Психологические характеристики деятельности, традиционные ценности и ценности безопасности вузовской молодежи в контексте инновативности

15. Мандрикова, Е. Ю. (2010). Разработка Опросника самоорганизации деятельности (ОСД). Психологическая диагностика, 2, 59-83.

16. Марцинковская, Т. Д. (2018). Психологические аспекты технологического общества. Психологические исследования, 11(62), 12. URL: http://http://psystudy.ru (дата обращения: 05.12.2021).

17. Маслоу, А. (2019). Мотивация и личность. СПб.: Питер.

18. Осин, Е. Н., Леонтьев, Д. А. (2020). Краткие русскоязычные шкалы диагностики субъективного благополучия: психометрические характеристики и сравнительный анализ. Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены, 1(155), 117-142. doi: org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06.

19. Пригожин, А. И. (2010). Цели и ценности. М.: Дело.

20. Рубинштейн, С. Л. (2008). Принцип творческой самодеятельности (К философским основам современной педагогики). В кн.: Д. В. Лубовский (сост.), Методологические основы психологии: Хрестоматия (с. 248-258). М.: АНО ПЭБ.

21. Салихова, Н. Р. (2010). Ценностно-смысловая организация жизненного пространства личности. Казань: Казанский университет.

22. Сугоняев, К. В. (2018). Исследование психометрических характеристик «Опросника ценностных портретов» Ш. Шварца в адаптации В. Карандашева и его доработка. В

23. С. Е. Таразевич (ред.), Актуальные проблемы эргономики, обитаемости и психологического сопровождения персонала объектов специального назначения: Материалы II межотраслевой научно-практической конференции (с. 186-198). Королев: ПСТМ.

24. Хабибулин, Р. К., Дейнека, О. С. (2015). Феномен постматериалистических ценностей и проблема политической стабильности. Современные проблемы науки и образования, 1-1, 1525. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25325271 (дата обращения: 05.12.2021).

25. Шварц, Ш., Бутенко, Т. П., Седова, Д. С., Липатова, А. С. (2012). Уточненная теория базовых ценностей: применение в России. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 9(1), 43-70.

References

1. Alishev, B.S. (2009). O psikhologicheskoy sushchnosti tsennostey [On the psychological essence of values]. In A. L. Zhuravlev, V. A. Barabanshchikov, & M. I. Volovikov (Eds.), Psikhologiya cheloveka v sovremennom mire [Human Psychology in the Modern World]. Vol. 1 (pp. 7-14). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS.

2. Anokhin, P.K. (1973). Printsipial'nye voprosy obshchey teorii funktsional'nykh sistem [Fundamental questions of the general theory of functional systems]. In P. K. Anokhin (Ed.), Printsipy sistemnoy organizatsii funktsiy [Principles of System Organization of Functions] (pp. 5-61). Moscow: Nauka.

3. Atamanova, I. V., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2018). Lichnostnaya gotovnost' sovremennoy vuzovskoy molodezhi k deyatel'nosti [Personal readiness of modern university youth for activity]. In Yu. P. Povarenkov (Ed.), Sistemogenez uchebnoy i professional'noy deyatel'nosti [Systemogenesis of Educational and Professional Activity] (pp. 134-137). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University.

4. Bogomaz, S. A., Klochko, V. E., Krasnoryadtseva, O. M., & Podoynitsina, M. A. (2018). Strategii samoosushchestvleniya u studencheskoy molodezhi [Strategies of selfrealization in students]. Voprosypsikhologii, 1, 49-58.

5. Bruce, R. A., & Scott, S. G. (2017). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 231242. doi: 10.5465/256701

6. Gofman, A. B. (2018) O traditsionnosti, legitimnosti i spravedlivosti. Sotsiologicheskie aspekty vzaimosvyazi [On traditionality, legitimacy and justice. Sociological aspects of relationship]. In M. K. Gorshkov (Ed.), Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Ezhegodnik [Reforming Russia. Yearbook]. Vol. 16 (pp. 34-54). Moscow: Novyy Khronograf.

7. Gordeeva, T. O., Sychev, O. A., & Osin, E. N. (2014). «Academic Motivation Scales» questionnaire. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal - Psychological Journal, 35(4), 96-107. (In Russian).

8. Guseltseva, M. S. (2017). Identichnost' v tranzitivnom obshchestve: transformatsiya tsennostey [Identity in a transitive society: The transformation of values]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya - Psychological Studies, 10(54), 5. doi: 10.54359/ps.v10i54.363

9. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

10. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Welzel, C., & Peterson, C. (2008). Social change, freedom and rising happiness: A global perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264-285.

11. Karandashev, V. N. (2004) Metodika Shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostey lichnosti: kon- tseptsiya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [The Schwartz methodology for studying personality values: The concept and methodological guidance]. St. Petersburg: Rech'.

12. Khabibulin, R. K., & Deyneka, O. S. (2015). Post-materialist values and concerns of political stability. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya - Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1(1), 15-25. (In Russian). Retrieved from: https://www.elib- rary.ru/item.asp?id=25325271 (Accessed: 5th December 2021).

13. Kislyakov, P. A., Shmeleva, E. A., Kovaleva, M. A., Savchenko, D. V., Belyakova, N. V., Denisenko, S. I., & Pchelinova, V. V. (2018). Health and safety in the structure of value orientations and needs of the student youth. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 10(8), 1976-1979.

14. Klochko, V. E., & Galazhinsky, E. V. (2009). Innovatsionnyy potentsial lichnosti: sistemno- antropologicheskiy kontekst [Innovative potential of a personality: System-

15. anthropological context]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta - Tomsk State University Journal, 325, 146-151.

16. Kolantaevskaya, A. A., Grishina, N. V., & Bazarov, T. Yu. (2016). Stylistic characteristics of self-determination in life changes situations. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 16. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika - Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology. Education, 4, 51-62. (In Russian). doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.404.

17. Lebedeva, N. M., & Tatarko, A. N. (2009). Metodika issledovaniya otnosheniya lichnosti k innovatsiyam [Methods of researching the individual's attitude to innovation]. Al'manakh sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya - Almanac of Modern Science and Education, 4(23), part 2, 89-96.

18. Lechiev, A.S. (2016). Bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti rossiyskogo sotsiuma kak tsennost' [Life safety of the Russian society as a value]. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya - Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 3, 336-341.

19. Leontiev, A. N. (2005). Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost' [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Smysl.

20. Leontiev, D. A., & Osin, E. N. (2014). «Good» and «bad» reflection: From an explanatory model to differential assessment. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki - Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(4), 110-135. (In Russian).

21. Levickaya, T. E., Trenkaeva, N. A., Kozlova, N. V., Bogomaz, S. A., & Cexmejstruk, E. A. (2018). Safety in the structure of values of young people living in an urban environment. Psikhologiya i pravo - Psychology and Law, 8(4), 20-33. (In Russian). doi: 10.1775 9/psylaw.2018080403

22. Mandrikova, E. Yu. (2010). Razrabotka Oprosnika samoorganizatsii deyatel'nosti (OSD) [Development of a Self-Organization of Activity Questionnaire (SOA)]. Psikholog- icheskaya diagnostika - Psychological Diagnostics, 2, 87-111.

23. Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2018). Psikhologicheskie aspekty tekhnologicheskogo obshchestva [Psychological aspects of a technological society]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya - Psychological Studies, 11(62), 12. doi: 10.54359/ps.v11i62.249

24. Maslow, A. (2019) Motivatsiya i lichnost' [Motivation and Personality] (T. Gutman, N. Mukhina, Trans.). St. Petersburg: Piter.

25. Osin, E. N., & Leontiev, D. A. (2020). Brief Russian-language instruments to measure subjective well-being: Psychometric properties and comparative analysis. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny - Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 117-142. (In Russian). doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06

26. Petrakis, P. E., Kostis, P. C., & Kafka, K. I. (2016). Secular stagnation, faltering innovation, and high uncertainty: New-era entrepreneurship appraisal using knowledge-based thinking. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1909-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.078

27. Prigozhin, A. I. (2010). Tseli i tsennosti [Goals and Values]. Moscow: Delo.

28. Puusa, A., Hokkila, K., & Leppanen, S. (2016). The appeal and correspondence of cooperative values and personal values of the youth. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 586-592). Retrieved from: https://search-proquest-com.ez.lib.tsu.ru/docview/1860088416?accountid=30388 (Accessed: 29th September 2020).

29. Rubinshtein, S. L. (2008). Printsip tvorcheskoy samodeyatel'nosti (K filosofskim osnovam sovremennoy pedagogiki) [The principle of creative amateur performance (To the philosophical foundations of modern pedagogy)]. In D. V. Lubovsky (Comp.) Metodologiches- kie osnovy psikhologii: Khrestomatiya [Methodological foundations of psychology: Anthology] (pp. 248-258). Moscow: ANO PEB.

30. Salikhova, N. R. (2010). Tsennostno-smyslovaya organizatsiya zhiznennogo prostranstva lichnosti [Value-semantic organization of a person's living space]. Kazan: Kazan State University.

31. Schwartz, S. H. (2012) An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116

32. Schwartz, S., Butenko, T. P., Sedova, D. S., & Lipatova, A. S. (2012). A Refined Theory of Basic Personal Values: Validation in Russia. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki - Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(2), 43-70. (In Russian).

33. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Torres, C., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Butenko, T. (2017). Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 241-258. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2228

34. Stock, R. M., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, N. L. (2016).Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Research Policy, 45(4), 757-769. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.002

35. Sugonyaev, K. V. (2018). Issledovanie psikhometricheskikh kharakteristik «Oprosnika tsen- nostnykh portretov» Sh. Shvartsa v adaptatsii V. Karandasheva i ego dorabotka [The psychometric characteristics of S. Schwartz's «Portrait Values Questionnaire» adapted by V. Karandashev and its revision]. In S. E. Tarazevich (Ed.), Aktual'nye problemy er- gonomiki, obitaemosti i psikhologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya personala ob"ektov spetsi- al'nogo naznacheniya [Topical Problems of Ergonomics, Habitability and Psychological Support for Special Purpose Personnel] (pp. 186-198). Korolev: PSTM.

36. Wathanakom, N., Khlaisang, J., & Songkram, N. (2020).The study of the causal relationship between innovativeness and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(9), 1-4. doi: 10.1186/s13731-020-00125-5

Размещено на Allbest.ru