The Early Modern Genre of Cabinet in the Heritage of French Erudites

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru

The Early Modern Genre of Cabinet in the Heritage of French Erudites

A. Terenteva

The Renaissance era gave birth to a new phenomenon in the European intellectual culture -- the phenomenon of the cabinet of curiosities. Simultaneously, a new genre of the same name -- the genre of cabinet -- emerged in the Renaissance literature. Though not too popular, it assumed different forms under the pen of different authors. In France its usage was mostly connected with the erudite intellectual movement that had been formed during the reign of Francis I and flourished in the second half of the sixteenth and the first half of the seventeenth centuries. Interesting variants of the genre were provided by two prominent authors of the epoch -- an Arras clergyman Guillaume Gazet (1554-1612) and the future French royal historiographer Andrй Duchesne (1584-1640). Despite the difference between their social status and professions, both Gazet and Duchesne belonged to the French erudite movement. Having practically identical titles, “Cabinet of ladies” (“Cabinet des dames”), their works were published almost concurrently at the beginning of the seventeenth century and demonstrate two patterns of using the genre in the erudite intellectual circle. One of these patterns may be characterized as pure erudite, or antiquarian; the other -- as ethical, or moralistic. The peculiar use of the genre of cabinet in the French intellectual circles enables to emphasize certain distinguishing features of the French erudite movement in general, as well as to outline the specific features of the intellectual life of the French society in the Early Modern epoch.

Keywords: erudites, historical writing, historical genre, cabinet, Early Modern France, Andrй Duchesne, Guillaume Gazet.

Жанр кабинета в наследии французских эрудитов раннего Нового времени

Е.А. Терентьева

renaissance cultural heritage

Эпоха Возрождения породила новое явление в европейской интеллектуальной культуре -- феномен кабинета редкостей. Одновременно в ренессансной литературе возник одноименный жанр -- жанр кабинета. Не будучи, впрочем, слишком популярным, под пером разных авторов он принимал различные формы. Во Франции к нему прибегали преимущественно представители эрудитского интеллектуального течения, которое возникло во времена правления Франциска I и достигло расцвета во второй половине XVI -- первой половине XVII в. Любопытные варианты трудов указанного жанра вышли из-под пера двух выдающихся авторов той эпохи -- аррасского клирика Гийома Газе (1554-1612) и будущего королевского историографа Андре Дюшена (1584-1640). Несмотря на разницу в социальном положении и профессии, и Газе, и Дюшен принадлежали к французскому эрудитскому течению. Их работы, опубликованные почти одновременно, в начале XVII в., под практически одинаковыми заглавиями -- «Кабинет дам» -- демонстрируют два пути использования жанра в интеллектуальных кругах эпохи. Один из них можно обозначить как чисто эрудитский, или антикварный, второй -- как этический, или моралистский. Специфика использования жанра кабинета французскими интеллектуалами позволяет подчеркнуть как определенные характерные черты французского эрудитского течения, так и особенности интеллектуальной жизни французского общества в раннее Новое время в целом.

Ключевые слова: эрудиты, историописание, исторический жанр, кабинет, Франция раннего Нового времени, Гильом Газе, Андре Дюшен.

In the Early Modern epoch Europe saw an impressive rise of both humanities and exact sciences. However, by the beginning of the scientific revolution the borders between different fields of knowledge had been far from becoming impenetrable. Such integrity concerned in particular the humanities, and thus history, philology, moral philosophy, law, political and social thought mixed in the writings of Early Modern scholars in different proportions. Furthermore, even the belles-lettres were not considered as an area strictly isolated from the studies and scholarship; for example, literature and poetry were often blended with history in the minds of contemporaries Even at the end of the 18th century the novel “Astrйe” by Honorй d'Urfй, as well as “Princess of Cleves” by Madam de Lafayette were classified as histories. See, for example: Histoire // Dictionnaire Universel Franзois et Latin, vulgairement appelй Dictionnaire de Trйvoux. Nouvelle edition, corrigйe et consid- erablement augmentйe. Vol. 4. Paris, 1771. P. 840.. Combining scholarship with creation was a usual practice in the European intellectual circles in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

A vivid evidence of the described processes is provided by the intellectual movement of European erudites and antiquarians See, for example: Palamarchuk A., Fеdorov S. Antikvarnyi diskurs v rannestjuartovskoi Anglii. St. Petersburg, 2013.. These two denominations were used simultaneously with almost the same meaning, having specific affective evaluations in different countries See, for example: Fyodorov S. Consuming splendor: Society and culture in seventeenth-century England. By Levy Peck Linda // The Historical Journal. 2005. 51(1). P. 277-279.. Breaking with the tradition of medieval political histories erudites and antiquarians proceeded to studying the problems of the origins and history of peoples, laws, institutes, titles, customs and arts; they addressed the issues of coats of arms, discussed and elaborated on the matters of etymology, genealogy and philology at the same time. They used to deal with anything connected with the ethno-cultural peculiarity of their own countries.

In France during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the term “erudite” had been used for designation of an intellectual of the mentioned activities; the term “antiquary” was less common. In 1679 Jacob Spon defined their sphere of interests as “the knowledge about what the ancients wished to convey to their descendants about their religion, their sciences, their history, their policy through original monuments which they had left to us” Spon J. Rйponse а la critique publiйe par M. Guillet, Sur le Voyage de Grece de Iacob Spon. Avec quatre Lettres sur le mesme sujet, le Journal d'Angleterre du sieur Vernon, et la Liste des erreurs commises par M. Guillet dans son Athenes ancienne et nouvelle. Lyon, 1679. P. 63., i.e. the antiquities. The term “antiquities” included material remains of the past (coins, ruins, manuscripts, pictures, inscriptions, statues, medals, seals) and non-material substances such as institutes, offices, customs and titles.

Apart from the new subject area, the erudites and antiquarians developed a new research methodology. Changing the comprehension of historical evidence, they started using new types of original sources, such as archaeological material, and changed the practice of utilization of the written sources. Changes in historical knowledge in Early Modern Europe turned out to be so deep that in the third quarter of the twentieth century a pleiad of historians didn't hesitate to name these changes a historical revolution Preston J. H. Was there an Historical Revolution? // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1977. Vol. 38, no. 2 (April -- June). P. 353..

The special interest in vernacular past, vernacular history was characteristic of the European societies at the time. This interest, being a consequence of both intellectual and social processes, gave birth to new historical genres and revived already existing ones, such as chorographies, genealogies and genealogical histories, etc., which were used by the new “history writers” -- the erudites. In this intellectual circle a specific genre came into existence -- the genre of cabinet.

At the same time all the foregoing traits of Early Modern intellectual activities (both thematic and methodological) manifested themselves in a new phenomenon in the life of Renaissance Europe -- the phenomenon of the cabinet of curiosities. A sort of museum emerged. It received different names -- cabinet of curiosities, cabinet of antiquities, Kunstkammer -- and got an incredible popularity in sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe. The Renaissance brought the rise of lively interest not only in monuments of the past but also in pieces of art, wonders of nature (which may be characterized as objects relating to natural history) and exotic ethnographical items as well. Such encyclopedic collections at the same time demonstrated the high degree of integrity of European knowledge, the forming of a new taste for empiricism and rationalism and a new passion for collecting, but also were illustrative of the interest in antiquities.

One of the sixteenth century erudites, Claude Fauchet, wrote in 1581 that interest in the antiquity was then so vivid that most of the well-to-do people, “ however ignorant they were”, wished to represent it as far as possible: “some with books and medals, others with all the pieces they are able to recover” Fauchet C. Recueil de lorigine de la langue et poesie franзoise, ryme et romans. Plus les noms et sommaire des њuvres de CXXVII. poetes Franзois, vivans avant l'an M. CCC. Paris, 1581. P a.ij.. He also mentioned the passion of the “grand men” to decorate their cabinets with the material remains of the past Ibid..

Although in the past several decades a multitude of researches has been published in the field of the intellectual history and, in particular, concerning the French erudite movement, little attention has been paid to the different genres in the Renaissance scientific literature, and no research has been found that surveyed the Early modern erudite genre of cabinet. On the other hand, the notion of cabinet has been analyzed in the sense of a special place for keeping collections. At the beginning of the twenty-first century a special interest has arisen in the cabinets of curiosities as a sort of first museums, i. e. as a page of history of collecting, particularly in the French science The Origins of Museums: The Cabinet of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Europe / ed. by Oliver Impey and Arthur MacGregor. [S. l.], 2001; Schnapper A. Le gйant, la licorne et la tulipe. Les cabinets de curiositйs en France au XVIIe siиcle. Paris, 2012; Schlosser J. von. Les Cabinets d'art et de merveilles de la Renaissance tardive. Une contribution а l'histoire du collectionnisme. Paris, 2012; Po- mian K. Collectionneurs, amateurs et curieux. Paris; Venise, 1987; Mauriиs P Cabinets de curiositйs. Paris, 2002; Martin P., MoncondHuy D. Curiositй et cabinets de curiositйs. Neuilly, 2004; Marcoux C. N. Objets dйchanges et regards croisйs, entre l'Afrique de la Cфte-de-l'Or et l'Europe des Curiositйs (XVIe _ XVIIIe siиcles). Clermont-Ferrand, 2015; Impey O., Macgregor A. The origins of museums: the cabinet of curiosities in sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe. New York, 2001; Gargam A. Savoirs mondains, savoirs savants: les femmes et leurs cabinets de curiositйs au siиcle des Lumiиres // Genre & Histoire [En ligne]. 2009. 5. Automne. URL: http://genrehistoire.revues.org/899 (accessed 28.10.2017); Falguiиres P Les Chambres des merveilles. Paris, 2003; Davenne Ch. Modernitй du Cabinet de Curiositйs. Paris, 2004; Arnold K. Cabinets for the curious: looking back at early English museums. Burlington, 2006..

And yet the analysis of the use of the genre in France enables to emphasize certain distinguishing features of the French erudite movement in general, as well as to outline the specific traits of the intellectual life of the French society in the context of the culture of curiosity in Renaissance and Early Modern Europe.

The genre of cabinet seems to have emerged simultaneously with the coming into existence of the phenomenon of the cabinet of curiosities and to have been typologically very close to it. The genre didn't gain wide popularity in the French intellectual circles. The works with such titles published in France in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries may be easily quantified. However, the genre assumed specific forms under the pen of different authors.

Before proceeding to the classification and characterization of such works it seems useful to resort to the dictionaries of the epoch for the definition of the term “cabinet”. The widely known dictionary of Furetiere published in 1690 (at the end of the period in question, after the publication of the most part of the works analyzed in the present article) gave seven main meanings of the word “cabinet” in the following sequence:

- the most isolated place in the gala apartment of the palace;

- a small place in a private house, often formed not with a wall but with a partition, intended for studying or for keeping precious objects;

- a sort of a small pavilion in a garden;

- a cloakroom or a toilet;

- a store where curiosities of all kinds are kept, sold and changed; these may be ancient pieces, medals, paintings, shells and other curiosities of nature and objects of virtu. The dictionary of Furetiere also distinguished a particular case of such use of the word: “They say that the King and some of the nobles have Cabinets of books, of arms, of medals -- i. e. places where these objects are stowed, or the stored objects themselves”.

- a sideboard with many drawers;

- an element of the machinery of the absolutist state -- the Royal Cabinet (Cabinet du Roy) Dictionnaire Universel, Contenant generalement les Mots Franзois tant vieux que modernes, & les Termes de toutes les Sciences et des Arts. Recueilli & compilй par seu Messire Antoine Furetiere, Abbй de Chalivoy, de l'Academie Franзoise. Vol. 1. La Haye; Rotterdam, 1690. P. 300..

Later dictionaries and encyclopedias omitted several meanings from the above list Dictionnaire Universel Franзois et Latin, vulgairement appelй Dictionnaire de Trйvoux. Nouvelle йdition, corrigйe et considerablement augmentйe. Paris, 1771. Vol 2. P. 488-493.. But the most popular and widespread denotation of the term “cabinet” still seemed to be “a specific place” (in landscape architecture, interior and closely related to it meaning of an article of furniture).

Thus, we don't see any mentioning of the use of the word “cabinet” in connection with the writings of any kind. It appears interesting that the word “cabinet” as a literary genre has never been mentioned in the dictionaries of the Modern times.

However, in effect the genre of cabinet did exist. In sixteenth and seventeenth century France there emerged quite a variety of works in this genre, of which the Bibliothиque nationale de France has a quiet solid collection. They can be divided in four groups according to their subject areas.

The works describing the contents of some real cabinet, often of a politician or a man of letters, but sometimes of some private individual, form the first group of such papers Du Molinet Claude. Le cabinet de la bibliotheque de Sainte Genevieve. Divisй en deux parties. Paris, 1642, 1692; Le cabinet des beaux-arts, ou Recueil d' estampes gravйes d' aprиs les tableaux d'un plafond oщ les beaux-arts sontre prйsentйs. Avec l'explication de ces mкmes tableaux. Paris, 1690; L'inventaire du cabinet du sieur Toussaint Lauthier d'Aix en Provence, consistant en anciennes medailles, pierres precieuses, gravйes tant en creux qu'en bas relief; statues, tableaux, coquilles & plusieurs autres choses naturelles & artificielles. Aix, 1663; Spon Jacob. Discours sur une piиce antique et curieuse du cabinet de Jacob Spon. Representйe dans la planche suivante. Lyon, 1674; Barnaud Nicolas, Froumenteau Nicolas. Le cabinet du roy de France, dans lequel il y a trois perles prйcieuses d'inestimable valeur: par le moyen desquelles Sa Majestй s'en va le premier monarque du monde & ses sujets du tout soulagez. [S. l.], 1581; Mйmoires pour servir а l'histoire, tirйs du cabinet de messire Lйon Du Chastelier-Barlot depuis l'an 1596 jusques en 1636. Fontenay, 1643; Le Cabinet de Louis XI, contenant plusieurs fragments, lettres, missives, etc., de ce monarque et autres piиces curieuses / ed. by l' Hermite de Soliers, dit Tristan. Paris, 1661 (publication -- Paris: G. Quinet, 1681. 124 p.); Remontrance aux nouveaux mariйz et mariйes, et ceux qui dйsirent de l'efere. Ensemble pour connoitre les humeurs des femmes, trouvйes dans le cabinet d'une femme aprиs sa mort. Tours, 1644. Piиce; La cresme des bons vers: triez du meslange et cabinet des sieurs de Ronsard, du Perron, de Malerbe, de Sigongnes, de Lingendes, Motin, Maynard, de Bellon, St Urfe, Theophile et autres. Lyon, 1622; Le grand miroir des financiers tirй du cabinet des Curiositez, du Deffunct Cardinal de Richelieu, oщ lon void: I. L'Homme d'Estat en matieres d'Interests. II. L'ordre de manier les finances. III. Les moyens de faire profiter l'argent du Roy, l'avancement de la fortune des Intendants, & son declin. IV. Le discernement des Maltotiers d'avec les Officiers legitime de l'Espargne. V. Discours necessaire а tous Gens d'affaires & de finances. Paris, 1652.. Strictly speaking, not all the works of this group are entitled as “cabinets”; some titles contain such expressions as “the inventory of the cabinet” or “something got from the cabinet of.. .” L'inventaire du cabinet du sieur Toussaint Lauthier d'Aix en Provence, consistant en anciennes medailles, pierres precieuses, gravйes tant en creux qu'en bas relief; statues, tableaux, coquilles & plusieurs autres choses naturelles & artificielles. Aix, 1663.. There are two types of such works: the contents of the cabinet in question could be either material (antiquities or virtu) or manuscript (i.e. documents, letters, memoirs). The examples of the first case are numerous and include “The cabinet of the library of Saint-Genevieve”. The example of the second one is “The Cabinet of Louis XI” Le Cabinet de Louis XI. for official persons and “Reprimand to the newly married. found in the cabinet of a woman after her death” Remontrance aux nouveaux mariйz et mariйes, et ceux qui dйsirent de l'efere. Ensemble pour connoitre les humeurs des femmes, trouvйes dans le cabinet d'une femme aprиs sa mort. Tours, 1644. for private persons.

In the titles of the second large group of works in the genre of cabinet this term is used as a synonym of an anthology or collection. This group is connected with the belles-lettres and consists of anthologies of poetry of different kinds: either the selected works of the French poets or thematic collections of songs Le Gendre Marie. Cabinet des saines affections. Derniиre йdition augmentйe de XII Discours et quelques stances sur le mesme sujet. Par Madame de Rivery. Paris, 1595; Franeau Jean. Jardin d'hyver, ou Cabinet des fleurs, contenant en XXVI йlйgies les plus rares et signalez fleurons des plus fleurissans parterres. Douay, 1616.; Contant Paul. Le Jardinet Cabinet poйtique de Paul Contant, apoticaire de Poictiers. Poictiers, 1609; Carneau Etienne. La piece de cabinet, dйdiйe aux poлtes du temps. Paris, 1648; Rйgnier Mathurin: 1) Le cabinet satyrique ou recueil parfaict des vers piquants et gaillards de ce temps. Nouvelle йdition. Paris, 1613; 2) Le Cabinet satyrique, ou Recueil parfaict des vers piquans et gaillards de ce temps, tirй des secrets cabinets des sieurs de Sigogne, Rйgnier, Motin, Berthelot, Maynard et autres des plus signalez poиtes de ce siиcle. Paris, 1618; Nouveau cabinet des Muses, ou l'Eslite des plus belles poлsies de ce temps / ed. by De Lamathe. Paris, 1658; Le Parnasse des muses, ou Recueil des plus belles chansons а danser. Recherchйes dans le cabinet des plus excellens poлtes de ce temps. Dediй aux belles dames. Deuxiesme edition. Paris, 1628; Le cabinet des Muses, ou recueil des plus beaux vers de ce temps. Rouen, 1619; Nouveau cabinet des muses ou leslite des plus belles poйsies de ce temps / ed. by de La Mothe. Paris, 1658; Le nouveau cabinet des muses gaillardes. [S. l.], 1665; Le Cabinet des plus beles chansons nouvelles, tant de l'amourque de la guerre, recueillies des plus excellens poиtes franзois de ce temps et autres. Lyon, 1592; Le cabinet des plus belles chansons. Lyon, 1592; Le petit cabinet des chansons nouvelles et amoureuses. Recueillies de divers autheurs. Lyon, 1614..

The third group consists of the “pure erudite” cabinets which contain virtual collections of different kinds Pontier Gйdйon: 1) Le Cabinet ou La bibliothиque des grands, contenant des remarques et recherches surtous les йtats souverains, et plusieurs mйmoires de ce tems bien particuliers et trиs curieux. Histoire, chronologie, topographie, hydrographie, politique, armes, devises, merveilles et autres choses nobles. T. I. Paris, 1682; 2) La Continuation du Cabinet des grands, contenant les devises des empereurs d'Orient et d'Occident, expliquйes et enrichies de sentences, maxims d'Йtat et de traits d'histoire; les prophйties de S. Malachie touchant les papes depuis Cйlestin II jusqu'а la venue de l'Antechrist, et plusieurs choses remarquables de ce tems arrivйes en plusieurs cours et ailleurs. Avec la rйponse а la critique du Journal des savants de Lipsic sur les deux premiers tomes du Cabinet des grands. Paris, 1689; Waghenaer Lucas Janszoon. Thrй- sorerie ou Cabinet de la routte marinesque: contenant la description de l'entiиre navigation et cours de la Mer septentrionale d'Allemaigne, d'Angleterre et d'Escosse, France et Espaigne / nouvellement mis en lumiиre par l'expert et renommй pilote Lucas Jansz WagenaerAuxquelles sont adjoutйz certains discours et vйritables rйcits comme on peult navigant environner la terre. Item cincq moyens, routtes ou erres de mer pour venir en China, un traictй de la variation du quadran de mer, certaines questions concernant la navigation, le commerce des marchandises en l'Inde orientale et quelles denrйes on apporte de lа en ces pays par deзa. Calais, 1601; Du Chesne A. Figures Mystiques du Riche et precieux Cabinet des Dames ou sont representйes au Vif, tant les Beatez Parures et Pompres du Corps Feminin: que les Perfections, Ornemens et Atours Spirituels' de l'Ame. Paris , 1605; Assignies Jean d'. Cabinet des choses plus signalйes advenues au sacrй ordre de Cysteau, signamment des vies et histoires de plusieurs saints prйlats d'iceluy, recueillies de divers livres tant escrits qu'imprimez et mis en langage vulgaire, par F. Jan d'Assignies. Douai, 1598; Camus Jean-Pierre. Le Cabinet historique, remply d'histoires veritables, arriveйs tant de dans que dehors le royaume, avec les moralitez. Paris, 1668; Le Comte Florent. Cabinet des singularitez d'architecture, peinture, sculpture et graveure, ou Introduction а la connoissance des plus beaux arts figurй sous les tableaux, les statues et les estampes. In 3 vols. Paris, 1699-1700; Monnier I.-L. Le Cabinet secret des grands prйservatifs et spйcifiques propres, contre la peste, fiиvres pestilentielles, pourpres, petites vйrolles, et toutes sortes de maladies contagieuses. Paris, 1666. -- from various problems of navigation Waghenaer Lucas Janszoon. Thrйsorerie ou Cabinet de la routte marinesque... to the erudite research of the nobility Pontier Gйdйon: 1) Le Cabinet ou La bibliothиque des grands.; 2) La Continuation du Cabinet des grands ..

Finally, the last, fourth group, is formed of the so-called “mystical cabinets” -- works of moralistic character containing morals and being congeneric with both didactic and religious literature of the epoch Saint-Samson Jean de. Le cabinet mystique; contenant les regles de la conduite des ames religieuses. Divisй en deux parties. 1. La conduite des novices. 2. Regles pour discerner les divers esprits, de grace, de nature, & du Demon. Rennes, 1655; Blois Louis de. Cabinet de l'вme fidelle, oщ sont contenus le Miroir spirituel, la Bague spirituelle, la Couronne spirituelle, le Coffret spirituel. Escrit par Loys de Blois, abbй du monastиre de Liessies. Traduit du latin en franзais par Jacques Froye, religieux de l'Ordre de Saint-Benoist а Liessies. Nouvellement reveu et corrigй mesme quant au langaige. Douay, 1596; Gazet G. Le Cabinet des dames: contenant l'ornement spirituel de la femme, fille, & Vefue Chrestienne. Plus Le Cabinet de la Vierge consacree а Dieu par le voeu de Chastetй. Avec un Calendrier Historial des Sainctes & vertueuses Dames. Dediй aux Dames d'honneur de la Serenissime Infante d'Espagne etc. Par M. Guill. Gazet Chanoine d'Aire, & Pasteur de S. Marie Magdelaine а Arras. Arras, 1602; Niclot Simon. Le petit cabinet des vierges et ames chastes. Composй des sentences & pensйes tant de la Ste. Ecriture, que des Saints et anciens Peres de l'Eglise. Par le R. P. Simon Niclot, religieux Minime. Reims, 1649; Mougne Roberte (veuve de JйrфmeBelon). Le Cabinet de la vefve chrestienne, contenant priиres et mйditations sur divers sujets de l'Escriture saincte. Sedan, 1648; Le Jau Jean. Cabinet royal de lespoux meublй par son espouse, avec le Jardin spirituel, divisй en huict discours, auquel est adjoustйe l'Oraison funиbre. Йvreux, 1631..

Some works unite the traits of two or more groups, being, for example, a collection (“cabinet”) of poems and at the same time a part of a material cabinet of some person Rйgnier Mathurin. Le Cabinet satyrique....

Despite the medium or even little popularity of the genre of cabinet in France in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the titles of these works (apart from the literary ones) were rather diverse. However, two papers stand out from the lists of works of the third and fourth groups by their similar titles including the expression “the cabinet of ladies”. These are “The Cabinet of ladies containing the spiritual ornament of the Christian wife, girl and widow; and also the Cabinet of the virgin devoted to God by the vow of chastity. With a Historic Calendar of Saint and virtuous ladies. Dedicated to ladies-in-waiting of the Serene Infanta of Spain” by Guillaume Gazet Gazet G. Le Cabinet des dames: contenant l'ornement spirituel de la femme, fille, & Vefue Chres- tienne. Plus Le Cabinet de la Vierge consacree а Dieu par le voeu de Chastetй. and “The mystical figures of the rich and precious Cabinet of ladies where the beauties, finery and adornments of the feminine body as well as the spiritual perfections, ornaments and attires of the soul are vividly represented” Du Chesne A. Figures Mystiques du Riche et precieux Cabinet des Dames ou sont representйes au Vif. by Andrй Duchesne. Besides the likeness of titles, the two works were published almost simultaneously, in the first decade of the seventeenth century. Hence, the comparison of these incarnations of the genre of cabinet is especially interesting.

Andrй Duchesne (1584-1640) was called by his successors “the father of the French history”, and he surely deserved this title. He started his erudite career rather early (the first publication dated from 1602). Later he got the office of the royal geographer and historiographer, published more than thirty works and left dozens of unpublished papers on various historical and geographical subjects, from genealogical histories and the history of French cardinals to the description of antiquities of the French kingdom. The investigated subjects as well as the specific methods of research characterize Duchesne as an erudite For more information on Andrй Duchesne see: Terenteva E. A., Palamarchuk A. A. Rozhdenie nat- sional'nogo istoriopisaniya vo Frantsii: trudy i istoricheskiy metod Andre Dyushena // Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. History. 2015. Issue 2. P. 80-92; Pronina E. A.: 1) Istoriya na sluzhbe u korolya i kardi- nala: otets i syn Dyusheny // Klio. 2011. N 2 (53). P. 39-43; 2) “Ottsy istorii” Frantsii i Velikobritanii: Andre Dyushen i Uilyam Kemden (k voprosu o zarozhdenii natsional'nogo istoriopisaniya v stranakh Evropy ran- nego novogo vremeni) // Klio. 2012. N 2 (62). P. 86-88..

Guillaume Gazet (1554-1612) seems to be a stranger in the modern historiography, not having become a subject of interest to scholars yet. Born in Arras in 1554, he was appointed parish priest of the church of Sainte-Marie-Madeleine in Arras around 1580, and later combined this office with the office of a canon of the collegiate church of Saint-Pierre in Aire-sur-la-Lys Niceron R. P Mйmoires pour servir а l'histoire des hommes illustres dans la rйpublique des lettres. Avec un catalogue raisonnй de leurs ouvrages. T. 43. Paris, 1745. P. 271-276.. Since 1589 up to the end of his life he had been publishing different works as an author, editor or translator. Surely his priesthood had an impact on his heritage adding a spiritual shade to it. Nevertheless, his sphere of interest characterizes him as an erudite, as well as the French language of his works enables to ascribe him to the French erudite circle despite the official Spanish status of Arras at that time. The list of his works shows his connection with the French erudite movement of the epoch, because apart from several purely ecclesiastical writings he mostly dealt with quite “erudite” problems G. Gazet published more than a dozen of works. Most of them were of his own: Magdalis. Comoe- dia sacra. Douai, 1589; Chanson nouvelle pour l'heureux succez de l'armйe catholicque ensemble, de la prinse des ville et chasteau de Calais. Arras, 1596; Lordre et suite des evesques et archevesques de Cambray. Arras, 1597; Lordre des evesques d'Arras depuis la separation de leveschй de Cambray. Arras, 1598; Lordre et suyte des evesques de Cambray et d'Arras. Arras, 1598; Briиve histoire de la sacrйe manne et de la sainte chandelle miraculeusement donnйes de Dieu et religieusement conservйes en la ville et citй d'Arras. Arras, 1598; Le cabinet des Dames: contenant l'ornement spirituel de la femme. Arras, 1602; Le consolateur des ames scrupvleuses. Arras, 1610; Tableaux sacrez de la Gaule Belgique. Arras, 1610; La Bibliotheque Sacree du Pays-Bas. Arras, 1610; L'Histoire ecclйsiastique des Pays-Bas. Arras, 1614. G. Gazet also translated two ecclesaistical works (Androzzi Fulvio. Devot memorial des saints mysteres de la mort et passion de nostre sauveur et redempteur Jesus Christ. Arras, 1595 (reissued -- Douai, 1599); Balbano Bernardino de. Le sacre mystere de la flagellation de nostre sauveur. Arras, 1595) and acted as a scientific editor (Various authors. Thesaurus precum et litaniarum. Arras, 1601; Metaphrastes Simeon. Histoire de la vie, mort, passion et miracles des saints. Arras, 1584 (reissued -- Arras, 1596; Douai, 1598); Niceron R. P Mйmoires pour servir а l'histoire des hommes illustres dans la rйpublique des lettres. Avec un catalogue raisonnй de leurs ouvrages. T. 43. Paris, 1745. P 271-276.. Thus, the two “cabinets” may be regarded as creations by the members of a common intellectual circle.

As for their form, in both cases the material was organized systematically, which was characteristic of most erudite works. The tables of contents of both works could remind the reader the structure of a cabinet-bureau: “The general enumeration of the riches locked up in this present Cabinet of ladies” (Duchesne's) and “Table of contents of the cabinet of wife; of widow; of girl; of the veiled nun” (Gazet's). Nevertheless, in terms of themes they don't bear resemblance.

Both works were connected with the sphere of morality, and their titles emphasized the ethical aspect of the contents. However, as it could have been anticipated, the work of a secular writer, A. Duchesne, resembles a sermon far less than the text written by a clergyman. Although the title of Duchesne's cabinet, in contrast to Gazet's, contains the term “mystical”, in fact it turned out to be much worldlier.

History and morality had been closely intertwined in the mind of a European in the Early Modern epoch. For a long time studying history had been highly recommended for the education of the nobles of both sexes in order to cultivate moral principles and to instill self-perfection Bourquin L. La noblesse dans la France moderne (XVIe -- XVIIIe siйcles). P. 115.. In addition, we can conclude that Duchesne had made the most of this phenomenon, basing his “mystic cabinet” on the didactic stories from the past and thus trying to emphasize the superiority of the spiritual beauty over the temporal one.

While Gazet's work aimed at the regulation of women's behavior and was based on the Christian moral philosophy, Duchesne's “cabinet” pursued another goal. Despite the declarations and specific rhetoric (we shouldn't forget that the Paris theology doctors approved of Duchesne's work in 1604 Approbation des docteurs // Du Chesne A. Figures Mystiques du Riche et precieux Cabinet des Dames ou sont representйes au Vif, tant les Beatez Parures et Pompres du Corps Feminin: que les Perfections, Ornemens et Atours Spirituels' de l'Ame. Paris, 1605.) the essence of his work concerned explaining the symbolism (though mostly spiritual), the origins and the history (Biblical, antique or barbarian) of perception of the feminine beauty, elements of costume and accessories. The advice given to the fair readers by Duchesne are not perceived as the essentials of his book -- in contrast to the moralistic sentences and warnings of Gazet, who also had decorated his narrative with the examples of the ancient and medieval history.

Thus, despite the unity of genre, the similarity of titles and declared objectives, and even the similar audience (both works were devoted to noble women), the works of Duchesne and Gazet mostly demonstrated two different patterns of use of the genre of cabinet. The one chosen by Duchesne could be characterized as erudite; the one chosen by Gazet -- as ethical, or moralistic. However, borders between them didn't seem impenetrable.

Thus, the genre of cabinet was not extremely widespread in Early Modern France though it can be considered as rather characteristic of the epoch and, therefore, deserves study and analysis.

The most general definition of it could be “a collection of anything that could be presented in a written form”, though such works often acquired distinctive features and even could be classified in four groups. In contrast to the material cabinet of curiosities, the cabinet as a genre not only enumerated objects but also provided the reader with proper characteristics and commentaries.

A large part of the erudite and antiquarian heritage was tightly connected with the social and political processes taking place in Early Modern Europe, such as the formation of the absolute monarchies, the rise of ethno-cultural identities and the religious controversies. Nevertheless, certain fields of erudite studies still remained sufficiently autonomous from the politics. The genre of cabinet mostly demonstrates the latter trend in the erudite thought.

As for the use of new methods and the spreading rationalism of the Europeans, the particularity of the genre of cabinet emphasized the value of collecting antiquities and -- moreover -- of systematizing material. Though Descartes reproached the contemporary researchers in the field of humanities for not having a system, this reproach might have been rejected by the erudites who had had a taste for systematizing, and the metaphor of cabinet with lots of small drawers perfectly conveyed the specificity of the erudite research.

The genre of cabinet didn't end with the Renaissance and Early Modern era. It was developed later, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries -- there emerged a number of reviews and collected works with such titles For example: Le Cabinet des fйes, ou Collection choisie des contes des fйes, et autres contes merveilleux. In 8 vols. Genиve; Paris, 1785-1789; Cabinet des modes, ou les modes nouvelles, dйcrites de maniиre claire et prйcise, et reprйsentйes par des planches en taille-douce, enluminйes: ouvrage qui donne une con- noissance exacte & prompte, tant des habillemens & parures nouvelles des personnes de l'un & de l'autre sexe, que des nouveaux meubles de toute espиce, des nouvelles dйcorations, embellissemens d'appartemens,. The genre lost its moralistic and descriptive features and remained in the area of anthologies and collections of knowledge concerning certain subjects. It become a usual practice in the twentieth century and hasn't come out of use up to the contemporary times, though in the sphere of pure science, to be more precise -- the sphere of humanities.

References

1. Arnold K. Cabinets for the curious: looking back at early English museums. Burlington, Ashgate Publ., 2006, 297 p.

2. Berger G. Genres bвtards: roman et histoire а la fin du XVIIe siиcle. Dix-septiиme siиcle, 2002/2 (no. 215), pp. 297-305.

3. Bourquin L. La noblesse dans la France moderne (XVIe -- XVIIIe siиcles). Paris, Belin Publ., 2002, 267 p. Davenne Ch. Modernitй du Cabinet de Curiositйs. Paris: L'Harmattan Publ., 2004, 299 p.

4. Dear P., Shapin S. Nauchnaia revoliutsiia kak sobytie. Moscow, NLO Publ., 2015, 576 p. (In Russian)

5. Eco U. Evoliutsiia srednevekovoi estetiki. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2004, 288 p., ill. (In Russian) Eco U. Iskusstvo krasota v srednevekovoi estetike. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 2003, 256 p. (In Russian) Falguiиres P. Les Chambres des merveilles. Paris, Bayard-Centurion Publ., 2003, 140 p.

6. Fyodorov S. Consuming splendor: Society and culture in seventeenth-century England. By Levy Peck Linda. The Historical Journal , 2005, 51(1), pp. 277-279.

7. Grafton A. What was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 319 p.

8. Grell Ch. L'histoire entre йrudition et philosophie. Etude sur la connaissance historique а l'вge des Lumiиres. Paris, Presses Universitaires Francais, 1993, 415 p.

9. Marcoux C. N. Objets d'йchanges et regards croisйs, entre l'Afrique de la Cфte-de-l'Or et l'Europe des Curiositйs (XVIe-XVIIIesiиcles). Clermont-Ferrand, Universitй Blaise Pascal Press, 2015, 132 p.

10. Martin P., Moncond'Huy D. Curiositй et cabinets de curiositйs. Neuilly, Atlande Publ., 2004, 202 p.

11. Mauriиs P. Cabinets de curiositйs. Paris, Gallimard Publ., 2002, 259 p.

12. Neuschel K. B. Word of Honor: Interpreting Noble Culture in Sixteenth-Century France. New York, Cornell University Press, 1989, 223 p.

13. Palamarchuk A., Fedorov S. Antikvarnyi diskurs v rannestiuartovskoi Anglii. St.Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 2013, 210 p. (In Russian)

14. Parry G. The Trophies of Time. English Antiquarians of the Seventeenth century. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 2007, 382 p.

15. Pomian K. Collectionneurs, amateurs et curieux. Paris; Venise, XVIe -- XVIIIe siиcles Publ., Gallimard, 1987, 376 p.

16. Preston J. H. Was there an Historical Revolution? Journal of the History of Ideas, 1977, vol. 38, no. 2 (April -- June), pp. 353-364.

17. Pronina E. A. Istoriia na sluzhbe u korolia i kardinala: otets i syn Diusheny. Klio, 2011, no. 2 (53), pp. 39-43. (In Russian)

18. Pronina E. A. “Ottsy istorii” Frantsii i Velikobritanii: Andre Dyushen i Uilyam Kemden (k voprosu o za- rozhdenii natsional'nogo istoriopisaniia v stranakh Evropy rannego novogo vremeni). Klio, 2012, no.2 (62), pp. 86-88. (In Russian)

19. Schlosser J. von. Les Cabinets dart et de merveilles de la Renaissance tardive. Une contributionа l'histoire du collectionnisme. Paris, Macula Publ., 2012, 372 p.

20. Schnapper A. Le gйant, la licorne et la tulipe. Les cabinets de curiositйs en France au XVIIe siиcle. Paris, Flammarion Publ., 2012, 768 p.

21. Terenteva E. A., Palamarchuk A. A. Rozhdenie natsional'nogo istoriopisaniia vo Frantsii: trudy i istoricheskii metod Andre Diushena. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. History. 2015, issue 2, pp. 80-92. (In Russian) nouvelles formes de voitures, bijoux, ouvrages dorfйvrerie, & gйnйralement de tout ce que la mode offre de singulier, d'agrйable ou d'intйressant dans tous les genres. Paris, 1785.

Размещено на Allbest.ru