Трансформации режимов правительности под влиянием новых областей знания: случай поведенческой экономики

Давление современных когнитивных наук на либеральные представления об автономии, а также расширение спектра «психологических» инструментов, используемых для управления населением, обостряют вопрос о совместимости базовых политических категорий и новых технологий управления. Для поведенческой публичной политики производство свободы больше не является центральной технологией управления, что сближает её с авторитарными формами власти, направленными на «послушных» субъектов. Проделанный анализ позволяет предположить, что в будущем новые знания о человеческой природе пошатнут баланс между либеральными и авторитарными компонентами правительности, причём далеко не в пользу идеалов свободы.

Литература

1. Капелюшников Р И. 2018. Вокруг поведенческой экономики: несколько комментариев о рациональности и иррациональности. Журнал экономической теории. 15 (1): 359-376.

2. ЦСР. 2018. В ЦСР состоялся семинар по регуляторик. Центр стратегических разработок. URL: https:// www.csr.ru/ru/news/v-tssr-sostoyalsya-seminar-regulyatorike/

3. Коммерсант. 2019. Центробанк предложил перенести реформу пенсионных накоплений. Коммерсант. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4027507

4. Beddeleem M. 2018. Fighting for the Mantle of Science: The Epistemological Foundations of Neoliberalism, 1931-1951. Phd Thesis. Montreal: University of Montreal.

5. Berg N. 2003. Normative Behavioral Economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 32 (4): 411-427.

6. Berndt C. 2015. Ruling Markets: The Marketization of Social and Economic Policy. Environment andPlanning. 47 (9): 1866-1872.

7. Blumenthal-Barby J. S. 2013. Choice Architecture: A Mechanism for Improving Decisions While Preserving Liberty. In: Coons C., Weber M (eds) Paternalism: Theory andPractice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 178-196.

8. Bossaerts P., Murawski C. 2015. From Behavioural Economics to Neuroeconomics to Decision Neuroscience: The Ascent of Biology in Research on Human Decision Making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 5: 37-42.

9. Bradbury A., McGimpsey I., Santori D. 2013. Revising Rationality: The Use of `Nudge' Approaches in Neoliberal Education Policy. Journal of Education Policy. 28 (2): 247-267.

10. Gordon C. 1991. Governmental Rationality: An Introduction. In: Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1-53.

11. Callon M. 2007. What Does It Mean to Say That Economics is Performative? In: MacKenzie D., Muniesa F., Siu L. (eds) How Economists Make Markets. The Performativity of Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 311-357.

12. Callon M. 2008. Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From Prosthetic Agencies to “Habilitated” Agencies. In: Pinch T., Swedberg R. (eds). Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 29-57.

13. Camerer C. et al. 2003. Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for “Asymmetric Paternalism“. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 151: 1211-1254.

14. Carolan M. 2018. Big Data and Food Retail: Nudging out Citizens by Creating Dependent Consumers. Geoforum. 90: 142-150.

15. Costa D. F., Carvalho F., Moreira B. C. 2019. Behavioral Economics and Behavioral Finance: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Fields. Journal of Economic Surveys. 33 (1): 3-24.

16. Cromby J., Willis M. E. H. 2014. Nudging into Subjectification: Governmentality and Psychometrics. Critical Social Policy. 34 (2): 241-259.

17. Dean M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.

18. Dean M. 2014. Rethinking Neoliberalism. Journal of Sociology. 50 (2): 150-163.

19. Edgecliffe-Johnson A. 2019. Why American CEOs are worried about capitalism. Financial Times. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/138e103a-61a4-11e9-b285-3acd5d43599e

20. Eggers W., Turley M. 2019. Government Trends Introduction. Deloitte. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/ en/insights/industry/public-sector/government-trends/2020/introduction.html

21. Engelmann S. 2017. Nudging Bentham: Indirect Legislation and (Neo-)Liberal Politics. History of European Ideas. 43 (1): 70-82.

22. Exley S. 2012. Making Working-Class Parents Think more Like Middle-Class Parents: Choice Advisers in English Education. Journal of Education Policy. 28 (1): 77-94.

23. Foucault M. 1982. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry. 8 (4): 777-795.

24. Foucault M. 1991. Governmentality. In: Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 87-105.

25. Foucault M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collиge de France, 1978-1979 (eds. A. Davidson, G. Burchell). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

26. Gazzaniga M. S. 2011. Who 's in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. London: Harper Collins.

27. Galle B. D. 2019. The Problem of Intra-Personal Cost. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics. 18 (1): 1-56.

28. Geiger N. 2016. Behavioural Economics and Economic Policy: A Comparative Study of Recent Trends. Њconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy. 6 (1): 81-113.

29. Hagen S. H. 2016. “Nudging to Make the Best Choicesfor Themselves”: The Paradox ofBehavioural Economics and Neoliberalism in the SBST 2015 Annual Report (Bachelor thesis). Utrecht: Utrecht University.

30. Hansen P. G. 2016. The Definition of Nudge and Libertarian Paternalism: Does the Hand Fit the Glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation. 7 (1): 155-174.

31. Inman P. 2019. Economics Nobel prize won by academics for tackling poverty. World news. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/14/economics-nobel-prize-abhijit-banerjee-esther-

32. duflo-michael-kremer

33. John P. 2018. How Far to Nudge? Assessing Behavioural Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

34. Jones R., Pykett J., Whitehead M. 2013. Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

35. Jones R., Whitehead M. 2018. `Politics done Like Science': Critical Perspectives on Psychological Governance and the Experimental State. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 36 (2): 313-330.

36. Kahneman D. 2003. Maps ofBounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review. 93 (5): 1449-1475.

37. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. 1991. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5 (1): 193-206.

38. Khan A. 2018. Behavioral Approach to Financial Supervision, Regulation, and Central Banking. Working Paper. No. 18/178. Washington: IMF.

39. Kosters M., Heijden J. van der. 2015. From Mechanism to Virtue: Evaluating Nudge Theory. Evaluation. 21 (3): 276-291.

40. Leggett W. 2014. The Politics of Behaviour Change: Nudge, Neoliberalism and the State. Policy and Politics Journal. 42 (1): 3-19.

41. Lemke T. 2007. An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 8 (2): 43-64.

42. Lemke T. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: NYU Press.

43. Mannevuo M. 2019. Neuroliberalism in Action: The Finnish Experiment with Basic Income. Theory, Culture & Society. 36 (4): 27-47.

44. Mayes C. 2014. Governing through Choice: Food Labels and the Confluence of Food Industry and Public Health Discourse to Create `Healthy Consumers'. Social Theory & Health. 12 (4): 376-395.

45. McMahon J. 2015. Behavioral Economics as Neoliberalism: Producing and Governing Homo Economicus. Contemporary Political Theory. 14 (2): 137-158.

46. McNay L. 2009. Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault's The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society. 26 (6): 55-77.

47. McSmith A. 2010. First Obama, Now Cameron Embraces “Nudge Theory”. Independent. URL: http://www. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/first-obama-now-cameron-embraces-nudge-theory-2050127.html

48. OECD. 2019. Delivering Better Policies Through Behavioural Insights. URL: https://www.oecd.org/gov/ regulatory-policy/delivering-better-policies-through-behavioural-insights-6c9291e2-en.htm

49. Opitz S. 2010. Government Unlimited: The Security Dispositif of Illiberal Governmentality. In: Brцckling U., Krasmann S., Lemke T. (eds) Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 93-115.

50. Peeters R. 2019. Manufacturing Responsibility: The Governmentality of Behavioural Power in Social Policies. Social Policy and Society. 18 (1): 55-65.

51. Peeters R., Schuilenburg M. 2017. The Birth of Mindpolitics: Understanding Nudging in Public Health Policy. Social Theory & Health. 15 (2): 138-159.

52. Pykett J. 2017. Brain Culture: Shaping Policy Through Neuroscience. Bristol: Policy Press.

53. Rizzo M. J. 2015. The Problem of Rationality: Austrian Economics between Classical Behaviorism and Behavioral Economics. In: Coyne C. J., Boettke P. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. New York: Oxford University Press; 364-393.

54. Rose N. 1996. Governing Advanced Liberal Democracies. In: Barry A., Osborne T., Rose N. (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and the Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press; 37-64.

55. Rose N., Abi-Rached J. M. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

56. Rouvroy A., Berns T. 2013. Algorithmic Governmentality and Prospects of Emancipation. Rйseaux. 177 (1): 163-196.

57. Rowson J. 2011. Transforming Behavior Change: Beyond Nudge and Neuromania. RSA Report. URL: https:// www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/rsa-transforming-behaviour-change.pdf

58. Rushe D. 2019. The Kings of Capitalism are Finally Worried about the System that Created Them. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/24/ray-dalio-jamie-dimon-kings- of-capitalism-concerned

59. Schlag P. 2010. Nudge, Choice Architecture, and Libertarian Paternalism. Michigan Law Review. 108 (6): 913-924.

60. Schmidt A. T. 2017. The Power to Nudge. American Political Science Review. 111 (2): 404-417.

61. Schьll N. D., Zaloom C. 2011. The Shortsighted Brain: Neuroeconomics and the Governance of Choice in Time. Social Studies of Science. 41 (4): 515-538.

62. Sigley G. 2006. Chinese Governmentalities: Government, Governance and the Socialist Market Economy. Economy and Society. 35 (4): 487-508.

63. Sugden R. 2018. The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist's Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

64. Sunstein C. R. 2015. Choosing Not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.

65. Thaler R., Sunstein C. 2008a. Human Frailty Caused this Crisis. Financial Times. URL: https://www.ft.com/ content/ac2839ac-b015-11dd-a795-0000779fd18c

66. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. 2008b. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

67. Valverde M. 2007. Genealogies of European States: Foucauldian Reflections. Economy and Society. 36 (1): 159-178.

68. Vos J. D. 2013. Interpassivity and the Political Invention of the Brain: Connolly's Neuropolitics versus Libet's Veto-right. Theory & Event. 16 (2). URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/509907

69. Walter R. 2008. Governmentality Accounts of the Economy: A Liberal Bias? Economy and Society. 37 (1): 94-114.

70. Whitehead M. et al. 2017. Neuroliberalism: Behavioural Government in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Routledge.

71. World Bank. 2018. Mind, Behavior, and Development. World Bank. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/ programs/embed

Размещено на Allbest.ru