Встановлення адміністративної юрисдикції відносин щодо публічного майна: вплив правового режиму

Забезпечення єдності правових позицій щодо віднесення публічно-правових спорів стосовно публічного майна до адміністративної юрисдикції через. Критерії адміністративної юрисдикції спорів стосовно публічного майна з урахуванням практики Європейського суду.

Рубрика Государство и право
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 28.09.2022
Размер файла 43,4 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

8. Tihomirov, Yu. A. (1995). Publichnoepravo [Public law]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo BEK [in Russian].

9. Tihomirov, Yu. A. (2001). Administrativnoepravo iprocess:polnyjkurs [Administrative Law and Process: Full Course]. Moscow: Izd-o g-na Tihomirova M. Yu. [in Russian].

10. Bevzenko, V. M. (2018). Administratyvna yurysdyktsiia ta Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy u redaktsii 2017 r.: rozviazannia problemy po-novomu chy nepodolani vyklyky mynuloho? [Administrative Jurisdiction and the Code of Administrative Justice of Ukraine in the Wording of 2017: Solving the Problem in a New or Incompressible Challenges to the Past?]. Рravo Ukrainy - Law of Ukraine, 2: Novely Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta problemni aspekty praktyky yikh realizatsii - Novels of the Code of Administrative Justice of Ukraine and Problematic Issues of the Practice of Their Implementation, 11-25 [in Ukrainian].

11. Bevzenko, V. M. (2005). Upravlinnia pryrodno-zapovidnym fondom Ukrainy (orhanizatsiino-pravovi pytannia) [Governance of the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine (Organizational and Legal Issues)]. Kherson: Ailant [in Ukrainian].

12. Harahata, K. O. (2011). Pravova pryroda ta pidvidomchist sporiv shchodo oskarzhennia rishen, dii chy bezdiialnosti subiektiv derzhavnoi reiestratsii mainovykh prav fizychnykh i yurydychnykh osib [Legal nature and jurisdiction of disputes concerning the appeal of decisions, actions or inactivity of entities of state registration of property rights of individuals and legal entitie]. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy - Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, 6, 79-85. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ bmju_2011_6_13 [in Ukrainian].

13. Kuibida, R. (2013). Administratyvnyi dohovir u praktytsi yevropeiskykh krain [Administrative contract in the practice of European countries]. Slovo Natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy - The Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine, 2, 176-183. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/cln_2013_2_24 [in Ukrainian].

14. Lukach, I. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia zasobiv rehuliuiuchoho vplyvu derzhavy na zdiisnennia korporatyvnykh prav [Classification of means of regulatory influence of the state on the exercise of corporate rights]. VisnykKyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky - Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Law Sciences, 93, 46-52. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ VKNU_Yur_2012_93_15 [in Ukrainian].

15. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 143 Konstytutsii Ukrainy, punktiv «a», «b», «c», «g» statti 12 Zemelnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, punktu 1 chastyny pershoi statti 17 Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy vid 01.04.2010. 10-rp/2010 [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional petition of the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine concerning the official interpretation of the provisions of the first part of the Article 143 of the Constitution of Ukraine, points «a», «b», «c», «g» of the Article 12 of the Land Code of Ukraine, paragraph 1 of part one of the Article 17 of the Code of Administrative Legal Proceedings of Ukraine dated April 1, 2010. 10-рп/2010]. (2010). Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ v010p710-10 [in Ukrainian].

16. Pro okremi pytannia yurysdyktsii administratyvnykh sudiv: Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrainy vid 20.05.2013. 8 [On Certain Issues of the Jurisdiction of Administrative Courts Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine dated May 20, 2013. 8]. (2013). Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0008760-13 [in Ukrainian].

17. Ukhvala Hospodarskoho sudu Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti vid 26.12.2011 u spravi 28/5005/17477/2011 [Ruling of the Economic Court of Dnipropetrovsk region dated of December 26, 2011, case no. 28/5005/17477/2011]. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/20269461 [in Ukrainian].

18. Rishennia Hospodarskoho sudu Zakarpatskoi oblasti vid 08.02.2012 u spravi 5008/6/2012 [Decision of the the Economic Court of the Transcarpathian region dated of February 8, 2012, case no. 5008/6/2012]. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/21429862 [in Ukrainian].

19. Pro deiakipytanniayurysdyktsii zahalnykh sudiv ta vyznachenniapidsudnosti tsyvilnykh sprav: Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 01.03.2013. 3 [On Some Issues of the Jurisdiction of General Courts and Definition of Civil Matters]: Resolution of the Plenum of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Consideration of Civil and Criminal Cases dated of March 1, 2013, no. 3]. (2013). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/v0003740-13/print1378843214057257 [in Ukrainian].

20. Perepelytsia, M. (2009). Publichnyi interes yak meta diialnosti subiektiv finansovoho prava [Public Interest as the Goal of the Activity of Subjects of Financial Law]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy - Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 112-119 [in Ukrainian].

21. Banchuk, O. A. (2008). Publichne i pryvatne pravo: istoriia ukrainskykh vchen i su- chasnist [Public and Private Law: History of Ukrainian Doctrines and the Present]. Kyiv: Konus-Iu [in Ukrainian].

22. Zadyraka, N. Yu., & Barikova, A. A. (2014). Mekhanizm rozmezhuvannia pidvidom- chosti zemelnykh sporiv mizh hospodarskymy ta administratyvnymy sudamy [The Mechanism of Delineating the Jurisdiction of Land Disputes between Economic and Administrative Courts]. Administratyvne pravo i protses - Administrative law and process, 1 (7), 148-156 [in Ukrainian].

23. Kryazhnov, A. V. (1999). Publichnyiy interes: ponyatie, vidyi i zaschita [Public Interest: Concept, Types and Protection]. Gosudarstvo i pravo - State and Law, 10, 91-99 [in Russian].

24. European Court of Human Rights (1999). Case «Yonghong v. Portugal»: decision of the European Court of Human Rights dated of November 25, 1999. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search. aspx?i=001-5646# {«itemid»: [«001- 5646»]}.1-61886»]}.

25. European Court of Human Rights (2004). Case «Ila^cu and others v. Moldova and Russia»: decision of the European Court of Human Rights dated of July 8, 2004. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search. aspx?i=001-61886# {«itemid»: [«001-61886»]}.

26. European Court of Human Rights (1998). Case «Affaire Parti Communiste Unifie de Turquie et autres c. Turquie»: decision of the European Court of Human Rights dated of January 30, 1998. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search. aspx?i=001-62691# {«itemid»: [«001-62691»]} [in French].

27. Minka, T. P. (2012). Ontolohichna kharakterystyka pravovoho rezhymu [Ontological Characteristic of the Legal Regime]. Pravo i suspilstvo - Law and Society, 3, 123-127 [in Ukrainian].

28. Balamush, M. A. (2017).Mihratsiinyi rezhym v Ukraini [Migration Regime in Ukraine] (PhD thesis). Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].

29. Popovchuk, S. K. (2013). Administratyvno-pravovi rezhymy v teorii administratyvno- ho prava ta praktytsi diialnosti pravookhoronnykh orhaniv [Administrative Legal Regimes in Theory of Administrative Law and Practice of Law Enforcement Agencies] (PhD thesis). Lviv University of Business and Law, Lviv [in Ukrainian].

30. Holovko, L. O. (2012). Pravo korporatyvnoi vlasnosti v protsesakh suspilnoi transfor- matsii v Ukraini [The Law of Corporate Ownership in the Processes of Social Transformation in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr NUBiP Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

31. Alekseev, S. S. (1989). Obshhie dozvolenija i obshhie zaprety v sovetskom prave [General Permissions and General Prohibitions in Soviet Law]. Moskva: Yurid. lit. [in Russian].

32. Sukhonos, V. V. (2005). Teoriia derzhavy i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Sumy: VTD «Universytetska knyha» [in Ukrainian].

33. Haidamaka, I. O. (2008). Pravovyi rezhym: poniattia ta vydy [Legal Regime: Concepts and Types]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia - Public Construction and Local Self-Government, 15, 120-127 [in Ukrainian].

34. Dyugi, L. (1908). Konstitutsionnoe pravo: obschaya teoriya gosudarstva [Constitutional Law: General State Theory]. Moskva: Izdanie T-va I. D. Syitina [in Russian].

35. Smelianets, H. Ye. (2005). Pravovyi i derzhavnyi rezhymy: poniattia i spivvidnoshen- nia [Legal and State Regimes: Concept and Relation]. Aktualniproblemy derzhavy i prava - Actual problems of state and law, 24, 283-286 [in Ukrainian].

36. Patsurkivskyi, Yu. (2013) Pravovyi rezhym vlasnosti: poniattia ta zmist [Legal Regime of Property: Concept and Content]. Teoriia ipraktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti - Theory and practice of intellectual property, 6, 3-9 [in Ukrainian].

37. Isakov, V. B. (1980). Fakticheskiy sostav v mehanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya [Factual Composition in the Mechanism of Legal Regulation]. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta [in Russian].

38. Sokoliuk, Z. (2005). Teoriia politsii [Police Theory]. Hadyach: Vydavnytstvo «Hady- ach» [in Ukrainian].

39. Zavhorodnia, V. M. (2012). Poniattia «administratyvno-pravovyi rezhym» u poniati- inomu aparati administratyvnoho prava [The Notion of «Administrative Legal Regime» in the Conceptual Apparatus of Administrative Law]. Pravovyi visnyk Ukrainskoi akademii bankivskoi spravy - Legal Gazette of the Ukrainian Academy of Banking, 1 (6), 31-35 [in Ukrainian].

40. Semenikhin, I. V. (2009) Pravova doktryna: poniattia ta osoblyvosti [Legal Doctrine: Concept and Peculiarities]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia - Public Construction and Local Self-Government, 18, 127-139 [in Ukrainian].

41. Tolstenko, V. L. (2014). Derzhavno-pravovyi rezhym i yoho rol u vyznachenni formy derzhavy [State Legal Regime and Its Role in Determining the State Form]. Naukovi pratsiMAUP - Scientific works of MAUP, 1, 115-121 [in Ukrainian].

42. Bahrah, D. N., Rossinskij, B. V., & Starilov, Ju. N. (2007). Administrativnoe pravo [Administrative Law]. 3-d ed. Moskva: Norma [in Russian].

43. Vedel, Zh. (1973). Administrativnoe pravo Francii [French Administrative Law]. Moskva: Progress [in Russian].

44. Kivalov, S. V., & Bila, L. R. (2002). Administratyvnepravo Ukrainy [Administrative Law of Ukraine]. 2-nd ed. Odesa: Yuryd. lit. [in Ukrainian].

45. Averianov, V. B. (Ed.). (2004). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs [Administrative Law of Ukraine. Academic Course]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Yury- dychna dumka» [in Ukrainian].

46. Krestyaninov, A. A. (1999). Mesto tamozhennyh rezhimov v sisteme administrativno- pravovyh rezhimov [Place of Customs Regimes in the System of Administrative Legal Regimes]. Problemi zakonnosti - Problems of legality, 37, 90-96 [in Russian].

47. Keliher, M. (2016). Li as Administrative Law: Political Stratification and the Construction of Qing Administrative Order in Seventeenth-Century China. Fudan Law Review, 3, 84-114.

48. Hofmann, H. (2008). Mapping the European Administrative Space. West European Politics, 31, 1-27.

49. Torma, A. (2011). The European administrative space (EAS). European Integration Studies, 9 (1), 149-161.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.