Prospects of legal regulation of relations in the field of artificial intelligence use

At present, there is no unity among scientists regarding the development of the concept of legal regulation of relations in the field of using the achievements of robotics, as well as regarding the place of robots and artificial intelligence in the structure of civil legal relations. The authors of this study support the expediency of the approach to the differentiated determination of the place of robots in the structure of civil relations, according to which robots with artificial intelligence can be both subjects and objects of civil legal relations.

It is proposed to consider artificial intelligence as modelling of the ability to think abstractly, creatively - and especially the ability to learn - using digital computer logic. At the same time, a robot is a device, a machine whose main ability is to automatically perform one or more tasks on the model of human actions, which is described by signs of mobility, sensitivity, analyticity, etc. The study proved that it is artificial intelligence that gives the robot the properties that are usually used to describe it, namely intelligence, the ability to analyse and process information, as well as to perform tasks for which it is programmed.

The concept of «electronic person» can be applied exclusively to robots with certain features conditioned by endowing them with artificial superintelligence, which would indicate their ability to act independently in public relations, and be holders of specific rights and obligations. This demonstrates the primary importance of a differentiated approach to resolving the issue of: a) whether a particular robot can be a subject of legal relations; b) whether by its features it is covered by the concept of «object of civil legal relations» The development and consolidation of a unified approach to the legal regulation of relations in the field of robot operation and artificial intelligence is not appropriate given the complexity of developing universal definitions, such as «artificial intelligence» and «robot», as well as the continuous development of innovative technologies, hence the inability to predict further vectors of movement in the field of robotics and comprehend all the possibilities of its future results, which may jeopardise the effectiveness of all regulations. The study also proved the rationality of a differentiated approach to the legal regulation of legal relations in the field of using specific artificial intelligence systems.

References

robotics artificial intelligence legal

[1] Pozova, D.D. (2017). Prospects for the legal regulation of artificial intelligence under EU law. Casopis Civilistiki, 27, 116-120.

[2] Al-Imam, A., Motyka, M.A., & J^drzejko, M.Z. (2020). Conflicting opinions in connection with digital superintendence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 9 (2), 336-348.

[3] Chang, A.C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: Present state and future vision. Intelligence-Based Medicine, 3-4, Article number 100012.

[4] Hambi, E.M., & Benabbou, F. (2020). A deep learning-based technique for plagiarism detection: A comparative study.

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 9 (1), 81-90.

[5] Benhadj, Y., Messaoudi, M.E., & Nfissi, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: integrating serious gaming into the language class classdojo technology for classroom behavioral management. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 8 (4), 382-390.

[6] Mehdi, B., Hasna, C., Ahmed, E.K., & Tayeb, O. (2019). Intelligent credit scoring system using knowledge management. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 8 (4), 391-398.

[7] Muthukrishnan, N., Maleki, F., Ovens, K., Reinhold, C., Forghani, B., & Forghani, R. (2020). Brief history of artificial intelligence. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 30 (4), 393-399.

[8] Agarkov, M.M. (2002). Selected works on civil law. Moscow: JSC «Center YurInfoR».

[9] Alekseev, S.S. (2001). Climbing to the right. Searches and solutions. Moscow: NORMA.

[10] Borisova, V (2017). Principles of Civil Law. Law Ukraine: Legal Journal, 1, 67-77.

[11] Bratus, S.N. (1950). Subjects of civil law. Moscow: State Publishing House of Legal Literature.

[12] Vasilyeva, V.A. (2017). Regarding the state of modern legislation of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Improvement of the Current Legislation of Ukraine, 43, 12-19.

[13] Venediktov, A.V (1947). On the main problems of Soviet civil law. Bulletin of the Leningrad University, 11, 99-123.

[14] Venediktova, I.V. (2014). Protection of legally protected interests in civil law. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

[15] Vinnyk, O.M. (2018). Legal support of digital economy and electronic business. Kyiv: Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.

[16] Vitruk, N.V. (2008). General theory of the legal status of the individual. Russian Academy of Justice. Moscow: Norma.

[17] Halyantych, M.K. (2003). Industrial property: Legal means of protection and defense. Kyiv: Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.

[18] Hribanov, V.P. (2001). Exercise and protection of civil rights. Moscow: Statut.

[19] Hrynyak, A.B. (2018). Features of contractual regulation of private law relations. Private Law and Entrepreneurship, 18, 121-125.

[20] Dzera, O.V. (2016). Selected. Collection of scientific works. Kyiv School of Civilization. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

[21] Dovhert, A.S. (2000). Codification of private (civil) law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Legal Studies.

[22] Zhylinkova, I.V. (2010). Complex civil legal relations: Concept, structure, features. Law of Ukraine: Legal Journal. Scientific and Practical Professional Publication, SI12, 11-17.

[23] Slipchenko, S., & Zhornokui, Yu. (2019). Personal non-property rights in the national doctrine of civil law. Law of Ukraine, 1, 105-119.

[24] Zaika, Y. (2017). Inheritance law and civilist doctrine. In VLa. Tatsyi, W.E. Butler (Eds.), Ukrainian Legal Doctrine: in 5 volums. Volume 3: Private Law Doctrine of Ukraine. London: Wildy and Sons Limited.

[25] Ioffe, O.S. (2020). Selected works on civil law: From the history of civil thought. Civil legal relationship. Criticism of the theory of «economic law». Moscow: Statut.

[26] Kalaur, I. (2016). The main tasks on the way to reforming the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, 11, 101-105.

[27] Kot, O.O. (2019). Exercise and protection of subjective civil rights. Kharkiv: Pravo.

[28] Kokhanovska, O.V. (2017). Private legal understanding of information relations in Ukraine. Journal of Civilization, 22, 128-133.

[29] Krupchan, O.D., & Luts, VV (Eds.). (2012). Features ofprotection of subjective civil rights. Academicians of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv: Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine.

[30] Kuznietsova, N. (2019). Institution of civil liability in the national and foreign civil law doctrine. Law Ukraine: Legal Journal, 1, 186-197.

[31] Kucherenko, I.M. (2004). Organizational and legal forms of legal entities of private law. Kyiv: IDiP, SE «Legal Publishing House «Asta».

[32] Maydanyk, R.A. (2019). The doctrine of the methodology of private (civil) law of Ukraine. General provisions. Law of Ukraine, 1, 58-74.

[33] Pleniuk, M. (2016). Legal facts in the doctrine of civil law. Jurnalul Juridic National: Teorie §i Practica. S.R.L. Publicate Stiintifico-Practica de Drept, 3, 123-126.

[34] Pohribnyi, S.O. (2009). Mechanism and principles of regulation of contractual relations in civil law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Legal Unity: Alert: CST: CUL.

[35] Prymak, V (2015). New legal models. Legal Ukraine, 1, 84-85.

[36] Romovska, Z.V. (2005). Ukrainian civil law: General part. Kyiv: Attica.

[37] Sibilov, M.M. (2011). On the need to preserve the basic conceptual provisions of the current Civil Code of Ukraine.

University Scientific Notes, 2011, 2, 74-80.

[38] Stefanchuk, R.O. (2008). Personal intangible rights ofindividuals (concept, content, system, features ofimplementation and protection). Kyiv: KNT.

[39] Sukhanov, E.A. (1984). Civil and commercial law of the European socialist countries-members of the CMEA. Moscow: Moscow University Press.

[40] Kharitonov, E.O., & Kharytonova, O.I. (2018). Materials of scientific-practical work on the problem of civil legal personality of robots. In V.M. Furashev, S.O. Dorogykh (Eds.), Internet of things: Problems of legal regulation and implementation (pp. 42-46). Kyiv: KPI named after Ihor Sikorsky.

[41] Shevchenko, Ya.M. (2009). Encyclopedia of civil law of Ukraine. Kyiv: In Yure.

[42] Shershenevych, G.F. (2016). Favorites. Moscow: Statut.

[43] Shymon, S.I. (2017). Construction of «right to law» as a concept of civil law doctrine. Legal Regulation of the Economy: A Collection of Scientific Papers, 16, 171-180.

[44] Yarotskyi, VL. (2010). Characteristics of the main stages of the mechanism of civil law regulation. Law of Ukraine, 12, 18-24.

[45] RoboLaw. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.robolaw.eu.

[46] Kostenko, O.V., & Kostenko, VV (2020). Legal responsibility and identification of subjects and objects with artificial intelligence (IoT). Juridical Science Electronical Journal, 1, 158-162.

[47] Kirchner, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence: basic concepts. La Revue du Praticien, 68 (10), 1143-1144.

[48] Copeland, B.J. (2020). Artificial Intelligent. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial - intelligence.

[49] Filipova, I.A. (2020). Legal regulation of artificial intelligence. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University.

[50] Katkova, T.G. (2017). Robots' legal personality: Fiction or reality? Law and Society. State and Law Development: Issues of Theory and Constitutional Practice, 3 (2), 8-9.

[51] Martsenko, N. (2019). Legal regime of artificial intelligence in civil law. Actual Problems of Jurisprudence, 4 (20), 91-98.

[52] Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratories. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.geminoid.jp/en/index.html.

[53] Calo, R. (2016). Robots in American law. Legal studies research paper No. 2016-04. Seattle: University of Washington School of Law.

[54] Baranov, P.P. (2018). Legal regulation of robotics and artificial intelligence in Russia: Some approaches to solving the problem. North Caucasus Legal Bulletin, 1, 39-45.

[55] Palmerini, E., Bertolini, A., Battaglia, F., Koops, B-J., Carnevale, A., & Salvini, P. (2014). Guidelines on regulating robotics. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322041670_Guidelines_on_Regulating_Robotics.

[56] Report of COMEST on robotics ethics. (2017). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253952_eng.

[57] Baranov, O.A. (2018). Internet of Things (IoT): A robot with artificial intelligence in legal relations. Legal Ukraine, 5-6, 75-95.

[58] Baranov, O.A. (2017). The Internet of Things and artificial intelligence: the origins of the problem of legal regulation. In T.V. Bachynsky, R.I. Radeiko, N.P. Bortnyk (Eds.), IT-Law: Problems and prospects of development in Ukraine (pp. 18-42). Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University.

[59] Ponkin, I.V, & Redkina, A.I. (2018). Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples. Series: Jurisprudence, 22 (1), 91-109.

[60] Kostruba, A.V. (2018). Right deprivation in the legal regulation mechanism of civil property relations. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21 (Special Issue 1), 1-15.

[61] Bezhevets, A.M. (2019). Legal status of robots: problems and prospects for definition. Information and Law, 1 (28), 61-67.

[62] Daus, Y.V, Yudaev, I.V., Taranov, M.A., Voronin, S.M., & Gazalov, VS. (2019). Reducing the costs for consumed electricity through the solar energy utilization. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9 (2), 19-23.

[63] Uzhov, F. (2017). Artificial intelligence as a subject of law. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3, 357-360.

[64] Yavorska, O.H. (2020). Intellectual capital in the era of formation and development of digital economy. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series «Economy», 1 (13), 129-134.

[65] Yastrebov, O.A. (2018). Legal personality of the electronic person: theoretical and methodological approaches. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13 (2), 36-55.

[66] Kravchenko, A. (2020). Mechanism of financial market functioning under conditions of society digitalization. Scientific Horizons, 3 (88), 54-58.

[67] Krivetsky, O. (2018). On the problem of legal regulation of artificial intelligence. Public Opinion on Lawmaking, 15, 15-19.

[68] Aizstrauta, D., & Ginters, E. (2013). Introducing integrated acceptance and sustainability assessment of technologies: A model based on system dynamics simulation. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 145, 23-30.

[69] Aizstrauta, D., Celmina, A., Ginters, E., & Mazza, R. (2013). Validation of integrated acceptance and sustainability assessment methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 26, 33-40.

[70] Innerarity, D. (2020). The intelligence of artificial intelligence. Epistemological considerations. Argumenta Philosophica, 1, 37-50.

[71] Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., Cai, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence recruitment analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1075, 434-442.

[72] Kostruba, A.V. (2018). Law enforcement as a form of realization of right: Phenomenological analysis experience (Civilized aspect). Revista de Derecho Civil, 5 (1), 177-190.

[73] Savchuk, T. (2017). What is known about the humanoid robot Sofia. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda. org/a/28882554.html.

[74] Kravchenko, А. (2018). The essence of the concept of «technical analysis» and methods. Scientific Horizons, 11 (72), 28-32.

Размещено на Allbest.ru