Международное сотрудничество в борьбе с киберпреступностью в контексте противодействия новым вызовам и угрозам

Рассмотрение формальных и неформальных мер международного сотрудничества, предпринимаемых в ответ на проблему транснациональной киберпреступности. Определение и характеристика различных форм международного сотрудничества в борьбе с преступностью.

Рубрика Государство и право
Вид статья
Язык русский
Дата добавления 12.07.2023
Размер файла 51,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

22. Megret, Frederic. 2020. “Do not do abroad what you would not do at home?: An exploration of the rationales for extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction over a state's nationals”. Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Annuaire canadien de droit international 57: 1-40.

23. Peterson, Zachary N. J., Mark Gondree, Robert Beverly. 2011. “A position on data sovereignty: The importance of geolocating data in the cloud”. HotCloud: Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX conference of Hot topic in Cloud computing. ResearchGate. Дата обращения 1 мая, 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/236626434_A_Position_Paper_on_Data_Sovereignty_The_Importance_of_Geolocat- ing_Data_in_the_Cloud.pdf.

24. Plachta, Michal. 1989. “The role of double criminality in international cooperation in penal matters”. Double Criminality Studies in International Criminal Law. Ed. by Nils Jareborg, 84-134. Uppsala: Iustus Forlag.

25. Ring, Tim. 2021. “Europol: The Al hacker threat to biometrics”. Biometric Technology Today 2: 9-11.

26. Schomburg, Wolfgang, Otto Lagodny. 2020. Internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (International Cooperation in Criminal Matters). Kommentar. 6., vollig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Munchen: C. H. Beck.

27. Sieber, Ulrich. 2012. Straftaten und Strafverfolgung im Internet. Gutachten C zum 69. Deutschen Juristentag. Munich: C. H. Beck.

28. Soler, Christopher. 2019. “Aut dedere aut judicare”. The global prosecution of core crimes under international law, 319-401. The Hague: T. M. C., Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_13.

29. Vermeulen, Gert, Wendy De Bondt, Charlotte Ryckman, eds. 2012. Rethinking international cooperation in criminal matters in the EU. Moving beyond actors, bringing logic back, footed in reality. Antwerpen, Apeldoorn: Portland Maklu.

30. Zaj^c, Dominik. 2020. “Criminal jurisdiction over the Internet: Jurisdictional links in the cyber era”. Cambridge Law Review 4 (2): 1-28.

References

1. Abraha, Halefom. 2020. “Regulating law enforcement access to electronic evidence across borders: The United States approach”. Information & Communications Technology Law 29: 1-30.

2. Bassiouni, Cherif M. 2014. International extradition: United States law and practice. 6th rev. ed. New York, Oxford University Press.

3. Benson, Karyn, Rafael Dowsley, Hovav Shacham. 2011. “Do you know where cloud files are?” Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Cloud Computing Security, 73-82. New York, Association for Computing Machinery.

4. Broadhurst, Roderic, Peter Grabosky, Mamoun Alazab, Steve Chon. 2014. “Organizations and cyber crime: An analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cyber crime”. International of Journal of Cyber Criminology 8 (1): 1-20.

5. Currie, Robert J. 2000. “Human rights and international mutual legal assistance: Resolving the tension” Criminal Law Forum 11 (2): 143-181.

6. Ferzan, Kimberly. 2020. “The reach of the realm. Criminal law”. Philosophy 14: 335-345. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11572-020-09541-w.

7. Galbraith, Jean. 2018. “Congress enacts the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, reshaping U. S. law governing cross-border access to data”. American Journal of International Law 112 (3): 486-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.61.

8. Goldfoot, Josh. 2011. “Compelling online providers to produce evidence under ECPA”. The United States Attorneys Bulletin (Obtaining and Admitting Electronic Evidence) 59 (6): 35-41.

9. Grant, Christensen. 2019. “The extraterritorial reach of tribal court criminal jurisdiction”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 46 (294): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3231533.

10. Klevtsov, Kirill K. 2018. Pre-trial proceedings against persons evading criminal responsibility outside the territory of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ. (In Russian)

11. Kunev, Denis A. 2019. “Countering the movement of criminal assets abroad and their return to the Russian Federation: Criminal procedural aspects”. PhD diss., Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi institut mezhdun- arodnykh otnoshenii (universitet) MID RF. (In Russian)

12. Litvishko, Petr A. 2011. “Issues of procedural independence of the bodies of preliminary investigation of the Russian Federation in the implementation of international cooperation”. Rossiiskii sledovatel' 18: 13-18. (In Russian)

13. Litvishko, Petr A. 2015. “Integration of preliminary investigation and search operations: Foreign and international experience”. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal 3: 309-319. (In Russian)

14. Maillart, Jean-Baptiste. 2019. “The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime”. ERA Forum 19: 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0527-2.

15. Malov, Aleksandr. 2018. “Obtaining electronic evidence from foreign jurisdictions (for example, USA)”. Zakonnost' 9: 56-60. (In Russian)

16. Megret, Frederic. 2020. “Do not do abroad what you would not do at home?: An exploration of the rationales for extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction over a state's nationals”. Canadian Yearbook of international Law / Annuaire canadien de droit international 57: 1-40.

17. Nurbekov, Iskender M. 2011. “Forensic aspects of interaction with foreign competent authorities in the investigation of crimes of an international nature”. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal 1: 117-129. (In Russian)

18. Peterson, Zachary N. J., Mark Gondree, Robert Beverly. 2011. “A position on data sovereignty: The importance of geolocating data in the cloud”. HotCloud: Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX conference of Hot topic in Cloud computing. ResearchGate. Accessed May 1, 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/236626434_A_Position_Paper_on_Data_Sovereignty_The_Importance_of_Geolocat- ing_Data_in_the_Cloud.pdf.

19. Plachta, Michal. 1989. “The role of double criminality in international cooperation in penal matters”. Double Criminality Studies in International Criminal Law. Ed. by Nils Jareborg, 84-134. Uppsala, Iustus Forlag.

20. Ring, Tim. 2021. “Europol: The Al hacker threat to biometrics”. Biometric Technology Today 2: 9-11.

21. Schomburg, Wolfgang, Otto Lagodny. 2020. Internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (International Cooperation in Criminal Matters). Kommentar. 6., vollig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Munchen, C. H. Beck.

22. Shatalov, Alekasandr S. 2015. “Legal mechanism for cooperation in the field of criminal justice”. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki 1: 126-149. (In Russian)

23. Shcherba, Sergei P. 2016. “International cooperation of Russia in the field of extradition for criminal prosecution based on the principle of reciprocity”. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaia iustitsiia 4: 3-8. (In Russian)

24. Sieber, Ulrich. 2012. Straftaten und Strafverfolgung im Internet. Gutachten C zum 69. Deutschen Juristentag. Munich, C. H. Beck.

25. Soler, Christopher. 2019. “Aut Dedere Aut Judicare”. The global prosecution of core crimes under international law, 319-401. The Hague, T. M. C., Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_13.

26. Vermeulen, Gert, Wendy De Bondt, Charlotte Ryckman, eds. 2012. Rethinking international cooperation in criminal matters in the EU. Moving beyond actors, bringing logic back, footed in reality. Antwerpen, Apeldoorn, Portland Maklu.

27. Volevodz, Aleksandr G. 2014. International criminal justice and human rights. Moscow, Rossiiskii universitet druzhby narodov Publ. (In Russian)

28. Volevodz, Aleksandr G. 2016. “Some aspects of investigation planning in international cooperation in criminal matters”. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo 3: 26-33. (In Russian)

29. Zajqc, Dominik. 2020. “Criminal jurisdiction over the Internet: Jurisdictional links in the cyber era”. Cambridge Law Review 4 (2): 1-28.

30. Zhubrin, Roman V. 2018. “Deadlines for the execution of requests for legal assistance in criminal matters”. Zakonnost' 5: 12-14. (In Russian)

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.