Integration perspectives for improving regional policy in rural areas of Bulgaria

Determining the degree of implementation of a specific regional policy in rural areas in the context of Bulgaria's integration in the European Union. Prospects for changes in the economic situation and new trends in the implementation of regional policy.

Рубрика Международные отношения и мировая экономика
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 16.06.2024
Размер файла 1,2 M

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Bulgaria, as a part of the European Union, needs to bring out those features of the regional policy that can activate the implementation of active policies for regional development, and from there for the structuring of sustainable regional communities, generating a stable and sustainable regional development model.

On the other hand, in the European Union, efforts are focused exclusively on policy areas that have the greatest impact on the effectiveness of regional development policy or the process of convergence between member states. The EU cohesion policy should be able to respond more effectively to the needs and characteristics of the territories, and the specific geographical challenges and opportunities of the regions and cities. In a Pan-European context, the choice of a specific policy objective means fewer specific objectives and simplicity in the use of indicators. Therefore, within the framework of the European Union, it is necessary to strengthen regional policy through the implementation of more territorial instruments (Dmytriieva & Sviatets, 2023). Another important document promoting the implementation of regional policy is the Leipzig Charter for Sustainable European Cities, which complements the ideas expressed in the Territorial Program, as it turns the integrated urban development policy into a task with a European dimension. In this way, the integrated urban development policy and the territorial cohesion policy each make a complementary contribution to the implementation of the goal of sustainable development. It is important to note that the regional policy in Bulgaria must be based on the principle of “housing-transport-work”. This is, in practice, an expression of the vision for conducting a regional policy based on the interrelationship “population-space- economy” and sets its expression for the need for a policy for regional development. In other words, the population and the economy are the two poles between which the regional policy takes place, which is visible through the spatial change. In regional development, a significant factor is the interaction “demography - economy - space”, which characterises the effectiveness of regional policy and opportunities for the development of the Bulgarian territory.

An important contribution is made by the functioning of the European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON), which periodically makes a more in-depth analysis of the impact of Community policies on territorial cohesion and causality. This process requires the development of operational indicators to regularly monitor the territorial dimension. Territorial cohesion can only be achieved with an intensive and continuous dialogue between all stakeholders in territorial development. We call this collaborative process “territorial governance”. The private sector (and especially entrepreneurs at local and regional levels), the scientific community, public administration (especially local and regional authorities), non-governmental organisations, and different sectoral policies must act together to better exploit key investments in European regions, as well as to reduce the consequences of climate change. In this direction, we must emphasise that in the rural areas of Bulgaria, there are territories with a unique character and unused potential for the development of tourism, combining natural and cultural values, offering a recreational environment corresponding to modern requirements in terms of accessibility, bioclimatic comfort, and communication connectivity. There are over 40,000 registered immovable cultural heritage monuments in the country. At the same time, rural areas can strengthen their regional profile through the attraction of investments and the rational use of program instruments and ways of grant funding, which will create opportunities to support the regional development of rural areas.

Another important deficit that has not yet been resolved is support for the strengthening and expansion of the trans-European networks passing through Bulgaria. In practice, mobility and accessibility are essential preconditions for economic development in all regions. We need rail, road, and air networks of sufficient capacity (including a network of operational regional airports), efficient sea, coastal, and inland waterways, and a network of secondary roads (connecting urban centres to their hinterlands), as well as effective transport management of loads. Bulgaria must improve the development and modernisation of railway transport and, the development of the airports at Ruse, Silistra, Targovishte, Kardjali, Gotse Delchev, Gabrovnitsa, and Vidin. It is important to design expressways in the direction Silistra-Shumen-Yambol- Elhovo, Lovech-Troyan-Karnare-Karlovo-Plovdiv, Gorna Malina-Pirdop-Karlovo- Kazanlak-Sliven-Aitos-Karnobat-V etren, Montana-Pleven-Svishtov, Pleven-Byala-Razgrad-Shoumen, Kubrat-Isperih-Dulovo-Tervel-Dobrich-Kardam.

In practice, the particularities and differences in the potential of the regions, which can be the basis for conducting an effective regional policy on the environment and culture, are ignored. This could be a particularly strong development prospect for the regions within the Danube Plain, Pre-Balkan, Dobrudja, Trans-Balkan Lowlands, Rhodope, Strandja, and Sakar. Therefore, through coordinated management measures and appropriate infrastructural development, “cultural roads and networks” should be stimulated, as well as any other territorial projects of importance for the natural and cultural heritage.

From a theoretical point of view, the main conclusion is that for the national economy to function effectively, it is necessary to improve the well-being of rural areas and create an opportunity to improve regional connectivity. Rural areas need a strong regional economy and proper programming to achieve their sustainable regional development goals. The promotion of entrepreneurship in rural areas should be brought up as a government policy.

Conclusions

This study determined the degree of implementation of specific regional policies in rural areas in the context of Bulgaria's integration into the European Union due to the prospects of changes in economic situation and new trends in the implementation of regional policies. The population decline in rural areas during 2007-2022 was twice as high as the average rate of population decline in Bulgaria. Analysis of the age structure of Bulgarian farmers indicates that the largest relative share (32%) is between the ages of 51 and 60; only 6% are aged 21 to 30, and 12% are aged 31 to 40. This is due to the unattractiveness of agricultural work, its low prestige and efficiency, as well as high risk. Also, in Bulgaria, few graduates of secondary special and higher agricultural education return to the countryside for the development of agribusiness. For example, among the interviewed farmers, only 12.9% have completed a special agricultural education, and 9.7% have a higher education. The potential of agribusiness has a significant impact not only on its development, but also on the rural areas in which it is located. However, there is noticeable stagnation of development in rural areas, as evidenced by the results of surveys on the development opportunities of local economic entities: only 3.2% of farmers answered as “very good”, and others 3.2% as “good”, while “satisfactory” - 45.2%, and “unsatisfactory” - 48.4%.

In practice, Bulgaria's regional policy in recent years has had a satisfactory systematic character. The process of strategic and planning activity is developing, which has its characteristics at different levels, but a mechanism of sufficiently sustainable synchrony and coherence between them has not yet been found. Planning regions are formed based on regions depending on their geographical location, economic development, population, and development prospects, but they do not have their institutional forms, and hence the possibilities for conducting regional policy at the meso-level. To a large extent, public administration perceives regional policy as a means of imposing the centralised model at the local level based on regulatory regimes and a centralized budget, rather than the implementation of regional development policies imposing institutional stereotypes creating conditions for decentralisation of management, as well as successful models of the socio-economic development of the regions. The need to introduce regional policy requires that individual approaches in its implementation represent a certain set of practices for solving a given local or regional socio-economic problem or the adaptation of the region to the pace of developed regions. More and more in Bulgaria, it is necessary to implement a specific socio-economic policy in the individual regions, which is aimed at the development of an efficient and competitive economy and full integration into the European structures. Regional development in Bulgaria is at an important stage, in which it is necessary to form the regional profiles of the districts in our country. This brings to the fore the effectiveness of the implemented policy for regional development. The main challenge now is to find the balance between the priorities of individual municipalities, districts, and planning regions, as well as solving the most important problems for them. To a large extent, the development of Bulgarian regions and districts must correspond with the national priorities and understandings for the development of the regions and the policy of the European Commission for the territorial development of the European Union as a whole. Efforts to implement the regional policy is related to finding the opportunities for purposeful impact on the territory using tools and activities that should bring regional development to the fore as a national priority of the modern state. In practice, regional development means a balance between the priorities of municipalities, regions, and planning regions and the search for the most important problems for them to solve related to national priorities and understandings of the development of regions as separate territorial communities. In practice, creating conditions for balanced development of the individual regions of the country and supporting territorial bodies and activities through financial, credit, and investment policy means that regional development must be the foundation of the regional economy and outline its contours through effective regional development policies.

Limitations and future research. The main limitation of this study is that in this article the authors focused mainly on a qualitative analysis of trends, problems and prospects for the development of regional policy in rural areas in Bulgaria. A limitation of the data is that in this study we considered a limited number of indicators based on their availability in National Statistical Institute reports, which likely did not take into account other important indicators of agricultural and rural development. On the other hand, this study is limited to only examining the current state and does not explore the causal mechanism between the key parameters of the regional policy for the development of rural areas and does not make predictions about the efficiency of this policy in the long term.

Future research should be directed toward a deeper analysis of the relationship between the level of development of rural areas and agricultural business, as well as scenario forecasting of agricultural and rural development in Bulgaria. In this aspect, the development of a set of measures to stimulate the retention of young people in the village, in particular through the introduction of tax and other financial benefits for new investments in agricultural and rural development, is of great importance. The introduction of new approaches to the implementation of the regional policy for the development of rural areas in Bulgaria necessitates the improvement and modernisation of the conceptual apparatus, methodology and practice of strategic planning. It is also possible to refine the system of indicators for evaluating the regional development policy with other policies in the country.

References

1. Beer, A., Haughton, G., & Maude, A. (2003). Developing locally: an international comparison of local and regional economic development. Bristol, Policy Press.

2. Blakely, E.J., & Bradshaw, T.K. (2002). Planning local economic development: theory and practice. London, Sage Publications.

3. Boyadzhiev, V. (1995). On the meaning and content of some basic categories of theoretical geographical knowledge. Yearbook of the University of St. Kliment Ohridski GGF, 2(87), 43-52.

4. Boyadzhiev, V. (2011). The role of small settlements for the regional development of Bulgaria. Report in the collection “Opportunities and problems for the development of alternative forms of tourism in small settlements”. Plovdiv, Academic Publishing House at the Center for European Integration and Culture of the University of Higher Education.

5. Boyadzhiev, V. (2005). Region, regionalism, regional policy in the European Union. Sofia, Sofia University.

6. Hayes, В. (2014). Infrastructure: a guide to the industrial landscape. New York, WW Norton & Co. Publication.

7. Brink, A. (2004). Land consolidation and the emergence of the metropolitan

landscape.

8. Casati, R., & Varzi, A.C. (1999). Parts and places: the structures of spatial representation. Cambridge, MIT Press.

9. Chen, Y., Gibb, K., Leishman, C., & Wright, R. (2012). The impact of population aging on house prices: a micro-simulation approach. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 523-542.

10. Dimov, N. (2008). Regional sustainable development of Bulgaria: advantages, limitations and synergetic effect. In European integration and sustainable development (pp. 173-189). Sofia, Publishing House “Iztok-Zapad”.

11. Dmytriieva, V., & Sviatets, Yu. (2023). Agricultural business in independent Ukraine: thirty-year dynamics of the reorganization process. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(2), 136-162.

12. Geneshki, M. (2000). Regional economics, 3rd ed. Sofia, Publisher Trakia-M.

13. Georgiev, L. (2008). Regional economics. Sofia, New Bulgarian University.

14. Geshev, G. (1999). Problems of regional development and regional policy in the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia, Institute of Geography of BAS; YuZU “N. Rilski”.

15. Glaeser, E.L., & Redlick, C. (2009). Social capital and urban growth. International Regional Science Review, 32(3), 264-299.

16. Hristoskov, J. (2015). Nature, classifications and statistical analysis of the infrastructure of the territory. Statistics, 4, 29-66.

17. Ives, B., Olson, M.H., & Baroudi, J.J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26, 785-793.

18. Khirivskyi, R., Cherevko, H., Yatsiv, I., Pasichnyk, T., Petryshyn, L., &

Kucher, L. (2020). Assessment and analysis of sustainability of the socio-economic development of amalgamated territorial communities of the region. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(2), 569-578.

19. Khirivskyi, R., Yatsiv, I., Petryshyn, L., Pasichnyk, T., Kucher, L., &

Irtyshcheva, I. (2022). Assessment of the efficiency of employment of the communities' resource potential using different approaches. TEM Journal, 11(1), 367373.

20. Kolev, B. (1997). Geographical space - a resource of the future. Geographical space - an investment for the XXI century. Sofia, Institute of Geography of BAS.

21. Koteva, N., Mladenova, M., Risina, M., & Bashev, H. (2008). Problems and prospects for the development of agricultural holdings under the conditions of the EU CAP. Economics and management of agriculture, 53(3), 17-25.

22. Lee, Y.W., Strong, D.M., Kahn, B.K., & Wang, R.Y. (2002). AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40(2), 133-146.

23. Mishev, P., Ivanova, N., Shterev, N., & Harizanova, H. (2009). Status and prospects for the development of semi-market farms in Bulgaria. Nauchni trudove, 2, 3-60.

24. Mytelka, L., & Goertzen, H. (2004). Learning, innovation and cluster growth: a study of two inherited organizations in the Niagara Peninsula wine cluster. Discussion Paper Series 2004-15, Maastricht, Netherlands.

25. Osmani, M., Kolaj, R., Borisov, P., & Arabska, E. (2022). Why agricultural policies fail and two cases of policy failures in Albania. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(2), 86-104.

26. Osypova, O., Horna, M., Vashchaiev, S., Ishchuk, Y., & Pomazun, O. (2023).

Convergence of food consumption across Ukrainian regions: approach using spatial panel data models. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(1), 28-43.

27. Patyka, N., Gryschenko, O., Kucher, A., Heldak, M., & Raszka, B. (2021). Assessment of the degree of factors impact on employment in Ukraine's agriculture. Sustainability, 13(2), 564.

28. Penkova, E., & Gorchilova, D. (2013). Social development of the regions. Sofia, Publishing complex UNSS.

29. Ramon, J. (1994). Some logics related to von Wright's logic of place. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35(1), 88-98.

30. Saglam Qelikoz, Y., Yildiz, T., Arslan, U., & Kirmizioglu, H. (2022). The relationship between economic globalization and ecological footprint: empirical evidence for developed and developing countries. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(4), 109-133.

31. Siryk, Z., Popadynets, N., Pityulych, M., Chakii, O., Irtyshcheva, I., Panukhnyk, O., Hyk, V., ... & Lysyak, N. (2021). Decentralization of local selfgovernment under the conditions of administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine. Accounting, 7(4), 781-790.

32. Soares, R.R. (2004). Crime reporting as a measure of institutional development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(4), 851-871.

33. Trono, A., & Castronuovo, V. (2016). Cultural landscape and sustainable tourism in rural areas. Case studies from the Puglia region in Southern Italy. Budapest International Conference on Tourism and Cultural Landscapes: Towards A Sustainable Approach (pp. 571-586). Budapest.

34. Tsonkov, N. (2022). Regulatory models for territorial development. Publishing House of UNWE.

35. Valkov, V. (2018). The role of authorities at central and local level for social policy. Nauchni trudove, 4, 269-280.

36. Varga, A. (2021). Local self-governments and the vertical division of power. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 6(2), 121-132.

37. Vaughan, L., & Wu, G. (2004). Links to commercial websites as a source of business information. Scientometrics, 60(3), 487-496.

38. von Wright, G.H. (1983). Practical reason. Oxford, Blackwell.

39. Wilder, R. (2007). Integrative Land Consolidation - an approach for fulfilling the objectives of the rural development policy. Report on the workshop on effective and sustainable land management: a permanent challenge for each society. Geneva.

40. Yang, C.C. (2005). The refined Kano's model and its application. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16, 1127-1137.

Размещено на Allbest.Ru

...

Подобные документы

  • A peaceful Europe (1945-1959): The R. Schuman declaration, attempts of Britain, government of M. Thatcher and T. Blair, the Treaty of Maastricht, social chapter, the treaty of Nice and Accession. European economic integration. Common agricultural policy.

    курсовая работа [47,4 K], добавлен 09.04.2011

  • The study of the history of the development of Russian foreign policy doctrine, and its heritage and miscalculations. Analysis of the achievements of Russia in the field of international relations. Russia's strategic interests in Georgia and the Caucasus.

    курсовая работа [74,6 K], добавлен 11.06.2012

  • A monetary union is a situation where сountries have agreed to share a single currency amongst themselves. First ideas of an economic and monetary union in Europe. Value, history and stages of economic and money union of Europe. Criticisms of the EMU.

    реферат [20,8 K], добавлен 06.03.2010

  • Content of the confrontation between the leading centers of global influence - the EU, the USA and the Russian Federation. Russia's military presence in Syria. Expansion of the strategic influence of the Russian Federation. Settlement of regional crises.

    статья [34,8 K], добавлен 19.09.2017

  • Integration, globalization and economic openness - basical principles in attraction of capital inflows. Macroeconomic considerations. Private investment. Problems of official investment and managing foreign assets liabilities. Positive benefits from capit

    курсовая работа [52,4 K], добавлен 25.02.2002

  • Forum for 21 Pacific Rim countries that seeks to promote free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. History of establishment Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), speciality of membership, scope of work and structure.

    реферат [366,7 K], добавлен 16.01.2012

  • The Soviet-Indian relationship from the Khrushchev period to 1991 was. The visit by Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru to the Soviet Union in June 1955 and Khrushchev's return trip to India in the fall of 1955. Economic and military assistance.

    аттестационная работа [23,4 K], добавлен 22.01.2014

  • Characteristic of growth and development of Brazil and Russian Federation. Dynamics of growth and development. Gross value added by economic activity. Brazilian export of primary and manufactured goods. Export structure. Consumption side of GDP structure.

    реферат [778,3 K], добавлен 20.09.2012

  • Russian Federation Political and Economic relations. Justice and home affairs. German-Russian strategic partnership. The role of economy in bilateral relations. Regular meetings make for progress in cooperation: Visa facilitations, Trade relations.

    реферат [26,3 K], добавлен 24.01.2013

  • Review the history of signing the treaty of Westphalia. Analysis of creating a system of European states with defined borders and political balance. Introduction to the concept of a peaceful community. Languages and symbols of the League of Nations.

    презентация [506,1 K], добавлен 13.04.2015

  • Enhancing inter-ethnic conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh in 1989, and its result - forcing the Soviet Union to grant Azerbaijani authorities greater leeway. Meeting of world leaders in 2009 for a peaceful settlement on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    презентация [730,7 K], добавлен 29.04.2011

  • Presence of nominal rigidity as an important part of macroeconomic theory since. Definition of debt rigidity; its impact on crediting. The causes of the Japanese economic crisis; way out of it. Banking problems in United States and euro area countries.

    статья [87,9 K], добавлен 02.09.2014

  • Сутність макроекономічного поняття "економічне зростання". Його фактори – природні та трудові ресурси, капітал і технології. Загальний аналіз і схема макроекономічної моделі зростання (неокласична модель росту Р. Солоу, економічна модель Харода-Домара).

    дипломная работа [59,6 K], добавлен 31.08.2009

  • One of determinant national foreign policy priorities is European and Euroatlantic integration. Relationship between Ukraine and NATO was established in 1991, when Ukraine proclaimed sovereignty right after the fall of the USSR and joined the Council.

    статья [32,6 K], добавлен 29.12.2009

  • Antitrust regulation of monopolies. The formation and methods of antitrust policy in Russia. Several key areas of antitrust policy: stimulating entrepreneurship, the development of competition began, organizational and legal support for antitrust policy.

    эссе [39,2 K], добавлен 04.06.2012

  • Investments as an economic category, and their role in the development of macro- and microeconomics. Classification of investments and their structure. Investment activity and policy in Kazakhstan: trends and priorities. Foreign investment by industry.

    курсовая работа [38,8 K], добавлен 05.05.2014

  • The central elements of the original Community method. A new "intergovernmentalist" school of integration theory emerged, liberal intergovernmentalism. Constructivism, and reshaping European identities and preferences and integration theory today.

    практическая работа [29,4 K], добавлен 20.03.2010

  • Brief description of PJSC "Kyivenergo". Basic concepts of dividend policy of the company. Practice of forming and assesing the effiiency of dividend policy of the company. The usual scheme of dividend policy formation consists of six main stages.

    курсовая работа [1004,4 K], добавлен 07.04.2015

  • Models and concepts of stabilization policy aimed at reducing the severity of economic fluctuations in the short run. Phases of the business cycle. The main function of the stabilization policy. Deviation in the system of long-term market equilibrium.

    статья [883,7 K], добавлен 19.09.2017

  • The global financial and economic crisis. Monetary and financial policy, undertaken UK during a crisis. Combination of aggressive expansionist monetary policy and decretive financial stimulus. Bank repeated capitalization. Support of domestic consumption.

    реферат [108,9 K], добавлен 29.06.2011

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.