Проблеми нормативного регулювання слідчих (розшукових) дій, спрямованих на перевірку й уточнення відомостей, одержаних під час досудового розслідування

З'ясування сутності "слідчого експерименту", її правового змісту, встановлення видів, проведення розмежування зі схожими слідчими діями, вирішення питання про доцільність повернення до кримінального права відтворення обстановки і обставин події.

Рубрика Государство и право
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 24.01.2024
Размер файла 81,8 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

11. Chernetsky, O.K. (2008). Investigative experiment: concept and stages of development. Problems of Legality, 96, 246-252.

12. Balitskyy, Т.М. (2013). The emergence and development of the idea of an investigative experiment. International Humanitarian University Herald. Jurisprudence, № 6-3, vol. 2, 104-105.

13. Balitskyy, Т.М. (2015). Investigative experiment in system of investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings of Ukraine. PhD Thesis. Irpin: National University of State Tax Service of Ukraine.

14. Valchyshyn, G. (2017). Establishment of an investigative experiment as an independent investigative (detective) action. Bulletin of the Chernivtsi Faculty of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", 3, 127-137.

15. Hroshvyi, Yu.M., & Kaplina, O.V. (Eds.). (2010). Criminal procedure. Kharkiv: Pravo.

16. Shepitko, V.Yu. (2015). Criminalistics: Сourse of Lectures (2nd ed.). Kharkiv: Odissey.

17. Kolmakov, V.P. (Ed.). (1973). Soviet criminalistics. Criminalistics techniques and investigative tactics. Kyiv: Vyshcha shchkola.

18. Bazhavnov, M.I., & Hroshvyi, Yu.M. (Eds.). (1983). Soviet Criminal Process. Kyiv: Vyshcha shchkola.

19. Mykheienko, M.M., Nor, V.T., & Shybiko, V.P. (1992). Criminal process of Ukraine. Kyiv: Lybid.

20. Alenyn, Yu.P. (2002). Procedural features of the production of investigative actions. Odessa: Tsentralno-ukraynskoe yzdatelstvo.

21. Shepitko, V.Yu. (2010). Selected Works. Kharkiv: Vydavnycha ahentsiia "Apotil".

22. Criminalistics. (1998). Kharkiv: Pravo.

23. Arotsker, L.E. (1951). Investigative experiment in Soviet criminalistics. PhD Thesis. Kharkiv: Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute. Harkiv.

24. Saltevskyi, M.V. Criminalistics. Kyiv: "Pravnyk", 1996.

25. Zaiats, D.D. (2004). A situational approach to the tactics of checking evidence on the spot. PhD Thesis. Kharkiv: Natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnykh sprav.

26. Kaliuzhna, L.Ye. (2007). To the question of the essence, task and purpose of checking the testimony on the spot. Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine, 3, 116-119.

27. Desk book of the investigator. (2007). Kyiv: Vydavnychii Dim "In Yure".

28. Chernetskyi, O.K., & Reutskyi, A.V. (2012). Peculiarities of demarcation of investigative experiment and verification of readings on the spot. University Scientific Notes, 3(43), 355-359.

29. Nehrebetskyi, V. (2019). Legislative regulation of on-site testimony verification as an increase in the effectiveness of the fight against crime. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 5, 308-312.

30. Hora, I.V., & Kolesnyk, V.A. (2012). Investigative experiment or verification of a person's testimony. Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. Didorenko, 3, 248-256.

31. Dunaevska, L., & Pylypchuk, O. (2018). Verification of testimonies on a place as type of investigative experiment. Herald of Criminal Justice, 4, 24-34.

32. Chaplynska, Yu.A. (2014). Problematic questions of an investigative experiment. Law and Society, 1, 249-254.

33. Rohatynska, N. (2016). Some features of conducting an investigative experiment in criminal proceedings. Actual problems of jurisprudence, 2, 149-153.

34. Komissarchuk, Yu.A., & Riashko, O.V. (2014). Grounds and procedural procedure for conducting an investigative experiment. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 248-260.

35. Busel, V.T. (Ed.). (2004). A large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. Kyiv; Irpin: Peryn.

36. Kaplina, O.V. (2020). Problems of direct study of the results of nonverbal and mixed investigative (detective) actions by the court. Problems of Legality, 151, 101119. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.151.215054.

37. Kaplina, O.V., & Shylo, O.H. (Eds.). (2018). Criminal process. Kharkiv: Pravo.

38. Valchyshyn, H. (2018). Modern understanding of the investigative experiment: domestic and foreign views. Kherson State University Herald. Series: Legal Sciences, 2, 7-10.

39. Nehrebetskyi, V. (2015). Checking the testimony on the spot is a necessary investigative (search) action. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 2, 70-73.

40. Constitution of Ukraine. (June 28, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

41. Resolution of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court 09.14.2020, case No. 740/3597/17, proceedings No. 51-6070kmo19. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91702552.

42. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2004). Project. Table of edits. Part 1. Kyiv: Aparat Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy.

43. Nehrebetskyi, V. (2017). Legislative regulation of on-site testimony verification as a condition for the effectiveness of the fight against crime. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 4, 175-178.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.