Религиозный экстремизм как форма девиантного поведения: социально-философский анализ

21. Everton, S. (2016) Social Networks and Religious Violence. Review of Religious Research. 58 (2). pp. 191-217.

22. Santoprete, M. (2018) Global stability in a mathematical model of de-radicalization. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 509. pp. 151-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.027

23. Zare, M. (2016) Deviance as Inauthenticity: an Ontological Perspective. Philosophy of Management. 15 (2). pp. 151-159. DOI: 10.1007/s40926- 016-0034-x

24. Hornsey, M. (2016) Dissent and deviance in intergroup context. Current Opinion in Psychology. 11. pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.006

25. Khaustova, N.A. (2018) Ideological and psychological aspects of the study of religious extremism. Vestnik Polesskogo gosudarstvennogo univer- siteta. Ser. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. 1. pp. 47-50. (In Russian).

26. Leeuwen, N. (2014) Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition. 133 (3). pp. 698-715. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015

27. Harrington, N. (2013) Irrational Beliefs and Socio-Political Extremism. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 31 (3). pp. 167-178. DOI: 10.1007/s10942-013-0168-x

28. National Anti-Terrorism Committee. (2003) Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 fevralya 2003 g. № GKPI03-116 o priznanii terroristicheskimi organizatsiyami:... “Partiya islamskogo osvobozhdeniya” (“Khizb ut-Takhrir al'-Islami”)... i zaprete ikh deyatel'nosti [Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. GKPI 03-116 of February 14, 2003, on recognition of organizations as terrorist: < . . .> The Islamic Liberation Party (Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami) < . . .> and on the prohibition of their activities]. [Online] Available from:

http://nac.gov.ru/zakonodatelstvo/sudebnye-resheniya/reshenie-verhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-14-fevralya.html. (Accessed: 01.03.2019).

29. Cohen, R. (2013) The Evolution of Extremism. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan.

30. Michel, J. & Hargis, M. (2017) What motivates deviant behavior in the workplace? An examination of the mechanisms by which procedural injustice affects deviance. Motivation and Emotion. 41 (1). pp. 51-68.

31. Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. (c. 2019) Perechen ' nekommercheskikh organizatsiy, v otnoshenii kotorykh prinyato vstupivshee v

zakonnuyu silu reshenie o likvidatsii ili zaprete deyatel'nosti po osnovaniyam, predusmotrennym FZ “O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel'nosti” [The list of non-profit organizations in respect of which a decision has come into force on the liquidation or prohibition of activities on the grounds provided for by the Federal Law “On Countering Extremist Activities”]. [Online] Available from:

https://minjust.ru/ru/nko/perechen_zapret. (Accessed: 05.03.2019).

32. Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. (2008) Reshenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.04.2008 № GKPI08 -- o priznanii mezhdunarodnogo religioznogo ob ”edineniya “Nurdzhular ” ekstremistskim i zaprete ego deyatel 'nosti na territorii Rossii [Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. GKPI08 of April 10, 2008, on the recognition of the international religious association “Nurju- lar” as extremist and the prohibition of its activities in Russia]. [Online] Available from: http://genproc.gov.ru/special/smi/news/news-63034/. (Accessed: 01.03.2019).

33. Agnati, L. et al. (2017) The mis-exaptation of the prediction capability of humans and emergence of intolerant religious beliefs. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research. 23. pp. 43-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.npbr.2016.12.002

Аннотация

Религиозный экстремизм как форма девиантного поведения: социально-философский анализ. Т.В. Излученко, В.И. Кудашов

Обосновывается эффективность исследования религиозного экстремизма как формы негативного девиантного поведения, классифицируемой в качестве противоправной деятельности. Социально-философская интерпретация экстремизма как социокультурного и политического конструкта позволяет выявить принципы его формирования и механизмы функционирования. Анализируются общее и особенное религиозных групп и религиозных экстремистских организаций, социальных отклонений и проявлений экстремизма.

Ключевые слова: девиантность; девиантное поведение; религиозный экстремизм; радикализация; насильственный экстремизм; социальная девиация.

Abstract

Religious Extremism as a Form of Deviant Behavior: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis.Tatyana V. Izluchenko, Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)

Vyacheslav I. Kudashov, Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)

The article substantiates the effectiveness of the study of the religious extremism essence by deviantology approaches to the offenses and immoral acts study. The results can contribute to the optimization of countermeasures. The aim of the study is to consider religious extremism as a form of negative deviant behavior. The research methodology is based on the postmodern approach (Ya. Gilinsky, Yu. Komlev) of deviance as a social and cultural construct. The causes of extremism are considered within the framework of the functional approach, the cognitive and psychological prerequisites are conceived by the concepts of E. Smoleva and L. Agnati, and the determinism of extremism by social conditions by the concept of E. Yaroshevich. The analysis of the relationship of religious tradition and extremist manifestations is carried out on the basis of the ideas of M. Juergensmeyer and J. Beller. Extremism is a relative and conventional concept, expressing cultural, social and mental processes in a symbolic form; such processes are interpreted by society as causes of destructuration. Deviance is caused by cognitive systems' work, by mental states of people who are susceptible to certain ideas. Deviance is expressed in behavior that deviates from the prevailing social standards. The performed actions are perceived by society as a threat to their internal stability. Extremists' actions cause social tensions and lead to repressive measures of coercion by the state. This contributes to the radicalization of thinking, the group opposition to society and the external restriction of communication, which are intensified by the religious factor. The dichotomous position “We-They” acquires the extreme form “Friend-Foe”. “We” are sacralized, and “They” are demonized. The socially negative consequences of religious extremists' behavior are determined by the attitude of the social environment, the system of interactions and the personal qualities of charismatic leaders. Violent religious extremism is understood as the result of the radicalization of a closed group, the ideology of which includes apocalyptic sentiments and the conviction of their direct participation in the space struggle, the opposition of good and evil. By referring to the sacred, extremists use violence in the fight against chaos. Extremist ideology includes eschatological sentiments and conviction in direct participation in the “cosmic war” of Good and Evil, the purpose of which is to establish the world order and resolve sociopolitical and economic problems as soon as possible. Declarations of exclusivity, references to the sacred, the integration of followers and other organizational features are not unique to religious extremist organizations. They are peculiar to any religious associations. The status of an “extremist organization” is determined by the current laws, by the purpose of activities that are different from the religious tradition and have a political orientation, and by destructive consequences for society.

Keywords: deviance; deviant behavior; religious extremism; radicalization; violent extremism; social deviation.

Размещено на Allbest.ru