Радіофармпрепарати на основі інгібіторів фібробласт-активуючого протеїну в онкологічній практиці

Вивчення питання застосування нового класу радіонуклідних трейсорів, заснованого на інгібіторах фібробласт-активуючого протеїну. Аналіз переваг радіофармпрепаратів на основі FAPI перед фтордизоксиглюкозою. Оцінка діагностичної ефективності FAPI-РФП.

Рубрика Медицина
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 28.06.2024
Размер файла 111,4 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

10. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy / E. J. Hamson, F. M. Keane, S. Tholen et al. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2014. Vol. 8, no. 5 P. 454-463. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095.

References

1. Bussard KM, Mutkus L, Stumpf K, Gomes-Manzano C, Marini FC. Tumor-associated stromal cells as key contributors to the tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):84. doi: 10. 1186/s13058-016-0740-2.

2. Osinsky SP. [Microenvironment of timorous cell and tumor progression. Factors of stromal microenvironment]. Zdorovia Ukrainy. 2013;(3):36-39. Russian.

3. Altmann A, Haberkor U, Siveke J. The latest developments in imaging of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(1):160167. doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.244806.

4. Roustaei H, Kiamanesh Z, Askari E, Sadeghi R, Aryana K, Treglia Could fibroblast acticvation protein (FAP)-specific radioligands be considered as pan-tumor agents? Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;2022:3948873. doi: 10.1155/2022/3948873.

5. Gascard P, Tisty TD. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: orchestrating the composition of malignancy. Genes Dev. 2016;30(9):10021019. doi: 10.1101/gad.279737.116.

6. Bu L, Baba H, Yoshida N, Miyake K, Yasuda T, Uchihara T, et al. Biological heterogeneity and versatility of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2019; 38(25):4887-4901. doi: 10.1038/S41388-019-0765-y.

7. Orimo A, Weinberg RA. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer: a novel tumor-promoting cell type. Cell Cycle. 2006;5(15):1597-1601. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.15.3112.

8. Cirri P, Chiarugi P. Cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells: a diabolic liaison driving cancer progression. Cancer Metastas Rev. 2012;31(1-2):195-208. doi: 10.1007/S10555-011-9340-X.

9. Scanian MJ, Raj BK, Calvo B, Garin-Chesa P, Sanz-Moncasi MP, Heally JH, et al. Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(12):5657-5661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12. 5657.

10. Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrelli MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014;8(5-6):454-463. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095.

11. Fibroblast activation protein a in tumor microenvironment: recent progression and implications (review) / F. Zi, J. He, D. He et al. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015. Vol. 11, no. 5. P. 3203-3211. doi: 10.3892/ mmr.2015.S197.

12. Jacob M., Chang L., Pure E. Fibroblast activation protein in remodeling tissues. Curr. Mol. Med. 2012. Vol. 12, no.10. P.12201243. doi: 10.2174/156652412803833607.

13. Effects of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor, PT100, in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis / C. Egger, C. Cannet, C. Gerard et al. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017. Vol. 809. P. 64-72. doi: 10.1002/ jmri.24603.

14. Increased N-terminal cleavage of alpha-2-antiplasmin in patients with liver chirrhosis / S. Uitte de Willige, J. J. Malfliet, H. L. Janssen et al. J Thromb. Heamost. 2013. Vol. 11, no.11. P. 20292036. doi: 10.1111/jth.12396.

15. Fibroblast activation protein alpha expression identifies activated fibroblasts after myocardial infarction / J. Tillmanns, D. Hoffmann, Y. Habbaba et al. J Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2015. Vol. 87. P. 194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.08.016.

16. Selective inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) with a (4quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidin scaffold / K. Jansen, L. Heirbaut, J. L. Chehg et al. ACS Medical Chem. Lett. 2013. Vol. 4, no. 5. P. 491-496. doi: 10.1021/ml300410d.

17. Identification of selective and potent inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein and prolyl oligopeptidase / S. E. Poplawski, J. H. Lai, Y. Li et al. J Med. Chem. 2013. Vol. 56, no. 9. P. 3467-3477. doi: 10.1021/jm400351a.

18. Phase II trial talabostat and docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer / R. M. Eager, C. C. Cunningram, N. Senzer et al. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.). 2009. Vol. 21, no. 6. 464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.04.007.

19. FAPI PET/CT in cancer imaging: a potential novel molecule of the century / R. Huang, Y. Pu, S. Huang et al. Front. Oncol. 2022. Vol. P. 854658. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854658.

20. From automated synthesis to in vivo application in multiple types of cancer-clinical results with [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi / L. Greifenstein, C. S. Kramer, E. S. Moon et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). Vol. 15, no. 8. P.1000. doi: 10.3390/ph15081000.

21. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers / F. L. Giesel, C. Kratochwil, T. Lindner et al. J Nucl. Med. 2019. Vol. 60. P. 386-92. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118. 215913.

22. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: mean intensity of tracer-uptake (SUV) in 28 different kinds of cancer / C. Kratochwil, P. Flechsig, T. Lindner et al. J. Nucl. Med. 2019. Vol. 60, no. 6. P. 801-805. doi: 10.2967/ jnumed.119.227967.

23. [18F]FAPI-42 PET imaging in cancer patients: optimal acquisition time, biodistribution, and comparison with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 / K. Hu, L.Wang, H. Wu, et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 8. P. 2833-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05646-z.

24. Zi F, He J, He D, Li Y, Yang L, Cai Z. Fibroblast activation protein a in tumor microenvironment: recent progression and implications (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015; 11 (5):3203-3211. doi: 10.3892/ mmr.2015.S197.

25. Jacob M, Chang L, Pure E. Fibroblast activation protein in remodeling tissues. Curr Mol Med 2012;12(10): 1220-1243. doi: 10.2174/156652412803833607.

26. Egger C, Cannet C, Gerard C, Wang Q, Xiao C, Han Y, et al. Effects of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor, PT100, in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;809:64-72. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24603.

27. Uitte de Willige S, Malfliet JJ, Janssen HL, Leebcek FW, Rijken DC. Increased N-terminal cleavage of alpha-2-antiplasmin in patients with liver chirrhosis. J Thromb Heamost. 2013;1 1(11):2029-2036. doi: 10.1111/jth.12396.

28. Tillmanns J, Hoffmann D, HabbabaY, Schmitto JD, Sedding D, Fraccarollo D, et al. Fibroblast activation protein alpha expression identifies activated fibroblasts after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;87:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.08.016.

29. Jansen K, Heirbaut L, Chehg JL, Joossens J, Ryabtsova O, Coss P, et al. Selective inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) with a (4-quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidin scaffold. ACS Medical Chem Lett. 2013;4(5):491-496. doi: 10.1021/ml300410d.

30. Poplawski SE, Lai JH, Li Y, Jin Z, Liu Y, Wu W, et al. Identification of selective and potent inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein and prolyl oligopeptidase. J Med Chem. 2013;56(9):3467-3477. doi: 10.1021/jm400351a.

31. Eager RM, Cunningram CC, Senzer N, Richards DA, Raju RN, Jones B, et al. Phase II trial talabostat and docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009;21(6): 464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.04.007.

32. Huang R, Pu Y, Huang S, Yang C, Yang F, Pu Y, et al. FAPI PET/CT in cancer imaging: a potential novel molecule of the century. Front Oncol. 2022;12:854658. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854658.

33. Greifenstein L, Kramer CS, Moon ES, Rosch F, Klega A, Landvogt C, et al. From automated synthesis to in vivo application in multiple types of cancer-clinical results with [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(8):1000. doi: 10.3390/ph15081000.

34. Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, Marschalek MM, Loktev A, Lehnert W, et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:386-392. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.215913.

35. Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, AltmannA, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: mean intensity of tracer-uptake (SUV) in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):801-805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967.

36. Hu K, Wang L, Wu H, Huang S, Tian Y, Wang Q, et al. [18F]FAPI-42 PET imaging in cancer patients: optimal acquisition time, biodistribution, and comparison with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(8):2833-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05646-z.

37. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET imaging in cancer patients / C. Meyer, M. Dahbom, T. Lindner et al. J. Nucl. Med. 2020. Vol. 61, no. 8. P. 1171-1177. doi: 10.2967/ jnumed.119.236786.

38. FAPI-74 PET/CT using either 18F-AlF or cold-kit 68Ga labeling: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and tumour delineation in lung cancer patients / F. L. Giesel, S. Adeberg, M. Syed et al. J. Nucl. Med. 2021. Vol. 62, no. 2. P. 201-207. doi: 10.2967/jnumed. 120.245084.

39. Clinical translational evaluation of Al9180-NOTA-FAPI for fibroblast activation protein-targeted tumor imaging / S. Wang, X. Zhou, X. Xu et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48, no. 13. P. 4259-4271. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05470-5.

40. Design and development of 99mTc-labeled FAPI tracers for SPECT imaging and 188Re therapy / T. Lindner, A. Altmann, S. Kramer et al. J Nucl. Med. 2020. Vol. 61, no.10. P. 1507-1513. doi: 10. 2967/jnumed.119.239731.

41. Imaging of fibroblast activation protein in cancer xenografts using novel (4-quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine-based small molecules / S. L. Slania, D. Das, A. Lisok et al. J Med. Chem. 2021. Vol. 64, no. 7. P. 4059-4070. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem. 0c02171.

42. [153Sm]Samarium-labeled FAPI-46 radioligand therapy in a patient with lung metastases of a sarcoma / C. Kratochwil, F. L. Giesel,

43. Rathke et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48. P. 3011-3013. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05273-8.

44. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of 131I-FAPI tracers for cancer theranostics / H. Ma, F. Li, G. Shen et al. Mol. Pharm. 2021. Vol. 18, no. 11. P. 4179-4187. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut. 1c005.

45. Clinical summary of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals: cancer and beyond / M. Li, M. H. Younis, Y. Zhang et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 8. P. 2844-2868. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05706-y.

46. State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis / M. Sollini, M. Kirienko, F. Geraldi et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48. P. 4396-4414. doi: 10. 1007/s00259-021-054750-0.

47. The potential utility of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 as a novel broadspectrum oncological and non-oncological imaging agent-comparison with [18F]FDG / L. Lan, H. Liu, Y. Wang et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 3. P. 963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05522-w.

48. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma / L. Zhao, Y. Pang, H. Zheng et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48, no.11. P. 3606-3617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05336-w.

49. FAPI-PET/CT improves diagnostic staging and radiotherapy planning of adenoidcystic carcinoma - imaging analysis and histolog-

50. Meyer C, Dahbom M, Lindner T, Vauclin S, Mona C, Slavik R, et al. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET imaging in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(8):1171-1177. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236786.

51. Giesel FL, Adeberg S, Syed M, Lindner T, Jimenez-Franco LD, Mavriopoulou, et al. FAPI-74 PET/CT using either 18F-AlF or cold-kit 68Ga labeling: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and tumour delineation in lung cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(2):201207. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.245084.

52. Wang S, Zhou X, Xu X, Ding J, Liu S, Hou X, et al. Clinical translational evaluation of Al9180-NOTA-FAPI for fibroblast activation protein-targeted tumor imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4259-4271. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05470-5.

53. Lindner T, Altmann A, Kramer S, Kleist C, Loktev A, Kratochwil C, et al. Design and development of 99mTc-labeled FAPI tracers for SPECT imaging and 188Re therapy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(10):1507-1513. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.239731.

54. Slania SL, Das D, Lisok A, Du Y, Jiang Z, Mease RC, et al. Imaging of fibroblast activation protein in cancer xenografts using novel (4quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine-based small molecules. J Med Chem. 2021 ;64(7):4059-4070. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02171.

55. Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Rathke H, Fink R, Dendl K, Debus J, et al. [153Sm]Samarium-labeled FAPI-46 radioligand therapy in a patient with lung metastases of a sarcoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:3011-3013. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05273-8.

56. Ma H, Li F, Shen G, Cai H, Liu W, Lan T, et al. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of 131I-FAPI tracers for cancer theranostics. Mol Pharm. 2021;18(11):4179-4187. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c005.

57. Li M, Younis MH, Zhang Y, Cai W, Lan X. Clinical summary of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals: cancer and beyond. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(8):2844-2868. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05706-y.

58. Sollini M, Kirienko M, Geraldi F, Fiz F, Gozzi N, Chiti A. State-ofthe-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4396-4414. doi: 10. 1007/s00259-021-054750-0.

59. Lan L, Liu H, Wang Y, Deng J, Peng D, Feng Y, et al. The potential utility of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 as a novel broad-spectrum oncological and non-oncological imaging agent-comparison with [18F]FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(3):963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05522-w.

60. Zhao L, Pang Y, Zheng H, Han C, Gu J, Sun L, et al. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 ;48(11 ):3606-3617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05336-w.

61. Rohrich M, Syed M, Giesel F, Liermann J, Choyke P, Kauczor HU, et al. FAPI-PET/CT improves diagnostic staging and radiotherapy planning of adenoidcystic carcinoma - imaging analysis and histoical validation / M. Rohrich, M. Syed, F. Giesel et al. Radiother. Oncol. 2021. Vol. 160. P. 192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc2021. 04.016.

62. The added value of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer of unknown primary with 18F-FDG negative findings / Gu, X. Xu, J. Zhang et al. J. Nucl. Med. 2022. Vol. 63, no. 6. P. 875-881. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121262790.

63. Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT and [18F]FFDG-PET/CT for radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer / S. Wegen, L. van Heek, P. Linde et al. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 6. P. 986-994. doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01749-7.

64. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a singlecenter exploratory study / C. Promteangtrong, D. Siripongsatian, A. Jantarato et al. J Nucl. Med. 2022. Vol. 63, no. 8. P. 11551161. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262831.

65. 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT in the detection of metastatic thyroid cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT / H. Fu, J. Wu, J. Huang et al. Radiology. 2022. Vol. 304, no. 2. P. 397405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212430.

66. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer / J. Wu, H. Deng, H. Zhong et al. Front. Oncol. 2022. Vol. 4, no. 12. P. 924223. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.924223.

67. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of advanced lung cancer / L. Wang, G.Tang, K. Hu et al. Radiology. Vol. 303, no.1. P. 191-199. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211424.

68. Clinical utility of F-18 labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) for primary staging in lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective study / Y. Li, X. Lin, Y. Li et al. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 2. P. 309-320. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01679-w.

69. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the evaluation of digestive system tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis / D. Huang, J. Wu, H. Zhong et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2023. Vol. 50, no. 3. P. 908920. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06021-2.

70. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG uptake in esophageal cancer / H. Liu, Z. Hu, X. Yang et al. Front. Oncol. 2022. Vol. 12. P. 875081. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.875081.

71. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT / R. Lin, Z. Lin, Z. Chen et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 8. P. 29602971. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05799-5.

72. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT] in evaluation the extent of disease in gastric adenocarcinoma / J. Kuten, C. Levine, O. Shamni et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. P. 743-750. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05494-x.

73. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG for the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in the patients with gastric cancer: a bicentric retrospective study / D. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. You et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 2. P. 732742. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05441-w. logical validation. Radiother Oncol. 2021;160:192-201. doi: 10. 1016/j.radonc2021.04.016.

74. Gu B, Xu X, Zhang J, Ou X, Xia Z, Guan Q, et al. The added value of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer of unknown primary with 18F-FDG negative findings. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(6):875-881. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121262790.

75. Wegen S, van Heek L, Linde P, Claus K, Akuamoa-Boateng D, Baues C, et al. Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT for radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24(6):986-994. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01749-7.

76. Promteangtrong C, Siripongsatian D, Jantarato A, Kunawudhi A, Kiatkittikul P, Yaset S, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68GaFAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center exploratory study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(8):1 155-1 161. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262831.

77. Fu H, Wu J, Huang J, Sun L, Wu H, Guo W, et al. 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT in the detection of metastatic thyroid cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 2022;304(2):397-405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212430.

78. Wu J, Deng H, Zhong H, Wang T, Rao Z, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2022; 4(12):924223. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.924223.

79. Wang L, Tang G, Hu K, Liu X, Zhou W, Li H, et al. Comparison of 68GaFAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of advanced lung cancer. Radiology. 2022;303(1):191-199. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211424.

80. Li Y, Lin X, Li Y, Lv J, Hou P, Liu S, et al. Clinical utility of F-18 labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) for primary staging in lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24(2):309-320. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01679-w.

81. Huang D, Wu J, Zhong H, Li Y, Han Y, He Y, et al. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the evaluation of digestive system tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(3):908-920. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06021-2.

82. Liu H, Hu Z, Yang X, Dai T, Chen Y. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTAFAPI-04 and [18F]FDG uptake in esophageal cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:875081. doi 10.3389/fonc.2022.875081.

83. Lin R, Lin Z, Chen Z, Zheng S, Zhang J, Zang J, et al. [68Ga]GaDOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49(8):2960-2971. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05799-5.

84. Kuten J, Levine C, Shamni O, Pelles S, Wolf I, Lahat G, et al. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT] in evaluation the extent of disease in gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):743-750. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05494-x.

85. Jiang D, Chen X, You Z, Wang H, Zhang X, Li X, et al. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG for the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in the patients with gastric cancer: a bicentric retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):732742. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05441-w.

86. Wang Y., Luo W., Li Y. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in the evaluation of gastric carcinomas compared with [18F]-FDG PET MRI/CT: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2023. Vol. 28, no. 1. P. 34. doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-00997-9.

87. 68Ga-FAPI-04 versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma / H. Wang, W. Zhu, S. Ren et al. Front. Oncol. Vol. 11. P. 693640. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.693640.

88. Comparisons of quantitative parameters of Ga-68-labelled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies / D. Siripongsatian, Promteangtrong, A. Kunawudhi et al. Mol. Imaging Biol. Vol.24, no. 5. P. 818-829. doi: 10.1007/ s11307-02201732-2.

89. Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT / W. Guo, Y. Pang, L. Zhao et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48, no 5. P. 1604-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0.

90. Comparison of PET imaging of activated fibroblasts and 18F-FDG for diagnosis of primary hepatic tumours: a prospective pilot study / X. Shi, H. Xing, X. Yang et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48, no. 5. P. 1593-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00259-02105070-9.

91. FAPI PET/CT in diagnostic and treatment management of colorectal cancer: review of current research status / Z. Cheng, S. Wang, S. Xu et al. J. Clin. Med. 2023. Vol. 12. P. 577. doi: 10.3390/ jcm1202057.

92. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer / H. Komek, C. Can, I. Kaplan et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 11. P. 38983909. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05839-0.

93. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography with [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors improves tumor detection and staging in patients with pancreatic cancer / Y. Pang, L. Zhao, Q. Shang et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 4. P. 1322-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05576-w.

94. Gege Z., Xueju W., Bin J. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal metastases: systematic review and meta analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. Vol. 220, no. 4. P. 490-498. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28402.

95. 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies / K. Dendl, S.A. Koerber, R. Finck et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2021. Vol. 48, no. 12. P. 4089-4100. doi: 10.1007/ s00259-021-05378-0.

96. Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with bladder cancer / E. Novruzov, K. Dendl, H. Ndlovu et al. Mol. Imaging. Biol. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 4. P. 651658. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01715-3.

97. Comparison of the relative diagnostic performance of [68Ga]GaDOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with different cancers / J. Wu, Y. Wang, T.

98. Wang Y, Luo W, Li Y. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET MRI/CT in the evaluation of gastric carcinomas compared with [18F]-FDG PET MRI/CT: a meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):34. doi: 10.1186/ s40001-023-00997-9.

99. Wang H, Zhu W, Ren S, Kong Y, Huang Q, Zhao J, et al. 68Ga-FAPI04 versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:693640. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.693640.

100. Siripongsatian D, Promteangtrong C, Kunawudhi A, Kiatkittikul P, Boonkawin N, Chinnanthachai C, et al. Comparisons of quantitative parameters of Ga-68-labelled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver malignancies. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24(5):818-829. doi:10.1007/ s11307-022-01732-2.

101. Guo W, Pang Y, Zhao L, FAN C, Ke J, Guo P, et al. Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(5):1604-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0.

102. Shi X, Xing H, Yang X, Li F, Yao S, Congwei J, et al. Comparison of PET imaging of activated fibroblasts and 18F-FDG for diagnosis of primary hepatic tumours: a prospective pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(5):1593-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00259-02105070-9.

103. Cheng Z, Wang S, Xu S, Du B, Li X, Li Y. FAPI PET/CT in diagnostic and treatment management of colorectal cancer: review of current research status. J Clin Med. 2023;12:577. doi: 10.3390/jcm1202057.

104. Komek H, Can C, Kaplan I, Gundogan C, Kepenek F, Karaoglan H, et al. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(11):3898-3909. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05839-0.

105. Pang Y, Zhao L, Shang Q, Meng T, Zhao L, Feng L, et al. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography with [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors improves tumor detection and staging in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(4):1322-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021 - 05576-w.

106. Gege Z, Xueju W, Bin J. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal metastases: systematic review and meta analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2023; 220(4):490-498. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28402.

107. Dendl K, Koerber SA, Finck R, Mokoala KMG, Staudinger F, Schillinds L, et al. 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(12):40894100. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05378-0.

108. Novruzov E, Dendl K, Ndlovu H, Choyke PL, Dabir M, Beu M, et al. Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with bladder cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24(4):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01715-3.

109. Wu J, Wang Y, Liao T, Rao Z, Gong W, Ou L, et al. Comparison of the relative diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients Liao et al. Front. Oncol. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 737827. doi: 10.3389/fonc. 2021.737827.

110. Head-to-head evaluation of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA FAPI-04 PET/CT in recurrent soft tissue sarcoma / B. Gu, X. Liu, S. Wang et al. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022. Vol. 49, no. 8. P. 2889-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05700-4.

111. with different cancers. Front Oncol. 2021;1 1:737827. doi: 10. 3389/fonc.2021.737827.

112. 60. Gu B, Liu X, Wang S, Xu X, Liu X, Hu S, et al. Head-to-head evaluation of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA FAPI-04 PET/CT in recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(8):2889-2901. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05700-4.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.