Creation of a marketing department and it’s development on the example of Kerama Marazzi company

Development of recommendations on the creation and development of a marketing department for Kerama-Sochi LLC. Methodology for conducting SWOT-, PESTEL-analysis and expert assessment. Analysis of the main financial indicators of the branch in Sochi.

Рубрика Менеджмент и трудовые отношения
Вид дипломная работа
Язык английский
Дата добавления 14.07.2020
Размер файла 1,9 M

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

2.5 Financial analysis of Kerama-Sochi LLC

In this part of the thesis, will be analyzed the financial position and performance of Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013 to 2018. The financial analysis is based on the financial statements of the business entity and is a forecast and assessment of the financial condition (Bakanov, Melnik, Sheremet, 2010). The purpose of this analysis is two points. First, comprehension how stable the Sochi branch is. Secondly, the results of the financial condition will help to understand whether the organization will be able to allocate money for the implementation of the project, according to which this study is written, that is, to open a marketing department and its further development. The provided reporting will be in the appendix. During the description of the analysis, tables will be compiled with indicators that are in the financial statements of the Sochi branch.

Structure of the Assets and Liabilities

This table shows assets and liabilities from 2013 to 2018. Below, the author will analyze the indicators that are presented in the table.

Table 4. Structure of assets and liabilities of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

Indicator

Value

Change for the analyzed period

in thousand rubles

% of the balance total

thousand roubles. (c.7-c. 2)

% (c.7-c. 2)

31.12.2013

31.12.2014

31.12.2015

31.12.2016

31.12.2017

31.12.2018

at the beginning of the analyzed period (31.12.2013)

at the end of the analyzed period (31.12.2018)

Assets

1. Non-current assets

3 979

7 658

8 227

6 798

5 705

7 550

4,2

7,8

+3 571

+89,7

Property, plant and equipment

3 806

4 640

4 086

4 103

3 882

6 447

4

6,7

+2 641

+69,4

Intangible assets

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2. Current assets total

91 088

59 653

48 346

55 778

73 537

88 756

95,8

92,2

-2 332

-2,6

Inventories

68 362

44 952

33 498

46 833

56 755

70 288

71,9

73

+1 926

+2,8

Trade and other receivables

19 365

13 915

14 689

8 302

13 447

18 063

20,4

18,8

-1 302

-6,7

Cash and short-term investments

2 223

767

152

595

3 311

323

2,3

0,3

-1 900

-85,5

Equity and Liabilities

1. Equity

15 376

3 000

-2 034

3 441

10 140

22 718

16,2

23,6

+7 342

+47,7

2. Non-current liabilities total

164

112

69

84

101

191

0,2

0,2

+27

+16,5

Borrowed funds

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3. Total Current Liabilities

79 527

64 199

58 538

59 051

69 001

73 397

83,7

76,2

-6 130

-7,7

Borrowed funds

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total balance

95 067

67 311

56 573

62 576

79 242

96 306

100

100

+1 239

+1,3

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018.

This table contains data without deferred income arising in connection with the gratuitous receipt of property and state aid included in equity.

The structure of the organization's assets as of December 31, 2018 is characterized by a large share (92,2%) of current assets and a small percentage of non-current assets. The assets of the organization for the analyzed period (from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2018) remained almost at the same level. Moreover, the size of the organization's assets remained virtually unchanged, but it needs to pay attention to account that equity capital increased even more - by 47,7%. The outstripping increase in equity relative to the total change in assets is a positive factor (Milutina, 2017).

Figure 4. Pie Chart of the ratio of the main groups of assets of the organization*

*Based on the source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018

The growth of the organization's assets is associated with the growth of the following asset positions of the balance sheet. In parentheses, the percentage of change in the total amount of all positively changed indicators will be indicated:

- property, plant and equipment - 2 641 thousand rubles (46.6%)

- Inventories - 1 926 thousand rubles. (34%)

- deferred tax assets - 1 103 thousand rubles. (19,4%).

Among the negatively changed balance sheet items, cash and short-term investments in the asset (-1 900 thousand rubles) and payables in liabilities (-5 777 thousand rubles) can be distinguished. Accounts payable (line 1520 in the accounting report) was considered: indicator for 2018 to subtract the indicator for 2013 (71 220 thousand rubles - 76 997 thousand rubles equals - 5 777 thousand rubles). The decrease in cash and short-term investments is due to the cessation of investment in such quantities of any short-term projects. Moreover, there is an increase in the article of long-term financial investments by 17%. For 5 years, the organization's equity has grown from 15 376 thousand rubles to 22 718 thousand rubles (+7 342 thousand rubles). These indicators indicate that the company redirected its investment activities and began to invest in the long term.

Net Assets Analysis

Table 5. Net assets analysis of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

Indicator

Value

Change for the analyzed period

in thousand rubles

% of the balance total

thousand roubles (c.7-c. 2)

% (c.7-c. 2)

31.12.2013

31.12.2014

31.12.2015

31.12.2016

31.12.2017

31.12.2018

at the beginning of the analyzed period (31.12.2013)

at the end of the analyzed period (31.12.2018)

1. Net assets

15 376

3 000

-2 034

3 441

10 140

22 718

16,2

23,6

+7 342

+47,7

2. Authorized capital

3 000

3 000

3 000

3 000

3 000

3 000

3,2

3,1

-

-

3. The excess of Net assets over Authorized capital

12 376

0

-5 034

441

7 140

19 718

13

20,5

+7 342

+59,3

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018.

The net assets of the Sochi branch as of December 31, 2018 are much (7,6 times) higher than the authorized capital. This means that in the course of its activities, the Kerama-Sochi LLC not only retained the funds originally contributed by the owner, but also ensured their growth. This indicator makes it clear that the financial condition at this ratio is stable. Moreover, the indicator of net assets increased (by 47.7%), if look at the end of 2018 and compare it with 2013. The authorized capital has retained its indicator throughout the analyzed years. For convenience, the dynamics of net assets will be presented below (figure 5).

Figure 5. Bar chart of dynamics net assets and authorized capital of the Kerama-Sochi LLC*

*Based on the source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018

Analysis of financial stability of Kerama-Sochi LLC

In this part, the crucial indicators of the financial stability of the firm will be considered and analyzed. For convenience, the results of the coefficients will be listed in the tables.

The total debt to equity translates the ratio of equity to the total capital of the company. This ratio shows how independent the organization is from creditors. The leverage ratio shows the profitability of equity through borrowing. The working capital financed by equity to total assets ratio illustrates the amount of equity in the enterprise to finance current activities. Net fixed assets index reflects the security of non-current assets of the enterprise with its own funds, thereby showing the stable financial position of the enterprise or not. Investment turnover ratio shows part of the company's assets, which are financed from own funds and long-term liabilities (Breuer, Frumusanu, Manciu, 2018).

From the results of the calculated coefficients (Table 6), it follows that the autonomy coefficient is 0,24 (December 31, 2018), when the optimal value for this industry is 0,3 or more. That is, the deviation from the normal value is not so significant. Moreover, this coefficient shows growth from 2016 to 2018. If we compare the indicator for 2018 with 2013, it can be seen that the value increased by 0,08. But this indicator for the last year still does not correspond to the normal value, which may indicate that the company is still dependent on borrowed funds and can only finance 24% of assets at the expense of equity from creditors due to lack of equity (Nasution, Putri, Dungga, 2019). According to the results of 2018, the financial leverage ratio is 3,24 with the optimal level = / <1,5. This situation may indicate that the more this indicator exceeds the norm, the stronger the dependence of the company on borrowed funds increases (Brei & Gambacorta, 2014). However, it is worth noting that from 2016 to 2018, this ratio approached the normal indicator by 13.95. Working Capital financed by equity to total assets ratio shows negative indicators from 2014 to 2016. The deterioration of this indicator proves a decrease in equity, and therefore, a decrease in the financial stability of the organization (Howorth & Westhead, 2015). Nevertheless, over the past two years, the value of this coefficient has improved, and in 2018 reached 0,16 and this is already equal to the optimal mark. The Net Fixed Assets Index at the end of the analyzed period compared with 2013 increased by 0,07 and reached 0,33, and this is included in the interval of the optimal value. Therefore, for this indicator, the company is financially stable and solvent (Gombola & Ketz, 1983). But in 2014 and 2016, the index grew and was more than the optimal indicator. Such growth may indicate that the financial condition for this indicator was not stable, and that the sources of equity were less than the value of fixed assets and non-current assets (Gupta & Huefner, 1972). In 2015, this indicator turned out to be negative, which indicates the unstable financial condition of the company, which means non-current assets are largely covered by borrowed funds or additional investments (Gombola & Ketz, 1983). The Investment Turnover Ratio showed growth over 6 years, but at the end of 2018, the indicator did not reach the normal indicator. However, given the growth of the coefficient over the last three analyzed years, the forecast for the growth of this indicator to optimality can be considered positive.

Table 6. Key indicators of financial stability of the Sochi branch*

Indicator

Value

Change for the analyzed period

(c.7-c. 2)

Description of the indicator and its normative value

31.12.2013

31.12.2014

31.12.2015

31.12.2016

31.12.2017

31.12.2018

1. Total Debt to Equity

0,16

0,04

-0,04

0,05

0,13

0,24

+0,08

The ratio of equity to total capital.

Normal value for this industry: = /> 0,3**

2. Leverage Ratio

5,18

21,44

-28,81

17,19

6,81

3,24

-1,94

The ratio of borrowed funds to equity.

Normal value: = / <1,5**

3. Working Capital financed by equity to total assets ratio

0,12

-0,07

-0,18

-0,05

0,06

0,16

+0,04

The ratio of working capital to current assets.

Normal value: = / <0,1**

4. Net Fixed Assets Index

0,26

2,55

-4,04

1,98

0,56

0,33

+0,07

The ratio of the value of non-current assets to the amount of equity of the organization. Normal value for this industry: from 0,1 to 1**

5. Investment Turnover Ratio

0,16

0,05

-0,03

0,06

0,13

0,24

+0,08

The ratio of equity and long-term liabilities to total capital.

Normal value: = /> 0,65**

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018.

** Source: Rosstat. Information about the normal values for each coefficient.

***Source: Robinson T. R., 2009. Formulas for calculating indicators.

Liquidity Analysis of Kerama-Sochi LLC

Liquidity ratios show the level of solvency. The current liquidity ratio illustrates the organization's ability to fulfill current liabilities with all current assets that the company owns. (Glazunov, 2009). Quick ratio characterizes solvency in the near future.The cash ratio shows how much short-term liabilities can be repaid due to the available cash. The larger the size of this indicator, the higher the guarantee of debt repayment. (Robinson & Broihah, 2016).

These coefficients, which were calculated by the formulas, for the period under consideration are presented in the table 7. Over the course of 5 years, a decrease in the current ratio has been replaced by growth. Since 2015, there has been an increase in this ratio. At the end of 2018, the coefficient was 0,96, but this still does not correspond to the normal value. The quick liquidity ratio in 2018 compared with 2013 decreased by 0,03 and amounted to 0,25. This value is much lower than the norm, this may mean that the company has too many current liabilities or insufficient liquid assets to fulfill these obligations (Moyer, McGuigan, Kretlow, 2015). The cash ratio over the entire analyzed period was below the optimal value. Moreover, compared to 2013 in 2018, the coefficient decreased by 0,026.However, if the value of the coefficient is small, then the company will be able to pay, provided that the inflow and outflow of funds in terms of volume and term will work in a balanced manner (Laskina, 2018). The indicators for calculating the coefficients were taken from the financial statements of Kerama-Sochi LLC.

Table 7. Calculation of liquidity ratios*

Liquidity ratios

Value

Change for the analyzed period

(c.7-c. 2)

Description of the indicator and its normative value

31.12.2013

31.12.2014

31.12.2015

31.12.2016

31.12.2017

31.12.2018

1. Current Ratio (working capital ratio)

0,90

0,71

0,57

0,80

0,87

0,96

+0,06

The ratio of current assets to current liabilities.

Normal value for this industry: from 1,5 to 2,5**

2. Quick Ratio (acid-test ratio)

0,28

0,22

0,25

0,15

0,24

0,25

-0,03

The ratio of liquid assets to current liabilities.

Normal value: = /> 1**

3. Cash Ratio

0,03

0,01

0,002

0,001

0,05

0,004

-0,026

The ratio of highly liquid assets to current liabilities.

Normal value: = /> 0.2**

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018.

**Source: Rosstat. Information about the normal values for each coefficient.

***Source: Robinson T. R., 2009. Formulas for calculating indicators.Dynamics in liquidity ratios

Figure 6. Multiple line graph of dynamics in liquidity ratios of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

*Based on the source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018

Analysis of the effectiveness of the Kerama-Sochi LLC

This part shows the profitability ratios that illustrate the effectiveness of the company. Moreover, thanks to their analysis, it is possible to understand what share of the profit in the amount invested and used by the organization is (Geamгnu, 2016).

All profitability ratios increased at the end of 2018 compared to 2014 (Table 8). By 2018, the gross margin has reached the optimum value and equals 6,7%, which is 2,7% more than the minimum mark of the normal value. The profit margin has already reached normal values since 2016 and has only improved over the next two years. Since 2016, the return on sales has also reached the optimal level and has grown in 2017 and in 2018 it is equal to 4.6%. In 2014 and in 2015, the ratios were negative, therefore, the organization was unprofitable.

Table 8. Calculation of profitability ratios*

Profitability ratios

Value,%

Change for the analyzed period

2014

2015

2016 

2017

2018

%, (column 6 - column 2)

1.Gross margin

Normal value for this industry: = /> 4%**

-7,4

0,3

3,1

3,2

6,7

+14,1

2.Profit margin.

Normal value: > 0**

-11

-4,1

3,5

4

5,8

+16,8

3.Return on Sales (ROS) Normal value for this industry: = /> 2%**

-8,8

-3,3

2,8

3,2

4,6

+13,4

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2013-2018.

** Source: Rosstat. Information about the normal values for each coefficient.

***Source: Robinson T. R., 2009. Formulas for calculating indicators.

Figure 7. Multiple line graph of dynamics in profitability ratios of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

*Based on the source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2014-2018

Indicators of ROE and ROA are the main indexes of the profitability of an organization (Blazhevich & Suleymanova, 2015). Both indicators have reached normal values since 2016. At the end of 2018, return on equity reached 79,7%, compared with 2013, the indicator increased by 83,1%. The return on assets indicator showed good growth for the analyzed period, at the end of 2018 it was equal to 18,8%.

Table 9. ROA and ROE profitability ratios of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

Profitability ratios

Value,%

Change for the analyzed period

(column 6 - column 2)

Description of the indicator and its normative value

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Return on equity (ROE)***

-3,4

-0,3

179,4

65,2

79,7

+83,1

The ratio of net profit to the average value of equity. Normal value for this industry: = /> 14%**

Return on assets (ROA)***

-15,3

0,9

9,9

8,3

18,8

+34,1

The ratio of net profit to average asset value. The normal value for this industry: = /> 5%**

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2014-2018.

** Source: Rosstat. Information about the normal values for each coefficient.

***Source: Robinson T. R., 2009. Information about indicators.

The table 10 below summarizes the main financial results of the Sochi branch for the analyzed period (from 2013 to 2018).

At the end of 2018, revenue amounted to 272 202 thousand rubles. Annual revenue has grown rapidly (by 132 040 thousand rubles) from 2013 to 2018, this indicator only increased every year. Gross profit at the end of 2018 amounted to 18 116 thousand rubles. compared with 2017 increased by 3 times. For 5 years there has been a rapid, or rather, 28 446 thousand rubles, growth of this indicator. Analyzing the cost of sales, it should be noted that the organization did not use the opportunity to take into account general business expenses as conditionally constant, including their monthly cost of production. This may explain the absence of the indicator of operational cost for the reporting period in the form of №2. Profit before tax (EBIT) in 2018 compared to 2013 increased by 31 152 thousand rubles and it is equal to 15 779 thousand rubles.

Table 10. Overview of the financial results of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

Indicator

Value,

thousand rubles

Change for the analyzed period

Average Annual, thousand rubles

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

thousand rubles (column 6 - column 2)

%

Revenue

140 162

153 305

197 563

209 687

272 202

+132 040

+94,2

194 584

Cost of sales

150 492

152 796

191 391

203 078

254 086

+103 594

+68,8

190 369

Gross profit (revenue - cost of sales**)

-10 330

509

6 172

6 609

18 116

+28 446

^

4 215

Other income and expenses, except interest payable

-5 043

-6 754

765

1 765

-2 337

+2 706

^

-2 321

EBIT

(profit before interest and taxes**)

-15 373

-6 245

6 937

8 374

15 779

+31 152

^

1 894

Income tax expense (profit before interest and taxes**)

2 997

1 211

-1 462

-1 684

-3 201

-6 198

v

-428

Profit (loss)

-12 376

-5 034

5 475

6 690

12 578

+24 954

^

1 467

*Source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2014-2018.

**Source: Robinson T. R., 2009. Information about indicators.

A clear vision of the dynamics of the development of financial indicators is shown in figure 7.

Figure 7. Multiple line graph of dynamics of financial results of Kerama-Sochi LLC*

*Based on the source: accounting reports of the Kerama-Sochi LLC for the period from 2014-2018

2.6 Conclusion of financial analysis

Summing up the financial analysis for the period from 2013 to 2018, there are indicators that satisfy the normal values ??are:

- net assets exceed the authorized capital, in addition, they increased over the 5 analyzed years;

- the security ratio with own working capital at the end of 2018 is 0,16, which corresponds to the optimal value;

- profitability analysis showed an increase in all three calculated indicators, at the end of 2018, ALL had reached normal values;

- the dynamics of equity relative to the total change in the assets of the organization is positive;

- revenue growth over the entire analyzed period, compared with 2014, this indicator over 5 years increased by 132 040 thousand rubles, which in 2018 is 272 202 thousand rubles;

- growth in profit from sales, despite a negative indicator in 2014 (-10 330 thousand rubles), since 2015 there has been a growth in profit, and in 2018 it is 18 116 thousand rubles, which is 28 446 thousand more than in 2014;

- growth in profit before interest payable and taxation (EBIT) per ruble of revenue, where in 2018 it is 15 779 thousand rubles.

Throughout the analysis, the most negative or non-normal indicators were obtained in 2014 and 2015. In addition to the internal mechanisms carried out by Kerama-Sochi LLC during the analyzed period, another trend may be played by the instability of the ruble exchange rate throughout the country during these years (this information is taken from accounts of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation).

2.7 Quantitative part: survey

A survey is a structured questionnaire that is provided to a sample of the population and is designed to receive specific information from respondents (Malhotra, 2012).

This questionnaire will be conducted to assess the structure of marketing departments, the effectiveness of marketing tools for development. The population of this analysis are various companies that have their own marketing department. Accordingly, the sampling unit is the manager of the marketing department. To a greater extent, the focus will be on companies whose activities are related to the construction industry, production, and sale of ceramic products. The sample will consist of 40 managers from the marketing department, one person from the company. Consequently, this survey includes 40 organizations. All questions in this survey are provided in a closed form. Questions for the questionnaire are compiled based on the analysis of several questionnaires, which were based on marketing research. Moreover, questions concerning specialties that can function in marketing services were taken from the already analyzed literature. This survey will be generated using the Google form. This format was chosen because it makes it possible to quickly receive respondents' answers in an already processed format. The type of interviewing method is electronic mail survey. The questions for the questionnaire were compiled on the basis of the analyzed literature and examples of surveys with a similar topic.

The structure of the questionnaire includes 5 blocks with questions, where several main measurement scales are included: nominal, ordinal and interval scale. The first block includes questions for identifying the correspondent (age, gender, experience in the marketing sphere). The second block of questions is aimed at obtaining information about the organization in which the manager works. The second block of questions is aimed at obtaining information about the organization in which the manager works, and about the structure of the marketing department. The third block of questions is related to the definition of effective communication channels for product development. The fourth block is devoted to understanding which social networks are used to promote the products of companies. The fifth block includes questions about the possibility of events that are organized to expand the customer base, for existing partners, for regular customers. The sampling technique for this survey is - quota sampling, because the selection of respondents consisted of 2 stages. Firstly, companies that work in the construction industry were selected. Secondly, letters were written to selected 70 organizations with a question about the presence of a marketing department, because managers of marketing departments were required to pass the questionnaire. Of the 70 organizations, only 40 had a marketing department. It should be noted that it was not possible to interview only construction companies because of the failure to receive a response from many organizations. Therefore, companies from other areas were taken. The questionnaire layout is attached in the Appendix.

MS Excel will be used to analyze the data, because it is convenient for structuring an array of information, as well as for providing information in different visual forms.

Results of the questionnaire

According to the results of the survey, 40 managers of marketing departments agreed to take the questionnaire.

Among the organizations whose managers passed the survey (figure 8), the largest number were small businesses (41%). This result is very useful for this project, because Kerama-Sochi LLC is also a small enterprise. Moreover, according to the questionnaire, 34 marketing managers work for organizations that are Russian.

Figure 8. Pie chart showing sizes of surveyed organizations*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

According to the data obtained after the survey, 31 companies working in the construction sector and 9 companies from the transport industry participated in the questionnaire. Below is a graph with the results for better visualization and understanding (figure 9). Thus, it turned out that you can get a more complete picture of how the marketing departments in construction companies conduct their activities, which is important for the results of this study.

Figure 9. Bar graph showing areas of companies surveyed*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

Among the managers of marketing departments who work in small enterprises (according to the results of a survey of firms that are small businesses - 17), the question "How many specialists are included in your marketing department?" the most popular was the answer, where the range of specialists was from 1 to 3 (figure 10). Nevertheless, the most popular answer was 5 specialists, but among the respondents there were mainly managers from large enterprises, which is less relevant for our study.

Figure 10. Bar graph describing the number of specialists of a marketing department in small enterprises*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

Analysis of the answers to the question “What kind of specialists work in your department?” showed the following result (in this question, several options could be chosen):

- public relations officer (31 respondents), it was the most popular answer;

- manager of the marketing department (30 respondents);

- marketing analyst (24 respondents);

- SMM specialist (20 respondents);

- marketing coordinator (13);

- marketing assistant (9).

Moreover, there was an answer in the line “other”, where the respondent indicated that the director of the marketing department is also an analyst (figure 11).

Figure 11. Bar graph describing the number of specialists in marketing departments of organizations*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

The following question was formulated in order to understand what, in the opinion of experts in the marketing field, specialties are most needed by the marketing service. If compare figure 11 and figure 12, it is clear that the leading positions are still occupied by specialties: marketing analyst, public relations manager and marketing department manager.

Figure 12. Bar graph describing the necessary marketing specialists according to the respondents themselves*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

Based on the results of the following question: “In your opinion, is it necessary to create a marketing department in the company's branches (if the needs of the clients of the branches differ due to their location in another region)?”, the most popular answer was “yes” (33 out of 40 respondents answered positively).

To the question "Does your marketing department hold meetings to discuss current issues?" the most popular answer was - yes, meetings take place if necessary (16 managers). The second popular answer was - yes, meetings take place every week (13 managers), the third - yes, every month (8 managers), the fourth - no, meetings are not held (2 managers), and the fifth - yes, every day (1 manager). For a better understanding of the ratio of the answers received below is the pie chart (figure 13).

Figure 13. Pie chart showing the frequency of meetings in the marketing departments*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

Among the respondents to the question “Has your company's profit increased or decreased over the year after the creation of the marketing department and its activities?”, the most popular answer was “profit increased” (34 out of 40 respondents). Moreover, to the question “If the profit of the organization has increased, then by how much” the most popular answer was “doubled”. To the question “If the profit of the organization has decreased, then by how much” the most frequently chosen answer was “profit remained at the same level”.

The answers received by the managers of the marketing departments helped to understand through which communication channels customers can most often learn about the products or services that organizations provide (figure 14). In this question, among the respondents, the "company official website" (34 from 40) was the most chosen answer.

Figure 14. Bar graph showing the popularity of using communication channels with customers*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

The survey results showed that the presence of an official website is in demand among buyers (26 out of 40 respondents, where 4 out of 40 organizations do not have a website at all). Moreover, the results illustrate that 28 organizations have the “online purchase” function, which is carried out through the company's website.

The respondents in the questionnaire had to answer a series of questions about such a popular social network as Instagram. Among the results, there are several interesting points. 27 managers replied that their organization has a profile in this application for product promotion. Therefore, this tool is popular as a means of promoting the product. Moreover, 31 respondents said that the marketing department is developing and promoting the profile of the organization in Instagram.

To the question "What tools does your marketing department use to promote products / services using Instagram?", answers were as follows (figure 15):

- publication of posts (26 respondents);

- publication of stories (21 respondents);

- customer consultation on emerging issues (17 respondents);

- periodic holding of various headings (13 respondents);

- acceptance of orders (12 respondents);

- holding contests and sweepstakes (9 respondents);

- live broadcasts (7 respondents).

Figure 15. Bar graph showing the popularity of Instagram promotion tools*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

On the one hand, to the question “Does your marketing department attract bloggers to advertise a product / service using social networks”, 75% of respondents answered “no.” On the other hand, to the question "In your opinion, is advertising of a product / service using a blogger effective or not?" 73,5% of respondents chose “yes, effectively”. It can be concluded that this type of promotion has potential, but it is not yet so common among construction companies.

The most popular social networks from the question “In your opinion, which social networks are suitable for advertising a product / service?” were (figure 16): Instagram (34 managers), Telegram channel (15) and Facebook (12). Therefore, these directions can be taken in attention to product promotion.

Figure 16. Bar graph showing the most popular social networks for product promotion*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

The marketing department took the habit of holding events that are created to expand the customer base, for existing partners, for regular customers. The frequency of such events varies among respondents:

- yes, events are held as necessary (16 respondents);

- yes, events are held every month (9 respondents);

- no, events are not held (6 respondents);

- yes, events are held every year (5 respondents);

- yes, events are held every week (3 respondents);

- yes, events are held once every half a year (1 respondents).

It is interesting that those respondents who replied that they didn't carry out events are all employees of microenterprises. The graph will provide all the answers to this question (figure 17).

Figure 17. Bar graph showing the frequency of events by marketing departments*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

The graph shows that there is a need for such formats among companies. Therefore, if Kerama-Sochi LLC this format will meet the branch's marketing strategy, then it can be included in the responsibilities of the marketing department.

Further, in the questionnaire, event formats were selected by popularity to attract consumers: participation in exhibitions (20), presentations (19), entertaining events (15), contests and quizzes in the organization (10), sampling- free distribution of product samples traded by firms (6), flash mobs (3), webinars (2). For clarity, below is a graph (figure 18).

Figure 18. Pie chart showing the types of events held by marketing departments*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

To the question "Your marketing department is looking for partners, when is going to hold any event?" the most popular answer was yes (23). Only 9 people chose “by necessity,” and 2 said “no”. The results make it clear that finding partners for the event is a normal and useful practice (figure 19).

Figure 19. Bar graph describing whether the interviewed organizations attract partners for events*

*Based on the source: according to the results of the responses after the survey

2.8 Qualitative part: in-depth interviews

Sample and data collection

This format of qualitative analysis is carried out to grasp the structure of the marketing departments of the branches and their interaction with the head office. Moreover, the chosen analysis method will help to find out the insights of work processes and possible development tools used by marketing services. In-depth interviews were selected due to a lack of necessary information in open sources. In addition, the information obtained during all interviews will be useful, because these branches are part of Kerama Marazzi LLC, like the Sochi branch, they all work in the construction industry and have the necessary experience in the marketing field, which will be useful in developing recommendations to create a marketing service for Kerama-Sochi LLC.

Respondents were chosen for in-depth interviews using the snowball method. This format was chosen because of the difficulty in finding the right specialist in this field, since little information is available in open sources. According to this method of selecting respondents, several suitable specialists are initially selected, who will then share the contacts of their colleagues (Naderifar, Goli, Ghaljaie, 2017). The initially selected respondent is the general director of Kerama-Sochi LLC - Bukhareva Nina Alexandrovna.Then the respondent contacted the director of the marketing department of the head office - Yegorova Elena Vyacheslavovna. After the interview, this specialist gave contacts to 10 potential respondents, of which only 8 people agreed to conduct the interview.

The initially selected respondent is the general director of Kerama-Sochi LLC - Bukhareva Nina Alexandrovna. Then the respondent contacted the director of the marketing department of the head office - Yegorova Elena Vyacheslavovna. After the interview, this specialist gave contacts to 10 potential respondents, of which only 8 people agreed to conduct the interview.

Respondents who agreed to the interview:

- Siberian Alexander Gennadievich. General Director of Kerama-Volgograd LLC. He has been in this position for 15 years.

- Director of the marketing department of Kerama-SPB LLC. This respondent asked for privacy. She has been in this position for 6 years.

- Karsakov Maxim Konstantinovich. General Director of KERAMA-Golden Ring LLC. He has been in this position for 4 years.

- Berdnikov Igor Petrovich. General Director of Ufa-Kerama LLC. He has been in this position for 13 years.

- Director of the marketing department of Kerama-Crimea LLC. This respondent asked for privacy. He has been in this position for 4 years.

- Kochergin Valery Nikolaevich. General Director of Orelshtamp LLC. He has been in this position for 13 years.

- Victor Dudinets. General Director of VOLGA-KERAMA LLC. He has been in this position for 10 years.

- Krivorotov Dmitry Nikolaevich. General director of Sibir-Kerama LLC. He has been in this position for 4 years.

All interviews are a semi-structured type from existing ones. This means that all respondents answer open questions, there is a detailed discussion of a specific topic. Questions for the interview were created in advance, based on the analyzed literature and on the basis of those tasks that should be solved for this project. All layouts of prepared questions for respondents are presented in the Appendix. The way of communication with respondents was carried out through the WhatsApp program. This format was a forced format because of the coronavirus and because all respondents are in different cities of Russia. This program was chosen for the interview, because it was convenient for all specialists. Venues for interviews were at home. All interviews were recorded using audio recordings for further transcription with the permission of the respondents.

Data analyses

The most important goal of conducting these interviews with respondents from different branches of the Kerama Marazzi company was to obtain answers to the question of the interaction of the marketing departments of the head office and the branches. And the necessary information was acquired during the interviews. Firstly, all 8 departments of the surveyed branches have a linear organization structure for the marketing department. Respondents (5 out of 8 specialists) noted that this structure works most effectively based on their work experience. Secondly, the reasons were identified that contributed to the fact that the branch needs its own marketing department. The most popular responses among respondents were the following reasons:

- the difference in the preferences of customers of each branch and their reaction to product advertising (specifics of the regions);

- lack of time to monitor and regulate all processes of the branch, because the genius director of the organization is forced to take on the implementation of marketing tasks;

- due to the fact that the activities of branches tend to become wider and more powerful with time, it becomes more and more difficult to control each department;

- increase the competitiveness of the branch.

To determine the functions of the future marketing department of Kerama-Sochi LLC, respondents from eight branches and the manager of the head department were asked about the interaction of the departments among themselves, which functions are carried out at the local level, and which marketing issues are resolved at the head office level. Respondents were asked questions regarding a number of functions that are performed by the marketing departments (Urbonaviиius, Dikиius, Kasnauskienл, 2017). After analyzing the answers, the results were as follows: the head office of the marketing service develops a basic marketing strategy for the company and for all affiliates that solve marketing problems. Relative to this function, the departments of the branches, when solving marketing problems, must adhere to the set marketing strategy. At the expense of pricing policy and its installation, the head office develops recommended prices for each product, where a prerequisite is not to put below the specified price. However, a branch sets the final price for each product, taking into account the current situation in the market where a branch operates. The head marketing department is fully responsible for the “product development” function. Branches only receive a finished and distributed product for further sale to the final consumer. Product promotion is carried out by both the head department and the marketing departments of the branches, where the main marketing department develops promotion recommendations and a compulsory brand book, which is sent once a year when the new annual collection of Kerama Marazzi LLC is launched. In turn, the departments of the branches are required to comply with the conditions that are prescribed in the brand book, while pursuing its policy of promoting the product, which is effective in the current market of a region. Nevertheless, advertising solutions developed by a branch must be agreed with the head office. Marketing research is carried out by both the head department and marketing services at the branches. The main office is engaged in market research for further decisions, and also analyzes the work of the marketing departments of branches to monitor the effectiveness of these departments. The marketing services of various branches are also responsible for this function, where they analyze the current market situation, the internal activities of the company, develop marketing strategies arising from the final analysis, but all decisions must first be approved by the head office. Regarding SMM functions, the most popular answers among respondents were: the head office develops and creates content for publication on social platforms, and the branches have the right to publish only the prepared material by the head office. Nevertheless, affiliated societies have the right to use the capabilities of tools on social networks, but having previously agreed upon marketing decisions with the main department.

To the question “Does the marketing department of your branch present the new annual collection of Kerama Marazzi LLC?” 9 out of 10 respondents answered positively. Moreover, the question regarding the amount of expenses for holding this event, the most popular answer was about 2 million rubles, where the head office pays half of the costs.

To the question “Does your department use radio stations to advertise products? If the answer is yes, then with what frequency does it work most effectively?” the most popular answer among respondents (9 out of 10) was, yes, they use this type of advertising. At the expense of frequency, the answer “once a month” was often answered. To the question “Does your department use print media for product advertising? If the answer is yes, then with what frequency does it work most effectively?” 8 out of 10 respondents answered positively, regarding the frequency of use, the most popular answer was “twice a year”. To the question “Does your department use website promotion to promote products? If the answer is yes, then with what frequency does it work most effectively?” all respondents answered positively, 7 out of 8 respondents answered that they use this type of advertising twice a month. Moreover, 5 respondents noted that they are using Yandex Direct and Google AdWords to promote the web site of the branch. To the question “Does your department use banners for product advertising? If the answer is yes, then with what frequency does it work most effectively?” 8 out of 8 respondents answered that they are using, and the most popular answer to the next question was “once a month”. However, the general director of Kerama-Sochi LLC noted that this branch already uses this method of advertising and based on experience, the most effective option for the frequency of use of this tool is by season, because the largest flow of people happens in summer and winter, when a huge number of tourists come in town. Moreover, this respondent noted that the Sochi branch uses advertising with banners at the airport in the winter and summer seasons and voiced the costs of this service. CEO of Kerama-Sochi LLC spoke about his wishes regarding what functions he would like for the marketing department to perform:

- analysis of the internal activities of the branch;

- analysis of the market in which the organization operates;

- analysis of competitors and their pricing policies;

- work with social networks

- a specialist who will organize presentations.

In this regard, the results of strategic and financial analysis confirm that the activities of the Sochi branch over the past 5 years are becoming more stable and stable, and the current market conditions and external factors that may affect the development of the Kerama-Sochi LLC create a favorable environment for the implementation of new projects.

In the next part, recommendations on the creation and development of the marketing department at Kerama-Sochi LLC will be signed. Due to all the analysis of the current market and the activities of the branch, the signing plan will be based on the results that were outlined in this part.

3. Project section

This section includes the development of recommendations and measures for the creation and functioning of the marketing department at Kerama-Sochi LLC. The plan to create a marketing service in the Sochi branch can be divided into several stages (Table 11).

Table 11. Stages of the plan to create a marketing department in Kerama-Sochi LLC

Stage

Components

Description

1

Structure of the marketing department

Based on the results of the analysis, the organization structure of the marketing department will be determined

2

Functional part

The functions of the marketing department, the interaction of the marketing service of the head office with the branch, the functions of each specialist will be signed

3

Development of the budget

Forecast the main costs for creating a marketing department

4

Development Suggestions

Recommendations for the development of the marketing department

The reasons why the other branches of Kerama Marazzi decided to create their own marketing department were (found out during in-depth interviews):

- the difference in the preferences of the clients of each branch and their reaction to product advertising (that is, the advertising installations that came from the head office did not fully work on the market, taking into account the specific demand of a particular region)

- the general director of the branch is forced to deal with the marketing tasks coming from the head office. However, due to the heavy workload of the general director for marketing, he does not pay enough attention to solve the strategic and current problems of the company's development

- increase the competitiveness of the branch through the competent use of marketing tools.

In order for the organization's activities to be agile and supple, firms must constantly analyze the internal and external state of an organization, where information is obtained due to economic, political, legal, technical, social factors. (Pankrukhin, 1999). Kerama-Sochi LLC has been operating for 16 years, increasing sales, increasing its regular customer base, revenue (follows from the financial analysis), and expanding the range of products. For this reason, it becomes more difficult to manage all the processes of activity, there is a need for the help of other specialists (from in-depth interviews with respondents). Having discussed all issues with the Moscow office, the Sochi branch decided to im...


Подобные документы

  • Analysis of the peculiarities of the mobile applications market. The specifics of the process of mobile application development. Systematization of the main project management methodologies. Decision of the problems of use of the classical methodologies.

    контрольная работа [1,4 M], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • Organizational structure of the company. Analysis of the external and internal environment. Assessment of the company's competitive strength. Company strategy proposal. Structure of implementation and creation of organizational structure of management.

    дипломная работа [2,7 M], добавлен 19.01.2023

  • The audience understand the necessity of activity planning and the benefits acquired through budgeting. The role of the economic planning department. The main characteristics of the existing system of planning. The master budget, the budgeting process.

    презентация [1,3 M], добавлен 12.01.2012

  • Evaluation of urban public transport system in Indonesia, the possibility of its effective development. Analysis of influence factors by using the Ishikawa Cause and Effect diagram and also the use of Pareto analysis. Using business process reengineering.

    контрольная работа [398,2 K], добавлен 21.04.2014

  • The main reasons for the use of virtual teams. Software development. Areas that are critical to the success of software projects, when they are designed with the use of virtual teams. A relatively small group of people with complementary skills.

    реферат [16,4 K], добавлен 05.12.2012

  • Company’s representative of small business. Development a project management system in the small business, considering its specifics and promoting its development. Specifics of project management. Problems and structure of the enterprises of business.

    реферат [120,6 K], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • History of development the world leader in the production of soft drinks company "Coca-Cola". Success factors of the company, its competitors on the world market, target audience. Description of the ongoing war company the Coca-Cola brand Pepsi.

    контрольная работа [17,0 K], добавлен 27.05.2015

  • Searching for investor and interaction with him. Various problems in the project organization and their solutions: design, page-proof, programming, the choice of the performers. Features of the project and the results of its creation, monetization.

    реферат [22,0 K], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • Проектирование совокупности взаимосвязанных бизнес-процессов предприятия как трудоемкий процесс по их моделированию. Модели прямого и обратного реинжиниринга в рамках стандарта моделирования бизнес-процессов IDEF0 на примере компании Destiny Development.

    курсовая работа [918,5 K], добавлен 22.04.2014

  • Investigation of the subjective approach in optimization of real business process. Software development of subject-oriented business process management systems, their modeling and perfection. Implementing subject approach, analysis of practical results.

    контрольная работа [18,6 K], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • Formation of intercultural business communication, behavior management and communication style in multicultural companies in the internationalization and globalization of business. The study of the branch of the Swedish-Chinese company, based in Shanghai.

    статья [16,2 K], добавлен 20.03.2013

  • Description of the structure of the airline and the structure of its subsystems. Analysis of the main activities of the airline, other goals. Building the “objective tree” of the airline. Description of the environmental features of the transport company.

    курсовая работа [1,2 M], добавлен 03.03.2013

  • Milestones and direction of historical development in Germany, its current status and value in the world. The main rules and principles of business negotiations. Etiquette in management of German companies. The approaches to the formation of management.

    презентация [7,8 M], добавлен 26.05.2015

  • Value and probability weighting function. Tournament games as special settings for a competition between individuals. Model: competitive environment, application of prospect theory. Experiment: design, conducting. Analysis of experiment results.

    курсовая работа [1,9 M], добавлен 20.03.2016

  • Critical literature review. Apparel industry overview: Porter’s Five Forces framework, PESTLE, competitors analysis, key success factors of the industry. Bershka’s business model. Integration-responsiveness framework. Critical evaluation of chosen issue.

    контрольная работа [29,1 K], добавлен 04.10.2014

  • Detection the benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility strategies that would serve as a motivation for managers and shareholders in the context of a classical firm, which possesses monetary preferences. Theoretical framework and hypothesis development.

    курсовая работа [319,5 K], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • Relevance of electronic document flow implementation. Description of selected companies. Pattern of ownership. Sectorial branch. Company size. Resources used. Current document flow. Major advantage of the information system implementation in the work.

    курсовая работа [128,1 K], добавлен 14.02.2016

  • The impact of management and leadership styles on strategic decisions. Creating a leadership strategy that supports organizational direction. Appropriate methods to review current leadership requirements. Plan for the development of future situations.

    курсовая работа [36,2 K], добавлен 20.05.2015

  • Theoretical basis recruitment and selection methods: internal or external recruitment, job resume, job interview. Recruitment process design and development. Evaluation of methods of recruitment and selection on example of "Procter and Gamble".

    курсовая работа [73,2 K], добавлен 03.05.2012

  • Organizational legal form. Full-time workers and out of staff workers. SWOT analyze of the company. Ways of motivation of employees. The planned market share. Discount and advertizing. Potential buyers. Name and logo of the company, the Mission.

    курсовая работа [1,7 M], добавлен 15.06.2013

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.