Взаимодействие граждан с контрольно-надзорными органами государства: состояние и основные тенденции

32. Xu L., Wu L. Food safety and consumer willingness to pay for certified traceable food in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2010, No. 90 (8). P. 1368-1373.

33. Yuksel Y., Tepe F. Citizen satisfaction with police and community policing // European Scientific Journal. 2013, N 9 (14). P. 1857-7881.

References

34. Gushchina D. G. Problems of legal assessment by the courts of general jurisdiction of the content of responses to citizens' appeals to state and local authorities // Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University [Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. Series: Law. 2015. Vol. 11. N 4. P 90-96. (In rus)

35. Zubarev S. M. New technologies of public control: reality or illusion? // Bulletin of Perm University. Legal sciences [Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki]. 2019. N 43. P 72-93. (In rus)

36. Zyryanov S. M., Kalmykova A. V. Approaches to assessing the effectiveness of control and supervisory bodies to prevent violations of mandatory requirements // Issues of state and municipal administration [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya]. 2019. N 3. P 31-66. (In rus)

37. Ivanova N. V., Petrova S. A. Topical issues of appeal of citizens of the Russian Federation to state authorities // Bulletin of the International Market Institute [Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta rynka]. 2016. N 1. P 127-136. (In rus)

38. Isakov V. B., Glushachenko S. B. Order, peculiarities and problems of citizens' appeal to legal methods and means of the mechanism of state legal protection of their constitutional rights, freedoms and legitimate interests and ways of their resolution, localization // Scientific notes of the St. Petersburg Academy of Management and Economics [Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peter- burgskoi akademii upravleniya i ekonomiki]. 2009. N 3(25). P 63-70. (In rus)

39. Lapin A. E., Borisov N. I. Appeals of citizens as a tool to increase the effectiveness of interaction between the population and the authorities // Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Economics and Law” [Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo»]. 2013. N 1. P 107114. (In rus)

40. Martynov A. V. Prospects for the use of the “regulatory guillotine” mechanism in reforming control and supervisory activities // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Lobachevsky University [Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo]. 2019. N 5. P 143-165. (In rus)

41. Maslennikova E. V., Dobrolyubova E. I., Yuzhakov V. N. Statistics and sociology of the results of control and supervisory activities // Economic policy [Ekonomicheskaya politika]. 2020. Vol. 15. N 1. P 90-107. (In rus)

42. RSPP Monitoring and permitting activities in the Russian Federation. Analytical report 2018. 2019.

43. Rusin S. N. Legal basis of interaction between state authorities, citizens and public associations in the implementation of environmental control (supervision) // Monitoring of law enforcement [Monitoring pravoprimeneniya]. 2014. N 1 (10). P 34-36. (In rus)

44. Shepelev D. V. Problems of increasing the effectiveness of control and supervisory activities in the Russian Federation in the context of the implementation of the functions of the state // Law and state: theory and practice [Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika]. 2019. N 7 (175). P. 57-60. (In rus)

45. Yuzhakov V. N., Dobrolyubova E. I., Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V., Maslennikova E. Assessment of the dynamics of the state's control and supervisory activity from the perspective of citizens as its final beneficiaries. M.: Publishing House “Delo” RANEPA. 2020. 126 p. (In rus)

46. Yuzhakov V. N., Dobrolyubova E. I ., Spyridonov A. A. Methodological approaches to assessing control and supervisory activities from the position of citizens as final beneficiaries // Bulletin of the Russian University of Peoples' Friendship. Series: Sociology [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya]. 2019. N 19 (2). P 337-351. (In rus)

47. Da Cunha D. T, Saccol A. L.F., Tondo E. C., de Oliveira A. B.A. et al. Inspection score and grading system for food services in Brazil: The results of a food safety strategy to reduce the risk of foodborne diseases during the 2014 FIFA World Cup // Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016, 7 (APR).

48. De Vries M. S. Decentralisation: What does it contribute to? The added value of decentralisation for living conditions in core cities of the EU // Public Policy and Administration. 2002, 11 (4). P. 545-562.

49. Forest A., Sheffrin S. M. Complexity and compliance: An empirical investigation // National Tax Journal. 2002, 55 (1). P 75-88.

50. Frolova Y V., Medvedeva N. V., Senicheva L. V., Bondaletov V. V. The security of citizens against criminal offences in modern Russia: Key tendencies and determinants // Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 2015, 9 (3). P. 525-537.

51. Gangl K., Hofmann E., Hartl B., Berkics M. The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: Evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary // Policy Studies. 2020. Vol. 41. P 98-111.

52. Ho A. T.-K., Cho W. Government Communication Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Police Performance: A Large-Scale Survey Study // Public Administration Review. 2017, Vol. 77 (2). P. 228-239.

53. Ma L., Liu P Missing links between regulatory resources and risk concerns: Evidence from the case of food safety in China // Regulation and Governance. 2019, Vol. 13, N 1. P 35-50.

54. Madan M., Nalla M. K. Exploring citizen satisfaction with police in India: The role of procedural justice, police performance, professionalism, and integrity // Policing. 2015, Vol. 38. N 1. P 86-101.

55. Martin S., Downe J. Performance measurement of local public service networks // Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance. 2014, Vol. 3. P 43-64.

56. Martinez L., Short J., Ortiz M. Citizen satisfaction with public goods and government services in the global urban south: A case study of Cali, Colombia // Habitat International. 2015, N 49. P 84-91.

57. Maslov A. Measuring the Performance of the Police: The Perspective of the Public. 2015.

58. Murphy K. Public Satisfaction With Police: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Police-Citizen Encounters // Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology -- AUST N Z J CRIMINOL. 2009, N 42. P 159-178.

59. Nie W., Abler D., Zhu L., Li T, Lin G. Consumer preferences and welfare evaluation under current food inspection measures in China: Evidence from real experiment choice of rice labels // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2018, N 10 (11). P 4003.

60. Nivette A., Akoensi T. Determinants of satisfaction with police in a developing country: a randomised vignette study // Policing and Society. 2019, Vol. 29 (4). P 471-487.

61. OECD (2012) Measuring Regulatory Performance: A Practitioner's Guide to Perception Surveys, OECD Publishing

62. OECD (2017) OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust, OECD Publishing, Paris

63. OECD (2018), OECD Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit, OECD Publishing, Paris

64. Wang Z. Citizens' satisfaction with government performance in six Asian-Pacific giants // Japanese Journal of Political Science. 2010, N 11 (1). P 51-75.

65. Xu L., Wu L. Food safety and consumer willingness to pay for certified traceable food in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2010, N 90 (8). P 1368-1373.

66. Yuksel Y, Tepe F. Citizen satisfaction with police and community policing // European Scientific Journal. 2013, N 9 (14). P 1857-7881.

Об авторах

Южаков Владимир Николаевич, директор Центра технологий государственного управления Института прикладных экономических исследований РАНХиГС (Москва, Российская Федерация), доктор философских наук, профессор;

Добролюбова Елена Игоревна, заместитель директора Центра технологий государственного управления Института прикладных экономических исследований РАНХиГС (Москва, Российская Федерация), кандидат экономических наук;

About the authors

Vladimir N. Yuzhakov, Director of the Center for Public Administration Technologies of the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the RANEPA (Moscow, Russian Federation), Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Professor;

Elena i. Dobrolyubova, Deputy Director of the Center for Public Administration Technologies of the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the RANEPA (Moscow, Russian Federation), PhD in Economics;

Размещено на Allbest.ru