Peculiarities of choosing enterprise management strategies in the conditions of circular economy
The peculiarities of choosing enterprise management strategies within the frame-work of circular economy. The potential to provide valuable insights to enterprises seeking to navigate the transition towards sustainable resource modern management.
Рубрика | Экономика и экономическая теория |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 15.04.2024 |
Размер файла | 492,1 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru
Peculiarities of choosing enterprise management strategies in the conditions of circular economy
Особливості вибору стратегій управління підприємствами в умовах циркулярної економіки
Zlotnik Marta
PhD student,
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Злотнік Марта Лазарівна
аспірант,
Національний університет «Львівська політехніка»
This scientific article explores the peculiarities of choosing enterprise management strategies within the frame- work of circular economy. The article identifies and analyzes key research questions related to these challenges, in- cluding the peculiarities and challenges faced by enterprises, the factors influencing strategy selection, the balance between economic viability and environmental/social objectives. The significance of this study lies in its potential to provide valuable insights to enterprises seeking to navigate the transition towards sustainable resource manage- ment. By examining the challenges, factors, and potential outcomes, the study aims to contribute to the knowledge and understanding of circular economy management strategies. The insights gained from this research can guide enterprises towards more sustainable and resource-efficient practices, ultimately contributing to a more environmen- tally and economically resilient future.
Keywords: circular economy, strategic management, strategy alternatives, sustainable development, waste management, product life cycle.
management strategie circular economy
У науковій статті ідентифікуються та аналізуються ключові дослідницькі питання, пов'язані з цими пробле- мою вибору стратегії впровадження та розвитку циркулярної економіки на підприємствах, включаючи фактори, що впливають на вибір стратегій, баланс між економічною доцільністю та екологічними/соціальними цілями, переваги та перешкоди, пов'язані з впровадженням стратегій управління в умовах циркулярної економіки. У дослідженні сформовано матриці вибору стратегій впровадження та розвитку циркулярної економіки, беручи до уваги їх ринкову та технологічну позиції, рівень утворення та поводження з відходами та життєвий цикл продукту. Наведено особливості оцінювання ключових факторів впливу на вибір стратегії впровадження та розвитку циркулярної економіки на підприємствах. Обґрутовано рекомендації щодо впровадження запро- понованих стратегій впровадження та розвитку циркулярної економіки для груп підприємств згідно оцінки ключових факторів впливу зовнішнього та внутрішнього середовища, придатності підприємств та продуктів до впровадження циркулярних бізнес-моделей, адаптивності технологій та бізнес-процесів, ключових тенден- цій ринку. Важливість дослідження полягає у його потенціалі надати рекомендації підприємствам, які праг- нуть пройти перехід до сталого управління ресурсами. Розуміння ключових факторів допоможе організаціям приймати обґрунтовані рішення та відповідати вимогам конкретної галузі. Крім того, дослідження сприяти- ме розвитку наявних знань у галузі циркулярної економіки, розкриваючи взаємозв'язок між економічними, екологічними та соціальними факторами при формулюванні стратегій. Очікується, що отримані результати стануть цінними як для підприємств, так і для законодавців та дослідників, сприяючи обґрунтованому при- йняттю рішень, формулюванню політики та подальшим науковим дослідженням у галузі циркулярної еконо- міки. Отримані висновки з цього дослідження можуть сприяти переорієнтації підприємств на більш сталий та ресурсозберігаючий шлях, що сприятиме більш екологічно стійкому та економічно впевненому майбутньому. Ключові слова: циркулярна економіка, стратегічне управління, стратегічні альтернативи, стійкий розвиток, поводження з відходами, життєвий цикл продукту.
Problem formulation. The concept of circular economy has gained significant attention in recent years as a means to address the environmental challenges posed by traditional linear economic models. Circular economy emphasizes the sustainable use of resources, minimizing waste generation, and maximizing resource efficiency through recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing. As a result, enterprises are increasingly recognizing the need to adopt management strategies that align with the principles of circular economy. However, the process of selecting appropriate strategies poses several peculiarities and challenges, which warrant thorough investigation and understanding.
The development of a model for choosing enterprise management strategies in the context of a circular economy is aimed at helping managers make informed management decisions in the direction of sustainable development.
Analysis of recent research and publications. Circular economy has gained increasing attention in both academic research and industry practice in recent years. Numerous studies have been conducted to explore various aspects of circular economy management strategies and their implementation in different sectors and organizational contexts. These studies often examine the challenges faced by enterprises, the factors influencing strategy selection, and the potential benefits and barriers associated with adopting circular economy principles.
Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P., Hultink E. J provided a comprehensive literature review on circular economy business models. The article explores various types of business models and their implementation within the context of the circular economy. The authors identify research gaps and propose a research agenda for further investigations in this area [1].
Tukker A., Aurisicchio M., and Dijkema G. examined the existing literature on the circular economy and highlights key themes and concepts. The study discusses the drivers, challenges, and potential benefits of transitioning to a circular economy. The authors also propose future research directions to advance the understanding and implementation of circular economy principles [2].
Boons F., Lьdeke-Freund F. identified deci- sion-making processes, factors influencing strategy selection, and the role of stakeholders. The review provides insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with adopting circular economy strategies [3].
Pigosso D.C.A. and Behdad S. examined the drivers and barriers that influence the adoption and implementation of circular business models. The authors identify key elements and strategies to support the development of sustainable and circular business models [4].
Researchers have investigated the pecu- liarities of choosing circular economy mana- gement strategies by considering factors such as the circularity potential of different industries, the availability and flow of resources, technological advancements, policy frameworks, and stakeholder engagement. They have emphasized the need for enterprises to align their strategies with the specific characteristics of their industry, including product lifecycle, value chain structure, and customer behavior, but a systematized model for choosing recommended circular economy strategies at enterprises was not found in the research.
Formulation of research objectives. The main objectives of the following research are to identify and estimate key factors that influence the choice and implementation of circular economy management strategies in different industries and enterprise contexts, to create an approach to balance economic viability, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility when choosing and implementing circular economy management strategies, to build a systematized model for choosing recommended circular economy strategies based on identified factors and to describe potential benefits and barriers associated with adopting circular economy management strategies.
Presentation of the main research material. To build a model for choosing strategies in the circular economy, key factors should be taken into account, including the level of technological development, the market position of the enterprise, the level of waste generation and waste management and the life cycle of the product, networks of circular cooperation, the involvement of stakeholders, the suitability of the product and its components for recycling or reuse.
It is appropriate to separate approaches to the selection of implementation strategies and strategies for the development of the circular economy at enterprises.
Since the development of circular business models at enterprises is primarily related to the use of the latest technologies, the level of technological development of enterprises is one of the key influencing factors when choosing a circular economy development strategy.
The technological position of the enterprise in terms of the circular economy can be assessed by the quantity and quality of renewable materials (the percentage of use of renewable materials in production); the efficiency of resource use (the number of materials and resources used to produce a unit of production), the possibility of using secondary raw materials and resources; the presence of technology for processing products and their components, the level of digitization of business processes, the use of circular product design, as well as the presence of a research and development department engaged in improving the technologies available at the enterprise in the direction of sustainable development [5].
Equally important is taking into account the market position of the enterprise for choosing a strategy for implementing the circular economy. The assessment of the market position of the enterprise, from the point of view of the circular economy, includes consideration of its competitive position, the ability to implement circular practices and compliance with market needs.
In order to assess the circular market position of the enterprise, it is advisable to analyze the market in which the enterprise operates and the share of the enterprise in this market. It is also important to take into account the circular solutions that competitors are already using and what advantages they get from such solutions, their approach to the use of secondary raw materials, renewable energy sources and efficient production technologies. It is appropriate to evaluate one's own circular practices and their competitiveness in the market, as well as the market of secondary raw materials available to the enterprise. It is worth analyzing the standards and certification in the chosen field that correspond to the principles of the circular economy. An important element of the assessment of the market position is the study of consumer behavior, their requirements for products and services, the level of awareness and consciousness in consumption within the circular economy.
In the Table 1 criteria for evaluating the technological and market position of enterprises for the purpose of choosing enterprise
Table 1
Assessment of the technological and market position of enterprises for the purpose of choosing enterprise management strategies in the conditions of the circular economy
Evaluation of the technological position of the enterprise in the conditions of the circular economy |
||||
Position assesment Criteria |
Weak |
Middle |
Strong |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Percentage of use of renewable materials in production |
The company does not use renewable materials in the production of products |
The company partially uses renewable materials in the production of products |
The company uses 100% renewable materials in the production of products |
|
The amount of materials and resources used to produce a unit of product |
High level of consumption of energy, water, plastic, in the production of a unit of the product |
The average level of consumption of energy, water, and plastic in the production of a unit of the product |
Low level of consumption of energy, water, plastic, in the production of a unit of the product |
|
Availability of technology for processing products and their components |
There is no technology for processing products and their components |
The technology of partial processing of products and their components is available |
There is a technology for processing products and their components, which allows closing the production cycle |
|
The possibility of using secondary raw materials and resources |
Impossibility of using secondary raw materials and resources in production |
Limited access to secondary raw materials and resources, only their partial use is possible |
Free access to secondary raw materials and resources, established cooperation with circular suppliers |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Use of circular product design |
Company products are not suitable for reuse or recovery |
Some of the company's products or their components are suitable for reuse or recovery |
The company's products are designed for further reuse or recovery |
|
Availability of a specialized research and development department |
There is no specialized research and development department |
The company has responsible persons involved in the design of circular products and the development of renewable technologies |
The company has a research and development department that designs circular products and develops renewable technologies |
|
Evaluation of the market position of the enterprise in the conditions of the circular economy |
||||
Enterprise market share |
The company's market share is insignificant |
The company's market share is average relative to its competitors |
The company's market share exceeds its competitors |
|
Use of circular solutions by competitors |
The company's competitors actively use circular business models |
The company's competitors partly use circular business models |
The company's competitors do not use circular business models |
|
Competitiveness of own circular practices |
The company's circular practices are not unique in the market and are widely used by competitors |
The company's circular practices are not unique in the market, but they are practically not used by competitors |
The company's circular practices are unique in the market and are not used by competitors |
|
Availability of secondary raw materials |
The supply of secondary raw materials is unavailable to the enterprise |
Limited access to secondary raw materials and resources |
Free access to secondary raw materials and resources, established cooperation with circular suppliers |
|
Availability and compliance with standards and certification |
The enterprise does not have standards and certificates regarding the sustainability and environmental friendliness of products |
The company has some sustainability and environmental standards or certificates for specific products |
The company has sustainability and environmental standards and certificates for all products |
|
Level of conscious consumer consumption |
The use of circular practices is not a significant factor for consumers, there is a lack of awareness about conscious consumption |
Consumers are informed about the principles of conscious consumption, but these are not the main motives that guide them when choosing a product |
Consumers prefer ecological, sustainable products, understand the principles of circular economy and conscious consumption |
management strategies in the conditions of the circular economy are summarized.
Figure 1 provides a matrix for choosing a circular economy implementation strategy, taking into account the position of enterprises regarding waste generation and the product life cycle.
As can be seen from Figure 1, the matrix for choosing a circular economy strategy at enterprises is divided into 4 quadrants, within each of which there are several options for strategies. Let's consider each of the quadrants in more detail.
Figure 1. Matrix for choosing a circular economy implementation strategy at enterprises
Enterprises belonging to quadrant 1 have a strong technological and market position. This means that they can be market leaders in the level of implementation of circular practices. For these enterprises, it is recommended to implement a strategy of complete closure of the production cycle, since they have favorable technological capabilities for this. The implementation of circular innovations and the design of circular products are also effective strategies for enterprises in this quadrant, since the innovative products and technologies developed by them can immediately occupy a separate niche in the market and be competitive.
Firms in quadrant 2 have a strong market position and a weak technological position. For these enterprises, it is recommended to implement reverse flow and resource efficiency improvement strategies, as these strategies do not require significant technological input, but can help enterprises use their resources more efficiently and interact with value chain participants.
Quadrant 3 is characterized by the weak market and technological position of enterprises. For these enterprises, an effective strategy for implementing the circular economy will be circular integration. This strategy will provide an opportunity to establish cooperation with partners within the framework of the use of circular practices in order to increase one's own capacity to use circular models. It is also advisable for enterprises in quadrant 3 to implement strategies for adapting to global challenges and avoiding linear risks in order to increase the level of flexibility to environmental changes and to improve their market position.
Enterprises within quadrant 4 have a weak market and strong technological position. The high level of technology allows digitizing the business processes of enterprises in this quadrant, so the implementation of virtualization technology is recommended for them. In addition, these enterprises can choose the strategy of creating new value chains due to the development of innovative technologies and, thus, strengthen their market position.
If the company already uses circular business models and needs to choose a strategy for the further development of the circular economy, the key criteria for making strategic decisions will differ. Since the main priority for the enterprise when forming a circular economy development strategy is the improvement of already existing sustainable business models, it is advisable to choose the product life cycle and the level of waste generation as the most important influencing factors.
In order to assess the level of waste management at the enterprise, it is necessary to take into account the amount of generation of various types of waste, depending on the specifics of its activity.
In order to analyze the company's position regarding waste generation, it is worth calculating the volume of waste generation per unit of production and the share of waste in the total volume of production. The acceptable value may vary depending on various factors such as industry, product type, regulatory standards and organizational goals.
In addition to the volume of waste generation, it is also worth analyzing the methods of handling it [6]:
Waste prevention: development and implementation of processes and technologies aimed at reducing waste at the stage of product design or production process.
Processing and secondary use: deve- lopment of a waste processing system at the enterprise with the aim of using them as secondary raw materials in the processes of recycling, processing and use of waste in other production processes.
Composting and Biodegradation: Com- posting techniques are used for organic waste, such as food or plant residues, to turn it into high-quality compost that can be used as fertilizer.
Energy use: some waste can be used for energy production (for example, by anaerobic digestion).
Disposal and safe storage: If the waste cannot be recycled, it must be disposed of or stored in a safe way to avoid negative impact on the environment.
Landfilling, which is considered the least desirable method of waste management from the point of view of the circular economy and sustainable resources. This method of waste management has disadvantages, such as potential negative impact on the environment, loss of resources, and irrational use of space.
Life cycle assessment of a product in the context of the circular economy in the context of the circular economy is also an important tool for analyzing the environmental and economic aspects of the product throughout its life. This allows you to take into account the impact of the product on the environment, energy resources, the use of raw materials and the possibility of its secondary use or recycling.
The main steps of product life cycle assessment in circular economy conditions include [7]:
Determining the limits of the useful life of the product: establishing time frames and stages of the product's life cycle. This may include the extraction of raw materials, production, packaging, delivery, use, disposal and reuse or recycling.
Identification of inputs and outputs: identification of all inputs (and outputs) associated with each stage of the product life cycle. This includes costs of raw materials, water, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, waste and other factors related to production , transportation, use and disposal of the product.
Environmental Impact Assessment: Identify and assess the potential environmental impact of a product at each stage of its life cycle (development, marketing, growth, maturity and decline).
In the Table 2 criteria for evaluating the position of enterprises regarding waste generation and the product life cycle are summarized for the purpose of choosing enterprise management strategies in the conditions of a circular economy. Figure 2 provides a matrix for choosing a circular economy development strategy, taking into account the technological and market position of enterprises.
Companies in Quadrant 1 have a strong position on waste generation and management, as well as on the product life cycle, so it makes sense for them to apply technology leadership strategies and focus on circular business models, which will allow them to strengthen their competitiveness in the industry and be key players in the market of enterprises using circular business models.
Quadrant 2 includes enterprises with a weak position on waste generation and management, but a strong position on product life cycle. In order to optimize waste management, it is recommended for these enterprises to implement strategies to increase energy efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint. The strategy of circular decentralization is also
Table 2
Assessment of the position of enterprises regarding the generation of waste
and the product life cycle in order to choose enterprise management strategies in the conditions of the circular economy
Assessment of the technological position of enterprises regarding waste generation in the conditions of the circular economy |
||||
Position assesment Criteria |
Weak |
Middle |
Strong |
|
Volume of waste generation |
The volume of waste generation per unit of production and the share of waste in the total volume of production exceeds 20% |
The volume of waste generation per unit of production and the share of waste in the total volume of production does not exceed 20% |
The volume of waste generation per unit of production and the share of waste in the total volume of production does not exceed 5% |
|
Level of hazardous waste generation |
Hazardous waste is generated at the enterprise to a large extent and is not disposed of properly |
Hazardous waste is generated at the enterprise in a small amount and disposed of in a safe way |
The enterprise does not generate hazardous waste |
|
Waste management methods |
Disposal and safe storage, disposal in landfills |
Processing and secondary use, Energy use |
Waste prevention, composting and biodegradation |
|
Evaluation of the life cycle of the product in the conditions of the circular economy |
||||
Product useful life limits |
Short useful life of the product (does not exceed 6 months) |
The average useful life of the product (does not exceed 1 year) |
Long useful life of the product (exceeds 1 year) |
|
Resource intensity of the product |
Product production requires significant consumption of raw materials, materials, water, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, etc |
Production of the product requires moderate consumption of resources, some of the business processes are digitized |
The production of the product does not require significant consumption of resources, a significant number of business processes are digitized |
|
The impact of the product on the environment at each stage of the life cycle |
The production and consumption of a product causes a negative impact on the environment at all stages of its life cycle |
The production of the product causes a certain negative impact on the environment only at the stages of product development and its introduction to the market |
The production and consumption of the product does not cause a negative impact on the environment at any stage of its life cycle |
appropriate for these enterprises, as it involves a more efficient allocation of resources, which also helps to avoid the generation of excess waste.
Enterprises located in quadrant 3 have a weak position both in terms of waste generation and management, as well as in terms of product life cycle. Such a position is unfavorable for the development of the circular economy at enterprises, therefore, strategies are recommended for them, which involve more
drastic changes in the strategic management of enterprises, namely, strategies for reengineering business processes and recycling resources. By implementing these strategies, the enterprise can change its approach to waste management and optimize the use of resources at each stage of the product's life cycle.
Quadrant 4 contains companies with a weak position on product life cycle, but a strong position on waste generation and management. For these enterprises, the recommended strategies are
Figure 2. Matrix for choosing a circular economy development strategy at enterprises
lean production and slowing down the product life cycle, which will increase the suitability of products for circular economy business models. It is also advisable for these enterprises to implement a strategy of circular differentiation, which will increase the competitiveness of products with a short life cycle.
Conclusion
Therefore, the choice of enterprise management strategies in the conditions of the circular economy is a management process that involves the adoption of a management decision based on the analysis of the technological, market, environmental, product, sectoral suitability of enterprises for the implementation of circular practices.
Achieving a balanced approach that considers economic, environmental, and social dimensions is essential for successful circular economy strategy formulation. Enterprises must recognize the potential economic benefits, such as resource efficiency, cost savings, and new business opportunities, while also addressing environmental concerns, such as reduced resource extraction and waste generation. Additionally, they should consider the social implications, including job creation, skills development, and social equity, to ensure holistic and sustainable outcomes.
By recognizing the challenges, identifying key factors, and highlighting the importance of a balanced approach, this research provides valuable insights for enterprises, policymakers, and researchers. It is expected that these findings will contribute to informed decision-making, policy formulation, and further advancements in circular economy management strategies, ultimately driving the transition towards a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. In conclusion, this study contributes to the understanding of the peculiarities involved in choosing enterprise management strategies in the conditions of circular economy.
References
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). Circular Economy Business Models: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1148-1160.
Tukker, A., Aurisicchio, M., Dijkema, G., et al. (2018). Circular Economy: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 245-257.
Boons, F., & Lьdeke-Freund, F. (2019). Strategic Decision-Making for the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 679-692.
Pigosso, D.C.A., Behdad, S., et al. (2019). A Framework for Circular Business Model Innovation: Exploring Drivers and Barriers for Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198-216.
Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Circular Economy Strategies in Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 42-55.
Farooq, M., Cheng, J., Khan, N.U., Saufi, R.A., Kanwal, N., & Bazkiaei, H.A. (2022). Sustainable Waste Management Companies with Innovative Smart Solutions: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model. Sustaina- bility, 14(20), 13146. MDPI AG. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su142013146.
Rizos, V., Behrens, A., et al. (2016). Managing the Transition to Circular Economy: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Sustainability, 8(8), 1-20.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
The levers of management of a national economy, regions and enterprises. The prices for the goods. Taxes to the proceeds from realization of commodity production. Proceeds from realization of services to the population, establishments and organizations.
реферат [18,7 K], добавлен 12.04.2012Concept and program of transitive economy, foreign experience of transition. Strategic reference points of long-term economic development. Direction of the transition to an innovative community-oriented type of development. Features of transitive economy.
курсовая работа [29,4 K], добавлен 09.06.2012Resources of income for enterprises. Main ways of decreasing the costs Main ways of increasing the income. Any enterprise’s target is to make profit. In order to make it a company should understand where comes from the income and where goes out costs.
курсовая работа [59,9 K], добавлен 09.11.2010The essence of economic efficiency and its features determination in grain farming. Methodology basis of analysis and efficiency of grain. Production resources management and use. Dynamics of grain production. The financial condition of the enterprise.
курсовая работа [70,0 K], добавлен 02.07.2011Defining the role of developed countries in the world economy and their impact in the political, economic, technical, scientific and cultural spheres.The level and quality of life. Industrialised countries: the distinctive features and way of development.
курсовая работа [455,2 K], добавлен 27.05.2015The Hamburger Industry: franchising, market conduct, marketing strategies of competing parties. Challenges confronting in the fast-food industry. Conflicts between franchisers and franchisees. Consumer behavior. The main role of management, its changes.
курсовая работа [29,7 K], добавлен 06.11.2013Формирование корпоративных структур. Порядок государственного регулирования деятельности. Мировая практика деятельности холдингов. Финансовые показатели, управление, органы управления, факторы роста, управление рисками в АО "System Capital Management".
реферат [179,4 K], добавлен 24.01.2014Directions of activity of enterprise. The organizational structure of the management. Valuation of fixed and current assets. Analysis of the structure of costs and business income. Proposals to improve the financial and economic situation of the company.
курсовая работа [1,3 M], добавлен 29.10.2014The definition of term "economic security of enterprise" and characteristic of it functional components: technical and technological, intellectual and human resources component, information, financial, environmental, political and legal component.
презентация [511,3 K], добавлен 09.03.2014Assessment of the rate of unemployment in capitalist (the USA, Germany, England, France, Japan) and backward countries (Russia, Turkey, Pakistan, Afghanistan). Influence of corruption, merges of business and bureaucracy on progress of market economy.
реферат [15,5 K], добавлен 12.04.2012Short and long run macroeconomic model. Saving and Investment in Italy, small open economy. Government expenditure and saving scatterplot. Loanable market equilibrium in closed economy in the USA. Okun’s Law in the USA and Italy, keynesian cross.
курсовая работа [1,6 M], добавлен 20.11.2013The major structural elements of economic safety of a national economy branches. The structural analysis of economic activity. Share of wages in ВВП, of productivity of Russia and western countries. The essence of the economic taxes and their purpose.
статья [166,3 K], добавлен 12.04.2012A variety of economy of Kazakhstan, introduction of the international technical, financial, business standards, the introduction to the WTO. The measures planned in the new Tax code. Corporation surtax. Surtax reform. Economic growth and development.
реферат [27,2 K], добавлен 26.02.2012Socio-economic and geographical description of the United states of America. Analysis of volumes of export and import of the USA. Development and state of agroindustrial complex, industry and sphere of services as basic sectors of economy of the USA.
курсовая работа [264,5 K], добавлен 06.06.2014Chinese economy: history and problems. Problems of Economic Growth. The history of Chinese agriculture. The ratio of exports and imports of goods and service to gross domestic product at current prices. Inefficiencies in the agricultural market.
курсовая работа [162,1 K], добавлен 17.05.2014The essence of Natural Monopoly. The necessity of regulation over Natural Monopoly. Methods of state regulation over the Natural Monopolies. Analysis and Uzbek practice of regulation over Monopolies. Natural Monopolies in modern Economy of Uzbekistan.
курсовая работа [307,7 K], добавлен 13.03.2014Prospects for reformation of economic and legal mechanisms of subsoil use in Ukraine. Application of cyclically oriented forecasting: modern approaches to business management. Preconditions and perspectives of Ukrainian energy market development.
статья [770,0 K], добавлен 26.05.2015Рrogress in adapting its economy from the Soviet model to a 21st century economy in the globalized market. Pension reforms, undertaken in 2011. Cancellation of grain export quotas and reversal of a proposal for the monopolisation of grain exports.
презентация [476,2 K], добавлен 08.04.2015Concept of competitiveness and competition, models. Russia’s endowment. Engendered structural dominance and performance. The state of Russian competitiveness according to the Global Competitiveness Index. Place in the world, main growth in detail.
курсовая работа [1,2 M], добавлен 28.05.2014State intervention in the economy. Assessment and the role of teaching Veblen. Economic development of the society. Process of long-term loan and the inclusion of investor-banker in industrial production. Negative aspects of American institucionalism.
реферат [27,4 K], добавлен 14.11.2012