Disagreement and (im)politenessin a Spanish family members' WhatsApp group

Expression of disagreement and impoliteness in the course of communication between members of a Spanish family on WhatsApp. Multimodal analysis of understanding the communicative intentions of communication participants using the interview method.

Рубрика Иностранные языки и языкознание
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 10.03.2021
Размер файла 182,1 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

8. Baron, Naomi S. (2008).Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.

9. Bernal, Maria (2007).Categorization sociopragmвtica de la cortesiay de la descortesia: Unestudio de la conversation coloquialespanola.Estocolmo: Stockholm University.

10. Bou-Franch, Patricia, NuriaLorenzo-Dus &PilarGarcйs-ConejosBlitvich (2012). Social Interaction in Youtubetext-basedpolylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (4), 501--521.

11. Bouhnik, Dan &Deshen, Mor (2014). WhatsAppgoes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217--231. doi: 10.28945/2051.

12. Bourlai, Elli & Susan C. Herring (2014). Multimodal communication on Tumblr: `I have so many feels!' Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science.Bloomington, Indiana, 171--175.doi: 10.1145/2615569.2615697.

13. Bravo, Diana (2008). Situacionde habla, recursoscomunicativosy factoreslingmsticosen la interpretation de objetivosde cort^a. Cortesiay conversation: de lo escritoa lo oral. Valencia: Universitatde Valиncia, 12--24.

14. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

15. CaleroVaquera, Maria Luisa (2014). El discursodelWhatsApp: entre el Messenger y el SMS. Oralia, 17, 85--114.

16. Church, Karen & Rodrigo De Oliveira (2013). What's up with Whatsapp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 352--361.

17. Crystal, David (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Culpeper, Jonathan (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349--367.

19. Dresner, Eli & Susan C. Herring (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20 (3), 249--268.doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x.

20. Dresner, Eli & Susan C. Herring (2013). Emoticons and illocutionary force. In Riesenfeld, D. & G. Sca- rafil (eds.) Perspectives on theory of controversies and the ethics of communication. Dordrecht: Springer, 81--90.

21. Dynel, Marta (2015). The landscape of impoliteness research.Journal of Politeness Research, 11 (2), 329--340.doi: 10.1515/pr-2015-0013.

22. Edstrom, Anne (2004). Expressions of disagreement by Venezuelans in conversation: Reconsidering the influence of culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (8), 1499--1518.doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.002.

23. Ersoz, Selva (2019). Understanding Whatsapp parent groups' dynamics: Group communication and information sharing. ManasSosyalAraytirmalarDergisi, 8 (1), 1167--1183.

24. Fernandez-Amaya, Luda (2019). Managing conflict originated by feminism: A case study from WhatsApp interaction among Spanish family members. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. http://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00032.fer

25. Fernandez-Amaya, Luda, Hernandez-Lopez, Maria de la O &PilarGarcйs-ConejosBlitvich (2014).Spanish travellers' expectations of service encounters in domestic and international settings.Tourism, Culture and Communication, 14 (2), 117--134.

26. Flores-Salgado, Elizabeth & Teresa A. Castineira-Benitez (2018).The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move `requests'.Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 79--92.

27. FundacionTelefonica. 2018. “Informe de la sociedad digital en Espana,” https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/ arte_cultura/ sociedad-de-la-informacion/ sdie-2018/.

28. Ganasegeran, Kurubaran, PukunanRenganathan, Abdul Rashid & Sami A.R. Al-Dubai (2017). The m-Health revolution: Exploring perceived benefits of WhatsApp use in clinical practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 97, 145--151.doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.013.

29. Garcйs-ConejosBlitvich, Pilar (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.International Review of Pragmatics, 2, 46--94.

30. Garda-Gomez, Antonio (2018). Managing conflict on WhatsApp: A contrastive study of British and Spanish family disputes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6 (2), 318--340.doi: 10.1075/jlac.00015.gar.

31. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2001). Arguing about the future: on indirect disagreements in conversation.Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1881--1900.

32. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations.Journal of Pragmatics, 7 (6), 657--677.doi: 10.1016/0378 2166(83)90089-9.

33. Graham, Sage (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 742--759.doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017.

34. Gray, Peter H. (2001). A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices. Decision Support Systems, 31 (1), 87--102.doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00121-4.

35. Hay, Jennifer (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women.Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (6), 709--742.

36. Hernandez Flores, Nieves (2003). Cortes^ay contextossocioculturalesen la conversacionde familiaresy amigos.Actas del primer coloquiodelprograma EDICE `La perspectiva no etnocentristade la cortesia: identidad sociocultural de lascomunidadeshispanohablantes'.Estocolmo: Programa EDICE, Universidad de Estocolmo, 121--127.

37. Hernandez-Lopez, Maria de la O (2016). Disagreement and degrees of assertiveness in service encounters: Purchase vs problem-solving interactions. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4 (2), 87--104.

38. Hernandez-Lopez, Maria de la O & Luda Fernandez-Amaya (2019). What makes (im)politeness for travellers? Spanish tourists' perceptions at national and international hotels.Journal of Politeness Research, 15 (2), 195--222.doi: 10.1515/pr-2016-0060.

39. Herring, Susan C. (2015).New frontiers in interactive multimodal communication.In Geor- gopoulou, A. & T. Spilloti (eds.) The Routledgehandbook of language and digital communication.London: Routledge, 398--402.

40. Jewitt, Carey (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In Price, S., C. Jewitt& B. Brown (eds.) The SAGE handbook of digital technology research. London: SAGE Publications, 250--265.

41. Johnston, Maximiliam, Dominic King, SonalArora, Nebil Behar, ThanosAthanasiou, Nick Sevdalis&AraDarzi (2015). Smartphones let surgeons know Whatsapp: An analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery, 209 (1), 45--51.doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030.

42. Jones, Rodney H. &HafnerChristoph, A. (2012).Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. London: Routledge.

43. Kakava, Christina (1993). Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, USA.

44. Kakava, Christina (2002). Opposition in modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints.

45. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (10), 1537--1568.doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00075-9.

46. KamelBoulos, Maged, Dean Giustini& Steve Wheeler (2016).Instagram and WhatsApp in health and healthcare: An overview. Future Internet8 (3), 37.doi: 10.3390/fi8030037.

47. Kreutel, Karen (2007). “I'm Not Agree with You.” ESL Learners' Expressions of Disagreement.TESL-EJ, 11 (3), 1--20.

48. Langlotz, Andreas & Miriam A. Locher (2012). Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1591--1606.

49. Locher, Miriam A. (2004).Power and politeness in action: Disagreement in oral communication. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

50. Ma^zArйvalo, Carmen (2018). Emotional self-presentation on Whatsapp: Analysis of the profile status.

51. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22 (1), 144--160.doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-144-160. Malamed, Lewis H. (2010). How to disagree agreeably. In Martmez-Flor, A. & E. Uso-Juan (eds.) Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 199--216. doi: 10.1075/lllt.26.12mal.

52. Masoumeh, Mehregan, AbbassEslamirasekh, DabaghiAzizollah&JafariSereshtDavood (2013).Disagreement expressions in the discourse of young Persian speakers.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 598--604.

53. Netz, Hadar (2014). Disagreement patterns in gifted classes. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 142--160.doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.007.

54. O'Hara, Kenton, Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens & Jessica Morris (2014).Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp.Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, 1131--1143.

55. Pйrez-Sabater, Carmen (2012). The linguistics of social networking: A study of writing conventions on Facebook. Linguistik Online, 56 (6), 81--93.doi: 10.13092/lo.56.257.

56. Pйrez-Sabater, Carmen (2015). Discovering language variation in Whatsapp text interactions.Ono- mвzein: RevistaSemestralde Lingьistica, Filologiay Traduccion, 31 (1), 113--126. doi: 10.7764/onomazein.31.8.

57. Petitjean, Cйcile & Etienne Morel (2017). `Hahaha': Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 110, 1--19.doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001. Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features ofpreferred/ dispreferred turn shaped.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

58. Rees-Miller, Janie (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement.Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (8), 1087--1111.doi: 10.1016/S0378 2166(99)00088-0.

59. Rubio-Romero, Juana & Marta Perlado de Espinosa (2015). El fenomenoWhatsApp en el contexto de la comunicacion personal: unaaproximacion a travйsde los jovenesuniversitarios. Revista ICONO14. Revistacientificade Comunicaciony Tecnologiasemergentes, 13 (2), 73--94.doi: 10.7195/ri14.v13i2.818.

60. Sacks, Harvey (1987).On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequence in conversation.Talk and Social Organization, 54, 54--69.

61. Sampietro, Agnese (2016a). Emoticonosy multimodalidad. El uso del pulgarhaciaarribaen WhatsApp. Aposta.Revistade CienciasSociales,69, 271--295.

62. Sampietro, Agnese (2016b). Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats.LenguasModernas, 47, 91--113.

63. Sanchez-Moya, Alfonso & Olga Cruz-Moya (2015a).Whatsapp, textese, and moral panics: Discourse features and habits across two generations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 300-- 306.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069.

64. Sanchez-Moya, Alfonso & Olga Cruz-Moya (2015b).`Hey there! I am using Whatsapp': A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of Whatsapp statuses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 52--60.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298.

65. Schiffrin, Deborah (1984). Jewish argument as sociability.Language in Society, 13, 311--335.

66. Schnurr, Stephanie (2010). Humour.In Locher, M. A. & S.L. Graham (eds.) Interpersonal pragmatics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 307--326.

67. Shum, Winnie & Cynthia Lee (2013). (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 50, 52--83.

68. Sifianou, Maria (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness.Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1554--1564.

69. Sornig, Karl (1977). Disagreement and contradiction as communicative acts.Journal of Pragmatics, 1 (4), 347 374.doi: 10.1016/0378 2166(77)90028-5.

70. Swales, John (1990).Genre analysis.English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

71. Tannen, Deborah (1981). New York Jewish conversational style.International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 30, 133--149.doi: 10.1515/ijsl.1981.30.133.

72. Tannen, Deborah (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.

73. Tannen, Deborah (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation.New York: Ballantine.

74. Tannen, Deborah (1998). The argument culture. New York: Random House.

75. Tjosvold, Dean (2008). The conflict-positive organization: It depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (1), 19--28.doi: 10.1002/job.473.

76. Xu, Lingling (2017). Disagreement studies reviewed and my coy disagreements. Studies in English Language Teaching, 5 (4), 679--694.doi: 10.22158/selt.v5n4p679.

77. Yus, Francisco (2011). Cyberpragmatics.Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.213.

78. Yus, Francisco (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagemem (Dis)curso, 14 (3), 511-- 529. doi: 10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414.

79. Yus, Francisco (2017). Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in Whatsapp communication.Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 66--86. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003.

80. Zhu, Weihua (2014). Managing relationships in everyday practice: The case of strong disagreement in mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 85--87. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.010.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

  • The word "family" is connected with warm relations between members. Family relations. Both the husband and the wife create their future together. Children should love and respect the parents. A family role in children's formation of individuality.

    топик [11,2 K], добавлен 04.02.2009

  • The relationships between man and woman. The conflicts in family and avoiding conflicts. The difference between fast food and homemade food. The communication between two or more people. Distinguishing of international good and bad superstitions.

    сочинение [7,9 K], добавлен 12.12.2010

  • Theory of the communicative language teaching. Principles and features of the communicative approach. Methodological aspects of teaching communication. Typology of communicative language activities. Approbation of technology teaching communication.

    курсовая работа [608,8 K], добавлен 20.10.2014

  • Descriptions verbal communication in different cultures. The languages as the particular set of speech norms. Analysis general rules of speaking. Features nonverbal communication in different countries. Concept of communication as complicated process.

    реферат [213,9 K], добавлен 25.04.2012

  • Language is the most important aspect in the life of all beings. General information about Proto-Indo-European language. Proto-Indo-European phonology. Comparison of modern languages of origin. All words about family, particularly family members.

    курсовая работа [30,2 K], добавлен 12.12.2013

  • The topic of the lesson - families and relatives. All people have families, big or small. Why do we really need to have a family? The guests of the lesson tell a lot about family, because one of them has a big family, but another one has no family at all.

    контрольная работа [19,2 K], добавлен 29.01.2010

  • The theory and practice of raising the effectiveness of business communication from the linguistic and socio-cultural viewpoint. Characteristics of business communication, analysis of its linguistic features. Specific problems in business interaction.

    курсовая работа [46,5 K], добавлен 16.04.2011

  • Communication process is not limited to what we say with words. There are 3 elements of communication: Words (7% of information is communicated though words), Body language (55%) and tone of voice (38%). Thus, 93% of communication is non-verbal.

    топик [4,5 K], добавлен 25.08.2006

  • Interjections in language and in speech. The functioning of interjections in Spanish and English spoken discourse. Possible reasons for the choice of different ways of rendering an interjection. Strategies of the interpretation of interjections.

    дипломная работа [519,2 K], добавлен 28.09.2014

  • The United kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland. Kings and Queens of England. The Queen’s role. Queen and Commonwealth. Members of the Royal Family. The Royal Collection. The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace. Kensington Palace.

    дипломная работа [4,1 M], добавлен 30.06.2003

  • The nature of speaking and oral interaction. Communicative approach and language teaching. Types of communicative exercises and approaches. Games as a way at breaking the routine of classroom drill. Some Practical Techniques for Language Teaching.

    дипломная работа [72,3 K], добавлен 21.07.2009

  • Role and functions of verbal communication. Epictetus quotes. Example for sympathetic, empathetic listening. Effective verbal communication skills. Parameters of evaluation. Factors correct pronunciation. Use of types of pauses when communicating.

    презентация [53,0 K], добавлен 06.02.2014

  • The model of training teachers to the formation of communicative competence. How the Web 2.0 technology tools affect on secondary school students in communication. The objective of the model is instantiated a number of conditions. Predicting the Future.

    курсовая работа [30,3 K], добавлен 11.06.2012

  • The general English programmes for students from backgrounds. Objectives of teaching business English. The rules of grammar, the domain of vocabulary and pronunciation. Major elements of business English. The concept of intercultural communication.

    реферат [22,0 K], добавлен 21.03.2012

  • Basic approaches to the study of the English language. Intercultural communication and computerization of education. The use of technical means for intensification of the educational process. The use of video and Internet resources in the classroom.

    курсовая работа [333,1 K], добавлен 02.07.2014

  • Systematic framework for external analysis. Audience, medium and place of communication. The relevance of the dimension of time and text function. General considerations on the concept of style. Intratextual factors in translation text analysis.

    курс лекций [71,2 K], добавлен 23.07.2009

  • What things make you happy? It may be simply winter, pets or walking in the forest. There is such comfort in having friends who knows and loves you. Sunrise, as a favorite time of the day. White peonies in your own garden, birthdays party and family.

    презентация [1,0 M], добавлен 20.10.2013

  • The process of scientific investigation. Contrastive Analysis. Statistical Methods of Analysis. Immediate Constituents Analysis. Distributional Analysis and Co-occurrence. Transformational Analysis. Method of Semantic Differential. Contextual Analysis.

    реферат [26,5 K], добавлен 31.07.2008

  • Wimm-Bill-Dann as a producer in dairy products and one of the leader children’s food in Russia. The SWOT and PEST analysis of the enterprise. The individual critical reflection on learning outcomes. The ways of the effective communication with customers.

    контрольная работа [30,9 K], добавлен 17.02.2011

  • Culture in the Foreign language classroom. Cross-cultural communication. The importance of teaching culture in the foreign language classroom. The role of interactive methods in teaching foreign intercultural communication: passive, active, interactive.

    курсовая работа [83,2 K], добавлен 02.07.2014

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.