Theoretical base of economical significance of small business
Regulatory framework analysis. Structure and forms of small business government support. Russian and international experience. Statistical and survey data. Methodological research of socio-economical development impact. Financing of measures of support.
Рубрика | Экономика и экономическая теория |
Вид | дипломная работа |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 12.06.2016 |
Размер файла | 751,5 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/
[Введите текст]
INTRODUCTION
Small business development in all countries is a powerful lever for solving complex political, financial, economic and social problems, which appeared in the formation of a progressive structure of the economy and competitive environment; expanding the tax base for the budgets of all levels; increase in gross domestic product; reducing unemployment and providing employment through the creation of new business and job places; reducing the size of social transfers, market saturation with various goods and services.
Market efficiency and mobility is impossible without deep specialization and cooperation, which in its turn is provided by small business. They are able to fill a niche in the consumer society, but also to create conditions for healthy competition, without which the development of a market economy is impossible.
In the market economy small business is the most dynamic sector of the economy, because small businesses are able to quickly reflect changes in the markets of goods and services. Small businesses are the most vulnerable to changes in global and local markets. Usually changes in the market are caused by the termination of small businesses activity, which leads to a radical reorientation of their economic performance.
It should be noted that in all market economies, there are programs of government small business support. State support of small business is a separate area of economic policy, the implementation of which requires the establishment of an appropriate institutional system including public authorities with specific tasks, functions and powers in the sphere of small business.
The importance of the discussed problem emphasizes by the fact that in Russia there is not developed infrastructure of small enterprises support which greatly hinders the development of this problem. According to the Chairman of the Commission on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, "The country's economy is largely gone from the efforts of small and medium-sized business. In Russia, there are no suitable conditions for its development. There are not enough investors in the market. Moreover potential entrepreneurs do not open their business. They do not understand their rules, mechanisms of assistance and support".
State support for small businesses in a broad sense is a system of financial, economic, organizational and legal and social services for the effective operation and development of small business.
In the context of conducted fiscal reform, the transition to budgeting, results-oriented, the special ascent of budgetary funds is placed on the effectiveness of its use. Therefore, in terms of state support of small business also raises the question of indicators of the effectiveness ofthis policy implementation.
Analyzing the existing practice of assessing the effectiveness of public support, we can conclude that in Russia today there is no specific methodology for calculating the level of influence of any government support measures.
Thus, the purpose of this paper is to search the relation between measures of small business support and target indicators of socio-economic development of small business and to propose measures to increase the impact of government support on the example of government support in Moscow.
In addition, the experience of developed countries will be analyzed and contributed to the study of this problem and proposes solutions how to modernize the system of state support for small and medium-sized businesses in Russia. Thus, hypothesis of this paper isan assumption, that measures of government small business support have poor interconnection that causes heterogeneity of influence on socio-economic indicators.
In this tern, small business support in the USA and Japan is the most interesting because in these countries small companies produce almost half of the volume of output, as well as create more than 75% of new jobs. Small business in this country is the basis of market infrastructure.
The object of the study is the small business sector, while the subject of the research is government support of small business in Russia and abroad.
To achieve this goal it is necessary to perform the following tasks:
To analyze the development of small business in Russia;
To analyze measures of small business government support in Moscow
To find the most and the less effective measure of small business government support through correlation method.
To research methods of ineffective measures modification;
To make practical recommendations for Moscow government small business support.
Methodological and theoretical foundations of the research are scientific works of Russian and foreign authors in the field of small business development.
The methodology of the research is statistical analysis thought quantitative and qualitative method of data collecting, correlation method of data calculation.
Among the sources of information used in this research are:
a) scientific sources: data and information from books, journal articles, scientific papers and reports;
b) statistical sources: domestic and foreign statistical materials, reports of state, regional, departmental statistics.
1. THEORETICAL BASE OF ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF SMALL BUSINESS
Development the small business sector is an important part of successful growth of any state economy, growth in production efficiency, market supplementation of necessary goods and services and the improvement of living standards, not only in Russia, but also in the advanced economies. While small businesses may not generate as much money as large corporations, they are a critical component of and major contributor to the strength of local economies. Small businesses present new employment opportunities and serve as the building blocks of the largest corporations.
Therefore, the issues of small business development are critical in programs of de-monopolization of national economies.
Development of small business is one of the factors in the way of formation of thesocio-economic development strategy of the region and at the same time it depends on the efficiency of the state support of small business sector.
There are a lot of research literature which interpreted links between entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. (Bosma & Nieuwenhuijsen 2000; Reynolds 1999; Caves 1998, p. 1973; Acs & Armington 2002; Audretsch& Fritsch 2002; Audretschet al. 2002). These studies observe influential level of small business activity in city, region and the state. Region that has a higher share of small business in comparison with other regions is considered to have higher small business activity and consequently experienced in terms of higher economic growth. The impact of number of market participants in any industry has the same consideration where an increase in the number of small enterprises is usually related to more intensive activity and subsequently higher economic growth. (Glaeser et al.1992; Nickell 1996;Nicolitsas & Dryden 1997; Lever & Nieuwenhuijsen 1999; Geroski 1989).
It must be highlighted that characteristic feature of central planned economy implies the absence of small business or private ownership. This is one of the major factor that led to the collapse of state socialism (Acs & Audretsch 1987; Prusa & Schmitz 1991 and Rothwell 1983, 1984).
Analysis of existing studiesabout links between entrepreneurship activity and economic growth revealed that they were restrictedto two units of research - at the level of enterprise and for regions but not country(Caree & Thurik, 2002; Audretsch 1995; Caves 1998).It also mast be noted that was positively and significantly related to economic growth, however, these studies analyze western countries and not examine the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth for developing countries.
Carree & Thurik (1998, 1999a) examined the influence of the share of small firms in manufacturing industriesin European countries on the economic growth in 1990 and found that they had a positive and significant effect on the industrialoutput growth. Moreover, its findings indicated that excess growth of small firms had a great impact in changes in gross national product for a sample of 16 European countries from 1988 to 1993.
Furthermore, Robbins(2000) performed an analysis of 48 of the 50 United States of America for the period from 1986to 1995 and found that states that had a higher proportion of small enterprises employmentexperienced higher level of productivity growth and gross state product.
Audstretch & Keilbach (2002) hypothesized that regions with greater level of small business capitalexhibited higher output for German regions,ceteris paribus. They specified the following intrinsicallylinear model to link entrepreneurship to economic growth:
Where:
Kis a physical labor,
L is labor
R is knowledge capital
E is entrepreneurship
Henderson (2006) analyzed the relationship between entrepreneurship activity and economic growth for the period from 1980 to 1990 by regressing employment level for U.S.A counties on various characteristics of a county that was believed to influence economic growth as shown in equationbelow:
Where:
EMP (1991-2001) is the county's employment growth rate from 1991 to 2001;
Eis entrepreneurship
Lis labor
Iis infrastructure
Uis agglomeration,
T is taxes
A is special characteristics of the county.
Henderson (2006) distinguished his study from others by dividing entrepreneurship into two majormeasures of entrepreneurship based on proprietor following data levels: the average share of non-farmemployment in the county by non-farm proprietors, the average annual growth rate inentrepreneurs where three measures of entrepreneurship were used to test the hypothesis, namely theaverage number of per capita new business start-ups, the average number of per capita new business thatsurvived five years, the average number of per capita new business start-ups that produced high growthduring the first five years of operation.
Moreover, modern world practice has proved that small business plays an important role in the economy and its state support makes social, economic and budgetary effect. In Western Europe, the USA, Japan small businesses provide two thirds of growth of new jobs; in the EU share of small and medium-sized businesses in the GDP exceeds 50%.
Data of the contribution of small and medium-sized enterprises in the economy of the advanced industrial countries are presented in Appendix 1.Russia is characterized by low supply of small and medium-sized businesses and their insignificant contribution to GDP, suggesting the lack of effectiveness and efficiency of policies to support small businesses.
Nowadays development and the role of small business in the Russian economy are under public scrutiny. However, small business as the way of life for millions of people does not have deep historical roots. Russian entrepreneurship did not appear by the evolutionary way, as in the traditional market economies, but as a result of economic transformation “from above”, at the end of the collapse of centrally planned economic system of the state.
The scale of development of small business in Russia and its contribution to economic recovery today is clearly not sufficient. However, it should be noted the impressive achievements in a concerted effort to support entrepreneurship, which means a positive attitude towards the private sector in the country.
For example, increasing popularity has business incubators, industrial parks and other forms of support. Today, the corresponding indicator of the Russian business environment is more favorable than it was ten years ago.
In addition, taking into consideration the fact that the country embarked on the path of market economy only in 1990s, Russia has made ??significant progress in the development of entrepreneurship. In comparison with other countries included in the study of EY «Barometer entrepreneurship G20» in 2013, Russia has shown good results, indicating progress in creating an enabling environment for business, which was made in recent years.Entrepreneurs has opportunities due to the development of the consumer market, the growth of disposable income, the presence of abundant natural resources and a highly skilled workforce.
1.1 Regulatory framework analysis
National policy in the sphere of small business support was started at the end of 1999 where government of the Russian Federation adopted Resolution N1460 "On the complex of measures for the development and state support of small and medium enterprises in the sphere of material production and promote their innovative activity", which stated that this kind of support is the most important of the activities of federal executive bodies. A list of supported industries was quite extensive, that is why there was a number of ministries and executive authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation, which was instructed to ensure the implementation of measures aimed at such support.
In the Russian Federation the main document that regulates the particular legal status and activities of small enterprises is federal law of 24.07.2007. N209 “Development of small and medium enterprises in the Russian Federation”. This law marked the new stage of regulation the relations between government and individuals in the development of SMEs.
The law defines the main terms used in the regulation of relations in the development of SMEs, the concept of SME, SME support infrastructure, types and forms of such support.
Adoption of this law was a symbolic because it has comparable legislation of the development of small and medium enterprises with the countries of the European Union - the main trade partner of Russia, equalizing criteria for the classification of business entities for SMEs. Based on the world experience, which shows that medium business has the same significance for the effective development of the economy, the new legislation signed a new term “medium business”.
Also, the Federal Law № 209-FZ of the main principles of the division of powers authorities at various levels for the development of SMEs, harmonized criteria for the sector of small and medium-sized companies, to ensure equal access of small businesses to government support, and a mechanism for considering the opinion of representatives of employers in making regulations.
In accordance with the law public authorities and local governments are required to provide support to SMEs in innovation and industrial production through forming the infrastructure of SMEs support. Innovation organizations are parks, centers of technology commercialization, technology development and scientific-industrial zone.
Government resolution of October 13, 2008 N 753 "On amendments to Certain Acts of the Russian Federation regarding the powers of the federal bodies of executive power in the sphere of small and medium business" are defined executive authorities, which are obliged to develop measures to support the subjects SMEs, including the development of relevant departmental target programs in the established field of activity. Among these executive bodies there are the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Federal Agency for Science and Innovation , Federal Agency for Education , the Federal Agency for Information Technology , Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation , Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications , etc.
Besides the basic legal framework of small business support in Russia , it was adopted other important laws, such as:
N135 "On protection of competition", 26 July 2006 (with amendments of December 1, 2007, April 29, June 30, November 8, 2008, July 17, December 27, 2009, April 5 May 8, November 29, 2010, March 1, June 27, 1, 11, 18 July 2011);
N195"On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation with regard to the formation of favorable tax conditions for the financing of innovation", July 19, 2007;
N294 "On protection of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs in the implementation of state control (supervision) and municipal control", 26 December 2008;
President resolution of May 15, 2008 N797 "On urgent measures to eliminate administrative barriers to entrepreneurial activity.";
Government resolution of 17 March 2008 № 178 "On the Government Commission on the development of small and medium-sized businesses." and other legislative acts.
Thus, it can be definitely claimed that the system of regulation of small business was born 15 years ago, that is incomparable with the United States or European Union countries where regulation system of small business was started 65 years ago.
1.2 Structure and forms of small business government support
State support for small businesses in a broad sense is a system of financial, economic, organizational and legal and social services for the effective operation and development of small business.
In the context of conducted fiscal reform, the transition to budgeting, results-oriented, the specialascent of budgetary funds is placed on the effectiveness of its use. Therefore, in terms of state support of small and medium-sized businesses also raises the question of indicators of the effectiveness of this policyimplementation.
The most important principle of organization of state policy towards small business is and target orientation, which involves the development of programs to support small business development, which should be clearly presents the expected results of the program and the amount of resource support.
Targeted programs of small businesssupport and development focus on the coherence and effectiveness of government in order to create more favorable conditions for the development of small businesses in Russia in general and in particular in the regions.
In order to overcome problems of small business development in Russia, it was created the infrastructure of small business support which represents a set of public, non-governmental, public, educational and commercial organizations that regulate the activities of companies providing various services necessary for the development of small business and providing the environment and conditions for the production of goods and services. One of the key elements of small business support infrastructure is a public authority at all levels where the main federal body coordination functions of state support in the small business sector is Ministry of Economic Development.
Besides the “public” element of infrastructure, there are some bodies small business support, engaged in structures that interact directly with small businesses.
The main functions of the business support body include:
Financial support (assistance in getting a loan, giving subsidies, loans etc);
Technical and informational support (consultation services, mentors' support, providing by the angel investors etc).
In order to implement the state policy in the sphere of small and medium enterprises in the Russian Federation there were created federal laws and other normative legal acts which are foreseen:
Special tax regimes, simplified rules of tax accounting, simplified tax return forms for certain taxes and fees for small businesses;
Simplified system of accounting for small businesses engaged in certain activities;
Simplified procedure for preparation by small and medium-sized businesses statistical reports;
Preferential order of payment for privatized small and medium enterprise state and municipal property;
Special conditions of participation of small businesses in competitions for placing orders for the good supply, works and services for state and municipal needs;
measures to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of small and medium-sized enterprises in the implementation of state control (supervision);
Measures to ensure financial support of small and medium enterprises;
measures to develop the infrastructure of small and medium-sized businesses, etc.
For each subject of the Russian Federation was developed a separate target program for the development of small entrepreneurship. Subjects of the Russian Federation have unequal socio-economic development that prevent to consider the impact of government support measures for the development small business in Russia as a whole.In this connection it is necessary to highlight the region of Russia, which has the highest socio-economic development in order to compare it with foreign practices of developed countries.According to the research center of RIA-Novosti "RIArating" first place in the socio-economic development occupies the city of Moscow.(Appendix 2)
In the result of analysis of the Moscow target programs, it can be highlighted the following measures of government small business support:
Complex provision small business by the systems of small business support;
Improving infrastructure of small businesses support;
Support of prior directions of small business;
Providing small business by uninhabited premises in the administrative districts;
Financial support of small business;
Information and consulting support of small business;
Training support;
Support in expanding of business opportunities of small business.
The aim of small business complex provision by the systems of small business supportmeasures is addressing to provide needs of complex urban systems of small business support in order to improve the environment of business development, to form of the legal space, providing unhindered development of the small business sector.
In order to implement the measures of state support for small business in Moscow the special structure was created, which can perform government tasks to support the business. Thus, the next measure of small business support is addressing to improving the government infrastructure of small business support.
Support of the priority directions of small business development involves financial, property and other support for those activities that have the most favorable impact on the socio-economic situation in the region. According to Knyazev D.A., deputy head of the Department of Science, Industrial Policy and Entrepreneurship in Moscow "City are primarily interested in enterprises engaged in manufacturing, innovation sphere, housing and communal services, social and consumer services, transportation, agriculture and tourism industry and others. There are 14 priority activities."
Ensuring small business by non-residential premises in administrative districts of Moscow implies property support of small business. The objective of this measure is to provide a right to preferential rental rates for small enterprises, rent of nonresidential property located in the treasury of Moscow, under existing lease agreements without competitive bidding.
The purpose of the financial support of small business is providing entrepreneurs by grants (subsidies) to develop the business. Financial support programs and allocations in various targeted programs are heterogeneous and depend on the medium-term strategic objectives of the subject of the Russian Federation. Thus, the target program for 2010-2012 identifies the following types of subsidies:
Innovative projects support;
Start-up project support;
Priority activities support;
Youth entrepreneurshipsupports;
Supporting of small business who have credit contrasts with banks;
Supporting of small business who have signed contracts of financial rent;
Providing subsidies to compensate a bank guaranteefor small and medium business;
Providing grants to compensate part of costs of small and medium-sized businesses on contracts for connection to the electrical and utility networks;
Providing grants to compensate part of costs of small and medium enterprises for the production and certification of products (ISO, GMP), the development of industrial design and trademark.
Microfinancing support
Information and consulting support of small businessare provided through the preparation and posting information on the specialized informational Internet resources, as well as by establishing and supporting the functioning of these resources. Moreover this measure is functioned through the establishing specialized multi-service centers authorized to provide advice to small businesses on any question of doing business.
Expanding business opportunities of small business consists in searching fordomestic and foreignmarkets and partners, in order to small business development and promotion of Russian producers of goods and services abroad.
In 2012, the volume of public expenditure to measures of small business support in Moscow is about 20 million rubles, which is two times more than in 2001(Appendix 3). . Furthermore, due to the fact of increase in the expected performance of socially and economical significant indicators and in the budget allocation, we can assume that the logic of the government policy in the sphere of small business support is relatively proportional increasing in the business environment per unit of input budget.
Also in terms of researching state measures of small business support it must be noted the traditional task of budget spending - task of improving the efficiency of budgetary spending in order to achieve maximum results (creation of new jobs, increased tax revenues from small businesses, increase in the share of small enterprises in total GRP, etc.) with minimal support of small entrepreneurship, which is based on a mathematical approach to performance indicators.
In this regard, in setting targets to maximize the effectiveness of the implementation of government programs to support small business development it is offered to take into consideration the following aspects:
Achieving maximum results for a certain level of limited budgetary resources;
Achieving a minimum flow of budgetary resources for a given level of the final result.
Implementation of these requirements can be suggested as conditions of improving the efficiency of the executive authorities of the region and the implementation of government programs to support small business development, because they guarantee the maximum results at the minimum cost, taking into account constraints on the objectives and financial resources.
Thus, the activities of the authorities can be considered effective if it revealed that budget expenditures and achieved their results using the specific objectives set by the executive authorities in the development of programs to support small business.
In conclusion to chapter 1 it is important to highlight that according to numerous studies, small business plays an important role in terms of forming the market economy of the state. Development the small business sector is an important part of successful growth of any state economy, growth in production efficiency, market supplementation of necessary goods and services and the improvement of living standards, not only in Russia, but also in the advanced economies.
While small businesses may not generate as much money as large corporations, they are a critical component of and major contributor to the strength of local economies.
Small businesses present new employment opportunities and serve as the building blocks of the largest corporations.- J. Mariah Brown)
In Russia for a long time dominated the planned economy, which does not imply the development of small business. Concerning this fact, small business development began in the late of 20th century, the regulatory framework governing the rules of small business support appeared only 2007.
Today in Russia there are many programs of small business support, which means that the Russian Federation took the path of creating the sustainable market economy. However in order to consider the adequacy of existing measures of government support it is necessary to consider the best international practice.
2. RUSSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Researching the international experience is an important study in terms of observing the issue of different parties. In this tern, small business support in the USA and Japan is the most interesting because in both countries small companies produce almost half of the volume of output, as well as create more than 75% of new jobs. Small business in these countries is the basis of market infrastructure. Moreover, these countries represent two opposing cultures, east and west, which allows to consider the problem from different sides.
The role of small business sector in every country can be considered through the following characteristics:
The number of small businesses (and entrepreneurs) in total share of economic actors;
Gross domestic product produced by small businesses, and its share in GDP in a particular region of the country or of the country as a whole;
Amount of taxes and fees paid by small businesses, and their share in the formation of regional and federal budgets;
The number of workers employed by small businesses full-time and part-time or temporarily employed under civil contracts;
Efficiency of small businesses that can be assessed through indicators of financial performance of enterprises;
Contribution of small businesses to market saturation in consumer goods (works, services) and the needs of the population. This indicator can be used only in those countries where a small business is developed on the insufficient level. In countries where small business has a significant segment of the economy, small business is built into the economic system of society, not only as a manufacturer of consumer goods, but also as a manufacturer of an extensive range of components for large industrial companies.
2.1 Statistical and survey data of small business development in Russia
Currently, the development of small business in Russia is controversial. On the one hand, the declared objective of creating conditions for its development, and the media give some positive examples. On the other, government statistics show that the development of small business is not always successful. The results are significantly different both in industry and activities, and by region of the country. Inconsistency of Russian small business development can be noticed by the state statistics (Appendix 4).
Since 2002, the main indicators of small business development had been increased. This trend had been continued until 2009, until negative effects of the global financial and economic crisis. At the end of 2010 in Russia there were more than 1.6 million units of small businesses, that is larger than in 2000. At the beginning of 2005, the volume of products produced by small businesses, increased compared to 2001 by more than 2.5 times. The number of jobs provided by the small business to the population significantly increased. Thus, at the beginning of 2010 small business employed more than 10.2 million of permanent workers. However in 2011 the number of registered small enterprises in Russia for the year decreased by 3.6%, the average number of employees at the small enterprises fell 2.9%, while the share of employment for small enterprises in total average number of employees was reduced by 0.14 percentage points. The reduced level of activity can be described by the result of the financial and economic crisis, and a sharp increase in the tax burden of small business.
Thus, it can be assumed that by 2008 there was a significant stabilization of production teams of small businesses. However from 2010 to 2013, figures begin to decline due to the tightening of federal legislation, as well as the effects the financial crisis.
The most significant advantage of the small business is the flexibility of small enterprises in comparison with the large enterprises in productive activities. Thus, in 2005 volume of the whole production and services exceeded 2229.0 bln. of rub. The total amount of investment , produced by small businesses every year in the period from 2000 to 2009 increased almost on 20 times.
Despite relatively positive trends of small business, in 2004 it provided only 11.4% of GDP(appendix 5). Since 2005, official statistics do not provide information about the role of small businesses in the country's GDP. In specialized periodical editions special term "turnover organizations" is using. Thus, in the period 2005 - 2008 turnover of small enterprises was about 26% of the total turnover of enterprises of the country. In 2009 this figure fell to 11.7%.
A positive aspect of small businesses can be called sustainable growth in fixed capital investment. Thus, in 2000-2008 investment in fixed assets increased from 29.8 billion rubles in 2000 to 472.3 billion rubles in 2008 - almost in 16 times. But over the last year there was a decrease index for 126.2 billion rubles or for 26.7%. Also it is important to note the fact of increasing the share of small firms in total investment in fixed assets: from 2.9% in 2000 to 5.4% in 2008, although it remains disappointingly low.
Describing the overall formation of small business in Russia during the years of market reforms, it can be noted that there are no significant changes in the direction of its development. Thus, at the beginning of 2010 there were registered over 1602.5 thousand small enterprises, which was 11.3 companies per 1,000 people, while in the European Union, it ranges from 35 to 68.Data ofAppendix 6clearly indicate that the sectoral structure of small business in the analyzed period remained virtually unchanged.
Trade and services sphere are most preferred for small business. This can be explained by relatively less need for financial, labor and other resources and more rapid return on investment, which is very attractive for small business. In the period from 2005 to 2012 in trade sphere were more than 40% of all small businesses, but currently it has a negative trend. After the trade sphere real estate, manufacturing and construction occupies the theirs place. In agriculture, transport, housing, health, education and other sectors operates a small amount of small businesses. It should also be noted that, despite the rapid development of information technology in the last decade, the rapid growth of small businesses in the transport and communications sector is not observed. Nevertheless, the dynamics are definitely positive.
As a result, analysis of the structure of small enterprises by economic activity shows that a small business in Russia as a whole develops in areas that do not require much labor, material, intellectual and, especially financial resources. Sphere of material production as the primary sector value added, including, primarily, manufacturing, construction and mining, takes a modest place in both absolute and relative terms.
There are a lot of researches of small business environment. Some researchers noted that unequal status of small business in Russia and abroad are caused by many factors. Among them there are:
Imperfectsystemoftaxation.
Interaction problems small businesses with government agencies and administrative barriers.
Deficit working capital for business development.
Opacity of small businesses and criminals.
Property insecurity.
Problems of social and labor relations in small businesses.
Problems of integration of small businesses in the current economic relations.
Absence or limitations of the information structure and support small businesses.
Shortage of qualified personnel.
EY «Barometer entrepreneurship G20» in 2013 conducted a study of barriers to the development of small business in Russia and abroad. (Appendix 7). This study shows that performance in Russia is several times less than the average for the countries included in the big twenty.In its study EY «Barometer entrepreneurship G20» for the first time in 2013 analyzed the data through the scoring countries model with five criteria, reflecting the major factors in the development of entrepreneurship. With the help of this model it is possible to identify relative strengths side of small business development of each country and opportunities for improvement.
The model includes qualitative data (survey of more than 1500 entrepreneurs) and quantitative data, based on an assessment of the business environment in each of the "Big Twenty".For each criterion (except criterion coordinated work to support entrepreneurship) share of qualitative and quantitative information in determining the final score is taken in the ratio 50/50.Score of concerted effort to support entrepreneurship is determined on the base of responses due to the lack of appropriate quantitative indicators.
The survey data are an important complement to the basic picture, which gives statistics. In addition to the strict views of business statistics,it is recorded the opinion of entrepreneurs about the trends of improvement or deterioration of the business ecosystems in their respective countries (Appendix 8).
Moreover, according to the national research “Global monitor of entrepreneurship. Russia,2012”, it can be highlighted the following conclusions:
4.3% of Russians are now self-employed. Others - employees. In other countries, these rates are higher. Moreover, only 2 % of the population is ready to start their business;
Russians scare common problems: administrative barriers, lack of investment, high taxes, lack of grants and subsidies, and low survival of business, which indirectly reflects the fact that the business climate in the country is too severe.
In addition, in order to avoid the risk Russian entrepreneurs choose those areas of activity where they can provide rapid return on investment and do not involve significant costs. However, only in 2012 all went out of business 45% of entrepreneurs.
Thus, as it follows from the statistical analysis, we can conclude that the development of small business has a positive trend of development. On the one hand, basic economic indicators show the most significant growth, but on the other hand in comparison with other countries the level of the economic impact of small business on the development of the country as a whole is not so significant because the level of the share of small business in Russia's GDP is about 20%, whereas the EU average - about 50%. Moreover, surveys that was conducted among the business community, according to which only 2 % of the population is ready to start their business, demonstrate an unfavorable environment for business development, where the first place in the list of problems assigns to the lack of funding.
With the help of these findings it can be suggested the need for government intervention in the development of small business by improving its regulation in various.
2.2 International practices of small business support
USA occupies the most favorable places in the international rating “Doing business”, that is why it is important to observe the system of small business support in these countries in order not only to compare the structure of Russia and these countries, but also in order to give some recommendations of improvement measures of public support in future.
According to the definition of the Small Business Administration in the U.S., the company refers to small business if it employs fewer than 500 employees. Today in the United States was created about 27 million small businesses, and the proportion of small businesses and large corporations is 1162 to 1.
Small business is represented in many areas, such as manufacturing, trade, finance, social services and innovations. Moreover a significant contribution small business make to the development of science in the country: major discoveries and inventions in the U.S. were carried out within a small business. The small businesses began to develop the production of air transport, personal computers, household appliances, etc.
Small business employs about 57% of the workforce in the country and generates more than half of nonfarm private GDP. Typically, 60-80% of new jobs are created in small business, and this number varies each year, because some small companies grow and become large companies and at the same time creating new small business firms. For example, from 1999 to 2000 small businesses created about 75% of all new jobs.
Government support has a particular importance for the development of small business in the U.S. A. Basic principles of the country's support of small business were laid during the Great Depression, which began after the subsidizing SMEs who have suffered as a result of the war. It was very important because in that moment only small business was able to create basic jobs in the country. Thus, there are some federal programs that were created in 1932 in order to support small businesses.
Legislative framework of American small business is the Small Business Act, passed in 1953, which identified the importance of the public interest in helping and supporting small businesses. In the same year the U.S. Congress created Small Business Administration (SBA) in the United States, whose mission is to defend and protect the interests of small businesses at the governmental level. This organization provides consultation service, financial support and also helps small businesses get government contracts and contracts with major companies. Today SBA guarantees loans by the amount of $ 14 billion for small businesses. Usually, money sent to the formation of the working capital, purchase of buildings, equipment, etc. Another $ 2 billion SBA invests in small businesses in the form of venture capital. This body conducts sufficiently aggressive policy in order to find market opportunities for small enterprisers that have export potential. Working with various government agencies and universities, the SBA regulates about 900 Small Business Development Centers that provide technical and managerial assistance.
The Small Business Administration aims to support small business which is under the management of national minorities, particularly Africans, Asians and Hispanics. The basicс of these programs is the Equal Opportunity Act and the Act on public works and economic development. Thus, in 2007, more than 3 million of small enterprises were owned by members of national minorities. In addition, SBA is sponsoring a program in which retired businessmen offered assistance in managing new or distressed company. Another important program is the program of financial support for small businesses in cases of emergency, such as natural disasters, terrorist acts, etc.
In case of globalized market relations scientific and technical progress is one of the key factors of economic competitiveness. Therefore, the U.S. government attaches particular importance to support innovative entrepreneurship. State support of the small business innovation is carried through two channels: financing of small businesses in general, and financing of small and medium-sized innovative enterprises.
In 1981, the Small Business Innovation Research Act was passed, which will have an influence on the innovation processes in the country by providing small business grants (subsidies) for innovation. Thus, all government ministries and departments were able to allocate part of its own funds to support small business innovation. However, an important condition for the granting of subsidies is the lack of a bank or venture capital financing innovation in enterprises.
Furthermore, SBA coordinates various programs of financial support for small businesses, such as: Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (SBTT).
SBIR program provides financing of small business engaged in developing of new products and technologies on a competitive basis. In 2010, the Research Foundation, funds from which are used for contracts and grants exceeded $ 1 billion. Subsidies were provided more than half of firms with fewer than 25 employees and a third firms received grants with less than 10 employees.
There are two stages of financing within the framework of the program:
The starting phase (issued up to 150,000 dollars for the technological background of the project with an execution period of about 6 months)
The second stage (issued up to 1 million dollars for the creation of a prototype technology for over 2 years, and the developers estimate the potential commercialization of this development). SBTT program provides financial assistance to small businesses that are supported by non-profit research organizations and development. Moreover scientific organization should contribute at least 30% in research and enterprise - 40%. Thus in 2010, the Fund of SBTT program amounted to more than 100 million dollars. Example of this successful interaction between government and business is the creation of innovative enterprises in 1994 with the assistance of Columbia University. This company carries out the patenting of inventions created in the university, as well as the creation of new businesses based on new technologies developed at the university, etc. As we can see from Table 1 in the period of 2002 to 2012 the number of applicants for a grant programs ranged between 4,300 and 6,000 applicants. At the same time, the number of issued grants decreased every year, only in 2012 showed a slight increase. Thus, the success rate, which is equal to the percentage of applications received grants to all scanned applications from year to year, is dropped, reaching 18.7% in 2012, which is less than 30% compared with 2003.
Table 1 - Statistics on Innovation Program of small businesses and small business technology transfer of 2003-2012
Year |
Amount of applicants |
Amount of winners |
The success rate |
The total value of investment |
|
2003 |
5551 |
1488 |
26,8% |
$327 651 122 |
|
2004 |
6798 |
1596 |
23,5% |
$369 778 690 |
|
2005 |
6139 |
1307 |
21,3% |
$329 290 432 |
|
2006 |
5493 |
1269 |
23,1% |
$351 560 384 |
|
2007 |
4663 |
1142 |
24,5% |
$304 546 579 |
|
2008 |
4356 |
1242 |
28,5% |
$341 059 957 |
|
2009 |
4529 |
1108 |
24,5% |
$339 594 601 |
|
2010 |
6 338 |
1 079 |
17,0% |
$334 370 963 |
|
2011 |
6 415 |
902 |
14,1% |
$311 127 665 |
|
2012 |
5 847 |
1 095 |
18,7% |
$366 812 604 |
Source: NIH Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Grants, Fiscal Years 2003-2012.
Tax incentives are another important mechanism of state support for small businesses. So, in 2012there was applied the following taxation scale:
the first $ 50,000 of income - 15%;
subsequent income from 50,000 to $ 75,000 - 25%;
amount of income from 75,000 to $ 100,000 - 34%;
amount of income from 100,000 to 335,000 dollars - 39%;
amount of income from 335,000 to 10 million dollars - 34%;
amount of income from 10000000 to 15000000 dollars - 35%;
amount from 15000000 to 18000000 dollars - 38%;
amount over 18000000 dollars - 35%.
In many developed countries government sets lower corporate tax rate for small business, however depending on the country the difference in tax rates varied considerably. For example, in the United States the difference between the higher and lower corporate tax rate is 20%, while in France this difference is only 3% in the UK - from 10% to 20%.
Moreover in order to a reduced corporate tax rate in the state and to stimulate the development of small business in the country small companies can use the "bonus the first year", which allows companies to pay tax only half of the taxable amount. In addition legislation provides a variety of additional deductions of taxable base such as expenses for charity, taxes paid by the state government, the cost of health insurance (if their size does not exceed 15% of the taxable amount), interest on personal and mortgage debt.
The current U.S. President Barack Obama during its term reduced the tax burden on small business a lot of time, bringing revenue grew small businesses and investing in them. Regarding the legislative changes, in order to recover the post-crisis economy in 2010 were passed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, Hire Act of 2010, Affordable Care Act of 2010, etc.
Thus, due to the hire act small businesses are exempted from paying their share of payments to social insurance for employees Also this act provides business owners by the tax credit for each newly hired employee. Recovery Act of the economy provided new small businesses a temporary tax exemption during the recovery from the global financial crisis.
Thus, the reduction of taxes on small business enterprises allowed to recover from the global financial crisis, and was the incentive for the creation of new small businesses. As a result, the small business in the country became stronger, which influenced the increase in jobs in the U.S.
Regarding the entrepreneurial potential in the U.S., in 2009, The Gallup Organization conducted a study aimed at identifying the main reasons for selecting or not selecting individual entrepreneurial activity, includes 36 countries. According to the survey, the following conclusions are:
In the U.S. the majority of respondents said that they prefer to conduct their business (55%), while others wished to work under the direction of the employer (36%);
The main reasons that Americans would prefer to work for an employer are stable employment and a regular, fixed income. Working in their own company also has some reasons, because it provides primarily personal independence and gives the opportunity to fulfill personals' potential, as well as the freedom to choose the place and time of work.
Americans believe that entrepreneurs create new jobs, new products and services that benefit the whole of society.
Thus, in general in American society has developed a favorable attitude to individual entrepreneurs.
Among the main fears associated with the base of the business, in the United States may be noted the unpredictability of income level, the possibility of bankruptcy.
In the U.S. more than 50% of respondents believe that the risk of failure should not stop the entrepreneur in creating a new company.
...Подобные документы
Analysis of the status and role of small business in the economy of China in the global financial crisis. The definition of the legal regulations on its establishment. Description of the policy of the state to reduce their reliance on the banking sector.
реферат [17,5 K], добавлен 17.05.2016Directions of activity of enterprise. The organizational structure of the management. Valuation of fixed and current assets. Analysis of the structure of costs and business income. Proposals to improve the financial and economic situation of the company.
курсовая работа [1,3 M], добавлен 29.10.2014A variety of economy of Kazakhstan, introduction of the international technical, financial, business standards, the introduction to the WTO. The measures planned in the new Tax code. Corporation surtax. Surtax reform. Economic growth and development.
реферат [27,2 K], добавлен 26.02.2012The air transport system in Russia. Project on the development of regional air traffic. Data collection. Creation of the database. Designing a data warehouse. Mathematical Model description. Data analysis and forecasting. Applying mathematical tools.
реферат [316,2 K], добавлен 20.03.2016Prospects for reformation of economic and legal mechanisms of subsoil use in Ukraine. Application of cyclically oriented forecasting: modern approaches to business management. Preconditions and perspectives of Ukrainian energy market development.
статья [770,0 K], добавлен 26.05.2015Establishing a favorable environment for investments, removing administrative barriers. Establishing high-technology parks. Formation of financial mechanisms to attract and support investments, tax stimulation measures. Brand promotion of Russian regions.
реферат [15,9 K], добавлен 04.06.2013Short and long run macroeconomic model. Saving and Investment in Italy, small open economy. Government expenditure and saving scatterplot. Loanable market equilibrium in closed economy in the USA. Okun’s Law in the USA and Italy, keynesian cross.
курсовая работа [1,6 M], добавлен 20.11.2013Концепции облачных технологий как удаленного вычислительного центра, к которому предоставляется доступ на основе оплаты Pay-As-You-Go. Рассмотрение облачных технологий применительно к "Business-to-business" модели. Экономический взгляд на "облака".
реферат [30,7 K], добавлен 10.12.2014Basic rules of social protection in USA. Maintenance of legal basis, development and regular updating of general(common) methodological principles of state guarantees and methodical development in sphere of work. Features of payment of work by worker.
курсовая работа [29,4 K], добавлен 12.04.2012Concept and program of transitive economy, foreign experience of transition. Strategic reference points of long-term economic development. Direction of the transition to an innovative community-oriented type of development. Features of transitive economy.
курсовая работа [29,4 K], добавлен 09.06.2012General characteristic of the LLC DTEK Zuevskaya TPP and its main function. The history of appearance and development of the company. Characteristics of the organizational management structure. Analysis of financial and economic performance indicators.
отчет по практике [4,2 M], добавлен 22.05.2015The influence of corruption on Ukrainian economy. Negative effects of corruption. The common trends and consequences of increasing corruption. Crimes of organized groups and criminal organizations. Statistical data of crime in some regions of Ukraine.
статья [26,7 K], добавлен 04.01.2014Antitrust regulation of monopolies. The formation and methods of antitrust policy in Russia. Several key areas of antitrust policy: stimulating entrepreneurship, the development of competition began, organizational and legal support for antitrust policy.
эссе [39,2 K], добавлен 04.06.2012Entrepreneurial risk: the origins and essence. The classification of business risk. Economic characteristic of entrepreneurial risks an example of joint-stock company "Kazakhtelecom". The basic ways of the risks reduction. Methods for reducing the risks.
курсовая работа [374,8 K], добавлен 07.05.2013Solving the problem of non-stationary time series. Estimating nominal exchange rate volatility ruble/dollar by using autoregressive model with distributed lags. Constructing regressions. Determination of causality between aggregate export and volatility.
курсовая работа [517,2 K], добавлен 03.09.2016Socio-economic and geographical description of the United states of America. Analysis of volumes of export and import of the USA. Development and state of agroindustrial complex, industry and sphere of services as basic sectors of economy of the USA.
курсовая работа [264,5 K], добавлен 06.06.2014The stock market and economic growth: theoretical and analytical questions. Analysis of the mechanism of the financial market on the efficient allocation of resources in the economy and to define the specific role of stock market prices in the process.
дипломная работа [5,3 M], добавлен 07.07.2013Government’s export promotion policy. Georgian export promotion agency. Foreign investment promotion. Government’s foreign investment promotion policy. Foreign investment advisory council. Taxation system and tax rates in Georgia.
курсовая работа [644,0 K], добавлен 24.08.2005The global financial and economic crisis. Monetary and financial policy, undertaken UK during a crisis. Combination of aggressive expansionist monetary policy and decretive financial stimulus. Bank repeated capitalization. Support of domestic consumption.
реферат [108,9 K], добавлен 29.06.2011Concept of competitiveness and competition, models. Russia’s endowment. Engendered structural dominance and performance. The state of Russian competitiveness according to the Global Competitiveness Index. Place in the world, main growth in detail.
курсовая работа [1,2 M], добавлен 28.05.2014