Розвиток організаційного вивчення і впровадження досвіду у Збройних Силах України та його ефективність під час російсько-української війни на Донбасі (2014-2021)

Розгляд історичних аспектів розвитку формальних процесів організаційного вивчення та впровадження досвіду у Збройних Силах України. Підвищення ефективності процесів, спрямованих на імплементацію у діяльність найкращої світової практики під час війни.

Рубрика Военное дело и гражданская оборона
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 20.05.2024
Размер файла 41,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

MSR 2020. Military Scientific Research, final report, code “DOSVID-ZSV”, 2020. State registration № 0120u102708. Lviv, National Army Academy, 2020. 126 p. (ukr.).

Pashchuk Y., Pashkovsky V. (2019). Methodological approach to forming a prospective lessons learned system in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Science and Technology of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, No. 4 (37): 36-43. (ukr.).

Pashchuk Y. (2021). Historical aspects of organizational learning in the Armed Forces of Ukraine in peacetime (1991-2014). Military Scientific Bulletin of the National Army Academy. Issue 35, Lviv, NAA, 2021: 44-57. (ukr.).

Plan 2018. Plan to create a prospective lessons learned system in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Approved by the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on 27.11.2018. 7 p. (ukr.).

Protocol 2014. Protocol of the meeting of the leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the creation of a system for analyzing and summarizing experiences in the UAF. 27 January 2014. Kyiv: Military-Scientific Department of the UaF General Staff, 5 p. (ukr.).

Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (eng).

Bukkvoll, T. 2019. “Fighting on Behalf of the State: The Issue of Pro-Government Militia Autonomy in the Donbas War.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (4): 293-307. (eng).

Bukkvoll, T. and V. Solovian. 2020. “The Threat of War and Domestic Restraints to Defence Reform: How Fear of Major Military Conflict Changed and Did Not Change the Ukrainian Military 2014-2019.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 21-38. (eng).

Burnham, P. et al. 2004. Research Methods in Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (eng).

Chumak, V. and A, Razumtsev. 2004. “Ukrainian Participation in Peacekeeping: The Yugoslavian Experience.” In Warriors in Peacekeeping: Points of Tension in Complex Cultural Encounters. A Comparative Study Based on Experiences in Bosnia edited by J. Callaghan and M. Schonborn. Munster: LIT Verlag. (eng).

Croissant, A. and D. Kuehn (eds). 2017. Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies. Berlin: Springer. (eng).

De Long, D. and Fahey, L. 2000. “Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management.” Academy of Management Executive 14 (4): 113-127. (eng).

Dyson, T. 2019. Organisational Learning and the Modern Army: A New Model for Lessons-Learned Processes. Abingdon: Routledge. (eng).

Dyson T. and Pashchuk Y. (2022). Organisational learning during the Donbas War: the development of Ukrainian Armed Forces lessons-learned processes, Defence Studies, Volume 22, 2022 - Issue 2: 141-167. (eng).

Foley, R., et al 2011. Transformation in Contact: Learning the Lessons of Modern War. International Affairs 82 (2): 253-270. (eng).

Grant, G. 2021. Seven Years of Deadlock: Why Ukraine's Military Reforms are Going Nowhere and How the US Should Respond. The Jamestown Foundation https://jamestown.org/program/why-the-ukrainian-defense-system-fails-to-reform-why- us-support-is-less-than-optimal-and-what-can-we-do-better/. [Date accessed 3 August 2021]. (eng).

Griffin, S. 2017. Military Innovation Studies: Multidisciplinary or Lacking Discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40 (1-2): 196-224. (eng).

Jans, N. 2013. “Getting on the Same Net: How the Theory-Driven Academic Can Better Communicate with the Pragmatic Military Client.” In Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies edited by J. Soeters et al. Abingdon Routledge. (eng).

Kaihko, I. 2018. A Nation-in-the-Making, in Aims: Control of Force, Strategy and the Ukrainian Volunteer Battalions. Defence Studies 18 (2): 147-166. (eng).

Kelly, K.P. and J. Johnson-Freese, 2014. Getting to the Goal in Professional Military Education. Orbis 58 (1): 119-131. (eng).

Kiszely, J. 2013. The British Army and Thinking about the Operational Level. In British Generals in Blair's Wars, edited by J. Bailey, R. Iron and H. Strachan, 119-131. Aldershot: Ashgate. (eng).

Marcus, R. 2015. Military Innovation and Tactical Adaptation in the Israel- Hizballah Conflict: The Institutionalization of Lesson-Learning in the IDF. Journal of Strategic Studies 38 (4): 500-528. (eng).

Mosser, M. 2010. Puzzles vs. Problems: The Alleged Disconnect between Academics and Military Practitioners. Perspectives on Politics 8 (4): 1078-1080. (eng).

NATO LL 2016. NATO Lesson Learned Handbook Third Edition, 2016. Lisbon: Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre. 81 p. (eng).

NATO JA 2016. Joint Analysis Handbook, 4th Edition, 2016. Lisbon: Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre. 135 p. (eng).

NRU 2020. NATO Representation to Ukraine. Letter NRU 2020/082, Kyiv, Ukraine, 21 August 2020. 10 p. (eng).

Pedler, M., T. Boydell, and J. Burgoyne. 1989. Towards the Learning Company. Management Education and Development, 20 (1): 1-8. (eng).

Perla, P. and E.D. McGrady. 2011. Why Wargaming Works. Naval War College Review 64 (3): 111-130. (eng).

Ploumis, M. 2020. Mission Command and Philosophy for the 21st Century. Comparative Strategy 39 (2): 209-218. (eng).

Puglisi, R. 2015. General Zhukov and the Cyborgs: A Clash of Civilisation within the UAF. Instituto Affair Internazionali Working Paper 15 (14): 1-22. (eng).

Puglisi, R. 2017. Institutional Failure and Civic Activism: The Potential for Democratic Control in post-Maidan Ukraine. In Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies edited by A. Criossant and J. Kuehn, 41-61. Berlin: Springer. (eng).

Rathburn, B. 2008. A Rose by Any Other Name? Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism. Security Studies 71 (2): 294321. (eng).

Sanders, D. 2017. The War We Want; The War That We Get: Ukraine's Military Reform and the Conflict in the East. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 30 (1): 30-49. (eng).

Sangar, E. 2016. The Pitfalls of Learning from Historical Experience: The British Army's Debate on Useful Lessons for the War in Afghanistan. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (2): 223-245. (eng).

Serena, C. 2011. A Revolution in Military Adaptation: The US Army in the Iraq War. Washington: Georgetown University Press. (eng).

Soeters, J. et al. 2014. Introduction. In Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies edited by J. Soeters et al. Abingdon: Routledge. (eng).

Van der Vorm, M. 2021. War's Didactics: A Theoretical Explanation on How Militaries Learn from Conflict. Research Paper 177. Breda: Netherlands Defence Academy. (eng).

Wilk A. 2017. The Best Army Ukraine Has Ever Had: Changes in Ukraine's Armed Forces since the Russian Aggression. Warsaw: Centre for East Studies. 66: 1-44. (eng).

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.