Экономически зависимые самозанятые: различия национальных подходов к определению правового статуса

63. Consultant.ru. (2018) Proekt Federal'nogo zakona “O vnesenii izmeneniy v Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v chasti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya trudovykh otnosheniy otdel'nykh kategoriy rabotnikovf [The draft Federal Law “On Amendments to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation (in terms of improving the legal regulation of labor relations of certain categories of workers)”.]. [Online]

64. Sudact.ru. (2015) Decision ofthe Proletarsky District Court of Tver No. 2-1325/2015 2-1325/2015-M-1081/2015 M-1081/2015 of June 30, 2015, in case No. 2-1325/2015 in a lawsuit by A.Yu. Scheglova to OJSC Moscow-Tver Suburban Passenger Company. [Online]

65. Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2018) Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29.05.2018 № 15 “O primenenii sudami za- konodatel'stva, reguliruyushchego trud rabotnikov, rabotayushchikh u rabotodateley - fizicheskikh lits i u rabotodateley - sub”ektov malogo predprinimatel'stva, kotorye otneseny k mikropredpriyatiyam” [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 15 of 29 May 2018 “On the application by the courts of laws regulating the labor of workers working with individual employers and with small business employers that are classified as microenterprises”]. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 7.

66. Sudact.ru. (2018) Decision of the Eighth Arbitration Court of Appeal of June 7, 2018, in case No. A70-13715/2017. [Online]

67. ISAP. (1974) Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974 r. Kodeks pracy (Dz.U. z 1974 r. nr 24, poz. 141). [Online]

68. Rathod, J.M. & Skapski, M. (2013) Reimagining the Law of Self-Employment: a Comparative Perspective. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal. 31 (1).

69. Vsetut.pl. (2018) Izmeneniyav Trudovom kodekse Pol'shi v 2018 godu [Changes to the Polish Labor Code in 2018]. [Online]

70. Waas, B. & Heerma van Voss, G. (eds) (2017) Restatement of Labour Law in Europe.Vol. I: The Concept of Employee. Bloomsbury Publishing.

71. Fudge, J. (2003) Labour Protection for Self-Employed Workers. Just Labour. 3. pp. 36-45.

72. Konsul'tantPlyus. (2006) Preamble to Recommendation No. 198 of the International Labor Organization “On the Labor Relations” (Adopted in Geneva on 15 June 2006 at the 95 th session of the ILO General Conference). Moscow: Konsul'tantPlyus. (In Russian).

73. International Labour Office, Governance and Tripartism Department. (2014) Regulating the Employment Relationship in Europe and Central Asia: a Guide to Recommendation No. 198. Geneva: ILO.

74. Rцnnmar, M. (2004) The Personal Scope of Labour Law and the Notion of Employee in Sweden. The 7th JILPT Comparative Labour Law Seminar. Tokyo. 9-10 March 2004. Tokyo. pp. 159-165.

75. Bergqvist, O. & Lunning L. (1997) Toijer GMedbestдmmandelagen: lagtext med kommentarer.Stockholm: Publica.

76. Engblom, S. (2003) Self-Employment and the Personal Scope of Labour Law: Comparative Lessons from France, Italy, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States: EUI PhD theses. Florence.

77. Coletto, F. & Pedersini, R. (2009) Self-Employed Workers: Industrial Relations and Working Conditions. [Online]

78. Hall, J. (2018) This Law Could Give the Self-Employed the Same Rights as Employees. [Online]

79. Pedersini, R. & Coletto, D. (2010) Self-Employed Workers: Industrial Relations and Working Conditions.Dublin: European Foundation for the

80. Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. [Online]

81. Noticias Juridicas. (2007) Ley 20/2007, de 11 de julio, del Estatuto del trabajo autфnomo. [Online]

82. Torres, E.S. (2010) Self-Employed Worker: the Spanish Law on Dependent Self-Employed Workers: a New Evolution in Labor Law. CLLPJ. 31.

83. Noticias Juridicas. (2009) Real Decreto 197/2009, de 23 de febrero, por el que se desarrolla el Estatuto del Trabajo Autфnomo en materia de contrato del trabajador autфnomo econфmicamente dependiente y su registro y se crea el Registro Estatal de asociaciones profesionales de tra- bajadores autфnomos. [Online]

84. Noticia.ru. (2018) Vlasti Ispanii oblegchat zhizn' samozanyatykh grazhdan [The Spanish authorities will facilitate the life of self-employed citizens]. 30 October. [Online]

85. Ein Service des Bundesministeriums der Justiz und fьr Verbraucherschutz sowie des Bundesamts fьr Justiz. (1949) Tarifvertragsgesetz 09.04.1949. Tarifvertragsgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 25 August 1969 (BGBl. Ipp. 1323), das durch Artikel 5 des Gesetzes vom 11 August 2014 (BGBl. I pp. 1348). [Online]

86. Ein Service des Bundesministeriums der Justiz und fьr Verbraucherschutz sowie des Bundesamts fьr Justiz. (1963) Mindesturlaubsgesetz fьr Arbeitnehmer (Bundesurlaubsgesetz) 1963 08 Januar. [Online]

87. Fourie, E.S. (2008) Non-standard workers: the South African context, International law and regulation by the European Union. Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad--Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 11 (4). pp. 110-152.

88. Benjamin, P. (2004) An Accident of History: Who is (and Who Should be) an Employee Under South African Labour Law? Industrial Law Journal. 25. pp. 787-804.

89. Stone, K.V.W. (2006) Legal Protections for Atypical Employees: Employment Law for Workers Without Workplaces and Employees Without Employers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law. 27 (2). pp. 253-286.

90. Westerveld, M. (2012) The `New' Self-Employed: An Issue for Social Policy? European Journal of Social Security. September. 14(3). pp. 156173.

91. EU Court of Justice. (2014) Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 4 December 2014. FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v Staat der Nederland- en. [Online]

92. Business Legal Consultancy. (1927) Artikel 1 (2) Wet van 24 december 1927, houdende nadere regeling van de Collectieve Arbeidsovereenkomst.

93. EU Law. (n.d.) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. [Online]

94. Commission of the European Communities. (2004) Commission Decision of 24 June 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty. [Online]

95. Grosheide, E. & Barenberg, M. (2016) Minimum Fees for the Self-Employed: a European Response to the “Uber-Ized” Economy? Colum. J. Eur. L. 22.

96. Justia. (1968) Fed'n of Musicians v. Carroll, 391 U.S. 99, 104 (1968). [Online] Available from:

97. Nlrb.gov. (n.d.) Code of Laws of the United States of America. Title 29. Chapter 7. Subchapter II. [Online]

The aim of this research is to identify the most effective mechanisms for countering the practice of “unfair competition” in the labor market with the participation of the self-employed. To achieve the aim, the features of the legal status of the economically dependent self-employed in various modern legal orders are examined. In this research, the author analyzed the regulatory legal acts and court practice of the Russian Federation, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, the USA, Sweden, the Republic of South Africa on the regulation of dependent self-employed activities, recognition of civil law labor relations, widespread use of collective contractual regulation and its interaction with competition law. The documents of the International Labor Organization and the European Union, as well as publications of Russian and foreign researchers on the subject of the article were studied. The main methodological approaches in the study were comparative studies, the method of expert assessments, analysis and synthesis, formal legal and functional methods. The author found out that the modern labor market is characterized by an increase in the number of self-employed persons and a decrease in the number of employees. It can therefore be concluded that these processes narrow the scope of labor law, worsen the working conditions and the level of social protection for both self-employed people and employees. Since this problem is acquiring a global character, the article summarizes different national approaches to the regulation of the labor of the self-employed, to the determination of their legal status and the possibility of a flexible application of labor law norms to them. The phenomenon of self-employment for modern Russia was actualized. The article demonstrates a traditional labor law method for solving the problems of concealing an employment relationship for an employer to obtain illegal preferences. Different national practices existing in the Russian Federation and in other countries were compared. The author identified signs of economically dependent self-employed persons in different legal orders that separate them from other self-employed and employees. The problems arising from the provision of collective bargaining rights to the self-employed from the standpoint of antitrust legislation were studied. As a result, the general problems and priorities of legal policy in this area have been identified, and the ways in which the national labor market is protected from “social dumping” existing in different countries have been generalized by bringing the status of economically dependent self-employed persons close to that of employees. The conclusion is made about the imperfection of the priorities of the legal policy of the Russian Federation in the field of the regulation of the self-employed. The policy aims at using monetary methods to withdrawing the self-employed “out of the shadow” to the detriment of social protection with the risk of the deterioration of working and employment conditions.

Keywords: field of labor law in terms of individuals; self-employed; collective agreement; minimum wage.

Размещено на Allbest.ru