF - 18.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 4.0 hrivnas (18-14). Expenses on sanitizing of the five portable milking machines the agent Sanimol L is 1.4 hrivnas and the agent CircoSuper AF - 1.8 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of the five portable milking machines the agent Sanimol L at milking three times a day throughout the year is1533.0 hrivnas and CircoSuper AF - 1971.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency when applying for sanitizing of milking equipment of agent Sanimol L throughout the year was 438.0 hrivnas (Table 1).
1. Cost of one sanitizing of milking equipment with alkaline agents
Name of the agent |
The concentration, % |
The quantity of working solution, liters |
The cost of sanitizing, hrivnas |
|||
five portable milking machines |
milk pipeline |
milk cooler |
||||
Sanimol L |
0.7 |
10 |
1.4 |
- |
- |
|
0.5 |
100 |
- |
10 |
- |
||
1.0 |
50 |
- |
- |
10 |
||
CircoSuper AF |
0.5 |
10 |
1.8 |
- |
- |
|
100 |
- |
18 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
50 |
- |
- |
18 |
For sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline, cost of preparation 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of agent of Sanimol L is 10.0 hrivnas and 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of analogical agent - 18.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency will be - 8.0 hrivnas (18.0-10.0). Expenses on sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline the agent Sanimol L is 10.0 hrivnas and the agent CircoSuper AF - 18.0 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline at milking three times a day throughout the year is 10950.0 hrivnas and 19710.0 hrivnas respectively. Economic efficiency is 8760.0 hrivnas (Table 2).
2. Cost of using alkaline agents for sanitizing of milking equipment throughout the year
Name of the agent |
The concentration, % |
The quantity of working solution, thousands liters |
The cost of sanitizing, thousands hrivnas |
|||
five portable milking machines |
milk pipeline |
milk cooler |
||||
Sanimol L |
0.7 |
11.0 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
|
0.5 |
109.5 |
- |
11.0 |
- |
||
1.0 |
54.8 |
- |
- |
11.0 |
||
CircoSuper AF |
0.5 |
11.0 |
2.0 |
- |
- |
|
109.5 |
- |
19.7 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
54.8 |
- |
- |
19.7 |
For sanitizing of milk cooler, cost of preparation 100 liters of 1.0% of working solution of agent of Sanimol L is 20.0 hrivnas. The cost of preparation 100 liters of 1.0% of working solution of agent of CircoSuper AF - 36.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 16.0 hrivnas (36.0-20.0). Expenses on sanitizing of milk cooler 10.0 hrivnas and 18.0 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of milk cooler throughout the year is 3650.0 hrivnas and 6570.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 2920.0 hrivnas.
Thus, the general supposed economic effect on 100 lactating cows when sanitizing of five portable milking machines three times per day and milk cooler once a day agent of Sanimol L in a year will be 3358.0 hrivnas.
Calculated cost of the application of acidic agents for sanitizing of portable milking machines. Preparation of 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of agent of Sanimol K costs 12.5 hrivnas. The cost of preparation 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of agent of Sidmax - 50.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 37.5 hrivnas (50.0-12.5). Expenses on sanitizing of the five portable milking machines the agent Sanimol K is 1.3 hrivnas and the agent Sidmax - 5,0 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of the five portable milking machines the agent Sanimol K at milking three times a day throughout the year is1423.5 hrivnas and the agent Sidmax - 5475.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency when applying for sanitizing of milking equipment of agent Sanimol K throughout the year was 4051.5 hrivnas (Table 3).
3. Cost of one sanitizing of milking equipment with acid agents
Name of the agent |
The concentration, % |
The quantity of working solution, liters |
The cost of sanitizing, hrivnas |
|||
five portable milking machines |
milk pipeline |
milk cooler |
||||
Sanimol K |
0.5 |
10 |
1.3 |
- |
- |
|
100 |
- |
12.5 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
50 |
- |
- |
12.5 |
||
Sidmax |
0.5 |
10 |
5.0 |
- |
- |
|
100 |
- |
50.0 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
50 |
- |
- |
50.0 |
For sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline, cost of preparation 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of agent of Sanimol K is12.5 hrivnas and 100 liters of 0.5% of working solution of analogical agent is 50.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency will be - 37.5 hrivnas (50.0-12.5). Expenses on sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline the agent Sanimol K is 12.5 hrivnas and the agent Sidmax - 50.0 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of milking installation with milk pipeline at milking three times a day throughout the year is 13687.5 hrivnas and 54750.0 hrivnas respectively. Economic efficiency is 41062.5 hrivnas (Table 4).
4. Cost of using acidic agents for sanitizing of milking equipment throughout the year
Name of the agent |
The concentration, % |
The quantity of working solution, thousands liters |
The cost of sanitizing, thousands hrivnas |
|||
five portable milking machines |
milk pipeline |
milk cooler |
||||
Sanimol K |
0.5 |
11.0 |
1.4 |
- |
- |
|
109.5 |
- |
13.7 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
54.8 |
- |
- |
13.7 |
||
Sidmax |
0.5 |
11.0 |
5.5 |
- |
- |
|
109.5 |
- |
54.8 |
- |
|||
1.0 |
54.8 |
- |
- |
54.8 |
For sanitizing of milk cooler, cost of preparation 100 liters of 1.0% of working solution of agent of Sanimol K is 25.0 hrivnas. The cost of preparation 100 liters of 1.0% of working solution of agent of Sidmax - 100.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 75.0 hrivnas (100.0-25.0). Expenses on sanitizing of milk cooler is 12.5 hrivnas and 50.0 hrivnas. Expenses on sanitizing of milk cooler throughout the year is 4562.5 hrivnas and 18250.0 hrivnas. Economic efficiency is 13687.5 hrivnas.
Thus, the general supposed economic effect on 100 lactating cows when sanitizing of five portable milking machines three times per day and milk cooler once a day agent of Sanimol K in a year will be 17739.0 hrivnas.
Economic efficiency of application of agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K was calculated on 100 cows at three times milking by portable milking machines. Milk yield per lactating cow was 4500 kg per year. On the farm before the introduction of sanitizing of milking and dairy equipment by agents of Sanimol L and Sanimol K received milk first class by a cost a 8.4 hrivnas per 1 kg. The use of these agents allowed to get and deliver milk to the processing plant sort extra, at a cost of 1 kg - 9.8 hrivnas.
The economic effect a consequence of improved microbiological indicators of quality of freshly milked milk as a result of realization of sanitizing of milking equipment agents of Sanimol L and Sanimol K (Es) was calculated according to the formula:
Es = Qm x (P, - P2) - Es (1)
where: Qm - quantity of freshly milked milk of sort extra, (kg);
Pi and P2 - prices on realization obtained of milk extra and first sorts respectively, (hrivnas);
Es - expenses on realization of sanitizing of milking machines, milk containers and milk cooler, (hrivnas).
Es = 450000.0 x (9.8 - 8.4) - 5902.8 = 624097.2 hrivnas.
The annual economic effect as the result of using agents of Sanimol L and Sanimol K to sanitize of milking and dairy equipment on dairy farms with number of 100 cows will be 624097.2 hrivnas.
sanitary treatment dairy equipment milk quality microbiological
Conclusion
Determined the economic efficiency of application of new agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K to sanitizing of milking equipment. The general supposed economic effect when used cleaning-disinfecting agents Sanimol L and Sanimol K for milking installation with milk pipeline three times per day and milk cooler once a day in a year will be 66430.0 hrivnas compared to CircoSuper AF and Sidmax. It is established, that application of agent of Sanimol L is economically advantageous by 1.3-1.8 times compared with CircoSuper AF. Use of agent of Sanimol L by 3.8-4.0 times cheaper relative to Sidmax. The annual economic effect as the result of using agents of Sanimol L and Sanimol K to sanitize of milking equipment on dairy farms with number of 100 cows will be 624097.2 hrivnas.
References
1. Robinson, R.K. (2002). Dairy microbiology handbook: the microbiology of milk and milk products. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
2. Murphy, S.C., & Boor, K.J. (2000). Trouble-shooting sources and causes of high bacteria counts in raw milk. Dairy, Food and Environmental Sanitation, 20 (8), 606-611.
3. Bava, L. Zucali, M., Brasca, M., Zanini, L., Sandrucci, A. (2009). Efficiency of cleaning procedure of milking equipment and bacterial quality of milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 2, 387-389.
4. Laiter-Moskaliuk, S.V., Reshetnyk, A.O., Horiuk, V.V., & Perkii, Yu.B. (2016). Rozrobka rezhymiv sanitarnoi obrobky doilnoho ustatkuvannia kyslotnym zasobom «TDS» [Development of modes of milking equipment sanitization with the help of «TDS» acid detergent-sanitizer]. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 18, 1 (65), 2, 188-192. [In Ukrainian].
5. Khramtsov, A.G., Anisimov, G.S., Anisimov, S.V., Serov, A.V., Blinov, A.V., & Blinova, A.A. Patent. no. 2654465 C1 Russian Federation, MPK(2006. 01) C11D 1/62, C11D 1/66, C07F 1/10, C11D 3/384. Moyushche- dezinfitsiruyushchee sredstvo dlya predpriyatiy molochnoy promyshlennosti [Detergent sanitizer for dairy companies]; Applicant and Patent Attorney Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "North Caucasian Federal University"; no. 2017119808; stated 06.06.2017; posted by 18.05.2018. 12 p. [In Russian].
6. Berard, J., Bardoneschi, G., Bechenne, L., & Laroche, B. Patent World Intellectual Property Organization no. WO 91/18080, IPC C11D 3/06, 1/02. Mixture for cleaning and disinfecting milking equipment; Applicant and Patent Attorney Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien; no. PCT/EP91/00846; stated 06.05.1991; posted by 28.11.1991. 15 p.
7. Gelmi, F., & Venturin,i M. European patent no. EP 2 915 874 A1, IPC (2006. 01) C11D 3/395, C11D 3/04, C11D 3/08, C11D 3/12. № 14157434.3. Composition for washing and sanitizing food production plants; Applicant and Patent Attorney I.C.F S.r.l. 26020 Palazzo Pignano; no. 14157434.3; stated 03.03.2014 ; posted by 09.09.2015. 8 p.
8. Laushkina, N.N., & Surkov, R.A. (2017). Otsenka sanitarno-bakteriologicheskogo sostoyaniya doilnykh apparatov pri ispolzovanii moyushche-dezinfitsiruyushchikh sredstv marki «Katril» i Rom-fos [Evaluation of sanitary- bacteriological condition of milking machines when use washing and disinfectants-brand "Catril" and Rom-phos]. Bulletin of Orel State Agrarian University, 3 (66), 104-109. [In Russian].
9. Karpenya, M.M., Podrez, V.N., Karpenya, A.M., & Shaura, T.A. (2018). Effektivnost ispolzovaniya raznykh moyushche-dezinfitsiruyushchikh sredstv pri proizvodstve dobrokachestvennogo moloka [Efficiency of different detergents and disinfectants in the production of quality milk]. Scientific notes of the educational institution Vitebsk State Academy of Veterinary Medicine, 54, 4, 164-168. [In Russian].
10. Sergeeva, M.A., & Shchiptsova, N.V. (2017). Effektivnost ispolzovaniya dezinfitsiruyushchikh sredstv pri proizvodstve kachestvennogo syrogo moloka [Efficiency of using desinfectants in qualitaty raw milk production]. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 6 (152), 122-126. [In Russian].
11. Monken, A.R. Patent United States no. US 6,472,199 B1, IPC C12S 9/00. Method of cleaning dairy pipelines using enzyme pretreatment; Applicant and Patent Attorney West Agro, Inc.; no. 09.1825,749; stated 04.04.2001; posted by 29.10.2002. 5 p.
12. Vinokurov, V.V. (1982). Sostoyanie i perspektivy ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy v veterinarii [The state and prospects of economic research in veterinary medicine]. Moscow: All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Information and Technical-Economic Research on Agriculture. [In Russian].
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
The nature and terms of the specialization of agricultural enterprises. The dynamics of the production of corn for grain. Deepening of specialization and improve production efficiency. The introduction of mechanization and advanced technologies.
курсовая работа [67,7 K], добавлен 13.05.2015World forest region map. Deforestation as the conversion of forest land to non-forest land for use (arable land, pasture). Effect of destruction of large areas of forest cover on the environment and reduce biodiversity. The methods of forest management.
презентация [1,4 M], добавлен 06.05.2012The production technology of dairy industry products, main sources of wastes and ways of its utilization. Description of milk processing. Waste generating processes. Handling of by-products and treatment of waste. Waste reduction. Economic considerations.
курсовая работа [528,7 K], добавлен 23.10.2012The steady legal connection of the person with the state, expressing in aggregate of legal rights and duties. The Maastricht Treaty of 1992. Establishment of the European Economic Community. Increase of the number of rights given to the citizens.
реферат [22,5 K], добавлен 13.02.2015Principles and types of screening. Medical equipment used in screening. identify The possible presence of an as-yet-undiagnosed disease in individuals without signs or symptoms. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment. Common screening programmes.
презентация [921,2 K], добавлен 21.02.2016General structure of a river petroleum storage depot. Calculation of reservoirs capacity for fuel storage, selecting of reservoirs type, its equipment. Selection of fuel purification means. Equipment for fuel distributing and distributing process itself.
контрольная работа [4,7 M], добавлен 17.11.2014The essence of economic efficiency and its features determination in grain farming. Methodology basis of analysis and efficiency of grain. Production resources management and use. Dynamics of grain production. The financial condition of the enterprise.
курсовая работа [70,0 K], добавлен 02.07.2011Economic growth and potential of economic system. The main problems of productive forces in Ukraine. Modern approaches to productivity. Productivity growth in industries. Improvements in infrastructure quality Support of employment of the population.
курсовая работа [15,3 K], добавлен 09.05.2011Overview history of company and structure of organization. Characterization of complex tasks and necessity of automation. Database specifications and system security. The calculation of economic efficiency of the project. Safety measures during work.
дипломная работа [1009,6 K], добавлен 09.03.2015Environmental standard. Economic regulation of protection environment. The prices for the energy, existing ecological standards and more effective productions. The ecological nature of Technology of mass-media and the equipment of technological processes.
реферат [12,8 K], добавлен 18.03.2009Calculation of accounting and economic profits. The law of diminishing returns. Short-Run production relationships and production costs, it's graphic representation. The long-run cost curve. Average fixed, variable, total costs and marginal costs.
презентация [66,7 K], добавлен 19.10.2016Negative consequences proceeding in real sector of economy. Social stratification in a society. Estimation of efficiency of economic safety. The parity of the manufacturers of commodity production. Main problems of the size of pension of common people.
статья [15,4 K], добавлен 12.04.2012Defining the role of developed countries in the world economy and their impact in the political, economic, technical, scientific and cultural spheres.The level and quality of life. Industrialised countries: the distinctive features and way of development.
курсовая работа [455,2 K], добавлен 27.05.2015The value of domestic tourism for the Russian economy: an increase in jobs in hotels, restaurants, food industry and transport. Stages of development of domestic tourism in post-revolutionary and Soviet periods. Treatment, athletic and business tourism.
реферат [20,0 K], добавлен 04.03.2012Economic system. List by hands-on and hands-off. Types of economic systems. Market economy. Mixed economy. Planned economy. Traditional economy. Participatory economics. Changes of an economic situation in Russia. Recent economic developments.
реферат [15,0 K], добавлен 27.05.2007Etiology and pathogenesis, types, treatment of pulpits. Inflammation of dental pulp. An infection (microorganisms) which penetrats in the cavity of pulp chamber. Test of healthy pulp. Tapping of tooth directly. Root canal treatment. Tooth extraction.
презентация [851,9 K], добавлен 31.05.2016The economic benefits to the recipient countries by providing capital, foreign exchange. The question of potential causality between foreign debt and domestic savings in the context of the Kyrgyz Republic. The problem of tracking new private businesses.
реферат [26,7 K], добавлен 28.01.2014General characteristic of the LLC DTEK Zuevskaya TPP and its main function. The history of appearance and development of the company. Characteristics of the organizational management structure. Analysis of financial and economic performance indicators.
отчет по практике [4,2 M], добавлен 22.05.2015Air pollution. Deforestation. Acid rain. The "Green House Effect". Water pollution. Toxic waste pollution. Environmental movements. Rates of deforestation. Carbon Dioxide Emissions per Units of Economic Output. Increase of global surface temperature.
курсовая работа [51,8 K], добавлен 13.05.2005The influence of the movement of refugees to the economic development of host countries. A description of the differences between forced and voluntary migration from the point of view of economic, political consequences. Supply in the labor markets.
статья [26,6 K], добавлен 19.09.2017