Для чего нужны историки? Заметки о возможностях и пределах дисциплинарной истории

52. Чеканцева З.А. Время историка // Образы времени и исторические представления. Россия - Восток - Запад / Под ред. Л.П. Репиной. - М.: Круг, 2010. - С. 66-78.

53. Breaking Up Time: Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future / Ed. by C. Lorenz, B. Bevernage. - Gottingen; Bristol: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2013. - 274 p.

54. Chakrabarty D. Anthropocene time // Hist. Theory. - 2018. - V. 57, No 1. - P. 5-32.

55. Tanaka S. History without Chronology. - Amherst: Lever Press, 2019. - 278 p.

56. Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism / Ed. by M. Tamm, L. Olivier. - London, N. Y.: Bloomsbury Acad., 2019. - XIV, 226 p.

57. Bevernage B. Transitional justice and historiography: Challenges, dilemmas and possibilities // Macquarie Law J. - 2014. - V. 13. - P. 7-24.

58. Historicites / Ed. by Ch. Delacroix, F. Dosse, P. Garcia. - Paris: La Decouverte, 2009. - 304 р.

59. Truper H. The flatness of historicity // Hist. Theory. - 2019. - V. 58, No 1. - P. 23-49.

60. Bevernage B. From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Ideas on a Potential Future of Historical Theory // BMGN - Low Countries Hist. Rev. - 2012. - V. 127, No 4. - P. 113-120.

61. Tamm M., Simon Z.B. More-than-human history. Philosophy of history at the time of the Anthropocene // Philosophy of History: Twenty-First-Century Perspectives / Ed. by

J.-M. Kuukkanen. - London: Bloomsbury Acad., 2021. - P. 198-215.

62. Riot-Sarcey M. Temps et histoire en debat. “Tout s'oublie” et “rien ne passe” // Rev. d'hist. du XIXe siecle. - 2002. - T. 25, F. 2. - P. 7-13.

63. Duclert V. L'avenir de l'histoire. - Paris: Armand Colin, 2010. - 230 p.

64. Tamm M. How to Reinvent the Future? // Hist. Theory. - 2020. - V. 59, No 3. - P. 448458.

65. Helgesson St., Svenungsson J. The Ethos of History: Time and Responsibility. - N.Y.: Berghahn Books, 2018. - 230 p.

66. Simon Z.B. Domesticating the future through history // Time Soc. - 2021. - V. 30, No 4. - P. 494-516.

67. Чеканцева З.А. Path Dependence, политика времени и метаморфозы истории // Вестн. Перм. ун-та. История. - 2020. - №3. - С. 5-16.

References

1. Assmann А. Conclusion: A creed that has lost its believers? Reconfiguring the concepts of time and history. In: Tamm M., Olivier L. (Eds.) Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism. London, New York, Bloomsbury Acad., 2019, pp. 269-284

2. Hartog F. Croire en I'histoire. Paris, Flammarion. 2013. 310 p. (In French)

3. Chekantseva Z.A. Anthropology of historiography and the historian's identity in the 21st century. Istoriya, 2018, vol. 9, no. 8.

4. Gorman J. Historical Judgement: The Limits of Historiographical Choice. Montreal, Kingston, Ithaca, McGill Queen's Univ. Press, 2008. 258 p.

5. Noel P.M. Epistemologie, histoire et historiens: considerations conceptuelles, methodologiques et empiriques autour du discours que les historiens tiennent sur leur savoir. These de doctorat: Histoire. Quebec, 2014. 401 p. (In French)

6. Rockhill G. Interventions in Contemporary Tought. History, Politics, Aesthetics. Edinburgh, Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2016. 277 p.

7. Gumbrecht H.U. The cold embrace of “science”, or why the humanities better be “humanities and arts”. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2006, no. 5, pp. 7-17. (In Russian)

8. Bourdieu P. For rationalist historicism. In: Sotsio-Logos postmodernizma'97: Al'manakh Rossiisko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiol. issledovanii In-ta sotsiologii RAN [Socio-Logos of Postmodern- ism'97: Almanac of the Russian-French Center for Sociology. Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow, Inst. Eksp. Sotsiol., 1996, pp. 9-29 (In Russian)

9. Quenet G. L'Anthropocene et le temps des historiens. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 2017, T. 72, F. 2, pp. 267-299.

10. Delanty G., Mota A. Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, governance, knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 2017, vol. 20, no 1, pp. 9-38.

11. Bonnueul Ch., Fressor J-B. L'evenement Anthropocene. La Terre, I'histoire et nous. Paris, Ed. Seuil, 2016. 320 p. (In French)

12. Domanska E. The new age of the Anthropocene. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2014, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 96-101.

13. Charbonnier P. Genealogie de l'Antropocene. La fin du risque et des limites. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 2017, T. 72, F. 2, pp. 301-328.

14. Lavlok D. Revenge of the Gaia. Santa Barbara (Calif.), Allen Lane, Basic Books, 2006. 192 p.

15. Chakrabarty D. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 2009, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 197-222.

16. Anthropocene. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 2018, T. 72, F. 2, pp. 263-265.

17. Pisarev A., Gavrilenko S. In search of an evanescent object: Science and its history. Logos, 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1-28. (In Russian)

18. Daston L. The history of science and the history of knowledge. Logos, 2020, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 63-89. (In Russian)

19. Monteil L., Romerio A. From disciplines to “studies”. Knowledge, trajectories, policies. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, 2017, T. 11, F.°3, pp. a-m.

20. Pomian K. L'histoire de la science et l'histoire de l'histoire. Annales. Economies, Societes, Civilisations, 1975, T. 30, F. 5, pp. 935-952.

21. Daston L., Galison P. Objectivity. New York, Zone Books, 2007. 504 p.

22. Galison P. Ten problems in history and philosophy of science. Isis, 2008, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 111-124.

23. Simon Z.B. The role of history in an anthropocenic knowledge regime. Public History Weekly, 2021, Feb. 11.

24. Osborne P. Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics. Theory, Culture & Society, 2015, vol. 32, nos. 5-6, pp. 3-35.

25. Popova T.N. Distsiplinarnyi obraz nauki. Podkhody i ponyatiya [The Disciplinary Image of Science. Approaches and Concepts]. Odessa, Bondarenko M.A., 2019. 392 p. (In Russian)

26. Ramos A. da S. Ethan Kleinberg: Theory of history as hauntology. Historia da Historiografia, 2017, vol. 10, no. 25, pp. 212-228.

27. Simon Z.B. History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century. London, Bloomsbury Acad., 2019. 224 p.

28. Domanska E. Unbinding from humanity: Nandipha Mntambo's Europa and the limits of history and identity. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2020, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 310-336.

29. Nora P. Presentation. Le Debat, 2013, T. 177, F. 5, pp. 3-5. (In French)

30. Huyssen A. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, Stanford Univ. Press, 2003. 177 p.

31. Langlois Ch.-V., Seignobog Ch. Introduction aux etudes historiques. Paris, Hachette, 1898. 308 p. (In French)

32. Poltavtseva N. Poltavtseva N. Is history historical? Voprosy Literatury, 1997, no. 2, pp. 59-65. (In Russian)

33. Morsel J. Traces? Quelles traces? Reflexions pour une histoire non passeiste. Revue historique, 2016, T. 680, F. 4, pp. 813-868.

34. White H. The Practical Past. Evanston, Northwestern Univ. Press, 2014. XVI, 118 p.

35. Khmelevskaya Yu.Yu. Historians and the “useful past”: On disciplinary limitations and disciplining functions of history in contemporary society. Vestnik Permskogo Univrsiteta. Istoriya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 62-173. (In Russian)

36. Runia E. Presence. History and Theory, 2006, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1-29.

37. Runia E., Tamm M. The past is not a foreign country: A conversation. Rethinking History, 2019, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 403-433.

38. Heidegger M. Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. Kharkiv, Folio, 2003. 503 p. (In Russian)

39. Elias N. Du Temps. Paris, Fayard, 1997. 226 p. (In French)

40. Boucheron P., Casanova V. L'histoire pour espacer le temps. Entretien avec Patrick Boucheron. Ecrire I'histoire: Histoire, Litterature, Esthetique, 2013, F. 11, pp. 75-86.

41. Lorenz С. Out of time? Some critical reflections on Francois Hartog's presentism. In: Tamm M., Olivier L. (Eds.) Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London, New York, Bloomsbury Acad., 2019, pp. 23-42.

42. Garcia P. Histoire du temps present. In: Delacroix Ch., Dosse F., Garcia P., Offenstadt N. (Eds.) Historiographies: concepts et debats. T. 1. Paris, Gallimard. 2010, pp. 282-294. (In French)

43. Tamm M. Beyond history and memory: New perspectives in memory studies. History Compass, 2013, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 458-473.

44. White H. The burden of history. History and Theory, 1966, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111-134.

45. Oleinikov A. Hayden White as a public historian. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2019, no. 1, pp. 95-105. (In Russian)

46. Meschonnic H. Critique du rythme, Anthropologie historique du langage. Lagrasse, Verdier, 1982. 730 p. (In French)

47. Domanska E. Hayden White and liberation historiography. Rethinking History, 2015, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 640-650.

48. Chekantseva Z.A. History on the threshold of the third millennium: Between epistemology and social control. In: Z.A. Chekantseva (Ed.) Istoriki v poiskakh novykh perspektiv [Historians in Search of New Perspectives]. Moscow, Akvilon, 2019. 416 p. (In Russian)

49. Domanska E. Beyond anthropocentrism in historical studies. Historein, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 118-130. doi: 10.12681/historein.11.

50. Le Goff J. Le changement dans la continuity. Espaces Temps., 1986, F. 34-35: Braudel dans tous ses etats. La vie quotidienne des sciences sociales sous l'empire de Ehistoire. Dosse F. (Ed. Intellect.), pp. 20-22. (In French)

51. Koselleck R. Le futur passe: contribution a la semantique des temps historiques. Paris, Ed. de l'EHESS, 1990. 334 p. (In French)

52. Chekantseva Z.A. The historian's time. In: Repina L.P. (Ed.) Obrazy vremeni i istoricheskiepred- stavleniya. Rossiya - Vostok - Zapad [Images of Time and Historical Views. Russia - East - West]. Moscow, Krug, 2010, pp. 66-78. (In Russian)

53. Breaking Up Time: Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future. Lorenz C., Bevernage B. (Eds.). Gottingen, Bristol, Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, 2013. 274 p.

54. Chakrabarty D. Anthropocene time. History and Theory, 2018, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 5-32

55. Tanaka S. History without Chronology. Amherst, Lever Press, 2019. 278 p.

56. Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism. Tamm M., Olivier L. (Eds.). London, New York, Bloomsbury Acad., 2019. XIV, 226 p.

57. Bevernage B. Transitional justice and historiography: Challenges, dilemmas and possibilities. Macquarie Law Journal, 2014, vol. 13, pp. 7-24.

58. Historicites. Delacroix Ch., Dosse F., Garcia P. (Ed.). Paris, La Decouverte, 2009. 304 p. (In French)

59. Truper H. The flatness of historicity. History and Theory, 2019, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 23-49.

60. Bevernage B. From philosophy of history to philosophy of historicities: Some ideas on a potential future of historical theory. BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, 2012, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 113-120.

61. Tamm M., Simon Z.B. More-than-human history. Philosophy of history at the time of the Anthropocene. In: Kuukkanen J.-M. (Ed.) Philosophy of History: Twenty-First-Century Perspectives. London, Bloomsbury Acad., 2021, pp. 198-215

62. Riot-Sarcey M. Temps et histoire en debat. “Tout s'oublie” et “rien ne passe”. Revue d'histoire du XIXe siecle, 2002, T. 25, F. 2, pp. 7-13. (In French)

63. Duclert V. L 'avenir de I'histoire. Paris, Armand Colin, 2010. 230 p. (In French)

64. Tamm M. How to reinvent the future? History and Theory, 2020, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 448-458

65. Helgesson St., Svenungsson J. The Ethos of History: Time and Responsibility. New York, Berghahn Books, 2018. 230 p.

66. Simon Z.B. Domesticating the future through history. Time & Society, 2021, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 494-516

67. Chekantseva Z.A. Path dependence, politics of time and metamorphosis of history. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Istoriya, 2020, no. 3, pp. 5-16.

Размещено на allbest.ru