Managerial implications on the relation of digital leadership, digital culture, organizational learning, and innovation of the employee performance (case study of PT. Telkom digital and next business department)

Managerial Implications and Recommendations

Some of the Managerial Implications and Recommendations that can be given according to the results of this study are as follows:

a. On the Aspect of Employee Performance

On the employee performance variable with the indicator Proving Ability has the lowest value, this needs to be considered by the company that employees must further improve their knowledge from various aspects related to experience, knowledge, and the ability of employees to carry out work tasks that are their responsibility.

b. On the Aspect of Digital Leadership

The digital leadership variable with the indicator Having a Vision for the Future has the lowest value, this needs to be considered by the company. An effective leader can relate to the vision and strategic action not only stating the hopes, dreams, and goals of change but must be accompanied by clear concrete actions.

c. On the Aspect Digital Culture

The digital culture variable with the Available Application indicator has the lowest value, this needs to be considered by the company so that the preparation time and facilities needed in managing a program must comply with existing standards so that the results obtained are of higher quality in the market.

d. On the Aspect of Organizational Learning.

In the Organizational Learning variable with the indicator Developing ability having the lowest value, this needs to be considered by employees that it is necessary to optimize all of their abilities in achieving good and superior performance by knowing their strengths and weaknesses and introspecting what has been achieved as an advantage and disadvantage, while for the company provide motivation, encouragement, and input for employees who are less than optimal in carrying out their duties.

e. On the Aspect of Innovation

In the innovation variable with the indicator of Relevant Resource Value Creation having the lowest value, the company must pay attention to that the existing resources must have supporting skills related to Logistics Management, including processes related to receiving, storing, and distributing inputs internally, relating to also with the operation of transformational activities that convert inputs into outputs that will be sold to customers. Innovations in logistics management are related to customer services such as collection, storage, and distribution systems related to marketing and sales.

CONCLUSION

Based on the research results that have been found, the managerial implications at the theoretical and practical levels can be stated as follows:

a. Employee performance

On the employee performance variable with the largest number of indicators, the Creativity indicator achieved has the highest value, this can be maintained to increase creativity in employees

b. Digital Leadership

The digital leadership variable with the largest number of indicators is the Communication indicator both externally and internally, and this must be maintained in supporting collaboration from parties outside the company.

c. Digital Culture

The digital culture variable with the largest number indicator is the Speed indicator at work, this is following the company culture which must always be maintained properly.

d. Organizational Learning

The Organizational Learning variable with the largest number indicator is Learning to see the whole together, this is following the work culture of the company jointly involving people who have expertise and talent in their respective fields and must always be maintained.

e. Innovation

The innovation variable with the largest number of indicators is Developing international networks, this must be maintained in establishing work in various fields.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors greatly acknowledge the support from the Universitas Negeri Jakarta, UNJ Jakarta Indonesia for providing the necessary resources to carry out this research work. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and journal editorial board for their many insightful comments, which have significantly improved this article.

REFERENCES

1. Afnan, E. and Silvianita, A., 2018. Pengaruh Knowledge Management Process Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (studi Pada Divisi Big Data Pt Telkom Indonesia). eProceedings of Management, 5(3). Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/299925323.pdf

2. Aragon, M.I.B., Jimenez, D.J. and Valle, R.S., 2014. Training and performance: The mediating role of organizational learning. BRQ business research quarterly, 17(3),pp.161-173. Available at:

3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2013.05.003

4. Bowen, T. and Pennaforte, A., 2017. The impact of digital communication technologies and new remoteworking cultures on the socialization and work-readiness of individuals in WIL programs. In Work- integrated learning in the 21st century. Emerald Publishing Limited.

5. Bratianu, C., 2015. Organizational learning and the learning organization. Orga nizational Knowledge Dynamics: Managing Knowledge Creation, Acquisition, Sharing, and Transformation, pp.286-312.

6. Chen, C.L., Lin, Y.C., Chen, W.H. and Heng, X.S., 2018. Determinants of cluster leadership and identification on cluster innovation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0305/full/html

7. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E. and Zampieri, R., 2019. The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Avalaibleat:Frontiersinpsychology, 10,p.1938.

8. https: //www.frontiersin.org/articles/ 10.3389/fpsyg .2019.01938/full

9. Cousins, B., 2018. Design thinking: Organizational learning in VUCA environments. Academy of Strategic ManagementJournal, 17(2),pp.1-18.Avalaibleat:

10. https://www.proquest.com/openview/d1c4bf232a535fd48953fe54fb4e90b2/npq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=38745

11. El Sawy, O. A., Krammergaard, P., Amsinck, H., & Vi nther, A. L. 2016. How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS quarterly executive, 15(2).

12. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. 2010. The role of innovation in development. Review of economics and institutions, 1(2). Available at: http://www.rei.unipg.it/rei/article/view/15

13. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. 2011. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2),139-152. Available at:

14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

15. Hussain, R. 2015. The emerging digital culture of Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. Journal of Philosophy, Culture, and Religion, 6, 18-25.

16. Ivancevich, J. M., Matteson, M. T., & Konopaske, R. 1990. Organizational behavior and management. Shaughnessy, H. 2018. Creating digital transformation: strategies and steps. Strategy & Leadership.

17. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SL-12-2017-0126/full/html Jyoti, J., & Rani, A. 2017. High-performance work system and organizational performance: Role of knowledge management. Personnel Review.

18. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. 2018. Coming of age digitally. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte Insights, 59(5), 1-10.

19. Lin, H. C., & Lee, Y. D. 2017. A study of the influence of organizational learning on employees' innovative behavior and work engagement by a cross-level examination. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3463-3478. Available at: https://www.ejmste.com/article/a-study-of- the-influence-of-organizational-learning-on-employees-innovative-behavior-and-work-4837 Luthans, F., 2021. Organizational Behavior _ An Evidence-Based Approach.

20. Mazzaoui, M. F. 1981. The Italian cotton industry in the later Middle Ages, 1100-1600. Cambridge University Press.

21. Osman, S., Shariff, S. H., & Lajin, M. N. A. 2016. Does innovation contribute to employee performance?. Procedia-Social and BehavioralSciences, 219,571-579. Available at:

22. https://doi.org/10.10167i.sbspro.2016.05.036

23. Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. 2017. Employee performance at the workplace: Conceptual model and empirical validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 69-85.

24. Shahzad, F. (2014). Impact of organizational culture on employees' job performance: An empirical study of software houses in Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management.

25. Rana, S., Ardichvili, A., & Polesello, D. 2016. Promoting self-directed learning in a learning organization: tools and practices. European Journal of Training and Development. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0076/full/html Rogers, D. (2016). The digital transformation playbook. Columbia University Press.

26. Russell, Z. A., Steffensen, D. S., Ellen III, B. P., Zhang, L., Bishoff, J. D., & Ferris, G. R. 2018. High- performance work practice implementation and employee impressions of line manager leadership. Human Resource ManagementReview, 28(3),258-270. Available at:

27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.003

28. Singh, Y., & Atwal, H. 2019. Digital culture -a hurdle or a catalyst in employee engagement. Int'l. J. of Management Studies, 6(1/8), 54-60. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/ijms/v6i1(8)/08 Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. 2014. Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.

29. Zhong, L. 2017. Indicators of digital leadership in the context of K-12 education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange(JETDE), 10(1),3. Available at:

30. https://aquila.usm.edu/jetde/vol10/iss1/3/

Размещено на Allbest.ru