Serverless architecture overview: an in-depth explanation of what serverless architecture is, its key components, benefits, and challenges
Serverless architecture has emerged as a revolutionary paradigm in cloud computing, offering developers a scalable and cost-effective approach to building applications. Serverless architecture, focusing on its key components, benefits, challenges.
Рубрика | Программирование, компьютеры и кибернетика |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 10.10.2024 |
Размер файла | 20,7 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
Serverless architecture overview: an in-depth explanation of what serverless architecture is, its key components, benefits, and challenges
Baikenych Iryna-Anastasiia Volodymyrivna
Undergraduate student
of the Department of Discrete Analysis and Intelligent
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
Scientific adviser: Shcherbyna Yurii Mykolayovych
Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Professor, Department of Discrete Analysis and Intelligent
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
Summary
Serverless architecture has emerged as a revolutionary paradigm in cloud computing, offering developers a scalable and cost-effective approach to building and deploying applications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of serverless architecture, focusing on its key components, benefits, challenges, and future trends. serverless architecture cloud
We delve into core components such as Function as a Service (FaaS), Backend as a Service (BaaS), and event-driven architecture, highlighting their roles in enabling developers to build highly scalable and responsive applications. Furthermore, we explore the benefits of serverless architecture, including cost-effectiveness, scalability, and improved development velocity, while also addressing challenges such as cold start latency, vendor lock-in, and observability and debugging complexities.
Looking ahead, we discuss future trends and considerations in serverless architecture, including advancements in technology, hybrid and multi-cloud deployments, and the importance of observability and DevOps practices. Finally, we encourage further exploration and adoption of serverless computing, emphasizing its potential to drive innovation and business success in the digital era.
Keywords: Serverless Architecture, Function as a Service (FaaS), Backend as a Service (BaaS), Event- Driven Architecture, Cloud Computing, Scalability, Cost-effectiveness, Developer Productivity, Cold Start Latency, Vendor Lock-in, Observability, DevOps, Hybrid Cloud, Multi-cloud
Introduction
Serverless architecture has emerged as a revolutionary paradigm in the realm of cloud computing, garnering increasing popularity among developers and organizations alike. This transformative approach to application development
promises greater agility, scalability, and cost-efficiency by abstracting away the complexities of infrastructure management. As a result, serverless computing has swiftly become a cornerstone of modern software engineering, powering a myriad of applications across diverse industries.
Serverless computing is a pay-as-you-go model that allows companies to focus on their business logic while a cloud service provider handles infrastructure management [1]. Platforms like AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions have been introduced. Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is the most widely adopted form of serverless computing, allowing developers to upload source code and specify triggers to execute short-running functions.
The exponential rise in the adoption of serverless architecture can be attributed to several key factors driving the evolution of cloud-native technologies. One of the primary drivers is the growing demand for scalable and cost-effective solutions to support dynamic workloads and fluctuating user demand. Traditional infrastructure provisioning models often struggle to accommodate these requirements efficiently, leading to over-provisioning, underutilization, and associated cost overheads [2].
Serverless architecture addresses these challenges by offering a pay-as-you- go model, wherein users are billed only for the resources consumed during the execution of their applications. This consumption-based pricing model aligns with the principles of operational efficiency and cost optimization, enabling organizations to allocate their resources judiciously and scale their applications seamlessly without incurring unnecessary expenses.
Furthermore, serverless computing promotes a developer-centric approach by abstracting away the underlying infrastructure complexities and empowering developers to focus solely on writing code to implement business logic. This paradigm shift from infrastructure-centric to function-centric development fosters innovation, accelerates time-to-market, and enhances developer productivity. Consequently, developers can rapidly prototype, deploy, and iterate on their applications, driving agility and competitiveness in today's fast-paced digital landscape.
Another driving force behind the popularity of serverless architecture is its inherent scalability and elasticity [3]. By leveraging auto-scaling capabilities and event-driven architectures, serverless platforms can effortlessly handle varying workloads, ranging from sporadic bursts of traffic to sustained high-throughput scenarios. This dynamic scalability ensures optimal resource utilization, eliminates the need for capacity planning, and provides unparalleled flexibility to accommodate evolving business requirements.
Additionally, serverless architecture facilitates seamless integration with other cloud services and third-party APIs, enabling developers to leverage a rich ecosystem of pre-built components and services to enhance the functionality and extensibility of their applications. This interoperability and composability empower organizations to orchestrate complex workflows, implement advanced features, and deliver innovative solutions with minimal effort and overhead.
In essence, the increasing popularity of serverless architecture can be attributed to its ability to address the inherent challenges of traditional infrastructure provisioning models, empower developers to focus on value-added activities, and deliver scalable, cost-effective, and resilient applications that meet the dynamic needs of today's digital economy.
In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, serverless architecture has emerged as a revolutionary approach to application development and deployment. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of serverless architecture, including its definition, key components, benefits, and challenges.
Understanding Serverless Architecture: Serverless architecture, often referred to as Function as a Service (FaaS), represents a paradigm shift in cloud computing [3]. Unlike traditional server-based models where developers are responsible for managing servers and infrastructure, serverless architecture abstracts away the underlying infrastructure, allowing developers to focus solely on writing code. In this section, we will delve into the fundamental principles and characteristics of serverless architecture, highlighting its event-driven nature and pay-per-use pricing model.
Key Components of Serverless Architecture: To build a solid understanding of serverless architecture, it's essential to explore its key components. This includes Function as a Service (FaaS), which enables developers to execute code in response to events without provisioning or managing servers. Additionally, we will examine Backend as a Service (BaaS), which provides ready-to-use backend services such as databases and authentication, further simplifying the development process. Moreover, event-driven architecture serves as the backbone of serverless computing, facilitating seamless communication between various components of an application [4].
Benefits of Serverless Architecture: Serverless architecture offers a myriad of benefits for developers and organizations alike. By eliminating the need for infrastructure management, serverless computing significantly reduces operational overhead and allows developers to focus on writing code. Moreover, its auto-scaling capabilities enable applications to effortlessly handle fluctuations in workload, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization. Additionally, serverless architecture promotes rapid development and deployment cycles, accelerating time- to-market and fostering innovation [2].
Challenges of Serverless Architecture: While serverless architecture offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges that must be addressed. One of the primary challenges is cold start latency, wherein the time taken to execute the first request can be higher compared to subsequent requests. Furthermore, vendor lock-in is a potential concern, as reliance on a specific cloud provider's services may limit portability and flexibility. Additionally, ensuring observability and debugging in serverless applications can be challenging due to the distributed and event-driven nature of the architecture.
In conclusion, this article aims to equip readers with a comprehensive understanding of serverless architecture, from its foundational principles to its practical implications. By exploring its key components, benefits, and challenges, readers will gain valuable insights into the transformative potential of serverless computing in modern application development.
Understanding Serverless Architecture
Serverless architecture represents a significant departure from traditional server-based computing models, offering a more efficient and scalable approach to application development and deployment. In this section, we will delve into the definition of serverless architecture, its fundamental principles, and its role in modern cloud computing.
Definition of serverless architecture
At its core, serverless architecture is an execution model where the cloud provider dynamically manages the allocation and provisioning of servers. In other words, developers are relieved of the responsibility of managing servers, virtual machines, or containers. Instead, they focus solely on writing and deploying code in the form of functions or microservices.
These functions are triggered by various events, such as HTTP requests, database changes, or file uploads, and are executed in ephemeral containers that are spun up and torn down as needed.
One key aspect of serverless architecture is its event-driven nature [5]. Functions are executed in response to specific events or triggers, allowing for highly scalable and responsive applications. For example, an e-commerce application may use serverless functions to process orders, send email notifications, or update inventory in real time, triggered by events such as new orders or inventory changes.
Additionally, serverless architecture typically follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where developers are charged based on the number of function invocations and the resources consumed during execution. This provides cost savings and scalability benefits, as resources are allocated dynamically based on demand, and developers only pay for the compute resources used during execution [1].
It's important to note that despite the name "serverless," servers are still involved in the execution of functions. However, developers are abstracted away from the underlying infrastructure, allowing them to focus on writing code and building scalable, event-driven applications.
In summary, serverless architecture is a cloud computing paradigm that enables developers to build and deploy applications without the need to manage servers. By leveraging event-driven execution and a pay-per-use pricing model, serverless architecture offers scalability, agility, and cost-efficiency, making it an attractive option for modern application development.
Evolution of serverless computing
Emergence of Cloud Computing: The inception of serverless computing can be traced back to the emergence of cloud computing in the mid-2000s, which introduced concepts like IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, enabling organizations to offload infrastructure management to cloud providers.
Introduction of Function as a Service (FaaS): The concept of serverless computing solidified with the introduction of Function as a Service (FaaS) platforms, such as AWS Lambda in 2014. FaaS allowed developers to deploy code as functions triggered by events, abstracting away server management.
Expansion of Serverless Ecosystem: Other cloud providers like Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) followed suit with their own FaaS offerings, expanding the serverless ecosystem and providing developers with more options.
Adoption of Microservices Architecture: Serverless computing complements the adoption of microservices architecture by offering a scalable and cost-effective platform for deploying individual microservices, aligning with the trend of breaking down applications into smaller, independently deployable services.
Maturation of Serverless Tooling and Services: Over time, the tooling and services surrounding serverless computing have matured, including advancements in monitoring, debugging tools, integration with databases and messaging queues, and the development of serverless frameworks and deployment pipelines.
Future Directions: Looking ahead, the evolution of serverless computing is expected to continue with enhancements in performance, support for new programming languages and runtimes, and further integration with emerging technologies like machine learning and edge computing. The adoption of serverless computing is also likely to expand beyond traditional web and mobile applications to encompass a broader range of use cases and industries.
Key characteristics and principles
Event-Driven Computing: Serverless functions or microservices are triggered by specific events or requests, enabling dynamic responses to changes in the application's environment [5].
Ephemeral Execution Environment: Functions run in ephemeral containers, which are instantiated and terminated dynamically in response to incoming requests, eliminating the need for managing long-lived server instances.
Auto-Scaling: Serverless platforms automatically allocate resources to handle varying workloads, scaling up or down based on demand to ensure optimal performance and resource utilization.
Pay-Per-Use Pricing Model: Serverless architecture typically follows a pay-per- use pricing model, where developers are charged based on the number of function invocations and the resources consumed during execution, offering cost savings and flexibility [1 ].
Statelessness: Serverless functions are stateless, meaning they do not maintain persistent state between invocations, simplifying scalability and parallel execution but requiring external management of application state [6].
Vendor-Managed Infrastructure: Cloud providers manage the underlying infrastructure, relieving developers of server management responsibilities but potentially leading to vendor lock-in due to dependency on proprietary services and APIs [7].
Understanding these key characteristics and principles is essential for leveraging the benefits of serverless architecture in building scalable, responsive, and cost-effective cloud-native applications.
Key Components of Serverless Architecture
Serverless architecture represents a paradigm shift in cloud computing, offering developers a more efficient and scalable approach to building and deploying applications. Within this architecture, several key components play integral roles in enabling its functionality and flexibility. In this section, we will explore these components, including Function as a Service (FaaS), Backend as a Service (BaaS), and event-driven architecture, shedding light on their significance and contributions to the serverless computing paradigm. Let's delve deeper into the core components driving the evolution of modern cloud-native applications.
Function as a Service (FaaS)
Function as a Service (FaaS) is a pivotal component of serverless architecture, enabling developers to deploy individual functions or blocks of code without managing underlying infrastructure. FaaS platforms abstract away server management tasks, allowing developers to focus solely on writing code to implement specific functionality. Functions are triggered by events or requests, such as HTTP requests, database changes, or file uploads, and execute in ephemeral containers provided by the FaaS platform. This on-demand execution model eliminates the need for developers to provision or manage servers, resulting in improved resource utilization and cost efficiency [3] [8].
FaaS plays a central role in serverless architecture, serving as the primary execution environment for application logic. In serverless architecture, applications are composed of individual functions that are deployed and executed independently, with each function responsible for a specific task or piece of functionality. FaaS enables event-driven execution, scalability, and granular billing, allowing applications to respond dynamically to changes in workload and scale seamlessly in response to demand. By abstracting away server management tasks, FaaS empowers developers to build scalable, responsive, and cost-effective applications in the cloud [8].
Backend as a Service (BaaS)
Backend as a Service (BaaS) is a cloud computing service model that provides ready-to-use backend services, such as databases, authentication, and file storage, to developers, allowing them to focus on building frontend applications. BaaS platforms abstract away the complexities of backend development, offering pre-built APIs and services that developers can integrate into their applications. Examples of BaaS providers include Firebase, AWS Amplify, and Microsoft Azure Mobile Apps.
BaaS can be seamlessly integrated with serverless architecture to enhance the development and deployment of applications. By leveraging BaaS services, developers can offload common backend tasks, such as user authentication, data storage, and real-time updates, to specialized providers, reducing development time and effort. In serverless architecture, BaaS services are often used in conjunction with FaaS functions to create fully functional applications that scale dynamically in response to changes in workload.
Event-driven architecture
Event-driven architecture is a design pattern where the flow of application logic is driven by events or messages. In event-driven architecture, components of the system communicate asynchronously through events, allowing for loose coupling and flexibility. Events can represent a wide range of occurrences, such as user actions, system events, or external triggers, and can be processed by one or more event handlers. Event-driven architecture promotes decoupling, scalability, and responsiveness, making it well-suited for serverless computing environments [5].
Events play a crucial role in serverless computing, serving as triggers for the execution of functions or microservices. In serverless architecture, functions are event-driven, meaning they are invoked in response to specific events or requests. Events can include HTTP requests, database changes, file uploads, or scheduled tasks, among others. By leveraging event-driven architecture, serverless applications can respond dynamically to changes in their environment, enabling highly scalable and responsive systems that can handle varying workloads efficiently.
Benefits of Serverless Architecture
Serverless architecture offers a range of benefits that make it an attractive choice for modern application development. In this section, we'll explore these benefits in detail, focusing on cost-effectiveness, scalability and flexibility, and improved development velocity.
Cost-effectiveness
Serverless architecture eliminates the need for developers to manage infrastructure, including provisioning, scaling, and maintaining servers. With traditional server-based models, organizations incur costs associated with server procurement, maintenance, and capacity planning. In contrast, serverless architecture abstracts away infrastructure management tasks, allowing developers to focus on writing code without worrying about server maintenance. This results in cost savings by reducing operational overhead and eliminating the need for upfront infrastructure investment [2].
Serverless platforms typically follow a pay-per-use pricing model, where developers are charged based on the number of function invocations and the resources consumed during execution. This granular pricing model offers cost savings and flexibility, as developers only pay for the compute resources used during execution, rather than paying for idle capacity. Additionally, the pay-per-use pricing model aligns with the scalability benefits of serverless architecture, ensuring costeffectiveness as applications scale [1].
Scalability and flexibility
Serverless platforms offer automatic scaling capabilities, allowing applications to handle varying workloads efficiently. As the workload increases, additional instances of functions are spun up to handle the load, ensuring optimal performance and responsiveness. Conversely, when demand decreases, unused resources are deallocated, reducing costs and eliminating over-provisioning. This automatic scaling capability enables applications to scale seamlessly in response to changes in demand, without the need for manual intervention.
Serverless architecture excels at handling variable workloads efficiently, thanks to its automatic scaling capabilities. Traditional server-based models often struggle to handle sudden spikes in traffic or fluctuating workloads, leading to performance issues and downtime. In contrast, serverless platforms dynamically allocate resources based on demand, ensuring that applications can scale up or down quickly to accommodate changes in workload. This scalability and flexibility enable organizations to build highly responsive and resilient applications that can handle unpredictable traffic patterns with ease .
Improved development velocity
Serverless architecture allows developers to focus on writing code to implement application logic, rather than managing infrastructure. By abstracting away server management tasks, serverless platforms enable developers to spend more time on designing and implementing features that deliver value to users. This focus on application logic accelerates the development process, enabling faster time-to-market for applications and fostering innovation.
Serverless architecture promotes rapid deployment and iteration, enabling developers to release new features and updates quickly and frequently. With traditional server-based models, deploying changes to production can be a cumbersome and time-consuming process, requiring manual configuration and coordination. In contrast, serverless platforms facilitate seamless deployment and rollback of functions, allowing developers to iterate on their code rapidly and experiment with new ideas without fear of disrupting production environments. This agility and flexibility empower organizations to respond quickly to changing market conditions and user feedback, driving continuous improvement and innovation.
Challenges of Serverless Architecture
Despite its numerous benefits, serverless architecture also presents several challenges that developers and organizations need to address. In this section, we'll delve into these challenges, including cold start latency, vendor lock-in, and observability and debugging, providing insights into their nature and potential mitigation strategies.
Cold start latency
Cold start latency refers to the delay experienced when invoking a serverless function for the first time or after a period of inactivity. During a cold start, the cloud provider needs to allocate resources, initialize the execution environment, and load the function code, which can result in increased response times. This latency can impact the performance and responsiveness of serverless applications, particularly for functions with stringent latency requirements [9].
To mitigate cold start latency, developers can employ several strategies, including optimizing function initialization time, pre-warming functions, and using provisioned concurrency. Optimizing function initialization involves reducing the size of the function code, minimizing dependencies, and optimizing startup logic. Prewarming functions involves periodically invoking functions to keep them warm and ready to handle incoming requests. Additionally, cloud providers offer provisioned concurrency features that allow developers to pre-allocate resources to functions, reducing cold start latency and improving performance.
Vendor lock-in
Vendor lock-in is a significant concern in serverless architecture, as organizations may become dependent on proprietary services and APIs offered by a specific cloud provider. This dependency can limit flexibility and portability, making it challenging to migrate applications to alternative cloud platforms or providers. Additionally, vendor-specific services may lack interoperability with other cloud services, further increasing the risk of lock-in and hindering integration with existing infrastructure or third-party services [7].
To minimize vendor lock-in, organizations can adopt several strategies, including using cloud-agnostic tools and frameworks, adhering to industry standards and best practices, and implementing abstraction layers to decouple applications from underlying infrastructure. By leveraging cloud-agnostic tools and frameworks, organizations can reduce dependency on vendor-specific services and ensure portability across different cloud platforms. Additionally, adherence to industry standards and best practices promotes interoperability and compatibility, facilitating seamless migration and integration with alternative cloud providers.
Observability and debugging
Observability and debugging are challenging in serverless architecture due to the distributed and ephemeral nature of functions. Traditional monitoring tools may struggle to provide visibility into serverless applications, making it difficult to identify performance bottlenecks, troubleshoot issues, and monitor resource utilization effectively. Additionally, the lack of access to underlying infrastructure and limited debugging capabilities pose challenges for diagnosing and resolving errors in serverless functions.
To address observability and debugging challenges in serverless architecture, developers can leverage specialized tools and best practices designed for monitoring and debugging serverless applications. These tools provide insights into function performance, resource utilization, and execution traces, enabling developers to identify and diagnose issues quickly. Additionally, adopting best practices such as instrumenting functions with logging and metrics, implementing distributed tracing, and incorporating automated testing and monitoring into the development lifecycle can enhance observability and facilitate effective debugging in serverless environments.
Conclusion
As we conclude our exploration of serverless architecture, it's evident that this paradigm shift in cloud computing offers a myriad of opportunities and challenges for developers and organizations. Let's recap the key points covered in this article, discuss future trends and considerations in serverless architecture, and encourage further exploration and adoption of serverless computing.
Throughout this article, we've delved into the core components, benefits, and challenges of serverless architecture:
Key Components: We examined fundamental components such as Function as a Service (FaaS), Backend as a Service (BaaS), and event-driven architecture, highlighting their roles and significance in serverless computing.
Benefits: We explored the cost-effectiveness, scalability, flexibility, and improved development velocity offered by serverless architecture, emphasizing its potential to streamline application development and deployment processes.
Challenges: We identified challenges such as cold start latency, vendor lock-in, and observability and debugging complexities, underscoring the importance of addressing these issues to fully realize the benefits of serverless computing.
Looking ahead, several trends and considerations are poised to shape the future of serverless architecture:
Advancements in Technology: Continued advancements in cloud technology, such as improvements in function execution performance, enhanced developer tooling, and support for emerging use cases like edge computing and machine learning, are expected to further propel the adoption of serverless architecture.
Hybrid and Multi-cloud Deployments: Organizations may increasingly embrace hybrid and multi-cloud strategies to mitigate vendor lock-in and leverage the strengths of multiple cloud providers. Serverless platforms that offer interoperability and compatibility across different cloud environments are likely to gain traction [10].
Focus on Observability and DevOps Practices: Enhanced observability tools and practices, along with robust DevOps processes tailored for serverless
environments, will be essential for ensuring reliability, performance, and security in serverless applications.
As serverless architecture continues to evolve, it presents exciting opportunities for innovation and growth. I encourage developers and organizations to embrace serverless computing and explore its potential to drive agility, scalability, and cost-efficiency in application development. By staying informed about emerging trends, experimenting with new technologies, and sharing insights and best practices within the community, we can collectively shape the future of serverless computing and unlock new possibilities in the cloud.
In conclusion, serverless architecture represents a transformative approach to building and deploying applications, offering numerous benefits and opportunities for innovation. By understanding its key principles, addressing its challenges, and embracing its potential, we can harness the power of serverless computing to create scalable, responsive, and cost-effective solutions that drive business success in the digital age.
References
[1 ] Hamza, M. (2023). Software Architecture Design of a Serverless System, In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '23). Association for Computing Machinery, 304-306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593471.
Zijun, L. (2022). The Serverless Computing Survey: A Technical Primer for Design Architecture, ACM Computing Surveys, 54(10s), 1 -34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508360.
Ngo, K. L., Mukherjee, J., Jiang, Z. M., & Litoiu, M. (2022). Evaluating the scalability and
elasticity of Function as a Service platform. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE '22) (pp. 117-124).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3489525.3511682.
Paul, J. J. (2023). Distributed Serverless Architectures on AWS: Design and Implement Serverless Architecture. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9159-7.
Rocha, H. F. O. (2022). Practical Event-Driven Microservices Architecture: Building
Sustainable and Highly Scalable Event-Driven Microservices. Apress.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1 -4842-7468-2.
Baldini, I., Cheng, P., Fink, S. J., Mitchell, N., Muthusamy, V., Rabbah, R., Suter, P., & Tardieu, O. (2017). The serverless trilemma: function composition for serverless computing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward! 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133850.3133855.
Cloudflare. What is vendor lock-in? | Vendor lock-in and cloud computing. Retrieved March 16, from https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/cloud/what-is-vendor-lock-in/
Ma, P., Shi, P., & Yi, G. (2023). Feature and Performance Comparison of FaaS
Platform, IEEE 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS58500.2023.10293015
Liu, X., Wen, J., Chen, Z., Li, D., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Jin, X. (2023). FaaSLight: General application-level cold-start latency optimization for Function-as-a-Service in serverless computing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(5), Article 119, 1 -29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585007
Google Cloud. What is hybrid cloud? Retrieved March 16, from https://cloud.google.com/learn/what-is-hybrid-cloud
Размещено на Allbest.ru/
...Подобные документы
Consideration of a systematic approach to the identification of the organization's processes for improving management efficiency. Approaches to the identification of business processes. Architecture of an Integrated Information Systems methodology.
реферат [195,5 K], добавлен 12.02.2016Review of development of cloud computing. Service models of cloud computing. Deployment models of cloud computing. Technology of virtualization. Algorithm of "Cloudy". Safety and labor protection. Justification of the cost-effectiveness of the project.
дипломная работа [2,3 M], добавлен 13.05.2015The need for Colvir's functional modules to avoid the costs of training and to facilitate modification and interaction of system components. Description and practical use of Citrix server and CyberPlat - integrated universal banking online payments.
доклад [505,3 K], добавлен 05.09.2011Программные средства для автоматизации строительного черчения. AutoCAD Architecture 2008 для архитектуры, строительства. Этапы создания блоков. Работа с пользовательскими штриховками. Раздел испытаний программного продукта, его экономическое обоснование.
дипломная работа [5,2 M], добавлен 21.06.2012Шина як набір проводів (ліній), що з'єднує різні компоненти комп'ютера для підведення до них живлення й обміну даними. Огляд різних типів шин, їх особливості, недоліки та переваги. Порівняльна характеристика головних відмінностей, майбутнє розвитку шин.
доклад [117,3 K], добавлен 26.09.2009Кодовые названия процессоров Core 2: Conroe, Merom, Kentsfield и Penryn. Архитектура Core Micro Architecture. Краткое сравнение микроархитектур Intel Core и AMD K8. Аналитический обзор процессоров на базе ядра Conroe: тактовая частота и ценовой диапазон.
реферат [1,4 M], добавлен 15.11.2014Description of a program for building routes through sidewalks in Moscow taking into account quality of the road surface. Guidelines of working with maps. Technical requirements for the program, user interface of master. Dispay rated pedestrian areas.
реферат [3,5 M], добавлен 22.01.2016Технології об'єктно-орієнтованого аналізу та проектування інформаційних систем. Історія та структура мови UML. Опис функціональної моделі засобами UML. Використання UML в проектуванні програмного забезпечення. Характеристика CASE-засобів Visual Paradigm.
дипломная работа [7,9 M], добавлен 26.05.2012Написание тестирующей программы для проверки знаний учащихся с помощью языка программирования Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), встроенного в пакет Microsoft Office. Общие сведения о программе, условия ее выполнения, настройка, проверка, выполнение.
контрольная работа [25,2 K], добавлен 07.06.2010Функции и основная роль коммерческого банка. Особенности кредитных и депозитных операций. Описание среды программирования и сущность Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). Схема алгоритма программы, процедура сохранения файла и выхода из программы.
курсовая работа [1,9 M], добавлен 04.04.2012Сумма двух разреженных полиномов, заданных ненулевыми коэффициентами и их номерами. Разработка программ на языке программирования Visual Basic for Applications. Вывод справочной информации. Операционная система Windows. Хранение двоичных данных.
научная работа [390,2 K], добавлен 09.03.2009Рождение и развитие Basic. Краткое описание Visual Basic for Applications. Новые возможности Visual Basic 5.0. Пример взаимодействия Excel и Visual Basic. Программирование табличных функций. Встраивание, применение функций. Формы, средства управления OLE.
реферат [20,7 K], добавлен 11.03.2010Теория тестирования. Тест как система заданий и его эффективности. Качество тестовых заданий. Проверка качества тестовых заданий. Матрица результатов. Современный подход к понятию "трудность". Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). Объектные модели.
дипломная работа [198,9 K], добавлен 10.11.2008Назначение и основные функции Ехсе1. Причины возникновения ошибок и способы их решения в Ехсе1. Язык программирования Visual Basic for Applications (VBA): общая характеристика языка. Основные понятия информационной безопасности, способы ее нарушения.
шпаргалка [201,2 K], добавлен 26.02.2010Математическая основа параллельных вычислений. Свойства Parallel Computing Toolbox. Разработка параллельных приложений в Matlab. Примеры программирования параллельных задач. Вычисление определенного интеграла. Последовательное и параллельное перемножение.
курсовая работа [1,1 M], добавлен 15.12.2010Основи проектування мобільного додатку для операційної системи Android з використанням хмарної бази даних Cloud Firestore. Аналіз основних труднощів, які виникають під час розробки додатків. Визначення основних переваг та недоліків хмарних баз даних.
статья [195,3 K], добавлен 07.02.2018Описание бизнес-процесса "Химчистка" в визуальной среде Visual Paradigm UML 2.0. Основные виды взаимодействия между актерами и вариантами использования. Составление диаграммы классов, последовательности, коммуникаций и состояний. Кодогенерация на Delphi.
контрольная работа [1,4 M], добавлен 04.04.2011Модели обслуживания облачных технологий (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS). Определение облачных технологий, их основные характеристики, достоинства и недостатки. Функции и возможности облачного решения Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud от "Лаборатории Касперского".
курсовая работа [626,7 K], добавлен 29.06.2017Анализ существующих программ трехмерного моделирования. Сравнение программ для создания трехмерной графики. Технологии трехмерного моделирования в Cinema 4D. Проект создания текстовой анимации на основе инструментов "Organicball", "Formula" и "Cloud".
дипломная работа [2,4 M], добавлен 14.11.2017Автоматизация работы наркологической службы, обеспечение быстрого поиска и подачи информации из базы. Выбор инструментальных средств. Алгоритм работы разрабатываемого веб-ресурса. Диаграмма базы в Visual Paradigm for UM, визуализация веб-приложения.
контрольная работа [1,2 M], добавлен 11.12.2012