Violence as a key manifestation of social problems in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The development of deviant and delinquency forms of behaviour that become socially acceptable and have a negative impact on society. Social psychiatry and individual social consciousness. Social disease caused by unfavourable socio-economic conditions.

Рубрика Психология
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 03.03.2021
Размер файла 32,2 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

VIOLENCE AS A KEY MANIFESTATION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

В.C. Milosevic Soso

University of East Sarajevo Alekse Santica St., 1, Pale, 71000, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The term `social problem' was first introduced as a synonym for `illnesses' under unfavorable social-economic conditions [9]. Social problems are considered by social science when it comes to their negative consequences for satisfying one's needs and self-realization [15]. According to R. Metron and R. Nisbet, social problems are “the result of mismatch between social values and reality; the effect of social causes that are considered unfavorable; they can be manifest and latent; they have social consequences and determine planned and meaningful social actions” [10. P. 156]. The article focuses on the social problems in a part of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) -- the Republic of Srpska -- to prevent and minimize them even in their most sociopathic forms. The empirical study was conducted on the sample of 220 respondents (105 male and 113 female) from October 2016 to January 2017 in seven municipalities of the Republic of Srpska as a part of B&H. The author wanted to estimate the respondents' awareness of certain notions related to the pathological sexual assaults (paraphilias) and on the level of domestic violence in particular against women.

The study combined empirical and theoretical parts to test the authors' hypotheses. Among them an assumption that many respondents do not know the meaning and are not in any other ways familiar with different types of paraphilias. Another author's assumption was that women of the Republic of Srpska are more exposed to specific types of violence, which is still not enough discussed in public due to the traditional communicative and social barriers. The third author's hypothesis was that women are more exposed to psychological and physical violence due to unfavorable social-economic conditions. To prove this the author used statistical data to assess the relationship of different features of the sample and reveal the factors affecting the development and changes in the above mentioned social problems. If the factors considered in the article are not publicly recognized and discussed the current situation will lead to the highly deviant (delinquent) behaviour that will turn into a socially acceptable model and determine serious negative consequences for the society.

Key words: social problem; violence; paraphilia; domestic violence; survey; the Republic of Srpska

НАСИЛИЕ КАК ОСНОВНОЕ ПРОЯВЛЕНИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ПРОБЛЕМ В БОСНИИ И ГЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ

Б.Ч. Милошевич Шошо

Университет Восточного Capaeвo

Ул. Алексе Шантича, 1, Пале, 71000, Республика Сербская, Босния и Герцеговина

Понятие «социальная проблема» было впервые использовано в научном дискурсе как синоним «социального заболевания», обусловленного неблагоприятными социально-экономическими условиями [9]. Сегодня социальные проблемы интересуют исследователей с точки зрения их негативных последствий для удовлетворения индивидуальных потребностей, в том числе в самореализации [15]. Согласно трактовке Р. Мертона и Р. Нисбета, социальные проблемы -- «результат рассогласования между социальными ценностями и окружающей действительностью; следствие неблагоприятных социальных условий; они могут быть явными и латентными; они порождают социальные последствия и диктуют продуманные и осмысленные социальные действия» [10. P. 156].

Автор рассматривает социальные проблемы в части Боснии и Герцеговины (БиГ) -- Республике Сербской, стремясь способствовать их предотвращению и минимизации даже в самых социально-патологических формах. В период с октября 2016 по январь 2017 года было опрошено 220 респондентов (105 мужчин и 113 женщин) в семи муниципалитетах Республики Сербской. Автор оценивает осведомленность респондентов о значении разных форм патологического сексуального поведения (парафилиях) и уровень домашнего насилия, особенно в отношении женщин. Проект сочетал эмпирический и теоретический поиск, в частности разработку и проверку следующих гипотез: большинство респондентов не имеют представления о многих видах парафилии; женщины наиболее подвержены психологическому и физическому насилию вследствие меньших социально-экономических возможностей, и эта проблема почти не обсуждается в обществе вследствие устойчивости традиционных коммуникативных и социальных барьеров. Для подтверждения этих гипотез автор оценивает взаимосвязь разных переменных опроса и показывает, какие факторы влияют на названные социальные проблемы. Их дальнейшее замалчивание способствует развитию девиантных (и деликвентных) форм поведения, которые становятся социально приемлемыми и негативно влияют на общество.

Ключевые слова: социальная проблема; насилие; парафилия; домашнее насилие; опрос; Республика Сербская

deviant socially psychiatry disease

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH

The article presents both an empirical study and a theoretical research or even a theoretical revision based on the relevant empirical facts. Such a revision focusing on theoretical premises, conceptions, and ideas is impossible without a critical approach to the problem under study regarding the ways of its traditional conceptualization for it affects the empirical techniques. The research combines different theoretical finding of Durkheim, Merton, and Parsons, and of some authors from the Balkans such as Milosavljevic, Boskovic, Jugovic, Ljubicic, and others. The hypotheses of the research are based on the argument that the deviant behavior in today's society is rather frequent primarily due to prevalence of illegitimate modes and/or means to satisfy individual and group needs, while the degree of satisfaction of needs in our society depends on the quality of interaction of factors affecting socialization. Furthermore, it was necessary to apply the quantitative methodology to estimate the scale of the problem and measure the relationship of its different aspects and factors [5. P. 134].

The most general part of the survey refers to the social-demographic and social- economic characteristics of respondents (sex, age, education, employment, structure of family, marital status, place of residence, financial situation, membership in political parties, employment status). Another part of the questionnaire refers to the respondents perception of deviant behavior (corruption, delinquent actions, violence) and to their own deviant practices and being victims of such (in various criminal acts, in domestic violence, cyber violence), to their understanding of friendship, their value orientations in everyday life, and so on.

The sample consisted of 220 respondents aged from 18 to 66 and over, 105 males and 113 females. The survey was conducted from October 2016 to January 2017 in seven municipalities of the Republic of Srpska (East Sarajevo, Banja Luka, Trebinje, Pale, SekoviCi, Rogatica and Doboj). Most respondents were aged 18--24 (28,6%) and 32--38 (18,6%); were from Banja Luka (31%), East Sarajevo (18,2%) or Pale (13,6%); live in towns (62,3%); finished high school (58,6%) or have a university degree (22,3%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Social-demographic characteristics of the sample

Characteristics

Number

%

Sex

Male

105

47

Female

113

51,4

No answer

2

1

Total

220

100

Age

18--24

63

28,6

25--31

36

16,4

32--38

41

18,6

39--45

24

10,9

46--52

26

11,8

53--59

15

6,8

60--66

4

1,8

66+

11

5

Total

220

100

Place of residence

East Sarajevo

40

18,2

Bania Luka

70

31

Doboj

20

9,1

Pale

30

13,6

Trebinje

20

9,1

Rogatica

20

9,1

Sekovici

20

9,1

Total

220

100

Type of residence

Urban area

137

62,3

Suburban area

51

23,2

Rural area

31

14,1

No answer

1

0,5

Total

220

100

Education

Without elementary school

3

1,4

Elementary school

6

2,7

High school

129

58,6

Higher school

26

11,8

Academic degree

49

22,3

MBA degree or doctorate

7

3,2

Total

220

100

More than a half of the sample are unemployed (59,1%), in particular students (22,3%). Considering the period of their unemployment, most are unemployed for 1--3 years (8,2%), 4--7 years (9,1%), 8--11 years (5,5%) or for more than 12 years (7,3%). The most frequent reasons for unemployment are as follows: fired as an unnecessary employee (5,9%); the employer closed the company (6,4%); got fired (3,6%); never had a chance to be employed (27,3%). Among the unemployed 27,7% are registered at the Bureau of Employment. Among the 40% employed 17,3% work in the public sector, while 21,8% -- in private sector. Usually, the respondents have their own apartments or houses (39,5%) mainly owned by their parents (47,3%). 42,3% are married, 45,5% -- not married. As a rule, the respondents live in a family of four members (35,5%), 26,9% -- a family of five and more members (Table 2).

Table 2 Social-economic characteristics of the sample

Characteristics of the surveyors

Number

%

Working status

Employed

88

40

Unemployed

130

59,1

No answer

2

1

Total

220

100

Status of the unemployed

Pupil

1

5

Student

51

22,3

Housewife

25

11,4

Pensioner

12

5,5

Looking for employment

44

15

No answer

87

39,4

Total

220

100

Unemployment period

1--3 years

18

8,2

4--7 years

20

9,1

8--11 years

12

5,5

12 years and more

16

7,3

No answer

154

70

Total

220

100

Reasons of unemployment

Fired as unnecessary employee

13

5,9

The employer closed the company

14

6,4

Got fired

8

3,6

Wanted to find another job

3

1,4

Illness or injury

3

1,4

You felt too old to work

3

1,4

Have never been employed

60

27,3

Have never looked for a job because a partner does not allow to

1

0,5

No answer

120

52,3

Total

220

100

The unemployed registered at the Bureau of Employment

Yes

61

27,7

No

97

44,1

No answer

62

28,2

Total

220

100

The type of employment

Private/public

38

17,3

Miscellaneous

3

1,4

Private

48

21,8

No answer

131

59,5

Total

220

100

Marital status

Married

94

42,3

Unmarried

100

45,5

Divorced

10

4,5

Widower/widow

10

4,5

Extramarital cohabitation

5

2,4

No answer

1

0,5

Total

220

100

Number of family members

Three

74

3,6

Four

78

35,5

Five

34

15,5

Six or more

25

11,4

No answer

9

4,1

Total

220

100

Place of living

Personal ownership

87

39,5

Parental ownership

104

47,3

Tenant

25

11,4

No answer

3

1,9

Total

220

100

The results of the survey

Social problems are usually defined as phenomena perceived by the majority of population as a cause-and-effect relationship being problematic and demanding a systematic prevention [15. P. 377]. According to Merton and Nisbet's typology of social problems, the research focused on the phenomena recognized as social problems in the Republic of Srpska. Further, the results of the survey are divided into thematic parts relevant to the aims of the research such as the awareness of the specific paraphilias, and whether the respondents have been victims of any types of domestic violence. Paraphilias have “incriminatory characteristics for they deal with misdemeanors, sometimes even with felonies” [4. P. 200]. Paraphilias refer to “any sort of aberrant sexual behavior that is preferred over the heterosexual, and that deviates from the culturally acceptable norms, while the quality or object of the sexual instinct is abnormal” [11. P. 117]. Social pathology within this type of deviant behavior consists of sexual inversions (pedophilia, geronthophilia, necrophilia and zoophilia) and sexual perversions (sadism, masohism, exibitionism, fetishism, transvestism and voyerism) [4], though the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders by the American Psychiatric Association (2000) distinguishes paraphilias and sexual dysfunctions. The survey aimed to find out whether the respondents were familiar with the notions referring to some sorts of paraphilia such as exhibitionism, voyeurism, fetishism, phone scatology, necrophilia, mammophilia, zoophilia, gerontology, and cleptophilia.

Thus, the types of paraphilia Exhibitionism refers to the exposition of one's body, especially private parts, with the purpose of attracting sexually and achieving sexual arousal; voyeurism -- the attempt to sexually arouse while watching unknown person or a person who is undressing while unaware of being watched; fetishism -- the situation when the erotic enjoyment is found in an inanimate object (fetish) or some other part of other's body; phone scatology -- behavior that occurred in the era of electronic communication and is manifested in the satisfaction of sexual needs in harassment of unknown people through indecent phone calls; necrophilia refers to the sexual arousal in a contact with the dead and the inclusion in sexual activities with corpses; mammophilia refers to the sexual appeal to female breasts; zoophilia -- sexual satisfaction achieved through copulation with animals; gerontophilia refers to sexual attraction to elder people; cleptophilia -- sexual arousal found in stealing; infantophilia refers to sexual attraction to infants at the age of five or younger [11]. the respondents are familiar with include exibitionism (68,6%), voyeurism (60,5%), fetishism (69,5%), and necrophilia (51,4%); while other types of paraphilia mentioned in the questionnaire were rather unknown for most respondents especially phone scatology, necrophilia, mammophilia, gerontology, and infantophilia (Table 3).

Table 3 Understanding the meanings of the terms related to certain types of perihelia

Type

Yes

No

I do not know

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Exhibitionism

151

68,6

35

15,9

32

14,5

Voyeurism

133

60,5

50

22,7

36

16,4

Fetishism

153

69,5

36

16,4

30

13,6

Telephone Scatology

52

23,6

114

51,4

52

23,6

Necrophilia

113

51,4

72

32,7

33

15

Mammophilia

71

32,3

101

45,9

45

20,5

Zoophilia

119

54,1

60

27,3

39

17,7

Gerontophilia

67

30,5

101

45,9

50

22,7

Cleptophilia

123

55,9

59

26,8

35

15,9

Infantophilia

52

23,6

110

50

56

25,5

All the above mentioned types of paraphilia are characterized with aggression, while some of them, like fetishism, imply criminal activities and consequences (“acrotomophilia -- a strong sexual interest in amputees; asphyxiophilia -- sexual arousal by oxygen deprivation”, and so on) [4. P. 213]. There is an interdependence between the way a society treats deviant behavior and the social perception of it. The public opinion on paraphilias of now well-known and frequent types relies on personal experience and judgment or on “jibbing, mocking, and isolation” [15]. In general society prefers to apply violence as a kind of problem solving in such cases for “aggression is a social reaction to the interests, attitudes, aims or values of certain individuals, social groups or societies that are tried to be forcefully changed” [15. P. 224].

From the sociological perspective, there are several interpretations of aggression: positivism, functionalism and Marxism, and several typologies of this deviation such as collective and individual aggression. According to Milosavljevic [15], collective aggressions usually occur on the macro-level, i.e. on the level of global societies, social classes or large groups, while individual aggressions occur on the micro-level in the form of conflicts between individuals and small groups. Every type of aggression has certain social consequences, but this paper focuses on the microlevel -- conflicts in families and domestic violence. Psychology prefers the term `family climate', or emotional climate, manifested in family expressiveness (emotional exchange, how family members exchange emotions and communicate on the emotional level), family cohesion (whether or not family members are devoted to each another and the family as a whole), and conflicts (expressions of aggression and anger) [14].

Table 4 presents the distribution of conflicts in the respondents' families. In most cases, these are fights between parents and their children (43,6%) and spouses (40%).

Table 4 Fights in the family

Between spouses

Between parents and children

Between parents and their parents

No answer

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

88

40

96

43,6

16

7,3

20

9,1

Table 5 presents the quality of relations between family members, i.e. sorts of emotional communication that refer to aggression: 15% said that their family members sometimes hit one another; when someone complains about something, 42,3% of family members get upset; in 20,9% of families members often argue.

Table 5 Relationship in families

Modes of family expressiveness and emotional communication

Yes

No

No answer

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Family members help each other

200

90,9

12

5,5

8

3,6

Family members restrain feelings

90

40,9

122

55,5

8

3,6

We say all we want at home

167

75,9

43

19,5

10

4,5

We are angry and we throw things during quarrels

44

20

167

75,9

9

4,1

Family members often criticize each another

103

46,8

108

49,1

9

4,1

Family members sometimes hit another

33

15

179

81,4

8

3,6

When we disagree, we try to stay calm

176

80

36

16,4

8

3,6

We believe that shouting is not an option

154

70

58

26,4

8

3,6

Family members support each another

192

87,3

20

9,1

8

3,6

If you complain, someone gets upset

93

42,3

119

54,1

8

3,6

There is a feeling of togetherness in the family

190

86,4

22

10

8

3,6

Family members almost never lose temper

96

44,5

114

51,8

8

3,6

We argue a lot

46

20,9

166

55,5

8

3,6

Table 6 shows the share of respondents being a victim of some types of violence. Usually this is psychological harassment (23,3%), less often -- physical violence (14,4%), economic and cyber violence.

Table 6 Types of domestic violence and their scale

Types

Never

Sometimes

Frequently

Very frequently

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Physical abuse

180

81,8

31

14,4

6

2,7

0

0

Sexual harassment

215

97,7

1

0,5

1

0,5

0

0

Psychological harassment

161

73,2

51

23,2

4

1,8

1

0,5

Economic violence

187

85

23

10,5

6

2,7

0

0

Cyber violence

202

91,8

10

4,5

4

1,8

1

0,5

The correlation between the phenomena under study was also estimated (Table 7). The results show that there is a statistically significant correlation between family fights and physical abuse (Pearson's coefficient of positive correlation r = 0,336). Thus, the hypothesis that the families, in which members often fight, are prone to physical abuse (it implies the use of physical force or objects that cause pain, injury, and endanger health or life; in most cases it is manifested in hitting with hands, tearing hair, twisting body parts or face, hitting with different objects, deprivation of food, clothes or shoes, exposure to harsh climate conditions, and so on [15]) was confirmed.

Table 7 Correlation between family fights and some other types of violence

Types of violence

r

p

Physical abuse

0,336

0,000

Psychological harassment

0,297

0,000

Economic violence

0,267

0,000

The same applies to other types of violence -- both psychological and economic. Psychological violence threatens psychological integrity and health (humiliation, insults, verbal abuse, threats, ignorance, various restrictions on freedom), and is the most frequent type of domestic violence usually not implying physical abuse [1. P. 19]. However, there are many threats of physical abuse such as beating, breaking bones and a nose, smashing the teeth, pulling one's hair and setting it afire. Women are very often threatened by sexual abuse, while children are often manipulated. “Psychological harassment should be defined as spiritual but at the same time it implied destruction of cultural and religious beliefs, mocking, humiliation, ban to practice one's rituals, or coercion to acquire another value system” [1. P. 19]. According to Table 7, there is a correlation between “we argue a lot in the family” and being a victim of psychological harassment (positive coefficient of correlation r = 0,297).

Economic violence refers to the control of economic resources and denial to provide such to satisfy women's needs, usually this is a denial to give women an opportunity to earn money. The victims of economic violence are given limited access to money in the household, deprived of personal needs and not able to have their own money, because other family member(s), who earn money, spend it on their own needs and leave the household without financial support [1. P. 18]. According to Table 7, there is a statistically significant correlation between family fights and economic violence (Pearson's coefficient of positive correlation r = 0,267). Thus, the hypothesis that the families, in which members often fight, are prone to economic violence was confirmed.

Table 8 revelas possible factors of violence agains women (according to the UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women signed in 1993, violence against women is defined as every act of gender based violence that leads, or can lead to physical, psychic, sexual injury or suffering of the woman, including the threat to do so as such act, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, regardles if it takes place in public or private life). These factors include specific features of the family, economic possibilities, position in society, and some social-cultural factors. Alcohol addiction, drugs and gambling are the most evident possible factors of violence agains women.

The respondents believe that alcohol addiction of the partner in 84,5% cases can lead to violence, drug addicion -- in 85,9% cases, and gambling -- in 75% cases; and distrust -- in 80% cases.

Alcoholism is in fact a sociopath logical problem that should be considered rather family than individual issue [4. P. 96]. Families of alcohol addicts encounter a series of problems that “affect the functionality of the family, change the quality of communication and emotional relations, threaten the psychological health of children and other family members” [7. P. 80]. Alcohol addicts' families are disfunctional in terms of relationships, which leads to social isolation, break of social contacts with family friends, aggression and disorder in family structure [4. P. 96]. Communictaion problems in such families prevent exchange of information for making important decisions, and the wives of alcoholics suffer anxious and depressive dissorders, are socialy isolated, think about suicide and try to commit it [7. P. 81]. Drugs determine violence against women for some drugs can temporarily provoke physical violence, and abstinential periods imply aggressive outbursts. The relationship of drugs and violence form three types of deviant behavior: systematic, economic-compulsive and psychopharmacological [4. P. 145]. The problems families face when one of the partners is a drug addict are similar to the families of alcoholics: disorder in social relations, inability to adapt in family relations, and tendency to isolationism. Such families are like an isolated island for the communication between family members is weakened, the education of children is neglected, and traditional moral values are ignored [6. P. 19]. Gambling addiction of a partner can also lead to violence because the main feature of gambling is that the game fiction becomes reality [15. P. 218]. The main goal of gambling is acquisition of material goods accompanied with a certain dose ofjoy; gambling as a form of behavior means that the person is ready to loose rather than to win, which makes the gamlers's family gambling victims.

Table 8 Potential factors of violence against women

Factors

Yes

No

No answer

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Spatial position of the household

42

19,1

160

71,7

18

8,2

Economical position of the woman

105

47,7

100

45,5

15

6,8

Material deprivation

113

51,4

36

16,4

16

7,3

Frequent disagreements

173

53,2

36

16,4

11

5

Low education

118

53,6

88

40

14

6,4

Partiarhical family

117

53,2

86

39,1

17

7,7

Former experience in marriage

86

39,1

120

54,5

14

6,4

Distrust

177

80,5

33

15

10

4,5

Alcohol addiction

186

84,5

26

11,8

8

3,6

Drug addiction

189

85,9

24

10,9

7

3,2

Gambling

165

75

42

19,1

13

5,9

Participation in the wars in the 1990s

104

47,3

99

45

17

7,7

Children's behavior

80

36,4

125

56,8

15

6,8

Disability of the woman

45

20,5

158

71,8

17

7,7

Illness of the woman

45

20,5

158

71,8

17

7,7

Distribution of housework

40

18,2

163

74,1

17

7,7

According to Milosavljevic [15], violence, physical injuries, even murders are often determined by family and gender relations because there are no mechanisms to resolve conflicts in such small social groups in close spatial and emotional contact. The research conducted in 2013 by the Agency for Gender Equality of B&H and gender centers of its subjects in cooperation with statistical institutions and with the support of UNFPA and UN WOMEN (the representative sample consisted of 3300 women aged 18 and over) showed that 42,7% of women were victims of violence since they were 15 years old, and 52,8% did not report any forms of violence; in 2013, 37,9% of women were abused by partners, 14,1% -- by other relatives and household members, and 15,3% -- by partners, family, and community.

Society has always been interested in sociopathological problems, and men have always tried to suppress `other' forms of behavior differing from a socially acceptable model. In ancient times, Platon advocated the principle of individualization trying to reveal and explain factors of certain crimes; Aristotle, on the contrary, emphasized social- cultural factors, while the representatives of Roman antiquity, Cicero and Seneca, underlined the purposefulness to punish the offenders. In the Dark Ages, the religion was absolutely dominant, and all good and bad actions were interpreted through ecclesiastical canons. The Age of Enlighment developed a more flexible approach to punishing deviant forms of behavior, for instance, Hobbes and Lock justified the purposefulness of punishments to ensure social peace. Positivism in social sciences first focused on social factors as key determinants of crime behavior. Representatives of other theories of positivism, such as Lombroso, believed in biological factors as determinants of crimes and some other deviations [4].

All approaches to the study of sociopathological problems admitted the importance of social and cultural enviroment for shaping individual and group behavior through socialization. Cultural isolation, deprivation, and subgroup values negatively affect individuals leading to socially unacceptable behaviors [8]. The consequences of unsuccessful! socialization are numerous and manifested in both private and social life as conflicts, disorganised families, commitment subcultural lifestyle. Social enviroment, education, science and culture are key means to develop individual and group social values and understanding of disturbing factors in social realty [4. P. 25], i.e. sociopath logical problems can be the results of these elements' disfunctionality or of unsuccessful socialization. We are are not biopsychological creatures or isolated individuals, but a unit in interaction with other people, traditions, beliefs, values and moral norms that form the unconscious basis of our everyday life. Society is not an imaginary term for numerous deviant forms of behavior exist within it both determined by and affecting social enviroment.

The results of the research, or the indicators studied in the survey, point to structural social problems and identity crisis. Although the Republic of Srpska have some specific formal-legal features, social enviroment, education, science and culture are still basic elements that determine the dominant values of the society and the perception of disturbing factors in it. The results of the survey show that the society in general is aware of the meaning of most terms referring to paraphilia, but a kind of unawareness about less known forms of paraphilia does not mean that all these forms of deviant behavior are to be prevented on the institutional level -- through education and legal sanctions. However, aggression seems to be a more preferable solution for the society tends to suppress forcibly interests, opinions, goals, values, and actions that are not traditional or socially acceptable by the majority.

In general, aggression is ubiquitous on the micro-level, conflicts and disagreements are determined by differences in personal motives, needs, interests, freedom and rights. Fights are typical for parents and children, between spouses and between parents and their parents, and there is a statistically significant connection between frequent family fights and phisycal violence. Alcohol addiction, drugs and gambling are most evident factors of violence against women. There is an acute need in the sociological study of violence and other sociopathological problems for most of them stay hidden in the private life and do not become public due to the suppressive social traditions that still prevail in many societies.

References

[1] Aleksic J., Djorgovic J. Prirucnik za medijsko izvjestavanje o nasilju uporodici i nasilju nad zenama [Handbook for the Media Coverage of Domestic Violence and Violence Against Women], Beograd: Uprava za rodnu ravnopravnost, Ministarstvo rada i socijalne zastite; 2011 (In Serbian).

[2] Bandura A. Teorija socijalnog ucenja [Social Learning Theory]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1977 (In Serbian).

[3] Bandura A., Ross D., Ross S.A. Prenos agresije putem imitacije agresivnih modela [Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models]. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961: 63: 575--582 (In Serbian).

[4] Boskovic M. Socijalna patologija [Social Pathology]. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet; 2007 (In Serbian).

[5] Brankovic S. Metodologija drustvenih istrazivanja [Social Research Methodology]. Beograd: Zavod za udzbenike; 2014 (In Serbian).

[6] Bukelic J. Droga u skolskoj klupi [Drugs in School Desk]. Beograd: Velarta; 2002 (In Serbian).

[7] Dragisic-Labas SAlkoholizam u porodici i porodica u alkoholizmu [Alcoholism in the Family, and Families in Alcoholism], Beograd: Cigoja; 2012 (In Serbian).

[8] Dunn Jay I. Social and community psychiatry and individual social consciousness. Journal of Analytical Psychology. 1968: 13 (2): 146--154.

[9] Jakovljevic V. Socijalna patologija [Social Pathology]. Beograd: Naucna knjiga; 1971 (In Serbian).

[10] Jugovic A. Teorija drustvene devijantnosti [Theory of Social Deviance]. Beograd: Partenon; 2013 (In Serbian).

[11] Kron L.J. Parafilije: definicija, etiologija, tipovi, klinicki tretman i prognoze [Paraphilias: definition, etiology, types, clinical treatment and prognosis], Zbornik Instituta za kriminoloska i socioloska istrazivanja. 2009: XXVIII (1--2): 117--127 (In Serbian).

[12] Ljubicic M. Porodica i delinkvencija [Family and Delinquency]. Beograd: Cigoja; 2011 (In Serbian).

[13] Merton R.K., Nisbet RA. Contemporary Social Problems, New York: Hartcourt Brace; 1971.

[14] Mihic I., Zotovic M., Jerkovic I. Struktura i socijalno-demografska obiljezja obiteljskog okruzenja u Vojvodini [Structure and social-demographic characteristics of the family environment in Vojvodina]. Psihologija, 2009: 39 (2): 297--312 (In Serbian).

[15] Milosavljevic M. Devijacije i drustvo [Deviations and Society]. Beograd: Draganic; 2003 (In Serbian).

[16] Rock P. Deviant Behaviour. London: Hutchinson University Library; 1973.

[17] Study of the Violence against Women in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

  • Studies by Fischer and his colleagues and Dawson (2006) have investigated development in a wide range of domains, including understanding of social interaction concepts such as "nice" and "mean", skills in mathematics, and understanding "leadership".

    реферат [20,2 K], добавлен 22.12.2009

  • Research of negative influence of computer games with the elements of violence and aggression on psychical development of children and teenagers. Reasons of choice of computer games young people in place of walk and intercourse in the real society.

    доклад [15,3 K], добавлен 10.06.2014

  • The definition of stress as the body's way of responding to any kind of stimuli. Consideration of positive and negative emotions, which may cause stress. External and internal causes of stress. The role of consciousness in the assessment of events.

    презентация [1,1 M], добавлен 22.09.2015

  • Unhealthy food, lack of sleep, passive lifestyle, related works. Survey, Passive Lifestyle, Lack Of Sleep, Nutrition. How often pupils have negative feelings. Teachers' complaints. Can we do to reduce these negative displays of pupil’s behavior.

    курсовая работа [25,5 K], добавлен 18.05.2015

  • Definition of Leadership. Trait theory. How this theory works. Origin and Analysis and basics Pre-conditions for effective use of Trait theory. Inborn leadership characteristics. Process of impact and interaction among the leader and his followers.

    реферат [436,9 K], добавлен 24.09.2014

  • The study of harm to children from watching American cartoons. Problem of imitating negative or mindless characters from cartoons. Leading role of American cartoon industry in the animation history. First steps in the progress of a child’s development.

    эссе [16,3 K], добавлен 11.04.2013

  • Influence psychology of cognitive activity and cognitive development on student’s learning abilities during study. Cognitive development theory in psychology. Analysis of Jean Piaget's theory. Her place among the other concept of personal development.

    презентация [1,3 M], добавлен 13.04.2016

  • The definition of conformism as passive acceptance and adaptation to standards of personal conduct, rules and regulations of the cult of absolute power. Study the phenomenon of group pressure. External and internal views of subordination to the group.

    реферат [15,3 K], добавлен 14.05.2011

  • What is conflict. As there is a conflict. Main components of the conflict. The conflict is a dispute over what. How to resolve the conflict. Negotiations search consent of a compromise. Subject of the dispute. The decision brought. Suppressed discontent.

    презентация [50,7 K], добавлен 21.03.2014

  • Social structure as one of the main regulators of social dynamic. The structure of the social system: social communities, social institutions, social groups, social organizations. The structure of social space. The subsystem of society by T. Parsons.

    презентация [548,2 K], добавлен 06.02.2014

  • Understanding of social stratification and social inequality. Scientific conceptions of stratification of the society. An aggregated socio-economic status. Stratification and types of stratification profile. Social stratification of modern society.

    реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 05.01.2009

  • What is social structure of the society? The concept of social structure was pioneered by G. Simmel. The main attributes of social structure. Social groupings and communities. Social status. Structural elements of the society’s fundamental institutions.

    реферат [25,4 K], добавлен 05.01.2009

  • The need for human society in the social security. Guarantee of social security in old age, in case of an illness full or partial disability, loss of the supporter, and also in other cases provided by the law. Role of social provision in social work.

    презентация [824,4 K], добавлен 16.10.2013

  • The concept, definition, typology, characteristics of social institute. The functions of social institution: overt and latent. The main institution of society: structural elements. Social institutions of policy, economy, science and education, religion.

    курсовая работа [22,2 K], добавлен 21.04.2014

  • The necessity of using innovative social technologies and exploring the concept of social entrepreneurship. Analyzes current level of development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine, the existing problems of creating favorable organizational.

    статья [54,5 K], добавлен 19.09.2017

  • Social interaction and social relation are identified as different concepts. There are three components so that social interaction is realized. Levels of social interactions. Theories of social interaction. There are three levels of social interactions.

    реферат [16,8 K], добавлен 18.01.2009

  • The subjective aspects of social life. Social process – those activities, actions, operations that involve the interaction between people. Societal interaction – indirect interaction bearing on the level of community and society. Modern conflict theory.

    реферат [18,5 K], добавлен 18.01.2009

  • Negative consequences proceeding in real sector of economy. Social stratification in a society. Estimation of efficiency of economic safety. The parity of the manufacturers of commodity production. Main problems of the size of pension of common people.

    статья [15,4 K], добавлен 12.04.2012

  • The definition of Corporate Social Responsibility and main approaches. Stakeholder VS Shareholders. The principles of CSR: features and problems. Sanofi Group Company and its Social Responsibility program. Results and Perspectives, the global need.

    курсовая работа [43,2 K], добавлен 09.03.2015

  • Overview of social networks for citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Evaluation of these popular means of communication. Research design, interface friendliness of the major social networks. Defining features of social networking for business.

    реферат [1,1 M], добавлен 07.01.2016

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.