Археологические конференции как эффективная форма научной коммуникации (сравнительный анализ двух периодических форумов)

79. Zsaek.tsu.ru. (n.d.) Zapadnosibirskayaarkheologo-etnograficheskayakonferentsiya. Letopis' nasheykonferentsii [West Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference. Annals of our conference]. [Online] Available from: http://zsaek.tsu.ru/node/7 (Accessed: 16th June 2020).

80. Anon. (1970) Resheniesoveshchaniyapovoprosamkhronologiiikul'turnoyprinadlezhnostiarkheologicheskikhpamyatnikovZapadnoySibiri, prinyatoe 31 maya 1970 goda [The decision of the meeting on the chronology and cultural affiliation of archaeological sites of Western Siberia, adopted on May 31, 1970]. In: Matyushchenko, V.I. (ed.) Problemykhronologiiikul'turnoyprinadlezhnostiarkheologicheskikhpamyatnikovZapadnoySibiri [The problems of chronology and cultural identity of archaeological monuments of Western Siberia]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 293-296.

81. Anon. (1972) Resheniesoveshchaniyapoproblemamkul'turnoyietnicheskoyprinadlezhnostiarkheologicheskikhpamyatnikovZapadnoySibiri, prinyatoe v Tomske 19 maya 1972 goda [The decision of the meeting on the problems of cultural and ethnicity of archaeological sites of Western Siberia, adopted in Tomsk on May 19, 1972]. IzistoriiSibiri. 7. pp. 293-296.

82. Melnikova, O.M. (2016) Ural'skoearkheologicheskoesoveshchaniekaksobytiepamyatiikakreal'nost' [Ural archaeological meeting as an event of memory and as reality]. In: Chernykh, E.M. (ed.) ArkheologicheskoenasledieUrala: otpervykhotkrytiy k fundamental'nomunauchnomupoznaniyu(XX Ural'skoearkheologicheskoesoveshchanie) [The Archaeological Heritage of the Urals: From the First Discoveries to Fundamental Scientific Knowledge (The 20th Ural Archaeological Meeting)]. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University. pp. 226-228.

83. Matyushchenko, V.I. (2001) Kaketobylo? [How it was?]. VestnikOmskogouniversiteta - Herald of Omsk University. 3. pp. 21-24.

84. Anon. (1976) Resheniesoveshchaniyapoproblиme “Ekonomikaisotsial'nayastrukturadrevnegonaseleniyaZapadnoySibiri”, prinyatoe v Tomske 22 marta 1975 goda [The decision of the meeting on the problem “Economics and social structure of the ancient population of Western Siberia”, adopted in Tomsk on March 22, 1975]. IzistoriiSibiri. 21. pp. 263-265.

85. Chindina, L.A. (2005) Traditsiiinasledie [Traditions and Heritage]. In: Chindina, L.A. (ed.) Problemyistoriko-kul'turnogorazvitiyadrevnikhitraditsionnykhobshchestvZapadnoySibiriisopredel'nykhterritoriy [The problems of historical and cultural development of ancient and traditional societies of Western Siberia and adjacent territories]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 4-7.

86. Chindina, L.A. (1998) TridtsatiletniyetaparkheologiiTomskogouniversiteta [Thirty years of archeology at Tomsk University]. In: Chernyak, E.I. (ed.) IzistoriiSibiri. K 30-letiyu laboratorii [From the History of Siberia. To the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Laboratory]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 17-24.

87. Molodin, V.I. (2015) Ocherkiistoriisibirskoyarkheologii [Essays on the history of Siberian archeology]. Novosibirsk: SB RAS.

88. Chindina, L.A. &Chernaya, M.P. (2010) K istoriiZapadnosibirskikharkheologo-etnograficheskikhkonferentsiy. Vmestopredisloviya [On the history of West Siberian archaeological and ethnographic conferences. For the foreword]. In: Chernaya, M.P. (ed.) Kul'turakaksistema v istoricheskomkontekste: OpytZapadno-Sibirskikharkheologo-etnograficheskikhsoveshchaniy [Culture as a System in a Historical Context: Experience of West Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Meetings]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 3-5.

89. Moshinskaya, V.I. (1973) O vozmozhnostyakhetnicheskoyinterpretatsiiarkheologicheskikhmaterialov [On the possibilities of ethnic interpretation of archaeological materials]. IzistoriiSibiri. 7. pp. 3-11.

90. Kosarev, M.F. (1975) Materialysoveshchaniyapoproblemamkul'turnoyietnicheskoyprinadlezhnostiarkheologicheskikhpamyatnikovZapadnoySibiri. Tomsk, 1973 [Materials of the meeting on the problems of cultural and ethnic affiliation of archaeological sites of Western Siberia. Tomsk, 1973]. Sovetskayaarkheologiya. 3. pp. 232-238.

91. Dremov, V.A. (1978) Kakzhilos' sibiryaku v drevnosti? [How did the Siberian live in ancient times?]. Krasnoeznamya. N. 69. p. 3.

92. Novikova, N.I. (2016) One-man band. Interview with Senior Doctorate, Professor N. A. Tomilov. VestnikOmskogouniversiteta. Seriya “Istoricheskiyenauki ” -- Herald of Omsk University. Historical Studies. 3(11). pp. 10-23. (In Russian).

93. Kosarev, M.F. (1981) Nekotoryemetodologicheskieproblemyzapadnosibirskoyarkheologii [Some methodological problems of West Siberian archeology]. In: Pletneva, L.M. (ed.) Metodologicheskieaspektyarkheologicheskikhi etnograficheskikhissledovaniy v ZapadnoySibiri [Methodological aspects of archaeological and ethnographic research in Western Siberia]. Tom: Tomsk State University. pp. 3-7.

94. Chindina, L.A. (1984) U arkheologovietnografovgotovitsyaSvodpamyatnikov [Archaeologists and Ethnographers are preparing a Code of Monuments]. Krasnoeznamya. 97. p. 3.

95. Chernaya, M.P. (2018) Tomsk, tomichiirusskayaarkheologiya v tvorcheskoysud'beVyacheslavaIvanovichaMolodina [Tomsk, Tomsk residents and Russian archeology in the creative fate of VyacheslavIvanovichMolodin]. In: Derevyanko, A.P. &Molodin, V.I. (eds) Mul'tidistsiplinarnyeaspektyizucheniyadrevneyisrednevekovoyistorii: k 70-letiyu akad. V.I. Molodina [Multidisciplinary aspects of the study of ancient and medieval history: on the 70th anniversary of Academician V.I. Molodina]. Novosibirsk: SB RAS. pp. 69-83.

96. Bobrova, A.I. (ed.) (1997) Aktual'nyeproblemydrevneyisrednevekovoyistoriiSibiri [Topical Problems of Siberian Ancient and Medieval History]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. pp. 21-28.

97. Chindina, L.A. (1984) DrevnyayaistoriyaSrednegoPriob'ya v epokhuzheleza. Kulayskayakul'tura [The Ancient History of the Middle Ob in the Era of Iron. The Kulay Culture]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.

98. Chernaya, M.P. (2017) XVII Zapadnosibirskayaarkheologo-etnograficheskayakonferentsiya v Tomske: novyy shag v 45-letney istorii ZSAEK [XVII western Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference in Tomsk: a new step in the 45-year history]. VestnikNovosibirskogogosudar- stvennogouniversiteta. Ser. Istoriya, filologiya - Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology. 16(3). pp. 141-151. (In Russian).

Esmira R. Ismaiylova, Kemerovo State Vocational School (Kemerovo, Russian Federation).

ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCES AS AN EFFECTIVE FORM OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO REGULAR FORUMS)

Keywords: regular conferences; Tomsk; Kemerovo.

The purpose of the article is a comparative analysis of two academic conferences that are held regularly: the West Siberian Archaeological Meeting / West Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference (WSAM/WSAEC) at Tomsk State University (TSU) and regular All-Union conferences on archaeology of the Scythian period at Kemerovo State University (KemSU). The study is based on the materials of these conferences and unpublished archival data.

Until 1958, no archaeological conferences had been held in Siberia. Historically, it was the university in Tomsk that became the first to host regular forums as the University archaeological museum existed since the 19th century and the institution attracted researchers having received such a prominent organizer as V.I. Matyushchenko in the 1960s. The 1st WSAM took place in 1970. The opening in 1968 of the Problem Research Laboratory of History, Archaeology and Ethnography became an important prerequisite for the integration of interdisciplinary research and holding regular academic conferences at TSU.

In Kemerovo, the idea of organizing regular conferences on the issues of archaeology of the Scythian period appeared also in the late 1970s, all conditions having been developed for this. KemSU had a leader, Doctor of History, Professor A.I. Martynov who defended his thesis in archaeology. In 1975, the Department of Archeology was established at KemSU, consolidating all archaeologists of Kemerovo region and conducting training. During the 1950-1970s, a significant source base was accumulated on the Tagar archaeological culture of the Scythian circle. As a result, the work of the regular All-Union Conference on topical issues of the Scythian-Siberian world was organized. These conferences became a milestone in the development of the archeology of Eurasia of the Scythian time.

At present, WSAM/WSAEC have 50-year-long history and include 18 forums. They made a huge contribution to the development of theoretical, methodological and practical issues of archaeology of Western Siberia and neighbouring regions. It is noteworthy that Tomsk colleagues set the topic of each conference and choose the most pressing issues every time. Such a longstanding tradition of holding regular conferences in Tomsk was formed owing to the continuity of its organizers, the preservation of their interest and the search for new issues and forms for conducting WSAEC. The significance of conferences in Tomsk is proved not only by the development of archaeology and ethnography of Western Siberia, but also by the preservation of the role of TSU as a leading university in Siberia.

Размещено на Allbest.ru