Ситуационный подход к анализу и оценке организационных структур управления образованием

18. Швецова Г.Н. Программно-целевое управление региональной образовательной системой // Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора педагогических наук. - Чебоксары, 2009.

19. Щербина В.В. Средства социологической диагностики в системе управления. - М., 1993.

20. Al-Alawi A., Abdulmohsen M., Al-Malki F., Mehrotra A. Investigating the barriers to change management in public sector educational institutions // International Journal of Educational Management. 2019. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 112-148.

21. Alemu D., Shea D. A path analysis of diagnosis of organizational levels of functionality: Implications to educational organizations // International Journal of Educational Management. 2019. Vol. 33. No. 7. P. 1515-1525.

22. Ansoff H.I. Strategic Management. John Wiley, N.Y. 1979.

23. Champoux J.E. Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. Routledge, N.Y. 2011.

24. Gaur A.S. Changing demands of leadership in new economy: a survey of Indian leaders // IIMB Management Review. 2006. Vol. 18. P. 149-158.

25. Greenberg J. Behavior in Organizations. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2011.

26. Nuruzzaman N., Gaur A.S., Sambharya R. A micro-foundations approach to studying innovation in multinational subsidiaries // Global Strategy Journal. 2018. URL: https://ssrn. com/abstract=3069857 (дата обращения: 24.02.2020).

27. Richardson S., Nwankwo S., Richardson B. Strategic issues for higher education strategists in the UK: a political contingency perspective // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 1995. Vol. 8. No. 6. P. 7-16.

28. Urbanovic J., Navickaite J., Daciulyte R. Autonomy, Collaboration and Competition: The Impact of Education Management Reforms which Aim to Increase School Autonomy on Relations between Schools // The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 175-197.

SITUATIONAL APPROACH TO ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES OF EDUCATION AUTHORITIES

Lyudmila D. Rogozina

Ph.D. (in Pedagogical Sciences), Docent, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy, Murmansk Arctic State University. Address: 15 Kapitana Egorova Str., 183038 Murmansk, Russian Federation.

Artem A. Punantsev

Post-graduate student, Murmansk Arctic State University. Address: 15 Kapitana Egorova Str., 183038 Murmansk, Russian Federation.

1. Akhrenov, VN. (2000). Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie usloviya vzaimodeistviya regionalnogo i munitsipal'nogo organov upravleniya obrazovaniem [Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions for the Interaction of Regional and Municipal Education Management Bodies]. (PhD Thesis). Moscow.

2. Al-Alawi, A., Abdulmohsen, M., Al-Malki, F. & Mehrotra, A. (2019). Investigating the Barriers to Change Management in Public Sector Educational Institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 112-148.

3. Alemu, D. & Shea, D. (2019). A Path Analysis of Diagnosis of Organizational Levels of Functionality: Implications to Educational Organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 33, no 7, pp. 1515-1525.

4. Ansoff, H.I. (1979). Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley.

5. Averkin, V.N. (1994). Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie usloviya osushchestvleniya regionalnoy programmy razvitiya obrazovaniya (na materialakh Novgorodskoi oblasti) [Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions for the Implementation of the Regional Education Development Program (Based on Materials from the Novgorod Region)]. (PhD Thesis). Saint-Petersburg.

6. Champoux, J.E. (2011). Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. New York: Routledge.

7. Cherezova, Y.A. (2016). Diagnostika organizatsionno-upravlencheskikh struktur na osnove kolichestvenno-kachestvennogo podkhoda [Diagnostics of Organizational and Management Structures Based on a Quantitative and Qualitative Approach]. Azimut nauchnyh issle- dovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie, vol. 5, no 1 (14), pp. 57-58.

8. Egorova, Y.S. (2019). Proekt metodicheskikh rekomendatsiipo sovershenstvovaniyu organizat- sii i upravleniya regionalnymi obrazovatelnymi sistemami [Draft Guidelines for Improving the Organization and Management of Regional Educational Systems]. Moscow: Prosvesh- chenie.

9. Gaur, A.S. (2006). Changing demands of Leadership in New Economy: A Survey of Indian Leaders. IIMB Management Review, vol. 18, pp. 149-158.

10. Greenberg, J. (2011). Behavior in Organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

11. Koshkina, V.S. (1992). Konstruirovanieprogrammy razvitiya regionalnoi obrazovatelnoi siste- my: na primere Leningradskoi oblasti [Designing a Program for the Development of a Regional Educational System: the Example of the Leningrad Region]. (PhD Thesis). Saint-Petersburg.

12. Kuzmin, S.S. (2007). Diagnostika organizatsionnoy struktury upravleniya predpriyatiem [Diagnostics of Organizational Structure of Enterprise Management]. Izvestiya of SFU. Technical sciences, no 2, vol. 74, pp. 133-134.

13. Lazarev, V.S. (1991). Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po formirovaniyu organizatsionnykh struktur regionalnykh organov upravleniya obrazovaniem [Methodical Recommendations on Formation of Organizational Structures of Regional Education Authorities]. Moscow: Litsom k litsu.

14. Lipatov, S.A. (2005). Organizatsionnaya diagnostika: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie os- novaniya [Organizational Diagnostics: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations]. Person. Culture. Society, vol. 7, no 3 (27), pp. 153-172.

15. Lobanov, V.V. (2010). Modernizatsiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: problemy i resheniya [Modernization of Public Administration: Problems and Issues]. Public Administration Issues, no 2, pp. 136-145.

16. Nesterova, S.I. (2009). Model' kompleksnoy diagnostiki organizatsionnoy struktury upravleniya predpriyatiem [A Model of Complex Diagnostics of Organizational Structure of Enterprise Management]. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gercena, no 119, pp. 113-116.

17. Nuruzzaman, N., Gaur, A.S. & Sambharya, R. (2018). A Micro-Foundations Approach to Studying Innovation in Multinational Subsidiaries. Global Strategy Journal. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3069857 (accessed: 24 February, 2020).

18. Osipov, V.S. (2016). Proektno-funktsionalnaya struktura upravleniya dlya gosudarstvennykh organov [Project-Functional Structure of Management for Public Administration]. Public Administration Issues, no 3, pp. 219-230.

19. Petrovichev, V.M. (1994). Regionalnoe obrazovanie, organizatsiya, upravlenie obrazovaniem [Regional Education, Organization, Education Management]. Tula.

20. Prigozhin, A.I. (1995). Sovremennaya sotsiologiya organizatsiy [Modern Sociology of Organizations]. Moscow.

21. Richardson, S., Nwankwo, S. & Richardson, B. (1995). Strategic Issues for Higher Education Strategists in the UK: a Political Contingency Perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 8, no 6, pp. 7-16.

22. Rogozina, L.D. (2018). Kachestvo upravleniya obrazovatel'nymi sistemami s pozitsii potre- bitelya [Quality of Management of Educational Systems through the Consumer Prism]. In: Actual Problems of Phycology in Education. Materials of the Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participating. Ed. I.A. Sinkevich. Murmansk, pp. 211-215.

23. Rogozina, L.D. & Punantsev, A.A. (2019). Metodika diagnostiki organizacionnykh struktur re- gionalnykh organov upravleniya obrazovaniem [Methods of Diagnostics of Organizational Structures of the Regional Education Authorities]. Vestnik Sankt-Petrburgskogo universiteta tehnologii i dizayna. Seriya 3. Ekonomicheskie, gumanitarnye i obshestvennye nauki, no 1, pp. 81-86.

24. Shcherbina, V.V. (1993). Sredstva sotsiologicheskoy diagnostiki v sisteme upravleniya [Means of Sociological Diagnostics in the Management System]. Moscow.

25. Shvetsova, G.N. (2009). Programmno-tselevoe upravlenie regional'noy obrazovatelnoy siste- moy [Program-Targeted Management of the Regional Educational System]. (Dr. Sci. Thesis). Cheboksary.

26. Urbanovic, J., Navickaitй, J. & Daciulytй, R. (2019). Autonomy, Collaboration and Competition: The Impact of Education Management Reforms which Aim to Increase School Autonomy on Relations between Schools. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 175-197.

27. Zhdankin, N.A. (2014). Diagnostika organizatsionnoy struktury predpriyatiya [Diagnostics of the Organizational Structure of the Enterprise]. Generalnyj direktor: Upravleniepromysh- lennym predpriyatiem, no 12, pp. 30-36.

28. Zhukov, Y.M. (2004). Metodyprakticheskoy sotsialnoypsihologii: Diagnostika. Konsul'tirovanie. Trening [Methods of Practical Social Psychology: Diagnostics. Consultancy. Training]. Moscow: Aspekt Press.

Аннотация

С появлением новых задач в области управления в практике регионов довольно часто осуществляется реконструкция организационных структур управления образованием, но преимущественно без анализа и оценки действующей структуры, выявления ее недостатков и определения их значимости для качества управления. Недооценка этого важнейшего этапа в региональной практике происходит из-за отсутствия научного и методического аппарата для обследования организационных структур регионального органа управления образованием. Такая практика приводит к тому, что новые структуры (по типу они, как правило, остаются линейно-функциональными) не обеспечивают в достаточной мере повышение эффективности управления в быстро меняющихся условиях. В статье раскрывается ситуационный подход к анализу и оценке организационной структуры регионального органа управления образованием в субъекте Российской Федерации. Разработан комплекс критериев и процедур ситуационной диагностики организационных структур. Проведено обследование структуры регионального органа управления образованием в Мурманской области с помощью ситуационной диагностики. В ходе исследования были выявлены некачественное выполнение значимых управленческих функций, проистекающее из линейно-функционального характера организационной структуры регионального органа управления образованием, недостатки в способах их группировки, несоответствие организационной структуры требованиям внешней и внутренней среды. Ситуационный подход к диагностике организационных структур управления образованием дал возможность руководителям в режиме реального времени и ситуации оценить деятельность органа управления в целом, скорректировать и переосмыслить представления о приоритетах деятельности, увидеть в ней то, что ранее было вне поля зрения.

Ключевые слова: региональный орган управления образованием; организационная структура управления образованием; диагностика структур управления; качество управления; функции управления образованием; дефекты процесса управления; ситуационный подход к диагностике организационных структур управления образованием; характеристики ОСУО; анализ и оценка структур.

Emerging management challenges often make regional education authorities start transforming their organizational structures. But, as a rule, such reconstruction takes place without analysis and evaluation of the existing structure, identification of its defects and their impact on the management quality. Underestimating these procedures happens because of the lack of scientific and methodological framework for the regional organizational structural research. Ultimately, even new structures are linear-functional, that is why management efficiency cannot be sufficiently increased under dynamic conditions. This article reveals a situational approach to the diagnosing of the organizational structure of the regional education authority in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation. Situational diagnostics includes a set of criteria and procedures that were used to assess the structure of the education authority in the Murmansk region. Diagnostics of the structure of this authority showed poor performance of significant managerial functions, imperfection of the way they are combined, and inconsistency of the organizational structure with the requirements of the external and internal environment. As a result, the situational approach to the diagnosing of organizational education management structures made it possible for managers to assess the authority performance completely in real-time mode, to change their ideas about the priorities of this performace, and to recognize previously unnoticed details.

Keywords: regional education authority; organizational education management structure (OEMS); diagnostics of management structures; quality of management; functions of educational management; management defects; situational approach to the diagnostics of OEMS; characteristics of OEMS

Размещено на Allbest.ru