Риторические фигуры созерцания в классическом и академическом изобразительном искусстве

48. Государственный Русский музей. Живопись: Первая половина XIX века: Каталог. Ред. тома Григорий Голдовский. 15 томов. СПб.: Palace Editions, 2002, т. 2.

49. Толбин, Василий. “О картине г. Иванова”. Сын отечества, no. 25 (1858): 710-3.

50. Боткин, Михаил, изд. Александр Андреевич Иванов: Его жизнь и переписка: 1806-1858 гг. СПб.: Тип. М. М. Стасюлевича, 1880.

51. Алленов, Михаил. Русское искусство XVIII -- начала XX века. 2-е изд. М.: Белый город, 2008.

52. Алленов, Михаил. “А. Иванов. `На берегу Неаполитанского залива'. (Картина природы и картина мира)”. В сб. Проблемы изобразительного искусства XIX столетия, ред. Нина Калитина и Иван Чечот, 36-56. Л.: Изд-во Ленинградского университета, 1990.

Rhetorical Figures of Viewing in Classical and Academic Art

A.G. Sechin

Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia,

48, r. Moyka emb., St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation

The article is a mirror for the author's work on the iconographic motif of Venus pudica. Like Venus, the image of a sleeping satyr from the famous Barberini Faun statue has become a figure of visual rhetoric in modern times, with a similar meaning of viewing the human body, but this time a male body. French artist Nicolas Poussin and Italian painter Giovanni Battista Pittoni used this recognizable iconic form to express a complex set of meanings, often in opposition to each other. In the arsenal of academic art, it has been applied in creating artistic images by Russian painters of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries: Anton Losenko, Andrei Ivanov, and his brilliant son Alexander. At first glance, this article only continues, using new material, the series of studies initiated by Aby Warburg (1866-1929) on visual patterns invented in antiquity that then became part of Modern art. However, unlike iconological studies, which only state such borrowings, the author examines these visual metaphors from the perspective of their internal form, which for a long time could hold and transmit important messages from the artist to others. The author believes that rhetoric from antiquity until the beginning of the nineteenth century (in Russia to the middle of the nineteenth century), and in academic art even later, held a leading position in the education of the artistic consciousness of masters of fine arts, and, directly or indirectly, in the management of practical activities -- even playing the role of art theory, which began to form as an independent discipline at the turn of the twentieth century.

Keywords: visual rhetoric, visual metaphor, rhetorical figures of viewing, Barberini Faun, Nicolas Poussin, Giovanni Battista Pittoni, Charles Le Brun, Anton Losenko, Andrey Ivanov, Alexander Ivanov.

References

1. Haskell, Francis, and Nicolas Penny. Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture, 1500-1900. 4th ed. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1994.

2. Sechin, Aleksandr. “Ikonograficheskii tip Venus Pudica kak plasticheskaia metafora zhenstvennosti v drevnem i novom iskusstve”. In Ros. akad. khudozhestv, Gos. in-t iskusstvoznaniia MK RF, Gos. muzei izobrazit. iskusstv im. A. S. Pushkina. Iskusstvo skul'ptury v XX-XXI vekakh: mastera, tendentsii, problemy, edited by Mikhail Busev, 452-63. Moscow: BuksMArt, 2017. (In Russian)

3. Stewart, Andrew. Art, Desire, and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

4. Stewart, Andrew. “A Tale of Seven Nudes: The Capitoline and Medici Aphrodites, Four Nymphs at Elean Herakleia, and an Aphrodite at Megalopolis”. Antichthon, no. 44 (2010): 12-32.

5. Spivey, Nigel. Greek Sculpture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

6. Neer, Richard. The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press, 2010.

7. Salomon, Nanette. “The Venus Pudica: Uncovering Art History's `Hidden Agendas' and Pernicious Pedigrees”. In Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts: Feminist Readings, edited by Griselda Pollock, 69-87. London [u. a.]: Routledge, 1996.

8. Berger, John. Ways of seeing: Based on the BBC Television Series with John Berger. London: Penguin Books, 1972. (Russ. ed.: Berger, Dzhon. Iskusstvo videt'. Translated by Evgeniia Shraga. St. Petersburg: Klaudberri, 2012).

9. Apulei. “Metamorfozy” i dr. sochineniia. Translated by Mikhail Kuzmin, compilled and prepared by Mikhail Gasparov. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1988.

10. Sechin, Aleksandr. “Favn Barberini. Grani ponimaniia obraza `prostodushnoi natury'” [“Barberini Faun. Understanding the image of `ingenuous nature'”]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 15. Arts 1, no. 4 (2011): 115-25. (In Russian)

11. Kunze, Christian. “Die Konstruktion einer realen Begegnung: zur Statue des Barberinischen Fauns in Mьnchen”. In Neue Forschungen zur hellenistischen Plastik. Kolloquium zum 70. Geburtstag von Georg Daltrop, Hrsg. Gerhard Zimmer, 9-47. Eichstдtt: Kastner, 2004.

12. Sorabella, Jean. “A Satyr for Midas: the Barberini Faun and Hellenistic Royal Patronage”. Classical Antiquity 26, no. 2 (2007): 219-48.

13. Newby, Zahra. Greek Myths in Roman Art and Culture: Imagery, Values and Identity in Italy, 50 BC -- AD 250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

14. Hemingway, Sean, and Richard Stone. “The New York Sleeping Eros: A Hellenistic Statue and Its Ancient Restoration”. Technй, no. 45 (2017): 47-63.

15. Smith, Roland R. R. Hellenistic Sculpture. London: Thames & Hudson, 1991.

16. Wьnsche, Raimund. Glyptothek Mьnchen. Meisterwerke griechischer und rцmischen Skulptur. Mьnchen: C. H. Beck, 2005.

17. Jouanny, Ch., ed. Correspondence de Nicolas Poussin. Paris: J. Schemit, 1911.

18. Blunt, Anthony. “Baroque and Antiquity: Introduction”, In Studies in Western Art, edited by Millard Meiss, 3-11. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963, vol. III: Latin American Art, and the Baroque Period in Europe.

19. Blunt, Anthony. Nicolas Poussin. 2 vols. New York: Pantheon Books, 1967.

20. Blunt, Anthony. “Poussin's notes on painting”. Journal of the Warburg Institute 1, no. 4 (1938): 344-51.

21. Careri, Giovanni. “Le retour du geste antique: amour et honneur а la fin de la Renaissance”. In Musйe Louvre service culturel, and Istituo italiano di cultura. La Jйrusalem dйlivrйe du Tasse. Poйsie, peinture, musique, ballet, edited by Giovanni Careri, 41-65. Paris: Klincksieck, 1999.

22. Tuillier, Jacques. Nicolas Poussin. 2 vols. Paris: Faton, 2015.

23. Lee, Rensselaer. “Ut Pictura Poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting”. The Art Bulletin 22, no. 4 (1940): 197-269.

24. Bober, Phyllis, and Ruth Rubinstein. Renaissance Artists and Antique Sculpture: A Handbook of Sources. 2nd ed. London: Harvey Miller Publishers, 2010.

25. Unglaub, Jonathan. Poussin and the Poetics of Painting: Pictorial Narrative and the Legacy of Tasso. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

26. Daniel', Sergei. Stat'i raznykh let. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2013. (In Russian)

27. Careri, Giovanni. Gestes d'amour et de guerre. Paris: Йditions de l'Йcole des hautes йtudes en sciences sociales, 2005.

28. Wollheim, Richard. Painting as an Art: The A. W Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts 1984: Bollingen series XXXV*33. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

29. Gombrich, Ernst H. “The Style all'Antica: Imitation and Assimilation”. In Studies in Western Art, edited by Millard Meiss, 31-41. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963, vol. 2: The Renaissance and Mannerism.

30. Aristotel'. “Ritorika”. Translated by Nadezhda Platonova. In Antichnye ritoriki, edited by Aza Takho- Godi, 15-164. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1978. (In Russian)

31. Dodero, Eloisa. “Rubens e il dialogo con l'antico”. In Rubens e la nascita del Barocco: Catalogo della mostra (Milano, Palazzo Reale, 26 ottobre 2016 -- 26febbraio 2017), a cura di Anna Lo Bianco, 71-83. Milano: Marsilio, 2016.

32. Iaremich, Stepan. “Kartiny vtorostepennykh ital'ianskikh masterov XVIII veka”. Starye gody, July -- September (1916): 42-8. (In Russian)

33. Fomicheva, Tamara. Venetsianskaia zhivopis` XIV-XVIII veka: katalog kollektsii. Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1992. (In Russian)

34. Kaganovich, Abram. Anton Losenko i russkoe iskusstvo serediny XVIII stoletiia. Moscow: Izd-vo Akademii khudozhestv SSSR, 1963. (In Russian)

35. Moiseeva, Svetlana. “...K luchshim uspekham i slave Akademii”: Zhivopisnye klassy Sankt-Peterburgskoi Akademii khudozhestv v XVIII -- pervoi polovine XIX veka. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2014. (In Russian)

36. Mannlich, Johann Christian, von. Ein deutscher Maler und Hofmann: Lebenserinnerungen des Joh. Christian v. Mannlich, 1741-1822. Ьbersetzer und Herausgeber Eugen Stolbreither. Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler und Sohn, 1910.

37. Pushkin, Aleksandr. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Edited by Nikolai Skatov. 20 vols. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2009, vol. 7. (In Russian)

38. Montagu, Jennifer. The Expression of the Passions: The Origin and Influence of Charles Le Bruns Confйrence sur l'expression gйnйrale et particuliиre. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1994.

39. Le Brun, Charles. L'Expression des passions et autres confйrences. Йditeur Benoоt Heilbrunn. Paris: Pocket, 2018.

40. Bryson, Norman. Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancien Rйgime. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

41. Gosudarstvennyi Russkii muzei. Zhivopis': XVIII vek: Katalog. Edited by Grigorii Goldovskii. 15 vols. St. Petersburg: Palace Editions, 1998, vol. 1. (In Russian)

42. Stewart, Andrew. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. 2 vols. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1990, vol. 1.

43. Sechin, Aleksandr. “Klassicheskaia ritorika v kartine Aleksandra Ivanova `Iosif, tolkuiushchii sny za- kliuchennym s nim v temnitse vinocherpiiu i khlebodaru'” [“Classical rhetoric in Alexander Ivanov's painting `Joseph interpreting the dreams of the cup-bearer and the baker'”]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 15, Arts 4, no. 3 (2014): 121-37. (In Russian)

44. Gosudarstvennaia Tret'iakovskaia galereia. Zhivopis' pervoi poloviny XIX veka: [Painting of the First Hale of the 19th Century]. Compilled by Olga Allenova, edited by Iakov Bruk. Moscow: SkanRus, 2005. (In Russian)

45. Korovkevich, Sof'ia. Andrei Ivanovich Ivanov: 1775-1848. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1972. (In Russian)

46. Ivanov, Andrei. “Kartina. Ivanov A. I. Pokhishchenie Ganimeda. Nachalo XIX veka”. Muromskii is- toriko-khudozhestvennyi muzei: Kollektsii-online [Murom History and Art Museum: Collection-Online]. Accessed December 01, 2018. http://kamis.museum-murom.ru/items?info=654&sa-fund=30. (In Russian)

47. Presnov, Grigorii. “Antichnye reministsentsii v novom russkom iskusstve (Materialy dlia istorii rus- skogo klassitsizma po pamiatnikam Russkogo muzeia)”. In Russkii muzei. Khudozhestvennyi otdel. Materialy po russkomu iskusstvu, 221-33. Leningrad: Academia, 1928, iss. 1. (In Russian)

48. Gosudarstvennyi Russkii muzei. Zhivopis': Pervaia polovina XIX veka: Katalog [Painting. First Part of the 19th Century]. Edited by Grigorii Goldovskii. 15 vols. St. Petersburg: Palace Editions, 2002, vol. 2. (In Russian)

49. Tolbin, Vasilii. “O kartine g. Ivanova”. Syn otechestva, no. 25 (1858): 710-3. (In Russian)

50. Botkin, Mikhail, publ. Aleksandr Andreevich Ivanov: Ego zhizn i perepiska: 1806-1858 gg. St. Petersburg: Tip. M. M. Stasiulevicha, 1880. (In Russian)

51. Allenov, Mikhail. Russkoe iskusstvo XVIII -- nachala XX veka. 2nd ed. Moscow: Belyi gorod, 2008. (In Russian)

52. Allenov, Mikhail. “A. Ivanov. `Na beregu Neapolitanskogo zaliva'. (Kartina prirody i kartina mira)” In Problemy izobrazitelnogo iskusstva XIX stoletiia, edited by Nina Kalitina and Ivan Chechot, 36-56. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1990. (In Russian)

Размещено на Allbest.ru