The efficiency of microbial preparations in different systems of fertilizing crops
Investigation of the efficiency of microbial preparations in the cultivation of crops in crop rotation with different fertilizer systems. The use of microbial preparations for pre-sowing inoculation of seeds of crops. The organic fertilizer system.
Рубрика | Сельское, лесное хозяйство и землепользование |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 13.09.2022 |
Размер файла | 56,0 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Institute of Agricultural Microbiology and Agro- Industrial Manufacture of NAAS
The efficiency of microbial preparations in different systems of fertilizing crops
Volkohon V., Dimova S.,
Volkohon K., Sydorenko V.
Chernihiv
Annotation
Goal. To investigate the efficiency of microbial preparations in the cultivation of crops in crop rotation with different fertilizer systems. Methods. A field experiment, statistical. Results. The use of microbial preparations for pre-sowing inoculation of seeds of crops contributed to the growth of productivity of agricultural lands, however, the effectiveness of such measures depended on fertilizer systems. Bacterization increased the yield of potato, barley and pea at the cultivation of the crops on the background of low and medium mineral soil fertility, and especially for the combination of fertilizer with the effect and after-effect of use of 5 t/ha of wheat straw, and lupin as intermediate green manure. Preplant bacterization of winter wheat was effective in all studied doses of fertilizers and intensified on the background of the after-effect of straw and green manure. With the organic fertilizer system, the efficiency of microbial preparations depended on the kind of organic fertilizer. The low stimulating effect of the preparations was provided on the background of 5 t/ha of straw. In the year of the direct action of 40 t/ha of bedding manure of cattle, the efficiency of bacterization was leveled. In subsequent years (for the aftereffect of fertilizers) the growth of yields was reliable, but the smallest among the studied agricultural backgrounds. A high stimulating effect was observed when growing bacterized plants on green manure agricultural background and for the combination of straw with green manure biomass. Conclusions. The use of microbial preparations for pre-sowing bacterization of seeds is an effective agricultural measure in the techniques of cultivation of crops, but their influence on the productivity of agrocenoses depends on the fertilizer system.
Key words: biological products, mineral fertilizers, straw, green manure crops, manure, crop rotation,potato, barley, pea, wheat.
The main text
microbial preparation cultivation crop
In the soil-microorganisms-plant system the soil bacteria and microscopic fungi play essential and an integral role. The plant backed up with a full complex of microorganisms, actively develops roots, receives from the soil nutrients in easily digestible form and physiologically active compounds, that positively influence its production process. However, due to unjustified use of mineral fertilizers, pesticides, failures of follow crop rotation, etc. most soils in modern agrocenosis have distorted composition of microorganisms, requiring urgent correction [1 - 8]. The optimum solution of this problem is the use of microbial preparations, created on the basis of selected active strains of microorganisms.
Analysis of recent researches and publications
Various scientific centers have developed biological preparations for most crop types, including non-legumes [9 - 18]. Numerous field and production experiments, lysimeter installations, 15N research studies etc. have proved that effect of biologicals on the production process of crops may be equivalent to 30 - 60 kg/ha of mineral nitrogen and 15 - 30 kg/ha of phosphorus [12]. This is due to the increasing absorption level of the active substances from fertilizers and the improvement of constructive metabolism of crops, when plant mineral compounds actively being used in the synthesis of organic substances [19 - 21]. However, quite often the production does not note the positive effects of inoculation. This can be explained by different factors, case wise, but with systems of crops fertilizing playing an important part.
The goal of research is to study the efficacy of microbial preparations on crops cultivation in rotation under the use of different fertilizing systems.
Materials and methods
The research was conducted during 2016 - 2018 in a stationary (started in 2009) experimental field of the Institute of Agricultural Microbiology and Agroindustrial Manufacture, NAAS, on leached chernozem, under short crop rotations scheme (potato - spring barley - pea - winter wheat).
The agrochemical characteristics of soil were as follows: pHsalt - 5.3; humus content - 3.03 %; easily hydrolysable nitrogen - 95 mg/kg of soil; mobile phosphorus compounds (Р2О5 ) - 150 mg/kg of soil (by Kirsanov); exchangeable potassium (К2О) content (by Kirsanov) - 108 mg/kg of soil.
The crops were grown in the two blocks - with and without the inoculation with the selected microbial preparations. Crops inoculation was performed with the following biologicals: Biohran, for potato (TU U 24.1-00497360-006:2009) Microhumin, for spring barley (TU U 24.1-00497360-007:2009), Rhizohumin, for pea (TU U 24.1-00497360-003:2007) and Polymyxobacterin, for winter wheat (TU U 24.1-00497360004:2009). All biological preparations are registered in the Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine and permitted for use in agriculture.
Potatoes of Skarbnytsia variety were grown by the following scheme: 1 - without fertilizers; 2 - straw; 3 green manure; 4 - manure; 5 - straw + green manure; 6 - manure + green manure; 7 - N40P40K40; 8 - N40P40K40 + straw + green manure; 9 - N80P80K80; 10 - N80P80K80 + straw + green manure; 11 - N120P120K120; 12 - N120P120K120 + straw + green manure; 13 - manure + N40P40K40; 14 - manure + green manure + N40P40K40.
Spring barley of Hosia variety was grown by the following scheme: 1 - without fertilizers; 2 - straw*; 3 green manure*; 4 - manure*; 5 - straw* + green manure*; 6 - manure* + green manure*; 7 - N30P30K30; 8 - straw* + green manure* + N30P30K30; 9 - N60P60K60; 10 - straw* + green manure* + N60P60K60; 11 - N90P90K90; 12 - straw* + green manure* + N90P90K90;13 - manure* + N60P60K60; 14 - manure* + green manure* +N60P60K60 (note: * - first year after-effect of organic matter).
Pea plants of Hotivskyi variety were cultivated following by the following scheme: 1 - without fertilizers; 2 - straw**; 3 - green manure**; 4 - manure**; 5 - straw** + green manure**; 6 - manure** + green manure**; 7 - N30P30K30; 8 - straw** + green manure** + N30P30K30; 9 - N60P60K60; 10 - straw** + green manure** + N60P60K60; 11 - N90P90K90; 12 - straw** + green manure** + N90P90K90; 13 - manure** + N30P30K30; 14 - manure** + green manure** + N30P30K30 (note: ** - second year after-effect of organic matter).
Winter wheat of Poliska 90 variety was grown by the following scheme: 1 - without fertilizers; 2 - straw***; 3 - green manure***; 4 - manure***; 5 - straw*** + green manure***; 6 - manure*** + green manure***; 7 - N30P30K30; 8 - straw*** + green manure*** + N30P30K30; 9 - N60P60K60; 10 - straw*** + green manure *** + N60P60K60; 11 - N90P90K90; 12 - Straw * * * + green manure*** + N90P90K90; 13 - manure*** + N30P30K30; 14 - manure*** + green manure*** + N30P30K30 (note: *** - third year after-effect of organic matter).
Raw fresh organic matter was introduced prior to the planting of potatoes. The chopped straw in the amount of 5 t/ha was incorporated into the soil immediately after harvesting of winter wheat (in the crop rotation -- the predecessor of potatoes) using disks, followed by the intermediate green manure crop Lupinus angustifolia (where applicable). The raw green mass of lupine (13 - 15 t/ha depending on the years of the study) was incorporated into the soil through disking and shallow (15 cm) ploughing in late fall (end of November). At the same time, the bedding cattle manure was incorporated into the soil on the appropriate variants at the rate of 40 t/ha.
The area of the research site is 43.2 m2 (7.2 x 6.0), 4-fold repetition. Experiments planning and conducting were carried out following B. Dospekhov [22]. The statistical processing of the experimental data was performed using the dispersing analysis method in Microsoft Office Excel 2003 - 2007 software.
Research results
The yield of potatoes has increased under the crop cultivation in all studied fertilizing systems (table. 1). However, it was noticed that the efficiency of microbial preparation Biohran was subject to fertilizing background.
Cultivation of inoculated potatoes with mineral fertilizers have resulted in some of the largest yield gains throughout the experiment. At the same time, it should be emphasized, that the effectiveness of the Biohran preparation has reduced with the increasing norm of mineral fertilizers. In part, this negativity trend was neutralized through the application of complex mineral fertilizers on the background of the combined use of straw and lupine green manure, which is likely due to the prolonged action of mineral nitrogen by its temporary immobilization with a fresh organic substance with a wide C/N ratio.
Potatoes cultivation on the wheat straw background has not resulted in reliable yield increase. In contrast, a significant increase in the productivity of agrocenosis from the use of Biohran was observed in the variant with green manure. Especially high efficiency of biological was observed on the “straw + green manure” background, leading to the largest yield increase noticed in the experiment - 3.5 t/ha.
Over the study years, no yields increase from bacterization was observed in the tests with potatoes grown on the background of 40 t/ha cattle manure. Low, if any, effectiveness of biopreparation can be explained by high pool of microorganisms introduced into the soil with the manure. Thus, the attempts to introduction the selected bacteria into the agrocenosis under these circumstances can have a strong competition, which will prevent the formation of the plant-bacteria associations. Through the manure application the soil was inoculated for the centuries making the additional inoculation means ineffective.
Even in the late XIX century. V. Dokuchaev wrote that a large number of microorganisms are introduced into the soil with the manure, playing an equally important role with fertilizers [23].
The combination of manure with a low norm of fertilizers in the experiment also has not ensured the performance of biopreparation. Only its combination with the green manure contributed to the reliable increase in potatoes yield (see Table 1).
1. Effect of fertilizing and inoculation on potato crop yield
Variants |
Yield, t/ha (average for three years) |
Increase from fertilizer and inoculation, t/ha |
Increase from inoculation, t/ha |
|
Without inoculation |
||||
Without fertilizers, control |
13,0 |
- |
- |
|
Straw |
13,4 |
0,4 |
-- |
|
Green manure |
14,6 |
1,6 |
-- |
|
Manure |
22,8 |
9,8 |
-- |
|
Straw + green manure |
16,2 |
3,2 |
- |
|
Manure + green manure |
24,0 |
11,0 |
-- |
|
N40P40K40 |
15,7 |
2,7 |
- |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure |
21,1 |
8,1 |
- |
|
N80P80K80 |
24,6 |
11,6 |
- |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure |
29,1 |
16,1 |
- |
|
N120P120K120 |
29,2 |
16,2 |
- |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure |
34,2 |
21,2 |
- |
|
Manure + N40P40K40 |
29,4 |
16,4 |
- |
|
Manure + N40P40K40+ green manure |
31,6 |
18,6 |
- |
|
With Biohran |
||||
Without fertilizers |
14,7 |
- |
1,7 |
|
Straw |
14,3 |
1,3 |
0,9 |
|
Green manure |
16,5 |
3,5 |
1,9 |
|
Manure |
23,1 |
10,1 |
0,3 |
|
Straw + green manure |
19,7 |
6,7 |
3,5 |
|
Manure + green manure |
25,9 |
12,9 |
1,9 |
|
N40P40K40 |
18,1 |
5,1 |
2,4 |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure |
23,8 |
10,8 |
2,7 |
|
N80P80K80 |
26,1 |
13,1 |
1,5 |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure |
30,8 |
17,8 |
1,7 |
|
N120P120K120 |
30,5 |
17,5 |
1,3 |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure |
35,8 |
22,8 |
1,6 |
|
Manure + N40P40K40 |
30,1 |
17,1 |
0,7 |
|
Manure + N40P40K40+ green manure |
33,0 |
20,0 |
1,4 |
|
LSD05 |
1,1 |
The effectiveness of microbial preparation Microhumin was observed in all studied variants (Table 2) with spring barley cultivation after the first year of aftereffect of organic and direct action of mineral fertilizers. However, the observed yield increase was one of the smallest in the experiment for the cattle manure after effect.
2. Influence of fertilizing and inoculation on yield of spring barley
Variants |
Yield, t/ha (average for three years) |
Increase from fertilizer and inoculation, t/ha i |
Increase from noculation, t/ha |
|
Without inoculation |
||||
Without fertilizers, control |
2,07 |
- |
- |
|
Straw* |
2,21 |
0,14 |
- |
|
Green manure* |
2,41 |
0,34 |
- |
|
Manure* |
3,40 |
1,33 |
- |
|
Straw* + green manure* |
2,67 |
0,60 |
- |
|
Manure* + green manure* |
3,64 |
1,57 |
- |
|
N40P40K40 |
2,56 |
0,49 |
- |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure* |
3,26 |
1,19 |
- |
|
N80P80K80 |
2,94 |
0,87 |
- |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure* |
3,56 |
1,49 |
- |
|
N120P120K120 |
3,57 |
1,50 |
- |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure* |
3,89 |
1,82 |
- |
|
Manure + N40P40K40 |
4,02 |
1,95 |
- |
|
Manure + N40P40K40+ green manure* |
4,17 |
2,10 |
- |
|
With Microhumin |
||||
Without fertilizers |
2,53 |
0,46 |
0,46 |
|
Straw* |
2,69 |
0,62 |
0,48 |
|
Green manure* |
2,90 |
0,83 |
0,49 |
|
Manure* |
3,64 |
1,57 |
0,24 |
|
Straw + green manure* |
3,25 |
1,18 |
0,58 |
|
Manure + green manure* |
4,02 |
1,95 |
0,38 |
|
N40P40K40 |
3,06 |
0,99 |
0,50 |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure* |
3,75 |
1,68 |
0,49 |
|
N80P80K80 |
3,40 |
1,33 |
0,46 |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure* |
3,99 |
1,92 |
0,43 |
|
N120P120K120 |
3,80 |
1,73 |
0,23 |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure* |
4,10 |
2,03 |
0,21 |
|
Manure* + N40P40K40 |
4,26 |
2,19 |
0,24 |
|
Manure* + N40P40K40+ green manure* |
4,46 |
2,39 |
0,29 |
|
LSD05 |
0,21 |
*) first year aftereffect of organic fertilizers
High efficiency of pre-sowing inoculation of barley seeds was noted in the test plots with the aftereffect of all other types of organic fertilizers, and especially lupine green manure. Low and medium norms of mineral fertilizers also provided significant increments of crop yield - 0.46 - 0.50 t/ha. Whilst high norm of mineral fertilizers has significantly decreased the efficiency of Microhumin.
Peas cultivation on the second-year after-effects of organic fertilizers with the microbial preparation Rhizohumin has significantly increase the crop yield by 0.30 - 0.35 t/ha (Table 3). Also, the preparation action was not masked with the action of the cattle manure after-effect.
3. The effect of fertilizing and inoculation on the yield of peas
Variants |
Yield, t/ha (average for three years) |
Increase from fertilizer and inoculation, t/ha |
Increase from inoculation, t/ha |
|
Without inoculation |
||||
Without fertilizers, control |
2,16 |
- |
- |
|
Straw** |
2,33 |
0,17 |
-- |
|
Green manure** |
2,38 |
0,22 |
- |
|
Manure** |
2,44 |
0,28 |
- |
|
Straw** + green manure** |
2,38 |
0,22 |
- |
|
Manure** + green manure** |
2,58 |
0,42 |
- |
|
N40P40K40 |
2,70 |
0,54 |
- |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure** |
2,87 |
0,71 |
- |
|
N80P80K80 |
2,95 |
0,79 |
- |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure** |
3,15 |
0,99 |
- |
|
N120P120K120 |
3,19 |
1,03 |
- |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure** |
3,32 |
1,16 |
- |
|
Manure** + N40P40K40 |
2,99 |
0,83 |
- |
|
Manure** + N40P40K40+ green manure** |
3,10 |
0,94 |
- |
|
With Ryzohumin |
||||
Without fertilizers |
2,48 |
0,32 |
0,32 |
|
Straw** |
2,63 |
0,47 |
0,30 |
|
Green manure** |
2,73 |
0,57 |
0,35 |
|
Manure** |
2,78 |
0,62 |
0,34 |
|
Straw** + green manure** |
2,77 |
0,61 |
0,39 |
|
Manure** + green manure** |
2,94 |
0,78 |
0,36 |
|
N40P40K40 |
3,19 |
1,03 |
0,49 |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure** |
3,38 |
1,22 |
0,51 |
|
N80P80K80 |
3,28 |
1,12 |
0,33 |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure** |
3,50 |
1,34 |
0,35 |
|
N120P120K120 |
3,35 |
1,19 |
0,16 |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure** |
3,61 |
1,45 |
0,29 |
|
Manure** + N40P40K40 |
3,28 |
1,12 |
0,29 |
|
Manure** + N40P40K40+ green manure** |
3,41 |
1,25 |
0,31 |
|
LSD05 |
0,16 |
**) second year aftereffect of organic fertilizers
The largest yield increase from inoculation on peas was observed in the variants with the crop cultivation on a low mineral fertilizing background. With the increase of norms of mineral fertilizers in the technology of pea cultivation, the efficiency of Rhizohumin was decreasing.
The application of the microbial preparation Polymyxobacterin in the technologies of winter wheat cultivation has positively affected the crop yields (Table 4). The biological preparation has provided yield increments on all investigated fertilizing backgrounds. However, it should be noted the highest values were observed in the tests with the use of mineral fertilizers. Thus, whilst the yield gains from bacterization at wheat cultivation with the organic fertilizing systems were within 0.30 - 0.49 t/ha, the use of mineral fertilizers has ensured yield increase of 0.80 - 0.95 t/ha.
The smallest, though still reliable, yield gain from inoculation was observed for the wheat cultivation on the background of the aftereffect of manure. As with the cultivation of other crops (see the discussion above), the direct action and aftereffect of the intermediate lupine green manure appeared to have the have the best action on the performance of microbial preparations among the studied organic agricultural backgrounds.
To assess the impact of microbial preparations on the performance of agrocenosis in the crop rotation, the crop yield values were recalculated in grain units, used to compare the effectiveness of agricultural means upon the cultivation of different crop types [24]. The results obtained have confirmed the above made conclusions about the effectiveness of biotechnologies subject to the individual crop fertilizing system.
4. Influence of fertilizing and inoculation on the yield of wheat
Experiment variants |
Yield, t/ha (average for three years) |
Increase from fertilizer and inoculation, t/ha |
Increase from inoculation, t/ha |
|
Without inoculation |
||||
Without fertilizers, control |
3,92 |
- |
- |
|
Straw*** |
3,95 |
0,03 |
-- |
|
Green manure*** |
4,04 |
0,12 |
-- |
|
Manure*** |
4,12 |
0,20 |
-- |
|
Straw*** + green manure*** |
4,03 |
0,11 |
-- |
|
Manure*** + green manure*** |
4,20 |
0,28 |
-- |
|
N40P40K40 |
4,25 |
0,33 |
-- |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure*** |
4,35 |
0,43 |
-- |
|
N80P80K80 |
4,42 |
0,50 |
-- |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure*** |
4,50 |
0,58 |
-- |
|
N120P120K120 |
4,64 |
0,72 |
-- |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure*** |
4,75 |
0,83 |
-- |
|
Manure*** + N40P40K40 |
4,60 |
0,68 |
-- |
|
Manure*** + N40P40K40+ green manure*** |
4,61 |
0,69 |
-- |
|
With Polymyxobacterin |
||||
Without fertilizers |
4,24 |
0,32 |
0,32 |
|
Straw*** |
4,35 |
0,43 |
0,40 |
|
Green manure*** |
4,53 |
0,61 |
0,49 |
|
Manure*** |
4,42 |
0,50 |
0,30 |
|
Straw*** + green manure*** |
4,43 |
0,51 |
0,40 |
|
Manure*** + green manure*** |
4,62 |
0,70 |
0,42 |
|
N40P40K40 |
5,10 |
1,18 |
0,85 |
|
N40P40K40+ green manure*** |
5,22 |
1,30 |
0,87 |
|
N80P80K80 |
5,30 |
1,38 |
0,88 |
|
N80P80K80+ green manure*** |
5,40 |
1,48 |
0,90 |
|
N120P120K120 |
5,51 |
1,59 |
0,87 |
|
N120P120K120+ green manure*** |
5,70 |
1,78 |
0,95 |
|
Manure*** + N40P40K40 |
5,40 |
1,48 |
0,80 |
|
Manure*** + N40P40K40+ green manure*** |
5,53 |
1,61 |
0,92 |
|
LSD05 |
0,21 |
***) third year aftereffect of organic fertilizers
The largest yield increments were obtained for the systemic use of biological preparations in crops growing on the low and medium mineral agricultural backgrounds (Table 5). Under the use of intensive mineral fertilization system, the effectiveness of microbial preparations has reduced. In part, it was restored in the variants with the combined use of straw and green manure on a mineral fertilizers background.
Under the use of solely organic fertilizing systems, the smallest increments from inoculation were observed for crops cultivated on the background of cattle manure, whilst the largest - under the use of intermediate lupin green manure.
5 Average performance crop rotation for various systems of fertilizing and exposure of microbial drugs
Fertilizing Systems |
Grain units, t/ha/year |
Increase from inoculation, t/ha |
|
Without inoculation |
|||
Without fertilizers, control |
13,13 |
-- |
|
Straw |
13,70 |
-- |
|
Green manure |
14,38 |
-- |
|
Manure |
17,61 |
-- |
|
Straw + green manure |
15,03 |
-- |
|
Manure + green manure |
18,48 |
-- |
|
Mineral low |
15,60 |
-- |
|
Mineral low + straw + green manure |
18,06 |
-- |
|
Mineral average |
18,82 |
-- |
|
Mineral average + straw + green manure |
21,01 |
-- |
|
Mineral intense |
21,25 |
-- |
|
Mineral intense + straw + green manure |
23,17 |
-- |
|
Organic + inorganic №1 (manure + NPK) |
21,35 |
-- |
|
Organic + inorganic №2 (manure + green manure + NPK) |
22,26 |
-- |
|
With microbial preparations |
|||
Without fertilizers |
14,91 |
1,78 |
|
Straw |
15,35 |
1,65 |
|
Green manure |
16,47 |
2,09 |
|
Manure |
18,84 |
1,23 |
|
Straw + green manure |
17,60 |
2,57 |
|
Manure + green manure |
20,41 |
1,93 |
|
Mineral low |
18,43 |
2,83 |
|
Mineral low + straw + green manure |
21,00 |
2,94 |
|
Mineral average |
21,13 |
2,31 |
|
Mineral average + straw + green manure |
23,39 |
2,38 |
|
Mineral intense |
22,97 |
1,72 |
|
Mineral intense + straw + green manure |
25,25 |
2,08 |
|
Organic + inorganic №1 (manure + NPK) |
23,09 |
1,74 |
|
Organic + inorganic №2 (manure + green manure + NPK) |
24,38 |
2,12 |
It should be noted that intermediate green manure is a significant supplement for other organic fertilizing systems and promotes the effectiveness of biopreparations. Even in the combination with cattle manure, the green fertilizer significantly improves the situation and ensures yield increase under the use of biopreparations.
Experiment results lead to the preliminary conclusion on the formation of the best conditions for the performance of microbial preparations for systemic cultivation of crops on mineral fertilizers background. This corresponds to the logic of the microorganisms' behavior while capturing free niches in the absence of a competitive environment. That is, under such conditions soil diminishes of the agronomic useful microorganisms, which promotes the development of an introduced bacteria and the formation of productive plant- microbial associations.
The introduction of cattle manure reduces the efficiency of the microbial preparations due to the formation of highly competitive environment in the soil, which prevents the establishment of close relationships between the plant and the introduced bacteria.
The positive effect of the interim lupine green manure is probably caused by the fact that the biomass of lupin green manure is faintly contaminated by microorganisms and is quickly mineralized. In addition, it is possible that the products of its mineralization are used as an additional nutritional source by the introduced bacteria. However, this assumption requires additional research.
Conclusions
The effectiveness of microbial preparations upon their application for pre-sowing inoculation of seed material is high when crops are cultivated on the direct and/or post-effect background of lupine green manure and upon the combination of green fertilizer with straw. Under the introduction of cattle manure, the influence of pre-sowing seeds inoculation is largely leveled, but can be restored by the combination of cattle manure with lupine green manure.
The significant influence of inoculation on the yield of potatoes, spring barley and peas was observed on the background of low and medium norms of mineral fertilizers. Inoculation of winter wheat seeds have contributed to a significant growth in crop yields in all studied variants, particularly in the tests with the intensive mineral fertilizing (N90P90K90) system. The effectiveness of biologic preparations is increased in the organic-mineral systems of crops was fertilizing (mineral fertilizers + straw + lupine green manure).
References
1. Bashan, Y., & Levanony, H. (1990). Current status of Azospirillum inoculation technology: Azospirillum as a challenge for agriculture. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 36(9), 591-601.
2. Patyka, V. P., Kots, S. Ya., Volkohon, V. V. Sherstoboieva, O. V., Melnychuk, T. M., Kalinichenko, A. V., & Hrynyk, I. V. (Patyka, V. P. (Ed.)). (2003). Biolohichnyi azot [Biological nitrogen]. Kyiv: Svit. [In Ukrainian].
3. Tikhonovich, I. A., & Kruglov, Yu. V. (2006). Mikrobiologicheskie aspekty plodorodiya pochvy i problemy ustoychivogo zemledeliya [Microbiological aspects of soil fertility and problems of sustainable agriculture]. Fertility, 5(32), 9-12. [In Russian].
4. Kurdysh, I. K. (2010). Introduktsiia mikroorhanizmiv u ahroekosystemy [Introduction of microorganism in agroecosystems]. Kyiv: Scientific thought. [In Ukrainian].
5. Iutinskaya, G. A., & Ponomarenko, S. P. (2010). Bioregulyatsiya mikrobno-rastitelnykh sistem [Bioregulation of microbial-plant systems]. Kyiv: Nichlava. [In Russian].
6. Shaposhnikov, A. I., Belimov, A. A., Kravchenko, L. V., & Vivanko, D. M. (2011). Vzaimodeystvie rizosfernykh bakteriy s rasteniyami: mekhanizmy obrazovaniya i faktory effektivnosti assotsiativnykh simbiozov [Interaction of rhizospheric bacteria with plants: formation mechanisms and efficiency factors of associative symbioses]. Agricultural Biology, 3, 16-22. [In Russian].
7. De-la-Pena, C., & Loyola-Vargas, V. M. (2014). Biotic Interactions in the Rhizosphere: A Diverse Cooperative Enterprise for Plant Productivity. Plant Physiology, 166, 701-719. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp. 114.241810.
8. Gadzalo, Ya. M., Patyka, N. V., & Zarishnyak, A. S. (2015). Agrobiologiya rizosfery rasteniy [Agrobiology of the plant rhizosphere]. Kyiv: Agricultural science. [In Russian].
9. Postnikov, N., Morozov, D., & Shitikova, A. (2002). Mikrobiologicheskie preparaty - dopolnenie k udobreniyam [Microbiological preparations - addition to fertilizers]. Potatoes and vegetables, 3, 28. [In Russian].
10. Bashan, Y., Holguin, G., & de-Bashan, L. E. (2004). Azospirillum - plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural and environmental advances (1997-2003). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 50, 521-577. https://doi.org/10.1139/w04-035.
11. Tikhonovich, I. A., Kozhemyakov, A. P., Chebotar, V. K., Kruglov, Yu. V., Kandybin, N. V., & Laptev G. Yu. (Tikhonovich, I. A., & Kruglov, Yu. V., (Eds.)) (2005). Biopreparaty v sel'skom khozyaystve. Metodologiya i praktika primeneniya mikroorganizmov v rastenievodstve i kormoproizvodstve [Biological products in agriculture. Methodology and practice of using microorganisms in crop production and fodder production]. Moscow. [In Russian].
12. Volkogon, V. V., Nadkernychna, O. V., Kovalevska, T. M., Tokmakova, L. M., Kopylov, Ye. P., Kozar, S. F.,... Khalep, Yu. M. (Volkogon, V. V. (Ed.)) (2006). Mikrobnipreparaty u zemlerobstvi. Teoriia i praktyka [Microbial preparations in agriculture. Theory and practice]. Kyiv: Agricultural science. [In Ukrainian].
13. Zavalin, A. A. (2005) Biopreparaty, udobreniya i urozhay [Biological products, fertilizers and crops]. Moscow. [In Russian].
14. Volkogon, V. V., Zaryshniak, A. S., Hrynyk, I. V., Berdnikov, O. M., Tsentylo, L. V., Nadkernychna, O. V., Moskalenko, A. M.,... Murach, O. M. (Volkogon, V. V. (Ed.)) (2011). Metodolohiia i praktyka vykorystannia mikrobnykh preparativ u tekhnolohiiakh vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur [Methodology and practice of using microbial preparations in technologies of growing crops]. Kyiv: Agricultural science. [In Ukrainian].
15. O'Callaghan, M. (2016). Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: issues and opportunities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100, 5729-5746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253- 016-7590-9.
16. Agami, R. A., Ghramh, H. A., & Hashem, M. (2017). Seed inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum alleviates the adverse effects of drought stress on wheat plants. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 90, 165-173. https:// doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2017.090.021.
17. Zuluaga, M. Y. A., Milani, K. M. L., Goncales, L. S. A., & de Oliveira, A. L. M. (2020). Diversity and plant growth-promoting functions of diazotrophic/N-scavenging bacteria isolated from the soils and rhizospheres of two species of Solanum. PLOS ONE, 15(1). https:// doi.org/10.1371/iournal.pone.0227422.
18. Etesami, H., Emami, S., & Alikhani, H. A. (2017). Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): Mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017000400005.
19. Lin, W., Okon, Y., & Hardy, R. W. F. (1983). Enhanced mineral uptake by Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor roots inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 45(6), 17751779.
20. Volkogon, V. V., Husiev, O. V., Davydova, O. Ye., & Maltseva, N. M. (2004). Vyvchennia osoblyvostei azotnoho zhyvlennia yachmeniu metodom izotopnoho rozbavlennia pry zastosuvanni trymanu 1, mineralnykh dobryv ta inokuliatsii [Study of the peculiarities of nitrogen nutrition of barley by isotopic dilution with the use of tryman 1, mineral fertilizers and inoculation]. Physiology and biochemistry of cultivated plants, 36(5), 444-450. [In Ukrainian].
21. Volkogon, V. V., Dimova, S. B., Volkogon, K. I., Borulko, R. O., & Berdnikov, O. M. (2010). Vplyv mikrobnykh preparativ na zasvoiennia kulturnymy roslynamy pozhyvnykh rechovyn [Influence of microbial preparations on assimilation of nutrients by cultivated plants]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 5, 25-28. [In Ukrainian].
22. Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta s osnovamistatisticheskoyobrabotkirezul'tatov issledovaniy [Field experiment methodology with the basics of statistical processing of research results]. Moscow: Agropromizdat. [In Russian].
23. Dokuchaev, V. V. (1948). K voprosu ob otkrytii pri russkikh universitetakh kafedr pochvovedeniya i uchenie o mikroorganizmakh [On the issue of opening soil science departments at Russian universities and the doctrine of microorganisms]. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected works]. (Vol. 2, pp. 290-318). Moscow. [In Russian].
24. Tomme, M. F. (1964). Korma SSSR. Sostav i pitatelnost [Feed USSR. Composition and Nutrition]. Moscow: Kolos. [In Russian].
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
The nature and terms of the specialization of agricultural enterprises. The dynamics of the production of corn for grain. Deepening of specialization and improve production efficiency. The introduction of mechanization and advanced technologies.
курсовая работа [67,7 K], добавлен 13.05.2015Types of the software for project management. The reasonability for usage of outsourcing in the implementation of information systems. The efficiency of outsourcing during the process of creating basic project plan of information system implementation.
реферат [566,4 K], добавлен 14.02.2016History of the online payment systems. Payment service providers. Online bill payments and bank transefrs. Pros and cons for using online payment systems. Card Holder Based On Biometrics. Theft in online payment system. Online banking services, risk.
реферат [37,2 K], добавлен 26.05.2014Theoretical aspects of efficiency of development of advertising activity and your place in marketing system, development and its value for manufacturers and consumers. Research of the advertising campaign of the new goods in open company "Nataly".
дипломная работа [49,3 K], добавлен 19.06.2010The essence of economic efficiency and its features determination in grain farming. Methodology basis of analysis and efficiency of grain. Production resources management and use. Dynamics of grain production. The financial condition of the enterprise.
курсовая работа [70,0 K], добавлен 02.07.2011The term "political system". The theory of social system. Classification of social system. Organizational and institutional subsystem. Sociology of political systems. The creators of the theory of political systems. Cultural and ideological subsystem.
реферат [18,8 K], добавлен 29.04.2016The oxygen consumption as the most important difference between pediatric and adult patients. Basic anesthetic technique, postoperative care, intra-operative problem. Anesthesia breathing systems and the efficiency of the present breathing circuits.
презентация [1,0 M], добавлен 15.04.2010Consideration of a systematic approach to the identification of the organization's processes for improving management efficiency. Approaches to the identification of business processes. Architecture of an Integrated Information Systems methodology.
реферат [195,5 K], добавлен 12.02.2016Introduction to Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) for mobile robot. Navigational sensors used in SLAM: Internal, External, Range sensors, Odometry, Inertial Navigation Systems, Global Positioning System. Map processing and updating principle.
курсовая работа [3,4 M], добавлен 17.05.2014The computer systems and unique possibilities for fulfillment before unknown offenses. The main risks and threats to information systems security in the internet. Internet as a port of escape of the confidential information and its damage minimization.
контрольная работа [19,6 K], добавлен 17.02.2011The internal and external communication systems of the Nestle company. Background of the company. SWOT analysis: strength, weaknesses, opportunities. Architecture of Intranet systems. Business use of intranet systems. Intranet tools and its benefits.
контрольная работа [304,7 K], добавлен 28.10.2013Productivity Growth in Agriculture: Sources and Constraints. Agriculture in Development Thought. Transition to Sustainability. Economic understanding of process of agricultural development. Technical changes and improvement of efficiency of agriculture.
контрольная работа [31,5 K], добавлен 18.07.2009Negative consequences proceeding in real sector of economy. Social stratification in a society. Estimation of efficiency of economic safety. The parity of the manufacturers of commodity production. Main problems of the size of pension of common people.
статья [15,4 K], добавлен 12.04.2012Overview history of company and structure of organization. Characterization of complex tasks and necessity of automation. Database specifications and system security. The calculation of economic efficiency of the project. Safety measures during work.
дипломная работа [1009,6 K], добавлен 09.03.2015The basis of the study of economic systems of the countries of the world. Description of the administrative command system. Estimation of the market system and its implementation by the countries. Post-industrial society as a modern economic system.
реферат [30,3 K], добавлен 24.03.2014Анализ финансового состояния предприятия "EPAM Systems". Принципы управления качеством, принятые в компании. Центр управления проектами-PMC. Управление продукцией, не соответствующей качеству. Совершенствование процесса функционального тестирования.
отчет по практике [50,5 K], добавлен 26.03.2012Сравнение эталонных моделей OSI, TCP. Концепции OSI: службы; интерфейсы; протоколы. Критика модели, протоколов OSI. Теория стандартов Дэвида Кларка (апокалипсис двух слонов). Плохая технология как одна из причин, по которой модель OSI не была реализована.
реферат [493,1 K], добавлен 23.12.2010Основные понятия IP телефонии, строение сетей IP телефонии. Структура сети АГУ. Решения Cisco Systems для IP-телефонии. Маршрутизаторы Cisco Systems. Коммутатор серии Catalyst 2950. IP телефон. Настройка VPN сети. Способы и средства защиты информации.
дипломная работа [1,1 M], добавлен 10.09.2008The principles of nonlinear multi-mode coupling. Consider a natural quasi-linear mechanical system with distributed parameters. Parametric approach, the theory of normal forms, according to a method of normal forms. Resonance in multi-frequency systems.
реферат [234,3 K], добавлен 14.02.2010Economic system. List by hands-on and hands-off. Types of economic systems. Market economy. Mixed economy. Planned economy. Traditional economy. Participatory economics. Changes of an economic situation in Russia. Recent economic developments.
реферат [15,0 K], добавлен 27.05.2007