Процесуальні перешкоди у справах щодо оскарження рішень, дій, бездіяльності Національного агентства з питань запобігання корупції

Аналіз процесуальних перешкод, зокрема зловживання процесуальними правами, під час розгляду справ щодо оскарження рішень, дій, бездіяльності НАЗК. Аналіз зловживань процесуальними правами під час розгляду справи адміністративним судом першої інстанції.

Рубрика Государство и право
Вид статья
Язык украинский
Дата добавления 07.02.2024
Размер файла 40,1 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

[5] Marchenko, O., Pysarenko, N., & Balakarieva, I. (2022). An Examination of the Administrative Courts of Ukraine in the Context of Understanding the Concept of "a Court Established by Law". Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(14), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-a000218.

[6] Smokovich, M.I., & Bevzenko, V.M. (2021) Administrative process of Ukraine: theory and practice. Kyiv: VD "Dakor".

[7] Gnap, D.D. (2019). Appeal to the court in the order of administrative proceedings. PhD Thesis. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs.

[8] Ivanov, O.V. (2019). Administrative and legal status of the National Agency for the Prevention and Counteraction of Corruption. PhD Thesis. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs.

[9] Polishchuk, V.Yu. (2021). Abuse of procedural rights in administrative proceedings. PhD thesis. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia National University.

[10] Reznikova, V.V. (2013) Abuse of procedural rights in economic proceedings: concept, signs, types. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 95, 31-37.

[11] Beraldo, M.C.S. (2010). The behavior of procedural subjects as an obstacle to the reasonable duration of the process. Faculty of Law of the University of Sra Paulo. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/77265281/The_behavior_of_procedural_ subjects_as_obstacle_to_reasonable_duration_of_the_process.

[12] Branson, J.D. (2021). The Abuse of Process Doctrine Extended: A Tool for Right Thinking People in International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2, 187-214. Retrieved from https://www.squirepattonboggs.com/-/media/files/insights/ publications/2021/03/the-abuse-of-process-doctrine-extended-a-tool-for-right- thinking-people-in-international-arbitration/theabuseofprocessdoctrineextendedatoolf orrightthinkingpeopleininternationalarbitration.pdf.

[13] Damiens, A. (2015). Procedure in private international law: research in European Union law. Right. France: University of Orleans.

[14] Gajda - Roszczynialska, K. (2019). Abuse of procedural rights in Polish and European civil procedure law and the notion of private and public interest. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2, 53-85. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-a000013.

[15] Jacquet, M. (2021). The penalty for the abuse of the right to sue in civil and administrative proceedings. Paris.

[16] Moschel, M. (2022). Jura Novit Curia and the European Court of Human Rights European Journal of International Law, 33, 631-650. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/ chac030.

[17] Parchomiuk, J. (2015). Abuse of Procedural Rights in Administrative Law. In Collection of Papers from the International Academic Conference Bratislava Legal Forum. (pp. 683696). Bratislava: PraF UK.

[18] Law of Ukraine No. 1700-VII "On prevention of corruption". (October 14, 2014). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 49, art. 2056.

[19] Court ruling of the Supreme Court No. 826/13000/18. (July 25, 2019). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83331117.

[20] Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 5-р/2019. (June 13, 2019). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-19/print.

[21] Court ruling of the Supreme Court No. 826/16495/17 (April 10, 2019). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81148437.

[22] Law of Ukraine No. 3166-VI "On central bodies of executive power". (March 17, 2011). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 38. art. 385.

[23] Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (2006). Official Gazette of Ukraine, 32, art. 2371.

[24] Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case "Peretyaka and Sheremetyev v. Ukraine". (December 21, 2010). (2011). (application No. 17160/06 and No. 35548/06). Official Gazette of Ukraine, 3, art. 2528.

[25] Court Decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv No. 640/12946/20. (April 1, 2021). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/96337102.

[26] Court Decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv No. 640/24704/19. (January 28, 2021). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94509266.

[27] Court Decision of the District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv No. 640/12568/19. (May 19, 2021). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/9704039.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.