Археология, историческое наследие и проблемы этики
Понятие исторического наследия. Рассмотрение вопроса о взаимоотношениях археологов с "общественностью" в общей форме. Археологическая реконструкция причин крушения цивилизации майя, взаимоотношения между учеными и малочисленным коренным населением.
| Рубрика | История и исторические личности |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | русский |
| Дата добавления | 09.02.2021 |
| Размер файла | 57,4 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
50. Green L. Archaeologies of Intellectual Heritage? // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 229-243.
51. Greenberg R. Ethics in Action: A Viewpoint from Israel/Palestine // Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence / A. Gonzalez-Ruibal, G. Moshenska (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 19-32.
52. Groarke L., Warrick G. Stewardship gone astray? Ethics and the SAA // The ethics of archaeology. archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice / Ch. Scarre, G. Scarre (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. P. 163-179.
53. Haber A. Archaeology after archaeology // After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post- Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology / A. Haber, N. Shepherd (eds.). New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015a. P. 127-137.
54. Haber A. Archaeology and Capitalist Development: Lines of Complicity // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015b. P. 95-113.
55. Haber A., Shepherd N. After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology: An Introduction // After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology / A. Haber, N. Shepherd (eds.). New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015. P. 1-10.
56. Hamilakis Y. Iraq, stewardship and `the record':an ethical crisis for archaeology // Public archaeology. 2003. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 104-111.
57. Hamilakis Y. From ethics to politics // Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics / Y. Hamilakis, P. Duke (eds.). Walnut Creek, cA: Left Coast Press, 2007. P. 15-40.
58. Hamilakis Y. The `war on terror' and the military-archaeology complex: Iraq, ethics, and neocolonialism // Archaeology: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress. 2009. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 39-65.
59. Hamilakis Y. Some Debts Can Never Be Repaid: The Archaeo-politics of the Crisis // Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 2016. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 228-233.
60. Hamilakis Y. An oneiric archaeology of the crisis: the Amphipolis saga // Archaeology of the Future/Archaologie der Zukunft (CulturescapesGriechenland) / K. Botanova, C.Ch. Crys- sopoulos (eds.). Basel: Christoph Merian, 2017. P. 16-36.
61. Handler R. Is «identity» a useful cross-cultural concept? // Commemorations. The politics of national identity / John R. Gillis (ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994. P. 27-40.
62. Hewison R. The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen Publishing Ltd., 1987.
63. Hodder I. The Past as Passion and Play: Qatalhoyuk as a Site of Conflict in the Construction of Multiple Pasts // Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East / L. Meskell (ed.). London: Routledge, 1998. P. 124-139.
64. Hodder I. Is a Shared Past Possible? The Ethics and Practice of Archaeology in the Twenty- First Century // New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology / K. Okamura, A. Matsu- da (eds.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011. P. 19-28.
65. Holtorf C. Can less be more? Heritage in the age of terrorism // Public archaeology. 2006. Vol. 5. P. 101-109.
66. Holtorf C. A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies // World Archaeology. 2009. Vol. 41, № 4. P. 672-681.
67. Jofre Luna I.C.J. The Mark of the Indian Still Inhabits Our Body: On Ethics and Disciplining in South American Archaeology // After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology / A. Haber, N. Shepherd (eds.). New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015. P. 55-78.
68. Krupat A.Ethnocriticism: Ethnography, History, and Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
69. Lackey D.P. Ethics and Native American reburials: a philosopher's view of two decades of NAGPRA // The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice / Ch. Scarre, G. Scarre (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. P. 146162.
70. Loosley E. Archaeology and cultural belonging in contemporary Syria: The value of archaeology to religious minorities // World Archaeology. 2005. Vol. 37, № 4. P. 589-596.
71. Lowenthal D. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
72. Matsuda A., Okamura K. Introduction: New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology // New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology / K. Okamura, A. Matsuda (eds.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011. P. 1-18.
73. McDavid C., Brock T.P. The Differing Forms of Public Archaeology: Where We Have Been, Where We Are Now, and Thoughts for the Future // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 159-184.
74. Meskell L. Archaeological ethnography: Conversations around Kruger National Park // Archaeologies. 2005. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 81-100.
75. MeskellL. (ed.). Cosmopolitan Archaeologies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.
76. Meskell L., Pels P. (eds.). Embedding ethics: Shifting the boundaries of the anthropological profession. Berg: Oxford, 2005.
77. Morris A. Public Archaeology and Critical Histories: Collaborative Archaeology in Southern Illinois // Journal of African diaspora archaeology and heritage. 2014. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 159-174.
78. Murray T. Archaeologists and Indigenous people: A maturing relationship? // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 363-378.
79. Nicholas G., Hollowel J. Ethical Challenges to a Postcolonial Archaeology: the Legacy of Scientific Colonialism // Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics / Y. Ha- milakis, P. Duke (ed.). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2007. P. 59-82.
80. Niklasson E., Holleland H. The Scandinavian far-right and the new politicisation of heritage // Journal of Social Archaeology. 2018. № 2. P. 121-148.
81. Owsley D.W., Jantz R.L. (eds.). Kennewick Man: The Scientific Investigation of an Ancient American Skeleton. College Station: TexasA&MUniversityPress, 2014.
82. Pels P. Professions of Duplexity: A Prehistory of Ethical Codes in Anthropology // Current Anthropology. 1999. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 101-114.
83. Phillips C., Ross A. Both Sides of the Ditch: The Ethics of Narrating the Past in the Present // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 27-40.
84. Pyburn K.A. Engaged Archaeology: Whose Community? Which Public? // New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology / K. Okamura, A. Matsuda (eds.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011. P. 29-41.
85. Reid J.J. Recent findings on North American prehistory // American Antiquity. 1992. Vol. 57, № 2. P. 195-196.
86. Robertshaw P. Knowledge and power // African Archaeological Review. 1996. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 7-9.
87. Rowlands M. The politics of identity in archaeology // Social construction of the past: representation as power / G.C. Bond, A. Gilliam (eds.). London: Routledge, 1994. P. 129-143.
88. Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: CambridgeUniv. Press, 2006a.
89. Scarre Ch., Scarre G. Introduction // Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006b. P. 1-12.
90. Scham S.A., Yahya A. Heritage and reconciliation // Journal of Social Archaeology. 2003. Vol. 3, № 3. P. 399-416.
91. Schoenbrun D. Violence and vulnerability in East Africa before 1800 CE: An agenda for research // History Compass. 2006. Vol. 4, № 5. P. 741-760.
92. Shepherd N.Undisciplining Archaeological Ethics // After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post- Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology / A. Haber, N. Shepherd (eds.). New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015. P. 10-25.
93. Shnirelman V.A. Alternative prehistory // Journal of European Archaeology. 1995. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 1-20.
94. Shnirelman V.A. Who gets the past? Competition for ancestors among non-Russian intellectuals in Russia. Washington, DC; Baltimore; London: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
95. Shnirelman V.A. The politics of the past in Dagestan: national unity and symbolic revolt // Europe-Asia Studies. 2018. Vol. 70, № 6. P. 966-990.
96. Smith L. Archaeological theory and the politics of culture heritage. New York: Routledge, 2004.
97. Smith L. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge, 2006.
98. Spriggs M. Pacific archaeologies: contested ground in the construction of Pacific history // The Journal of Pacific History. 1999. Vol. 34, № 1. P. 109-121.
99. Stout A. Creating prehistory: druids, Ley hunters and archaeologists in pre-war Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
100. Swain H. The ethics of displaying human remains from British archaeological sites // Public archaeology. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 95-100.
101. Thomas D. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity, New York: Basic Books, 2000.
102. Watkins J. Yours, mine, or ours? Conflicts between archaeologists and ethnic groups // The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans, and Repatriation / T.L. Bray (ed.). New York: Garland Publishing, 2001. P. 57-68.
103. Watkins J. Through wary eyes: Indigenous perspectives on archaeology // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2005. Vol. 34. P. 429-449.
104. Watkins J. An Indigenous Anthropologist's Perspective on Archaeological Ethics // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 21-26.
105. Wright P.On Living in an Old Country.The National Past in Contemporary Britain. London: Verso, 1985.
106. Wynn L.L. Shape Shifting Lizard People, Israelite Slaves, and Other Theories of Pyramid Building. Notes on Labor, Nationalism, and Archaeology in Egypt // Journal of Social Archaeology. 2008. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 272-295.
107. Yellowhorn E. Just Methods, No Madness: Historical Archaeology on the Piikani First Nation // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). New York: Springer, 2015. P. 245-256.
108. Young J.O. Cultures and the ownership of archaeological finds // The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice / Ch. Scarre, G. Scarre (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. P. 15-31.
109. Zimmerman L.J. Usurping Native American voice // The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans, and Repatriation / T. Bray (ed.). New York: Garland Publishing, 2001. P. 169-184.
110. Zorzin N. Archaeology and Capitalism: Successful Relationship or Economic and Ethical Alienation? // Ethics and archaeological praxis / C. Gnecco, D. Lippert (eds.). NewYork: Springer, 2015. P. 115-139.
References
1. DoroninD.Iu. Chtoopiat' ne tak s «altaiskoiprintsessoi»?Novyefaktyizn'iuslornoibiografiiAk Kadyn [What is wrong again with the `Altai princess'? New facts from newslore biography of Ak Kadyn], Sibirskieistoricheskieissledovaniia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 74-104.
2. Klein L.S. Kodeksetikiarkheologaiakspravachestikraini [Code of ethics for archaeologists as a matter of the country's honour], Arkheologtia, 2009, no. 1, pp. 100-102.
3. Koreniako V.A. Eticheskieproblemyikrizisnyeiavleniia v arkheologii [Ethical issues and phenomena of crisis in archaeology]. In: ProblemypervobytnoiarkheologiiEvrazii (k 75- letiiu A.A.F Ormozova). Sb. statei [Issues in the pre-historic archaeology of Eurasia (associated with the 75th anniversary of A.A.F Ormozova). A collection of articles].Eds. and comp. by V.I. Guliaev, S.V. Kuz'minykh. Moscow: IA RAN, 2004, pp. 36-47.
4. Koreniako V.A. Ob eticheskomkodekseprofessional'nykharkheologov (zarubezhnyiopyt) [Legislation of other nations on archaeological heritage protection], Rossiiskaia ark- heologiia, 2013, no. 4, pp. 125-142.
5. Koreniako V.A. Problemyetikiieticheskogokodeksaprofessional'nykharkheologov [Issues of ethics and code of ethics for professional archaeologists]. In: Trudy IV (XX) Vserossiis- kogoarkheologicheskogos"ezda v Kazani. Vol. 4 [Proceedings of the 20th Russian Archaeological Congress in Kazan.Vol. 4]. Kazan': Otechestvo, 2014, pp. 240-242.
6. Koreniako V.A. Professional'nyearkheologiobeticheskikhproblemakhsvoeinauki [Professional archaeologists on ethical issues in their research]. In: Etika v arkheologii [Ethics in archaeology]. Ed. by G.T. Obydennova. Ufa: izd-vobGpU, 2016, pp. 59-79.
7. Koreniako V.A. Eticheskieproblemyiproiavleniiakrizisa v sovremennoiarkheologii (shest' let spustia) [Ethical issues and crisis manifestations in contemporary archaeology (6 years later)]. In: Etika v arkheologii [Ethics in archaeology]. Ed. by G.T. Obydennova. Ufa: izd- vo BGPU, 2016, pp. 179-200.
8. Koreniako V.A. Eticheskiikodeksrossiiskogoarkheologa.Proekt [The code of ethics for Russian archaeologists.Draft]. In: «I muzoiu emu bylanauka»: Sbornikpamiati V.A. Koreniako (1952-2016) [`And science was his muse': A collection of papers dedicated to the memory of V.A. Koreniako (1952-2016)]. Eds. and comp. by S.V. Kuz'minykh, A.A. Gorbenko. Azov: Azov. ist.-arkheolog. ipaleontolog. muzei-zapovednik, 2017, pp. 89-91.
9. Obydennova G.T. (ed.). Etika v arkheologii [Ethics in archaeology]. Ufa: izd-vo BGPU, 2016.
10. Pletts G., Soenov V.I., Konstantinov N.A., Robinson E. Mezhdunarodnoeznachenierepatriatsii «Ukokskoiprintsessy» (gotova li rossiiskaiaarkheologiia k dialogu s korennyminarodami?) [International implications of the `Ukok Princess's repatriation (Is Russian archaeology ready for dialogue with the indigenous peoples?)]. In: DrevnostiSibiriiTsentral'noiAzii [Antiquities of Siberia in Central Asia]. Gorno-Altaisk, 2014, no. 7, pp. 17-45.
11. Formozov A.A. O kritikeistochnikov v arkheologii [On the critique of sources in archaeology], Sovetskaiaarkheologiia, 1977, no. 1, pp. 5-14.
12. Formozov A.A. Russkiearkheologi v period totalitarizma.Istoriograficheskieocherki [Russian archaeologists during the period of totalitarianism.Historiographic essays]. Moscow: Znak, 2004.
13. Formozov A.A. Chelovekinauka.Izzapiseiarkheologa [Man and science.From the notes of an archaeologist]. Moscow: Znak, 2005.
14. Formozov A.A. Stat'iraznykh let [Articles written in different years]. Kursk: GOU VPO KGMU Roszdrava, 2008.
15. Shnirel'man V.A. Vozniknovenieproizvodiashchegokhoziaistva [The emergence of a producing economy]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989.
16. Shnirel'man V.A. StrastipoArkaimu: ariiskaiaideiainatsionalizm [Arkaim's passion: the
17. Aryan idea and nationalism]. In: Olkott M.B., Semenov I. (eds.). Iazykietnicheskiikonflikt[Language and ethnic conflict]. Moscow: Gendal'f, 2001, pp. 58-85.
18. Shnirel'man V.A. Identichnost' iobrazypredkov: tataryperedvyborom [Identity and the images of ancestors: the Tatars facing a choice], VestnikEvrazii, 2002, no. 4, pp. 128-147.
19. Shnirel'man V.A. Voinypamiati: mify, identichnost' ipolitika v Zakavkaz'e [Warriors of memory: myths, identity, and politics in the Caucasian region]. Moscow: IKTs Akade- mkniga, 2003.
20. Shnirel'man V.A. Byt' alanami.IntellektualyipolitikanaSevernomKavkaze v XX veke [To be alanami. Intellectuals and politics in the North Caucasus in the 20th century.]. Moscow: NLO, 2006.
21. Shnirel'man V.A. Ariitsyilitiurki? Bor'bazapredkov v Tsentral'noiAzii [Aryans or Turks?A battle for ancestry in Central Asia], Politicheskaiakontseptologiia, 2009, no. 4, pp. 192-212. Available at: http://politconcept.sfedu.ru/2009.4714.pdf (Accessed 1 November 2019).
22. Shnirel'man V.A. Religiia, natsionalizmimezhkonfessional'nyikonflikt v Indii [Religion, nationalism, and inter-confessional conflict in India]. In: Tishkov V.A., Shnirel'man V.A. (eds.). Etnichnost' ireligiia v sovremennykhkonfliktakh [Ethnicity and religion on contemporary conflicts]. Moscow: Nauka, 2012a, pp. 57-109.
23. Shnirel'man V.A. Khazarskiimif: ideologiiapoliticheskogoradikalizma v Rossiiieeistoki[The Khazar myth: ideology of political radicalism in Russia and its origins]. Moscow: Mostykul'tury-Gesharim, 2012b.
24. Shnirel'man V.A. Natsionalizmiarkheologiia [Nationalism and archaeology], Etnografich- eskoeobozrenie, 2013, no. 1, pp. 9-25.
25. Shnirel'man V.A. ArkaimiStounkhendzhmezhduproshlymibudushchim [Arkaim and Stonehenge between the past and the future], Etnograficheskoeobozrenie, 2014, no. 5, pp. 19-40.
26. Shnirel'man V.A. Konstruirovanieistoricheskogonaslediia - sluchaiArkaima [Constructing historical heritage: the case of Arkaim], Sibirskieistoricheskieissledovaniia, 2015a, no. 2, pp. 53-65.
27. Shnirel'man V.A. Ariiskiimif v sovremennom mire [The Aryan myth in today's world]. Vol. 1-2. Moscow: NLO, 2015b.
28. Shnirel'man V.A. Migranty, ksenofobiiaisotsial'naiapamiat' - primer Avstrii [Migrants, xenophobia, and social memory: the case of Austria], Novoeproshloe, 2018, no. 2, pp. 64-84.
29. Allen M. Ethics in the Publishing of Archaeology. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 185-200.
30. Almansa Sanchez J. Trading Archaeology Is Not Just a Matter of Antiquities: Archaeological Practice as a Commodity. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 148-153.
31. Badiou A. Ethics. Essay on the Understanding of Evil. London: Verso, 2001.
32. Bender B. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg, 1998.
33. Bendremer J.C., Richman K.A. Human subjects review and archaeology: a view from Indian country. In: ScarreCh., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 97-114.
34. Benedict J. No Bone Unturned: The Adventures of a Top Smithsonian Forensic Scientist and the Legal Battle for America's Oldest Skeletons. New York: Harper Collins, 2003.
35. Chirikure Sh. “Do as I Say and Not as I Do”. On the Gap Between Good Ethics and Reality in African Archaeology. In: Haber A., Shepherd N. (eds.). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology. New York, NY : Springer New York, 2015, pp. 27-38.
36. Colwell-Chanthaphonh Chip., Ferguson T. J. Trust and archaeological practice: towards a framework of Virtue Ethics. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 115-130.
37. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C., Ferguson T. J. (eds). Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities. Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 2008.
38. Colwell Ch., Joy Ch. Communities and Ethics in the Heritage Debates. In: Lynn Meskell (ed.). Global Heritage: A Reader. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015, pp. 112-130.
39. Cooper D. E. Truthfulness and `inclusion' in archaeology. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 131-145.
40. Curtoni R. P.Against Global Archaeological Ethics: Critical Views from South America. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 41-47.
41. Dezhamkhooy M., Yazdi L. P., Garazhian O. All Our Findings Are Under Their Boots! The Monologue of Violence in Iranian Archaeology. In: Gonzalez-Ruibal A., Moshenska G. (eds.). Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 51-70.
42. Di Giovine M.A. Patrimonial Ethics and the Field of Heritage Production. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 201227.
43. Everill P. The invisible diggers.A study of British commercial archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2009.
44. Ferguson T.J. Native Americans and the practice of archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1996, Vol. 25, pp. 63-79.
45. Ferris N., Welch J.R. New Worlds: Ethics in Contemporary North American Archaeological Practice. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 69-92.
46. Fowler P.The Past in Contemporary Society: Then, Now. London: Routledge, 1992.
47. Giblin J. Archaeological Ethics and Violence in Post-genocide Rwanda. In: Gonzalez-Ruibal A., Moshenska G. (eds.). Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 33-50.
48. Gnecco C. An entanglements of sorts: archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism. In: Gnec- co C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 1-17.
49. Gnecco C., Hernandez C. History and its discontents: Stone statues, native histories and archaeologists, Current Anthropology, 2008, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 439-455.
50. Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015.
51. Green L. Archaeologies of Intellectual Heritage? In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 229-243.
52. Greenberg R. Ethics in Action: A Viewpoint from Israel/Palestine. In: Gonzalez-Ruibal A., Moshenska G. (eds.). Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 19-32.
53. Groarke L., Warrick G. Stewardship gone astray? Ethics and the SAA. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology.archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 163-179.
54. Haber A. Archaeology after archaeology. In: Haber A., Shepherd N. (eds.). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015a, pp. 127-137.
55. Haber A. Archaeology and Capitalist Development: Lines of Complicity. In: Gnecco C., Lip- pert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015b, pp. 95-113.
56. Haber A., Shepherd N. After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology: An Introduction. In: Haber A., Shepherd N. (eds.). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015, pp. 1-10.
57. Hamilakis Y. Iraq, stewardship and `the record': an ethical crisis for archaeology, Public archaeology, 2003, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 104-111.
58. Hamilakis Y. From ethics to politics. In: Y. Hamilakis, P. Duke (eds.). Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2007, pp. 15-40.
59. Hamilakis Y. The `war on terror' and the military-archaeology complex: Iraq, ethics, and neocolonialism, Archaeology: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 2009, Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39-65.
60. Hamilakis Y. Some Debts Can Never Be Repaid: The Archaeo-politics of the Crisis, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 2016, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 228-233.
61. Hamilakis Y. An oneiric archaeology of the crisis: the Amphipolis saga. In: K. Botanova and C. Ch. Cryssopoulos (eds.). Archaeology of the Future/Archдologie der Zukunft (Cul- turescapesGriechenland).Basel: Christoph Merian, 2017, pp. 16-36.
62. Handler R. Is “identity” a useful cross-cultural concept? In: John R. Gillis (ed.). Commemorations.The politics of national identity. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 27-40.
63. Hewison R. The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline. London: Methuen Publishing Ltd., 1987.
64. Hodder I. The Past as Passion and Play: Qatalhцyьkas a Site of Conflict in the Construction of Multiple Pasts. In: L. Meskell (ed.). Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 124-139.
65. Hodder I. Is a Shared Past Possible? The Ethics and Practice of Archaeology in the Twenty- First Century. In: K. Okamura and A. Matsuda (eds.). New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011, pp. 19-28.
66. HoltorfC. Can less be more? Heritage in the age of terrorism, Public archaeology, 2006, vol. 5, pp. 101-109.
67. Holtorf C. European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies, World Archaeology, 2009, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 672-681.
68. Jofre Luna I.C.J. The Mark of the Indian Still Inhabits Our Body: On Ethics and Disciplining in South American Archaeology. In: Haber A., Shepherd N. (eds.). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015, pp. 55-78.
69. Krupat A. Ethnocriticism: Ethnography, History, and Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
70. Lackey D.P. Ethics and Native American reburials: a philosopher's view of two decades of NAGPRA. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 146162.
71. Loosley E. Archaeology and cultural belonging in contemporary Syria: The value of archaeology to religious minorities, World Archaeology, 2005, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 589-596.
72. Lowenthal D. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
73. Matsuda A., Okamura K. Introduction: New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology. In: K. Okamura and A. Matsuda (eds.). New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology.New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011, pp. 1-18.
74. McDavid C., Brock T.P. The Differing Forms of Public Archaeology: Where We Have Been, Where We Are Now, and Thoughts for the Future. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 159-184.
75. Meskell L. Archaeological ethnography: Conversations around Kruger National Park, Archaeologies, 2005, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81-100.
76. Meskell L. (ed.). Cosmopolitan Archaeologies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.
77. Meskell L., Pels P. (eds.). Embedding ethics: Shifting the boundaries of the anthropological profession. Berg: Oxford, 2005.
78. Morris A. Public Archaeology and Critical Histories: Collaborative Archaeology in Southern Illinois, Journal of African diaspora archaeology and heritage, 2014, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159-174.
79. Murray T. Archaeologists and Indigenous people: A maturing relationship?,Annual Review of Anthropology, 2011, vol. 40, pp. 363-378.
80. Nicholas G., Hollowel J. Ethical Challenges to a Postcolonial Archaeology: the Legacy of Scientific Colonialism. In: Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics.Edited by Y. Hamilakis and P. Duke. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2007, pp. 59-82.
81. Niklasson E., Holleland H. The Scandinavian far-right and the new politicisation of heritage, Journal of Social Archaeology, 2018, no. 2, pp. 121-148.
82. Owsley D.W., Jantz R.L. (eds.). Kennewick Man: The Scientific Investigation of an Ancient American Skeleton. College Station: TexasA&MUniversityPress, 2014.
83. Pels P. Professions of Duplexity: A Prehistory of Ethical Codes in Anthropology, Current Anthropology, 1999, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 101-114.
84. Phillips C., Ross A. Both Sides of the Ditch: The Ethics of Narrating the Past in the Present. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 27-40.
85. Pyburn K.A. Engaged Archaeology: Whose Community? Which Public? In: K. Okamura and A. Matsuda (eds.). New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011, pp. 29-41.
86. Reid J.J. Recent findings on North American prehistory, American Antiquity, 1992, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 195-196.
87. Robertshaw P. Knowledge and power, African Archaeological Review, 1996, Vol. 13, no. 1,
88. pp. 7-9.
89. Rowlands M. The politics of identity in archaeology. In: G. C. Bond, A. Gilliam (eds.). Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 129-143.
90. Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006a.
91. Scarre Ch., Scarre G. Introduction. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006b, pp. 1-12.
92. Scham S.A., Yahya A. Heritage and reconciliation, Journal of Social Archaeology, 2003, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 399-416.
93. Schoenbrun D. Violence and vulnerability in East Africa before 1800 CE: An agenda for research, History Compass, 2006, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 741-760.
94. Shepherd N. Undisciplining Archaeological Ethics. In: Haber A., Shepherd N. (eds.). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015, pp. 10-25.
95. Shnirelman V.A. Alternative prehistory, Journal of European Archaeology, 1995, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-20.
96. Shnirelman V.A. Who gets the past? Competition for ancestors among non-Russian intellectuals in Russia. Washington D. C., Baltimore & London: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
97. Shnirelman V.A. The politics of the past in Dagestan: national unity and symbolic revolt, Europe-Asia Studies, 2018, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 966-990.
98. Smith L. Archaeological theory and the politics of culture heritage. New York: Routledge, 2004.
99. Smith L. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge, 2006.
100. Spriggs M. Pacific archaeologies: contested ground in the construction of Pacific history, The Journal of Pacific History, 1999, Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 109-121.
101. Stout A. Creating prehistory: druids, Ley hunters and archaeologists in pre-war Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
102. Swain H.The ethics of displaying human remains from British archaeological sites, Public archaeology, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 95-100.
103. Thomas D. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
104. Watkins J. Yours, mine, or ours?Conflicts between archaeologists and ethnic groups. In: T.L. Bray (ed.). The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans, and Repatriation. New York: Garland Publishing, 2001, pp. 57-68.
105. Watkins J. Through wary eyes: Indigenous perspectives on archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2005, vol. 34, pp. 429-449.
106. Watkins J. An Indigenous Anthropologist's Perspective on Archaeological Ethics. In: Gnec- co C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015,
107. pp. 21-26.
108. Wright P. On Living in an Old Country.The National Past in Contemporary Britain. London: Verso, 1985.
109. Wynn L. L. Shape Shifting Lizard People, Israelite Slaves, and Other Theories of Pyramid Building. Notes on Labor, Nationalism, and Archaeology in Egypt, Journal of Social Archaeology, 2008, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 272-295.
110. Yellowhorn E. Just Methods, No Madness: Historical Archaeology on the Piikani First Nation. In: Gnecco C., Lippert D. (eds.). Ethics and archaeological praxis. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 245-256.
111. Young J. O. Cultures and the ownership of archaeological finds. In: Scarre Ch., Scarre G. (eds.). The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, pp. 15-31.
112. Zimmerman L.J. Usurping Native American voice. In: T. Bray (ed.). The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans, and Repatriation. New York: Garland Publishing, 2001, pp. 169-184.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
Влияние окружающей среды на развитие цивилизации майя на примере истории города Чальчуапа - крупнейшего археологического памятника горных майя. Земледелие - основа цивилизации майя. Особенности использования агрокалендаря. Достижения майя в мореплавании.
контрольная работа [40,7 K], добавлен 15.11.2010Археология как наука о прошлом человечества, артефактах, культуре и искусстве древнего мира. Основные виды археологических источников, их назначение. Характеристика этапов и методов работы археологов. Критерии классификации археологических находок.
эссе [11,4 K], добавлен 14.05.2015Изучение периода наивысшего расцвета города Тикаль с учетом современных материалов археологических раскопок. Основные исследователи майя. Характеристика основных этапов развития цивилизации майя. Тикаль как один из главных центров цивилизации майя.
курсовая работа [10,6 M], добавлен 06.11.2022Государственные образования Майя. Принципы иерархии в политической системе древнейшей цивилизации. Связь титула "калоомте" со сторонами света. Изменение его значения с течением времени. Правитель Майя и его подчиненные. Военная политика царств Майя.
курсовая работа [332,6 K], добавлен 17.05.2016Военно-историческое наследие Приднестровья. Совершенствование форм работы в деле сохранения историко-культурного наследия. Задачи Государственной целевой программы Приднестровской Молдавской Республики. Проявление героев Полтавской битвы в современности.
реферат [22,6 K], добавлен 10.01.2013Общая характеристика Нового Света как уникальной исторической и культурной лаборатории. Зарождение и падение цивилизации инков. Общая характеристика культуры ацтеков. Письменность, астрономия и религия – одно целое ядро древней цивилизации майя.
дипломная работа [152,5 K], добавлен 23.04.2011Легенда о происхождении инков, их религиозные представления и военные походы с целью расширения границ империи. Великое переселение майя, загадка их календаря и социально-политическая организация общества. Особенности ремесла, торговли и культуры ацтеков.
курсовая работа [95,1 K], добавлен 24.02.2012Общественная организация и религиозные верования. Астрономия и математика майя. Астрономы майя — на службе земледелия. Календарная система майя. Два календаля: хааб – солнечный, и цолкин – религиозный. Письменность и счисление времени у дервних майя.
реферат [18,5 K], добавлен 14.01.2009Майя - группа индейских народов, родственных по языку. Развитие культуры Майя. Период ассимиляции мексиканской культуры. Колониальный период в истории народа Майя. Получение Мексикой независимости от Испании. Письменность и исчисление времени у Майя.
реферат [22,9 K], добавлен 04.01.2010Среда обитания древних майя. Ранние представления о данной народности, периодизация истории. Последние города майя, особенности календаря. Обычаи и социальная организация майя, развитие письма и изобразительного искусства, религиозные верования.
реферат [2,7 M], добавлен 15.03.2013Выяснение того, что по-настоящему убило майяскую цивилизацию: экономика или общество. Цивилизация древних майя. История майя. Майя – одна из ярчайших цивилизаций доколумбовой Америки. Это "культура-загадка". Экономика. Общество.
реферат [22,8 K], добавлен 24.03.2007Зарождение археологических исследований, археология как наука. Характеристика периодов развития русской археологии. Разработка археологической периодизации. Советская археология в послереволюционные годы. Масштабы полевых археологических исследований.
реферат [35,2 K], добавлен 04.03.2013Территория расселения, история Майя. Технико-технологические особенности живописи и скульптуры майя. Архитектура и градостроительство. Артефакты музыкальной, песенной и театральной культуры. Письменность и исчисление времени. Религиозные особенности майя.
реферат [5,8 M], добавлен 05.06.2015Характеристика культури давніх майя. Історії формування цивілізації майя. Система державної влади і суспільний устрій. Релігійні та міфологічні уявлення. Наукові надбання. Художньо-мистецьке життя майя Стародавнє письмо та література. Музика і театр.
курсовая работа [47,9 K], добавлен 20.11.2008Социальный строй древних майя, внешность индейцев. Религия майя и культы. Солнце Кинич-Ахау как один из главных богов. Ритуалы кровопускания у племени. Архитектура и строительство, городской комплекс города Тикаля. Питание, календарь и письменность майя.
реферат [1,9 M], добавлен 30.08.2011Понимание и обоснование места декабристов и их наследия в истории культуры России и сибирского региона. Литературное наследие декабристов на поселении в Забайкалье. Недвижимое наследие декабристов в Бурятии. Первый музей, посвященный декабристам.
курсовая работа [44,1 K], добавлен 26.12.2014Изучение понятия "Мезоамерика" - чего-то вроде Ойкумены, в пределах которой находятся цивилизованные государства, а за ее пределами варварские племена. Основа питания ее жителей и особенности экономической базы развития. Цивилизация Теотихуакан, Майя.
реферат [34,8 K], добавлен 09.04.2012Вивчення виникнення, місця розташування цивілізації Майя – цивілізація в Центральній Америці, що існувала приблизно з 1500 р. до н.е. до іспанського завоювання у ХVІ ст. до н. е. Особливості соціально-економічного та суспільно-політичного розвитку Майя.
курсовая работа [39,9 K], добавлен 05.06.2010Виникнення цивілізації майя. Перемога майя над постійною посухою, убогою рослинністю, великою кількістю отруйних рептилій і скорпіонів. Мотиви дощу і підсічно-вогневого землеробства у творах мистецтва. Соціальний устрій, повсякденне життя і вірування.
реферат [19,7 K], добавлен 16.09.2010Майя - цивилизация в Центральной Америке, существовавшая приблизительно с 2000 г. до н.э., этапы их истории. Искусство древних майя, особенности настенных фресок, применяемые скульптурные приемы, религиозная и мифологическая тематика. Храмы и пирамиды.
презентация [4,3 M], добавлен 09.12.2014
