Replacement of soybean meal with sunflower one in the diet of broiler chickens and its influence on their growth and development
Analyze the influence of replacement of soy with protein sunflower concentrate in the diets for broiler chickens and to evaluate the effect of this ingredient on the growth and development of poultry. Review of indicators of the meat productivity index.
Рубрика | Сельское, лесное хозяйство и землепользование |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 05.09.2022 |
Размер файла | 72,1 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
State Poultry Research Station of NAAS
Replacement of soybean meal with sunflower one in the diet of broiler chickens and its influence on their growth and development
Havilei O., Pankova S., Katerynych O., Poliakova L.
20 Tsentralna Str., Borki vill., Zmievsky district, Kharkiv oblast, 63421, Ukraine
Goal. To analyze the influence of replacement of soy with protein sunflower concentrate in the diets for broiler chickens and to evaluate the effect of this ingredient on the growth and development of poultry. Methods. The experiment was conducted on broiler chickens of cross Cobb 500 for fattening from 1-day age to 42-days age. 3 groups of 50 chickens were formed, which were fed with rations where soy components were replaced with protein sunflower concentrate at the levels: 0% (control group), 45% (experimental group 1), and 70% (experimental group 2). Feed consumption and bird death were recorded daily, and the live weight of the bird was monitored weekly. At the end of the experiment, the slaughter qualities of broilers were evaluated. Results. The addition of protein sunflower concentrate to the diets of broiler chickens (crude protein level -- 44.4%) did not negatively influence their growth and development, but on the contrary, increased the final live weight by 20.3% (experimental group 2). Replacement of soybeans with this ingredient at the level of 45% (experimental group 1) did not significantly affect feed conversion, live weight dynamics, and slaughter qualities of chickens. Increasing the level of replacement to 70% (experimental group 2) contributed to the improvement of poultry productivity -- the average daily increase in live weight exceeded this index in other groups by 19.4 - 20.9%. The yield of the gutted carcass in the group with 70% soybean substitution for sunflower was 5.5% higher than in the control (without sunflower) and in the experimental group 1 (45% soybean replacement with sunflower) -- 73.1%, against 67.6 - 67.7%. Feed costs per 1 kg of growth in the experimental group 2 were lower by 14.8 - 15.3% (1.61 kg). The meat productivity index for the diet with a 70% replacement of soy with sunflower protein concentrate was 322.5. Conclusions. Taking into account productivity indicators (increase in live weight and intensity of its growth, improved feed conversion, increased gut carcass yield) and technological efficiency of fattening, it is recommended to replace up to 70% of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate in broiler diets.
Key words: poultry feeding, protein sunflower concentrate, live weight, meat productivity index.
Introduction
The main reserve for reducing the cost of feed, and, accordingly, the cost of livestock products, is the reduction in the cost of the protein component of the diet. An alternative to traditional, expensive poultry feeds can be cheaper, more affordable and nutritious substitutes - agricultural by-products. Recently, the world began to use sunflower processing products as an alternative source of protein in poultry diets and replace soybean meal with them [1].
Sunflower processing products, which are produced in sufficient quantities in all climatic zones of Ukraine, are the largest source of feed protein. According to physiological experiments, it was found that for broiler chickens the energy value of this product ranged from 218.5 - 284.2 kcal / 100 g [2]. Unfortunately, a number of factors, namely: insufficient complete protein, significant excess of fiber, low content of some essential amino acids, in particular lysine, the ability to accumulate chlorogenic acid, limit the use of sunflower in animal feeding [3].
At the same time, the main and decisive factor in the use of sunflower processing products in animal husbandry is the reasonable price of oilseed feed protein. In addition, technologies for enrichment of sunflower meal have been developed, which allow increasing the protein level to 40 - 44%, and reducing the fiber level to 8 - 10%. With such a dramatic improvement in nutritional value, the cost of the supplement will increase by only 20 - 40% [4].
One of the leading producers of sunflower meal in Ukraine - the Potoki oil extraction plant (Dnipro), using modern technology for additional mechanical processing of this product, produces high-protein sunflower concentrate, which significantly differs from the original meal in terms of protein and energy nutritional value (the manufacturer declared the level of crude protein - 44.4%, metabolizable energy - 228 kcal/100 g).
Taking this into account, sunflower protein is now considered all over the world as the main means of enriching the diet of pigs, livestock, and poultry with crude protein [5 - 7]. However, there is still no consensus on the levels of addition of these products to poultry feed.
In laying hens receiving feed, where the level of sunflower meal was 20%, there was no significant effect on egg production, egg weight and quality, as well as the antioxidant status of poultry, but feed consumption decreased. Therefore, the authors suggest that partial or complete replacement of soybean meal with this product will reduce production costs. Moreover, feeding the laying hens with feed with the addition of sunflower reduces the cholesterol content in the yolk of eggs [8].
At the same time, studies on turkeys during rearing for meat indicate that the presence of sunflower meal at the level of 7% in the diets did not have a negative effect on the digestibility of feed nutrients, the physiological state of the bird and its live weight. A twofold and threefold increase in the concentration of this product led to a decrease in the live weight of turkeys at the age of 8 weeks by 4 and 6%, respectively [9].
In experiments on waterfowl [10], it was recorded that live weight, feed conversion, as well as egg production of geese and ducks did not change significantly even with 100% replacement of soybean meal with sunflower meal, but subject to the addition of synthetic amino acids and energy supplements.
Most studies on broilers indicate that sunflower meal may well be an alternative to soy in poultry diets, since it does not negatively affect their performance and physiological state. In the experiments of Sangsoponjit et al. [11] the addition of sunflower meal to feed at the level of 4%, 8% and 12% did not affect live weight, feed consumption and its conversion and broiler safety. The same applies to carcass yield and abdominal fat. The best European Broiler Efficiency Index was obtained for the addition of 8% sunflower meal to the diet.
The research results Alagawany et al. [12] show that sunflower meal can be advantageously used up to 20% instead of soybean meal without significantly affecting the growth rate of broiler chickens, their consumption of feed and its conversion.
In other studies, when assessing the effect of replacing soybean meal with sunflower at the level of 25%, 50, 75% on the growth rates of broilers, their meat quality and their absorption of nutrients, it was found that increasing the level of substitution up to 50% also increased the live weight of chickens. There was also an improvement in feed conversion in the groups receiving the diet with 25 and 50% substitution of soybeans for sunflower compared to the control. The authors recommend the use of up to 50% sunflower meal in the diets of broilers aged 7 - 42 days without the use of additional enzymes [13].
Waititu et al. [14] also found that high-protein sunflower meal can be substituted for up to 50% of soybean meal in broiler chickens' diets without deteriorating growth performance in both the initial and final phases. When replacing 75% of the soybeans, the authors believe that adding enzymes is beneficial; this may alleviate the growth depression associated with feeding.
In a similar experiment, raising the level of sunflower meal in the diets to 50% instead of soybean meal improved the growth performance of broilers. An even higher level of sunflower (75%) improved nutrient absorption but negatively affected growth performance and feed utilization in birds [15]. So, there is no unanimous judgment regarding the levels of sunflower-soy substitution in broiler feed.
Therefore, our research was aimed at analyzing the possible levels of replacement of soybean meal in broiler chicken diets with protein sunflower concentrate without compromising the productivity and safety of the poultry.
The goal of the study was to determine the effect of protein sunflower concentrate on the growth and development of broiler chickens at different levels of its feeding in the feed.
Materials and research methods. The study was conducted at the experimental farm "Conservation of the gene pool of domestic birds" State Poultry Research Station HAAH on broiler chickens Cobb 500. From day-old birds 3 randomized groups of 50 birds each were formed (table. 1).
Table 1. Scheme of the experiment on feeding the protein sunflower concentrate to broiler chickens
Bird group |
Feeding characteristic |
|
Control (C) |
Basic feed with the addition of soy components: 35% from the 1st to the 10th day of growing, 32% - from the 11th to the 24th day, 27% - from the 25th to the 42nd day |
|
Experimental 1st (E1) |
Feed with the replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate: 14% from the 1st to the 10th day of growing, 32% - from the 11th to the 24th day, 60% - from the 25th to 42nd day (on average for the growing period, the replacement of soybeans with sunflower is 45%) |
|
Experimental 2nd (E2) |
Feed with replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate: 14% from 1st to 10th days of growing, 45% from 11th to 24th days, 90% from 25th to 42nd days (on average, replacement of soybeans with sunflower during the growing period is 70%) |
One of the groups was the control group (C), in which the chickens received feed based on soybean meal and meal without the addition of sunflower, the other 2 - experimental groups (E1 and E2), in which the chickens were fed food with different levels of replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate produced Potoki Ltd. Therefore, 3 experimental diets were formed, which included protein sunflower concentrate as a substitute for soy components at the levels of 0%, 45 and 70%. Experimental diets were isoenergetic and isoprotein, balanced in all nutrients, free of feed antibiotics and other growth stimulants and depended on the phase of development of the birds (Table 2). With an increase in the amount of sunflower concentrate in the diet, lysine was additionally introduced, which is not enough in this product.
Table 2. Ingredients and nutritional value of experimental diets for broiler chickens according to age
Indicators |
Poultry group depending on the level of soybean substitution PSC1 |
|||||||||
start (1-10 days) |
growth (11-24 days) |
finish (25-42 days) |
||||||||
C |
E1 |
E2 |
C |
E1 |
E2 |
C |
E1 |
E2 |
||
Content of dietary components, % |
||||||||||
Wheat |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
7.9 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
|
Corn |
45 |
45 |
45 |
52.4 |
52.5 |
52.5 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
|
Soybean cake |
10 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
16.2 |
25.3 |
9.9 |
0 |
|
Soybean meal |
24.9 |
19.6 |
19.6 |
12.3 |
1.7 |
0 |
1.7 |
0 |
0 |
|
О CO CL |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
23.8 |
|
Bone flour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Fish flour |
5.04 |
5.03 |
5.03 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Meat and bone meal |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2.5 |
2.51 |
2.5 |
|
Sunflower oil |
1.2 |
1.45 |
1.45 |
1.16 |
1.6 |
1.99 |
1.43 |
2.8 |
3.66 |
|
Lysine |
0.22 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.23 |
0.38 |
0.46 |
0.21 |
0.44 |
0.58 |
|
Methionine |
0.32 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.29 |
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.24 |
0.19 |
0.16 |
|
Threonine |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.07 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
|
Salt |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.08 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
0.11 |
0.1 |
0.12 |
|
a piece of chalk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.17 |
0.17 |
0.17 |
|
Monocalcium Phosphate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.17 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
|
A mixture of vitamins and minerals |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Nutritional value of feed |
||||||||||
Exchange energy, kcal/100g |
300 |
300 |
300 |
310 |
310 |
310 |
320 |
320 |
320 |
|
Crude protein,% |
24.4 |
24.4 |
24.4 |
21.5 |
21.5 |
21.5 |
19.3 |
19.3 |
19.3 |
|
Crude fat,% |
5.06 |
5.33 |
5.33 |
5.42 |
5.9 |
6.1 |
6.08 |
6.68 |
7.03 |
|
Crude fiber,% |
3.53 |
3.59 |
3.59 |
3.35 |
3.48 |
3.58 |
3.00 |
3.32 |
3.51 |
|
Calcium |
1.22 |
1.22 |
1.22 |
0.88 |
0.88 |
0.88 |
0.80 |
0.78 |
0.78 |
|
Phosphorus assimilable |
0.59 |
0.59 |
0.59 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
0.44 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.43 |
|
Linoleic acid |
2.09 |
2.26 |
2.26 |
2.43 |
2.74 |
2.9 |
2.83 |
3.34 |
3.65 |
|
Lysine |
1.28 |
1.28 |
1.28 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
1.01 |
1.01 |
1.01 |
|
Methionine |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.58 |
0.57 |
0.57 |
0.51 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
|
Methionine + cystine |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
0.79 |
0.79 |
0.79 |
|
Threonine |
0.86 |
0.86 |
0.86 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.67 |
0.67 |
0.67 |
1PSC - protein sunflower concentrate
The poultry was raised for 42 days with floor keeping and free access to water and feed in compliance with the recommended technological parameters. Chickens were vaccinated against Marek and Gumboro disease at one day of age, against Newcastle disease on time in the first rearing period.
Control weighing of chickens was carried out weekly in the context of groups. The amount of given feed and its residues were weighed daily, and the mortality of the bird was also taken into account. As a result, the dynamics of the live weight of chickens, its growth over the rearing periods, as well as the feed costs per head and 1 kg of live weight gain, and the safety of poultry in each group were assessed. At the end of the experiment at the age of 42 days, five birds from each group were selected at random for slaughter and carcass evaluation, the carcass yield was calculated as a percentage of the pre-slaughter weight of broilers.
Based on the results of the experiment, we calculated the efficiency of using compound feeds in feeding broiler chickens with a partial replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate using the European index of meat productivity, which reflects such important indicators as live weight, safety and feed costs, according to the formula:
where EIMP is the European index of meat productivity, points; LW - average live weight, kg; S - safety of livestock,%; DG - duration of growth, days; FC - feed costs per 1 kg of gain, kg.
All data obtained were statistically processed, the difference between the diets was determined using the Tukey test.
Results and its discussion
In the course of the research, it was found that the safety of the livestock for 42 days in the control and the E2 group was equally high and amounted to 98%, in the E1 group this indicator was 92%. However, the reasons for this difference (trauma, Marek's disease) were not related to the subject of the experiment.
The obtained weighing data indicate that the replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate contributed to a significant increase in comparison with the control of the live weight of broilers in both groups receiving a diet with this component, in the first period (1-3 weeks) - by 6.6-15.7% in the group E1 and 10.1-25.8% in the group E2 (Table 3).
Table 3 Dynamics of live weight of broiler chickens at different levels of use in the diet of sunflower concentrate, g
Poultry age, weeks |
Poultry group depending on the level of soybean substitution PSC |
|||
C (0%) |
E1 (45%) |
E2 (70%) |
||
day |
51.2±0.54 |
50.7±0.58 |
50.9±0.51 |
|
1 |
159.8±2.23 |
170.3±2.56b |
176.0±2.33c |
|
2 |
387.8±8.40 |
430.2±9.83b |
468.6±8.85c |
|
3 |
694.1±15.97 |
802.9±16.71c |
873.1±23.12c |
|
4 |
1150.1±30.45 |
1167.7±27.75а |
1249.9±31.58c |
|
5 |
1490.3±41.89 |
1497.3±39.47 |
1756.5±50.22c |
|
6 |
1846.8±46.74 |
1869.8±27.31а |
2221.9±58.21c |
a, b, c - reliably when comparing the control and experimental groups: a - P> 0.95; b - P> 0.99; c - P> 0.999.
In the second half of the experiment, the difference with the control in terms of live weight decreased, and in the group E1, which received feed with 45% replacement of soybeans with sunflower, significantly - up to 1.2 - 1.5% and amounted to only 17.6 - 23 g. The decrease in the difference between the control and the group E2, which was fed food with 70% replacement of soybeans for sunflower, during this period, was insignificant - up to 8.7 - 20.3%. Thus, the difference in live weight between the chickens of the groups E1 and C at the end of rearing practically leveled off. At the same time, chickens of group E2 significantly (P>0.999) exceeded them by this indicator by 375 g. Similar results were obtained by Alagwany M. et al. [13], according to which the replacement of up to 50% of soybean meal with sunflower in the diet of broiler chickens led to an increase in their live weight by 8.1% and an improvement in feed conversion by 13.4% compared to the control. soy broiler chicken protein
It should be noted that the differences established by us in the live weight of the chickens of the experimental and control groups are due to the unequal growth rate of the chickens of these groups at different age periods, as evidenced by the indicators of the average daily and relative gain in live weight (table 4).
Table 4 Intensity of growth of live weight of chickens by rearing periods when using protein sunflower concentrate in the diet
Live weight gain during the rearing period |
Poultry group depending on the level of soybean substitution PSC |
|||
C (0%) |
E1 (45%) |
E2 (70%) |
||
For 14 days |
||||
Absolute, g |
336.5 |
379.4 |
417.8 |
|
Average daily, g |
24.0 |
27.1 |
29.8 |
|
Relative,% |
153.3 |
157.8 |
160.8 |
|
For 28 days |
||||
Absolute, g |
1098.9 |
1117.0 |
1199.0 |
|
Average daily, g |
39.2 |
39.9 |
42.8 |
|
Relative,% |
182.9 |
183.3 |
184.4 |
|
For 42 days |
||||
Absolute, g |
1795.6 |
1819.1 |
2171.0 |
|
Average daily, g |
42.8 |
43.3 |
51.7 |
|
Relative,% |
189.2 |
189.4 |
191.0 |
The average daily gain in live weight during the entire growing period was high in chickens of the group E2, with a 70% level of replacement of soy components with sunflower concentrate in the diet, according to the results of the experiment it was 51.7 g, which is 20.9% higher than in the control, where sunflower was not added to the diet. Chickens of the group E1, which received a diet with 45% replacement of soybeans with sunflower, at the beginning of growing, occupied an intermediate position in this indicator. On the fourth week in this group, a decrease in the intensity of growth of chickens was observed, when an insignificant advantage of the average daily increase in their live weight over the control was recorded (by 0.7 g), and by the end of rearing, the average daily increase in chickens from the group E1 was practically equal to that of the control.
The study of the relative growth rate of poultry live weight showed that the amplitude of intergroup fluctuations was not high - from 4.5 to 7.5% in 14 days of growing, from 0.4 to 1.4% in 28 days and from 0.2 up to 1.8% for the entire period. In general, for the period of feeding the experimental chickens, this indicator ranged from 189.2 to 191.0% with a slight difference between the groups.
Since chickens of all groups ate almost the same amount of feed (feed costs per head did not differ significantly and amounted to 3.41 - 3.49 kg), and the increase in live weight was higher in the group E2, then feed costs per 1 kg of increase in it turned out to be lower at the beginning of the experiment (14 days) by 17%, at the end - by 15.3% (Figure).
The feed conversion for 42 days by chickens fed with the replacement of soy components with sunflower concentrate at the level of 70% was 1.61 kg. In the group E1, whose chickens consumed feed with 45% replacement of soybeans with sunflower, there was a slight decrease in feed costs per 1 kg of live weight gain compared to the control - by 1% (1.89 kg versus 1.90 kg). That is, replacing soybeans with protein sunflower concentrate improved feed conversion in chickens.
Feed costs per 1 kg of increase in live weight of chickens when using different rations, kg: - control (without sunflower); - E1 (45% replacement of soybeans with sunflower); - experiment 2 (70% replacement of soybeans with sunflower)
At the end of the fattening period at 42 days of age, all poultry in groups were slaughtered. The results of the analysis of meat qualities of chickens are determined (Table 5). The yield of gutted carcasses in the control and the group E1 was the same 67.6-67.7%, while in the group E2, which received feed with 70% replacement of soybeans with protein sunflower concentrate this figure was 5.5% higher.
Table 5. Slaughter qualities of broiler chickens when using protein sunflower concentrate in the diet
Indicators |
Poultry group depending on the level of soybean substitution PSC |
|||
C (0%) |
E1 (45%) |
E2 (70%) |
||
Pre-slaughter weight, g |
1841.6±44.54 |
1855.0±36.81 |
2180.0±33.83 |
|
Gutted carcass weight, g |
1246.3±43.63 |
1256.6±38.04 |
1595.0±50.51 |
|
Gutted carcass yield,% |
67.6 |
67.7 |
73.1 |
To compare the effectiveness of feeding poultry with basic and experimental feeds, the EIMP was determined, which in the control is 227, in the group E1 - 216.7, in the group E2 - 322.5 points. In the poultry industry, it is considered acceptable (the limit level) the value of this index is 300 points. With a calculated value of the EIMP equal to or exceeding 300 points, production is considered technologically efficient. As you can see, feeding broiler chickens turned out to be technologically effective when using an experimental feed with replacing soy components with protein sunflower concentrate at the level of 70%, since in this group the EIMP is 322.5, in the other two groups the feeding efficiency was significantly lower.
Thus, our studies confirm the economic efficiency of 70% replacement of soy components with protein sunflower concentrate in broiler diets. That is, taking into account productivity indicators (an increase in live weight and the intensity of its growth, an improvement in feed conversion, an increase in gutted carcass yield), it can be recommended to use compound feed in feeding broiler chickens with an appropriate level of replacement of soybeans with protein sunflower concentrate.
Conclusions
Sunflower by-products, in particular the protein sunflower concentrate we have studied with a crude protein content of 44% and higher, can be quite an acceptable feed ingredient for broiler chickens. Replacing it with soy components (cake and meal) in the diet of broiler chickens can reach 70%, provided that additional lysine is added. Chickens that consumed feed with 70% replacement of soy components with sunflower concentrate showed high safety (98%), an increase in live weight by 20.3% and the intensity of its growth by 20.9%, an improvement in feed conversion by 15.3 %, an increase in the yield of gutted carcasses by 5.5% compared with poultry, the diet of which contained only soy components. The European index of meat productivity of 322.5 points indicates that the use of protein sunflower concentrate instead of soy components at the level of 70% in the broiler chicken ration is technologically effective.
References
1. Senkoylu, N., & Dale, N. (1999). Sunflower meal in poultry diets: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 55(2), 153-174. doi: 10.1079/wps19990011
2. Boiarchuk S.V. (2013). Enerhetychna pozhyvnist bilkovykh kormiv dlia kurchat-broileriv. [Energy nutritional value of protein feed for broiler chickens]. Modern poultry, 5, 20-27. [In Ukrainian].
3. Alagawany, M., Farag, M. R., El-Hack, M. E. A., & Dhama, K. (2015). The Practical Application of Sunflower Meal in Poultry Nutrition. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3(12), 634-648. doi: 10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.12.634.648.
4. Sredanovic, S., Levic, J., & Buragic, O. (2011). Upgrade of sunflower meal processing technology. Helia, 34(54), 139-146. doi: 10.2298/hel1154139s
5. Kuzmenko, L. М. (2013). Efektyvnist kombikormiv z soniashnykovym shrotom pidvyshchenoi kormovoi tsinnosti ta riznoiu strukturoiu zernovoi hrupy u hodivli molodniaku svynei. [The effectiveness of highly nourishing sunflower meal and forage of different composition of crops in feeding growing-fishing pigs]. Pig Breeding. The interdepartmental subject scientific digest, 62, 176181. [In Ukrainian].
6. Zagorakis, K., Liamadis, D., Milis, Ch., Dotas, V., & Dotas, D. (2018). Effects of replacing soybean meal with alternative sources of protein on nutrient digestibility and energy value of sheep diets. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(3), 489. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v48i3.9
7. Ditta, Y. A., & King, A. J. (2017). Recent advances in sunflower seed meal as an alternate source of protein in broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal, 73(3), 527-542. doi: 10.1017/s0043933917000423
8. Baghban-Kanani, P., Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B., Azimi-Youvalari, S., Seidavi, A., Aya§an, T., Laudadio, V., & Tufarelli, V. (2018). Effect of different levels of sunflower meal and multi-enzyme complex on performance, biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of laying hens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(2), 390. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v48i2.20
9. Jankowski, J., Lecewicz, A., Zdunczyk, Z., Juskiewicz, J., & Slominski, B. A. (2011). The effect of partial replacement of soyabean meal with sunflower meal on ileal adaptation, nutrient utilisation and growth performance of young turkeys. British Poultry Science, 52(4), 456-465. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2011.602664
10. Vetesi, M., Mezes, M., & Kiss, L. (1998). Using sunflower meal in waterfowl diets. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 62(1), 7-10.
11. Sangsoponjit, S., Suphalucksana, W., & Srikijkasemwat, K. (2017). Effect of feeding sunflower meal on the performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 58, 841-846. doi: 10.3303/CET1758141.
12. Alagawany, M., Attia, A. I., Ibrahim, Z. A., Mahmoud, R. A., & El-Sayed, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of dietary sunflower meal and exogenous enzyme on growth, digestive enzymes, carcass traits, and blood chemistry of broilers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(13), 12319-12327. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8934-4.
13. The influences of feeding broilers on graded inclusion of sunflower meal with or without Avizyme on growth, protein and energy efficiency, carcass traits, and nutrient digestibility. (2018). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 42(3). doi: 10.3906/vet-1612-85.
14. Waititu, S. M., Sanjayan, N., Hossain, M. M., Leterme, P., & Nyachoti, C. M. (2018). Improvement of the nutritional value of high-protein sunflower meal for broiler chickens using multi-enzyme mixtures. Poultry Science, 97(4), 1245-1252. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex418.
15. Alagawany, M., Attia, A.I., Ibrahim, Z.A., & Mahmoud, R.A. (2017). Impact of Dietary Sunflower Meal on Performance, Blood Parameters and Nutrient Digestibility in Broilers Chickens. International Journal of Animal Science, 1(2), 1007-1011.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
World forest region map. Deforestation as the conversion of forest land to non-forest land for use (arable land, pasture). Effect of destruction of large areas of forest cover on the environment and reduce biodiversity. The methods of forest management.
презентация [1,4 M], добавлен 06.05.2012Productivity Growth in Agriculture: Sources and Constraints. Agriculture in Development Thought. Transition to Sustainability. Economic understanding of process of agricultural development. Technical changes and improvement of efficiency of agriculture.
контрольная работа [31,5 K], добавлен 18.07.2009The concept of economic growth and development. Growth factors: extensive, intensive, the growth of the educational and professional level of personnel, improve the management of production. The factors of production: labor, capital and technology.
презентация [2,3 M], добавлен 21.07.2013Characteristic of growth and development of Brazil and Russian Federation. Dynamics of growth and development. Gross value added by economic activity. Brazilian export of primary and manufactured goods. Export structure. Consumption side of GDP structure.
реферат [778,3 K], добавлен 20.09.2012Economic growth and potential of economic system. The main problems of productive forces in Ukraine. Modern approaches to productivity. Productivity growth in industries. Improvements in infrastructure quality Support of employment of the population.
курсовая работа [15,3 K], добавлен 09.05.2011Asian Development Fund. Poverty reduction in Asia and the Pacific. Promotion of pro poor, sustainable economic growth. Supporting social development. Facilitating good governance. Long-term Strategic Framework. Private, financial sector development.
презентация [298,7 K], добавлен 08.07.2013The analysis dismisses the notion of a genuine trade-off between employment and productivity growth. More and better jobs – an example of goal inconsistency. Background considerations. The dynamic employment-productivity relationship in recent years.
реферат [262,7 K], добавлен 25.06.2010Meat - one of the most important products in the human diet and the most popular meat in our region. Chemical and physical methods of preserving meat and meat products. Canned meat by freezing in brine. Preservation of cold. Canning high temperatures.
реферат [23,8 K], добавлен 30.11.2015Research of negative influence of computer games with the elements of violence and aggression on psychical development of children and teenagers. Reasons of choice of computer games young people in place of walk and intercourse in the real society.
доклад [15,3 K], добавлен 10.06.2014Influence psychology of cognitive activity and cognitive development on student’s learning abilities during study. Cognitive development theory in psychology. Analysis of Jean Piaget's theory. Her place among the other concept of personal development.
презентация [1,3 M], добавлен 13.04.2016The development of modern medicine. The creation of internal organs, implants. The use of modern orthopaedics mechanical devices. The replacement of lost parts of the human body by means of surgical operations. Bridge denture. The use of prostheses.
презентация [5,0 M], добавлен 31.05.2016Tradition of the ballad in the history of Europe. Influence of the Spanish romance on development of a genre of the ballad. The ballad in Renaissance. Development of a genre of the literary ballad. The ballad in the history of the Russian poetry.
реферат [38,1 K], добавлен 12.01.2015History of the origin and development of Marxism, especially its development under the influence of the K. Marx, Fr. Engels, R. Luxemburg, V. Lenin, L. Trotsky, and many other lesser-known thinkers. Analysis of the relationship of Marxism and feminism.
магистерская работа [179,1 K], добавлен 22.06.2010Evaluation of urban public transport system in Indonesia, the possibility of its effective development. Analysis of influence factors by using the Ishikawa Cause and Effect diagram and also the use of Pareto analysis. Using business process reengineering.
контрольная работа [398,2 K], добавлен 21.04.2014The general outline of word formation in English: information about word formation as a means of the language development - appearance of a great number of new words, the growth of the vocabulary. The blending as a type of modern English word formation.
курсовая работа [54,6 K], добавлен 18.04.2014The influence of the movement of refugees to the economic development of host countries. A description of the differences between forced and voluntary migration from the point of view of economic, political consequences. Supply in the labor markets.
статья [26,6 K], добавлен 19.09.2017Disintegration of the USSR. Restoration of Russia. Influence of the open market. The Asian financial crisis. Increase of local manufacture. Fast lifting of economy, gross national product. Export of consumer goods. Fluctuations in the world prices.
топик [12,4 K], добавлен 04.02.2009Місце Англії за рейтингом "Global competitivness index", "Human Development Index", "Corruption Perceptions Index". Порівняльний аналіз обсягу та динаміки ВВП країни із середнім по Європейського Союзу. Аналіз ВВП на душу населення країни та у відсотках.
курсовая работа [4,4 M], добавлен 05.03.2013Concept of development basic law. Protection of freedom through the implementation of the principle of subsidiarity. Analysis of the humanitarian aspects of the legal status of a person. Systematic review of articles of the constitution of Russia.
реферат [21,2 K], добавлен 14.02.2015Example of a bond valuing. Bond prices and yields. Stocks and stock market. Valuing common stocks. Capitalization rate. Constant growth DDM. Payout and plowback ratio. Assuming the dividend. Present value of growth opportunities. Sustainable growth rate.
презентация [748,8 K], добавлен 02.08.2013