Past tense forms of the verb ’be’ in modal constructions in Udmurt
The use of val and vylem in four modal constructions: deontic, desirable and permissive. Counterfactual conditional sentences. Difference between modal use of particles. A comprehensive study of the differences between the first and second past tenses.
| Рубрика | Иностранные языки и языкознание |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | английский |
| Дата добавления | 18.03.2022 |
| Размер файла | 86,0 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
It is possible that there is an adversative function of val and vylem in the desiderative modal construction, in the imperative mood and in the pluperfect tenses. However, further analyses are required in order to establish this function of the past tense forms of the existential verb and characterize its relation to their temporal use and modal attenuation.
Abbreviations
2, 3: first, second, third person
1PST: first past tense
2PST: second past tense
ABL: ablative
ACC: accusative
ATT: attenuator
CAR: caritive
CNG: connegative
COMP: comparative
CONJ: conjunctive
DAT: dative
DEM: demonstrative
PN: proper noun
PRS: present tense
PST: past tense
PL: plural
POSS: possessive
PP: postposition
PTC: particle
PTCP: participle
ELA: elative
F: feminine
FUT: future tense
GEN: genitive
IMP: imperative
INF: infinitive
INE: inessive
INS: instrumental
ILL: illative
NEG: negation
NMLZ: nominalizer
OPT: optative mood
PTCP.ACT: active participle
PTCP.NESS: necessitive participle
PTCP.PRF: perfect participle
REFL: reflexive
SG: singular
Q: question clitic
QUOT: quotative particle
References
1. Tarakanov I.V. Uslovnoye naklaneniye, yego znacheniya i proiskhozhdeniye suffiksa -sal v udmurtskom yazyke [The conditional mood, its meaning and the origin of the suffix -sal in the Udmurt language]. In: Tarakanov V.I. (ed.) Issledovaniya i razmyshleniya ob udmurtskom yazyke. (Sbornik statey) [Studies and reflections ont he Udmurt language (Digest of articles)]. Udmurtia, Izhevsk. 1998. P. 168-180. In Russian.
2. Tarakanov I.V. Karonkyl [Verb]. In: Timerkhanova, N.N. (ed.) Udmurt kyllen veraskonl'ukettodosez (morfologijez) [The morphology of the Udmurt language]. Izhevsk. 2011. P. 138-254. In Udmurt.
3. Zakiev M.Z. Tatarskaya grammatika [The Grammar of Tatar. Vol. 3. Syntax]. Kazan: Tatarskoye knizhnoye izdatel'stvo. 1992. Vol. 3 Sintaksis [Syntax]. 488. p. In Russian.
4. Aikhenvald A.Y. Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2004. 480 p. In English. Aikhenvald AY. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology. 2012. Vol. 16. P. 435-485. In English. Bartens R. Permilaisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of the Permic languages]. Suomalais-ugralaisen seuran toimituksia [Issues of the Finno-Ugrian Society] 238. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura [Finno-Ugrian Society]. 2000. 372 p. In Finnish.
5. Chung S., Timberlake A. Tense, aspect and mood. In: Shopen, T. (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description vol. III, Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985. P. 241-258. In English. de Haan F. Typology of Tense, Aspect, and Modality Systems. In: Song, J.J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. New York: Oxford University Press. 2010. P. 445-464. In English.
6. Hofmann T.R. Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics. Routledge, London. 2013. 360 p. In English.
7. DeLancey S. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology. 1997. Vol. 1. P. 33-52. In English.
8. Greed T. The expression of knowledge in Tatar. In: Aikhenvald, A.Y. & Dixon, R.M.W. (eds.) The grammar of knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. New York: Oxford University Press. 2014. P. 69-88. In English.
9. Iatridou S. The Grammatical Ingredients of Counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquery. 2000. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 231-270. In English.
10. Kelmakov V.V., Hannikainen S. Udmurtin kielioppia ja harjoituksia [Udmurt grammar and exercises]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura [Finno-Ugrian Society]. 1999. 319. p. In Finnish.
11. Kiefer F. Jelenteselmelet [Theory of meaning]. Budapest: Corvina Kiado. 2007. 381 p. In Hungarian. Kozmacs I. Udmurt nyelvkonyv [Udmurt textbook]. Szeged: JATEPress. 2002. 133 p. In Hungarian. Kubitsch R. Evidencialitas a mai udmurt nyelvben [Evidentiality in contemporary Udmurt]. In: Scheibl Gy. (ed.) Lingdok 17.: Nyelveszdoktoranduszok dolgozatai [Lingdok 17.: Papers of PhD students in linguistics], Szeged: Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, Nyelvtudomanyi Doktori Iskola. 2018. P. 251-270. In Hungarian.
12. Kubitsch R. Az udmurt indirekt evidencialis mirafiv jelentesarnyalata. [The mirative connotation of the Udmurt indirect evidential] In: Scheibl Gy. (ed.) Lingdok 18.: Nyelveszdoktoranduszok dolgozatai [Lingdok 18.: Papers of PhD students in linguistics] Szeged: Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, Nyelvtudomanyi Doktori Iskola. 2019. P. 25-40. In Hungarian.
13. Kubitsch R. A letige mult ideju alakjai mint modalis partikulak az udmurt nyelvben [The past tense forms of the verb 'be' as modal particles]. Nyelvtudomanyi Kozlemenyek [Papers in Linguistics] 2020. Vol. 116. P. 97-137. In Hungarian.
14. Kugler N. Megfigyeles es kovetkeztetes a nyelvi tevekenysegben [Observation and conclusion in language activity in Hungarian]. Budapest: Tinta Konyvkiado. 2015. 280 p. In Hungarian.
15. Kugler N. Az evidencialitas es a modalitas [Evidentiality and modality]. In: Tolcsvai, N.G. (ed.) Nyelvtan [Grammar]. Budapest: Osiris Kiado. 2017. P. 464-494. In Hungarian.
16. Malchukov A.L., Xrakovskij V.S. The Linguistic Interaction of Mood with Modality and Other Categories. In: Nuyts, J. - Van Der Auwera, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. P. 196-222. In English.
17. Nuyts J. Analyses of the Modal Meaning. In: Nuyts, J. - Van Der Auwera, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. P. 31-49. In English.
18. Palmer F.R. Mood and modality (Second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001. 236 p. In English.
19. Poppe N. Tatar Manual. Uralic and Altaic Series 25. Bloomington: Indiana University. 1963. 271 p. In English.
20. Saraheimo M. Finite remote past tense in Udmurt: Temporal, modal and pragmatic functions. Forthcoming. In English.
21. Siegl F. The 2nd past in the Permic languages. M.A. Thesis. Tartu. 2004. 189 p. In English.
22. Skribnik E., Kehayov P. Evidentials in Uralic Languages. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. P. 525-555. In English.
23. Timberlake A. A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004. 510. p. In English.
24. Winkler E. Udmurt. Languages of the World/Materials 212. Mьnchen: Lincom Europa. 2001. 85. p. In English.
25. Winkler E. Udmurtische Grammatik [The Grammar of Udmurt]. Verцffentlichungen Der Societas Uralo- Altaica [Issues of the Uralo-Altaic Society] 81. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 2011. 188. p. In German.
Литература
1. Закиев М.З. Татарская грамматика, Казань: Татарское книжное издательство. 1992. Том. 3 Синтаксис. 488. с.
2. Тараканов И.В. Условное наклонение, его значения и происхождение суффикса -сал в удмуртском языке // Исследования и размышления об удмуртском языке. Ижевск, 1998. С. 168-180.
3. Тараканов И.В. Каронкыл // Удмурт кыллэн вераськонлюкеттодосэз (морфологиез) Ижевск, 2011. Б. 138-254.
4. Aikhenvald A.Y. Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2004. 480 p. In English.
5. Aikhenvald A.Y. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology. 2012. Vol. 16. P. 435-485. In English.
6. Bartens R. Permilaisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of the Permic languages]. Suomalais-ugralaisen seuran toimituksia [Issues of the Finno-Ugrian Society] 238. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura [Finno-Ugrian Society]. 2000. 372 p. In Finnish.
7. Chung S., Timberlake A. Tense, aspect and mood. In: Shopen, T. (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description vol. III, Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985. P. 241-258. In English.
8. de Haan F. Typology of Tense, Aspect, and Modality Systems. In: Song, J. J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. New York: Oxford University Press. 2010. P. 445-464. In English.
9. Hofmann T.R. Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics. Routledge, London. 2013. 360 p. In English.
10. DeLancey S. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology. 1997. Vol. 1. P. 33-52. In English.
11. Greed T. The expression of knowledge in Tatar. In: Aikhenvald, A.Y. & Dixon, R.M.W. (eds.) The grammar of knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. New York: Oxford University Press. 2014. P. 69-88. In English.
12. Iatridou S. The Grammatical Ingredients of Counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquery. 2000. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 231-270. In English.
13. Kelmakov V.V., Hannikainen S. Udmurtin kielioppia ja harjoituksia [Udmurt grammar and exercises]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura [Finno-Ugrian Society]. 1999. 319. p. In Finnish.
14. Kiefer F. Jelenteselmelet [Theory of meaning]. Budapest: Corvina Kiado. 2007. 381 p. In Hungarian. KozmacsI. Udmurt nyelvkonyv [Udmurt textbook]. Szeged: JATEPress. 2002. 133 p. In Hungarian. Kubitsch R. Evidencialitas a mai udmurt nyelvben [Evidentiality in contemporary Udmurt]. In: Scheibl Gy. (ed.) Lingdok 17.: Nyelveszdoktoranduszok dolgozatai [Lingdok 17.: Papers of PhD students in linguistics], Szeged: Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, Nyelvtudomanyi Doktori Iskola. 2018. P. 251-270. In Hungarian.
15. Kubitsch R. Az udmurt indirekt evidencialis miratrv jelentesarnyalata. [The mirative connotation of the Udmurt indirect evidential] In: Scheibl Gy. (ed.) Lingdok 18.: Nyelveszdoktoranduszok dolgozatai [Lingdok 18.: Papers of PhD students in linguistics] Szeged: Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, Nyelvtudomanyi Doktori Iskola. 2019. P. 25-40. In Hungarian.
16. Kubitsch R. A letige mhlt idejh alakjai mint modalis partikulak az udmurt nyelvben [The past tense forms of the verb 'be' as modal particles]. Nyelvtudomanyi Kozlemenyek [Papers in Linguistics] 2020. Vol. 116. P. 97-137. In Hungarian.
17. Kugler N. Megfigyeles es kovetkeztetes a nyelvi tevekenysegben [Observation and conclusion in language activity in Hungarian]. Budapest: Tinta Konyvkiado. 2015. 280 p. In Hungarian.
18. Kugler N. Az evidencialitas es a modalitas [Evidentiality and modality]. In: Tolcsvai, N.G. (ed.) Nyelvtan [Grammar]. Budapest: Osiris Kiado. 2017. P. 464-494. In Hungarian.
19. Malchukov A.L., Xrakovskij V.S. The Linguistic Interaction of Mood with Modality and Other Categories. In: Nuyts, J. - Van Der Auwera, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. P. 196-222. In English.
20. Nuyts J. Analyses of the Modal Meaning. In: Nuyts, J. - Van Der Auwera, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. P. 31-49. In English.
21. Palmer F.R. Mood and modality (Second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001. 236 p. In English.
22. Poppe N. Tatar Manual. Uralic and Altaic Series 25. Bloomington: Indiana University. 1963. 271 p. In English.
23. Saraheimo M. Finite remote past tense in Udmurt: Temporal, modal and pragmatic functions. Forthcoming. In English.
24. Siegl F. The 2nd past in the Permic languages. M.A. Thesis. Tartu. 2004. 189 p. In English.
25. SkribnikE., Kehayov P. Evidentials in Uralic Languages. In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. P. 525-555. In English.
26. Timberlake A. A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004. 510. p. In English.
27. Winkler E. Udmurt. Languages of the World/Materials 212. Mьnchen: Lincom Europa. 2001. 85. p. In English.
28. Winkler E. Udmurtische Grammatik [The Grammar of Udmurt]. Verцffentlichungen Der Societas Uralo-Altaica [Issues of the Uralo-Altaic Society] 81. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 2011. 188. p. In German.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
Using constructions "There is/ There are". Form "to be going to" sentences, meaning. Test exercises with pronouns. The Future Indefinite Tense. Modal verbs, the articles, noun. Past Tenses, passive voice, the Sequence of Tenses, prepositions in English.
тест [49,6 K], добавлен 10.12.2011Modal verbs in middle English. Functions of modal verbs in modern English. The meaning of modal verbs in translation. Differences and peculiarities of the usage of modal verbs in newspapers and fiction. The usage of modal verbs in business English.
курсовая работа [59,7 K], добавлен 27.09.2012The rules and examples of using modal verbs in English: may, mights, can, could, allow. The difference of meaning between verbs. Using perfect infinitive to express an unfulfilled obligation. Examples of Absence of obligation and unnecessary action.
презентация [20,7 K], добавлен 29.09.2011Use the verbs in the brackets in a suitable form. Suggest a suitable modal verb or a modal construction to complete the sentences. Translate the sentences into Russian. Use the verb in brackets in a suitable form. Underline a non-finite form of the verb.
контрольная работа [20,0 K], добавлен 11.03.2009The area of the finite verb including particular questions tense, aspect and modal auxiliary usage. The categories of verb morphology: time, possibility, hypothesis, desirability, verb agreement. American sign language and the category of voice.
курсовая работа [41,3 K], добавлен 21.07.2009Can, may, We can compare may and can. Must. Must and May compared. To have to. To be to. Must, to have to and to be to compared. Ought to. Shall and should. Must, Should and ought to compared. Should + Perfect infinitive.
дипломная работа [35,2 K], добавлен 22.07.2006The Non-Finite Forms of the Verbs. The Predicative Constructions with Non-Finite Forms of the Verbs. The Predicative Infinitive Constructions. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction. The Subjective-with-the-Infinitive Construction. The For-to-Infi
курсовая работа [25,0 K], добавлен 04.02.2007Degrees of comparison of adjectives and adverbs, тhe generala word order in the English offer. Impersonal and indefinite-personal offers. Correct and irregular verbs. Modal verbs and their substitutes. Concord of tenses in the main and additional offers.
учебное пособие [208,0 K], добавлен 26.10.2009The usage of the Perfect Tenses in different original texts. Investigation of the functioning of the Perfect Tenses in the works of English and American writers. The formation and application of the Perfect Tenses. Analyze the Perfect Continuous forms.
курсовая работа [262,9 K], добавлен 14.10.2014Grammatical categories. The category of passivity. Peculiarities of using sentences with the verb in the passive voice. Ways of expressing the passive voice. The passive constructions. The implicit agent in English passives. Agentless passives.
курсовая работа [67,5 K], добавлен 24.03.2014The category of activity and passivity. Basic Grammatical categories. Peculiarities of using sentences with the verb in the passive voice. Ways of expressing the passive voice. The passive constructions. The implicit agent in English passives.
курсовая работа [40,7 K], добавлен 15.03.2014Analysis of expression of modality in English language texts. Its use as a basic syntactic categories. Evaluation modalities of expression of linguistic resources. Composite modal predicate verb is necessary in the sense of denial assumption corresponds.
курсовая работа [29,1 K], добавлен 10.01.2015The future perfect tense is an easy tense to understand. The future perfect tense talks about the past in the future. The Future Perfect is used for an action which will be finished before a stated future time. Usage of Future Perfect Continuous Tense.
презентация [136,1 K], добавлен 05.03.2011Реалізація категорії минулого доконаного граматичного часу дієслова в залежності від його різнопланової семантики у функціональних стилях сучасної англійської мови. Вживання the Past Perfect Tense у часових та причинно-наслідкових підрядних реченнях.
курсовая работа [38,1 K], добавлен 05.01.2013Применение глаголов в Present Simple, Past Simple Tense и Future Simple Tense. Образование повествовательных и вопросительных предложений. Формы настоящего времени глагола to do. Редуцированные (сокращённые) формы вспомогательных глаголов с частицей not.
контрольная работа [16,7 K], добавлен 16.06.2010Образование временных групп Continuous; употребление The Present Continuous, The Past Continuous, The Future Continuous Tense, перевод на русский язык. Выбор пропущенных словосочетаний в предложениях; правильные формы глагола; аннотация, деловое письмо.
контрольная работа [37,5 K], добавлен 24.04.2011Граматичне та фонетичне використання слова "need" та похідних від нього в якості правильного та недостатнього дієслова в англійської мові. Значення модального дієслова і його вживання в питальних і заперечних реченнях за допомогою допоміжних слів.
презентация [372,1 K], добавлен 26.04.2016The subject of the sentence in two grammatical categories: number and person. Grammatical categories of the verbals. Morphological classification of verbs. The main difference between the strong and weak verbs. The principal forms and minor groups.
презентация [200,7 K], добавлен 20.10.2013Study of lexical and morphological differences of the women’s and men’s language; grammatical forms of verbs according to the sex of the speaker. Peculiarities of women’s and men’s language and the linguistic behavior of men and women across languages.
дипломная работа [73,0 K], добавлен 28.01.2014The background of the research of stylistic potential of tense-aspect verbal forms. The analysis of stylistic potential of tense-aspect verbal forms in modern English. Methodological recommendations for teaching of tense-aspect verbal forms in English.
дипломная работа [93,5 K], добавлен 20.07.2009
