Socio-Cultural Factors Consistently Exposing Women to Intimate Partner Violence in Three Selected African Countries

The prevalence, forms and associated factors violence against women. The factors associated with protecting sub-Saharan African women from IPV beyond national boundaries in three former British West African Countries – the Gambia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone.

Рубрика Социология и обществознание
Вид дипломная работа
Язык английский
Дата добавления 07.09.2018
Размер файла 2,5 M

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

0.899

0.997

(0.664 - 4.453)

(0.880 - 14.63)

(0.851 - 1.389)

(1.024 - 1.894)

(0.590 - 1.371)

(0.609 - 1.634)

Observations

3517

3531

22305

22305

4315

4315

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

From the Table above, the (unadjusted) Odds ratios reveal that acceptance of IPV as justified for any reason is a consistent factor exposing women that can be associated with its actual experience across countries. In each countries, women who justify IPV for any reason were also more likely to have experienced IPV. This relationship is significant at p. value <0.05 in all countries. However, there are three possible objections to reaching an hasty conclusions here. First this study does not claim causality. Second, women might begin to justify IPV only after several experience of IPV (see the normalization theory in Okenwa-Emegwa, L., Lawoko, S., & Jansson, B. (2016). Finally, the table is a product of single binary logistic regression. Other factors need to be controlled for to ascertain the consistency in statistics. This is done and result is presented in the table below.

Table 4.6: Reporting adjusted Odds ratios (aORs).

Regression analysis result: Reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

Attitude towards IPV

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

Never justified

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

IPVAW somewhar justified

1.868**

3.559***

1.501***

1.377**

0.825

1.409

(1.255 - 2.781)

(1.900 - 6.664)

(1.286 - 1.753)

(1.127 - 1.682)

(0.526 - 1.294)

(0.894 - 2.221)

Yes IPVAW very justified

2.113**

3.556**

1.272**

1.461***

0.845

1.051

(1.317 - 3.388)

(1.626 - 7.773)

(1.076 - 1.502)

(1.191 - 1.791)

(0.548 - 1.303)

(0.668 - 1.654)

DK/Missing

8.951***

4.256

0.817

1.188

0.539

0.695

(2.909 - 27.54)

(0.433 - 41.82)

(0.543 - 1.230)

(0.752 - 1.874)

(0.288 - 1.008)

(0.276 - 1.750)

Constant

0.102***

0.0117***

0.0772***

0.0255***

0.219***

0.0817***

(0.0686 - 0.151)

(0.00556 - 0.0244)

(0.0663 - 0.0899)

(0.0201 - 0.0324)

(0.145 - 0.331)

(0.0456 - 0.146)

Observations

1,752

1,755

13,758

13,758

1,528

1,528

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

Table 4.6 further strengthens the relationship found between woman's justification of IPV and its actual experience, except in Sierra Leone where the relationship is not significant either in lifetime or in last 12 months prevalence.

Decision: Meanwhile acceptance of IPV as justified for any reason is positively associated with IPVAW and significant at 95% confidence interval in the Gambia and Nigeria, it is not consistently significant in Sierra Leone when other variables are controlled for only. Thus while I do not reject the hypothesis that women who accept that IPVAW could be justified for any reason are more likely to experience IPV, I do not accept that this relationship is consistent in all countries studied.

Hypothesis Two: Women whose father beat their mother will be more likely to experience IPV compared to their counterparts whose father did not beat their mother [Testing between Parental History of Violence and Woman's Actual IPV Experience]

violence women african protecting

Table 4.7: Association between parental violence history and IPV experience

Regression analysis result: Reporting logistic odds ratios of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

Parental violence (her father beat her mother)

GAMBIA

GAMBIA

NIGERIA

NIGERIA

SIERRA LEONE

SIERRA LEONE

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Yes

2.139***

2.848***

4.362***

3.712***

2.134***

2.123***

(1.483 - 3.085)

(1.824 - 4.447)

(3.828 - 4.971)

(3.180 - 4.334)

(1.753 - 2.597)

(1.719 - 2.621)

Don't know

1.235

1.790*

1.769***

1.481***

1.644***

1.458**

(0.867 - 1.761)

(1.091 - 2.934)

(1.504 - 2.081)

(1.209 - 1.813)

(1.304 - 2.072)

(1.120 - 1.898)

Observations

3517

3531

22305

22305

4315

4315

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

Table 4.8: Reporting adjusted Odds Ratios

Regression analysis result: Reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

Parental violence (her father beat her mother)

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Yes

1.920*

2.506**

1.000***

2.249***

2.381***

2.266***

(1.139 - 3.238)

(1.342 - 4.683)

(1.000 - 1.000)

(1.822 - 2.776)

(1.749 - 3.241)

(1.575 - 3.258)

Don't know

1.173

1.692

-----

1.241

2.435***

1.945**

(0.650 - 2.119)

(0.853 - 3.359)

-----

(0.935 - 1.647)

(1.579 - 3.757)

(1.237 - 3.058)

Constant

0.102***

0.0117***

0.0772***

0.0255***

0.219***

0.0817***

(0.0686 - 0.151)

(0.00556 - 0.0244)

(0.0663 - 0.0899)

(0.0201 - 0.0324)

(0.145 - 0.331)

(0.0456 - 0.146)

Observations

1,752

1,755

13,758

13,758

1,528

1,528

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

In both tables, Tables 4.7 and 4.8, women who had a parental history of violence in which the father beats her mother were also more likely to have experienced IPV from their own husband or partner in adulthood. This is consistent in all countries.

Tables 4.9 and Table 4.10 below reports findings for the last three hypotheses and discussions of findings are provided hereunder.

Hypothesis Three: Women who earn income less than their husband's are more likely to experience IPV than their counterparts who earn about same as, or more than husband. [Testing Between Relative Income and IPV Experience

This is only significant in Nigeria where women who earn more income than husbands were also more likely to suffer from IPV compared to their counterparts who earn less than husbands or partners.

Hypothesis Four: Women whose husband/partner manifest any form of control over her will manifest higher likelihood of experiencing IPV compared to women whose husband/partner does not…. [Testing Between Husband controlling behavior and Woman's Actual IPV Experience]

This is indeed another novel finding in this study, using the scale of counts to reflect the number of controls a husband/partner manifest. In Table 4.9, likelihood of suffering from IPV from husband increases significantly as the number of controls increases. In all women whose husband controls in any way were more likely to have experience IPV from him in both lifetime and 12 months prevalence.

In Table 4.10, it is interesting to note that the same relationship is persistent despite controlling for other potential covariates. Likelihood of suffering from IPV from husband increases for a women as the number of his control (dominance) increases. This relational factor corroborates the second level factor or IPVAW proposed by Heise (1998) Social ecological model. It also extends our knowledge in the application of the Marital Power theory expounded by Jewkes (2002) and McKenry et. al (1995). The higher the dominance of husbands, the more likely he is to perpetrate IPV against the woman in all countries.

Hypothesis Five: Women whose husband/partner drink alcohol will manifest higher likelihood of experiencing IPV compared to women whose husband/partner does not. [Testing Between Woman's IPV Experience and Husband's Alcohol Consumption Behavior].

With the exception of the Gambian women in the last 12 months preceding the survey, women whose husband drink alcohol were more likely to report suffering from IPV from him compared to women whose husband or partner does not drink alcohol.

Controlling for other variables in Table 2, all relationship turns significant except for Sierra Leone where alcohol does not show any significant relationship with IPVAW either in the lifetime or in the last 12 months.

In conclusion, two variables were found to be consistent in their relationship with IPVAW against women and remains consistent irrespective of how the factors are modeled. These are parental history of violence (if her father beat her mother), husband control (strongly significant and likelihood increases with the number of controls), and alcohol consumption.

Table 4.9: Association between Husband alcohol consumption, Husband Control and Relative Income

Regression analysis result: Reporting logistic odds ratios of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

Attitude towards IPV

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

Husband drinks alcohol

GAMNIA

GAMBIA

NIGERIA

NIGERIA

S. LEONE

S. LEONE

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Yes

3.348**

1.922

4.170***

3.880***

1.855***

1.830***

(1.552 - 7.223)

(0.822 - 4.490)

(3.722 - 4.671)

(3.403 - 4.423)

(1.379 - 2.495)

(1.463 - 2.289)

Husband controls (Nos.)

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

One control

3.917***

3.478***

1.898***

2.028***

2.334***

1.790**

(2.916 - 5.263)

(2.184 - 5.538)

(1.658 - 2.173)

(1.635 - 2.516)

(1.639 - 3.324)

(1.171 - 2.736)

Two controls

4.532***

5.031***

3.036***

3.033***

4.166***

2.955***

(3.149 - 6.522)

(2.819 - 8.979)

(2.619 - 3.520)

(2.463 - 3.734)

(3.144 - 5.520)

(2.137 - 4.086)

Three or more controls

8.562***

10.08***

11.75***

11.72***

6.367***

5.124***

(5.892 - 12.44)

(6.019 - 16.88)

(10.15 - 13.59)

(9.609 - 14.28)

(4.993 - 8.119)

(3.764 - 6.975)

Missing/DK/No response

4.929

15.88*

3.833***

5.171***

5.104***

2.727*

(0.926 - 26.24)

(1.875 - 134.5)

(2.968 - 4.951)

(3.742 - 7.147)

(2.187 - 11.91)

(1.035 - 7.186)

Relative income

Woman earns less

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Woman earns about same

0.536

0.197**

0.961

0.843

0.676

0.6

(0.198 - 1.454)

(0.0608 - 0.635)

(0.782 - 1.182)

(0.636 - 1.116)

(0.394 - 1.159)

(0.318 - 1.133)

Woman earns more

0.708

0.856

1.656***

1.761***

0.746

1.126

(0.323 - 1.552)

(0.328 - 2.237)

(1.277 - 2.146)

(1.299 - 2.389)

(0.428 - 1.298)

(0.600 - 2.112)

Husband has no income

0.731

0.265

2.338**

1.857*

0.874

0.397

(0.277 - 1.932)

(0.0330 - 2.131)

(1.397 - 3.913)

(1.132 - 3.048)

(0.277 - 2.759)

(0.141 - 1.117)

DK/Missing

1.009

0.573

1.397*

1.265

0.407*

0.386*

(0.425 - 2.394)

(0.186 - 1.769)

(1.080 - 1.808)

(0.880 - 1.820)

(0.201 - 0.826)

(0.171 - 0.873)

Observations

3517

3531

22305

22305

4315

4315

Obs. (relative income)

1528

1528

13758

13758

1528

1528

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

Table 4.10: Reporting Adjusted Odds Ratios

Regression analysis result: Reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

Attitude towards IPV

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

(aORs)

Husband drinks alcohol

GAMNIA

GAMBIA

NIGERIA

NIGERIA

S. LEONE

S. LEONE

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Yes

4.406**

5.371**

3.819***

3.294***

1.581

1.067

(1.659 - 11.70)

(1.645 - 17.54)

(3.337 - 4.372)

(2.780 - 3.903)

(0.962 - 2.598)

(0.677 - 1.681)

Husband controls (Nos.)

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

One control

2.886***

2.593**

2.343***

2.210***

2.916***

2.153*

(1.972 - 4.222)

(1.434 - 4.688)

(1.990 - 2.757)

(1.717 - 2.844)

(1.717 - 4.953)

(1.105 - 4.197)

Two controls

3.601***

3.691**

3.606***

3.022***

5.039***

4.102***

(2.202 - 5.889)

(1.625 - 8.385)

(3.050 - 4.264)

(2.358 - 3.874)

(3.191 - 7.957)

(2.328 - 7.225)

Three or more controls

6.996***

10.57***

11.05***

9.367***

8.257***

6.252***

(4.177 - 11.72)

(5.743 - 19.46)

(9.159 - 13.32)

(7.333 - 11.97)

(5.251 - 12.98)

(3.625 - 10.78)

Missing/DK/No response

3.934

10.83**

3.691***

4.372***

1.122

1.572

(0.677 - 22.85)

(1.848 - 63.51)

(2.554 - 5.334)

(2.825 - 6.765)

(0.211 - 5.965)

(0.251 - 9.829)

Relative income

Woman earns less

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Woman earns about same

0.554

0.202*

0.908

0.747

0.78

0.649

(0.201 - 1.531)

(0.0582 - 0.700)

(0.712 - 1.157)

(0.541 - 1.031)

(0.441 - 1.378)

(0.332 - 1.266)

Woman earns more

0.889

1.012

1.536**

1.455*

0.593

0.954

(0.501 - 1.579)

(0.495 - 2.070)

(1.126 - 2.095)

(1.031 - 2.052)

(0.324 - 1.086)

(0.529 - 1.721)

Husband has no income

0.616

0.195

1.801*

1.097

1.491

0.516

(0.220 - 1.722)

(0.0375 - 1.018)

(1.056 - 3.074)

(0.571 - 2.110)

(0.447 - 4.974)

(0.182 - 1.465)

DK/Missing

1.402

0.582

1.267

1.072

0.460*

0.485

(0.477 - 4.114)

(0.124 - 2.742)

(0.948 - 1.692)

(0.720 - 1.598)

(0.212 - 0.997)

(0.213 - 1.106)

Constant

0.102***

0.0117***

0.0772***

0.0255***

0.219***

0.0817***

(0.0686 - 0.151)

(0.00556 - 0.0244)

(0.0663 - 0.0899)

(0.0201 - 0.0324)

(0.145 - 0.331)

(0.0456 - 0.146)

Observations

1,752

1,755

13,758

13,758

1,528

1,528

Notes_Titles ciEform in parentheses; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary and Discussion of Findings

This paper investigates the common and specific factors of IPV against women in there African countries with the aim of discovering factors that are consistent in their relationship to IPV against women beyond national and cultural boundaries. It employed the Social ecological model of Heise (1998), the Social learning theory of Bandura (1971), the Biopsychosocial model of McKenry et. al (1995). Five hypotheses were tested with the aid of binary logistic regression at 95% confidence interval. The study found that women with childhood exposure to domestic violence (in which her father beat her mother), who agree that it might be justifiable for a man to beat his wife for any reason, women with a husband or partner who drinks alcohol, and more importantly women whose husband exercise any form of control over were more likely to experience IPV compared to their counterparts without such characteristics. Women who earn income more than husband were more likely to report experiencing IPV in Nigeria compared to those women who earn less income than husband

Thus this paper extends our knowledge on consistent factors of IPVAW. It could therefore be predicted that men who manifest any of the five hypothetical husband controlling behaviors will be more likely to perpetrate IPV against their female partners in all the three countries. Likewise, women whose father beat her mother also stands a higher risk than their counterparts whose father did not beat her mother. This corroborates the individual intergenerational factor of Heise (1998) and the Social leaning theory of Bandura (1971).

The findings in this study also further corroborate a number of other studies such as Uthman, Moradi & Lawoko (2011) who investigated the relationship between attitude towards IPVAW and actual experiences in Nigeria using the penultimate 2008 NDHS. They found a strong correlation between women's acceptance of IPV as justified and its actual occurrence. However, beyond this, while the current study partly justifies this, it further reveals that the relationship does not hold true in every country - it was not statistically significant in Sierra Leone (see Table 4).

This paper also further agrees with the findings of Uthman, Moradi & Lawoko (2011) in Nigeria which reports early exposure to IPV in childhood is a strong correlate of actual experience of IPV in adulthood. A position equally justified by Abramsky, et. al (2011). By showing that this relationship is consistent beyond countries, this study extend further strengthen such position and add to this already existing body of literature

Antai, D. (2011) and Garcia-Moreno, Jansen,, Ellsberg, Heise, & Watts, (2006) ha ve reported that women whose husband manifests controls over were more likely to experience IPV. However, beyond these, the current study reveals that in all countries studied, the likelihood of a woman experiencing IPVAW tend to increase proportionately in tandem to the number of controls reported. Women whose husband or partner manifests one or two controls are statistically less likely to experiencing IV frim him compared to women whose husband exhibit three or more forms of control. This finding is novel and

Recommendation

Based on the findings in this paper, the paper proposes the following recommendations:

There is need for community mobilization towards which should include men. The situation in Sierra Leone reveals that the presence of laws and policies is not enough if they are not well managed and effectively implemented.

The role of community leaders in the mobilization and campaigns against IPV and all forms of violence against women at the community levels is very crucial.

The education of women and girls should continue to be pushed forward. There are tendencies that educated women are less likely to justify IPVAW and thus would be less likely to condone it.

Education also offers opportunities for better bargaining power in households. Hence, women are less likely to be perceived as “liabilities” by husbands.

Men need to be reeducated that wife who us more materially and financially richer is not a “curse” and that women are necessarily wanting to become the household “lords” over them - a perceptions which is known to have stirred rivalry and jealousy from husbands and thus episodes of IPVAW.

Alcohol consumption should be discouraged. Men who hold history of perpetrating IPV under guise of alcohol should be held accountable.

It is important that parents lay good legacies for their children as children might tend to replicate or condone what they have seen with parents.

Finally, onerous tasks lies on the head of the government, NGOs and other stakeholders in Africa to mitigate instances of intimate partner violence against women in all its shadows and manifestations in African societies.

Limitation of Study

The use of secondary quantitative data limits the extent to which issues of domestic violence can be interpreted. The use of mixed methods could have provided better results with explanatory power and testing or disproving of theories. Likewise, the study fitted one stage binary logistic regression model. This makes it difficult to decongest each variable and report the effect of difference in slopes of regression as a result of differences in intercept due to regional and residential variations. This could have been controlled for by multilevel logistic regression models. Notwithstanding, the paper provides useful information and extends our understating of the factors consistent in their relationship to IPVAW in the Gambia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone. There is need therefore for more in-depth studies employing qualitative ethnographic methods as well as longitudinal in approach in order to fully capture the possible causes of IPVAW in households. Further systematic studies are also needed to teste the statistically justifiability or refutability of Heise (1998) five levels across and being national and national boundaries.

References

1. Abramsky, T., Watts, C. H., Garcia-Moreno, C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M. & Heise, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC public health, 11(1), 109. Retrieved this 1st May, 2018 from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-11-109

2. African Union (2018). Protocol to the African charter on human and peoples' rights on the rights of women in Africa. Retrieved this April 30, 2018 from http://www.achpr.org/instruments/women-protocol/.

3. Antai, D. (2011). Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria. BMC public health, 11(1), 511.

4. Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1137-1148.

5. Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61(1), 40. Retrieved this May 9, 2018 from http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1993-25891-001.html

6. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. Handbook of socialization theory and research, 213, 262. Retrieved this 7th of May, 2017 from http://www.jku.at/org/content/e54521/e54528/e54529/e178059/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory_ger.pdf

7. Blumberg, R. L., & Coleman, M. T. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of family issues, 10(2), 225-250. Retrieved this May 9, 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019251389010002005

8. Bowman, Cynthia Grant (2003)"Theories of Domestic Violence in the African Context" (2003). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 131. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/131

9. Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The lancet, 359(9314), 1331-1336.

10. Campbell, J., Jones, A. S., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Schollenberger, J., O'campo, P,. & Wynne, C. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of internal medicine, 162(10), 1157-1163.

11. Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American journal of preventive medicine, 23(4), 260-268.

12. Demographic and Health Survey (n.d.). Domestic Violence Module. Recommendations and Questions. Accessed this May 19th 2018 from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/DHSQMP/domestic_violence_module.pdf.pdf

13. Devries, K. M., Kishor, S., Johnson, H., Stцckl, H., Bacchus, L. J., Garcia-Moreno, C., & Watts, C. (2010). Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: analysis of prevalence data from 19 countries. Reproductive health matters, 18(36), 158-170. Retrieved this 30th April, 2018 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968808010365335

14. Devries, K. M., Kishor, S., Johnson, H., Stцckl, H., Bacchus, L. J., Garcia-Moreno, C., & Watts, C. (2010). Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: analysis of prevalence data from 19 countries. Reproductive health matters, 18(36), 158-170. Retrieved May 5th, 2018 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968808010365335

15. Deyessa, N., Berhane, Y., Ellsberg, M., Emmelin, M., Kullgren, G., & Hцgberg, U. (2010). Violence against women in relation to literacy and area of residence in Ethiopia. Global Health Action, 3(1), 2070. Retrieved this 7th May, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2830802/

16. Dunkle, K. L., Jewkes, R. K., Brown, H. C., Gray, G. E., McIntryre, J. A., & Harlow, S. D. (2004). Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The lancet, 363(9419), 1415-1421.

17. Durkheim, E. (2013). Durkheim: The rules of sociological method: And selected texts on sociology and its method. Palgrave Macmillan. See http://varenne.tc.columbia.edu/bib/texts/durkheim_rules_chap5.html

18. Dutton, M. A., Green, B. L., Kaltman, S. I., Roesch, D. M., Zeffiro, T. A., & Krause, E. D. (2006). Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes. Journal of interpersonal violence, 21(7), 955-968.

19. Edwards, K. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence and the rural-urban-suburban divide: Myth or reality? A critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 359-373. Accessed this May 7th at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1524838014557289

20. Egbejule, E. (2017). 'No more beatings': Sierra Leone's husband schools take on domestic violence. Thomson Reuters Foundation. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-leone-women-abuse/no-more-beatings-sierra-leones-husband-schools-take-on-domestic-violence-idUSKBN1CE08X

21. Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H. A., Heise, L., Watts, C. H., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. The Lancet, 371(9619), 1165-1172.

22. Fanuel Otieno, Beauclair & Delva (2016). Intimate partner violence and age disparity in Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA). Accessed at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308396946_Intimate_partner_violence_and_age_disparity_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa

23. Felson, R. B. (2002). Law and public policy. Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10470-000. Retrieved this May 9, 2018 from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-17282-000

24. Flanagan, J. C., Gordon, K. C., Moore, T. M., & Stuart, G. L. (2015). Women's stress, depression, and relationship adjustment profiles as they relate to intimate partner violence and mental health during pregnancy and postpartum. Psychology of violence, 5(1), 66. Retrieved this 30th April, 2018 from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-32428-001

25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2018). Gambia at a glance. FAO in Gambia. Accessed this 18th May, 2018 from http://www.fao.org/gambia/fao-in-gambia/gambia-at-a-glance/en/

26. Foster 1999; The Integrated Regional Network [IRIN], Johannesburg, South Africa, May 25, 2002)

27. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. The lancet, 368(9543), 1260-1269.

28. George, E., & Engel, L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American journal of Psychiatry, 137, 535-544. Accessed this May 4th, 2018 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.5626&rep=rep1&type=pdf

29. Gracia, E., & Merlo, J. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27-30. Assessed this 30th April, 2018 at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361630140Xhttp://bit.ly/2sJZM6B

30. Hekman, S. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2), 341-365.

31. Heywood, L., & Drake, J. (Eds.). (1997). Third wave agenda: Being feminist, doing feminism. U of Minnesota Press.Idoko, P., Ogbe, E., Jallow, O., & Ocheke, A. (2015). Burden of intimate partner violence in The Gambia-a cross sectional study of pregnant women. Reproductive health, 12(1), 34. Retrieved this 1st May, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405825/

32. Hindin, M. J. (2003). Understanding women's attitudes towards wife beating in Zimbabwe. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 501-508.

33. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Ghana Statistical Services (GSS) and Associates (2016), Domestic Violence in Ghana: Incidence, Attitudes, Determinants and Consequences, Brighton: IDS. Retrieved this May 1, 2018 from http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/publications/DV_Ghana_Report_FINAL.pdf

34. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2013). Global unemployment rising again - What about Africa? ILO Press Release, Regional Office for Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Tuesday, 22 January 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---africa/---ro-addis_ababa/documents/pressrelease/wcms_202807.pdf

35. International Religious Freedom Report (2016). The Gambia 2016 International Religious Freedom Report: Executive Summary. United States Department of State * Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/268896.pdf

36. Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. The lancet, 359(9315), 1423-1429. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673602083575

37. Jewkes, R. K., Dunkle, K., Nduna, M., & Shai, N. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study. The lancet, 376(9734), 41-48.

38. Jewkes, R., Levin, J., & Penn-Kekana, L. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social science & medicine, 55(9), 1603-1617. Retrieved this 4th December, 2017 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953601002945

39. Joyner, K., Rees, K., & Honikman, S. (2015). Intimate partner violence (IPV) in South Africa: How to break the vicious cycle. Retrieved this 1st May, 2018 from file:///C:/Users/hp/Desktop/NEW%20LITERATURES/IPV%20in%20South%20Africa%20Policy%20Brief.pdf

40. Joyner, K., Rees, K., & Honikman, S. (2015). Intimate partner violence (IPV) in South Africa: How to break the vicious cycle. Centre for Public Mental Health. Policy Brief. November, 2015. Retrieved this May 3rd from http://www.sun.ac.za/english/faculty/healthsciences/Documents/News/2016/IPV_policybrief%2012%2001%2015%20final.pdf

41. Kwagala, B., Wandera, S. O., Ndugga, P., & Kabagenyi, A. (2013). Empowerment, partner's behaviours and intimate partner physical violence among married women in Uganda. BMC public health, 13(1), 1112. Retrieved this 16th December, 2017 from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1112

42. Larsen, M. M. (2016). Health Inequities Related to Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: The Role of Social Policy in the United States, Germany, and Norway. Springer. Retrieved this May 10, 2018 from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-29565-7

43. Lawoko, S. (2006). Factors associated with attitudes toward intimate partner violence: a study of women in Zambia. Violence and victims, 21(5), 645.

44. Lewis, D. A. (2009). Unrecognized victims: Sexual violence against men in conflict settings under international law. Wis. Int'l LJ, 27, 1. Retrieved this May 9 2018 from https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9823975/Lewis_2009_UnrecognizedVictims.pdfLiang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help?seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American journal of community psychology, 36(1-2), 71-84. Retrieved this May 7th 2018 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6

45. McKenry, P. C., Julian, T. W., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1995). Toward a biopsychosocial model of domestic violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 307-320. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b4cb/db5ec2c4c2ee66de4d573262652caf3af9a3.pdf

46. Mannell, J., & Jackson, S. (2014). Intimate partner violence in Rwanda: Women's voices. Community and Development Group London School of Economics.

47. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. 2014. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International. Retrieved this April 30, 2018 from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr293/fr293.pdf

48. Okenwa-Emegwa, L., Lawoko, S., & Jansson, B. (2016). Attitudes Toward Physical Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Nigeria. SAGE Open, 6(4), 2158244016667993. Retrieved this 5th May, 2017 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244016667993

49. Ola, B. E. (2017). Challenges in the Transformation of Women Potentials in Sub-Saharan African Region: Insight from the Plights of Women Suffering From Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Nigeria. International Scientific and Practical Conference: Transformation of Human Potential in the Context. Centuries, the Nizhny Novgorod, on September 14-15, 2017.

50. Ola, Bamidele Emmanuel (2017). “Interregional Comparison of Selected Demographic and Socio-Economic Dimensions of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Nigeria (Using 2013 NDHS)”. Population, Public Health and Development Conference, Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia 21-22 April, 2017.

51. Osei-Tutu, Ellen Mabel and Ampadu, Ernest (2017). Domestic Violence against Women in Ghana: The Attitudes of Men toward Wife-Beating. Journal of International Women's Studies, 18(4), 106-116. Accessible at http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol18/iss4/8

52. Oyediran, K. A. (2016). Explaining trends and patterns in attitudes towards wife-beating among women in Nigeria: analysis of 2003, 2008, and 2013 Demographic and Health Survey data. Genus, 72(1), 11. Retrieved this April 30, 2018 from https://genus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41118-016-0016-9

53. Pierotti, R. S. (2013). Increasing rejection of intimate partner violence: Evidence of global cultural diffusion. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 240-265. Retrieved this 1st May 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0003122413480363

54. Ruiz-Pйrez, I., Plazaola-Castaсo, J., & del Rнo-Lozano, M. (2007). Physical health consequences of intimate partner violence in Spanish women. European Journal of Public Health, 17(5), 437-443. Accessed this 30th of April, 2018 from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/17/5/437/537306

55. Semahegn, A., & Mengistie, B. (2015). Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; systematic review. Reproductive health, 12(1), 78. Accessed this 1st of May from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553009/

56. Statistics Sierra Leone (SSL) and ICF International. 2014. Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Freetown, Sierra Leone and Rockville, Maryland, USA: SSL and ICF International. Retrieved this April 30, 2018 from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr297/fr297.pdf

57. The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBOS) and ICF International (2014). The Gambia Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Banjul, The Gambia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: GBOS and ICF International. Retrieved this April 30, 2018 from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR289/FR289.pdf

58. The Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBOS) and ICF International (2014). The Gambia Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Banjul, The Gambia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: GBOS and ICF International.

59. Tjade, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. In Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. NIJ.

60. Touray, I. (2006). Sexuality and women's sexual rights in The Gambia. IDS bulletin, 37(5), 77-83. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00306.x.

61. Tranchant, J. P., & Mueller, C. (2017). Gendered Experience of Interpersonal Violence in Urban and Rural Spaces: The Case of Ghana. University Library of Munich, Germany. Retrieved this May 7th 2018 from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79533/1/MPRA_paper_79533.pdf

62. UNFPA (2009). Widespread violence against women in Africa documented Archived December 28, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.

63. Uthman O. A, Moradi T, Lawoko, S. (2011). Are Individual and Community Acceptance and Witnessing of Intimate Partner Violence Related to Its Occurrence? Multilevel Structural Equation Model. PLoS ONE 6(12): e27738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027738

64. Uthman, O. A., Lawoko, S., & Moradi, T. (2009). Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries. BMC international health and human rights, 9(1), 14. Retrieved this 1st May 2018 from https://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-698X-9-14

65. Uthman, O. A., Moradi, T., & Lawoko, S. (2009). The independent contribution of individual-, neighbourhood-, and country-level socioeconomic position on attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel model of direct and moderating effects. Social Science & Medicine, 68(10), 1801-1809.

66. Vives-Cases, C., Ruiz-Cantero, M. T., Escribа-Agьir, V., & Miralles, J. J. (2010). The effect of intimate partner violence and other forms of violence against women on health. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 15-21.

67. Woolf, N. Q. (2014). "Our attitude to violence against men is out of date". The Telegraph. Retrieved this May 8th, 2018 from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10752232/Our-attitude-to-violence-against-men-is-out-of-date.html

68. World Health Organization (2011). Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy. Information Sheet. Retrieved this 30th April, 2018 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70764/WHO_RHR_11.35_eng.pdf?sequence=1

69. World Health Organization [WHO] (2014). East African experts deliberate on gender based violence. Retrieved this May 1st 2018 from http://www.afro.who.int/news/east-african-experts-deliberate-gender-based-violence

70. World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. Retrieved this 19th April, 2017 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77432/1/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf

71. World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence

72. World Health Organization/London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (2012). Preventing Intimate Partner And Sexual Violence Against Women: Taking Action And Generating Evidence. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization

73. Yoshikawa, K., Shakya, T. M., Poudel, K. C., & Jimba, M. (2014). Acceptance of Wife Beating and Its Association with Physical Violence towards Women in Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Couple's Data. PloS one, 9(4), e95829.

Media websites

74. Vines, A. C. (2016). The Gambia: Africa's new Islamic republic. BBC News. 22 January, 2016. Accessed here: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-35359593

APPENDIX 1 - 4

Gender Empowerment Facts in Sierra Leone

Regression analysis result: Reporting logistic odds ratios of factors exposing women to IPV across three African countries

DEPENDENT VAR.==>

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

EVER IPV

12 Months IPV

Attitude towards IPV

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

(ORs)

Never justified

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

IPVAW somewhat justified

1.630**

2.990***

1.684***

1.703***

1.439**

1.670***

(1.220 - 2.179)

(1.854 - 4.824)

(1.483 - 1.912)

(1.462 - 1.983)

(1.126 - 1.839)

(1.288 - 2.166)

Yes IPVAW very justified

1.348

2.602**

1.688***

1.845***

1.103

1.315*

(0.948 - 1.916)

(1.432 - 4.730)

(1.473 - 1.934)

(1.586 - 2.146)

(0.886 - 1.373)

(1.030 - 1.681)

DK/Missing

1.719

3.589

1.087

1.393*

0.899

0.997

(0.664 - 4.453)

(0.880 - 14.63)

(0.851 - 1.389)

(1.024 - 1.894)

(0.590 - 1.371)

(0.609 - 1.634)

Parental violence (her father beat her mother)

No

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

( - )

Yes

2.139***

2.848***

4.362***

3.712***

2.134***

2.123***

(1.483 - 3.085)

(1.824 - 4.447)

(3.828 - 4.971)


Подобные документы

  • Global Feminist Revolution. Women’s Emancipation Movement. Feminism in International Relations and Discrimination. Gender discrimination. Women in the History of International Relations. Women Officials in the contemporary International Relations.

    реферат [22,6 K], добавлен 21.11.2012

  • Race discriminations on ethnicity backgrounds. The Globalization and Racism in Media Age. African American writers about racism. Comparative analysis of the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" Harper Lee and story "Going to Meet The Man" by James Baldwin.

    дипломная работа [135,9 K], добавлен 29.03.2012

  • The concept and sex, and especially his studies in psychology and sociology at the present stage. The history of the study of the concepts of masculinity and femininity. Gender issues in Russian society. Gender identity and the role of women in America.

    дипломная работа [73,0 K], добавлен 11.11.2013

  • Description situation of the drugs in the world. Factors and tendencies of development of drugs business. Analysis kinds of drugs, their stages of manufacture and territory of sale. Interrelation of drugs business with other global problems of mankind.

    курсовая работа [38,9 K], добавлен 13.09.2010

  • The nature and content of the concept of "migration". The main causes and consequences of migration processes in the modern world. Countries to which most people are emigrating from around the world. TThe conditions for obtaining the status of "migrant".

    презентация [4,8 M], добавлен 22.03.2015

  • The study of human populations. Demographic prognoses. The contemplation about future social developments. The population increase. Life expectancy. The international migration. The return migration of highly skilled workers to their home countries.

    реферат [20,6 K], добавлен 24.07.2014

  • Understanding of social stratification and social inequality. Scientific conceptions of stratification of the society. An aggregated socio-economic status. Stratification and types of stratification profile. Social stratification of modern society.

    реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 05.01.2009

  • The themes, analysis and solutions raised by feminists with reference to Australian work, and outline a Marxist analysis of violence against women. The importance of violence against women as a political issue. The emergence of women as sexual beings.

    реферат [91,4 K], добавлен 20.06.2010

  • The situation of women affected by armed conflict and political violence. The complexity of the human rights in them. Influence of gender element in the destruction of the family and society as a result of hostilities. Analysis of the Rwandan Genocide.

    реферат [10,9 K], добавлен 03.09.2015

  • Women and work: type of employment, labor for pregnant women in modern days. Reasons for oppression. Laws that helped women. Feminist model of female education. University of Texas compared to Cambridge. Women's health in the Victorian period and today.

    курсовая работа [43,1 K], добавлен 15.08.2013

  • The Commission on the Status of Women. World Summit on Sustainable Development. Problems of Education for Women. Education’s Effects on Reproductive Choice. The interaction between the region’s economic structure and its conservative culture in the USA.

    реферат [26,4 K], добавлен 16.12.2011

  • The first women’s liberation leaflet in Australia at a demonstration against the Vietnam war. The dress sense and appearance of the women. Struggle as a central movement that can unite women and men in the fight against sexism all over the world.

    реферат [71,8 K], добавлен 20.06.2010

  • Palm oil is a form of edible vegetable oil obtained from the fruit of the oil palm tree. Chemistry and processing. Environmental, social and cultural impact. Biofuels and bioproducts. Regional production. Health. Blood cholesterol controversy.

    реферат [23,8 K], добавлен 12.05.2008

  • Study of lexical and morphological differences of the women’s and men’s language; grammatical forms of verbs according to the sex of the speaker. Peculiarities of women’s and men’s language and the linguistic behavior of men and women across languages.

    дипломная работа [73,0 K], добавлен 28.01.2014

  • History of the approval status of women from ancient times to the Middle Ages. Legislative regulation of the rights and obligations of women in the nineteenth century in England. A brief description of the life the most famous of the fairer sex.

    реферат [34,1 K], добавлен 14.09.2011

  • Kazakh national clothes as the best that could create art and talent of craftsmen for centuries. Women's traditional clothes. Hats for women Male Kazakh costume. Kalpak, takyya, borik - men's hats. Tymak - most original headdress for in the winter.

    презентация [662,6 K], добавлен 11.03.2014

  • The theory and practice of Marxism as it relates to women’s liberation. In response to feminist criticism, many Marxists have been unnecessarily defensive. Marxism, feminism and the struggle for reform. The real Marxist tradition. The Russian Revolution.

    эссе [116,2 K], добавлен 23.06.2010

  • Different nations negotiate with different styles. Those styles are shaped by the nation’s culture, political system and place in the world. African Approaches to Negotiation. Japanese, European, Latin American, German and British styles of Negotiation.

    презентация [261,2 K], добавлен 27.10.2010

  • Thematic review of the characteristics of each factor of production. The theories of main economists. The possible variants of new factors of production. Labor resources. "Elementary factors of the labour-process" or "productive forces" of Marx.

    реферат [437,4 K], добавлен 18.10.2014

  • Hopewell Culture was applying to Sri Lanka. Discussions on the topic of gender issues in underdeveloped countries. The education of women in third world countries. The Hopewell are the “next generation” of the Adena. The Hopewell Interaction Sphere.

    реферат [26,9 K], добавлен 08.03.2010

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.