Grammatical and stylistic features of fixed word combinations in the Azerbaijani language western group dialects

Размещено на http://allbest.ru

Baku Slavic University

Grammatical and stylistic features of fixed word combinations in the Azerbaijani language western group dialects

Asadova M.F.

Abstract

The article has been dedicated to grammatical features of phraseological units (phrasemes) in the Azerbaijani language western group dialects. According to the grammatical peculiarities, phraseological units in question are divided into two groups: noun and verb collocations, just as in the traditional linguistics. In the analysis noun and verb collocations are classified according to the number of constituents andparts of speech, and the role of grammatical units in these combinations is analyzed.

Fixed word combinations are on the spotlight in our language in terms of both content and structure. Nouns and verbs play an important role in the formation of fixed word combinations being in different structures and functions. Of course, the usage frequency of parts of speech in fixed word combinations is different. While considering the Azerbaijani language western group dialects, it becomes clear that the number of verb phrasemes is higher than the other ones. Even though noun phrasemes are less by number, they have richer semantic peculiarities.

An important portion of fixed phrases is phrases whose main element is a verb. Speaking of which, it should be noted that features and structures of verb-phrases depend on the grammatical features of the language.

That is why verb-phrases are different in different dialects. Unlike verbs, nouns are based on the importance of the “essence” in terms of their lexical meanings.

This essence can be manifested by material, ideal, logical and grammatical categories formed through linguistics units. However, action, condition, relationships are expressed in lexical meanings of verbs, and in its center there is a “sign" which is considered a logical category.

All verbs are universal with their own lexical meaning; therefore, every verb with full meaning gets closer to syntagma. Every verb, as a nominative unit, has an onomasiology form. Analysis of action verbs in terms of structure and semantic paradigm showed that some static verbs are a derivative form of action verbs. Fixed verb-phrases are considered an equivalent to verbs according to their functions and carry all lexical and semantic features of verbs.

Key words: Western group dialect and accents, noun phrasemes (phraseology units, phrases), verb phrasemes (phraseology compounds), two-component and multi-component collocations.

One of the linguistics units that have beenb formed and developed through the combination of cogitation and language is fixed-word combinations. Fixed-word combinations represent not only nominative (naming), informative (data) attitude to events and facts, but also personal and emotional reflection. More specifically, fixed-word combinations reflect figurative expression means of the language. We should note that fixed- word combinations being an equivalent to individual words is among controversial issues in the linguistics. There are a lot of fixed-word combinations that, can perfectly replace a word, for example, ba§a du§mok (to understand), qulaq asmaq (to listen), yola du§mok (to depart) etc. However, even though dynamics of the compounds is discerned in most fixed- word combinations, they cannot be substituted by individual words.

Dozens of compounds can be examples of this type. This is a natural phenomenon. Phraseology compounds are readily available in the language, and therefore they are close to vocabulary [2, p. 149] and often overlap. In this sense, the lexical-semantic study of fixed word combinations is among pressing topics in the linguistics. Fixed word combinations are on the spotlight in our language in terms of both content and structure. Nouns and verbs play an important role in the formation of fixed word combinations being in different structures and functions. Of course, the usage frequency of parts of speech in fixed word combinations is different. While considering the Azerbaijani language western group dialects, it becomes clear that the number of verb phrasemes is higher than the other ones. Even though noun phrasemes are less numerous by number, they have richer semantic peculiarities. Let us consider each of them separately “In order to classify phraseological units in terms of meanings and grammatical structures we need to study their lexical, morphological, syntactical peculiarities in a detailed way” [15, p. 27]. Unlike other word combinations, phraseological units are grammatically stable word groups. Therefore, there is a big difference between morphological and syntactical structures of fixed word combinations. According to researchers, this feature is common for agglutinative languages [15, p. 16]. In general, classifying phraseological units according to grammatical structures is not something easy. The reason for this is that phraseological units are integral and unchangeable ones in terms of structure and semantic meaning. “Being semantically integral also limits grammatical independence of phraseological units and makes them grammatically unchangeable” [9, p. 108].

Noun phrasemes in the western group dialects of the Azerbaijani language. The most common type of fixed word combinations are noun phrasemes. Such phrasemes are composed of either nouns or substantivized parts of speech.

“These phrasemes are formed like I, II, III type noun phrasemes, but unlike them these phrasemes are not independent, but stable” [6, p. 269]. Noun phrasemes in the Azerbaijani language are formed in a few different ways. M. Mirzaliyeva has sorted them out this way: 1) adjective+noun; 2) noun+noun; 3) noun+adjective; 4) noun+adverb; 5) those in which the first part is numeral; 6) those which are in a form of a sentence [9, p. 109-113]. M. Mirzaliyeva's model for Oghuz group of theTurkic languages is relevant for the western groups, and we will classify phrasemes of kipchak languages according to those models as well. However, in our view, it is not a good idea to include sentence-form phrasemes to this model as well. We will talk about them separately.

1. Adjective + noun. The western group dialects are rich with such collocations, and they are the main part of phraseology. These types of units differ from other phraseological units in their meanings. Morphological features of adjectives play a significant role in “adjective + noun” model collocations. An adjective can form a phraseological unit in case if it becomes substantivized, and in this case proper nouns act like adjectives. For example, “Nigar qeyrotli” (14, p. 32).

Such phraseological units reflect a person, his ability and habits and natural events.

2. Noun + noun - du§man gopori (Shusha); Fatma nononin hanasi (Jabbrayil); gozunun agi- qarasi; olinin duzu, uzunun suyu; evinin uruzusu; beyninin igalati (Ganja);

3. Noun + adjective. This type of fixed word combinations are divided into several types:

a) noun+simple adjective - konlu tox - a person who is not into anything, especially money; agzi bo§ - a person who cannot keep a secret; dili uzun, qani xaraf, domba goz, igi bo§, ba§i bo§, baxti qara, agli qisa, gonu qalin, gonodon bo§, oyaxdan yungul, oyri ayax, oli kom. in these collocations dependent parts are adjectives (usually derived adjectives) and main parts are III person possessive nouns and they have attributive meanings: agzi bagli, gozlori ya§li, ustu ortulu, qapisi agiq, cibi bo§, govdosi dolu, uroyi kodorli etc. Parts of such collocations become one compound element of a sentence;

b) adjective + noun - Ag torpax - a land which does not give а-crop; ag yagi§ (pouring rain); boz ay - (march) (Shusha); enni yarpax (Shamkir).

4. Numeral + noun: bir gimdik baxdavarnx, bir diqqa boy, min dilli. These collocations are considered phraseological units with numerals carrying adverbial meaning: bir domdo (in one/same pace).

In these models ofnoun collocations dependent parts approach main parts and become dependent and unable to change. However, main parts can be changed by getting suffixes and can be in grammatical relations with other words. In the western group dialects nouns, adjectives, numerals, pronouns and verbal advectives can directly approach nouns; e. g. “Ag torpax”; “bir gimdik baxdavarnx”, “bir diqqa boy”.

5. Noun + adverb - Papaginin igi - (meaning “head”). There are only few examples for this type of fixed word combinations, in such collocations main parts become in three cases of nouns -yonluk, yerlik and gixi§liq.

There are different considerations on subordination relationship between components of noun collocations. There is no doubt that there is a yana§ma (meaning “approach”) relations between components of some substantive combinations ya§il yamac (green slope), uca ginar (high plane)). Only F. Zeynalov noted that the first part of such combinations is In indefinite possessive case: “We should consider the first part of I type attributive noun combinations an indefinite (with-out suffixes) possessive case; e. g. uzun yol (long way)” [13]. In fact, there is no ground for considering the first component an indefinite possessive case. However, they can bring about some doubts since there are different approaches on the relationship between the word in an indefinite possessive case and the one after that. dialect azerbaijan language phraseological semantic

In the previous literature there are not so many different opinions on syntactical relationship between the parties of “the III type noun combinations” (goyun ulduzu (the star of the sky), dunyanin xoritosi (the map of the world)). A. Damirchizadeh [3, p. 197], M. Huseynzadeh [4, p. 3] noted that the main relationship between components of such combinations is uzla§ma (agreement). They choose agreement relationship by considering the second constituent, but some notes show that even though they talked about agreement relationship, did not object to idare (subordinate word-groups where there is a governing element) relations either.

For example, it was not a coincidence that M. Huseynzadeh used the word “main” while talking about attributive noun combinations by saying “the main syntactical relation between parties of the III type attributive noun combinations is agreement” [10, p. 127]. It is clear that the other relation the author indicated is idare. In his grammar book for schools which was published a long ago he stated: “The III type attributive noun combinations are formed through agreement and idare (subordinate wordroups where there is a governing element) relations. These relations are formed with suffixes (possessive and ownership)” [12, p. 25].

Most of scholars who studied this part of the Azerbaijani language, including A. Abdullayev [1, p. 9, 15, 31], R. Khalilov [5, p. 42], H. Mirzazadeh [7, p. 31], Y. Seyidov [11, p. 12-38] and others also noted that there are three kinds of relations- uzla§ma, yana§ma, idaro.

This idea has been widely accepted. Alongside nouns, pronouns and infinite verbs and other parts of speech can also be the first component of such combinations with the possessive suffixes (maralin buynuzu (the horn of the deer), qirmizinin tundu, sonin noyin, oxumagin faydasi (the advantage of studying), agillinin moslohoti (the advice of the wise), oxuyanlarin bozilori, belosinin sozlori etc.). The first constituent being in possessive case shows that there is a governing element.

Fixed verb-phrases in the western group dialects of the Azerbaijani language. An important portion of fixed phrases constitute phrases whose main element is a verb. Speaking of which, it should be noted that features and structures of verb-phrases depend on the grammatical features of the language. That is why verb-phrases are different in different diaiects. Let us first anaiyze lexical and semantic peculiarities of verbs before talking about fixed verbphrases in dialects in question. Unlike verbs, nouns are based on the importance of the “essence” in terms of their lexical meanings.

This essence can be manifested by material, ideal, logical and grammatical categories formed through linguistics units. However, action, condition, relationships are expressed in lexical meanings of verbs, and in its center there is a “sign”, which is considered a logical category. All verbs are universal with their own lexica! meaning; therefore, every verb with full meaning gets closer to syntagma. Therefore, every verb, as a nominative unit has an onomasioiogy form.

The analysis of action verbs in terms of structure and semantic paradigm showed that some static verbs are a derivative form of action verbs. Fixed verb- phrases are considered an equivalent to verbs according to their functions and carry all lexical and semantic features of verbs.

The main portion of fixed word combinations is fixed verb-phrases in the western group dialects. These combinations are very rich with their very different structures. Scholars, who studied grammatical structure of the Azerbaijani language so far, think that the reason for such richness is a variety of grammatical forms of verbs. In our opinion, such variety stems from rich semantics of verbs. M. M. Mirzaliyeva writes “The main feature of phraseological compounds is forming different combinations, and the center of this formation is the meanings that the verb carries. Richness of verb meanings gives more possibilities to join with different words and in this case all other exceptions are eliminated” [8, p. 19-20].

Fixed verb-phrases in the western dialects are divided into two groups:

1. Two-component fixed verb-phrases;

2. Multi-component fixed verb-phrases.

Two-component fixed verb-phrases. As it is seen from their name two-component verb- phrases consist of two components. One of the constituents is absolutely a verb, and the other one can be one of parts of speech. These phrases are divided into three groups respective to the structure of attributive word:

1. Attributive verbal phrasemes - agzina baxmax (to listen/consider one's words), agzini baglamax (to muzzle), agzini yoxiamax (to learn one's opinion), ajigi tutmax (to get angry), ajinnan batmax (to become poor), anqutu gixmax (to lose weight), argac kegmox (to discord), arxa goyurmox (to betray), ara vurmax (to set at variance), ayax gokmok (to trick), ayagina du§mok (to beg), bab golmox (to compiy with), baganagini ayirmax (to fight, to beat), baxti vurmax (to be happy), baxti baglanmax (not to get married), barmax basmax (to engage), barmagina dolamax (to make fun of), ba§ agartmax (to learn, to become a master), ba§ dolandirmax (to make ends meet), ba§ qatmax (to deceive), ba§ yolda§i (wife), ba§a gatmax (to end), ba§a du§mok (to understand), ba§a vurmax (to reproach for service), ba§i gohmox (to experience sth), ba§ini bi§irmok (to deceive), ba§ini bitdomox (to trick, to deceive), ba§ini doldurmax (to trick, to deceive), ba§ina goturmok (Fuz.) (to speak out loud, to shout), ba§ini toylamax (west) (to deceive), bavar elomox (Fuz.), beddam eiomox (Shusha) (to make sb notorious); beyzum eiomox (Aghdam, Ganja, Shusha), bin tutmax (Fuz.); fainnot olmax (Fuz), bogaz acmax (Shusha) (to eat a lot), bogaz eiomox (Fuz) (to make pregnant), bogaz olmax (Fuz) (to get pregnant, to owe), bogaz otarmax (Barda) (to eat), bogaza gotirmok (Fuz) (to be fed up), bozba§ qizdirmax (Ganca) (fo fuel disagreement), dilini surumok; dili topimox (Fuzuli); dili golmomox; dil bulamax (Fuzuli); dil gixartmax (Aghdam); dodagi qagmax (Ganja); dolaf golmox (Aghdam); dov golmox (Aghdam); cama: ayagi (Shusha); can olmax (Fuzuli); can vermok (Ganca); cana yigmax (Aghdam); cani yanmax (Shusha); canina baxmax (Fuzuli); cibrigini gokmox (Fuzuli); cimbat olmax (Aghdam); cib sokmok (Ganja); gapan galmax (Aghdam, Barda); gopor goxmox (Aghdam, Fuzuli); gigoyi girtdamax (Aghdam); giio gixartmax (Aghdam); gomgo tutmax (Aghdam); gomgo olmax (Fuzuli); daban doymox (Fuzuli); dax gokmok (Shusha); daga donmok (Ganja); dalaga golmox (west); dalinnan doymox (west); dan golmox (west); dansixi gixmag (Shusha); daramit virmax (Fuzuli); da§ini atmax (Fuzuli); de§ik axtarmax (Fuzuli) dofi donmox (Shusha); dohno basmax (Fuzuli); ehdivar baglamax (Ganja); eyni agilmax; oi gokmox (Fuz).

1. Two-element fixed verb-phrases whose attributive element is a derived word, arhadara salmax (Barda); gidarri olmax (Ganja); dagaliix elomok (Fuzuli); domxud qalmax (Aghdam); donolgosi donmox (Barda).

2. Two-element fixed verb-phrases whose attributive element is a compound word: - agzigoy- gohliy elomok - to curse; alabogir olmax - to be afraid; alabaydag olmax - to be disgraced; arax- varax elomok - to reveal; atdo§u elomok -; ba§- beynini doldurmax - to persuade, to trick; ba§-goz elomok - to make sb get married; dofo-darox sal- max (Fuzuli); dadamal du§mox (Ganja) - to get into the habit of doing the same action.

Fixed verb-phrases in the western diaiects are divided into following groups according to grammatical forms:

1. Noun in the nominative (common) case + verb: ba§ agartmax; ba§ dolandirmax; ba§ qatmax; ba§ yolda§i; bogaz acmax (Shusha); bogaz elomox (Fuz); bogaz olmax (Fuz); bogaz otarmax (Barda); ori§do kosmox (Jabrayil); fi§ vurmax (Goy-gol); fikir gohmox (Jabrayil, Aghdam); gohgir olmax; gic elomox (Barda); gul vurmax (Jabrayil); gun aglamax (Jabrayil);

2. Noun in the possessive case + verb. We did not stumble across any fixed verb-phrases like this in dialects that were studied.

3. Noun in yonluk case (one of the noun cases in the Azerbaijani language meaning “direction”) + verb: oio aimax (Jabrayil); olo salmax (Fuz); olo vermox (Aghdam); otino-qanina yerihlomox (Jabrayil); fikro getmox (Barda); gozuno basmax (Jabrayil); gozuno durmax (Jabrayil); gozuno kul ufurmox (Aghdam); giro ke§mox (Jabrayil, Fuzuli);

4. Noun in the case of tasirlik + verb: oli getmox (Jabrayil); oli golmox (Jabrayil); oli gotirmox (Jabrayil); oli uzulmox (Jabrayil, Ganja, Goranboy, Shamxor); Firi tutmax (Jabrayil); Fisi yatmax (Jabrayil); gozu baglamax (Fuzuli); gozu du§mox (Jabrayil); gozu qizmax (Ganja); gozu tutmax (Aghdam); gozu tu§mox (Fuzuli);

5. Noun in yerlik case (one of noun cases in the Azerbaijani language meaning “place”) + verb: gozundo qalxmax (Fuzuli); gozundo qoymax; goydo aimax (Aghdam);

6. Noun in chixishlik case (one of noun cases in the Azerbaijani language meaning “from where”) + verb: ol-oyagi yerdon-goydon uzulmok (Jabrayil); oldon-oyaxdan du§mox (Fuz., Jabrayil); oldon saimax (Fuz); bogazdan kosmox (Yevlax).

Multi-component fixed verb-phrases. These compounds are stable to very diverse composition, that is, the composition of the various semantic shades are united around a new meaning to the words: agli yerino golmok; anasinnan omdiyi sudu burnunnan tokmok; ari yeyib namusu dalina atmax; a§ina soyux su qatmax; balamangiya dom tutmax; ba§i da§dan-da§a doymok; ba§i dunux olmax; ba§ina da§ saimax; ba§ina goturmok; ba§ina hava golmok; ba§ina soyux doymok; burun tovu vermok (Aghdam); burnunnan uzagi gormomok (Fuzuli); canina ol qatmax (Aghdam); canim bogaza yigmax (Fuzuli); caninin hayina qalmax (Barda); gim yag igindo uzmox (Aghdam); gulunu sudan quru gixarmax (Aghdam); da§i da§ usto qoymamax (Fuzuli); da§i otoyinnon tokmok (Aghdam); dorisino saman doldurmax (Aghdam); dorisini bogazinnan gixarmax (Aghdam); dordini igori saimax (Fuzuli); dostana qoymax (Aghdam); dimix qalmax (Fuzuli); dirnaxnan otin arasina girmox (Aghdam); di§gan i§ tutmax (Aghdam); di§i bagirsagini kosmok (Shusha); Multicomponent stable verb- phrases: boynuna ip saimax (Aghdam) - to deceive, to make sb get married; boynuna u§ax du§max (Fuz) - to get pregnant; ba§ina hava goimok (Ganja) - to become crazy, to get mad; ba§ina soyux doymok (Barda) - to get angry; bir sozunu iki elomok (Aghdam) - not to listen to sb's words; cin atina minmok (Barda) - to get angry; gatisi bogazina ke§mox (Fuzuli) - to escape from sb; dayman doyirmanina su tohmox - to play into enemy's hands; diziqquluya dom vermok (Fuzuli). The statistical analysis of these compounds showed that sometimes within the collocations are either key or auxiliary component: aglina duz baglamax; agzi qatix kosmomok; agzina gullu doy§an sigmamax; agzina qifil vurmax; agzina qoyut almax; agzini agif gozunu yummax; dili agzina sigmamax (Fuzuli); dili topux galmax (Shusha); dilini i§o salmax (Aghdam); dilinin balasina du§mox (Fuzuli); dilindo tuk bitmok (Shusha); dilindo soz bitif (Ganja); (Aghdam); ol- oyaga du§mok (Jabrayil); ol-oyaxli olmax (Jabrayil); ol-oyagi yerdon- goydon uzulmok (Jabrayil); ol- oyagini bir yero baglamax (Fuz); ol yeri qoymax (Fuz., Ganja). If we look at the examples, we will see that classifying them according to the semantic and grammatical features of the components is challenging.

Interestingly enough, some scholars did divide these verb-phrases into two groups: 1) Phrases that are in a form of a word combination; 2) Phrases that are in a form of a sentence [16, p. 65-75]. From this perspective, we also come across fixed word combinations that are in a form of a sentence: ba§ini soxmaga yer yer axtarmax (Ganja); bugda yeyib cennetden gixmax (Fuzuli); iki gozunu bir de§ihdon gixarmax (Ganja); ilan ogzinnan qurtarmax (Goranboy); gor oyuno saglam ba§ aparmamax (Jabrayil, Fuzuli); oloyi olonib xol- viri goydo oynomax (Fuz). These collocations are still used as a proverb. Despite the potential of verbs in the western group, not all of them take an active part in the formation of stable word combinations Since verbs Individually represent broad lexical-semantic meanings, in spite of them being active, they still take a back seat in stable word combinations and that is why not all of them can become a main element. Of course, verbs, as a main component, take a full advantage of grammatical options within the combinations as well.

References

1. Abdullayev 0. Muasir Azorbaycan dilindo sintaktik olaqolor. ADU no§ri, 1956.

2. Bayramov H. Azorb. dili frazeologiyasinin osaslari. Baki : Maarif, 1978, 176 s.

3. Domirgizado O.M. Azorb. dilinin uslub.. Baki : Azortodrisno§r. 1962, 271 s.

4. Fluseynzado M. Azorbaycan dilinin qrammatikasi. II h., 1959.

5. Xolilov R. Muasir Azorbaycan dilindo II vo III nov to'yini soz birlomolorinin toroflori arasinda sintaktik olaqo usullari. Azorb. SSR AE-nin Moruzolori, XIV cild, 1958.

6. Mohorromova R.J. Mirzo Olokbor Sabirin soz dunyasi. Baki : Nurlan, 2006, 269 s.

7. Mirzozado H. Azorbaycan dilinin tarixi sintaksisi. Baki : Maarif, 1968.

8. Mirzoliyeva M. Turk dillorinin frazeologiyasi. I c. Baki : Nurlan, 2009, 218 s.

9. Mirzoliyeva M. Turk dillorinin frazeologiyasinin nozori problemlori. Baki : gAzorbaycan Ensiklopediyasa, 1995, 108 s.

10. Muasir Azorbaycan dili. Sintaksis / Yuklo Kazimov. 1959. 127 s.

11. H.Seyidov Y. Muasir Azorbaycan dili. Sintaksis. ADU no§ri, 1959.

12. §iroliyev M. Azorbaycan dilinin qrammatikasi: 6-8-ci siniflor ugun dorslik. Baki : Maarif, 1970.

13. Zeynalov F. Turk dillorinin muqayisoli qrammatikasi. 1 h. Baki, 1974.

14. Гусейнов Ф. Г. Фразеологическая валентность лексических единиц. Ученые записки АГУ. Серия языка и литературы. 1966. № 5.

15. Кенесбаев С. К. О некоторых особенностях фразеологических единиц в казахском языке. Известия АН Казахской ССР. Серия филологии и искусствоведения. 1954. Вып. 1-2. С. 6-28.

16. Чернов М. Ф. Глагольные идиоматические сочетания в современном чувашском языке. Советская тюркология. Баку : Коммунист, 1985. С. 65-75.

Анотація

Граматичні та стилістичні особливості комбінацій фіксованих слів у діалектах західної групи азербайджанської мови

Асадова М. Ф.

Статтю присвячено граматичним особливостям фразеологічних одиниць (фраз) у діалектах західної групи азербайджанської мови. За граматичними особливостями фразеологічні одиниці, про які йдеться, поділяються на дві групи: іменникові та дієслівні колокації, як і в традиційній лінгвістиці.

Під час аналізу іменникові та дієслівні колокації класифікуються за кількістю складників і частин мови, аналізується роль граматичних одиниць у цих поєднаннях. Виправлені сполучення слів є в центрі уваги нашої мови як за змістом, так і за структурою.

Іменники та дієслова відіграють важливу роль у формуванні фіксованих словосполучень, що перебувають у різних структурах та функціях. Звичайно, частота використання частин мови у фіксованих словосполученнях різна. Якщо розглядати діалекти західної групи азербайджанської мови, стає зрозумілим, що кількість дієслівних фраз вище, ніж інші. Незважаючи на те, що іменних фраз менше за кількістю, вони мають багатші семантичні особливості.

Важливою частиною фіксованих фраз є фрази, основним елементом яких є дієслово. Говорячи про це, слід зазначити, що особливості та структура дієслівних фраз залежать від граматичних особливостей мови. Ось чому дієслівні словосполучення різні на різних діалектах. На відміну від дієслів, іменники базуються на важливості «сутності» з точки зору їхнього лексичного значення.

Ця сутність може проявлятися матеріальними, ідеальними, логічними та граматичними категоріями, сформованими за допомогою лінгвістичних одиниць. Однак дія, умова, відносини виражаються в лексичних значеннях дієслів, і в його центрі є «знак», який вважається логічною категорією. Усі дієслова універсальні за своїм лексичним значенням, тому кожне дієслово з повним значенням наближається до синтагми. Кожне дієслово як номінативна одиниця має ономасіологічну форму. Аналіз дієслів дії з точки зору структури та семантичної парадигми показав, що деякі статичні дієслова є похідною формою дієслів дії. Фіксовані дієслівні фрази вважаються еквівалентом дієслів за своїми функціями і несуть у собі всі лексичні та семантичні особливості дієслів.

Ключові слова: західний груповий діалект та наголоси, іменні фразеологізми (фразеологічні одиниці, фрази), дієслівні фразеологізми (фразеологічні сполуки), двокомпонентні та багатокомпонентні колокації.

Размещено на Allbest.ru