The factor-criteria model of assessment of electronic educational game resources in mathematics for primary school students

Creation of a unified state system for the evaluation of electronic educational game resources. Requirements for the substantive, methodological and program part of the project. Systematization of educational material in math lessons in primary school.

Рубрика Педагогика
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 01.12.2017
Размер файла 28,5 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Размещено на http://allbest.ru

8

Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of NAES of Ukraine

УДК 373.3.091.64:(0.034.2)](477-87)

THE FACTOR-CRITERIA MODEL OF ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME RESOURCES IN MATHEMATICS FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Oksana M. Melnyk, post-graduate student

Kyiv, Ukraine

INTRODUCTION

It is impossible to imagine modern education without the formation and use of innovative educational environment which is based on the balanced use of a wide range of forms, methods and new learning tools.

Due to more frequently use of information and communication technologies (ICT), including electronic educational resources (EER) in the educational process of primary schools, many researchers and practitioners are interested how to measure the effectiveness of such innovation and face the problem of objective assessment of EER.

Problem statement. The efficiency of any tools depends on their quality and the way how they are used.

Therefore, a quality of EER is one of the essential requirements for the effectiveness of new technologies implementation in educational process, which is especially important for sensitive primary schools students.

The study of scientific and pedagogical sources of information, pedagogical experience of primary teachers shows the widespread use of EER in practice, including EEGR.

Taken from the Internet or developed by teachers themselves they are not always of high quality because they are made without taking into account all necessary requirements and criteria [6].

There were adopted a number of important documents in Ukraine in the past few years to ensure scientific and methodological support of educational process with innovative tools.

They are such as the Action Plan for the development and implementation of e-learning content (order of the Ministry of Education, Science, Youth and Sports of Ukraine of 01.04.2011 №302), Regulation of electronic educational resources (order of the Ministry of Education, Science, Youth and Sports of Ukraine of 01.10.2012 №1060), etc.

But at present there is no common system of assessment of EER adopted at the state level in Ukraine, which leads to misunderstanding among software engineers and teachers in the process of creation of high-quality EER.

Analysis of recent research and publications. The study of the problem reveals that some aspects of determination of necessary quality criteria of EER, including such tools for primary school, are represented in the scientific works of G. Lavrentieva, V. Lapinskyi, S. Lytvynova, N. Olefirenko, O. Spivakovskyi, etc.

Thus, H. Lavrentieva examines of psychological and pedagogical requirements for computer games, ergonomic requirements for educational software and also health care requirements for electronic learning tools [5].

The requirements for electronics educational resources for primary schools are the subject of investigation of N. Olefirenko [7].

The collective work [1] presents a system of psychological and pedagogical requirements for the tools of information and communication technologies for educational purposes, in particular the scientist V. Lapinskyi analyzes the technical and technological, ergonomic and health care requirements for educational software for primary school pupils; the researcher S. Lytvynova reveals the features of the development of criteria for assessment of the quality of EER; the scholar O. Spivakovskyi clarifies the parameterization of the indicators and methods of evaluation of EER.

But, despite the fact that the questions of determination of the quality criteria of EER have been investigated by a number of scientists and researchers, as well as the fact that Ukraine has made some steps towards the information society and education in particular, including the development of legal support, our modern teaching practice is still not equipped with a unified system of the quality assessment of the EEGR in mathematics for primary school.

This situation leads to certain difficulties among developers of electronic resources and primary school teachers in a selection and development of their own high-quality electronic resources.

The unified system of assessment of EEGR in mathematics for primary school students will help to determine some common requirements for developers of these resources and to have a unified system of their implementation in the future. electronic educational game school math

The purpose of the article is to identify the main factors and quality criteria of EEGR in mathematics for 6-7-year-old students; to present and justify the comprehensive approach to assessment of EEGR quality; to determine the method of getting the ranking factors' and criteria's coefficients.

THE RESEARCH METHODS

To achieve the purpose of the research we used a set of general theoretical and empirical methods.

Theoretical methods:

- method of direct structural analysis;

- method of simply theoretical analysis;

- structural synthesis method.

Empirical method:

- simulation method.

THE RESEARCH RESULTS

Any process or implementation requires an objective assessment. Therefore, as the researcher V. Hrygorash says, nowadays the strict criteria's assessment and subjective experts' opinions (inspectors, headmasters, etc.) are being replaced by flexible, focused on objectivity, regulatory, quantitative assessment of educational process with the help of factor- criteria models [2, p. 140].

The problem of improving the system of assessment of secondary schools' activities was researched by the scientist H. Yelnikova [9]. A lot of researchers have built some factor-criteria models to assess the efficiency of learning process or certain personality traits' formation, specifically for the assessment of the effectiveness of computer- based learning environment of an institution of postgraduate education (K. Kolos [3]); the medical college students' autonomy levels (O. Kovalenko [4]); the level of students' responsibility (R. Zelenskyi [10]), etc.

On the basis of the classical methods, mentioned above, we developed the factor-criteria model of quality assessment of EEGR in mathematics for primary school students. Under the factor- criteria model for assessment of EEGR in mathematics for the 1-st grade students (FCM EEGR) we understand the complex system of quantitative and qualitative assessment of factors and criteria which determines the degree of conformity of the mentioned learning tools with the stated objectives, standards and norms.

In general, the quality of any product depends on the quality of each of its components. Based on the structure of EER, presented by S. Lytvynova [8, p. 87], we defined semantic, methodological and software components of the EEGR, mentioned above. We constructed the FCM EEGR in mathematics for primary school, identifying the factors and the criteria of each of them. They are presented in table 1.

Table 1

The factor-criteria model of assessment of EEGR in mathematics for 6-7-year-old students

Factor

Ranking factor'scoefficient

Criterion

Ranking criterion's coefficient

1

2

3

4

І. Content (common)

K1

1.1 conformitywithaccepted mathematics curriculum

ki.1

1.2 integrity and systematization

k1.2

1.3 succession and sequence

k1.3

1.4 simplicity of presenting

k1.4

1.5 opportunity of problem-based and practice learning

k1.5

1.6 tasks conformity with requirements for abilities and skills to be formed

k1.6

1.7 a balance of the theoretical and practical parts

k1.7

II. Content

K2

2.1. availability of game element

k2.1

(specific)

2.2. possibility of formative assessment

k2.2

2.3. possibility of summative assessment

k2.3

2.4. scoring of theoretical part

k2.4

2.5. scoring of practical part

k2.5

2.6. logical and precise system of encouraging students

k2.6

2.7. understandable assistance system

k2.7

2.8. availability of practical differentiating assignments

k2.8

2.9. possibility of multiple performance of assignments with their further complication

k2.9

2.10. connection of educational material with the life of primary schoolchildren

k2.10

2.11. use of characters and heroes of children stories

k2.11

2.12. positive emotional environment of

k2.12

assignments

III. Methodical

K3

3.1. availability, structure and content of methodical guidelines on the use of EEGR for teachers

k3.1

3.2. availability, structure and content of methodical guidelines on the use of EEGR for students

k3.2

IV. Ergonomic design

K4

4.1. interface understandable for a user

k4.1

4.2. ease of navigation

k4.2

4.3. feasibility of visual aids and their conformity to the content

k4.3

4.4. non-aggressive sound and colour design

k4.4

4.5. intelligibility and meaningfulness of sound guidelines and tips for students

k4.5

4.6. possibility of changing the font size

k4.6

4.7. possibility of changing musical support

k4.7

V. Technical and technological

K5

5.1. possibility to monitor students' work in the network both individually and the whole class

k5.1

5.2. operating systems' compatibility

k5.2

5.3. local mode operation

k5.3

5.4. network mode operation

k5.4

5.5. long-term smooth operation

k5.5

5.6. convenience and ease of installation and software update

k5.6

Then we are examining the factors and criteria presented in the model, mentioned above, in details. The content of the EEGR requires the adherence to certain general demands mostly the same as to printed and electronic publications, as well as specific, caused by age, psychological characteristics of primary school students and some peculiarities of electronic resources. The first of these groups is based on the well-known didactic principles.

One of the common requirements for the content is the conformity of learning material of the EEGR with a current curriculum in mathematics (probably, its topic, a part, etc.), approved by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) of Ukraine. Since the main purpose of the mentioned EEGR is assistance in studying mathematics by elementary school students, the theme or themes of the electronic resource have to be the same as the recommended ones by the MES of Ukraine for students of this age group.

The integrity and systematization of learning material is the next important criterion during studying mathematics, including primary school. This material has to form a single training cycle and cover all issues of the curriculum for the first grade students completely. In addition, its content should have an internal unity that is subordinated to a certain system of teaching mathematics taking into consideration all special features of elementary school students.

Another quality criterion for the EEGR, mentioned above, is succession and sequence of presenting learning material on mathematics. The content of each lesson should be connected with previous one and gradually become more complicated according to the curriculum during both a lesson and a whole topic.

A simplicity of presenting of educational material implements one of the common didactic principles. Taking into consideration that the resource is designed for 6-7-year-old students, developers should be especially careful about the level of complexity of educational material, tasks formulation, their compliance with the age and individual needs of students of this age.

An important requirement of the present time is providing an opportunity of problem- based and practice learning. A selection of tasks which contribute to the formation of students' creative thinking, learning through practice is a necessary condition for training a competitive active personality in the future.

One of the common didactic requirements includes the conformity of task requirements with the knowledge and skills that have to be performed. In other words, all EEGR assignments have to meet stated purposes to get profound theoretical knowledge and practical skills.

A balance of the theoretical and practical parts is also, in our opinion, a criterion of quality of the educational content of the EEGR. There is a need to balance the theoretical material with a certain number of practical tasks for each theme. It depends on material's complexity but needs to be sufficient for its understanding by students. On the other hand, theoretical and practical parts should not cause students' fatigue.

As for the specific didactic requirements, they are connected with the physiological, psychological, individual special features of 6-7-year-old students and some peculiarities of this type of electronic resources.

Since the resources that we are examining surely include a game component that is one of the most important requirements for students of primary school age, we have identified its existence as a separate specific requirement for the content part.

Despite the fact that the level of the 1-st grade students' knowledge is not marked according to the Ukrainian law (it can be done only verbally), we consider the possibility of formative and summative assessments of students' knowledge in the EEGR very important and reasonable. Such assessment should be provided in a comprehensible form for 6-7-year- old students (not in marks). This will help to support their desire to learn, identify and will contribute to further revisal of any problem and increase of students' learning motivation.

A specific requirement for the content part of the EEGR is a scoring of theoretical part in mathematics so far as some students of such age cannot read yet.

It is also necessary for students of mentioned age to have a scoring of practical tasks because they are only learning to read.

The specific features of such age should be taken into account: the speed of perception, concentration and so on.

To the following specific requirements for the content we refer a logical and precise system of encouraging students. The system should be presented in a way which is interesting and understandable to the students of such age and should not cause any negative emotions. The assistance should also be clear, precise and easy to receive, without any difficulties for primary school children.

We consider that another specific requirement for the resources mentioned above is availability of differential practical assignments in mathematics. The EEGR should enclose tasks of different complexity that will enable individual approach to students, help to build an individual learning path of each student, starting from the 1-st grade.

A possibility of multiple performances of the assignments with their further complication is a necessary condition for the developing education. The implementation of this requirement will allow each student to master theoretical knowledge and gain practical skills according to their personal abilities.

Psychological features of primary school age require a connection of educational material with the life of schoolchildren. The students of this age perceive and understand the course material more easily if it operates familiar objects to them and is connected with their lives.

The use of characters and heroes of children stories in the EEGR is extremely important for 6-7-year-old students because it increases learning motivation, creates friendly and more relaxed environment.

A positive emotional background of the tasks given in the EEGR is also necessary for primary schools. It affects and helps to create a friendly learning environment, motivate students to study.

The specified resource should be accompanied by the methodical guidelines on the use of the EEGR by teachers. The appropriate structure and content of the mentioned guidelines are very important for the effective implementation of the EEGR in training.

Such guidelines ought to include some organizational and methodological aspects of its use. They should also explain how, on what stage of a lesson the electronic resource can be implemented more effectively, contain time standards, compliance with medical rules and norms as well as all possible ways and forms of working with it.

Another requirement for the methodological part of the EEGR is an availability of guidance for students. Software should clearly warn about a mistake, offer help if it is necessary and support a transition to another level of complexity.

The structure and content of the guidance for students are also important. The recommendations should be understandable for 6-7-year-old students and can be presented in an audio format or by means of animation, or even as a short clear text which can be announced by a teacher.

The requirements for the program part of electronic resources are divided into two groups: ergonomic design, technical and technological, which are presented and detailed below.

An ergonomic design factor consists of the following criteria. The first of them is an interface understandable for a user. All students' actions in a user environment of EEGR occur with the help of the interface, which includes components of management, tools of the EEGR reaction to users' actions, information display format. The interface of the mentioned EEGR should be developed taking into account a possible level of the students' ICT skills.

The ease of navigation is another requirement. Database of the EEGR, software modules and data display tools should be designed in such a way that the navigation system will follow the shortest path and will be understandable for the 1-st grade students.

A feasibility of visual aids and their conformity with the content of the EEGR are another significant quality requirement for the EEGR, especially for primary school students.

Visual aids increase students' interest, keep their attention within a required period of time but they should not cause any fatigue or negative emotions. And since primary school age is very sensitive, the developers of EEGR need to be especially careful in a choice and amount of visual aids in the new electronic resources.

All 6-7-year-old children have specific psychological features; they are very emotional and conducive to external factors, including sounds and colours. Therefore, sound and colour design of EEGR should be non-aggressive. Sounds should be soft, melodious, based on children's songs. And mostly soft, pastel colours ought to be chosen.

An intelligibility and meaningfulness of sound guidelines and tips for the students in the EEGR are very important. All audio instructions should be recorded with a calm, friendly voice (male and female), clear and accurate.

Every child has the peculiarities of eyesight and visual perception. An uncomfortable font can cause fatigue. Therefore, it is necessary to provide the EEGR with a possibility to change the font size easily if it is necessary.

Monotonous music can annoy the students and cause their negative reactions. This fact should be taken into account by the EEGR developers providing it with a possibility to turn a tune off or to change it. That is very important for creating positive emotional environment.

The technical and technological factor of the EEGR consists of several criteria, presented below.

One of these criteria is a possibility to monitor students' work in the network both individually and the whole class. A teacher should constantly monitor each student's and a whole class progress via his electronic device (local network server) during a lesson.

It is important because any student can have some problems or difficulties during the lesson. The possibility to monitor learning progress both of each student individually and the whole class gives the teacher an opportunity to react and help any student immediately.

An EEGR compatibility with different operating systems is another important criterion. Any software, including the EEGR, should run regardless of a type of an operating system or electronic device. Otherwise, some inconvenience and difficulties for the students and teachers may arise.

A local mode of the EEGR is necessary both for an individual student's work and for teachers' preparing for the lessons. It allows working in groups or with the whole class without provider's service (for example, by the Bluetooth).

A network mode of the mentioned above resources is required for cooperation of students in a group or the whole class. In addition, the teacher's server should have an access to the Internet to get new database and update the EEGR.

Another criterion for the EEGR is a long-term smooth operation. All users expect that the software, installed on their devices, will run reliably for a long period, at least during 6 months. Software glitches are unacceptable because they can stop or make an uninterrupted educational process impossible.

A software installation process should not take much time or cause any difficulties for teachers. It saves teacher's time and does not lead to a delay of the educational process via EEGR or negative attitude towards the resource.

The ranking factor's and criterion's coefficients are determined in an expert manner (for example, with the help of ranking their magnitude by the primary school teachers, who use the EEGR almost every day).

They should take into account the fact that the cumulative sum of all the factors is 1:

K1 + K2 + K3 + K4 + K5 = 1,

so the cumulative sum of all the criteria within each of the five groups is:

k1.1 + k1.2 + k1.3 + k1.4 + k1.5 + k1.6 + kL7 = 1;

k2.1 + k2.2 + k2.3 + k2.4 + k2.5 + k2.6 + k2.7 + k2.8 + k2.9 + k2.10 + k2.11 + k2.12 =1;

k3.1 + k3.2 + k3.3 + k3.4 = 1;

k4.1 + k4.2 + k4.3 + k4.4 + k4.5 + k4.6 + k4.7 = 1

k5.1 + k5.2 + k5.3 + k5.4 + k5.5 + k5.6 = 1.

We propose to assess the ranking criterion's coefficient within each of the groups according to the law of the arithmetic progression.

The summative assessment of the EEGR (SAEEGR) is calculated as the sum of scores of each of the five factors О1, О2, О3, О4, О5 as follows:

SAeegr = О1 + О2 + О3 + О4 + О5,

according to the table 1:

О1 = K1 (k1.1 * O1.1 + k1.2 * O 1.2 + k1.3 * O1.3+

+ k1.4 * O1.4 + kL5 * O1.5 + kL6 * O1.6 + kL7 *1.7);

О5 = K5 (k5.1 * O5.1 + k5.2 * O5.2 + k5.3 * O5.3 +

+ k5.4 * O5.4 + k5.5 * O5.5 + k5.6 * O5.6).

Using this technique of EEGR assessment, the resource is considered to have sufficient quality to be used in primary schools if it gets 75% or more of the highest possible score.

If the EEGR gets 65-74% of the highest score, the quality of the EEGR is not high enough and it should be updated, followed by reassessment. In the case of less than 64%, the EEGR requires thorough review and improvement.

CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Thus, the determination of the key factors and quality criteria of the EEGR in mathematics for primary school children and taking them into consideration helped us to develop the relevant factor- criteria model for their quality assessment.

The direct proportionality of the ranking coefficients according to their importance encouraged the technique of obtaining the ratios of the factors and criteria.

This model seems to be a convenient tool for an objective assessment of the EEGR that will be useful both for primary school teachers and developers of electronic educational resources.

Such method of the EEGR assessment with the further selection and use of high-quality electronic resources in the educational process will help to increase the efficiency of education in primary school. This model can also be used as the basis for a creation of a unified state comprehensive system of EEGR assessment.

There is a logical necessity in identification of the primary school teachers' opinions about the importance of all factors and criteria to determine their ranking coefficients and the highest score of the EEGR that requires the further research.

REFERENCES

1. Evaluation of quality of educational software for comprehensive schools: monograph / [Zhaldak M. I., Shyshkina M. P., Lapinskyi V. V., Skripka K. I. та ін.]; scientific editing by prof. M. I. Zhaldak- К.: Pedagogical Thought, 2012. - 132 p. (in Ukrainian)

2. Hryhorash V. V. Qualimetric approach to expert evaluation of training and educational process / V. V. Hryhorash // Pedagogy of Formation of Creative Personality in Higher and Secondary Schools. - 2014. - P. 140-146. (in Ukrainian)

3. Kolos K. R. Criteria factor model of efficiency assessment of computer oriented learning environment of an institute of postgraduate pedagogical education / K. P. Kolos // Information Technologies in Education. - 2015. - №22, с. 80-92. (in Ukrainian)

4. Kovalenko O. O. Criteria factors model of assessment of the level of autonomy of students of medical colleges / О. О. Kovalenko // Pedagogical Science: theory, history, innovative technologies/ - 2013. - №8 (34). - P. 208-216. (in Ukrainian)

5. Lavrentieva H. P. Health Care Requirements to the Use of Electronic Learning Tools / H. P. Lavrentieva // Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2011. №2 (22). Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/files/341/11083481.pdf. (in Ukrainian)

6. Melnyk O. M. Analysis of the Results of the All-Ukrainian Investigation on the Use of ICT in Primary Schools / О. M. Melnyk // Pedagogical Search. - 2015. - №4 (27) December. - p. 95-99. (in Russian)

7. Olefirenko N. V. Requirements for electronic didactic resources for primary school / N. V. Olefirenko // Information Technologies in Education. - 2012. - Number 12. - с. 73-82. - Available from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/itvo_2012_12_14. (in Ukrainian)

8. The system of psychological and pedagogical requirements to the means of information and communication technologies for educational purposes / [Hryb'iuk О. О., Demianenko V. M., Zhaldak M. I., Zaporozhchenko Iu. H. And others]; edited by M. I. Zhaldak. - К.: Atika, 2014. - 172 p. (in Ukrainian)

9. Yelnikova H. Theory and methods of estimation results of the general education institutions / H. Yelnikova // Theory and Methods of Education Management. - 2012. - №8. (in Ukrainian)

10. Zelenskyi R. M. Criteria factor model of assessment of the level of responsibility / R. M. Zelenskyi // Pedagogy of Formation of Creative Personality in Higher and Secondary Schools. - 2011. - № 16 (69). - P. 72-79. (in Ukrainian)

Abstract

УДК 373.3.091.64:(0.034.2)](477-87)

The factor-criteria model of assessment of electronic educational game resources in mathematics for primary school students. Oksana M. Melnyk, post-graduate student. Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of NAES of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine ok_melnyk@ukr. net

This article proves the need for a comprehensive assessment of electronic educational game resources in mathematics for the primary school students; gives the definition of “the factor- criteria model of the electronic educational game resources (EEGR)”.

It also describes the created model, which consists of requirements for the content, methodological and program parts of the electronic resources for primary school; identifies the factors and the criteria to each of them. It was proposed to assess the ratios within the group of factors and each group of criteria according to the arithmetic progression. The presented model can be a convenient tool both for primary school teachers and EEGR developers. It can also be a basis for a unified state comprehensive system of assessment of the EEGR.

Keywords: electronic educational resources (EER); electronic educational game resources (EEGR); factor-criteria model of assessment of EEGR; ranking factor's coefficient; ranking criterion's coefficient.

Анотація

Факторно-критеріальна модель оцінювання електронних освітніх ігрових ресурсів з математики для учнів початкових класів. Мельник Оксана Миколаївна, аспірант. Інститут інформаційних технологій і засобів навчання НАПН України, м. Київ, Україна ok_melnyk@ukr. net

У статті обґрунтовано необхідність комплексного оцінювання електронних освітніх ігрових ресурсів з математики для учнів початкових класів (ЕОІР); дано визначення поняття «факторно-критеріальна модель оцінювання ЕОІР»; описано створену модель для оцінювання ЕОІР, яка складається з певних вимог до змістової, методичної та програмної частин; виявлено фактори та критерії кожної з них. Було запропоновано оцінювати вагові коефіцієнти факторів та критеріїв в межах кожної з груп за допомогою арифметичної прогресії. Представлена модель може бути зручним інструментом для об'єктивної оцінки ЕОІР, що є корисним як для вчителів початкової школи, так і для розробників електронних ресурсів. Вона також може бути взята за основу при створенні єдиної державної комплексної системи оцінювання ЕОІР.

Ключові слова: електронні освітні ресурси (ЕОР); електронні освітні ігрові ресурси (ЕОІР); факторно-критеріальна модель оцінювання ЕОІР; ваговий коефіцієнт фактору; ваговий коефіцієнт критерію.

Матеріал надійшов до редакції 26.02.2016р.

Аннотация

Факторно-критериальная модель оценивания электронных образовательных игровых ресурсов по математике для учащихся начальных классов. Мельник Оксана Николаевна, аспирант. Институт информационных технологий и средств обучения НАПН Украины, г. Киев, Украина. ok_melnyk@ukr. net

В статье обоснованы необходимость комплексного оценивания электронных образовательных игровых ресурсов по математике для учеников начальной школы (ЕОИР); дано определение понятия «факторно-критериальная модель оценивания ЕОИР»; описано разработанную модель, которая состоит из определенных требований к содержательной, методической и программной частей; определены факторы и критерии каждой из них. Было предложено оценивать весовые коэффициенты факторов и критерий в пределах каждой из групп с помощью арифметической прогрессии. Представленная модель может стать удобным инструментом для объективной оценки ЕОИР, что может быть полезным как для учителей начальной школы, так и для разработчиков электронных ресурсов. Она также может послужить основой для создания единой комплексной системы оценивания ЕОИР, принятой на государственном уровне.

Ключевые слова: электронные образовательные ресурсы (ЭОР); электронные образовательные игровые ресурсы (ЕОИР); факторно-критериальная модель оценивания ЕОИР; весовой коэффициент фактора; весовой коэффициент критерия.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

  • Disclosure of the concept of the game. Groups of games, developing intelligence, cognitive activity of the child. The classification of educational games in a foreign language. The use of games in the classroom teaching English as a means of improving.

    курсовая работа [88,5 K], добавлен 23.04.2012

  • History of school education system in the USA. The role of school education in the USA. Organisation of educational process in American schools. Reforms and innovations in education that enable children to develop their potential as individuals.

    курсовая работа [326,6 K], добавлен 12.01.2016

  • Italy - the beginner of European education. Five stages of education in Italy: kindergarten, primary school, lower secondary school, upper secondary school, university. The ceremony of dedication to students - one of the brightest celebrations in Italy.

    презентация [3,8 M], добавлен 04.04.2013

  • The education system in the United States of America. Pre-school education. Senior high school. The best universities of national importance. Education of the last level of training within the system of higher education. System assessment of Knowledge.

    презентация [1,4 M], добавлен 06.02.2014

  • School attendance and types of schools. Pre-school and elementary education. Nursery schools and kindergartens which are for children at the age of 4 - 6. The ideal of mass education with equal opportunity for all. Higher education, tuition fees.

    реферат [20,5 K], добавлен 01.04.2013

  • Development of skills of independent creative activity in the process of game on the lessons of English. Psychological features of organization of independent work and its classification. Development of independence student in the process of teaching.

    курсовая работа [35,8 K], добавлен 03.04.2011

  • Studying the system of education in Britain and looking at from an objective point of view. Descriptions of English school syllabus, features of infant and junior schools. Analyzes the categories of comprehensive schools, private and higher education.

    презентация [886,2 K], добавлен 22.02.2012

  • Involvement of pupils to study language as the main task of the teacher. The significance of learners' errors. The definition of possible classifications of mistakes by examples. Correction of mistakes of pupils as a part of educational process.

    курсовая работа [30,2 K], добавлен 05.11.2013

  • The history of the use of the interactive whiteboard in the learning. The use of IWB to study of the English, the advantages and disadvantages of the method. Perfect pronunciation, vocabulary. The development of reading, writing, listening and speaking.

    презентация [1,3 M], добавлен 23.02.2016

  • Features of training of younger schoolboys and preschool children. Kognitivnoe development of preschool children. Features of teaching of English language at lessons with use of games. The principal views of games used at lessons of a foreign language.

    курсовая работа [683,5 K], добавлен 06.03.2012

  • The purpose and psychology-pedagogical aspects of extracurricular work on a foreign language. Requirements to extracurricular work. Forms of extracurricular educational work on a foreign language. Using the Internet in extracurricular work on English.

    курсовая работа [38,9 K], добавлен 19.03.2015

  • Motivation to learn a foreign language in Kazakhstan. Motivation in the classroom. The role of games on language lessons. Examples of some games and activities which had approbated on English language lessons. Various factors of student motivation.

    курсовая работа [25,0 K], добавлен 16.01.2013

  • Planning a research study. Explanation, as an ability to give a good theoretical background of the problem, foresee what can happen later and introduce a way of solution. Identifying a significant research problem. Conducting a pilot and the main study.

    реферат [26,5 K], добавлен 01.04.2012

  • The impact of the course Education in Finland on my own pedagogical thinking and comparison of the Finnish school system and pedagogy with my own country. Similarities and differences of secondary and higher education in Kazakhstan and Finland.

    реферат [15,2 K], добавлен 01.04.2012

  • The basic tendencies of making international educational structures with different goals. The principles of distance education. Distance learning methods based on modern technological achievements. The main features of distance education in Ukraine.

    реферат [19,1 K], добавлен 01.11.2012

  • The problem of linguistic abilities of a child. Goals and objectives of foreign language teaching preschoolers. Number of pupils in a group, the frequency, duration of sessions. The game as the leading method of teaching preschoolers. Learning vocabulary.

    курсовая работа [39,5 K], добавлен 26.06.2015

  • Problems of child's psychological development. "Hot-Cold" games (for children till 7 years old). Intellectual Eye Measurer. Definitions and classification. Assessment. Computer, teacher's version. Mathematics. Statistics (for training of banking workers).

    реферат [46,3 K], добавлен 19.09.2015

  • What is the lesson. Types of lessons according to the activities (by R. Milrood). How to write a lesson plan 5 stages. The purpose of assessment is for the teacher. The students' mastery. List modifications that are required for special student.

    презентация [1,1 M], добавлен 29.11.2014

  • Transfer to profile training of pupils of 11–12 classes of 12-year comprehensive school its a stage in implementation of differentiation of training. Approaches to organization of profile education and their characteristic, evaluation of effectiveness.

    курсовая работа [39,4 K], добавлен 26.05.2015

  • Teaching practice is an important and exciting step in the study of language. Description of extracurricular activities. Feedback of extracurricular activity. Psychological characteristic of a group and a students. Evaluation and testing of students.

    отчет по практике [87,0 K], добавлен 20.02.2013

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.