Структура символа и механизмы символизации в художественном тексте

Систематизация существующих в современной филологической науке взглядов на природу основных структурных составляющих символа, выявление механизмов символизации в художественном тексте. Определение роли профилирования в создании художественного образа.

Рубрика Иностранные языки и языкознание
Вид статья
Язык русский
Дата добавления 22.05.2022
Размер файла 79,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

32. Толстая С. М. Семантические категории языка культуры: Очерки по славянской этнолингвистике. 2-е изд. Москва: URSS, 2011. 368 с.

33. Флоренский П. А. Статьи и исследования по истории и философии искусства и археологии. Москва: Мысль, 2000. 446 с.

34. Шелестюк Е. В. О лингвистическом исследовании символа. Вопросы языкознания. Москва: Наука, 1997. № 4. С. 125-143.

35. Якобсон Р. О. Лингвистика и поэтика / пер. с франц. И. А. Мельчука. Структурализм: «за» и «против»: сб. статей. Москва: Прогресс, 1975. С. 193-230.

36. Якушевич И. В. Семантико-семиотическая модель символа и его языковое варьирование в поэтическом тексте (на материале поэзии XIX-XX вв.): дис.... докт. филол. наук: 10.02.01. Москва, МГПУ, 2016. 562 с.

References

1. Avdeenko, I. A. (2013), “On the issue of the symbol as conventional sign of a special kind”, Philology. Theory & practice [“K voprosu o simvole kak konventsional'nom znake osobogo roda”, Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii ipraktiki], Tambov, No. 1 (19), pp. 15-17.

2. Averintsev, S. S. (1971), “Artistic Symbol”, Concise Literary Encyclopedia: in 9 volumes, [“Simvol khudozhest- vennyy”, Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya: v 9 t.], Soviet encyclopedia, vol. 6, pp. 826-831.

3. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999), Language and the space of human [Jazyk i mir cheloveka], Languages of Russian culture, Moscow, I-XV, 896 p.

4. Afanasyeva, N. A. (2001), Symbols as semiotic concepts of the language model of M. Tsvetaeva: Thesis [Simvoly kak semioticheskie koncepty yazykovoy modeli mira M. Tsvetayevoy: dis.... kand. fllol. nauk], Cherepovets, 169 p.

5. Babaytsev, A. V. (2010), “Sign, symbol, emblem: differentiation of concepts”, Vestnik of Don State Technical University [“Znak, simvol, emblem: differentsiatsiya ponyatiy”, Vestnik DGTU], Rostov on Don, vol. 10, issue 6 (49), pp. 991-1000.

6. Barthes, R. (2004), “Myth today”, Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics [“Mif segodnya”, Izbrannye raboty: Semio- tika. Poetika], Sabashnikovs Publishing house, Moscow, pp.72-130.

7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979), Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity [Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva], Iskusstvo, Moscow, 424 p.

8. Vinogradov, V. V. (1922), “About Anna Akhmatova's symbolic”, Literary Thought: Almanac 1 [“O simvolike Anny Akhmatovoy”, Literaturnaya mysl'. Almanakh 1], Kolos, Petrograd, pp. 91-138.

9. Gazheva, I. D. (2007), “Linguistic anomalies in the prose of A. Bely”, Scientific notes of Taurida V. I. Vernadsky National University, Philology, Social communications [“Yazykovyye anomalii v proze A. Belogo”, Uchen. zapiski TNU im. V. I. Vernadskogo, Filologiya, Sotsial'nyye kommunikatsii], Simferopol, vol. 23 (61), issue 4, pp. 261-266.

10. Gazheva, I. D. (2014), “Aspects and methods of studying metonymy in modern linguistics”, Mova / Language [“Aspekty i metody izucheniya metonimii v sovremennoy lingvistike”, Mova:. naukovo-teoretychnyy chasopys], Astroprint, Odessa, vol. 21, pp. 150 -154.

11. Gazheva, I. D. (2020), ““...while the sun was setting”: the Evening Light in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky and Andrey Bely”, Dostoevsky and World Culture, Philological journal [«...egda zakhozhdashe solntse»: svet vecherniy v proizvedeniyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo I Andreya Belogo, Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskiy zhurnal], No. 1 (9), pp. 51-82.

12. Hegel, G. V. F. (1969), “Aesthetics”, Works: in 4 volumes [“Estetika”, Sochineniya: v 4 t.], Iskusstvo, Moscow, vol. 2, 326 p.

13. Dostoevsky, F. M. (1972-1990), Complete works: in 30 vols. [Poln. sobr. soch.: v 30 t.], Nauka, Leningrad.

14. Durylin, S. (1928), “About one symbol in Dostoevsky. Experience of a thematic review”, Dostoevsky: Proceedings of the State Academy of Arts. Literary section [“Ob odnom simvole u Dostoevskogo. Opyt tematicheskogo obzora”, Dostoyevskiy: Trudy Gosudarstvennoy Akademii Khudozhestvennykh nauk. Literaturnaya sektsiya], GAKhN, Moscow, pp.163-198.

15. Ivanov, Viach. I. (1974), “Two Elements in Contemporary Symbolism”, Collected Works [“Dve stikhii v sovre- mennom simvolizme”, Sobranie sochineniy], Brussels, vol. 2, pp. 536-561.

16. Karasik, V. I. (2002), “Cultural dominants in language”, Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse [“Kul'turnye dominanty v yazyke”, Yazykovoy krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs], Peremena, Volgograd, pp. 166-205.

17. Karpenko, A. V. (2002), “Symbol. Sign. Image”, Culture of Black Sea People [“Simvol. Znak. Obraz”, Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya], Taurida V. I. Vernadsky National University, Simferopol, No. 33,pp. 186-190.

18. Kolesov, V. V. (1992), “The concept of culture: image-concept-symbol”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University [“Koncept kul'tury: obraz-ponyatie-simvol”, Vestnik SPbGU], Series 2, No. 16, pp. 30-40.

19. Kukhta, M. S. (2004), “Specific Character of Sense Representation in Icon Symbols: the Postnonclassic Interpretation of the C. S. Peirce Theory”, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin [“Spetsifika reprezentatsii smysla v ikonicheskikh simvolakh: postneklassicheskaya interpretatsiya teorii Ch. S. Pirsa”, Vestnik TGPU], Tomsk, No. 2 (39), pp. 39-45.

20. Larin, B. A. (1927), “About the lyrics as a variety of artistic speech”, Russian Speech [“O lirike kak raznovidnosti khudozhestvennoy rechi”, Russkaya rech], Leningrad, vol. 1, pp. 42-74.

21. Larin, B. A. (1927), “The doctrine of the symbol in Indian poetics”, Poetics. Annals of the Department of Verbal Arts of the Institute of Art History [“Uchenie o simvole v indiyskoy poetike”, Poetika. Vremennik Otdela slovesnykh iskusstv In-ta istorii iskusstv], Leningrad, pp. 29-40.

22. Losev, A. F. (1965), “Symbol”, Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 5 volumes [“Simvol”, Filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 5 t.], Soviet encyclopedia, Moscow, pp. 10-11.

23. Losev, A. F. (1990), Passion for dialectics. The literary reflections of the philosopher [“Strast' k dialektike”, Lit- eraturnyye razmyshleniya filosofa], Sovetskiy pisatel' Publishing house, Moscow, 320 p.

24. Losev, A. (1995), The problem of the symbol and realistic art [Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo], Iskusstvo Publishing house, Moscow, 1995, 368 p.

25. Lotman, Yu. M. (1996), “Symbol in the system of culture”, Inside the thinking worlds. Human-Text-Semio- sphere-History [“Simvol v sisteme kultury”, Vnutri mysliashchikh mirov. Chelovek-Tekst-Semiosfera-Istoriya], Languages of Russian culture, Moscow, pp. 146-160.

26. Okhotsimskiy, A. D. (2011), “Fire in the Bible”, Fire and light in the sacred space: Materials from International Symposium [“Ogon' v Biblii”, Ogon' i svet v sakral'nomprostranstve: Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma], Indrik, Moscow, pp. 168-190.

27. Piaget, J. (2003), Psychology of intelligence, transl. from Eng. and Fr. [Psikhologiya intellekta], Piter, St. Petersburg, 192 p.

28. Serebryanska, I. M. (2008), “The symbolic component in the structure of the concept “leleka” [stork] (on the materials of M. Stelmakh's works)”, Lingvistichni doslidzhennja: Collection of Scientific Papers [“Symvolichnyy kompo- nent u strukturi kontseptu «leleka» (na materiali tvoriv M. Stel'makha)”, Linhvistychni doslidzhennya: zb. nauk. prats'], Kharkiv, vol. 26, pp. 88-92.

29. Saussure, F. (1977), Works on linguistics [Trudy po yazykoznaniyu], Progress, Moscow, 695 p.

30. Stepanov, Yu. S. (2004), Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture, 3rd ed. [Konstanty: slovar' russkoy kul'tury, 3 izd.], Akadem. proekt, Moscow, 991 p.

31. Todorov, Ts. (1998), Theories of the symbol [Teorii simvola], House of Intellectual Books, Russian Phenomenological Society, Moscow, 408 p.

32. Tolstaya, S. M. (2010), Semantic Categories of Language and Culture: Essays on Slavic Ethnolinguistics, 2nd ed. [Semanticheskiye kategorii yazyka kul'tury: Ocherki po slavyanskoy etnolingvistike, 2 izd.], LIBROCOM Book house, Moscow, 368 p.

33. Florensky, P. A. (2000), Articles and studies on the history and philosophy of art and archeology [Stat'i i issledo- vaniyapo istorii i filosofii iskusstva i arheologii], Mysl' Publishing house, Moscow, 446 p.

34. Shelestyuk, E. V. (1997), “On the linguistic study of the symbol (a survey of literature)”, Topics in the study of language [“O lingvisticheskom issledovanii simvola”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya], Nauka, Moscow, No. 4, pp. 125-143.

35. Yakobson, R. O. (1975), “Linguistics and poetics”, Structuralism: for and against [“Lingvistika i poetika”, Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv»], Progress, Moscow, pp. 193-230.

36. Yakushevich, I. V. (2016), “Semantic-semiotic model of a symbol and its linguistic variation in a poetic text (based on the poetry of the 19th-20th centuries)”: Thesis [Semantiko-semioticheskaya model' simvola i ego yazykovoye var'irovanie v poeticheskom tekste (na materiale poezii XIX-XX vv.): Dis.... dokt. filol. nauk: 10.02.01], Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, 562 p.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.