Виконання рішення суду як один із елементів права на справедливий суд

2. Pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [On the protection of human rights and fundamental

freedoms]. Konventsiia ratyfikovana Zakonom (No. 475/97-VR vid 17.07.1997). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995 004#Text (in Ukr.).

3. Matat, Yu. I. (2016). Pravo na spravedlyvyi sud: praktyka Yevropeiskoho Sudu z prav liudyny i reabilitatsi-

ia v Ukraini [The right to a fair trial: the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and rehabilitation in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, Seriia Pravo, 41(1), 31-36 (in Ukr.).

4. Shchorichna dopovid Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny pro stan doderzhannia

ta zakhystu prav i svobod liudyny i hromadianyna 2015 [Annual report of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on the state of observance and protection of human and citizen rights and freedoms 2015].

https://miniust.gov.ua/files/general/2016/02/08/201602080000005060.pdf (in Ukr.).

5. Huivan, P. (2017). Znachennia temporalnykh chynnykiv u praktytsi Yevropeiskoho Sudu z prav liudyny.

Svoiechasnist vykonannia sudovoho rishennia - oboviazkiv element pravovoi idei shchodo rozumnoho stroku rozghliadu spravy [The importance of temporal factors in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The timeliness of execution of a court decision is an element of the legal idea of a reasonable time for consideration of a case. Part 5]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, (10), 26-31 http://pgp-iournal.kiev.ua/archive/2017/10/6.pdf (in Ukr.).

6. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Verkhovnoho Sudu

Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen chastyn somoi, deviatoi, punktu 2 chastyny shistnadtsiatoi statti 236-8 Kryminalno-protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding the conformity with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the provisions of parts seven, nine, point 2 of part sixteen of Article 236-8 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. (30.06.2009 No. 16-rp/2009). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v016p710-09#Text (in Ukr.).

7. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym zvernenniam hromadianyna

Shapovalova Oleksiia Leonidovycha shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhen punktu 20 chastyny pershoi statti 106, chastyny pershoi statti 111-13 Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy u vzaiemozviazku z polozhenniamy punktiv 2, 8 chastyny tretoi statti 129 Konstytutsii Ukrainy [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional appeal of the citizen Shapovalov Oleksiy Leonidovych regarding the official interpretation of the provisions of clause 20 of the first part of article 106, of the first part of article 111-13 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine in relation to the provisions of clauses 2, 8 of the third part of article 129 Constitution of Ukraine]. (25.04.2012 No. 11-rp/2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v011p710- 12#Text (in Ukr.).

8. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu Khlipalskoi Viry Vasylivny

shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen chastyny druhoi statti 26 Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro vykonavche provadzhennia" (shchodo zabezpechennia derzhavoiu vykonannia sudovoho rishennia) [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional complaint of Vira Vasylivna Khlipalska regarding the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the provisions of the second part of Article 26 of the Law of Ukraine "On Executive Proceedings" (regarding state enforcement of the court decision)]. (15.05.2019 No. 2-r(II)/2019). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/!aws/show/v002p710- 19#Text (in Ukr.).

9. Leshchenko, A. Pravo na spravedlyvyi sudovyi rozghliad u spravakh pro kolaboratsionizm: yak yoho zab-

ezpechyty v Ukraini [The right to a fair trial in cases of collaborationist!: how to ensure it in Ukraine]. https://www.helsinki.org.ua/articles/pravo-na-spravedlvwv-sudowv-rozghliad-u-spravakh-pro-

kolaboratsionizm-iak-voho-zabezpechvtv-v-ukraini/ (in Ukr.).

10. Pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [On the protection of human rights and fundamen

tal freedoms]. Konventsiia ratyfikovana Zakonom (No. 475/97-VR vid 17.07.1997). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995 004#Text (in Ukr.).

11. Kucher, V. O., Parasiuk, V. M., & Boryslavskyi, R. A. (2023). Pravova pryrodi zakhodiv protsesualnoho

prymusu v tsyvilnomu protsesi [Legal nature of measures of procedural coercion in civil proceedings]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna, (2), 10-16 (in Ukr.).

12. Kiriiak, O. V. (2019). Nedoliky normatyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia prymusovoho vykonannia sudovykh

rishen u tsyvilnykh spravakh, poviazanykh z korporatyzatsiieiu pidpryiemstv [Deficiencies of regulatory regulation of enforcement of court decisions in civil cases related to the corporatization of enterprises]. In: Aktualniproblemy vykonavchoho protsesu: teoriia ipraktyka: Zbirnyk materialiv IV Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Kyiv (s. 127-130) (in Ukr.).

13. Komarov, V. V. (2002). Aktualny problemy reformy hrazhdanskoho protsessualnoho y arbytrazhnoho

protsessualnoho zakonodatelstva Ukrayny: In: Boguslavskiy, M. M., & Trunok, A. (Reds.). SNG: reforma hrazhdanskoho protsessualnoho prava [Current problems of reform of civil procedural and arbitration procedural legislation of Ukraine]. Materyali Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsyy. M.: OOO "Horodets" (s. 85) (in Ukr.).

14. Case of Fyodorov and Fyodorova v. Ukraine (Application no. 39229/03): Judgment, 7 July 2011; Final

07/10/2011 / The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-105478

15. Honcharenko, V. H., Nor, V. T., & Shumylo, M. YE. (Reds.). (2012). Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks

Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. K.: Yustinian (in Ukr.).

16. Bobryk, V. I. (2014). Zakhody protsesualnoho prymusu: porivnialno-pravovyi analiz u riznykh vydakh

tsyvilistychnoho sudochynstva [Measures of procedural coercion: comparative legal analysis in different types of justice] Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, (10), 16-21 (in Ukr.).

17. Lukina, I. M. (2011). Tsyvilna protsesualna vidpovidalnist [Civil procedural responsibility]. Extended ab

stract of candidate's thesis (12.00.03). Kharkiv (in Ukr.).

18. Ihnatsevych, Yu. H., & Nechyporuk, Yu. M. (2017). Vydalennia iz zaly sudovoho zasidannia yak zakhid

protsesualnoho prymusu v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi [Removal from the courtroom as a measure

of procedural coercion in administrative proceedings Removal from the courtroom as a measure of procedural coercion in administrative proceedings]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho univer- sytetu. Seriia "Pravo", 47(2), 115-118 (in Ukr.).

19. Dzhafarova, M. (2019). Zahalna kharakterystyka zakhodiv protsesualnoho prymusu, yaki zastosovuiutsia

v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi [General characteristics of procedural coercion measures used in administrative proceedings]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo ipravo, (3), 143-147 (in Ukr.).

20. Kutsyk, K. (2017). Zakhody protsesualnoho prymusu, yaki zastosovuiutsia do porushnykiv poriadku v zali

sudovoho zasidannia [Procedural coercion measures applied to violators of order in the courtroom]. Pidpryiemstvo, hospodarstvo ipravo, (4), 19-23 (in Ukr.).

21. Malenko, O. V. (2022). Udoskonalennia poriadku zdiisnennia sudovoho rozghliadu kryminalnoho prova-

dzhennia bez uchasti obvynuvachenoho u zviazku z yoho vydalenniam iz zalu sudovoho zasidannia [Improvement of the procedure for the trial of criminal proceedings without the participation of the accused in connection with his removal from the courtroom]. Kyivskyi chasopys prava, (2), 159-167 (in Ukr.).

22. Bilokin, R. M. (2016). Problemni pytannia zastosuvannia vydalennia iz zaly sudu porushnykiv poriadku

sudovoho zasidannia [Problematic issues of the application of removal from the courtroom of violators of the order of the court session]. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk, (5), 105-109 (in Ukr.).

23. Alder, J. (2000). Dissents in Courts of Last Respect: Tragic Choices? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,

(20), 15-90.

24. Barry, D. D. (2001). Decision-Making and Dissent in the Constitutional Court. International and National

Law in Eastern Europe. Feldbrugge, 1-17.

25. Jacobson, A. J. (2015). Publishing Dissent. Washington & Lee Law Review, (62), 1609.

26. Kiriiak, O. V. (2017). Ohliadovyi analiz rozvytku tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho prava okremykh inozemnykh

derzhav [Overview analysis of the development of civil procedural law of certain foreign countries]. Pryvatne ta publichne pravo, (1), 19-23 (in Ukr.).

Размещено на Allbest.ru