On some conceptual background of Imre Lakatos' thought
The comments on some problems in William T. Lynch's work on the Marxist roots of Imre Lakatos' history and philosophy of science. This is still debatable issue relating to the adequate interpretations of Imre Lakatos' complete intellectual growth.
Рубрика | Философия |
Вид | статья |
Язык | английский |
Дата добавления | 20.01.2022 |
Размер файла | 17,2 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Размещено на http://allbest.ru
ON SOME CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND OF IMRE LAKATOS' THOUGHT
Svetlana V. Shibarshina - PhD in Philosophy, senior lecturer. National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod.
Nizhni Novgorod, Russian Federation;
This paper comments on some problems accentuated in William T. Lynch's work on the Marxist roots of Imre Lakatos' history and philosophy of science. This is quite a significant and still debatable issue relating to the adequate interpretations of Imre Lakatos' complete intellectual growth. Accordingly, any further exploration of the “deep structures" of his conceptual background may help gain a better understanding of his legacy. In this comment, I make a brief review of the studies on the pre-English roots of Lakatos' theoretical schemes.
Keywords: Imre Lakatos, Marxism, Hungarian heuristics, practice
О НЕКОТОРЫХ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫХ ОСНОВАНИЯХ ИДЕЙ ИМРЕ ЛАКАТОСА
Шибаршина Светлана Викторовна - кандидат философских наук, старший преподаватель. Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Российская Федерация. г. Нижний Новгород
В данном комментарии предпринимается попытка рассмотрения некоторых проблем, затронутых в статье У.Т. Линча о влиянии марксизма на историю и философию науки Имре Лакатоса. Это весьма серьезный и до сих пор дискуссионный вопрос, освещение которого способствовало бы более адекватной интерпретации интеллектуальной биографии Лакатоса. Представляется, что дальнейшие исследования «глубинных структур» его творчества позволят прийти к более объективному пониманию его наследия. В данном комментарии предпринимается краткий обзор работ по проблеме влияния на мировоззрение Лакатоса различных мыслителей и философских направлений.
Ключевые слова: Имре Лакатос, марксизм, венгерская эвристика, практика
William T Lynch's article tackles quite a significant and still debatable issue relating to the adequate interpretations of Imre Lakatos' ideas in view of his complete intellectual growth. As a scholar, Lakatos has had immense influence on the philosophy of science and a visible impact on some other research areas. According to Google Scholar, by the 25th of January 2015, that is, twenty-five days into the new year, thirty-three papers cited him, which is over one paper per day [Musgrave, 2016]. More than half of these publications are from non-philosophical disciplines, such as educational theory, international relations, informatics, clinical psychology, social economics, mathematics, etc.
As is known, Lakatos gained prominence, foremost, as a follower and critic of Karl Popper. In the meantime, scholars have uncovered other philosophical and scientific sources that might have influenced his reasoning. In recent decades the Marxist inheritance of Lakatos' later philosophy of mathematics and science has become the subject of studies by a number of scholars, such as John Kadvany, Gyцrgy Kampis, Lвszlo Ropolyi, etc. [For more details, see Dusek, 2015]. In Russia, this aspect of Lakatos' scholarship is explored to a much lesser extent - mostly by Valentin A. Bazhanov [Bazhanov, 2008; Bazhanov, 2009] - and his evolution in many ways remains somewhere on the periphery of Russian philosophers' attention. In fact, Lakatos' intellectual biography is quite thrilling. It includes two distinctly separate “lives” referred to as the Hungarian and the British periods. He came to the UK with partially formed viewpoints but kept quiet about his former practices in Hungary, and in his writings on the philosophy of science in the mid-1960s disassociated himself from Marxism (Anglo-American philosophy of science, in general, did not maintain any expressed sympathies for communism). Nevertheless, it turns out that in his British works Lakatos frequently concealed the Marx- ist-Hegelian elements of his thought, which, as V. A. Bazhanov rightly puts it, complicates any reconstructions of the “deep structures” of his later research [Bazhanov, 2008, p. 151].
Here, speaking of influence, we should bear in mind a complicated character of such reconstructions, which frequently enable only plausible, rather than strong, unconditional conclusions. Another issue to consider includes different types of impact that might be exerted by one thinker or philosophical trend on the others. It may be a kind of “imprinting” when certain provisions once captivate or are even adopted by someone but later are rejected and even forgotten; a methodological transfer from one scientific field to another, for example, by analogy; borrowing a conceptual toolkit and its subsequent fine-tuning to a new subject area, etc. [Bazhanov, 2008, p. 148]. In Lakatos' case, there is likely a variety of such influence types.
As known, Lakatos got an orthodox Marxist education and defended a dissertation, written in line with the Marxist tradition. In course of time, he changed his standpoint and emigrated to Britain, where he completed a Ph.D. dissertation and came to the London School of Economics to work under Popper. Along with it, he kept following the new Soviet literature on his themes and, according to V. A. Bazhanov, had quite an active correspondence with Soviet philosophers [Bazhanov, 2009]. Nowadays, it is becoming more evident that in Lakatos' mature thinking, some apparently contradictory influences have merged with Marxism as a significant one. Furthermore, as Kampis, Kvasz and Stoelzner claim some of his major themes, such as the idea of research programs, are anticipated already before his emigration, for instance, in his paper “Modern physics, modern society” published in Hungarian in 1947 [Kampis, Kvasz, Stoelzner, 2002, p. xii]. Actually, Lynch's paper gives a good coverage of the Marxist roots of his thought.
Overall, contemporary researchers of Lakatos' legacy refer to a number of figures and traditions as sources of his thought. Among them there is Hegel, Marxism, Gyцrgy Lukвcs, as well as the Hungarian tradition of mathematics to which Lakatos is indebted through Gyцrgy Polya, Alfred Renyi, Arpad Szabo, Lвszlo Kalmar, etc. [Kampis, Kvasz, Stoelzner, 2002; Dusek, 2015; Motterlini, 2002, etc.]. Additionally, V. A. Bazhanov mentions Vladimir I. Lenin and Sofya A. Yanovskaya (Lakatos studied in Moscow for a while) [Bazhanov, 2009]. Thus, we can see a `synthesis' (V. A. Bazhanov) or a `peculiar mix' (M. Motterlini) of conceptual and methodological sources. Speaking in words by V. Dusek, “Lakatos surreptitiously used Hegelian Marxism in his works on philosophy of science and mathematics, disguising it with the rhetoric of the Popper school” and also “less surreptitiously incorporated, particularly in his treatment of mathematics, work of the strong tradition of heuristics in twentieth century Hungary” [Dusek, 2015, p. 61]. In his characteristic manner, his friend Paul Feyerabend expressed it in a stronger way, though without referring to Lakatos' Hungarian influence - a `philosophical bastard': “a `Pop-Hegelian' born from a Popperian father and a Hegelian mother” [as cited in Motterlini, 2002, p. 488]. Along with it, Lakatos, possibly, was not always aware of the fact that he had been influenced by the above sources; consequently, an “imprinting” is also involved here (on the other hand, such type of influence is likely to be found in any case).
Speaking of Marxism, I, however, should mention that, being an extremely influential ideology and mode of thought, it has differing interpretations among different traditions and followers, as well as their comprehension which version is authentic. Here, actually, it is not always easy to grasp which version of Marxism was adapted by Lakatos himself. According to Dusek, the Marxism of Lakatos shows the influence of G. Lukвcs: “It was this Lukвcs, who returned from the USSR to Hungary after WWII and exercised a direct personal influence on Lakatos” [Dusek, 2015, p. 66]. Apparently, the latter might have experienced the Marxist influence from a variety of sources; along with it, we should significantly consider Marxist-Leninist philosophy here. As for the principle of practice as a major tenet of Marxism, the idea of a dynamic nature of science as activity might have influenced Lakatos from two sources. According to V. Dusek, both the Marxist tradition and the Hungarian heuristic tradition shared a view that contrasted with the mainstream of Anglo-American philosophy of science - a dynamic view of science and an emphasis on practice as opposed to static, formal representations of scientific theories [ibid., 2015, p. 62, 71-72]. Lakatos similarly rejected the formalist conception of the structure of scientific theories dominant in Anglo-American philosophy of science in the middle of the twentieth century (for instance, Richard Braithwaite, Lakatos' PhD advisor, depicted theories as finished formal structures [Dusek, 2015, p. 62]).
According to Dusek, Lakatos' use of rational reconstruction in his account of history has a strong resemblance to that of Marx's account of economic development as not a simple narration of history but rather a schematic model [ibid., 2015, p. 64]. Lakatos similarly does not claim to be simply narrating the actual history of science, but to be presenting a “rational reconstruction” of the sequence of changes not exactly matching the peculiarities of real happenings. In other words, as Georgy P. Shchedrovitsky puts it, Lakatos suggests a kind of situational logic [Shchedrovitsky, 1968, p. 154], which to some extent refers us to the social studies of science. Actually, Lynch's assertion that Lakatos has to be seen as one of the forerunners of a general sociology of scientific knowledge seems a noteworthy idea. In addition to Lynch's arguments, we might refer to Kalmar's works (one of the figures who influenced Lakatos), in which the latter gives some examples of extra-mathematical influences on mathematics; even so this evidence is indirect. In any case, if Lakatos somehow has to be considered through the sociological perspective, his sociology of knowledge would definitely be quite peculiar.
william lynch's marxist roots imre lakatos
Список литературы
Bazhanov, 2008 - Бажанов В.А. Диалектические основания творчества И. Лакатоса // Вопросы философии, 2008. № 9. C. 147-157.
Bazhanov, 2009 - Бажанов В.А. И. Лакатос и философия науки в СССР // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science / Эпистемология и философия науки. 2009. Т 19. № 1. C. 172-187.
Dusek, 2015 - Dusek V Lakatos between Marxism and the Hungarian heuristic tradition // Studies in East European Thought. 2015. Vol. 67. Iss. 1-2. P. 61-73.
Kampis, Kvasz, Stoelzner, 2002 - Kampi G., Kvasz L., Stoelzner M. (Eds.). Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, methodology, and the man. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publ., 2002. 382 p.
Motterlini, 2002 - Motterlini M. Reconstructing Lakatos: a reassessment of Lakatos' epistemological project in the light of the Lakatos Archive // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2002. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 487-509.
Musgrave, Pigden, 2016 - Musgrave A., Pigden Ch. Imre Lakatos // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition) / Ed. by Edward N. Zalta. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lakatos/ (дата обращения: 12.05.2018).
Shchedrovitsky, 1968 - Щедровицкий Г.П. Модели новых фактов для логики // Вопр. философии. 1968. № 4. С. 154-158.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
Confucianism as the source of the fundamental outlook for the Chinese. The history of its occurrence during the reign of the Han dynasty. Significant differences of this philosophy from other major canons. Idealistic views on the development of society.
презентация [889,1 K], добавлен 13.11.2014Why study Indian philosophy. Why study philosophy. The method of asking questions. The Katha Upanishad. The method of analogy. Outline of Indian Philosophy. The Four Vedas. Monism versus Non-dualism. The Epic Period. Sutra Period. The Modern Period.
презентация [661,8 K], добавлен 26.02.2015Fr. Nietzsche as German thinker who lived in the second half of the Nineteenth Century. The essence of the concept of "nihilism". Peculiarities of the philosophy of Socrates. Familiarity with Nietzsche. Analysis of drama "Conscience as Fatality".
доклад [15,3 K], добавлен 09.03.2013Early Life. Glasgow. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Travels on the Continent. The Wealth of Nations. Society and "the invisible hand". Economic growth. After two centuries, Adam Smith remains a towering figure in the history of economic thought.
реферат [29,5 K], добавлен 08.04.2006Chinese economy: history and problems. Problems of Economic Growth. The history of Chinese agriculture. The ratio of exports and imports of goods and service to gross domestic product at current prices. Inefficiencies in the agricultural market.
курсовая работа [162,1 K], добавлен 17.05.2014Terrorism in Spain, Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA): it's history, structure and tactics. The Problems of Ireland, paramilitary groups of Irish Republican Army (IRA): their activity, strength and support. The history of Marxist Greek terrorist organisation.
доклад [43,1 K], добавлен 19.05.2010The Historical Background of Cold War. The Historical Context. Causes and Interpretations. The Cold War Chronology. The War Years. The Truman Doctrine. The Marshall Plan. The Role of Cold War in American History and Diplomacy.
дипломная работа [53,5 K], добавлен 24.05.2003The themes, analysis and solutions raised by feminists with reference to Australian work, and outline a Marxist analysis of violence against women. The importance of violence against women as a political issue. The emergence of women as sexual beings.
реферат [91,4 K], добавлен 20.06.2010Early Life. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Travels on the Continent. The Wealth of Nations. Society and "the invisible hand". Economic growth. After two centuries, Adam Smith remains a towering figure in the history of economic thought.
реферат [13,4 K], добавлен 28.07.2004Economic growth and potential of economic system. The main problems of productive forces in Ukraine. Modern approaches to productivity. Productivity growth in industries. Improvements in infrastructure quality Support of employment of the population.
курсовая работа [15,3 K], добавлен 09.05.2011The first Marxist Workers Group meeting and the first SWAG conference. Some important achievements. Publishing the battler. Major problems. The Toma dispute. Regrоupment discussions. Constitutional crisis. Foundation оf the International Socialists.
эссе [102,5 K], добавлен 23.06.2010The political philosophy is the very important part of the philosophy. The most famous explanations and basic ideas were introduced by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
реферат [10,5 K], добавлен 13.04.2004Problems of child's psychological development. "Hot-Cold" games (for children till 7 years old). Intellectual Eye Measurer. Definitions and classification. Assessment. Computer, teacher's version. Mathematics. Statistics (for training of banking workers).
реферат [46,3 K], добавлен 19.09.2015History is Philosophy teaching by examples. Renaissance, French Revolution and the First World War are important events in the development of the world history. French Revolution is freedom of speech. The First World War is show of the chemical weapons.
реферат [21,6 K], добавлен 14.12.2011Process of accumulation of profit and abundance during the early Middle Ages. The attitude of the person to conditions of creation and reproduction of the property. Fomy Akvinsky's theory about use of money. Reasonings on Christian morals and profit.
эссе [14,1 K], добавлен 19.07.2010Humphrey McQueen's life. The mid-1960s: the moment of the radical student movement led by Maoists and Trotskyists. ASIO and state police Special Branches as record-keepers. H. McQueen's complex intellectual development, his prodigious literary activity.
эссе [60,0 K], добавлен 24.06.2010Productivity Growth in Agriculture: Sources and Constraints. Agriculture in Development Thought. Transition to Sustainability. Economic understanding of process of agricultural development. Technical changes and improvement of efficiency of agriculture.
контрольная работа [31,5 K], добавлен 18.07.2009Biographical information about the childhood and youth of the life of Prince William, his success in learning. Getting them to the rank of officer, participated in the rescue of Russian sailors from a sinking ship "Svonlend". Marriage of Prince William.
презентация [602,0 K], добавлен 29.10.2012Lag in consciousness. Science and the crisis of society. The affirmation of historical materialism. Need for the philosophy. Role of religion. Division of labour is division between manual and mental labour in primitive society. Materialism and idealism.
эссе [89,6 K], добавлен 11.06.2010Opening of maintenance of right of intellectual ownership as to the aggregate of rights on the results of intellectual activity and mean of individualization. Types of intellectual rights: author, patent right, contiguous rights, secrets of production.
реферат [10,1 K], добавлен 08.04.2011