Rosenzweig and Bakhtin. Hermeneutics of language and verbal art in the system of the philosophy of dialogue
Hermeneutics of language and verbal creativity in the system of dialogue philosophy of Rosenzweig and Bakhtin. The desire to create a new philosophical system, radically rethinking the very subject of philosophy. Fundamentality of language and literature.
| Рубрика | Философия |
| Вид | статья |
| Язык | английский |
| Дата добавления | 28.07.2023 |
| Размер файла | 36,1 K |
Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже
Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.
Attitude to Ontology
As we have noted, the departure from traditional ontology in the philosophical teachings of Rosenzweig and Bakhtin does not imply a rejection of the problem of being. From the basis of philosophy, as it has been since Parmenides, being is transformed into the subject of research. Overall, the critique of ontology within the philosophy of dialog can be seen as a transition from static to dynamics. The word dialogue has the same root as ontology. Dialog denotes the transition or movement of thought-language activity. Instead of binding the logos to being, dialogue involves its dynamic transformation. This dynamism of the logos is explored variously by different philosophers. Rosenzweig considers it from more general universal positions and composes it in the concept's framework of dynamic gestalt. In Bakhtin, being is understood as a joint interpersonal process. In both philosophers, the linguistic verbal dynamics seem to hover above being. The criticism of Rosenzweig's ontology is taken up by Levinas, who adds important points to the understanding of interpersonal dynamics and brings a new ethical dimension to philosophy [32].
The Place of Language and Verbal Art
When speaking of the linguistic turn in 20th-century philosophy, one primarily refers to analytic philosophy. Meanwhile, the turn to language and literature in the philosophy of Rosenzweig and Bakhtin is much more fundamental and profound. For these authors, it is not simply a question of a change in the orientation of cognition and its focus on the clarification of language, but a radical transformation of the entire system of thought, a change in the philosophical paradigm that affects all areas of culture. While Rosenzweig and Bakhtin understand the centrality of language and verbalism in the philosophical system, there is a significant difference in their positions. Rosenzweig focuses on a radical revision of the philosophy of language, as expressed in his concept of the grammatical organon. Bakhtin is concerned with the study of literature as a holistic phenomenon, which leads him to an entirely new theory of literature. Given the intrinsic kinship of these two approaches, they exhibit a surprising mutual complementarity. Rosenzweig's linguistics and Bakhtin's literary studies combine well and provide excellent preconditions for the development of a philosophy of dialogue.
Rosenzweig and Bakhtin in Philosophy of the Dialogue in the Future
We have already noted that the term philosophy of the dialogue is less appropriate for the teachings of Rosenzweig and Bakhtin than for, say, Buber's philosophy. It is these authors who have contributed fundamental and profound ideas to the philosophy of dialogue. They approach this field from different angles and the correlation of their approaches is extremely fruitful for philosophical research. For all these reasons, Rosenzweig and Bakhtin can be seen as crucial sources for the philosophy of dialogue of the future.
References
[1] Perlina N. Bakhtin and Buber: Problems of Dialogic Imagination. Studies in 20th Century Literature. 1984:9(1): 13--28. https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.n49
[2] Friedman M. Martin Buber and Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogue of Voices and the Word that is Spoken. In: Dialogue as a Means of Collective Communication. Banathy B and Jenlink PM, editors. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2005. p. 29--40.
[3] Makhlin VL. I and the Other: Towards the History of the Dialogical Principle in the Philosophy of the Twentieth Century. Moscow: Labirint; 1997. (In Russian).
[4] Frank SL. Mystical Philosophy of Rosenzweig. Put'. 1926;(2):139--148. (In Russian).
[5] Belov VN. Review on the book: Franz Rosenzweig. The Star of Redemption. Voprosy ftlosofti. 2018;(7):218--220. (In Russian).
[6] Nikolaev NI. Lectures and speeches of M. M. Bakhtin 1924-1925, in the notes of Pumpyatnsky LV. In: Bakhtin MM as a Philosopher. Moscow: Nauka; 1992. p. 221--252. (In Russian).
[7] Dvorkin I. Bakhtin and Cohen: The First Stages in Building the Philosophical System. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2021;25(3):436-456. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302- 2021-25-3-436-456
[8] Rosenzweig F. The Star of Redemption. Galli BE (tr.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 2005.
[9] Dvorkin I. The Place of Hermann Cohen's Ideas in the Philosophy of Dialogue. Kantian Journal. 2020;39(4):62--94. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2020-4-3
[10] Holquist M. Dialogism Bakhtin and his World. London and New York: Routledge; 2002.
[11] Soboleva M. Die Philosophie Michail Bachtins. Von der existenziellen Ontologie zur dialogischen Vernunft. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag; 2010.
[12] Bienenstock M. Cohen face a Rosenzweig: Debat sur lapensee allemande. Paris: Vrin; 2009.
[13] Bakhtin MM. Art and answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. Holquist M and Liapunov V, editors. Liapunov V (tr.). Texas: University of Texas Press; 1990.
[14] Bakhtin MM. Toward a philosophy of the Act. Holquist M and Liapunov V, editors. Liapunov V (tr.). Texas: University of Texas Press; 1999.
[15] Rosenzweig F. The New Thinking. In: Philosophical and Theological Writings. Franks PW and Morgan ML, editors and tr. Indianapolis: Hacket; 2000. p. 109--139.
[16] Makhlin VL. “Systematic concept” (Notes on the history of the Nevelskoy school). Nevel'skij sbornik. 1996;(1):75--88. (In Russian).
[17] Pollock B. Franz Rosenzweig and the Systematic Task of Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
[18] Dvorkin I. The Concept of Grammatical Organon in the Star of Redemption by Rosenzweig. Religions. 2021;12(945):1--13. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110945
[19] Makhlin VL. “Participatory thinking”. Philosophical project of M.M. Bakhtin in the context of the ontological turn of the 20th century. Istoriko-filosofskiy ezhegodnik. 2018;33:267-292. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21267/AQUILO.2018.33.21039.
[20] Buber M. The History of the Dialogical Principle. In: Between Man and Man. Gregor- Smith R (tr.). London and New York: Routledge; 2002. p. 249--264.
[21] Casper B. Das dialogische Denken: Eine Untersuchung der religionsphilosophischen Bedeutung Franz Rosenzweigs, Ferdinand Ebners und Martin Bubers. Freiburg, Basel & Wien: Herder; 1967.
[22] Lyapunov V. A few unpretentious recommendations for readers of Bakhtin. Bakhtinskiy sbornik. 2004;5:195--209. (In Russian).
[23] Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Guyer P and Wood AW (tr.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
[24] Bakhtin MM. Collected Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur; 2003. (In Russian).
[25] Cohen H. Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism. Kaplan S (tr.). New York: F. Ungar; 1972.
[26] Poma A. The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Denton J (tr.). Albany: SUNY Press; 1997.
[27] Kagan MI. On the Course of History. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur; 2004. (In Russian).
[28] Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Ttibingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag; 1967.
[29] Bonetskaya NK. Bakhtin through the eyes of a metaphysician. Moscow -- St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives; 2016. (In Russian).
[30] Theunissen M. The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Buber. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.
[31] Bakhtin MM. Collected Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Russkie slovari; 2000. (In Russian).
[32] Gibbs R. Jurisprudence is the Organon of Ethics: Kant and Cohen on Ethics, Law, and Religion. In: Hermann Cohen's Critical idealism. Munk R, editor. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. p. 193--230.
Размещено на Allbest.ru
...Подобные документы
Confucianism as the source of the fundamental outlook for the Chinese. The history of its occurrence during the reign of the Han dynasty. Significant differences of this philosophy from other major canons. Idealistic views on the development of society.
презентация [889,1 K], добавлен 13.11.2014Why study Indian philosophy. Why study philosophy. The method of asking questions. The Katha Upanishad. The method of analogy. Outline of Indian Philosophy. The Four Vedas. Monism versus Non-dualism. The Epic Period. Sutra Period. The Modern Period.
презентация [661,8 K], добавлен 26.02.2015Fr. Nietzsche as German thinker who lived in the second half of the Nineteenth Century. The essence of the concept of "nihilism". Peculiarities of the philosophy of Socrates. Familiarity with Nietzsche. Analysis of drama "Conscience as Fatality".
доклад [15,3 K], добавлен 09.03.2013Language picture of the world, factors of formation. The configuration of the ideas embodied in the meaning of the words of the native language. Key ideas for Russian language picture of the world are. Presentation of the unpredictability of the world.
реферат [17,2 K], добавлен 11.10.2015Confucianism as the creation of a harmonious society in the ancient pattern, in which every person has a function. Creativity and the ability of a person to self-renew as a guarantee of human constancy. Methods of constructing harmonious society.
эссе [14,0 K], добавлен 10.01.2014Language as main means of intercourse. Cpornye and important questions of theoretical phonetics of modern English. Study of sounds within the limits of language. Voice system of language, segmental'nye phonemes, syllable structure and intonation.
курсовая работа [22,8 K], добавлен 15.12.2010The history of the English language. Three main types of difference in any language: geographical, social and temporal. Comprehensive analysis of the current state of the lexical system. Etymological layers of English: Latin, Scandinavian and French.
реферат [18,7 K], добавлен 09.02.2014Everyone lives his own life relying on some ideas, thoughts and some beliefs. Some people call such ideas “philosophy” of life. Even if a person says that he doesn’t live according to some rules or ideas, he defines himself as a follower of such "never-ca
топик [4,5 K], добавлен 12.11.2006Some facts about origin of language. Literature is important, because it is subservient to all objects, even those of the very highest concern. Religion, morality, liberty and government, fame and happiness, are alike interested in the cause of letters.
курсовая работа [28,9 K], добавлен 14.02.2010Background of borrowed words in the English language and their translation. The problems of adoptions in the lexical system and the contribution of individual linguistic cultures for its formation. Barbarism, foreignisms, neologisms and archaic words.
дипломная работа [76,9 K], добавлен 12.03.2012Federalism and the Tax System. Federal Taxes and Intergovernmental Revenues. Tax Reform. The Progressivity of the Tax System. Political Influences on the Tax System. Main principles of US tax system. The importance of Social Security taxes.
реферат [15,9 K], добавлен 01.12.2006Process of learning a foreign language with from an early age. The main differences between the concepts of "second language" and "foreign language" by the conditions of the language environment. Distinguish different types of language proficiency.
статья [17,3 K], добавлен 15.09.2014From the history of notion and definition of neologism. Neologisms as markers of culture in contemporary system of language and speech. Using of the neologisms in different spheres of human activity. Analysis of computer neologisms in modern English.
научная работа [72,8 K], добавлен 13.08.2012History of English language and literature. The progress of English literature in early times was slow, will not seem wonderful to those who consider what is affirmed of the progress of other arts, more immediately connected with the comforts of life.
курсовая работа [27,2 K], добавлен 14.02.2010The area of the finite verb including particular questions tense, aspect and modal auxiliary usage. The categories of verb morphology: time, possibility, hypothesis, desirability, verb agreement. American sign language and the category of voice.
курсовая работа [41,3 K], добавлен 21.07.2009Communication process is not limited to what we say with words. There are 3 elements of communication: Words (7% of information is communicated though words), Body language (55%) and tone of voice (38%). Thus, 93% of communication is non-verbal.
топик [4,5 K], добавлен 25.08.2006Nonverbal methods of dialogue and wrong interpretation of gestures. Historical both a cultural value and universal components of language of a body. Importance of a mimicry in a context of an administrative communication facility and in an everyday life.
эссе [19,0 K], добавлен 27.04.2011Traditional periodization of historical stages of progress of English language. Old and middle English, the modern period. The Vocabulary of the old English language. Old English Manuscripts, Poetry and Alphabets. Borrowings in the Old English language.
презентация [281,2 K], добавлен 27.03.2014A critical knowledge of the English language is a subject worthy of the attention of all who have the genius and the opportunity to attain it. A settled orthography is of great importance, as a means of preserving the etymology and identity of words.
курсовая работа [28,1 K], добавлен 14.02.2010Theoretical problems of linguistic form Language. Progressive development of language. Polysemy as the Source of Ambiguities in a Language. Polysemy and its Connection with the Context. Polysemy in Teaching English on Intermediate and Advanced Level.
дипломная работа [45,3 K], добавлен 06.06.2011
