Підвищення ефективності оцінювання якості підготовки майбутніх інженерів-педагогів за допомогою авторської математичної моделі

Аналіз результатів показав, що розроблена методика комплексного діагностування якості за допомогою авторського комп'ютерного середовище "Diagnostic Center" дала позитивний результат і сприяла підвищенню рівнів якості підготовки майбутніх фахівців.

Рубрика Педагогика
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 04.09.2022
Размер файла 1,3 M

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

21. Стандарти і рекомендації щодо забезпечення якості в Європейському просторі вищої освіти. Київ : Ленвіт, 2006. 35 с.

22. Суслов А. Г., Авдиенко А. Г. Система оценки качества подготовки специалиста. Качество. Инновации. Образование. 2005. № 3. С. 5861.

23. Туржанська О. С. Організаційнопедагогічні умови моніторингу якості підготовки майбутніх учителів математики : автореф. дис. ... канд. пед. наук : 13.00.04. Вінниця, 2012. 20 с.

24. Шабанов Г. А. Педагогическое обеспечение качества образования в вузе : дис. ... дра пед. наук: 13.00.08. Москва, 2006. 407 с.

25. Щербак О. І. Професійнопедагогічна освіта: теорія і практика: монографія / за ред. Н.Г. Ничкало. Київ: Наук. Світ, 2010. 314 с.

26. Becket N., Brookes М. Analysing Quality Audits in Higher Education. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, January 2005. Vol. 1. P 2. 13.

27. Brookes M., Downie N. Managing Change: The Value of Student Feedback. EuroCHRIE Congress Barcelona, 2002. P. 132138.

28. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies. URL: http://www. utwente.nl/bms/cheps. (дата звернення 05.07.2020)

29. Kuzmenko O. Corporate University: Ukrainian and world practice. The Advanced Science Journal. 2014. No 4. P 4649. doi: 10.15550/ASJ.2014.09.046

30. Powell A., Hunt А., Irving А. Evaluation of Courses by Whole Student Cohorts: a case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 1997. 22 (4). Р. 397 404.

31. Ramsden P. A. Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: the Course Expereince Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education. 1991. 16 (2). Р. 129 150.

32. Tam M. University Impact on Student Growth: a Quality Measure? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2002. 24 (2). Р. 211218.

33. Weert E. Higher education in the Netherlands. Country report. Twente: CHEPS, 2007. 75 p.

References

1. Ananieva, N. V., Litvinova, N. V. (2012). Features of engineering and pedagogical education in the conditions of reforming the educational system in Ukraine [Osoblyvosti inzhenernopedahohichnoi osvity v umovakh reformuvannia osvitn'oi systemy v Ukraini]. Bulletin of Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University named after Oleksandr Dovzhenko. Ser. : Pedagogical sciences [Visnyk Hlukhivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Oleksandra Dovzhenka. Ser. : Pedahohichni nauky], 21, 160165. [in Ukrainian]

2. Baidatska, N. M. (2007). Pedagogical conditions for monitoring the quality of students' academic achievements in higher educational institutions of nonstate ownership [Pedaghoghichni umovy monitorynghu jakosti navchaljnykh dosjaghnenj studentiv u vyshhykh navchaljnykh zakladakh nederzhavnoji formy vlasnosti]. Pedagogic science candidate author's abstract,

13.0. 04, Vinnycja, 220. [in Ukrainian]

3. Bezrukova, V. S. (1996). Pedagogy. Projective pedagogy [Pedagogika. Proektivnaya pedagogika]. Textbook for engineering and pedagogical institutes and industrial pedagogical colleges. [Ucheb. posobie dlya inzhenernopedagogicheskih institutov i industrial'nopedagogicheskih tekhnikumov], Yekaterinburg: Business Book, 344. [in Russian]

4. Yefremova, O. V. (2011). Construction of a mathematical model of the quality of professional training of engineering and pedagogical specialists [Pobudova matematychnoi modeli yakosti profesiinoi pidhotovky fakhivtsiv inzhenernopedahohichnoho profiliu]. New learning technologies: science. method. zb. Institute of Innovative Technologies and Content of Education, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [Novi tekhnolohii navchannia: nauk. metod. zb. Instytut innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii i zmistu osvity MONmolodsport Ukrainy], Kiev, 68, 111115. [in Ukrainian]

5. Yefremova, O. V. (2020). Diagnosing the quality levels of professional training of future engineersteachers [Diahnostuvannia rivniv yakosti profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnikh inzhenerivpedahohiv]. Theoretical and practical aspects of the development of modern pedagogy and psychology: a collection of abstracts of scientific papers of the participants of the international scientific practical conference [Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty rozvytku suchasnoi pedahohiky ta psykholohii : zbirnyk tez naukovykh robit uchasnykiv mizhnarodnoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii]. (Lviv, June 2627, 2020). Lviv: NGO "Lviv Pedagogical Community", 133136. [in Ukrainian]

6. Zavistovskij, S. E. (2016). Modeling the competence of a modern university graduate: innovative approaches [Modelirovanie kompetentnosti sovremennogo vypusknika vuza : innovacionnye podhody]. Continuous training of teachers of technological education and vocational training: integration, theory and practice. Materials XI int. scientificpractical conf [Nepreryvnaya podgotovka pedagogov tekhnologicheskogo obrazovaniya i professional'nogo obucheniya: integraciya, teoriya i praktika. Materialy HI mezhdunar. nauch.prakt. konf. Ul'yanovsk], Ulyanovsk, 126129. [in Russian]

7. Zghurovskyi, M. Z. (2007). The Bologna Process is a structural reform of higher education in Europe [Bolonskyi protses strukturna reforma vyschoi osvity na yevropeiskomu prostori]. Exchange trade.4004, 18, 52. URL: http://kpi.ua/bologna (data zvernennya: 05.01.2018). [in Ukrainian]

8. Kanivec, P. I. (2004). Models and methods for assessing the quality of training and improving the competitiveness of specialists [Modeli i metody ocenki kachestva podgotovki i povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti specialistov]. Dissertation of the candidate of economic sciences, 08.00.13. Novocherkassk, 223. [in Russian]

9. Kinash, I. P (2011). Quality of education as a result, process and educational system [Yakist osvity yak rezultat, protses ta osvitnia systema]. Scientific Bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine [Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy], 21.5, 363368. [in Ukrainian]

10. Kovalenko, O. E. (2012). Engineering and pedagogical staff: new requirements of today [Inzhenernopedahohichni kadry: novi vymohy s'ohodennia]. Problems of engineering and pedagogical education: a collection of sciences. prot Ukr. eng. ped. Acad [Problemy inzhenernopedahohichnoi osvity: zb. nauk. pr. Ukr. inzh. ped. akad], Kharkiv, 21, 817. [in Ukrainian]

11. Korobovych, L. P (2011). Pedagogical conditions for monitoring the effectiveness of the educational process in the system of pedagogical management of a private higher education institution [Pedahohichni umovy monitorynhu rezultatyvnosti navchalnoho protsesu v systemi pedahohichnoho menedzhmentu pryvatnoho vyschoho navchalnoho zakladu]. Pedagogic science candidate author's abstract, 13.00.06, Kiev, 20. [in Ukrainian]

12. International standard ISO 9001: 2015. Quality Management Systems. Requirements. URL: https://pqm

online.com/assets/files/pubs/translations/std/iso90012015(rus).pdf. (accessed: 09.07.2020).

13. Merezhko, N. V., Osiievska, V. V., Yasynska, N. S. (2010). Quality management [Upravlinnia yakistiu]. Kyiv: KNTEU, 216. [in Ukrainian]

14. Nakonechnyi, S. I., Tereschenko, T. O., Romaniuk, T. P (2004). Econometrics: a textbook [Ekonometriia: navch. posib]. Kyiv: KNEU, 352. [in Ukrainian]

15. Oleandr, T. M. (2011). Monitoring the quality of science education in the United States [Monitorynh yakosti pryrodnycho naukovoi osvity v universytetakh SShA]. Pedagogic science candidate author's abstract, 13.00.01. Ternopil, 22. [in Ukrainian]

16. Olendr, T. M. (2010). The only monitoring system of education management as an effective mechanism for improving the quality of educational services [Yedyna monitorynhova systema upravlinnia osvitoiu yak efektyvnyi mekhanizm pidvyschennia yakosti osvitnikh posluh]. Education and science in chemical and biol. faculty. TNPU them. V. Hnatyuk (19402010): mater. region. science. practical. conf [Osvita ta nauka na khimikobiol. fakult. TNPU im. V. Hnatiuka (19402010): mater. rehion. nauk. prakt. Konf]. Ternopil, 7375. [in Ukrainian]

17. Potaj, I. Yu. (2014). Evaluation of the quality of training in the university [Ocenka kachestva podgotovki specialistov v vuze]. Ukrainian magazine "Economist" [Ukrainskyi zhurnal «Ekonomist»], 5 (331), 2327. [in Ukrainian]

18. Potai, Y Yu. (2006). Development of a functional model of a quality management system for training specialists at a university [Razrabotka funktsyonalnoi modely Systembi upravlenyia kachestvom podhotovky spetsyalystov v VUZe]. Collection of scientific works of NUK[Zb. nauk. prats NUK]. Mykolaiv: NUK, 5 (410), 7282. [in Ukrainian]

19. Rogozhin, V. M., Elagina, V. S. (2017) The modern model of specialist training [Sovremennaya model' podgotovki specialistov]. Modern problems of science and education [Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya], 6. URL: http://www.science education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27136 (accessed: 09.07.2020). [in Russian]

20. Sergeeva, E. V. (2011). Monitoring student academic achievement in the quality management system of specialist training at a pedagogical university [Monitoring uchebnyh dostizhenij studentov v sisteme upravleniya kachestvom podgotovki specialistov v pedagogicheskom vuze]. Pedagogic science candidate author's abstract, 13.00.08, Volgograd, 27. [in Russian]

21. Standards and recommendations for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Kyiv: Lenvit, 2006, 35. [in Ukrainian]

22. Suslov, A. H., Avdyenko, A. H. (2005). A system for assessing the quality of specialist training [Systema otsenky kachestva podhotovky spetsyalysta]. Quality. Innovation Education [Kachestvo. Ynnovatsyy. Obrazovanye], 3, 5861. [in Russian]

23. Turzhanska, O. S. (2012). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for monitoring the quality of training of future mathematics teachers [Orhanizatsiinopedahohichni umovy monitorynhu yakosti pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv matematyky]. Pedagogic science candidate author's abstract, 13.00.04, Vinnytsia, 20. [in Ukrainian]

24. Shabanov, G. A. (2006). Pedagogical support of the quality of education at the university [Pedagogicheskoe obespechenie kachestva obrazovaniya v vuze]. Dissertation of a doctor of pedagogical sciences, 13.00.08. Moscow, 407. [in Russian]

25. Scherbak, O. I. (2010). Professional and pedagogical education: theory and practice: monograph [Profesiinopedahohichna osvita: teoriia i praktyka: monohrafiia] / N.H. Nychkalo. Kyiv: Nauk. Svit, 314. [in Ukrainian]

26. Becket, N., Brookes, М. (2005) Analysing Quality Audits in Higher Education. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, Vol1, 213.

27. Brookes, M., Downie. N. (2002). Managing Change: The Value of Student Feedback. EuroCHRIE Congress Barcelona, 132 138.

28. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies. URL: http://www. utwente.nl/bms/cheps. (accessed 05.07.2020)

29. Kuzmenko, O. (2014). Corporate University: Ukrainian and world practice. The Advanced Science Journal, 4, 4649. doi: 10.15550/ASJ.2014.09.046

30. Powell, A., Hunt, А., Irving, А. (1997). Evaluation of Courses by Whole Student Cohorts: a case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (4), 397 404.

31. Ramsden, P. A. (1991). Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: the Course Expereince Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16 (2), 129 150.

32. Tam, M. (2002). University Impact on Student Growth: a Quality Measure? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24 (2), 211 218.

33. Weert, E. (2007). Higher education in the Netherlands. Country report. Twente: CHEPS, 75.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.