Вплив ЄСПЛ на формування наднаціональної та національної парадигми прав людини (український контекст)

5. Bihun V'yacheslav. (2011). Filosofiya pravosuddya: ideya ta zdiysnennya [from Ukr.: Philosophy of justice: idea and history]. Kyyiv: Biblioteka Mizhnarodnoho chasopysu «Problemy filosofiy i prava».

6. Buromens'kyy M., Serdyuk O. (2018). Analitychnyy zvit za rezul'tatamy monitorynhu sudovykh rishen' shchodo zastosuvannya v Ukrayini polozhen' Konventsiyi pro zakhyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod ta praktyky Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny [from Ukr.: Analytical report on the results of monitoring court decisions on the application in Ukraine of the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights]. Kyyiv: Koordynator proektiv OBSYe v Ukrayini, Instytut prykladnykh humanitarnykh doslidzhen'.

7. Case of Vyerentsov v. Ukraine. (2013),

8. Case of Burmych and others v. Ukraine. (2017),

9. Donald Alice, Gordon Jane, Leach Philip. (2012). The UK and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights and Social Justice Research Institute. London: London Metropolitan University.

10. Denisova Lyudmyla (2020). Introduction to the annual report of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner For Human Rights on the observance and protection of the human rights and freedoms of citizens of Ukraine

11. Dufeniuk Oksana. (2019). Ryzyky nenalezhnoho zastosuvannya pravovykh pozytsiy Yevropeys' kohosudu z prav lyudyny ukrayins'koyu Femidoyu [from Ukr.: Risks of improper application of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights by the Ukrainian Themis] V Derzhavotvorennya ta pravotvorennya v kontekstiyevrointehratsiyi [from Ukr.: State-building and law-making in the context of European integration], Zabzalyuk, Dmytro, (red.). L'viv: BONA, 51-55.

12. Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. (2018). What is law for the European Court of Human Rights? Georgetown Journal of International Law 49: 89-134.

13. Egli, Patricia. (2008). Another Step in the Reformof the European Court of Human Rights: The Report of the Group of Wise Persons. Zaц RV68: 155-173.

14. Goncharenko, Olena. (2012) Pravova pryroda «pilotnykh rishen'» Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny [from Ukr.: Legal Nature of the «Pilot Judgments» of the European Court of Human Rights] Forum prava [from Ukr.: Forum of Law] 4: 243-249.

15. Havrylyuk, Oleksandr. (2018). Problemni pytannya zastosuvannya praktykyYevropeys'kohosudu z prav lyudyny natsional'nymy sudamy [from Ukr.: Problematic issues of application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights by national courts]. Pidpryyemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo [from Ukr.: Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law]. 4: 231-238

16. Horban', Volodymyr. (2019). Ukrayins'ke derzhavotvorennya ta pravotvorennya 2019: istorychna perspektyva z pohlyadu retrospektyvnoho dosvidu [from Ukr.: Ukrainian state-building and lawmaking 2019: a historical perspective from the point of retrospective experience] V Derzhavotvorennya ta pravotvorennya v konteksti yevrointehratsiyi [from Ukr.: State-building and lawmaking in the context of European integration], Zabzalyuk, Dmytro, (red.). L'viv: BONA, 51-55.

17. Helfer, Laurence, R. (2008) Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime. The European Journal of International Law 19(1): 125-159.

18. Joint Dissenting Opinion Of Judges Yudkivska, Sajo, Bianku, Karaka§, De Gaetano, laffranque And Motocin Case of Burmych and others v. Ukraine,

19. Khylyuk, Svitlana. (2015). «ZLochynikara» u Konventsiyi pro zakhyst prav lyudyny i osnovopo lozhnykh svobod [from Ukr.: „Crime and Punishment” in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. Chasopys Akademiyi advokatury Ukrayiny [from Ukr.: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine]. 8(4): 108-125.

20. Lishchyna, Ivan (2020). Shchorichnyy zvit pro rezul'taty diyal'nosti Upovnovazhenoho u spravakh Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny u 2019 rotsi [from Ukr.: Annual reporton the results of the activities of the Commissioner for the European Court of Human Rightsin 2019],

21. Luban, David. (2013). Human Rights Pragmatism and Human Dignity. In Philosophical Foundations of Hluman Rights. Oxford: Massimo Renzo, Rowan Cruft, & Matthew Liao, eds., Oxford University Press, 1-26.

22. Mikhaylina, Tetyana. (2018). Tsinnisnooriyentovanyy kontsept pravosvidomosti [from Ukr.: Value-oriented concept of Legal awareness]. Pidpryyemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo [from Ukr.: Entrepreneurship, Economy and law] 1: 119-123.

23. Mounk, Yascha. (2018). The People vs. Democracy. Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

24. Naolain Fionnua La. (2017). Transitional Justice and the European Convention on Human Rights. Academy briefing 10: 26.

25. Parkhomenko P. (2018). Deyaki osoblyvosti zastosuvannya praktyky Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny v natsional'nomu sudochynstvi: praktychnyy aspekt [from Ukr.: Some features of the application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in national proceedings: a practical aspect] V Praktyka Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny v diyal'nosti orhaniv prokuratury i sudu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy [from Ukr.: The case Law of the European Court of Human Rights in the activities of prosecutors and courts: challenges and prospects]. Kyyiv: Natsional'na akademiya prokuratury Ukrayiny, 140-144.

26. Ponad 12 tysyach ukrayintsiv ne otrymayut' kompensatsiyu vid Yevropeys'koho sudu [from Ukr.: More than 12,000 Ukrainians will not receive compensation from the European Court]

27. Rabinovych Petro, Radanovych Nataliya. (2002). Yevropeys'ka konventsiya z prav Lyudyny: problemy natsionaL'noyi impLementatsiyi (zahaL'noteoretychni aspekty) [from Ukr.: European Convention on Human Truth: Problems of NationaL ImpLementation (generaL theoreticaL aspects)]. L'viv: Astron.

28. Rabinovych Serhiy. (2008). Yevropeys'ka pryrodno-pravova dumka ta kryza tsinnisno-normatyvnoyi svidomosti [from Ukr.: European naturaL and Legal thought and the crisis of value and normative consciousness]. Aktual'ni problemy derzhavy i prava [from Ukr.: Current issues of state and Law] 40: 35-43.

29. Stepanova Snizhana. (2018). Yevropeys'ki standarty prava na spravedlyvyy sud ta yikh impLementatsiya u natsionaL'ne zakonodavstvo Ukrayiny: konstytutsiyno-pravove dosLidzhennya [from Ukr.: European standards for the right to a fair trial and their implementation in the national legislation of Ukraine: constitutional law research]: (Candidate's thesis), Uzhhorod.

30. Solyom Peter. (2019). Judicial activism - the Last refuge? How the European Court of Human Rights have addressed challenges of democracy and the Lack of the separation of powers

31. Tymchenko Hennadii, Demyanova Elena. (2014). Protsedura piLotnoyi postanovy Yevropeys'koho sudu z prav lyudyny v svitli optymizatsiyi protsesuaL'noyi formy diyaL'nosti sudovoyi vady from Ukr.

32. Procedure of the pilot resolution of the European Sourt of Human Rights in the Light of optimization of a procedural form of activity of judicial authority],

33. Vyrok Ukrayini: Yespl vidmovyvsya rozhlyadaty ponad 12 tysyach sprav vid ukrayintsiv [from Ukr.: Verdict against Ukraine: The ECtHR refused to hear more than 12,000 cases from Ukrainians],

34. Wildhaber Luzius. (2007). The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future. American University International Law Review 22(4): 521-538.

35. Zysset Alain. (2018). Right, Crime, and Court: Toward a Unifying Political Conception of International Law. Crim Law and Philos 12: 677-693.

Размещено на Allbest.ru