Maximizing athletic performance: the benefits of combination training for sportsman

Vasanthi G., professor

Abstract

Physical education programs traditionally focus on specific exercises, such as running or weightlifting, which may not provide a well-rounded fitness experience. This article examines the benefits of combination and isolated training, specifically plyometric training, resistance training, isolated plyometrics training, and isolated resistance training. Combination training, which involves the integration of multiple training modalities, has produced more significant improvements in muscular strength, power, and athletic performance compared to isolated training. However, isolated training can be beneficial for targeting specific muscle groups or improving certain aspects of performance. Additionally, Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is discussed, a phenomenon that can occur following a heavy resistance exercise and lead to an acute enhancement of muscle force output. Incorporating PAP into a training program may enhance the benefits of combination and isolated training. The article concludes with practical recommendations for integrating combination, isolated training, and PAP into a comprehensive training program.

Keywords: Combination training, post-activation potentiation, Plyometrics training, Resistance training

Introduction

Physical education has been an essential part of university education for several decades. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of the importance of comprehensive physical education programs that focus on different types of exercise to provide a well-rounded fitness experience. Traditional physical education programs often focus on movement, such as running or weightlifting, which may need more to improve overall fitness and athletic performance. The combination of plyometrics training, resistance training, and isolated plyometrics and resistance training can provide a range of benefits for university-level students, including preventing overuse injuries, improving overall fitness and athletic performance, and refining technique. This article discusses the benefits of combining these different types of training and how they can be incorporated for the sportsman to maximize their sports performance and provide a well-rounded fitness experience for students.

combined isolated training runner athlete postactivation

Combination Training

Combination training integrates various training modalities, including plyometric and resistance training. Research shows that this type of training improves muscular strength, power, and athletic performance more than isolated training. The combination of plyometric and resistance training results in a synergistic effect, leading to better muscular strength and power improvements compared to either modality alone. This is because plyometric training enhances the rate of force development, while resistance training improves maximal strength.

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon that occurs after a heavy resistance exercise and can result in an immediate enhancement of muscle force output. This is due to the residual effects of the previous contraction, which increases the sensitivity of the muscle to subsequent stimulation. Incorporating PAP into a training program may improve the benefits of combination and isolated training. For instance, performing heavy squats before a vertical jump can boost jump performance due to the acute enhancement of muscle force output from PAP.

Benefits of combination training:

- Comprehensive fitness experience: Combination training combines different exercises to provide a well-rounded fitness experience.

- Improves overall fitness and athletic performance: Combination training can improve muscle power and speed, build muscle mass and strength, refine technique, and reduce the risk of overuse injuries.

- Reduced risk of overuse injuries: By combining different types of exercises, combination training can prevent overuse injuries that may occur when focusing on a single type of exercise.

- Greater variety and challenge: Combination training can provide greater variety and challenge, keeping workouts interesting and motivating.

Isolated Training: Isolated training involves the use of a single training modality, such as isolated plyometrics or isolated resistance training. Isolated training can be beneficial for targeting specific muscle groups or improving certain aspects of performance. For example, isolated resistance training can be used to target weak or imbalanced muscle groups, while isolated plyometrics can be used to improve explosiveness in specific movements.

Benefits of isolated training:

- Specificity: Isolated training focuses on a specific type of exercise to improve technique and build strength in a particular muscle group.

- Improves performance in a specific sport or activity: Isolated training can be helpful for individuals who want to improve their performance in a specific sport or activity.

- Greater control over the workout: Isolated training allows for greater control over the workout, which can benefit individuals with specific fitness goals.

Drawbacks of isolated training:

- Limited fitness benefits: Isolated training may not provide the same overall fitness benefits as combination training.

- Increased risk of overuse injuries: Focusing on a single type of exercise may increase the risk of overuse injuries.

- Limited variety: Isolated training can become repetitive and dull over time, leading to a lack of motivation.

Practical Application: Physical education and sports have always been an essential part of university education. The benefits of physical activity, including better health, improved mental well-being, and social interaction, have been well documented. However, traditional physical education programs often focus on one type of exercise, such as running or weightlifting, which may need more to provide a well-rounded fitness experience. Combining plyometrics training, resistance training, and isolated plyometrics and resistance training can help to create a more comprehensive physical education program.

Incorporating combination and isolated training into a comprehensive training program can improve muscular strength, power, and athletic performance. In addition, incorporating PAP into training can further enhance the benefits of training. This can be achieved by performing a heavy resistance before a power- based exercise to induce PAP. However, caution should be taken when implementing PAP into a training program, as it can lead to overreaching or overtraining if not properly monitored.

Conclusion

Physical education programs at universities should consider incorporating these different types of training to help athletes achieve their full potential. The choice between combination and isolated training depends on the individual's specific fitness goals and needs. Both variety and remote training have their benefits and drawbacks. Combination training, as the name suggests, involves combining different exercises, such as plyometrics and resistance training, to achieve a comprehensive fitness experience. This training can improve overall fitness and athletic performance, prevent overuse injuries, and refine technique. However, it may provide a different level of specificity and focus on a particular fitness area than isolated training.

On the other hand, isolated training focuses on a specific type of exercise, such as isolated plyometrics or resistance training, to improve technique and build strength in a particular muscle group. This type of training can be helpful for individuals who want to improve their performance in a specific sport or activity or build strength in a particular area of the body. However, isolated training may provide overall fitness benefits than combination training.

Ultimately, the choice between combination and isolated training will depend on the individual's fitness goals and needs. A well-rounded fitness program may include a combination of both types of training to achieve the best results.

Reference

1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (10_th ed.). Wolters Kluwer, 2018.

2. Baechle T.R., Earle R.W. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (3^rd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2008.

3. Behm D.G., Sale D.G. Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Medicine, 1993. Vol. 15 (6), pp. 374-388.

4. Cronin J.B., McNair P.J., Marshall R.N. Is velocity-specific strength training important in improving functional performance? Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2001. Vol. 41 (2), pp. 154-162.

5. Faigenbaum A.D., Myer G.D., Chu D.A. Plyometric training for children and adolescents: a comprehensive review of efficacy and safety. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2013. Vol. 27 (4), pp. 1091-1103.

6. Kraemer WJ., Ratamess N. A. Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2004. Vol. 36 (4), pp. 674-688.

7. Peterson M.D., Rhea M.R., Alvar B.A. Maximizing strength development in athletes: A meta-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2004. Vol. 18 (2), pp. 377-382.

8. Santana J.C., Vera-Garcia F.J., McGill S.M. A kinetic and electromyographic comparison of standing cable press and bench press. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2007. Vol. 21 (4), pp. 1271-1277.

9. Zatsiorsky V.M., Kraemer W.J. Science and Practice of Strength Training (2^nd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2006.

Размещено на Allbest.Ru