Стратегии онлайн-поиска информации как предмет психологического исследования: теоретическая модель

Crescenzi A. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in time-constrained in information search // Search as Learning. 2016. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_pa- per_5.pdf (дата обращения: 30.01.2020).

DavidP., SongM., Hayes A. F., Fredin E. S. A cyclic model of information seeking in hyperlinked environments: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation // International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2007. Vol. 65. P. 170-182. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.004

Drabenstott K. M. Web search strategy development // Online. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 18-27.

Eyesenbach G., Kцhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and indepth interviews // British Medical Journal. 2002. Vol. 324. P. 573-577. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573

Flavell J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive -- developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34. No. 10. P. 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Gagniure L., BetrancourtM., Dйtienne F. When metacognitive prompts help information search in collaborative setting // European Review of Applied Psychology. 2012. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 73-81. DOI: 10.1016/ j.erap.2011.12.005

Gerjets P., Kammerer Y., Werner B. Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data // Learning and Instruction. 2011. Vol. 21. P. 220-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.005

Graesser A. C., Wiley J., Goldman S. R., O'Reilly T., Jeon M., McDaniel B. SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption // Metacognition and Learning. 2007. Vol. 2. No. 2-3. P. 89-105. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-007-9013-x

Guinee K., Eagleton M. B., Hall T. E. Adolescents' internet search strategies: Drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources // Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2003. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 363-374. DOI: 10.2190/HD0A-N15L-RTFH-2DU8

Head A., Eisenberg M. How college students use the web to conduct everyday life research // First Monday. 2011. Vol. 16. No. 4. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2281533 (дата обращения: 03.02.2020).

Heinstrom J. Fast surfers, broad scanners, deep divers. Personality and information-seeking behaviour. Doctoral dissertation. Turku: Ebo Academi University Press, 2002. 284 р.

Hofer B. K. Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive Process: Thinking aloud during online searching // Educational Psychologist. 2004. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 43-55. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5

Hцlscher C., Strube G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies // Computer Networks. 2000. Vol. 33. P. 337-346. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00031-1

Huertas-Bustos A., Lypez-Vargas O., Sanabria-Rodriguez L. Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on information web search // Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 91-106.

Kammerer Y., Amann D. G., Gerjets P. When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. Vol. 48. P. 297-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.045

Kirkpatrick L. C., Klein P. D. High-achieving high school students' strategies for writing from Internet- based sources of information // Journal of Writing Research. 2016. Vol. 8. P. 1-47. DOI: 10.17239/jowr- 2016.08.01.01

Kitajima M., Blackmon M. H., Polson P. G. A comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to web usability analysis // People and computers XIV -- usability or else! / ed. by S. McDonald, Y. Waern, G. Cockton. London: Springer-Verlag, 2000. P. 357-373.

Knight S., Rienties B., Littleton K., Mitsui M., Tempelaar D. T., Shah C. The relationship of (perceived) epistemic cognition to interaction with resources on the internet // Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. Vol. 73. P. 507-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.014

Kuhkthau C. C. Accommodating the user's information search process: Challenges for information retrieval system designers // Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 1999. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 12-16. DOI: 10.1002/bult.115

Kuo F. R., Chen N. S., Hwang G. J. A creative thinking approach to enhancing the web-based problem solving performance of university students // Computers & Education. 2014. Vol. 72. P. 220-230. DOI:10.1016/ j.compedu.2013.11.005

Li Y., Yu C., JinghongL., Yuan C., Xuan W., Ping C., Qianqian W. Measuring task complexity in information search from user's perspective // Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 1-8.

Lu W., Jia Y. An eye-tracking study of user behavior in web image search // PRICAI 2014: Trends in artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science / ed. by D. N. Pham, S. B. Park. Vol. 8862. Cham: Springer, 2014. P. 170-182. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_14

Marchionini G. Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 236 p. DOI: 10.2307/40324289

Monchaux S., Amadieu F., Chevalier A., Marine C. Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved. Information // Processing and Management. 2015. Vol. 51. P. 557-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.004

Navarro-Prieto R., Scaife M., Rogers Y. Cognitive strategies in web searching // Proceedings of the 5th Conference on human factors and the web gaithersburg. Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999. P. 43-56.

Pfaffenberger B. Web search strategies. New York: MIS Press, 1996. 456 p.

Pirolli P., Card S. K. Information foraging // Psychological Review. 1999. Vol. 106. P. 643-675.

PressleyM., Harris K. R. Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction // Handbook of educational psychology / ed. by P. A. Alexander, P. Winne. New York: MacMillan, 2006. P. 265-286.

Purcell K., Brenner J., Raine L. Search engine use 2012. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://pewinter- net.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PI P_Search_Engine_Use_2012.pdf (дата обращения: 25.05.2020).

Qu P., Liu C., Lai M. The effect of task type and topic familiarity on information search behaviors // IIiX `10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. P. 371-376. DOI: 10.1145/1840784.1840841

Roscoe R. D., Grebitus C., O'Brian J., Johnson A. C., Kula I. Online information search and decision making: Effects of web search stance // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 56. P. 103-118. DOI: 10.1016/ j.chb.2015.11.028

Scott T. J., O'Sullivan M. K. Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum // Teacher Librarian. 2005. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 21-25.

Sharit J., Taya J., Berkowsky R., Czaja S. Online information search performance and search strategies in a health problem-solving scenario // Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 211-228. D0I: 10.1177/1555343415583747

Singer G., Danilov D., Norbisrath U. Complex search: Aggregation, Discovery, and Synthesis // Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 2012. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 89-106. DOI: 10.3176/proc.2012.2.02

Singer G., Norbisrath U., Lewandowski D. Ordinary search engine users carrying out complex search tasks // Journal of Information Science. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 346-358. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512466974

Spool J. M., Scanlon T., Schroeder W., Snyder C., DeAngelo T. Web site usability: A designer's guide. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999. 176 p.

Sun C., Ye S., Hsieh H. Effects of student characteristics and question design on Internet search results usage in a Taiwanese classroom // Computers and Education. 2014. Vol. 77. P. 134-144.

Sьnkler S., Lewandowski D. Does it matter which search engine is used? A user study using post-task relevance judgments // Proceedings of the 80th Annual meeting of the association of information science and technology. Crystal City: Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017. P. 405-414. DOI: 10.1002/ pr a2.2017.14505401044

TsaiM.-J., Tsai C.-C. Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy // Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2003. Vol. 40. P. 43-50. DOI: 10.1080/13 55800032000038822Tseng J., Tjondronegoro D., Spink A. Analysing web multimedia query reformulation behaviour // Proceedings of the 14th Australasian document computing symposium / ed. by J. Kay, P. Thomas, A. Trotman. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2009. P. 1-8.

Voiskounsky A. E. The Internet as a space of knowledge: psychological aspects of hypertext structures // Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 7-20. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2017060401

Walhout J., Oomen P., JarodzkaH., Brand-Gruwel S. Effects of task complexity on online search behavior of adolescents // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 68. P. 14491461. DOI:10.1002/asi.23782

Walraven A., Brand-Gruwel S., Boshuizen H. Fostering students' evaluation behaviour while searching the internet // Instructional Science. 2013. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 125-146. DOI:10.1007/s11251-012-9221-x

Westerwick A. Effects of sponsorship, web site design, and Google ranking on the credibility of online information // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2013. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 80-97. DOI: 10.1111/ jcc4.12006

Wickens C. D., Lee J. D., Liu Y., Becker S. E. An introduction to human factors engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004. 608 p.

Wildemuth B. M., Freund L., Toms E. Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies // Journal of Documentation. 2014. Vol. 70. P. 1118-1140. DOI: 10.1108/JD-03-2014-0056

Wilson T. D. Information seeking behaviour and the digital information world // European Science Editing. 2004. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 77-81.

Wu Y.-T., Tsai C.-C. Information commitments: Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 374-385. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00144.x

Zhou M. A systematic understanding of successful web searches in information-based tasks // Educational Technology & Society. 2013. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 321-331.

Zhou M., Lam K. Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in K-12 and higher education settings: A systematic review // Education Tech Research. 2019. Vol. 67. P. 1353-1384. DOI: 10.1007/s11423- 019-09646-7

Zion M., Adler I., Mevarech Z. The effect of individual and social metacognitive support on students' metacognitive performances in an online discussion // Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2015. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 50-87. DOI: 10.1177/0735633114568855Размещено на Allbest.ru