The Analysis of manager’s levels of school manager’s emotional intelligence

PhD Student of Educational Administration, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University at Cherkasy

According to Table 1, at the best level, an individual has a quite high level of emotional intelligence and can stay strong even under high pressure without losing their abilities such as creativity and influence. At the advanced level, the individual can be said to have a continuous and balanced level of emotional intelligence in most situations. At the sensitive level, the individual's level of emotional intelligence displays irregularities in terms of their abilities and skills, and thus may vary from one situa-

According to Table 2, 17 (24.6%) of the participants were female and 52 (75.4%) were male. 10 (14.5%) of the participants were between the ages of 21-30, 45 (65.2%) were between 31-40 years old, 6 (8.7%)

Table 2 Demographic Information of Participants

tion to the other. At the careful level, the individual faces difficulties because of a low level of emotional intelligence and concentration on a topic, which often results in failure.

FINDINGS

In this part of the research, the findings obtained from the analysis are given. The personal information of the managers within the scope of the research is shown in Table 2.

were between 41-50 years old and 8 (11,6%) is 51 years and over. According to the length of service of the participants, 32 (46.4%) were between 1-5 years, 18 (26.1%) were between 6-10 years, and 16

(23.2%) were between 11-20 years and 3 (4.3%) are over 21 years and over. 3 (4.3%) of the participants were graduated from college, 55 (79.7%) of them were licence and 11 (15.9%) of them were postgraduate.

The results of the responses given by the managers to the frequency of their be haviors regarding the awareness of their feelings, expressing their feelings and showing the ways of behaving about the dimensions of others ' feelings are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Frequency and Percentage Distributions Showing Behavior Patterns

According to Table 3, the behaviors that define the dimension of being aware of the emotions of the managers are at the best level according to the evaluation scale given in Table 1, in the 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th, 5^th and 11^th positions, in the 7 ^th and 10 ^th rank behaviors at the advanced level, 8 ^th and 9 ^th behaviors are at a sensitive level.

6^th, “I can judge myself from the perspectives of others” behavior is realized on the same scale at the level of attention, and it is understood that participants are unable to judge themselves from the perspectives of others.

According to Table 3, managers to express their feelings, behaviors, defining the size, 12^th, 13^th, 15^th, 19^th, and 21^st according to the evaluation scale given in Table 1, the next behaviors are at the best level, 14^th, 17^th and 20^th the next behavior is seen to be advanced.

16 ^th next is “I keep my feelings to myself”, 18^th the next “I find it difficult to explain my need for help” behavior has been realized at the level of attention on the same scale. According to this, it is observed that the participants opened their feelings to their heads and expressed their need for help in a normal way. 22^nd he next “I have difficulty talking to people who share my opinion” behavior seems to be at the same level of sensitivity.

According to Table 3; behaviors that define the dimension of being aware of the feelings of others are observed to be at an advanced level according to the evaluation scale given in Table 1 of the 23^rd, 25^th, 27^th, 28^th, 29^th, 30^th, 31^st, 32^nd and 33^rd behaviors.

24 ^th the next “I hit others 'mistakes in their faces” behavior takes place at the same level of precision, according to the same scale, and it can be said that participants are sensitive when they say others' mistakes. 26^th the next “I am a good listener” is the best one on the same scale, and it can be said that the participants are always a good listener.

The average, scores and levels of the school administrators 'awareness of their feelings, expressing their feelings and awareness of others' feelings are presented in Table 4.Table 4

Average, Score and Level Information About Sub-dimensions

As can be seen in Table 4, the average of the managers' awareness of the emotions and the awareness of the emotions of others and the corresponding scores are at the advanced level according to the evaluation scale given in Table 1, and at the best level in terms of expressing the feelings, They can be interpreted as having a continuous and balanced level of emotional intelligence.

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

According to the results of the study conducted to examine the level of emotional intelligence of school administrators, it is seen that the school administrators have reached the best level in the subdimension of expressing their emotions, which are three dimensions of emotional intelligence. Accordingly, school administrators have no problem in expressing their feelings. It is observed that they have reached the advanced level according to the awareness of their feelings and awareness of others' feelings. According to this, managers have been found to have a continuous and balanced level of emotional intelligence in many cases, being aware of their emotions and being aware of others' feelings.

Similar studies are important in other dimensions of emotional intelligence, as well as in managers and other employees in different business environments and different research universes, as it will allow comparison of results.

It can be expressed as another suggestion that the organizations of the organizations providing formal education and the inservice training programs, emotions, emotion management and emotional intelligence issues should be included.

References

1.Mandell, B., Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership Style. Journal of Business and Psychology. 17(2):387-404.

2.Qakar, U. and Arbak, Y. (2003). Changing Emotion- Intelligence Relationship and Emotional Intelligence in the Light of Modern Approaches. Unpublished Work.

3.Mayer, J. D. and Salovey, P. (1993) The Intelligence of Emotional Intelligence. Intelligence. 17: 433-442.

4.Lam, L.T. & Kirby, S.L. (2002) Is Emotional Intelligence an Advantage? An Exploration of the Impact of Emotional and General Intelligence on Individual Performance. The Journal of Social Psychology. 142(1): 133-143.

5.Dokmen, U. (2000). Consolidate Develop. System Publishing. Istanbul.

6.Goleman, D. (1998). Emotional Intelligence.

3.Printing. Trans. B. S. High. Asset Publications. Istanbul.

7.Cooper, R. and Sawaf, A. (1999). Emotional Intelligence In Leadership. Trans. Z.B. Ayman and B. Sancar. System Publishing. Istanbul.

8.James, J. (1997). The Next Time You Think About It. Trans. Z. Dicleli. Boyner Holding Publications. Istanbul.

9.Healy, J., M. (1999). Your Child's Developing Mind. Qev: A.B. Dicleli. Boyner Holding Publications. Istanbul.

10.Cooper, R. K. and Sawaf, A. (2000). Emotional intelligence in leadership. Istanbul: Sistem Publishing.

11.Clark, L. (2000). Help with emotions. (Translated by Gultekin Yazgan). Istanbul: Evrim Publishing House.

12.Thomas, M., A. (2004), “Understanding Emotional Intelligence Can Help Alter Problem Behavior”, Physician Executive.

13.Guney, S. (2000). Behavioral Sciences. Nobel Publishing House, Ankara.

14.Balta§, A. (2000). Emotional Intelligence of Companies Gives High Energy. Beko News Magazine. Issue: 2 1.

15.Pamukoglu, E. (2004). Investigation of the role of emotional intelligence in executive activity in the context of female managers and research. Unpublished master thesis, Kocaeli University.

16.Gьllьce, A. З. (2006). Relationship between occupational burnout and emotional intelligence. Unpublished master's thesis, Atatьrk University.

17.Sahin, F. (2006). The relationship of emotional intelligence with effective leadership behaviors: A study on officers and non-commissioned officers working in Kayseri Military Service Department. Unpublished master thesis, Balikesir University.

18.Acar, F. (2002). Emotional intelligence and leadership. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 12, pp.53-68.

19.Turanli, A. (2007). Emotional intelligence of primary school principals and job satisfaction levels of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylьl University.

20.Karaku§, M. (2008). The effect of primary school administrators and teachers 'emotional intelligence competencies on teachers' emotional commitment, organizational citizenship and job satisfaction levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Firat University.

21.Acar, F. T. (2001). The relationship between emotional intelligence skills and task-oriented leadership behavior. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Istanbul University.

22.Tikir, N. (2005). Examining the relationship between primary school principals' instructional leadership behavior and emotional intelligence. Unpublished master's thesis, Gaziantep University.

23.Bardach, R. H. (2008). Leading schools with emotional intelligence: A study of the degree of association between middle school principal emotional intelligence and school success. Unpublished doctora dissertation, Capella University.

24.Ergin, D. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in school management. Unpublished master thesis, Kocaeli University.

25.Tuna, Y. (2008). Emotional intelligence competencies of managers in organizational communication process. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Anadolu University.

26.Canbulat, S. (2007). To investigate the effect of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction of employees. Unpublished master thesis, Gazi University.

27.Trucker, M. L., Sojka, J. Z., Barone, F. J. and Mccarthy, A. M. (2000). Training tomorrow's leaders: Enhancing the emotional intelligence of business graduates. Journal of Education for Business. 75(6), 331-7.

Размещено на Allbest.ru