Psychological characteristics of representatives of "person - technics" group of professions as a factor of job satisfaction and efficacy

The connection between the individual psychological characteristics of the representatives of the group of professions "man-technician" and their effectiveness in the example of repair mechanics is analyzed. Characteristics of the job satisfaction.

Рубрика Психология
Вид статья
Язык английский
Дата добавления 28.12.2021
Размер файла 33,1 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Psychological characteristics of representatives of “person - technics” group of professions as a factor of job satisfaction and efficacy

S. Motsna, O. Bayer

Анотація

Проаналізовано, теоретично обґрунтовано та емпірично перевірено зв'язок індивідуально-психологічних характеристик представників групи професій «людина-техніка» та їх ефективністю і задоволеністю роботою на прикладі слюсарів з ремонту та експлуатації газового устаткування. На вибірці, що складалась із сорока слюсарів-ремонтників газового устаткування та чотирьох їх безпосередніх керівників була емпірично встановлена наявність зв'язку між оцінкою ефективності праці й задоволеністю роботою та високим рівнем технічних здібностей, логіко-математичним, візуально-просторовим інтелектом та толерантністю до невизначеності.

Ключові слова: індивідуально-психологічнимі характеристики, задоволеність роботою, ефективність, представники групи професій «людина-техніка».

Аннотация

Проанализированы особенности связи между оценкой эффективности и удовлетворенности работой представителей группы профессий «человек-техника» с их индивидуально-психологическими характеристиками на примере слесарей по ремонту и эксплуатации газового оборудования. Практическое применение результатов исследования заключается в их потенциальной ценности для менеджеров по персоналу и HR-отделов предприятий с целью поиска сотрудников, которые лучше подходят для такой группы профессий, а также с целью мотивации, повышения удовлетворенности и эффективности уже работающих специалистов.

Ключевые слова: индивидуально-психологические характеристики, удовлетворенность работой, оценка эффективности, представители группы профессий «человек-техника».

Introduction

Problem identification. The urgency of investigation of individual psychological characteristics of representatives of the “person - technics” group of professions as a factor of their job satisfaction and efficacy is grounded by the fact that current conditions of economy development demand the high level of the quality of training of competitive professionals who are to be successful in professional self-realization and career. Work efficacy of these employees considerably depend on their psychological characteristics. At the same time, the data concerning manifestation of personality features in the process professional development allow to predict and improve it.

The analysis of the latest research findings. The problematics devoted to job satisfaction and work efficacy in relation to individual psychological characteristics of professionals has been worked out in the works of many domestic and foreign scientists. Different aspects of this matter, in particular, were analyzed in the papers by L. P. Alekseeva, M. P. Vasylieva, E. A. Klimov, A. K. Markova, L. A. Petrovskaya, L. P. Pukhovskaya, S. А. Sysoeva, S. S. Vitvyts'ka, O. V. Voznyuk, A. A. Dubasenyuk, M. V. Levkivs'kyi, G. S. Selevko etc. The works of Ukrainian psychologists L. M. Dybkova, V. I. Svystun, D. M. Goldevs'ka, O. Y. Kovalenko, O. G. Romanovs'ky, M. R. Mruga, L. G. Kaydalova are devoted to research of professional competence of future specialists in different fields.

Work efficacy is viewed by many authors as a complex characteristics of professional activity expressed in its quantitative and qualitative indices and determined by a person's integral characteristics that makes it possible to achieve a fairly high socially meaningful result of work and its products (material or spiritual) that comply with the demand of the society. Work satisfaction, as considerable amount of research shows (Cordero et al., 1998; Desselle, 2007; Faragher et al., 2005; Judge et al., 2002; Kaap-Deeder et al., 2018; Lee & Wilbur, 1985), is an important component of social psychological climate in a company being also a base for development and realization of positive psychological atmosphere in the group as well as a result of stable positive relationship between employees. Job satisfaction is influenced by the ratio between the essence of desires, motives and particular efficacy in the professional activity. Cognitive abilities, emotional stability, adaptation mastery, labour practice of employees, perspectives for a worker to use all knowledge and skills that he possesses, coordination of demands with his abilities named as work congruency, and organizational justice are all considered individual and psychological features that have a certain impact on job satisfaction (Petty et al., 1984; Scarpello & Campbell, 1993; Schmidt, 2007; Scotter, 2000; Tietjen & Myers, 1998).

The objective of the present paper lies in determining the specifics of the connection of job satisfaction and efficacy with individual and psychological characteristics of representatives of the group of professions “person - technics” on the example of craftsmen responsible for repairing and maintenance of gas equipment.

Presentation of the subject matter of the research

Theoretical analysis of the sources of literature allows to state that there exist the following requirements to individual psychological characteristics of such employees concerning the matter of their efficacy in work: a fairly high level of general and technical intelligence, good attention, operational in particular; self-confidence, resilience, intention to work, purposefulness as personality characteristics; being active and resourceful in complicated situations, demanding for oneself and others as social behavioral characteristics (Klimov, 1996; Kokun, 2010; Kunda et al., 2002; Mansfield, 1996; Muzyka, 2008; Watson & Meiksins, 1991). The ability to organize and manage the work is meaningful.

Speaking about the work efficacy of representatives of technical professions, a lot of researchers highlight that both its objective and subjective indices are to be considered (Bender et al., 2018; Chung et al., 2015; Hilton et al., 2009; Pidbuts'ka, 2015; Scherbakova, 2015). So, we can conditionally single out two blocks of such indices. The first unites objective characteristics of work efficacy such as effectiveness, productivity, quality, and reliability; subjective indices such as psychological and personal (employees work activity and job satisfaction) belong to the second block. Work activity is manifested in such indices as work productivity, product quality etc. Job satisfaction is an index of a personal attitude of a subject to his work that is an important condition of employees' efficacy.

There can be distinguished two groups of factors that influence job satisfaction (Shadrikov, 2004). The first has an impact on organizational relationship, and these are hygienic factors, labour organization, the schedule of work, provision with privileges (Bureau et al., 2018). The second group is motives and it includes satisfaction of internal needs, in particular acknowledgement of job achievements, deep integration to the essence of labour activity, responsibility, and initiative. As individual psychological characteristics having some impact on job satisfaction cognitive abilities, work congruence, meaning the possibility to make use of all knowledge and skills, the correspondence of work requirements to abilities as well as emotional stability and adaptation mastery are viewed (Kobets, 2012; Kulwinder, 2011; Tabakova, 2006; Tatyanenko, 2011; Voilokova, 2007).

In our research we put the goal to specify in what way individual psychological characteristics of representatives of the group of professions “person - technics”, in particular high indices of technical and emotional intelligence as well as tolerance to ambiguity, are connected with job efficacy and satisfaction. Our expectations as for such a connection grounded on the statement according to which dominance of certain individual psychological characteristics of representatives of the group of professions “person - technics” influence specifics of their job satisfaction and efficacy in different ways.

According to our hypothesis, workers with high indices of technical and emotional intelligence and tolerance to ambiguity are also typical of high levels of job efficacy and satisfaction. psychological man technician profession

To test these hypotheses, we created a sample of research participants out of Regional Gas Company “Dniprogaz” of Dnipro city division, men aged from 30 and 45. Total number of respondent craftsmen engaged in repairing and maintenance of gas equipment completed 40 subjects. The research was carried out in group form. The respondents were informed about the aim of the research and received explanations as for instructions for all questionnaires. In order to increase reliability of results, the research was carried out anonymously, and the subjects were asked to indicate only their age, sex, and initials. To eliminate the subjectiveness factor in evaluation of own efficacy by the respondents, we additionally asked direct managers of these employees to participate as experts as the respondents views on themselves and their managers' opinions could differ.

To test hypotheses empirically, the following questionnaires were chosen: Job Satisfaction Survey by P. Spector, Job Involvement Questionnaire by N. Kanungo, the test created by the HR-manager of “Dniprogaz” M. A. Shevchenko (for evaluation of employees); the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension test, Multiple Intelligences Test by H. Gardner; “New Questionnaire of tolerance or intolerance to ambiguity” by T. V. Kornilova.

We carried out p-Spearman's correlational analysis and found relationship between the indices of individual psychological characteristics and specifics of job satisfaction and efficacy. The indices of total employee's efficacy and job satisfaction were used in the research. The index of “total efficacy” was calculated as the sum of the employee's own efficacy estimation and such estimation made by his or her direct manager. The index of “total satisfaction” was found as a sum of additives defined by “Job Satisfaction Survey”. The results of empirical data as the data of correlational analysis are given in Table 1.

Table 1 illustrates meaningful relationship between estimation of job efficacy and total job efficacy of respondents with their types of intelligences. The high level of technical abilities of professionals is connected with the high level of their total efficacy (p= .898 at p< .001) and job satisfaction (p= .925 at p< .001). We also found the relationship between the level of logical-mathematic intelligence according to Gardner's test and job satisfaction (p= .817 at p< .001) and job efficacy (p= .809 at p< .001). This is also typical of visual-spatial intelligence: the connection with job efficacy is p= .759 at p< .001 and with job satisfaction p= .798 at p< .001. These results show that the higher the level of technical abilities is, the more repondents are satisfied with their work as it corresponds to their abilities, and the higher their efficacy is estimated.

One can also note that professionals with the higher level of linguistic abilities are less satisfied with work (p= -.378 at p< .05) and are worse estimated in efficacy by their managers (p= -.452 at p< .01). Our results coincide with the views of V. Shadrikov (Shadrikov, 2004) as for the influence of a subject's individual characteristics on his work effectiveness and of E. Klimov as for the phenomenon of jobs division by abilities (Klimov, 1996.

This is vital to point out that there is straight correlation between the indices of intrapersonal intelligence and efficacy estimation made by managers (p= .557 at p< .001) and job satisfaction (p= -.563 at p< .001). We can hypothesize that respondents with the higher level of intrapersonal intelligence even in a very stressful situation demonstrate a higher abilitity to keep calm and solve problems that helps them do their production tasks better and is better estimated by their managers.

Table 1 The specifics of the relationship between types of intelligence and job satisfaction and efficacy of “person - technics” group of professions Representatives

The Bennett Test

Multiple Intelligences Test

Linguistic

Logical-Mathematic

Visual-Spatial

Music

Interpersonal

Intrapersonal

Kynesthetic

Total efficacy

898***

- .45**

809***

759***

- .17

.353*

.557***

.266*

Total satisfaction

925***

- .37*

817***

798***

- .17

.369*

.563***

.316*

* atp< .05; **p< .01; ***p< .001

Table 2 shows that as for the importance of developed technical abilities in the work of this type of professionals the views of managers coincide with those of employees themselves. We also found meaningful reverse correlations between the level of linguistic intelligence and parts of job efficacy. Moreover, both employees and their managers state there is a connection between the development of interpersonal intelligence of a technical specialist and his or her efficacy.

When looking at the results given in Table 3 one may see the relationship of the level of technical abilities according to Bennett test and logical-mathematic and visual-spatial intelligences by Gardner test with such parts of job satisfaction as salary, advancement in career, additional privileges, rewards, and the character of work.

This can be explained with the fact that such employees thanks to their features have additional advantages in further development in their profession, promotion, they more often get financial rewards and acknowledgement for wel done job, and the character of their work corresponds to their abilities. It is important to stress the presence of reverse correlations between the level of technical specialists' linguistic intelligence with satisfaction with the character of work and rewards depending on different factors (financial rewards to well done job, financial premium for winning professional competitions etc.). Such employees dislike their work as it is.

The next step of the analysis of our results was learning the relationship between respondents' job efficacy and job satisfaction with their tolerance to ambiguity.

Table 2 The specifics of relationship between parts of efficacy estimation of “person - technics” group of professions representatives and their types of intelligence

Efficacy estimation

The Bennett Mechanical Comprehension test

Multiple Intelligences Test

Linguistic

Logical-Mathematic

Visual-Spatial

Music

Interpersonal

Intrapersonal

Kynesthetic

Employee's estimation

Competence

.536***

- .039

.466**

.338*

.2

.185

.3*

.272

Responsibility for work quality

.304*

.2

.3*

.204

.117

.023

.146

.062

Discipline

.337*

- .029

.329*

.336*

.3*

.231

.486**

.001

Strive for selfperfection

.463**

- .093

517***

.343*

.028

.134

.464**

.39*

Orientation on customer

.291*

- .185

.219

.041

.095

.057

.266

- .177

Initiativeness

.607***

.012

.456**

444**

.063

.313*

.446**

.141

Manager's estimation

Competence

847***

- .338*

837***

.758***

- .135

.315*

.552***

.316*

Responsibility for work quality

72***

- 5***

.604***

.664***

- .161

.284

.507***

.207

Discipline

514***

- .16

573***

.66***

- .001

.072

.463**

.308*

Strive for selfperfection

.868***

- 5***

759***

.768***

- .184

.369*

.484**

.263

Orientation on customer

.607***

- 4**

.608***

.662***

- .226

.356*

.119

.127

Initiativeness

779***

- .305*

.636***

714***

.008

.361*

.509***

.186

* atp< .05; **p< .01; ***p< .001

Table 3 The specifics of the relationship between the types of intelligence and components of job satisfaction of specialists of technical group of professions

Components of job satisfaction

The Bennett Mechanical Comprehension test

Multiple Intelligences Test

Linguistic

Logical-Mathematic

Visual-Spatial

Music

Interpersonal

Intrpersonal

Kynesthetic

Salary

.515***

- .218

.442**

.403**

.154

.178

.493**

.085

Advancement in career

.623***

- .258

.548***

619***

.057

.273

.36*

524***

Management

.3*

.04

.186

42**

.197

.271

.228

.085

Additional privileges

814***

- .3*

.678***

.658***

- .227

.462**

.451**

.261

Rewards depending on different factors

.862***

- 41**

8***

738***

- .2

.323*

53***

.226

Working conditions

.103

.092

.302*

.203

- .18

.085

.351*

.131

Colleagues

.114

.085

.073

.093

- .005

.021

.463**

.219

Character of work

.882***

- .39*

788***

773***

- .146

.3*

.4

.372*

Information

.092

.383*

.063

.118

- .2

.11

.087

.022

* atp< .05; **p< .01; ***p< .001

Table 4 The specifics of the relationship of respondents' job efficacy and job satisfaction with tolerance to ambiguity

Tolerance to ambiguity

Intolerance

Interpersonal intolerance to ambiguity

Total efficacy

.516***

- .473**

- .315*

Total satisfaction

.427**

- .17

- .216

* at p< .05; **p< .01; ***p< .001

We can see from Table 4 that there is a direct relationship between indices of the level of tolerance to ambiguity and job satisfaction (p= .427 at p< .01) and job efficacy (p= .516 at p< .001). It means that for technical personnel the higher the level of their tolerance to ambiguity is, the more they are satisfied with their work and more efficient.

Table 5 illustrates the relationship of tolerance to ambiguity with estimation and self-estimation of efficacy of technical specialists. The higher tolerance to ambiguity is, the more efficient specialists estimate themselves and are estimated by their managers (p= .441 at p< .01 and p= .48 at p< .01).

Table 5 shows that there is reverse relationship between manager's evaluation of an employee's efficacy and his ambiguity tolerance (p=- .393 at p< .05) as well as responsibility for work quality (p=- .589 at p< .001). Thus, the higher specialists ambiguity tolerance is, the more they are satisfied with work and efficient. These data correspond to the views of O. S. Tchougounova as for the importance for technical specialists of strive for change, novelty, originality, giving priority to more complex tasks, possibility of independence and going beyond accepted limitations which stand for tolerance to ambiguity (Tchougounova, 1983).

Table 5 The specifics of the relationship of the components of efficacy estimation with ambiguity tolerance and types of intelligence of “person - technics” group of professions representatives

Tolerance to ambiguity

Intolerance

Interpersonal intolerance to ambiguity

Self-esteem

Competence

441**

- .14

- .048

Responsibility for work quality

.155

.141

.142

Discipline

.369*

.182

.047

Strive for self-perfection

.307*

.003

- .069

Orientation on customer

.015

.095

.03

Initiativeness

.169

- .078

- .236

Estimation by managers

Competence

48**

- .393*

- .283

Responsibility for work quality

573***

- .589***

- .216

Discipline

.484**

.004

.012

Strive for self-perfection

.502***

- .242

- .336*

Orientation on customer

.518***

- .098

- .236

Initiativeness

.421**

- .282

- .114

*atp<.05; **p< .01; ***p< .001

Table 5 shows that there is reverse relationship between manager's evaluation of an employee's efficacy and his ambiguity tolerance (p= -.393 at p< .05) as well as responsibility for work quality (p= -.589 at p< .001). Thus, the higher specialists ambiguity tolerance is, the more they are satisfied with work and efficient. These data correspond to the views of O. S. Tchougounova as for the importance for technical specialists of strive for change, novelty, originality, giving priority to more complex tasks, possibility of independence and going beyond accepted limitations which stand for tolerance to ambiguity (Tchougounova, 1983).

The following step was to learn possible relationship between repondents' job satisfaction and their tolerance to ambiguity. The results are given in Table 6.

Table 6 The specifics of the relationship between satisfaction with professional activity and respondents' tolerance to ambiguity

Tolerance to ambiguity

Intolerance

Interpersonal intolerance to ambiguity

Salary

.231

.065

- .155

Promotion

.286

.067

- .042

Management

.129

.147

.017

Additional rewards

.289

.129

- .29

Rewards not depending on different factors

.472**

- .359*

- .132

Work conditions

.244

- .109

.126

Colleagues

.018

- .026

.108

Character of work

.546***

- .23

- .298

Information

- .208

.369*

.013

Total satisfaction

.427**

- .17

- .216

We can see direct relationship between craftsmen's level of tolerance to ambiguity and their job satisfaction. So, the higher their tolerance to ambiguity is, the more they are satisfied with work (p= .427 at p< .001) especially with such its aspect as character of work (p= .546 at p< .001). There is a relationship between information as an aspect of job satisfaction and ambiguity tolerance (p= .369 at p< .001) that may indicate on the ability of emotionally stable employees to work under conditions of restricted access to information.

Conclusions

High level of general and technical intelligence, good attention, and operativeness refer to the set of individual psychological characteristics of a personality that are meaningfully related to the efficacy of professional activity of representatives of “person - technics” group of professions. As the result of our research we found a direct relationship between high levels of technical abilities, logical-mathematical and visual-spatial intelligences after H. Gardner and job efficiency and job satisfaction. So, the higher the specialists' level of technical abilities is, the more they are satisfied with work as it corresponds to their skillfulness.

Tolerance to ambiguity as a generalized personality characteristics is an important feature of representatives of “person - technics” group of professions. It stands for a subject's ability to be independent and get out of the limits of accepted limitations, to give priority to more complex tasks, and to be able to act under conditions of unforeseen circumstances. We found that the higher the level of specialists' ambiguity tolerance, the more they are satisfied with work and more efficient. We see the perspectives of further research is understanding the structure of technical specialists' motivation and constructing the system of their organizational (technical in particular) education.

References

1. Bender, S., Bloom, N., Card, D., Van Reenen, J. & Wolter, S. (2018), “Management practices, workforce selection, and productivity”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 36, No. S1, P. S371-S409.

2. Bureau, J. S., Mageau, G. A., Morin, A. J. S., Gagne, M., Forest, J., Papachristoulos, K., Lucas, A., Landry, A. T. & Parenteau, C. (2018), “Promoting autonomy to reduce employee deviance: The mediating role of identified motivation”, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 13, No. 5, P. 61-71.

3. Chung, J., Park, J., Cho, M., Park, Y., Kim, D., Yang, D. & Yang, Y. (2015), “A study on the relationships between age, work experience, cognition, and work ability in older employees working in heavy industry”, Journal of Physical Therapy Science, Vol. 27 No. 1, P. 155-157.

4. Cordero, R., Farris, G. F. & Tomaso, N. P. (1998), “Technical professionals in cross-functional team: their quality of work life”, Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, Issue 6, P. 550-563.

5. Desselle, S. P. (2007), “Structural model of certified pharmacy technicians' job satisfaction”, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol. 47 Issue 1, P. 58-72.

6. Faragher, E. B., Cass, M. & Cooper, C. L. (2005), “The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 62, Issue 2, P. 105-112.

7. Hilton, M. F., Staddon, Z., Sheridan, J. & Whiteford, H. A. (20), “The impact of mental health symptoms on heavy goods vehicle drivers' performance”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41 Issue 3, P. 453-461.

8. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002), “Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 3, P. 530-541. Kaap-Deeder, J., de Houwer, J., Hughes, S., Spruyt, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018), “The development and validation of an implicit measure of competence need satisfaction”, Motivation and Emotion, No. 42 (5), P. 615-637.

9. Klimov, E. A. (1996), Psychology of a professional employee [Psihologiya professionala], Publishing House “Izdatelstvo prakticheskoi psikhologii”, Moscow.

10. Kobets, V. M. (2012), “Students' satisfaction with their future profession as the emotional component of self-efficacy” [Zadovolenist' studentiv maybutnioyu profesiyeyu yak emotsiyna skladova samoefektyvnosti], Pedagohychni nauky: teoriya, istoriya,

11. innovatsiyni technologii - Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovational technologies, No. 8 (26), P. 261-267.

12. Kokun, O. M. (2010), “Theoretical and practical grounds of psychological provision of professional formation of a personality” [“Teoretychni ta praktychni zasady psykhologichnogo zabezpechennya profesiynoho stanovlennya osobystosti”], Materials of the 2nd All-Ukrnainian Psychological Congress devoted to the 110th anniversary of the birth of H. S. Kostyuk (April 19-21, 2010), Vol. 3, P. 167-171.

13. Kulwinder, S. (2011), “Study of achievement motivation in relation to academic achievement of students”, International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, No. 1 (2), P. 161-171.

14. Kunda, G., Barley, S. R. & Evans, J. (2002), “Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly-skilled technical professionals in a contingent labour market”, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, Vol. 55, Issue 2, P. 234-261.

15. Lee, R. & Wilbur, E. R. (1985), “Age, education, job tenure, salary, job characteristics, and job satisfaction: a multivariate analysis”, Human Relations, Vol. 38 No. 8, P. 781-791.

16. Mansfield, R. S. (1996), “Building competency models: approaches for HR professionals”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, P 7-18.

17. Muzyka, O. L. (2008), “Typological approach in psychology of abilities as an alternative to situational-dyspositional antymony” [“Typolohichnyi pidhid u psykhologii zdibnostei ta obdarovanosti yak alternatyva sytuatsiyniy-dyspozytsiyniy antynomii”], Aktual'ni problemy psykhologii: Problemy psykhologii tvorchosti: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' - Current issues of psychology: The problems of psychology of creativity: The collection of scientific papers, V. O. Molyako (Ed.), Vol. 12, Issue 4, P. C.184-192.

18. Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W. & Cavender, J. W. (1984), “A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance”, Academy of Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, P. 712-721.

19. Pidbuts'ka, N. V. (2015), “Characteristics and specifics of the value component of professionalism of a future engineer personality” [“Kharakterystyka i osoblyvosti tsinnisnoho komponenta profesionalizmu osobystosti maibunn'oho inzhenera”], Problemy suchasnoii psykhologii - The problems of the modern psychology, Issue 29, P. 498-508.

20. Ryff, C. (1995), “The structure of psychological well-being revisited”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, No. 69, P. 719-727.

21. Scarpello, V. & Campbell, J. P. (1993), “Job satisfaction and the fit between individual needs and organizational rewards”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 56 Issue 4, P 315-328.

22. Scherbakova, I. M. (2015), “Satisfaction with professional activity as an indicator of subjests of labour neurotisism” [“Zadovolenist' profesiynoyu dial'nistu yak indykator neirotyzmu subyektiv pratsi”], Pedagohychni nauky: teoriya, istoriya, innovatsiyni technologii - Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovational technologies, No. 1 (45), P. 186-192.

23. Schmidt, S. W. (2007), “The relationship between satisfaction with workplace training and overall job satisfasfaction”, Human Resource Development Quaterly, Vol. 18 Issue 4, P. 481-498.

24. Scotter, R. V. J. (2000), “Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 10 Issue 1, P. 79-95.

25. Shadrikov, V. P. (2004), “A new model of a specialist: innovation training and competency approach” [“Novaya model' spetsialista: innovatsionnaya podgotovka i komtepentnostnyi podhod”], Vysshee obrazovaniye segodnya - Higher education today, No. 8, P. 26-31.

26. Tabakova, I. A. (2006), “Adaptation and success in labour activity of representatives of the group of professions “person - technics” [“Adaptatsiya i uspekh v trudovoi deyatel'nosti predstavitelei gruppy professiy “chelovek - tekhnika”], Integratsiya metodicheskoi raboty i sistemy povysheniya kvalifkatsii kadrov - Integration of methodical work and the system ofincreasing employees' qualification, No. 2, P. 10-15.

27. Tatyanenko, S. A. (2011), “Professionally important personality qualities of modern representatives of the group of professions 'person - technics'” [“Professional'no vazhnyie kachestva lichnosti sovremennych predstavitelei gruppy professiy 'chelovek - technika'”], Lichnost' i obschestvo: Voprosy pedagogiki i psikhologii - Personality and society: issues of pedagogics and psychology, Collection of articles after the materials of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Part 2, P. 422.

28. Tchougounova, E. S. (1983), “Investigating social-psychological sets of employees of research and scientific institutes and construction bureaus with the purpose of professional prognoses” [“Izuchenie sotsial'no-psikhologicheskikh ustanovok sotrudnikov NII i KB s tsel'yu professional'nogo prognozirovaniya”], Sotsial'noye prognozirovanie v nauke - Social prognosing in science, P. 85-115.

29. Tietjen, M. A. & Myers, R. M. (1998), “Motivation and job satisfaction”, Management Desicion, Vol. 36 Issue 4, P. 226-231.

30. Voilokova, N. P. (2007), “Specifics of the motivation component of professionalism in “person - person” and “person - technics” professions'” [Osoblyvosti motyvatsiynoho komponentu profesionalizmu u profesiyakh typu “lyudyna - lyudyna” ta “lyudyna - tekhnika”], Visnyk Kharkivs'koho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriya Psychologiya - V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Bulletin. Psychology Series, Vol. 6, P. 15-18.

31. Watson, J. M. & Meiksins, P. F. (1991), “What do engineers want? Work values, job rewards, and job satisfaction”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 16 No. 2, P. 140-172.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

  • The problem of evaluation, self-assessment of personality as a psychological category. Factors of formation evaluation and self-esteem of children of primary school age. An experimental study of characteristics evaluation and self-esteem of junior pupils.

    курсовая работа [28,6 K], добавлен 19.05.2011

  • This article suggests specific ways in which college teachers can foster relationships with students that promote motivation and satisfaction. Fostering personal relationships with students. Motivating students to work. Handling interpersonal issues.

    статья [18,6 K], добавлен 10.05.2014

  • Theoretical basis of a role plays as a teaching aid. Historic background of game origin. Psychological value of a role plays. The main function and principles of game organization. Gaming technique. Classification of role plays. Advantages of a game.

    курсовая работа [50,7 K], добавлен 26.04.2013

  • The definition of conformism as passive acceptance and adaptation to standards of personal conduct, rules and regulations of the cult of absolute power. Study the phenomenon of group pressure. External and internal views of subordination to the group.

    реферат [15,3 K], добавлен 14.05.2011

  • Definition of Leadership. Trait theory. How this theory works. Origin and Analysis and basics Pre-conditions for effective use of Trait theory. Inborn leadership characteristics. Process of impact and interaction among the leader and his followers.

    реферат [436,9 K], добавлен 24.09.2014

  • Definition and general characteristics of the word-group. Study of classification and semantic properties of the data units of speech. Characteristics of motivated and unmotivated word-groups; as well as the characteristics of idiomatic phrases.

    реферат [49,3 K], добавлен 30.11.2015

  • The concept, essence, characteristics, principles of organization, types and features of the formation of groups of skilled workers. The general description of ten restrictions which disturb to disclosing of potential of group staff and its productivity.

    реферат [29,7 K], добавлен 26.07.2010

  • The most common difficulties in auding and speaking. Psychological characteristics of speech. Linguistic characteristics of speech. Prepared and unprepared speech. Mistakes and how to correct them. Speaking in teaching practice. Speech, oral exercises.

    курсовая работа [35,8 K], добавлен 01.04.2008

  • А complex comparison of morphological characteristics of English and Ukrainian verbs. Typological characteristics, classes and morphological categories of the English and Ukrainian verbs. The categories of person and number, tenses, aspect, voice, mood.

    дипломная работа [162,2 K], добавлен 05.07.2011

  • The connection of lexicology with other branches of linguistics. Modern Methods of Vocabulary Investigation. General characteristics of English vocabulary. The basic word-stock. Influence of Russian on the English vocabulary. Etymological doublets.

    курс лекций [44,9 K], добавлен 15.02.2013

  • Identifing demographic characteristics of consumers shopping in supermarkets. Determine the factors influencing consumer’s way of shopping and the level of their satisfaction (prices, quality, services offered, etc in supermarkets and bazaars).

    доклад [54,4 K], добавлен 05.05.2009

  • Features of English Nouns. The Category of Case. The Category of Number of English Nouns. Structural Semantic Characteristics of English, morphological, syntactical Characteristics of Nouns. The Use of Articles with Nouns in Some Set Expsessions.

    дипломная работа [96,9 K], добавлен 10.07.2009

  • Thematic review of the characteristics of each factor of production. The theories of main economists. The possible variants of new factors of production. Labor resources. "Elementary factors of the labour-process" or "productive forces" of Marx.

    реферат [437,4 K], добавлен 18.10.2014

  • Getting to know the sources of competitive advantage. Consideration of the characteristics of the implementation of the marketing strategy. Characteristics of branding forms: corporate, emotional, digital. Analysis of the online advertising functions.

    курсовая работа [66,3 K], добавлен 09.02.2016

  • Teaching practice is an important and exciting step in the study of language. Description of extracurricular activities. Feedback of extracurricular activity. Psychological characteristic of a group and a students. Evaluation and testing of students.

    отчет по практике [87,0 K], добавлен 20.02.2013

  • Expressive Means and Stylistic Devices. General Notes on Functional Styles of Language. SD based on the Interaction of the Primary and Secondary Logical Meaning. The differences, characteristics, similarities of these styles using some case studies.

    курсовая работа [28,8 K], добавлен 30.05.2016

  • Migration policies: The legal framework. The evolution of migration flows. Percentage of Portuguese emigration by district. Key migrant characteristics. Characteristics of legal migrants. Return migration. Portuguese emigration by destination, 1950-1988.

    реферат [65,6 K], добавлен 25.06.2010

  • Technical and economic characteristics of medical institutions. Development of an automation project. Justification of the methods of calculating cost-effectiveness. General information about health and organization safety. Providing electrical safety.

    дипломная работа [3,7 M], добавлен 14.05.2014

  • Short characteristic of creativity and literary activity of the most outstanding representatives of English literature of the twentieth century: H.G. Wells, G.B. Shaw, W.S. Maugham, J.R.R. Tolkien, A. Baron, A.A. Milne, P. Hamilton, Agatha Christie.

    реферат [31,4 K], добавлен 06.01.2013

  • Grammatical overview of English verbals. General characteristics of English verbals. General characteristics of Participles. Syntax and Semantics of English Verbals. The functions of the Infinitive in the sentence. Syntax and semantics of participles.

    дипломная работа [72,9 K], добавлен 10.07.2009

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.