Образы современности в XXI веке: космодернизм

47. Urry, J. (2018) Kak vyglyadit budushchee? Moscow, Delo Publishing House. 320 p. (In Russ.). Fukuyama, F. (1990) Konetz istorii? Voprosy filosofii, no. 3, pp. 134-148. (In Russ.).

48. Fukuyama, F. (2005) Konetz istorii I poslendiy chelovek. Moscow, Ast Publ. 592 p. (In Russ.). Harvey, D. (2007) Kratkaya istoriya neoliberalizma. Aktual'noe prochtenie. Moscow, Pokolenie. 288 p. (In Russ.).

49. Akker, R. van den (2013) Whatever Works. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 15-30.

50. Akker, R. van den and Vermeulen, T. (2017) Periodising the 2000s, or, the Emergence of Metamodernism. In: Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. R. Van den Akker, A. Gibbons and T. Vermeulen (eds). Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield. 260 p. Pp. 1-20.

51. Appiah, A. K. (2001) Cosmopolitan Reading. In: Cosmopolitan Geographies: New Locations in Literature and Culture. Dharwadker V. (ed.). New York, Routledge. 224 p. Pp. 197-228.

52. Elias, A. J. (2013) Tense and Sensibility. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 7-8.

53. Elias, A. J. (2015) The Commons ... and Digital Planetarity. In: The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century / Elias A. J., Moraru C. (eds.). Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312 p. P. 37-69.

54. Elias, A. J. and Moraru, C. (2015a) Introduction: The Planetary Condition. In: The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Elias A. J. and Moraru C. (eds.). Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312 p. Pp. xxi-xxxvii.

55. Elias, A. J. and Moraru, C. (eds.) (2015b) The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312 p.

56. Eshelman, R. (2013) Performing the Post-Postmodern. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 14-15.

57. Eshelman, R. (2015) Archetypologies of the Human: Planetary Performatism, Cinematic Relationality, and Inarritu's Babel. In: The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Elias A. J. and Moraru C. (eds.). Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312p. Pp. 89-106.

58. Gibbons, A. (2013) Profit over History. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 11.

59. Hutcheon, L. (1988) A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York, Routledge, 1988. 284 p.

60. Kirby, A. (2013) Digimodern Textual Endlessness. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 12.

61. Kirby, A. (2015) The Possibility of Cyber-Placelessness: Digimodernism on a Planetary Platform. In: The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Elias A. J. and Moraru C. (eds.). Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312p. Pp. 71-88.

62. McHale, B. (2015) The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodernism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 256 p.

63. Moraru, C. (2001) Rewriting: Postmodern Narrative and Cultural Critique in the Age of Cloning. Albany, SUNY Press. 248 p.

64. Moraru, C. (2005) Memorious Discourse: Reprise and Representation in Postmodernism. Madison, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. 282 p.

65. Moraru, C. (2011) Cosmodernism: American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the New Cultural Imaginary. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. 440p.

66. Moraru, C. (2013) Introduction to Focus: Thirteen Ways of Passing Postmodernism. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 3-4.

67. Moraru, C. (2015a) Decompressing Culture: Three Steps toward a Geomethodology. In: The Planetary Turn. Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Elias A. J. and Mora- ru C. (eds.). Evanston, Illinois, Northwestern University Press. 312p. P. 211-244.

68. Moraru, C. (2015b) Reading for the Planet: Toward a Geomethodology. Ann Arbor, MI, Michigan University Press. 256 p.

69. Moraru, C. (ed.) (2009) Postcommunism, Postmodernism, and the Global Imagination. New York, Columbia University Press. 200 p.

70. Mraovic-O'Hare, D. (2012) Moraru's Cosmodernism. Postmodern Culture, 2012, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 53-59.

71. Nealon, J. T. (2012) Post-postmodernism, or, The logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford, Stanford University Press. 241 p.

72. Nicolescu, B. (2014) From Modernity to Cosmodernity. Science, Culture and Spirituality. Albany, State University of New York Press. 282 p.

73. Randall, A. (2004) Pushkin and the Queen of Spades. New York, Houghton Mifflin. 294 p.

74. Spivak, G. C. (2003) Death of a Discipline. New York, Columbia University Press. 136 p.

75. Vermeulen, T. (2013) Metamodernist Affect. American Book Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 8-9.

76. Wegner, P. E. (2009) Life between Two Deaths, 1989-2001: U.S. Culture in the Long Nineties. Durham, Duke University Press. 296 p.

IMAGES OF MODERNITY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: COSMODERNISM

N. B. Afanasov, A. V. Pavlov RAS Institute of Philosophy

The article discusses one of the latest attempts to “rewrite” postmodernism, known as «cosmod- ernism”, that was undertaken by American philosopher Christian Moraru. The authors reconstruct the discussion on the necessity to build a new philosophical project to replace Fredric Jameson's postmodernism, on which was based Moraru's philosophical work. The article offers a historical-philosophical reconstruction of the theory of cosmodernism in its relation to the disputes around postpostmodernism at the beginning of the 21st century. Also the paper clarifies the relationship between the concepts of “cosmodernism” and “planetarism”, which are the historical names of one project.

A critical review of the concept of cosmodernism/ planetarism describes the methodology of Moraru that consists mainly of the analysis of literary works from the mid-19th century to the present day, which demonstrate, according to the philosopher, the most representative features ofmoder- nity. The analysis of the theory and its comparison to competing social-philosophical projects, such as digimodernism and metamodernism, reveals the most interesting for the actual social philosophy sides of cosmodernism: an indication of the blurring of subject-object boundaries in modernity, the analysis of the phenomenon of netovisation of spaces and objects, rethinking the nature of the completing globalization, the prospects of the secularization of the discrete world to the cultural concept of the planet. The weak point of Moraru's philosophical work is the concentration exclusively on avant-garde literature, which limits the author's ability to work with the empirical material ofmodernity and weakens the position of his theory in comparison to other projects.

Keywords: cosmodernism; planetarism; Cristian Moraru; postmodernism; post-postmodernism; social philosophy; philosophy of culture

Размещено на Allbest.ru