Peculiarities of zemstvos introduction in Volyn province (the second half of the XIX th – the beginning of the XX th century)
Analysis historical conditions and features of the introduction of the institute of zemstvos in the Volyn province. Specificity of zemstvos as socio-political institutions. The fundamental difference between zemstvos of the 1903 and 1911 models is shown.
Рубрика | История и исторические личности |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 27.03.2023 |
Размер файла | 26,3 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Peculiarities of zemstvos introduction in Volyn province (the second half of the XIX th - the beginning of the XX th century)
Valery Bortnikov
PhD (History), PhD hab. (Political Sciences), Professor of the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 24 Chopin Street, Lutsk, Ukraine
Yaroslav Yarosh
PhD hab. (Political Sciences), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of History of Political Science and National Security, Volyn National University named after Lesya Ukrainka, 24 Chopin Street, Lutsk, Ukraine
Abstract
The reform of local self-government, administrative and territorial organization on the basis of decentralization, which is taking place in Ukraine, highlights the problem of studying and analyzing historical traditions and forms of local self-government in Ukraine, in general, and its regions, in particular. The purpose of the study is to analyze the historical conditions and features of zemstvos institute introduction in Volyn province. The research methodology is based on a set of general scientific and special research methods, in which the chief focus is paid to institutional, structural and functional, problem and chronological methods and approaches. The Conclusions. In 1864 the introduction of zemstvos in the central and southern provinces is an organic part of the "great reforms" of the second half of the XIX th century that took place in the Russian Empire. The specifics of zemstvos as socio-political institutions have been elucidated. In Volyn province, the law on zemstvos of 1903 came into force on July 1, 1904. In the article there has been elucidated a fundamental difference between zemstvos of1903 and 1911, which consisted in the evolution of zemstvos institution from state institutions to their reorganization, as local governments. The organizational structure of zemstvos, the order of their formation, etc., have been highlighted. There has been done the analysis of "Regulations on Provincial and County Zemstvo Institutions of January 1, 1864", "Regulations on Management of Zemstvos in the Provinces of Vilna, Vitebsk, Volyn, Grodno, Kyiv, Kovenska, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk" of April 2, 1903, reports at the first annual meeting of Volyn Provincial Committee for Zemstvo Affairs in 1904, "On Determining the Order of Subordination Actions of Institutions and People to the Department of Land Management", etc. In general, the path of zemstvos institutional development was significantly delayed in Volyn. During their formation, a considerable attention was paid to limiting the Polish influence in favour of the Russian one.
Key words: Volyn province, Right-Bank Ukraine, Russian Empire, zemstvos, local self-government.
ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ЗАПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ЗЕМСТВ У ВОЛИНСЬКІЙ ГУБЕРНІЇ (друга половина ХІХ - початок ХХ ст.)
Валерій БОРТНІКОВ
кандидат історичних наук, доктор політичних наук, професор кафедри політології та публічного управління Волинського національного університеті імені Лесі Українки вул. Шопена, 24, м. Луцьк, Україна
Ярослав ЯРОШ
доктор політичних наук, доцент, декан факультету історії політології та національної безпеки Волинського національного університеті імені Лесі Українки, вул. Шопена, 24, м. Луцьк, Україна,
Реформа місцевого самоврядування і адміністративно-територіального устрою на засадах децентралізації, що відбувається в Україні, актуалізує проблему вивчення й аналізу історичних традицій та форм організації місцевого самоврядування на теренах України загалом та її регіонах, зокрема. Метою дослідження є аналіз історичних умов та особливостей запровадження інституту земств у Волинській губернії. Методологія дослідження базується на сукупності загальнонаукових і спеціальних методів дослідження, де головну увагу приділено інституційному, структурно-функціональному й проблемно-хронологічному методам і підходам. Висновки. Запровадження земств у центральних та південних губерніях у 1864 р. є органічною складовою часу "великих реформ" другої половини ХІХ ст., що відбувалися у Російській імперії. Розкрита специфіка земств як суспільно-політичних інститутів. У Волинській губернії закон про земства зразка 1903 р. вступів у силу 1 липня 1904 р. Показана принципова відмінність земств зразка 1903 та 1911 рр., яка полягала в еволюції їх інституту від державних установ до реорганізації як органів місцевого самоврядування. Розкрито організаційну структуру земств, порядок їх формування тощо. Зроблено аналіз "Положення про губернські та повітові земські установи від 1 січня 1864 року", "Положення про управління земським господарством в губерніях Віленській, Вітебській, Волинській, Гродненській, Київській, Ковельській, Мінській, Могилевській і Подільській" від 2 квітня 1903 р., доповіді на перших річних зборах Волинського губернського комітету у справах земського господарства 1904 р. "Про визначення порядку дій підпорядкованих управлінню по справах земського господарства установ і осіб" та ін. Загалом, шлях інституційної розбудови земств на Волині відбувався зі значним запізненням. Під час їх формування значну увагу приділено обмеженню польського впливу на користь російського. historical zemstvos province
Ключові слова: Волинська губернія, Правобережна Україна, Російська імперія, земства, місцеве самоврядування.
The Problem Statement. The activity of higher and central bodies of state power, the apparatus of territorial administration of the South-Western region is conditioned by a set of circumstances related to the division of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the process of integration of Right-Bank Ukrainian lands into the Russian Empire (Bortnikov & Bortnikova, 2021, p. 49). At that time, "economic processes and geopolitical changes enabled important individual and daily changes in the society" (Udod, 2021, p. 208).
This period in the history of Volyn is marked by the existence of insurmountable contradictions between the government and large social groups of the class society on the one hand, and amog social classes - on the other hand. We mean, first of all, the Polish nobility, which dominated in the socio-economic, cultural and spiritual spheres, and the Ukrainian peasantry - the bulk of the population of the province, deprived of basic civil rights (Bortnikov, 2015, p. 5). In general, the post-reform period against the background of a rapid development of productive forces "was a period of a significant revival of various social groups self-organization" (Shandra, 2021, p. 75).
In 1864, in the central provinces of the Russian Empire, the introduction of zemstvos as an institution of a local self-government became an important safeguard in the direction of limiting the tsarist autocracy, development of a public initiative and creativity, revival of economic and cultural activities at local places. On January 1, 1864, the emperor approved the corresponded Regulations (PSZ-2. №40457) та ін.
Zemstvos were established to manage economic and socio-cultural affairs; they were responsible for the construction and management of local roads, schools, hospitals, charities, providing the population with food, organization of land lending and insurance, promotion of agronomic knowledge, improvement in the handicrafts sphere, organization of land statistics, promotion of trade, industry, etc. At the same time, this institute helped to optimize the distribution of power between the center and the local authorities. According to V. Shandra, "these were those spheres of social needs which the bureaucratic state could not cope with" (Shandra, 2020, p. 52).
However, in Volyn province, as in Right-Bank Ukraine in general, zemstvos, as local selfgovernment bodies, were introduced much later.
The Analysis of Recent Publications. The subject of modern foreign and domestic scholars' attention is the organization issue of local self-government and zemstvos in Volyn province in the context of the realities and traditions of the Ukrainian state formation of the second half of the XIXth - the beginning of the XXth centuries. In particular: A. Berezhna, D. Beauvoir, A. Bortnikov, O. Budnytsky, M. Volkhonsky, A. Hetmansky, B. Hud, M. Dolbylov, A. Karelina, V Korobeynikov, O. Pryshchepa, O. Reyent, S. Reznichenko, V. Shandra, T. Sharovara, T. Shcherba and the others.
According to domestic scholars, for many centuries the Ukrainian people deprived of their own statehood were forced to stick to their traditions, customs, folklore to survive in the imperial environment. In fact, Ukraine has never had the right conditions to develop its own traditions. Accordingly, in order not to become a source of foreign cultures, we need to study our own democratic traditions of state-building thoroughly (Bortnikova, 2018, с. 56).
The purpose of the research is to analyze the historical conditions and features of zemstvos institution introduction in Volyn province, their evolution from state to elected institutions with broad powers to resolve local issues.
The Results of the Research. The system of zemstvo local public administration bodies was not perfect, as zemstvos functioned only at the level of provinces and counties: they did not have a lower zemstvo unit at the level of volosts, as well as a central national representation. According to the right remarks of contemporaries, zemstvos were "a building without a foundation and roof' (Korobejnikov, 2000, p. 117). This structure of zemstvos was not accidental, because otherwise, they would be a powerful political force, and it did not correspond to the interests of autocratic power. At the end of the 1870s, owing to the efforts of zemstvo liberal movement activists, it was possible to unite the efforts of some zemstvos. Five provincial zemstvo assemblies - Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Tver, Poltava and Samara - called for convening of Zemstvo Congress, which took place in Moscow, in April of 1879. In the autumn of 1904, the authorities allowed zemstvos to hold all-Russian meetings. On September 8, a meeting of the Bureau of National Congresses took place, at which it was decided to convene a Congress of zemstvo activists in Moscow on November 6, 7 and outlined a programme. However, the Congress was not authorized by the authorities and was held in private with the permission of the Minister of the Interior (Volhonskij, 2002, p. 3). Only with the beginning of World War I there was created all-Russian organization - the All-Russian Zemstvo Union.
In the second half of the XIXth - at the beginning of the XXth centuries there was a wide-ranging debate in government circles about the expediency of implementing zemstvo reform in the annexed territories, as the intensified anti-Polish policy after the uprising of 1863 gradually drove the Poles out of the financial and administrative centers of the South-Western region (Melnychuk, 2021, p. 35). In contrast to the central provinces, the introduction of zemstvos in Right-Bank Ukraine lasted for half a century in general. During the enactment of the Provincial and County Zemstvo Regulations of 1864, the government refused to introduce them in nine western provinces for purely political reasons. Zemstvos in Arkhanhelsk, Astrakhan and Bessarabian regions also demanded a special procedure for the application and implementation (PSZ-2. №40459).
The needs for socio-economic and cultural development of the country, growing political tensions, required the central government to improve the entire structure of a local public administration, and therefore the period of the 90s of the XIXth century became the time of heated discussions about the future of zemstvos. Opponents of its introduction were such influential tsarist government officials as the Minister of Finance S. Witte (1892 - 1903), who argued that, firstly, "self-government does not correspond to the autocratic system of the state" and secondly, "zemstvo cannot be considered a model institution for the local economy" and can be replaced by special government bodies easily (Karelin, 2006, p. 191). The latter was also against the introduction of zemstvos in the western provinces. On the contrary, the supporters of the expansion of zemstvos public administration on the territory of Right-Bank of Ukraine were the Minister of Internal Affairs I. L. Horemykin (1895 - 1899), Kyiv Governor L. P. Tomar (1885 - 1898), Volyn Governor S. P. Sukhodolsky (1892 - 1896), and the others. The young Russian Emperor Nicholas II (1894 - 1917) was also positive about the introduction of zemstvos in the western provinces. The point of view of those statesmen who considered it expedient and necessary to extend zemstvo practice to the western lands of the empire won, albeit with certain restrictions.
The compromise resulted in a draft regulation elaborated by the new Minister of the Interior, D. S. Sypyahin (1900 - 1902), who shared S. Witte's view that the introduction of electoral- based provincial institutions on the western outskirts was premature. Instead of zemstvo assemblies and administrations, it proposed provincial and county committees, as well as provincial and county councils for zemstvo affairs consisting of the nobility and councilors from among the local residents of the taxable state, appointed by the administration. The provincial committee included the governor (chairman), provincial and county leaders of the nobility, whose positions in the province were replaced by government appointments, representatives of the main departmental administrative structures, essential members of the provincial presence, members of the provincial council and the mayor, as well as zemstvos (two from the county), appointed by the Minister of the Interior on the recommendation proposal of the governor. County committees consisting of the nobility (chairman) leaders, administrators, all zemstvo chiefs and tax inspectors, representatives of departmental institutions, mayors, zemstvo county leaders and parish elders, who were appointed by the governor, met only for a preliminary discussion of the most important matters of zemstvo affairs.
Executive power relied on the provincial and county zemstvo councils. The first ones consisted of a chairman and three members - all appointed by the Minister of the Interior, the second ones - of the county leader of the nobility (chairman), a clerk, a tax inspector, two zemstvo leaders and indispensable members of the board, appointed by the governor. That is, zemstvo institutions in this case were under the close care of the local administration.
County committees were deprived of the possibility of the least influence on the activities of the provincial committee and control over the expenditure of zemstvo taxes collected in the counties.
The draft was adopted by the majority of votes after discussion at the meeting of the State Council. Under the new Minister of the Interior, V K. Pleve (1902 - 1904), the draft came into force. On April 2, 1903, Nicholas II approved the "Regulations on the Management of Zemstvo in the Provinces of Vilno, Vitebsk, Volyn, Grodno, Kyiv, Kovenska, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk". However, in the draft it was not specified the exact date of its entry into force, but there was only a special permit (PSZ-3. №22757). In Volyn province, the law on zemstvos of 1903 model came into force on July 1, 1904.
With the establishment of new zemstvos, local orders of public care were abolished, as well as the positions of clerks and their assistants in the provincial administrative committees. The department of zemstvo management included: 1) management of local zemstvo duties in cash and natural duties; 2) management of capital and other property; 3) taking care of providing enough food to the local population and providing them with food aid; 4) maintenance of roads and other road constructions and piers on rivers in a proper condition; 5) arrangement and maintenance of zemstvo post office, assistance in the development of telegraph and telephone connections; 6) management of mutual provincial insurance; 7) arrangement and maintenance of the medical unit, care for a proper sanitation and prevention of epidemics. Managing God-pleasing institutions and caring for the poor; 8) arrangement and maintenance of the veterinary part in the counties, protection of animals from infectious diseases, etc .; 9) care for fire prevention; 10) organization and development of primary and vocational education; 11) promoting the development of agriculture, trade and industry, environmental protection, etc. (Bortnikov, 2015, pp. 242-243).
In 1904, the introduction of zemstvos in Volyn province was not fully legal and organizational in the beginning. However, it cannot be said that there were no documents regulating the work of zemstvos. Thus, in 1904 the report #3 at the first annual meeting of the Volyn Provincial Committee for Zemstvo Affairs is devoted to this issue: "On Determining the Procedure for Actions of Institutions and Persons Subordinated to the Department of Land Management" (State Archives of Zhytomyr Region (SAZhR), f. 183, d. 1, c. 11, pp. 92-96). This report also contained a document regulating the activities of institutions subordinate to the Department of Land Management of the province - "Temporary Instruction on the Procedure of Institutions and People Subordinate to the Department of Land Management of Volyn Province" In particular, the instructions defined the responsibilities of the provincial administration and county administrations, as well as their procedure.
Under conditions of a revolutionary upsurge, during the first bourgeois-democratic revolution in Russia, the existence of zemstvos of this type in the western provinces no longer corresponded to the new socio-political realities understood by the majority of farsighted politicians. Therefore, in 1906, under the leadership of P. A. Stolypin, a new draft law was developed for the nine western provinces, which, under conditions of proportional representation, guaranteed the Russians at least half of the zemstvo positions. This draft also takes into account the main shortcomings of the Regulations of 1903 in terms of improving the financial situation of zemstvos and cities: it was proposed to abolish the law on the limits of zemstvo taxation, to transfer to zemstvos and cities the right to collect real estate tax, as well as part of the income tax, etc. All this was to strengthen the material base of local governments. However, during the discussion of the draft in the State Duma, discussions and debates on the expediency and democracy of some of its provisions, as well as the election procedures in zemstvos lasted for almost five years. At the same time, in addition to the draft of P. A. Stolypin, there were the others.
Finally, on March 14, 1911, in the form of zemstvo supreme decree, already on a new more democratic legal basis, as bodies of public self-government, it was introduced in six western provinces: Vitebsk, Volyn, Kyiv, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk (Svod zakonov Rossijskoj imperii, 1915, pp. 3-11).
The decision to introduce elected zemstvos in the annexed territories was caused, first of all, by the need to change the procedure of electing members of the State Council (upper house of the State Duma). Traditionally, large landowners were elected from the western provinces - the Poles, and that could not satisfy the ruling circles. It was assumed that giving the majority of seats in zemstvos to the Orthodox population would ensure the election of the required number of members of the State Council from among the representatives of the Russian nobility.
According to the election legislation, instead of the estates of the curia, as in other zemstvo provinces, national curias were introduced there. For the election of zemstvo leaders in Volyn, Kyiv and Podilsk provinces, county election meetings and congresses were divided into two departments: "Russian" and "Polish". The norms of the number of leaders elected by each branch were established in such way as to guarantee the superiority of the representatives of the Orthodox population in the administrative bodies of the zemstvo self-government - county and provincial assemblies. Thus, in three Right-Bank provinces, only 13.9% of county departments were elected from "Polish" departments, while 86.1% were elected from "Russian" departments and rural communities, and 15% and 85% from provincial branches, respectively (Reznychenko, 1999, pp. 143-144). The superiority of the Orthodox population representatives was guaranteed by the law requirement in the election of executive bodies - zemstvos - to provide an absolute majority of seats to people from the first ("Russian") department and rural communities.
In order to avoid misunderstandings in Right-Bank Ukraine, where a significant part of the population were also the Jews, the Senate Decree of March 14, 1911 included Art. 87, which deprived them of voting rights.
On September 11, 1911, on the day of P. Stolypin's death, Kyiv Governor A. Hirs had a conversation with the latter about the introduction of zemstvos in the South-Western region. From the conversation it becomes clear how much P. A. Stolypin was aware of the situation and was in favour of zemstvos speedy introduction in Right-Bank Ukraine (Girs, 1991, p. 92).
On August 7 and 8, 1911, the first extraordinary session of Volyn Provincial Zemstvo Assembly was held, devoted to the formation of public administration bodies of Volyn Zemstvo. The minutes of the session give a complete picture of this historical event in the life of the population of Volyn province. The meeting was chaired by P. A. Demidov, a provincial leader of the nobility, a provincial zemstvo speaker of Kremenets district. The members of the meeting were county leaders of the nobility, heads of county zemstvos, provincial officials and representatives of various departments. The honorary right to open the meeting was entrusted to Volyn governor, Count O. P. Kutaisov (1909 - 1912). The executive body of zemstvo was the provincial administration in the number of four people: the chairman and three members. By voting the chairman of the provincial council was established a salary of four thousand rubles per year, members - three thousand rubles. V. E. Dvertsytsky was elected the chairman of the provincial council (Protokoly zasedanij Volynskogo gubernskogo sobraniya, 1911, p. 30).
The election was held by closed ballot in black and white. The same way there were held of three board members. Subsequently, there were elected the Deputy Chairman of the Provincial Council, a member of the Provincial in Zemstvo and city affairs of the presence, two members of the Provincial Commission for Land Management, two members of the Provincial School Council, a member of the Agronomic Council and a candidate for it, four members to the Council for Local Economy, two members of the Peasant Bank. The commissions of the provincial zemstvo assembly were also elected: audit commission (12 people), road (7), medical (5), school (5), agricultural (6), insurance (5) and general (4).
The activity of Volyn zemstvo is clearly divided into two periods: from July of 1904 to August of 1911 and from August 1911 until their liquidation in 1919. On December 8, 1904, Volyn Provincial Presence in Peasant Affairs received a governor's circular dated No 948, addressed to Volyn Provincial Administration and all county administrations for land affairs, city administrations and elders, police departments, peace mediators and the township board of Volyn province. Its content is of fundamental importance to understanding the role of zemstvos in the social life of the province. In addition to the exact date of the implementation beginning of the above-mentioned provision on zemstvos in Volyn, the level of the powers becomes clear, for example, in such a vital issue as pricing. The document emphasized the following: "In the province, with the introduction on July 1 of this year (1904) .... of the law of April 2, 1903 on the management of the zemstvo, the county councils for land affairs are obliged to determine the prices of bread, fodder, etc., in the county every month, from September to May" (State Archives of Volyn Region, f. 3, d. 1, c. 100, pp. 400-400v.).
According to N. Polonska-Vasylenko, on Right-Bank Ukraine, "zemstvos spread only in 1911, because the government was afraid to allow the Polish nobility to influence the self-government of this region" (Polonska-Vasylenko, 2002, p. 315). Some contemporary Ukrainian and Russian authors claim that in the South-Western region "resolving the issue of the formation of zemstvos in Right-Bank Ukraine began with the legislative act of 1904, and its actual implementation in practice took place in 1911" (Sharavara, 2005, p. 4), the others emphasize that "there were no zemstvos here until 1911" (Berezhnaya, Budnickyi & Dolbilov, 2007, p. 295).
It is obvious that the zemstvo as a state institution (not an institution of local selfgovernment!) was introduced in Volyn province in 1904, not in 1911. An explanation of this issue can be found in the report No 53 "On the Rights of the Provincial Committee for Zemstvo Affairs to Appeal the Orders of Central Administrations" at a session of Volyn Provincial Administration in 1909. The report stated that Minsk Provincial Committee for Zemstvo Affairs authorized its provincial administration to appeal to the Senate against the Minister of the Interior's order to abolish the provincial committee on the payment of money for the lower ranks during the mobilization. The Senate, appealing to the decree of August 8, 1908 No 9267, rejected this complaint, "due to the fact that the Provincial Committees for Land Management in the provinces of Vitebsk, Volyn, Kyiv, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk consist of officials of various departments and zemstvos appointed by the Minister of the Interior, who are equated with officials, and therefore are government agencies (italics. - the authors), which operate only in accordance with a special Regulation, and secondly because the Provincial Committees for Land Management are not granted by law the right to appeal against orders of central administrations" (Doklady Volynskoj gubernskoj upravy, 1909, p. 69). Thus, the document leaves no doubt about the nature of the zemstvos of 1903, as public authorities, and therefore we have no reason to deny the existence of the institution of zemstvos in Volyn during the period of 1904 - 1911.
The fundamental difference between zemstvos of the model of 1911 was the method of forming their composition, which was based on democratic principles, as the administrative and executive bodies of zemstvos were elected by the local community. That is why, zemstvos of 1911 were called "elected zemstvos". Thus, in his speech, at the opening of the second extraordinary session of Volyn Provincial Zemstvo Assembly, its chairman P. A. Demydov emphasized: "Gentlemen, the elected zemstvo in Volyn - a new matter - a difficult matter - a difficult matter" (Zhurnal Volynskogo gubernskogo zemskogo sobraniya, 2012, pp. 2-3).
The Conclusions
Thus, the zemstvo reform of the second half of the 1860s took place on the western outskirts of the Russian Empire with a delay of several decades, and the introduction of elected zemstvos - half a century. During their formation, a considerable focus was on limiting the Polish influence in favour of Russia. From the time of the First Russian Revolution of 1905 - 1907, the same norms and rules were already in force in Volyn province as in the central regions of the empire. Despite the shortcomings and limitations due to the nature of the tsarist autocracy, zemstvos were an effective means of organizing many spheres of local communities life, and the experience of their work enriched the world palette of public administration at local places. Perspective is studying zemstvos positive experience in solving a wide range of problems of local communities on the basis of subsidiarity, their distancing from the central government and the specifics of tax policy.
Bibliography
1. Berezhnaya, L. A., Budnickyi, O. V. & Dolbilov, M. D. etc. (Comps.). (2007). Zapadnye okrainy Rossijskoj imperii [The western outskirts of the Russian Empire]. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 608 p. [in Russian]
2. Bortnikov, V. (2015). Orhany derzhavnoi vlady ta mistsevoho samovriaduvannia na Volyni (kinets XVIII - pochatokXX st.) [Bodies of state power and local self-government in Volyn (end of the XVIIIth - beginning of the XXth century)]. Lutsk: SNU im. Lesi Ukrainky, 450 p. [in Ukrainian] Bortnikov, V. I. & Bortnikova, A. V. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia orhaniv dvorianskoho samovriaduvannia Volynskoi hubernii (kinets XVIII - 30-ti roky XlXh st.) [Peculiarities of the formation of the bodies of aristocratic self-government of the Volyn province (the end of the XVIIIth - the 30s of the XIXth century)]. Storinky istorii, 51, 48-59. [in Ukrainian]
3. Bortnikova, A. V. (2018). Mistseve samovriaduvannia na Volyni: suspilno-politychni tradytsii i suchasnyi protses detsentralizatsii [Local self-government in Volyn: socio-political traditions and the modern process of decentralization]. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk, 372 p. [in Ukrainian]
4. Derzhavnyi arkhiv Volynskoi oblasti [State Archives of Volyn Region - SAVR]
5. Derzhavnyi arkhiv Zhytomyrskoi oblasti [State Archives of Zhytomyr Region - SAZhR]
6. Girs, A. (1991). Smert Stolypina. Iz vospominanij Kievskogo gubernatora [Death of Stolypin. From the memoirs of the Kyiv Governor]. In Stolypin A. P. A. Stolypin 1862 - 1911. Reprint. vosproizved. izd. 1927 g. (pp. 86-102.). Moskva: Planeta. [in Russian]
7. Karelin, A. P. (2006). Problemy mestnogo upravleniya v Rossii na rubezhe XIX - XX vv. [Problems of local government in Russia at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries]. Istoriya i istoriki: istoriograficheskij vestnik. (pp. 183-203). Moskva: Nauka. [in Russian]
8. Korobejnikov, V. (2000). Zemstva kak forma upravleniya delami obshhestva i gosudarstva [Zemstvos as a form of managing the affairs of society and the state]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 1, 115-120. [in Russian]
9. Melnychuk, K. (2021). Selianske samovriaduvannia na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini u druhii polovyni XIX - na pochatku XX st.: formuvannia kadrovoho skladu [Peasant self-government in the Right Bank of Ukraine in the second half of the XIX - early XX centuries: the formation of personnel]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 3, 28-40. [in Ukrainian]
· pravah. (1909). O pravah Gubernskogo Komiteta po delam zemskogo hozyajstva po obzhalovaniyu rasporyazhenij centralnyh Upravlenij [On the rights of the Provincial Committee for Zemstvo Affairs to appeal against orders of the Central Offices]. Doklady Volynskoj gubernskoj upravy po delam zemskogo hozyajstva IX obyknovennomu sobraniyu Gubernskogo komiteta 1909 goda. Ch. 1. № 1-197, 53 (pp. 63-70). Zhitomir: Jelektricheskaya tipografiya t-va "N. A. Brodovich". [in Russian] O rasprostranenii. (1915). O rasprostranenii dejstviya polozhenij o zemskih uchrezhdeniyah na Vitebskuyu, Volynskuyu, Kievskoyu, Minskuyu, Mogilevskuyu i Podolskuyu gubernii: imennoj Vysochajshij ukaz ot 14 marta 1911 g. [On the extension of the provisions on zemstvo institutions to Vitebsk, Volyn, Kyiv, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk provinces: nominal Supreme Decree of March 14, 1911]. Svod zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. T. II. 1) Polozhenie o gubernskih i uezdnyh zemskih uchrezhdeniyah. 2) Polozhenie ob obshhestvennom upravlenii gorodov. 3) Uchrezhdenie grazhdanskogo upravleniya kazakov. (pp. 3-11). Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian]
10. Polonska-Vasylenko, N. (2002). Istoriia Ukrainy: u 2 t. T. 2. Vid seredyny XVII stolittia do 1923 roku [History of Ukraine: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. From the middle of the XVII century to 1923]. 4-te vyd., stereotyp. Kyiv: Lybid, 608 p. [in Ukrainian]
11. Protokoly zasedanij Volynskogo gubernskogo sobraniya. (1911). Protokoly zasedanij Volynskogo gubernskogo sobraniya pervoj chrezvychajnoj sessii 7 i 8 avgusta 1911 goda [Minutes of the meetings of the Volyn provincial assembly of the first emergency session on August 7 and 8, 1911]. Zhitomir: Jelektricheskaya tipografiyatov-va "N. A. Brodovich", 34 p. [in Russian]
12. PSZ-2. (1870). Vysochajshe utverzhdennoe Polozhenie o gubernskih i uezdnyh zemskih uchrezhdeniyah 1 yanvarya 1864 g. [The highest approved Regulations on provincial and district zemstvo institutions January 1, 1864]. Polnyj svod zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobranie vtoroe. Sankt- Peterburg: V tip. vtorogo otdela sobstvennogo E. I. V kancelyarii, Vol. ХХХІХ. [in Russian]
13. PSZ-3. (1905). Polozhenie ob upravlenii zemskim hozyajstvom v guberniyah Vilenskoj, Vitebskoj, Volynskoj, Grodnenskoj, Kievskoj, Kovenskoj, Minskoj, Mogilevskoj i Podolskoj [Regulations on the management of the zemstvo in the provinces of Vilna, Vitebsk, Volyn, Grodno, Kiev, Kaunas, Minsk, Mogilev and Podolsk]. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj imperii. Sobranie trete. Vol. XXIII. Otdelenie I. Ot № 22360-23838. I dopolneniya. Sankt-Peterburg: Gos. tip. [in Russian]
14. Reznychenko, S. (1999). Zaprovadzhennia zemstv na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini [Introduction of zemstvos on the Right Bank of Ukraine]. Kyivska starovyna, 4, 142-150. [in Ukrainian]
15. Shandra, V. (2020). Dvorianstvo "ukrainskykh hubernii" Rosiiskoi imperii u zemskomu samovriaduvanni (1860-ti - pochatok XX st.) [The nobility of the "Ukrainian provinces" of the Russian Empire in zemstvo selfgovernment (1860s - early twentieth century)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 4, 46-60. [in Ukrainian]
16. Shandra, V. (2021). Predstavnytstvo interesiv ahrarnoho kapitalu v Rosiiskii imperii (druha polovyna XIX - pochatok XX st.) [Representation of the interests of agricultural capital in the Russian Empire (second half of the XIX - early XX centuries.)]. Storinky istorii, 51, 73-91. [in Ukrainian] Sharavara, T. (2005). Sotsialno-ekonomichna diialnist zemstv v Ukraini (1864 - 1917 rr.): istoriohrafiia [Socio-economic activity of zemstvos in Ukraine (1864 - 1917): historiography]. (Extended abstract of Candidate's thesis). Kyiv, 20 p. [in Ukrainian]
17. Udod, O. (2021). Reient O. Sotsialno-ekonomichni ta politychni transformatsii v Ukraini (kinets XVIII - pershi desiatylittia XX st.). Kn. 1-2 [Reyent O. Socio-economic and political transformations in Ukraine (end of XVIII - first decades of XX century). Book 1-2]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 6, 207-212. [in Ukrainian]
18. Volhonskyi, M. N. (2002). Natcionalnyi vopros v Rossiiskoj imperii i pravitelstvennye krugi. Ukaz 12 dekabrya 1904 g. [The national question in the Russian Empire and government circles. Decree 12 December 1904]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya, 3, 55-72. [in Russian] Zhurnal Volynskogo gubernskogo zemskogo sobraniya ХІ Chrezvychajnoj sessii. (1912). Zhurnal Volynskogo gubernskogo zemskogo sobraniya ХІ Chrezvychajnoj sessii. Zasedanie 20 noyabrya 1912 goda [Journal of the Volyn provincial zemstvo assembly of the XI Extraordinary session. Meeting November 20, 1912]. (pp. 2-3). Zhitomir: Jelektricheskaya tipografiya tovarishhestva "N.A. Brodovich". [in Russian]
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
Russia Empire in the XX century entered into a complex economic and political environment. Consequences of defeat of autocracy in war with Japan. Reasons of growing revolutionary motion in Grodno. Events of revolution of a 1905 year in Byelorussia.
реферат [9,4 K], добавлен 14.10.2009Features of the socio-political situation of the Kazakh people after the October Revolution of 1917. The creation of KazASSR in 1920, its internal structure of the state system, main stages of development and the economic and industrial achievements.
презентация [1,2 M], добавлен 01.03.2016The world political and economic situation on the beginning of the twentieth century. The formation of the alliances between the European states as one of the most important causes of World War One. Nationalism and it's place in the world conflict.
статья [12,6 K], добавлен 13.03.2014An analysis of the prosperity of the British economy in the 10th century. Features of the ascent to the throne of King Knut. Prerequisites for the formation of Anglo-Viking aristocracy. Description of the history of the end of the Anglo-Saxon England.
реферат [20,5 K], добавлен 26.12.2010The most important centers of the Belarusian national revival. Development of public libraries in Byelorussia. Value Hlebtsevicha as a great researcher of library science, his contribution to development of network of free libraries in Byelorussia.
статья [8,2 K], добавлен 14.10.2009What is capitalism, the main points of this system. A brief historical background to the emergence of capitalism. Types and models of the capitalism in the globalizing world. Basic information about globalization. Capitalism in the era of globalization.
реферат [20,3 K], добавлен 15.01.2011The clandestine tradition in Australian historiography. Russell Ward's Concise History of Australia. Abolishing the Catholics, Macintyre's selection of sources. Macintyre's historical method, abolishes Langism. Fundamental flaws in Macintyre's account.
реферат [170,7 K], добавлен 24.06.2010Aims, tasks, pre-conditions, participants of American war for independence. Basic commander-in-chiefs and leaders of this war. Historical chronology of military operations. Consequences and war results for the United States of America and Great Britain.
презентация [4,8 M], добавлен 16.02.2013Practical aspects of U.S. security policy from the point of view of their reflection in the "Grand strategy", as well as military-political and military-political doctrines. The hierarchy of strategic documents defining the policy of safety and defense.
статья [26,3 K], добавлен 19.09.2017Trade and industry of the England in the 16th century. Houses, its construction. Food in England in the 16-th century. Clothes for rich and poor people. Education in the country. A petty school. Oxford and Cambridge universities. The age of the marriage.
презентация [992,5 K], добавлен 28.04.2015Biographical information about the life of Soviet and Azerbaijani state, party and political figure Heydar Alirza oglu Aliyev. Becoming a political career and work as Russian President Vladimir Putin. Angela Dorothea Merkel is a German politician.
реферат [24,6 K], добавлен 20.10.2014Національні ідеї галицької молоді у 1900-1903 рр. Формування партійно-політичної системи у Східній Галичині та на Буковині. "Національний з'їзд" польських політичних сил 1903 р. Суспільна діяльність єврейських організацій на західноукраїнських землях.
курсовая работа [49,6 K], добавлен 06.07.2012The Historical Background of Cold War. The Historical Context. Causes and Interpretations. The Cold War Chronology. The War Years. The Truman Doctrine. The Marshall Plan. The Role of Cold War in American History and Diplomacy.
дипломная работа [53,5 K], добавлен 24.05.2003Учреждение, состав и принципы работы Российской Государственной Думы в начале XX века. Политический портрет Столыпина. Программа реформ П.А. Столыпина, изменение избирательного закона. Решение аграрного вопроса. Политический кризис в марте 1911 г.
курсовая работа [79,1 K], добавлен 16.02.2013Farmers and monument builders. The foundation of St. Andrew`s University. Mary the Queen of Scots. Political and cultural life after merger of Scotland and England. The Jacobite Rebellions. The main characteristics of Scotland in the modern era.
курсовая работа [69,4 K], добавлен 20.09.2013Studying the main aspects of historical development of the British Parliament, its role in the governing of the country in the course of history. The Anglo-Saxon Witenagemot. The functions of the British Parliament in the modern state management system.
курсовая работа [70,5 K], добавлен 06.03.2014Imperialism has helped countries to build better technology, increase trade, and has helped to build powerful militaries. During 19th century America played an important role in the development of military technologies. Militarism led to the World War I.
контрольная работа [20,2 K], добавлен 26.01.2012Theodore Roosevelt as the Twenty-Sixth President of the United States and passionate hunter, especially of big game. The original member of the American Institute of Arts and Letters. Electing him to the Assembly of New York State, governor of New York.
презентация [772,8 K], добавлен 12.11.2013Дослідження політичних, економічних та соціальних протиріч в управлінні Російською імперією у ХХ столітті. Причини спалаху страйків та бунтів серед робітничого класу. Ознайомлення із гаслами соціал-революціонерів. Наслідки економічної кризи 1900-1903 рр.
курсовая работа [49,6 K], добавлен 04.02.2011Рабочее и крестьянское движение в 1900-1903 гг. Начало пролетарского этапа освободительного движения. Переход к политическим стачкам и демонстрациям. Создание революционной марксистской партии в России. Возвращение В.И. Ленина из ссылки, программа партии.
реферат [31,9 K], добавлен 29.10.2009