Investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises in Poltava region

Theoretical bases of investment attractiveness of the enterprise. Influence of natural, economic, financial, social, legal and political factors on the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Opportunities to attract investment resources.

Рубрика Экономика и экономическая теория
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 11.05.2018
Размер файла 211,4 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises in Poltava region

Shtepenko E.P.

Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University

Annotation

investment attractiveness agricultural

In the article, the theoretical basis of the explanation of investment attractiveness is considered and internal and external factors that influence its level are identified. The influence of natural, economic, financial, social, legal, and political factors on the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises in Poltava region is detected. Keywords: investment attractiveness, investment climate, investments, agricultural enterprises.

Штепенко К.П.

Полтавський національний технічний університет імені Юрія Кондратюка

ІНВЕСТИЦІЙНА ПРИВАБЛИВІСТЬ СІЛЬСЬКОГОСПОДАРСЬКИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ПОЛТАВСЬКОЇ ОБЛАСТІ

У статті розглянуті теоретичні основи інвестиційної привабливості підприємства та визначено внутрішні й зовнішні чинники, що впливають на її рівень. Встановлено вплив природних, економічних, фінансових, соціальних, правових та політичних факторів на інвестиційну привабливість сільськогосподарських підприємств Полтавської області.

Ключові слова: інвестиції, інвестиційна привабливість, інвестиційний клімат, сільськогосподарські підприємства.

Штепенко Е.П.

Полтавский национальный технический университет имени Юрия Кондратюка

ИНВЕСТИЦИОННАЯ ПРИВЛЕКАТЕЛЬНОСТЬ СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫХ ПРЕДПРИЯТИЙ ПОЛТАВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ

В статье рассмотрены теоретические основы инвестиционной привлекательности предприятия и определены внутренние и внешние факторы, влияющие на ее уровень. Установлено влияние природных, экономических, финансовых, социальных, правовых и политических факторов на инвестиционную привлекательность сельскохозяйственных предприятий Полтавской области.

Ключевые слова: инвестиции, инвестиционная привлекательность, инвестиционный климат, сельскохозяйственные предприятия.

Problem statement

The modern socioeconomic conditions of the state, production stagnation, shortage of funds of enterprises cause a need for investment resources. Domestic practice testifies that investments arrive very slowly to some regions or industries over the low return of capital employed and a big number of risks. Thus, an investor faces a task of a careful selection of investment object given the present investment climate in the region and the country as a whole, as well as investment attractiveness of enterprises of a certain industry.

A problem of development of investment process is becoming relevant in the context of ensuring the effective functioning of agriculture, its exit from a critical condition, and establishing the production of competitive products. Poltava region has a sufficient number of preconditions for forming investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises; however, given a lot of unsolved issues, existent investment flows do not allow full use of the existent potential.

Analysis of recent studies and publications

In the scientific literature, a lot of works are devoted to the study of investment processes, in particular, analysis of investment support is considered by M.Yu. Kozhemiakina, L.V. Smolii; investment problems -- by L.A. Svystun, N.A. Mazur, V.M. Hrynova, T.I. Lepeiko, V.O. Koiuda; assessment of investment efficiency -- Yu.M. Khvesyk, assessment of investment activities -- I.P. Boreiko; investment attractiveness forecasting -- M.O. Orlikovskyi, theoretical aspects of investment attractiveness -- A.F. Hukaliuk, I.M. Ivanovych; S. Mah- dych, A.M. Tretiak, V.M. Druhak, D.P. Romanska, S.V. Onyshchenko, and others.

The purpose of the research. The purpose of the article is an analysis of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region for the purpose of revealing factors, which are favourable to the investment process, and factors, which restrain investment flow to the region's enterprises.

Statement of basic material

In the scientific literature, an issue of determining the essence and interrelation of concepts «investment climate» and «investment attractiveness» remains debating.

A.S. Muzychenko notes that concepts «invest- ment climate» and «investment attractiveness» have a similar essence as they provide a maximum consideration of many factors that make an influence on making investment decisions and future realization of investment projects. At the same time, the concept «investment climate» is used when analysing investment situation at the country level as a whole. And in terms of decision-making on choosing a place (a variant of placement) of future investment, a research of investment attractiveness of regions is used [1].

A.A. Peresada denies the possibility of assessing the investment attractiveness at the level of the state or region, focusing his attention on the relevance of using this indicator only for characterizing a particular enterprise. This can be explained by the fact that the national economy (economy of the state) consists of a set of economic entities, which are of interest to investors from the capital investing positions. Regarding individual sectors and regions, these groups, for the most part, have no functions of economic entities [2].

S.O. Yevtushenko points that delimitation of the categories of «investment climate» and «in- vestment attractiveness» has no absolute character. On the one hand, the general state of the investment climate in the country not directly but significantly affects the assessment of the enterprise's investment attractiveness. On the other hand, investment attractiveness of the enterprise forms an appropriate investment microclimate, which is largely created by existing management model that may be a factor contributing to the investment implementation and a factor that inhibits their inflow [3].

Assessing the significance of the advantages and disadvantages of the outlined scientific points of view, at the level of enterprises of agriculture, we believe it necessary to consider their investment attractiveness as a set of characteristics of its production, commercial, financial, managerial activities, and features of investment climate as well, showing the feasibility of investment in it.

Investment attractiveness has a dual nature. On the one part, it is subjective as is connected with an individual judgement of the investor who strives for the realisation of his concrete goals. On the other part, it exists objectively and is predetermined by a state of external and internal terms of the operation of an industrial enterprise. Factors that determine the level of investment attractiveness of the enterprise can be classified into two big groups -- external and internal. External are factors of the external environment of the enterprise that are formed at the level of the country, region, and branch. Internal factors of the enterprise depend on its financial and economic as well as business activities [4].

When studying investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region according to the first group of factors, there is provided their assessment by such six generalized factors: natural, economic, financial, social, legal, and political.

Natural factors. Poltava region has an advantageous physical-geographic position, plain relief, and moderate continental climate, which creates the necessary conditions for effective agriculture. In the structure of land fund of the region, 90% is occupied by black soil, and thus an experience of managing the earth was formed over tens of generations. Natural conditions determined an agricultural specialization of Poltava region, in particular, in crop production -- beet cultivation and grain production, and in cattle breeding -- meat- and-dairy cattle farming along with pig breeding.

Economic factors. In 2015, agriculture of Poltava region consisted of 2373 enterprises of a market type, including large-scale enterprises -- 3, medium -- 170, small -- 2200, and micro -- 1957 enterprises [5].

In accordance with data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, the total volume of agricultural products sold of Ukraine in 2015 was 372033.4 million hryvnia, and in 2014 -- 220163.3 million hryvnia [6]. Comparing to 2014, the agriculture of Ukraine received 70% growth of the total volume of agricultural products sold.

The total volume of agricultural products sold in Poltava region in 2015 was 34730.7 million hryvnia, in 2014 -- 16918.43 million hryvnia [5]. It should be noted that the total volume of agricultural products sold in Poltava region also increased in 2 times comparing 2015 to 2014.

The existent potential of agricultural enterprises in conjunction with favourable natural conditions creates necessary preconditions for the efficient development of the branch in the region and attraction of investment resources. However, outdated technology, constant shortage of fuel, fertilizers, environmentally-friendly crop protection agents, and lack of sufficient funds to buy them reduce the actual performance of economic entities to the minimum possible.

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Financial factors. Over the studied period, agricultural enterprises are mostly profitable; data are presented in Table 1. At the same time, an absence of a stable trend of increasing revenue and profitability of agricultural enterprises should be mentioned.

The level of profitability of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region over the studied period is very low and consists 10-13%. A number of enterprises receiving profits vary every year.

Such a financial result of activity shows extremely narrowed internal capabilities of agricultural enterprises on investment in fixed assets and need for the attraction of external financing (investments, loans, etc.).

A dynamics of amounts of capital investment by economic activity in the economy of Poltava region and agriculture for the 2010-2015 years shown in Table 2 proves the made conclusions. In a trend of reducing the amount of investment by almost 29% in comparison with 2014 can be observed. Amounts of capital investments in the agriculture of Poltava region also declined by 47% in 2015 in comparison with 2014 and amount only to 53%.

It should be noted that the situation in 2016 is changing. For the period of January-December the volume of capital investment in the economy of Poltava region in comparison with 2015 increased by 1.74 times, and in agriculture -- 3.75 times.

Let us study the dynamics of volumes and indexes of foreign direct investments in agriculture of Poltava region for the period of 2010-2016 years presented in Table 3.

Dynamics of volumes of capital investment in the economy of Poltava region, namely, in agriculture, shows an unstable character of volumes of investments and a small share of foreign direct investment in agriculture in an aggregate amount of such investments. In particular, foreign direct investments in Ukraine at the end of 2016 make 36 154.5 thousand USD, in 2015 -- 45 916.0 thousand USD. The volume of foreign direct investment in Ukraine reduced by 9 761.5 thousand USD, i.e. by 21%.

Foreign direct investments in agriculture of Ukraine for the period of January-Decem- ber 2016 in comparison with 2015 reduced by 91.9 thousand USD and make 502.2 thousand USD. However, the share of foreign direct investment in agriculture in total investment increased in Janu- ary-December 2016 comparing to 2015.

Dynamics of foreign direct investment in Ukraine for the period of 2010-2016 years is shown in Figure 1.

Thus, the attraction of external financing of activities of agricultural enterprises does not ensure establishing efficient economic management and solving the main problems over the low volume of investments. For financial credit institutions and investors, the first and foremost is an issue of rapid repayment of funds and availability of a minimum number of risks that is almost impossible in modern terms of the development of the agriculture, where a balanced approach and longtermness of investment of capital are necessary.

Legal and political factors. A group of legal and political factors is related and interdependent. At the level of regions, they manifest themselves almost equally, given the mandatory compliance with the current legislation by all subjects in the state. Current regulations provide satisfactory conditions for the improvement of the investment climate. Experts note that a bigger part of the investor's risks is related to unexpectedness of changes of legislation, and about 50% of risks are caused by imperfectness of the state policy in the field of agro-industrial complex, which actions are inadequate in market conditions and do not give agricultural producers an opportunity to predict for the future doing their own business activity, and investors -- to be sure in the return on investment. Besides general state trends of the influence of studied factors, one should point out the presence of regional differences, given the conditions created by local authorities. In particular, in Poltava region, programs of promoting business development, fuel sector development, optimal use of available energy sources, agricultural production development, investment attraction etc. became widespread.

Summing up the research of external factors of influence on the formation of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises, one can note a favourable physico-geographical position of the region for the branch development; however, the large number of problems reduces the number of people willing to invest in the development of activities of agricultural enterprises.

The next stage of the analysis is the research of internal factors of formation of the enterprise investment attractiveness. In the economic literature, there is a wide variety of opinions concerning their essence. The most of the analysed approaches envisage a selection of indicators financial and economic activity of the enterprise calculated on data of accounting and financial statements. However, at the stage of evaluation of the level of the enterprise attractiveness to the investor, experts in the field of investment occupy a dual position. On the one hand, they affirm that attractive for investors are those enterprises that are profitable, and on the other -- enterprises that have some material and technical basis but are not able to take and fulfil obligations due to lack of working capital, energy intensity of production, lack of qualified personnel, and so on.

For the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region, a method of score evaluation on the basis of integral indicator proposed by O.I. Hutorov and K.M. Kramarenko [9] taking into account the author edition of some groups of indicators. The basis of the method consists of an allocation of five levels of investment attractiveness of the enterprise (Table 4), and an assignment of an economic entity to one or another group is a result of evaluation of calculated indicators of financial and economic activity on a 100-point scale. Such estimation is assigned based on the fact whether one or another indicator has reached the standard value and(or) whether trends of change of indicator values correspond to desired or standard values.

Table 4

Characteristics of score evaluation of investment attractiveness of the enterprise

Scores

The level of investment attractiveness of the enterprise

Characteristics

90-100

High degree of investment attractiveness

Excellent financial status

80-89

The enterprise is investment-attractive

God enough financial status, the enterprise with a minimal risk

60-79

Middle investment attractiveness

Satisfactory financial status

40-59

Minimal investment attractiveness

The enterprise has an insufficient level of solvency, high risk level

0-39

The enterprise is not investment-attractive

Unsatisfactory financial status, investment in such an enterprise is very risky

Table 5

Financial indicators of some agricultural enterprises of Poltava region

Group of in-dicators and their signifi-cance, %

Indicators in groups and their significance, %

Stand-

ard

value

STOV «Kalyna»*

STOV «Khliborob»*

STOV «Liubava»*

2014

year

2015

year

2014

year

2015

year

2014

year

2015

year

Property status, 10

Depreciation to fixed assets ratio, 40

min

0,62

0,64

0,23

0,34

0,42

0,6

Fixed asset renewal ratio (Ко), 30

max

0,04

0,61

0,24

0,04

0,09

0,54

Fixed asset retirement rate (Кв), 30

Кв<Ко

0,13

0,002

0,13

0,03

0,14

0,001

Liquidity, 15

Current ratio, 30

>2,0-2,5

1,95

1,39

1,85

1,99

1,62

1,35

Quick ratio, 30

>0,6-0,8

1,05

1,21

0,4

0,91

0,88

1,07

Absolute liquid ratio, 30

>0,2

0,002

0,0006

0,009

0,03

0,001

0,0001

Working capital, 10

>0, max

7284

13424

1555

2846

16757,3

19454

Financial stability, 20

Debt ratio, 20

>0,5,max

0,001

0,0004

0,02

0,01

0,0001

0,0001

Financing ratio, 20

<1,min

1,92

0,58

2,54

2,11

1,47

0,69

Working capital to current assets ratio, 12

>0,1,max

0,48

0,27

0,43

0,5

0,32

0,24

Current assets to equity ratio, 12

>0,max

0,49

0,64

0,33

0,47

0,41

0,48

Financial leverage ratio, 12

<1,min

0,52

1,71

0,39

0,47

0,85

1,44

Sustainable growth rate, 12

max

0,18

0,27

-0,08

0,21

0,11

0,11

Debt-to-equity ratio, 12

<1,min

0,53

1,73

0,39

0,47

0,89

1,5

Business ac-tivity, 15

Asset turnover ratio, 15

max

0,45

0,38

0,33

0,71

0,49

0,54

Turnover rate of payables, 10

max

2,54

1,89

1,07

2,47

4,86

2,57

Receivable turnover, 10

max

1,25

0,6

2,28

3,37

1,42

1,12

Inventory turnover, 15

max

1,41

2,22

1,09

1,89

1,51

2,35

Return on assets ratio, 15

max

0,73

0,86

2,81

17,6

2,08

2,63

Equity turnover), 15

max

0,64

0,83

0,4

1,02

0,82

1,14

Operating cycle

min

550

772

494

301

498

480

Cash conversion cycle

min

407

579

153

154

423

338

Profitability,

20

Return on assets, 30

>0,max

0,17

0,14

0,06

0,08

0,07

0,05

Return on margin, 35

>0,max

0,36

0,56

0,18

0,4

0,01

0,16

Return on equity ratio, 35

>0,max

0,16

0,31

-0,07

0,23

0,12

0,11

Investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region is determined and given in Table 5 that includes information on dynamics of the main indicators of operation of three agricultural enterprises of Hadiatskyi and Dykanskyi raions. Data of the table show that the most investment-attractive one among all analysed entities is STOV «Khliborob». It can be assigned to the group of enterprises with a middle investment attractiveness (it is characterised by good enough financial status and minimal investment risks). STOV «Kalyna» has middle investment attractiveness, considering a satisfactory financial status. STOV «Liubava», according to the results of the research, can be assigned to enterprises with a minimal investment attractiveness (the enterprise has an insufficient level of solvency, high level of risks of non-return of investment).

Conclusions

The conducted research testifies about insufficient investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises of Poltava region according to the assessment of both external and internal factors. The following problems restrain investment flow in the industry of the region: uncertainty of possibilities of investment resources attraction; unsatisfactory technical condition of enterprises of the branch; low labour productivity; high level of crop shortfall risk (and thus profit) in relation to the branch's significant dependence on climatic conditions; complexity and low reliability of assessment of economic efficiency of investments. The unattractiveness of investment projects in agriculture is also determined by the fact that such projects have a much longer payback period and lower level of profitability in comparison with other spheres of the economy; high cost and long implementation periods of projects predetermine high level of investment risks.

Along with this, it should be noted that the branch has good development prospects due to the importance of agricultural production in guaranteeing food security of the region; potential export opportunities, taking into account that volumes of consumption of production of this sector continue to grow in developed countries; presence of a strong scientific base; significant potential and a wide range of crops and livestock that are in demand in the consumer market; presence of direct support for the development of this sector by regional authorities, and so on.

References

1. Muzychenko A.S. Investytsiina diialnist v Ukraini. Navchalnyi posibnyk / A.S. Muzychenko. - К.: Kondor, 2005. - 406 s.

2. Peresada А.А. Investytsiinyi protses v Ukraini / А.А. Peresada. - К.: «Vydavnytstvo Libra», 1998. - 392 s.

3. Yevtushenko S.O. Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni faktory pidvyshchennia investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia k.e.n. - Kharkiv, 2001. - 19 s.

4. Koshelok H.V. Vnutrishni faktory ta rezervy rostu investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia k.e.n. - Odesa, 2010. - 24 s.

5. Holovne upravlinnia statystyky u Poltavskii oblasti [Elektronnyi resurs]. - Rezhym dostupu: www.pl.ukrstat. gov.ua

6. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [Elektronnyi resurs]. - Rezhym dostupu: www.ukrstat.gov.ua

7. Pidsumky rozvytku ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Poltavskoi oblasti [Elektronnyi resurs]. - Rezhym dostupu: www.apk.poltava.ua

8. Svystun L.A. Investytsiini protsesy v ahrarnomu sektori ekonomiky Ukrainy v konteksti zabezpechennia ii prodovolchoi bezpeky / L.A. Svystun, А.А. Rozhko // Ekonomichnyi prostir. - 2015. - № 104. - S. 134-146. - Rezhym dostupu: www.nbuv.gov.ua

9. Hutorov О.І. Otsinka investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv / О.І. Hutorov, K.M. Kramarenko // Ekonomika APK. - 2009. - № 10. - S. 69-73.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

  • Theoretical aspects of investment climate in Ukraine. The essence of investment climate. Factors that forming investment climate. Dynamics of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Ukraine. Ways of improving the mechanism of attracting foreign investment.

    курсовая работа [155,2 K], добавлен 19.05.2016

  • The essence of agrarian relations: economic structure and specificity. The land rent, land price as a capitalized rent. History of the formation of agricultural sector of Ukraine, its reforms. Assessment of the investment attractiveness of AIC of Ukraine.

    курсовая работа [1,1 M], добавлен 04.01.2016

  • Investments as an economic category, and their role in the development of macro- and microeconomics. Classification of investments and their structure. Investment activity and policy in Kazakhstan: trends and priorities. Foreign investment by industry.

    курсовая работа [38,8 K], добавлен 05.05.2014

  • Establishing a favorable environment for investments, removing administrative barriers. Establishing high-technology parks. Formation of financial mechanisms to attract and support investments, tax stimulation measures. Brand promotion of Russian regions.

    реферат [15,9 K], добавлен 04.06.2013

  • Government’s export promotion policy. Georgian export promotion agency. Foreign investment promotion. Government’s foreign investment promotion policy. Foreign investment advisory council. Taxation system and tax rates in Georgia.

    курсовая работа [644,0 K], добавлен 24.08.2005

  • The essence of economic efficiency and its features determination in grain farming. Methodology basis of analysis and efficiency of grain. Production resources management and use. Dynamics of grain production. The financial condition of the enterprise.

    курсовая работа [70,0 K], добавлен 02.07.2011

  • The definition of term "economic security of enterprise" and characteristic of it functional components: technical and technological, intellectual and human resources component, information, financial, environmental, political and legal component.

    презентация [511,3 K], добавлен 09.03.2014

  • Analysis of the causes of the disintegration of Ukraine and Russia and the Association of Ukraine with the European Union. Reducing trade barriers, reform and the involvement of Ukraine in the international network by attracting foreign investment.

    статья [35,7 K], добавлен 19.09.2017

  • Resources of income for enterprises. Main ways of decreasing the costs Main ways of increasing the income. Any enterprise’s target is to make profit. In order to make it a company should understand where comes from the income and where goes out costs.

    курсовая работа [59,9 K], добавлен 09.11.2010

  • Short and long run macroeconomic model. Saving and Investment in Italy, small open economy. Government expenditure and saving scatterplot. Loanable market equilibrium in closed economy in the USA. Okun’s Law in the USA and Italy, keynesian cross.

    курсовая работа [1,6 M], добавлен 20.11.2013

  • The stock market and economic growth: theoretical and analytical questions. Analysis of the mechanism of the financial market on the efficient allocation of resources in the economy and to define the specific role of stock market prices in the process.

    дипломная работа [5,3 M], добавлен 07.07.2013

  • Directions of activity of enterprise. The organizational structure of the management. Valuation of fixed and current assets. Analysis of the structure of costs and business income. Proposals to improve the financial and economic situation of the company.

    курсовая работа [1,3 M], добавлен 29.10.2014

  • The global financial and economic crisis. Monetary and financial policy, undertaken UK during a crisis. Combination of aggressive expansionist monetary policy and decretive financial stimulus. Bank repeated capitalization. Support of domestic consumption.

    реферат [108,9 K], добавлен 29.06.2011

  • The influence of the movement of refugees to the economic development of host countries. A description of the differences between forced and voluntary migration from the point of view of economic, political consequences. Supply in the labor markets.

    статья [26,6 K], добавлен 19.09.2017

  • Organizational structure of "Samruk-Kazyna" JSC. Formation of financial resources of the Fund. Mining and power assets directorate. The characteristic stages of the process of registration of new legal entities. Cash flow from the operating activity has.

    отчет по практике [2,6 M], добавлен 02.02.2015

  • Natural gas market overview: volume, value, segmentation. Supply and demand Factors of natural gas. Internal rivalry & competitors' overview. Outlook of the EU's energy demand from 2007 to 2030. Drivers of supplier power in the EU natural gas market.

    курсовая работа [2,0 M], добавлен 10.11.2013

  • Stereotypes that influence on economic relations between the European Union countries and Russia. Consequences of influence of stereotypes on economic relations between EU and Russia. Results of first attempts solving problem. General conclusion.

    реферат [19,0 K], добавлен 19.11.2007

  • The use of computers in education. Improvements in health, education and trade in poor countries. Financial education as a mandatory component of the curriculum. Negative aspects of globalization. The role of globalization in the economic development.

    контрольная работа [57,9 K], добавлен 13.05.2014

  • General characteristic of the LLC DTEK Zuevskaya TPP and its main function. The history of appearance and development of the company. Characteristics of the organizational management structure. Analysis of financial and economic performance indicators.

    отчет по практике [4,2 M], добавлен 22.05.2015

  • Thematic review of the characteristics of each factor of production. The theories of main economists. The possible variants of new factors of production. Labor resources. "Elementary factors of the labour-process" or "productive forces" of Marx.

    реферат [437,4 K], добавлен 18.10.2014

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.