Эмоциональное отношение к компонентам цифровой среды (на материале текстового анализа комментариев в Сети)

Gregor B., Gotwald B. Perception of artificial intelligence by customers of science centers // Problemy Zarz^dzania (Management Issues). 2021. Vol. 19. No 1. Pp. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.9L2

Horstmann A.C., Bock N., Linhuber E., Szczuka J.M., Strafimann C., Kramer N.C. Do a robot's social skills and its objection discourage interactants from switching the robot off? // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13. No 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201581 Io H.N., Lee C.B. Social media comments about hotel robots // Journal of China Tourism Research. 2020. Vol. 16. No 4. Pp. 606-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2020.1769785 KeijsersM., Bartneck C. Mindless robots get bullied // HRI'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. Pp. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171266 Kelley P.G., Yang Y., Heldreth C., Moessner C., SedleyA., Woodruff A. “Mixture of amazement at the potential of this technology and concern about possible pitfalls”: public sentiment towards AI in 15 countries // IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. 2021. Vol. 44. No 4. Pp. 28-46. Kwon D., Chung M.J., Park J.C., Yoo C.D., Jee E., Park K., Kim Y., Kim H., Park J., Min H., Park J. W., Yun S., Lee K. Emotional exchange of a socially interactive robot // IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2008. Vol. 41. No 2. Pp. 4330-4335. https://doi.org/10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.00729 Lazer D.M.J., Pentland A., Watts D.J., Aral S., Athey S., Contractor N., Freelon D., Gonzalez- Bailon S., King G., Margetts H., Nelson A., SalganikM.J., Strohmaier M., Vespignani A., Wagner C. Computational social science: obstacles and opportunities // Science. 2020. Vol. 369. No 6507. Pp. 1060-1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8170 Li S., Xu L., Yu F., Peng K Does trait loneliness predict rejection of social robots? The role of reduced attributions of unique humanness: exploring the effects of trait loneliness on anthropomorphism and acceptance of social robots // HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. Pp. 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374777 Liu X., Burns A.C., Hou Y. An investigation of brand-related user-generated content on Twitter // Journal of Advertising. 2017. Vol. 46. No 2. Pp. 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273 Lucas H., Poston J., Yocum N., Carlson Z., Feil-Seifer D. Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment // 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Conference Proceedings. IEEE Press, 2016. Pp. 1071-1076. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745241 Malinowska J.K. What does it mean to empathise with a robot? // Minds and Machines. 2021.

Vol. 31. No 3. Pp. 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09558-7 Melo C.D., Carnevale P.J., Gratch J. The effect of expression of anger and happiness in computer agents on negotiations with humans // AAMAS '11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Conference Proceedings. Richland: IFAAMAS, 2011. Vol. 3. Pp. 937-944.

Nadarzynski T., Miles O., Cowie A., Ridge D. Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: a mixed-methods study // Digital Health. 2019. Vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619871808

Naneva S., Gou M.S., Webb T.L., Prescott T.J. A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots // International Journal of Social Robotics. 2020. Vol. 12. No 6. Pp. 1179-1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4 Nass C., Moon Y. Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers // Journal of Social Issues. 2000. Vol. 56. No 1. Pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153 Nicolas S., Wykowska A. The personality of anthropomorphism: how the need for cognition and the need for closure define attitudes and anthropomorphic attributions toward robots // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.106841 Nomura T., Fujita A., Suzuki D., Umemuro H. Development of the multi-dimensional robot attitude scale: constructs of people's attitudes towards domestic robots // Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Conference Proceedings. Cham: Springer, 2015. Vol. 9388. Pp. 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_48

Nomura T., Kanda T., Suzuki T. Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction // AI & Society. 2006. Vol. 20. No 2. Pp. 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7 Nomura T., Kanda T., Suzuki T., Kato, K. Prediction of human behavior inhuman - robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots // IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2008. Vol. 24. No 2. Pp. 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR0.2007.914004

Onnasch L., Roesler E. Anthropomorphizing robots: the effect of framing in human - robot collaboration // Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2019. Vol. 63. No 1. Pp. 1311-1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631209 Ouchchy L., Coin A., Dubljevic V. AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media // AI & Society. 2020. Vol. 35. No 4. Pp. 927-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5

Ray C., Mondada F., Siegwart R.Y. What do people expect from robots? // 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 2008. Pp. 3816-3821. https://doi.org/10.1109/IR0S.2008.4650714 Reeves B., Hancock J., Liu X. Social robots are like real people: first impressions, attributes, and stereotyping of social robots // Technology, Mind, and Behavior. 2020. Vol. 1. No 1. https://doi.org/10.103 7/tmb0000018

RiekL.D., Rabinowitch T., Chakrabarti B., Robinson P. Empathizing with robots: fellow feeling along the anthropomorphic spectrum // 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops: Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 2009. Pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2009.5349423 Rosen J., Lindblom J., Billing E.A., Lamb M. Ethical challenges in the human-robot interaction field // ArXiv. arXiv:2104.09306. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.09306 Rosenthal-von der Putten A.M., Kramer N.C., Hoffmann L., Sobieraj S., Eimler S.C. An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot // International Journal of Social Robotics. 2013. Vol. 5. No 1. Pp. 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8 Ruijten P.A.M., Zhao T. Computers and people alike. Investigating the similarity - attraction paradigm in persuasive technology // Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. PERSUASIVE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Conference Proceedings. Cham: Springer, 2017. Vol. 10171. Pp. 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_11 Save la N., Garcia D., Pellert M., Oksanen A. Emotional talk about robotic technologies on Reddit: sentiment analysis of life domains, motives, and temporal themes // New Media & Society. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211067259 Schmidtler J., Bengler K., Dimeas F., Campeau-Lecours A. A questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices (QUEAD): testing usability and acceptance in physical human - robot interaction // 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC): Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 2017. Pp. 876-881. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8122720

Spatola N., Wudarczyk O. Ascribing emotions to robots: explicit and implicit attribution of emotions and perceived robot anthropomorphism // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106934 Strait M.K., Aguillon C., Contreras V., Garcia N. The public's perception of humanlike robots: online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots // 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 2017. Pp. 1418-1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/R0MAN.2017.8172490 StraitM.K., Contreras V., Vela C.D. Verbal disinhibition towards robots is associated with general antisociality // ArXiv. arXiv:1808.01076. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.01076 Sundar S.S. Rise of machine agency: a framework for studying the psychology of human - AI Interaction (HAII) // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2020. Vol. 25. No 1. Pp. 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

Swaminathan, V., Schwartz, H.A., Menezes, R., & Hill, S. (2022). The language of brands in social media: Using topic modeling on social media conversations to drive brand strategy // Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol. 57. No 2. Pp. 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221088275

Takayama L., Ju W., Nass C. Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do // HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2008. Pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349827 Viik T. Falling in love with robots: a phenomenological study of experiencing technological alterities // Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 2020. Vol. 11. No 1. Pp. 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0005

WangX., Krumhuber E.G. Mind perception of robots varies with their economic versus social function // Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. Vol. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01230 Waytz A., Epley N., Cacioppo J.T. Social cognition unbound: insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2010. Vol. 19. No 1. Pp. 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359302 Wiese E., Metta G., Wykowska A. Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663

Zhang B. Public opinion toward artificial intelligence // OSF Preprints. 2021, October 7. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/284sm

Abstract

Emotional Attitudes towards the Components of the Digital Environment (Based on the Text Analysis of Network Comments)

Yulia M. Kuznetsova

One of the psychological effects of digitalization is the establishment of specific relationships between a person and the cyber environment and its components. The paper presents the results of a study of the emotional component of attitudes towards the components of the digital environment, carried out using emotive-predicate analysis, a new method of computer text processing implemented in TITANIS, an advanced social media text analysis tool. Using this method, it is possible to automatically extract descriptions of emotional situations from texts in which the components of the digital environment are the cause or subject of 68 emotional states. The texts of 2048 online videos posted in the Russian-language segment of YouTube served as the material for the analysis. According to the frequency of occurrence, emotional situations involving various components of the digital environment are quite typical for even thematically irrelevant online discussions. The components of the digital environment mentioned in non-thematic discussions as participants in emotional situations are classified into the following three groups: (1) general concepts of digital technologies; (2) digital devices; (3) activities mediated by digital technologies. The lexemes of the latter group, denoting various aspects of network communication, are included in the vast majority of descriptions of emotional situations involving the components of the digital environment, and six times more often as causes of emotions than as subjects of emotional states. In general, the emotional attitude towards the components of the cyber environment as a whole is characterized as balanced, without a noticeable predominance of negative or positive emotions. However, negative states are more often attributed to the components of the cyber environment as the subjects than as the causes of emotions. The practical significance of the described method of text analysis as a means of assessing the emotional component of attitudes towards the components of the digital environment is determined by the influence that affective reactions of users have on the demand for technical innovations and the direction of their development.

Key words: digital environment, anthropomorphism, TITANIS, emotive-predicate analysis, emotional situation, online discussions

References

Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008- 0001-3

Belyaev, G.Yu. (2020). Social and digital environment as a source of new opportunities and new risks for modern education. Otechestvennaya i Zarubezhnaya Pedagogika, (4(69)), 109-123.

Briggs, G., Gessell, B., Dunlap, M., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Actions speak louder than looks: Does robot appearance affect human reactions to robot protest and distress? The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Conference Proceedings (pp. 1122-1127). Edinburgh: IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926402 Brondi, S., Pivetti, M., Di Battista, S., & Sarrica, M. (2021). What do we expect from robots? Social representations, attitudes and evaluations of robots in daily life. Technology in Society, 66, 101663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101663 Burov, S.P. (2018). Methods for assessing social human-robot interaction. Gumanitarnaya Informatika, (14), 18-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/23046082/14/2 Carroll, J.M. (1997). Human - computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.61 Cave, S., Coughlan, K., & Dihal, K. (2019). “Scary Robots:” Examining public responses to AI. AIES '19: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 331-337). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. http://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314232

Connolly, J., Mocz, V., Salomons, N., Valdez, J., Tsoi, N., Scassellati, B., & Vazquez, M. (2020). Prompting prosocial human interventions in response to robot mistreatment. HR'I '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human -

Robot Interaction (pp. 211-220). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. http://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374781

Doyle-Burke, D., & Haring, K.S. (2020). Robots are moral actors: Unpacking current moral HRI research through a moral foundations lens. Social Robotics: 12th International Conference, ICSR 2020, Golden, CO, USA, November 14-18, 2020, Proceedings (pp. 170-181). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_15 Enikolopov, S.N., Kuznetsova, Y.M., Osipov, G.S., Smirnov, I.V., & Chudova, N.V. (2021). The method of relational-situational analysis of text in psychological research. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(4), 748-769. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-4-748-769 Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.114.4.864

Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. AAAI'17: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 963-969). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.04904 Gao, S., He, L., Chen, Y., Li, D., & Lai, K. (2020). Public perception of artificial intelligence in medical care: Content analysis of social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), e16649. https://doi.org/10.2196/16649 Gimaletdinova, G.K., & Dovtaeva, E.Kh. (2020). Sentiment analysis of the reader's internet commentary on a political text. Political Linguistics, (1), 42-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20-01-05

Goldenberg, A., Garcia, D., Halperin, E., & Gross, J.J. (2020). Collective emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(2), 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901574 Gregor, B., & Gotwald, B. (2021). Perception of artificial intelligence by customers of science centers. Problemy Zarzqdzania (Management Issues), 19(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.9L2

Horstmann, A.C., Bock, N., Linhuber, E., Szczuka, J.M., StraBmann, C., & Kramer, N.C. (2018). Do a robot's social skills and its objection discourage interactants from switching the robot off? PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0201581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201581 Io, H.N., & Lee, C.B. (2020) Social media comments about hotel robots. Journal of China Tourism Research, 16(4), 606-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2020.1769785 Keijsers, M., & Bartneck, C. (2018). Mindless robots get bullied. HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 205-214). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171266 Kelley, P.G., Yang, Y., Heldreth, C., Moessner, C., Sedley, A., & Woodruff, A. (2021). “Mixture of amazement at the potential of this technology and concern about possible pitfalls:” Public sentiment towards AI in 15 countries. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 44(4), 28-46.

Korotkova, V.O., & Lobza, O.V. (2021). Personal determinants of the functioning of mental structures in the digital space. Research Result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 7(4), 59-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-4-0-5 Kwon, D., Chung, M.J., Park, J.C., Yoo, C.D., Jee, E., Park, K., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Park, J., Min, H., Park, J.W., Yun, S., & Lee, K. (2008). Emotional exchange of a socially interactive robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 41(2), 4330-4335. https://doi.org/10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.00729 Lazer, D.M.J., Pentland, A., Watts, D.J., Aral, S., Athey, S., Contractor, N., Freelon, D., Gon- zalez-Bailon, S., King, G., Margetts, H., Nelson, A., Salganik, M.J., Strohmaier, M., Vespignani, A., & Wagner, C. (2020). Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities. Science, 369(6507), 1060-1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8170 Li, S., Xu, L., Yu, F., & Peng, K. (2020). Does trait loneliness predict rejection of social robots? The role of reduced attributions of unique humanness: Exploring the effects of trait loneliness on anthropomorphism and acceptance of social robots. HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human - Robot

Interaction (pp. 271-280). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.n45/3319502.3374777

Liu, X., Burns, A.C., & Hou, Y. (2017). An investigation of brand-related usergenerated content on Twitter. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273 Lucas, H., Poston, J., Yocum, N., Carlson, Z., & Feil-Seifer, D. (2016). Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Conference Proceedings (pp. 1071-1076). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745241 Malinowska, J.K. (2021). What does it mean to empathise with a robot? Minds and Machines, 31(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09558-7 Mdivani, M. (2019). Anthropomorphic trends in the perception of a personal car. Vestnik Samarskoi Gumanitarnoi Akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya, (1), 74-81. (In Russ.) Mdivani, M.O. (2018). Interaction of individual with anthropogenous environment. Social Sciences and Humanities: Theory and Practice, (1), 535-547. (In Russ.)

Melo, C.D., Carnevale, P.J., & Gratch, J. (2011). The effect of expression of anger and happiness in computer agents on negotiations with humans. AAMAS '11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Conference Proceedings (vol. 3, pp. 937-944). Richland: IFAAMAS.

Nadarzynski, T., Miles, O., Cowie, A., & Ridge, D. (2019). Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study. Digital Health, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619871808

Naneva, S., Gou, M.S., Webb, T.L., & Prescott, T.J. (2020). A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(6), 1179-1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4 Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers.

Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153 Nicolas, S., & Wykowska, A. (2021). The personality of anthropomorphism: How the need for cognition and the need for closure define attitudes and anthropomorphic attributions toward robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106841. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.106841

Nomura, T., Fujita, A., Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2015). Development of the multi-dimensional robot attitude scale: Constructs of people's attitudes towards domestic robots. Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Conference Proceedings (vol. 9388, pp. 482-491). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_48 Nomura, T., Kanda, T., & Suzuki, T. (2006). Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human - robot interaction. AI & Society, 20(2), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7 Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2008). Prediction of human behavior inhuman - robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(2), 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR0.2007.914004

Onnasch, L., & Roesler, E. (2019). Anthropomorphizing robots: The effect of framing in human - robot collaboration. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1311-1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631209 Ouchchy, L., Coin, A., & Dubljevic, V. (2020). AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media. AI & Society, 35(4), 927-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5

Panov, V.I., & Patrakov, E.V. (2020). Digitalization of the information environment: Risks, representations, interactions. Moscow: Psychological Institute of RAE Publ.; Kursk: Universitetskaya Kniga Publ. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47581/2020/02.Panov.001 Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R.Y. (2008). What do people expect from robots? 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Conference Proceedings (pp. 3816-3821). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IR0S.2008.4650714

Reeves, B., Hancock, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Social robots are like real people: First impressions, attributes, and stereotyping of social robots. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000018

Riek, L.D., Rabinowitch, T., Chakrabarti, B., & Robinson, P. (2009). Empathizing with robots: Fellow feeling along the anthropomorphic spectrum. 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops: Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2009.5349423 Rosen, J., Lindblom, J., Billing, E., & Lamb, M. (2021). Ethical challenges in the human - robot interaction field. ArXiv. arXiv:2104.09306. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.09306 Rosenthal-von der Ptitten, A.M., Kramer, N.C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S.C. (2013). An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8 Ruijten, P.A.M., & Zhao, T. (2017). Computers and people alike. Investigating the similarity- attraction paradigm in persuasive technology. Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. PERSUASIVE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Conference Proceedings (vol. 10171, pp. 135-147). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_11 Savela, N., Garcia, D., Pellert, M., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Emotional talk about robotic technologies on Reddit: Sentiment analysis of life domains, motives, and temporal themes. New Media & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211067259 Schmidtler, J., Bengler, K., Dimeas, F., & Campeau-Lecours, A. (2017). A questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices (QUEAD): Testing usability and acceptance in physical human-robot interaction. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC): Conference Proceedings (pp. 876-881). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8122720

Shpilnaya, N.N. (2018). The principle of the suppositional connection of the lexeme and the text as a key principle of human-computer communication organization. Kul'tura i Tekst, (4), 209-226. (In Russ.)

Spatola, N., & Wudarczyk, O.A. (2021). Ascribing emotions to robots: Explicit and implicit attribution of emotions and perceived robot anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106934 Stepnova, L.A., Safonova, T.E., & Kostyuk, Ju.A. (2020). Study of students' digital consciousness by the method of semantic differential. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 8(6), 71. (In Russ.)

Strait, M.K., Aguillon, C., Contreras, V., & Garcia, N. (2017). The public's perception of humanlike robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Conference Proceedings (pp. 1418-1423). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172490 Strait, M.K., Contreras, V., & Vela, C.D. (2018). Verbal disinhibition towards robots is associated with general antisociality. ArXiv. arXiv:1808.01076. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.01076 Sundar, S.S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human - AI Interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

Swaminathan, V., Schwartz, H.A., Menezes, R., & Hill, S. (2022). The language of brands in social media: Using topic modeling on social media conversations to drive brand strategy. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(2), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221088275 Takayama, L., Ju, W., & Nass, C. (2008). Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do. HR'I '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 25-32). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349827 Titova, T.A. (2013). Anthropomorphism as a way of mastering reality: Socio-philosophical analysis. Ph.D. in Philosophy Thesis. Kazan: Kazan Federal University. (In Russ.)

Viik, T. (2020). Falling in love with robots: A phenomenological study of experiencing technological alterities. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0005

Wang, X., & Krumhuber, E.G. (2018). Mind perception of robots varies with their economic versus social function. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01230

Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359302

Wiese, E., Metta, G., & Wykowska, A. (2017). Robots as intentional agents: Using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663

Zhang, B. (2021, October 7) Public opinion toward artificial intelligence. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/284sm

Zhuravlev, A.L., & Nestik, T.A. (2016). Psychological aspects of negative attitudes toward new technologies. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 37(6), 5-14. (In Russ.)

Zilberman, N.N. (2019). Social robot in shopping malls: First results, challenges and prospects for researches. Gumanitarnaya Informatika, (16), 34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/23046082/16/5

Zilberman, N.N., Chekunova, A.V., Gladky, D.A., & Kulikov I.A. (2015). Stereotypical children's attitudes about social robot's status-role characteristics. Modern Research of Social Problems, (4), 398-417. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2015-4-36

Размещено на Allbest.ru