"Revolution" , 㳿 Synchytrium Endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival

㳿 Synchytrium Endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival

㳿 . 䳿 . . .

,
12.12.2023
2,5 M

. ,

, , , , .

http://www.allbest.ru

-

㳿 Synchytrium Endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival

.. C

.. ʁC

.. ЁC

. , - . . , : _ , 273,5 FS (, 207 / + , 66,5 /), 450 SC (,75 /, + - , 375 /); _ Գ^, . ( Bacill'us subtilis, -7100 (26), 5 109/ ), , . ( Pseudomonas fluorescens . 33, 3,0 ? 109/3); _ 4--5--3,4-- 2-. EPPO Standards PM 7/28 (2), GPS- Garmin eTrex Legend. 㳿 . - 㳿 Coomassi blue G-250. 䳿 ( .. .) . 2019_2021 . 㳿 . 4--5-^- 3,4--2- 71,4%; , 273,5 FS -- 48,4%; 450 SC -- 82,3%. 䳿 Գ, . 25,8%; , . -- 32,3%. . 4--5- -3,4--2-, 3--5 㳿 .

; 㳿; ; ; ;

;

, [1]. , , . , . ( 330 ) ( 18 ) [2]. , , -- Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival [3].

() 38- . , , [4].

40 . Van de Vossenbeig ?.???. : S. endobioticum 1(D1)-- , ; 2(G1) -- ó (ͳ), 6(01) -- (ͳ) 18(T1) -- () [5].

[6]. 4 [7], 1940 . 18 (1), [8]. 糿 [9].

1 2022 . 5- 2337,96 [10].

. , , . , , [3].

1961 , 2003 -- ': 1(D1) -- ; 11(1) -- ̳; 13(R2) -- ; 18(Ya) -- , 22(B) -- , - [3].

: , , . [11-- 14] .

^ - .. .. : ̳ + Humat Ultra; + Humat Ultra; , . + Humat ; Paurin + Humat . 66--68% [15].

, 0,4 /; 5 /; , . 2 /; - 2 /; Գ, . 0,3 / 2,1--3,2 [16, 17]. 䳿 , [18].

.., .. .. - - Staphylococcus aureus 25922 Candida albicans 885-653 [19]. [20].

. 㳿 .

. 㳿 .

㳿 () () EPPO Standards PM 7/28 (2) [21]. , 0,5; 0,25 0,03 . 35% 1,1 3 3000 ./. . , 48,5%, 1,4 3 3000 ./. 㳿 , , (8 15) [22]. 㳿 0,5% G-250. 㳿 , -- [23].

䳿 :

4--5--3,4-- 2- -- , 쳿 - ; 1 /;

450 SC -- (,75 /, + , 375 /), 0,2 /;

, 273,5 FS -- , + (, 207 / + , 66,5 /), 0,5 /.

Գ, . ( Bacillus subtilis, -7100 (26), 5 109/ ), oo oo 䳿 , -- 0,5 /, .

^, . ( Pseudomonas fluorescens . 33, 3,0 109 3) -- , 0,3 /;

-- (0,4 /), .

䳿 - - . (S = 2) = 74,3 2, : 1 -- 0,0002 /1 ; 2 -- 0,0003 /1 ; 3 -- 0,0005 /1 , .

(. - .) (. 1).

:

-- ;

-- ( 20--25 );

-- ;

-- .

[24] :

=100( -- /),

㳿

: -- 䳿 ;

-- , , ;

-- .

䳿 - .

, 1, Statistica 5.

. 䳿 - 4--5--3,4--2- 15 㳿 . 10%. 䳿 72,3%.

䳿 , 273,5 FS 0,5 / 㳿 68,4%. 62 㳿 , , 25 . 30% .

䳿 Գ, . () 㳿 0,5 / 45 㳿 1 , 23,2% (. 2, 3). 80% (.).

, . 0,3 / . ϳ 䳿 62- 㳿 36 (.), 䳿 32,3%. 60% .

. 2. Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival (120)

. 3. , 0,5% G-25?i240')

450 SC 0,2 / (82,3%). , - () , - , , , 㳿 . 䳿 62- 11 (.). 㳿 (. 4), . 10%.

ij (0,4 /), , 98,8%. 4 - 㳿 . .

䳿 -, 㳿 ( , 2019--2021 .)

/

ʳ 㳿, ., (̓ym)

ʳ

,

.

,

.

%

䳿, %

1

( )

10

10

100

620,66

650,33

-4,8

2

4--5-- -3,4- (1 /)

10

8

20

620,66

210,33

75,8

3

450 SC (0,2 /)

10

1

10

620,66

110,33

82,3

4

, 273,5 FS (0,5 /)

10

3

30

620,66

250,66

58,6

5

Գ, . (0,5 /)

10

8

80

620,33

450,66

25,8

6

, .

(0,3 /)

10

6

60

620,33

420,33

32,3

7

() (0,4 /2)

10

0

0

620,66

40,66

98,8

ͲЁZ5

0,04

0,07

0,06

. 4. Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival (240)

. 5. ,

- -- , , . , 3--5 㳿 .

䳿 4--5- -3,4- (0,1 /) 75,8%. - 450 SC -- 82,3%. , 273,5 FS 48,4%, Գ, . -- 25,8%, , . -- 32,3%.

4--5--3,4- , 3--5 㳿 .

Գ: 12. - ( ); 0116U002555.

: .

.., .., .. . Գ . . : , 2012. 160 .

.., .., .. . : . ³. ͳ -- , 2021. 456 .

.. Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc., : . . . . : 06.01.11Գ. . , 2009. 24 . URL: https://www.academia.edu/67833156

Busse F. BartkiewiczA., Terefe-Ayana D. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic resources for marker development in Synchytrium endobioticum, an elusive but severe potato pathogen. Phytopathology. 2017. 107: 322-328. https://doi. orgnZ.l094/PHYTQ-05-16-0197-R

Van de VossenbergB.T.L.H., Prodhomme C., Vossen J.H, Van der Lee T.A. Synchytrium endobioticum, the potato wart disease pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2022. 23 (4). P. 461-474. https://doi.org /10.1111/mpp.13183

Qakir E., Demirci F. A new pathotype of Synchytrium endobioticum in Turkey: Pathotype 2. Bitki koruma bulteni. 2017.57(4) : 415-422. https://doi.org/ 10.16955/bitkorb.34044.1

Potocek J., Krajickovd K., Krejcar Z. Identification of new Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc. pathotypes in Czech Republic. Qchrana Rostlin. 1991/ 27. P. 191-205. URL: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.dofrecor- dID=CS9200002

PrzetakiewiczJ., Plich J. Assessment of the resistance to potato wart disease and pathotype identification Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb) Perc. In Poland. Plant Breeding and Seed Science. 2017. 78. P. 37-43. -https://doi.org /10.1515/ plass-2017-00019

Sikharulidze Z.V., Ghoghoberidze S., Mentink N. et al. Identification of the pathotype of Synchytrium endobioticum casual agent of potato wart disease, present in Georgia. Bulletin QEPP/EPPQ Bulletin. 2019. 49(2) P. 314-320. https://doi. org 10.1111/epp.12582

01.01.2021 . URL: http://www.consumer.gov.ua/ContentPages/Oglyad_ Poshirennya_Karantinnikh_Organizmiv_V_Ukraini/219

.. ³ - . ̳ . 2014. 60. . 220-225.

.. - : . .. . : 06.01.11Գ. . , 2021. 24 .

Zelya A., Zelya G., Qliynyk T., Pylypenko L., Solomiyciuk M., Kordu- lean R., Skoreyko A., Bunduc Y., Ghunchak ^ (2018). Screening of potato varieties for multiple resistance to Synchytrium endobioticum in the western region of Ukraine. Agricultural Science and Practice, 5(3), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.15407/ agrisp5.03.003

Zelya G.V., Qliynyk T.M., Kyryk M.M. The choice of wart varieties with complex resistance to wart and nematodes in western region of Ukraine and distinguishing sources of resistance. . 2017. 3 (67). https: doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi.2017.03.001

Gavryliuk A.T., Kyryk M.M. Tank mix additives biological preperations efficiency usage with other means against potato Alternaria blight. (5). P. 83-84. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.04.06.2021.016

.., .. - . : ̳ . ³: , 2020. . 44. . 110-117. (Google scolar).

., ., ˳ . . 2020. 66. . 17-30. https://doi.org/10.36495/1606- 9773.2020.66.17-30_

.., .., .. . . : () ̳ ' . : Ҳ 2020.. 211-215.

.., .” .. 4-^-1C6--3,4- -1-[3,4-]-2,5,7- . . 2016. . 771. . 69-72. URL: https://ru.scribd. com/document/327372225/NV-771-2016#fullscreen&from_embed

Kushnir O.V., Voloshchuk O.N., Marchenko M.M., Vovk M.V. Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of Ammonium Salts of 4-(3-Bromophenyl)-5- Methoxycarbonyl-1-(N,N-Dimethylaminopropyl)-3,4-Dihydropyrimidin-2- (1H)-One. Chemical Pharmasephtical Journal. 2015.V. 49, 5. . 515-518. URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11094-015-1318-5

EPPO Standards PM 7/28 (2) Diagnostic protocol for Synchytrium endobioticum. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 2017. V. 47. 3. . 420-440. https: doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9039-y

.., .., .., .. . . 2006. 21 .

Zelya A., Janse L., Janse J., Ghoghoberidze S., Zelya G., Korduleand R., Sikharulidze Z. Efficiency of detecting resting spores of Synchytrium endobioticum (potato wart disease) in infested sites of Ukraine and Georgia. Agricultural Science and Practice, 2021. 8(2), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp8.02.036

.., ѳ .., .. . . : , 2001. 448 .

1Zelya A., 2Kuchnir O.,

1Zelya G.,

1Makar T.,

3Vovk M.,

1Ukrainian Scientific Research Plant Quarantine Station Institute

of Plant Protection of NAAS, Boyany

2Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National UniversityChernivtsi,

3Institute of Organic Chemistry NAS Ukraine, Kyiv

Preparation of different origin impact on zoosporangium viability of potato wart causative agents Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival

Goal. To determine the technical efficiency of chemical, biological and new synthesized drugs in controlling the causative agen^ of po't^^o cancer. Methods. For research, soil samples we^e used, taken from the foci of the causative agent of cancer before and after treatment with the following drugs: chemical -- Emesto Quantum, 273.5 FS (clothianidin, 207 g/l + penflufen,

g/l), Consento 450 SC (phenamidon, 75 g/l, + propamocarb hydrochloride, 375 g/l); biological --Fitodoktor, p. (Bacill'us subtilis bacteria, IMV B-7100 (26D), titer 5 10 9/g of the drug), Planryz, genus. (Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria, piece AP 33, titer 3.0 109 cm3); synthesized -- onium derivatives of 4-aryl-5-methoxycarbonyl-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-one. Soil samples for the detection of pathogens from one soil sample were taken by standard methods according to EPPO Standards PM 7/28 (2), with the geolocation of the sampling points recorded by the Garmin eTrex Legend GPS navigator. Zoosporangia of the causative agent of cancer were isolated by flotation in the RUTA device in sodium iodide solution. The viability of zoosporangia was determined using Coomassie blue G-250 solution. The effectiveness of the drugs was determined according to the methods of testing and application of pesticides (Trybel S. and others). Results. Fo^ 2019--2021, the effect of chemical and biological preparations on the viability of zoosporangia of the causative agent of potato cancer was investigated. As a result of treatment with the synthesized chemical onium derivative 4-aryl-5-methoxycarbonyl-3,4-di- hydropyrimidin-2-one, the efficiency was 71.4%BG Emesto Quantum, 273,5 FS -- 48.4%; Consento 450 SC -- 82.3%. As a resul~t of the action of the biological drug FitoDocto^, the effectiveness was 25.8%; Planriz, genus. -- 32.3%. Conclusions. To protect potatoes from the disease, it is recommended to use biologicalandoniumderivativesof4-aryl-5-methoxycarbonyl-3,4-dihydropy- rimidin-2-one, which will allow to reduce the number of viable zoosporangia of the pathogen in the soil in 3--5 years and thereby reduce the pesticide press in potato growing and improve the ecological condition of the environment.

wart; zoosporangium; viability; preparations; testing; efficiency; improving

References

Melnyk P.O., Dankov V.Ia., Solomiichuk M.P. ta in. (2012). Fitosanitarna bezpeka.Oznaky sortovoi stiikosti prodovolchykh kultur proty rehulovanykh shkidlyvykh orhanizmiv. [Phytosanitary security. Agricultural crops variety features of resistance to regulated pests]. Kyiv. Ahrarna nauka, 160. (in Ukrainian).

Bondarchuk A.A., Koltunov V.A., Oliinyk T.M. ta in. (2021). Kartopliarstvo: metody otsinky yakosti. [Potato research; quality.evalaution techniques]. Vinnyt- sia. Nilan - LTD. 456. (in Ukrainian).

Zelya A H. (2009). Stiikist kartopli proty zbudnyka raku Synchytrium en- dobioticum (Schilb.) Perc., metody yoho vyiavlennia i dyferentsiatsii. [Potato resistance against the cancer pathogen Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc., methods of its detection and differentiation] : avtoref. dys. kand. biol. nauk : 06.01.11 Fitopatolohiia. Instytut bioresursiv ta pryrodokorystuvannia. Kyiv. 24. URL: https://www.academia.edu/67833156 (in Ukrainian).

Busse F.y Bartkiewicz A., Terefe-Ayana D. et al. (2017). Genomic and tran- scriptomic resources for marker development in Synchytrium endobioticum, an elusive but severe potato pathogen. Phytopathology. 107: 322-328. https://doi. org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-16-0197-R

Van de Vossenberg . T. L. H., Prodhomme C., Vossen J. H, Van der Lee T. A. (2022). Synchytrium endobioticum, the potato wart disease pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology. 23 (4). 461-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13183

Qakir E., Demirci F. (2017). A new pathotype of Synchytrium endobioticum in Turkey: Pathotype 2. Bitki koruma bulteni. 57(4) : 415-422. https://doi. org/10.16955/bitkorb.34044.1.

Potocek J., Krajickovd K., Krejcar Z. (1991). Identification of new Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Perc. pathotypes in Czech Republic. Ochrana Rostlin. 27. 191-205. URL: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.dofrecor- dID=CS9200002

Przetakiewicz J., Plich J. (2017). Assessment of the resistance to potato wart disease and pathotype identification Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb) Perc. In Poland. Plant Breeding and Seed Science. 78. 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ plass-2017-00019

Sikharulidze Z., Ghoghoberidze S., Mentink N. et al. (2019). Identification of the pathotype of Synchytrium endobioticum casual agent of potato wart disease, present in Georga. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 49(2). 314-320. https://doi.org 10.1111/epp.12582.

Ohliad poshyrennia karantynnykh orhanizmiv v Ukraini stanom na 01.01.2022. [Outlne of quarantine pests spread in Ukraine on 01.01.2022]. URL: http://www.consumer.gov.ua/ContentPages/Oglyad_Poshirennya_Karantinnikh_ Organizmiv_V_Ukraini/21. (in Ukrainian).

Melnyk A.T. (2014). Vidbir sortiv kartopli iz hospodarsko-tsinnymy oznakamy stiikykh proty alternariozu. [Potato varieties selection with economically value features against alternaria blight]. Mizhvidomchyi tematychnyi nau- kovyi zbirnyk Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. 60. S. 220-225. URL: https://www. academia.edu/51151124 (in Ukrainian).

HavryliukA.T. (2021). Alternarioz kartopli ta biolohichne obgruntuvannia zakhodiv obmezhennia yoho rozvytku v umovakh pivdenno-zakhidnoho liso- stepu Ukrainy. [Potato Alternaria Blight and Biological Basesfor Decreasing its Development in Southern-Western Ukrainian Foreststeppe] : avtoref. dys.kand. biol. nauk : 06.01.11 Fitopatolohiia. Instytut bioresursiv ta pryrodokorystuvan- nia. Kyiv, 24s. URL: https://www.academia.edu/51151124 (in Ukrainian).

Zelya A., Zelya G., Oliynyk T., Pylypenko L., Solomiyciuk M., Kordu- lean R., Skoreyko A., Bunduc ZCGhunchak ^ (2018). Screening of potato varieties for multiple resistance to Synchytrium endobioticum in the western region of Ukraine. Agricultural Science and Practice, 5(3), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.15407/ agrisp5.03.003

Zelya G.V., Oliynyk T.M., KyrykM.M. (2017). The choice of wart varieties with complex resistance to wart and nematodes in western region of Ukraine and distinguishing sources of resistance. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrainy. 3 (67). https: doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi.2017.03.001

Gavryliuk A.T., Kyryk M.M. (2021). Tank mix additives biological preper- ations efficiency usage with other means against potato Alternaria blight. Hraal nauky. (5). 83-84. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.04.06.2021.016

Andriichuk T.O., Skoreiko A.M. Elementy zakhystu kartopli vid fomoznoi hnyli. [Potato protection elements against phoma rot]. Kartopliarstvo: mizhvidomchyi tematychnyi naukovyi zbirnyk. Vinnytsia, TOV Tvory, 2020. Vyp. 44. S. 110-117. (in Ukrainian).

Andriichuk T., Skoreiko A., Lisnychyi ^ (2020). Obmezhennia poshyrennia latentnoi formy fomozu kartopli iz zastosuvanniam biofunhitsydiv. [Limitation of the distribution of the latent form of potato phomosis with the use of biofungicides]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. (66), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.36495/1606- 9773.2020.66.17-30 (in Ukrainian).

Andriichuk T.O., Skoreiko A.M., Melnyk A.T. ta in. (2020). Zastosuvannia preparatu Peroksyd M Ahro proty fomozu kartopli. [Preparation Peroxid usage potato phomosis]. Perspektyvy rozvytku rehionalnoho vyrobnytstva i zastosuvannia biolohichnykh zasobiv zakhystu roslyn vid shkidnykiv i khvorob : materialy mizhnarodnoho seminaru (onlain) z nahody Mizhnarodnoho roku zdorovia ro- slyn. 2020, 10-11 veres. 2020 r. Odesa: ITI Biotekhnika NAANU. 211-215. (in Ukrainian).

Kushnir O.V., Humenna A.V., Vovk M.V. (2016). Syntez 4-aryl-1,6-dial- kil-3,4-dyhidro-1N-pirolo[3,4-d] pirymidyn-2,5,7-tryoniv ta yikh bakterytsydna aktyvnist. [Synthesis of 4-aryl-1,6-dialkyl--3,4-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-d ] py- rimidine-2,5,7-triones and and their antifungal action].Naukovyi visnyk ChNU. V. 771. S. 69-72. URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/327372225/NV-771- 2016#fullscreen&from_embed (in Ukrainian).

Kushnir O.V., Voloshchuk O.N., Marchenko M.M., Vovk M.V (2015). Synthesis and Antioxidant Activity of Ammonium Salts of 4-(3-Bro- mophenyl)-5-Methoxycarbonyl-1-(N,N-Dimethylaminopropyl)-3,4-Dihydropy- rimidin-2-(1H)-One. Chemical Pharmasephtical Journal. V. 49(5). 515-518. URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11094-015-1318-5

EPPO Standards PM 7/28 (2) Diagnostic protocol for Synchytrium en- dobioticum. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 2017. V. 47 (3). . 420-440 https: doi. org/10.1007/s10658-006-9039-y

Zelia A.H., Melnyk P.O, Matskiv T.I., Pylypenko L.A. (2006). Vyiavlennia zbudnyka raku kartopli v ahrotsenozakh ta vantazhakh. [Determining potato wart causative agent in agrocenosis and weigths]. Metodychni rekomendatsii. 21. (in Ukrainian).

Zelya A., Janse L., Janse J., Ghoghoberidze S., Zelya G., Korduleand R., Sikharulidze Z. (2021). Efficiency of detecting resting spores of Synchytrium endo- bioticum (potato wart disease) in infested sites of Ukraine and Georgia. Agricultural Science and Practice, 2021. 8(2), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp8.02.036

Trybel S.O., Siharova D.D., Sekun M.P. et al. (2001). Metodyky vyprobu- vannia i zastosuvannia pestytsydiv. [Pesticides testing and usage techniques]. Kyiv: Svit, 448. (in Ukrainian).

Allbest.ru

...

  • . 䳿 , 7, 9, .

    [20,1 K], 28.04.2014

  • , . . . - .

    [3,1 M], 17.12.2011

  • , Potato spingle tuber viroid ( ())

    , - ' 㳿. - . . .

    [818,0 K], 20.11.2015

  • , : , , . . . , .

    [39,0 K], 01.07.2009

  • -

    㳿 . , , . .

    [596,9 K], 26.12.2012

  • -

    . , , - . , i.

    [1,5 M], 02.10.2014

  • . . .

    [3,6 M], 19.10.2013

  • . . , . .

    [38,3 K], 18.11.2010

  • 䳿 " "

    , . . , .

    [2,9 M], 18.07.2011

  • . 㳿 . - . .

    [61,1 K], 03.10.2014

  • , . , . .

    [104,4 K], 24.06.2011

  • . . . . .

    [32,8 K], 07.10.2010

  • -

    㳿 . - . .

    [31,8 K], 23.11.2010

  • ³

    . - . , . , . .

    [3,7 M], 03.08.2015

  • 䳿

    , , . , .

    [1,5 M], 05.09.2011

  • . , . , . .

    [531,8 K], 09.02.2011

  • . . , .

    [34,9 K], 26.10.2009

  • , . . .

    [1,9 M], 03.09.2015

  • ,

    . , . . .

    [133,2 K], 05.12.2013

  • "". , . , , . , .

    [457,6 K], 17.02.2012

, , ..
PPT, PPTX PDF- .
.

2000 2023,