Improving the financial mechanism of state support for innovative activity of business entities under market economy

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL MECHANISM OF STATE SUPPORT FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES UNDER MARKET ECONOMY

Problem statement. The system of public finance is an important part and an effective tool of contemporary economic policy. Effectiveness of this system largely determines the impact on the economy in general and an innovation activity in par ticular.

The state should build its economic policies to ensure the optimum redistribu tion of financial resources for the accelerated growth of production as well as quality of life.

To provide this it is required to determine the level of state intervention in eco nomic activity of entities and the state's obligation of welfare of its citizens. This approach defines the percentage of the gross national product that needs to be con centrated in financial institutions created by the state.

Recent research and publications analysis. An important contribution to the study concerning the formation and distribution of public finances and the state's role in fostering innovation was made by such scholars as M. Denysenko (2013),

The Lviv Regional Institute of Public Administration National Academy of Public Administration, the Office of the President of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine. P. Drucker (1985), C. Edquist and L. Hommen (2011), C. Edquist et el. (2009), J. Karakay (2009), B. Santo (1990), O. Vasylyk (2004), O. Vasylyk and K. Pavluk (2004) and others.

Unresolved issues. Today, however, other issues arise that require detailed study. This primarily relates to the problems of public finances, improving mechanisms and tools of innovative processes, determining their impact on the regulation of innova tion actors in the economy.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the role and the functions of public finance in enhancing the innovative activities under transit economy.

Key research findings. An important element in transformational economy is the financial system. In this structure limited public financial resources play an important role. The financial system can have a structure that reflects not only the complexity of its organizational method (parallel operation of financial institutions, implemen tation of market mechanisms etc.), but also a set of caveats and limitations arising from the transformational system itself. Effectiveness of its functioning is affected not only by internal but also by external environment.

Due to the financial system distribution of gross domestic product (GDP), accu mulation of financial resources for sustainable economic development is carried out.

In transformational economy financial system is an important and effective ele ment of institutional infrastructure. In other words, financial resources act as a com ponent of economic potential. They comprise all available material resources in the state -- its revenues, expenses and debts.

All levels of economic activity are necessary, but the last -- national one is of par ticular importance due to function of the state in all economic activities. One of the key functions of the state in transformational economy is the organization of efficient production aimed at improving socioeconomic development. This applies to the sphere of economic activity that requires integrated and effective incentives, regula tion and control, taking into account the interests of all economic actors: entrepre neurs and their associations, consumers, employees, local communities, states etc., and the international community (international economic and financial organiza tions etc.). Only public institutions are able to provide comprehensive and balanced fulfillment of their economic interests, including the use of financial and economic instruments and mechanisms.

Sustainable economic development of the country largely depends on effective functioning of national financial institutions, which activities, in particular, should create conditions for the promotion of innovative business in the country.

The analysis shows that effective functioning of economic systems in developed countries is determined by the extent of innovative processes, which play the role of locomotive for sustainable economic development. Enhancing innovation in these economies is a crucial factor in their transition from the industrial age to a qualita tively new -- innovative one. It should be noted that at present for developed countries the main driver of growth is not sustainable financial capital and means of produc tion, but knowledge and new ideas that provide intellectual output, competitive and quality products for which consumers are willing to pay a high price. It is the innova tive nature of the economy that provides boosted socioeconomic development and high standards of living. The world experience shows that innovative activity is the main basis for modernization and transformation of the economic system. Under knowledge economy nontraditional industries dominate (where almost all extensive and intensive development factors are exhausted), and a whole new industry is based primarily on the use of new technologies. The introduction of new technologies in industrial production allows a qualitative breakthrough of the national economy into the world markets for goods and services, and the development of high-tech complex stimulates the growth of national economy and creates demand for new and innova tive technologies in other industries.

Thus, an important direction of economic policy under transitional system in order to accelerate the socioeconomic development is an effective innovation policy. The strategy of innovative development in economically developed countries of the world can be shaped in different ways.

For example, in the US the vast majority of scientific research and experimental development is funded by NGOs (non-governmental organizations) through grants and contracts, which form the basis of innovative processes in the country. Germany in the organization of its innovative process has used the US experience, namely the development of business incubators and science parks (along with the experience of France, the UK and Japan) (Edquist and Hommen, 2011). However, in the late XXth century this country put emphasis on the creation of regional innovation funds, which allowed boosting innovative activity at small and medium-sized enterprises. Japan and the newly industrialized countries of South East Asia in the field of innovations directed their resources on buying promising high-tech innovations and research developments in other countries at the stage of pre-production or laboratory devel opment (Edquist and Hommen, 2011). In this case, the domestic producers could only arrange the final revision of innovation and run production with further imple mentation of a new product at a market.

The Art. 10 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine declares the main directions of economic policy that directly shape financial and economic mechanisms of innova tive activity of economic agents (Commercial Code of Ukraine, 2003): formation of efficient financial and economic arrangements made within structural and sectoral, investment, depreciation, pricing, budgetary, fiscal, monetary, exchange rate, antitrust and competition policies as well as institutional reforms.

Development of these public finances areas would ensure the optimal balance between the interests of the state and taxpayers (businesses and citizens) in the process of formation and use of various capital funds, which take the form of financial resources of the state. Therefore, as noted by A. Vasylyk (2004) "now finances should be regarded as an economic category that reflects the creation, distribution and use of funds of financial resources to meet the needs of economic activity, providing a vari ety of services to the population of the state, providing implementation of state func tions. Ultimately, the purpose of the financial system is to achieve a high level of well being for both the state and the individual".

This means that public finances perform a certain number of functions that cor respond to the economic model of society, according to its development. However, for the disclosure of internal content of public finance as a socioeconomic category two traditional functions are enough: distribution and control. The first function always reflects the processes of creation, distribution and redistribution of GDP and its transformation into financial resources at every historical stage of economic deve lopment of the society and all economic, social and political changes that need pro per funding. The second function is natural for any type of economic system, as financial resources are always limited in the state and require proper control over their distribution and use.

Increasing the number of public finance's features, in our opinion, makes it impossible to fully reveal the qualitative characteristics of finance. For this reason it can be divided into 5 functions of public finance (ensuring expanded reproduction, formation of public consumption funds, maintenance costs of public administration, defense, a national insurance fund). Thus, the functions of finance could hardly be separated from the results achieved in functioning.

Based on the purpose of the study we focus on the first tool of public finance, namely, the provision of expanded reproduction.

One of the effective ways of this function realization as international practice shows is the introduction of an innovative development model for the national eco nomic system (Edquist et al., 2009). This innovative development model of national economy should be based on the existing innovative potential of the country and innovative potential of businesses, as well as entrepreneurial capacity for production innovation.

In today's economic studies there are numerous approaches to defining the innovation potential at the macrolevel. Based on the purpose of our study, innovative capacity should be considered as a number of economic resources available in a socioeconomic system for its development at any time. These resources are shared among the 3 main macrosectors: scientific-technical, educational and financial and are considered as a part of scientific and technical potential, educational potential and investment potential accordingly. This approach allows considering innovative potential not as all economic resources held by the society, but only that part of resources which can be used at the present level of socioeconomic development, in order to increase production and improve the quality of final product consumption. This methodological approach can adequately reflect not only a particular situation, certain relations in a economic system, but also the laws of their development, and, therefore, assess the effectiveness of the economic system functioning as a whole. Exploring the issues of innovation at the macrolevel due to the need for creation of a qualitatively new economy in Ukraine -- an economy focused on innovation. The costs of innovative process in the national economy and its efficiency are shown in Figure 1.

As we can see from Figure 1, 1 UAH spent on an innovation product consistent ly brings on average 3 UAH of innovative products sales. This indicates that innova tion funding has a large coefficient of efficiency, and its development has income potential. finance market economy innovative

It should be noted that this analysis is based on the macroeconomic approach, but it is necessary to consider the microeconomic approach that is an innovative potential of a single economic entity. Note that the material basis for innovation capacity of enterprises in today's conditions comprises not natural and industrial resources but ideas and innovations based on them. In this case, the innovation potential of a company is to be understood as the ability for more efficient imple mentation of a particular functional task while maximizing the use of available eco nomic resources. In other words, a combination of different types of resources the company needed to implement innovation. Innovative activity of domestic enterpris es is characterized in Table 1.

Figure 1. The costs of innovative process in the national economy of Ukraine

Table 1. Innovative activity of domestic enterprises

In contemporary economic publications of foreign and local researchers the fea tures of state financial incentives for innovative activities are highlighted (Drucker, 1985). Particular attention is paid to the implementation and operation of the mecha nisms of innovations financing.

The basic mechanisms available in the state are public investment, tax regula tions, preferential budget programs, price control, subsidies etc.

Financial mechanisms also include:

- system of financial planning and execution of plans (program priority areas of innovation implementation, development, project selection and financial security plans, programs and projects etc.);

- financial control systems for innovative activities (inspection, supervision, monitoring, evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency, sanctions etc.), system of incentives for innovation (innovative government programs, tax incentives, subsidized loans etc.);

- risk insurance for innovative activities (creation of guarantee funds, risk-shar ing on public-private partnerships etc.).

Finance subjects of innovative activities are a part of the financial system, which is associated not only with distribution and redistribution processes, but with the for mation of GDP in social production sphere as an object of distribution. This feature is evident in the differences of financial relationships system from that one that oper ates at the macro- and mesolevel.

The microlevel or the level of the market economy system of financial relation ships (for subjects of innovative activity) is shown in Figure 2. These relationships arise from:

- providing public and private, state (municipal) entities that perform financial and economic activities with registered capital;

- formation and distribution of income: gross and net income, profit from ordi nary activities, paying taxes and other fees and removal of part of the net income in the budgets of all levels;

- contributions to public funds;

- budget funding and obtaining loans and grants and so on.

Figure 2. The system of financial relationships between innovative activity subjects, designed by the author

Also, it is the relationships with other entities and financial institutions to invest in securities and revenues from financial investments and corporate rights, relations with credit institutions and insurance companies.

Conclusion

Under transformational economy the efficiency rate of financing innovations is often high, so the need for further improvement of the financial mechanism of state support for innovation activity under market economy at the macrolevel should be a priority for the economic development of Ukraine. Also, financing subjects of innovative activity is a part of the financial system, which is asso ciated not only with distribution and redistribution processes, but with the creation of GDP in social production sphere as an object of distribution. This feature is evident in the differences of financial relationships system from the one which operates at the macro- and mesolevels.

References

1. Господарський кодекс України від 16.01.2003 №436-IV // zakon.rada.gov.ua.

2. Василик О.Д. Теорія фінансів. -- К.: Основи, 2004. -- 426 с.

3. Василик О.Д., Павлюк К.В. Державні фінанси України: Підручник. -- К.: Центр навчальної літератури, 2004. -- 608 с.

4. Каракай Ю.В. Державне регулювання інноваційного розвитку // Економічний вісник НТУУ «КПІ»: Збірник наук. праць.- 2009.- №6. - С. 91-96.

5. Санто Б. Инновация как средство экономического развития / Пер. с венг.; Общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Б.В. Сазонова. - М.: Прогресс, 1990. - 295 с.

6. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row. 288 p.

7. Edquist, C, Hommen, L. (2011). Comparing National Systems of Innovation in Asia and Europe: Theory and Comparative Framework. In: Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalisation, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe. Edquist, C., Hommen, L. (eds.). Edward Elgar. Published in Chinese by Science Press (Beijing). 27 p.

8. Edquist, C, Luukkonen, T, Sotarauta, M. (2009). Broad-Based Innovation Policy, sub-report. In: Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System (pp. 11-69). Full Report, Helsinki, October 28, 2009.

Annotation

The article considers the key functions ofpublic finance and its role in the economic activity of business entities under market economy. The ways to improve the financial mechanism in enhancing the innovation activity are proposed by the author.

Keywords: budget; public finance; financial policy; innovation activities.

У статті розглянуто основні функції державних фінансів у ринковій економіці. Визначено роль державних фінансів в господарській діяльності суб'єктів економіки. Запропоновано шляхи покращення фінансового механізму активізації інноваційної діяльно сті підприємств.

Ключові слова: бюджет; державні фінанси; фінансова політика; інноваційна діяльність. Рис. 2. Табл. 1. Літ. 10.

В статье рассмотрены основные функции государственных финансов в рыночной экономике. Определена роль государственных финансов в хозяйственной деятельности субъектов экономики. Предложены пути улучшения финансового механизма активизации инновационной деятельности предприятий.

Ключевые слова: бюджет; государственные финансы; финансовая политика; инновацион ная деятельность.

Размещено на Allbest.ru