Цифровизация современного пространства общественно-политических коммуникаций: научные концепции, модели и сценарии

2. Safronov, A.P. (2018) Industrial'nyy avtoritarizm: poryadok sotsial'nogo prinuzhdeniya [Industrial authoritarianism: an order of social coercion]. Moscow: Algoritm.

3. Hanna, N. (2018) A role for the state in the digital age. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 7. pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-018-0086-3

4. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N. & Haug, N. (2019) Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 36(4). DOI: 10.1016/j .giq.2019.06.002

5. Smorgunov, V.L. (2019) Participatory governability: platforms and collaboration. Vlast'- The Authority. 27(5). pp. 9-19. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i5.6712

6. Srnichek, N. (2020) Kapitalizm platform [Platform Capitalism]. Translated from English by M. Dobryakova. 2nd ed. Moscow: HSE.

7. Castells, M. (2011) A Network Theory of Power. International Journal of Communication. 5. pp. 773-787.

8. Akopov, G.L. (2014) Internet i politika. Modernizatsiya politicheskoy sistemy na osnovanii innovatsionnykh politicheskikh internet-kommunikatsiy [Internet and politics. Modernization of the political system based on innovative political Internet communications]. Moscow: KNORUS.

9. Dommett, K., Kefford, G. & Power, S. (2020) The digital ecosystem: the new politics of party

organization in parliamentary democracies. Party Politics. February. pp. 1-11.

10. Gerbaudo, P. (2018) The Digital Party: Political Organization and Online Democracy (Digital Barricades). London: Pluto Press.

11. Manovich, L. (2018) Yazyk novykh media [The Language of New Media]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press.

12. Rodkin, P.E. (2016) Media i sotsium. Tri popytki vskryt' sub"ekt vlasti: kriticheskiy ocherk [Media and Society. Three Attempts to Uncover the Subject of Power: A Critical Essay]. Moscow: Sovpadenie.

13. Koehler, G. (2013) The new social media: chance or challenge for dialogue? Polis. Politi- cheskie issledovaniya - Polis. Political Studies. 4. pp. 75-87. (In Russian).

14. Bodrunova, S.S. (2020) Contributive action: socially mediated activities of Russians during the COVID-19 lockdown. Media International Australia. 177(1). pp. 139-143. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X20953536

15. Dean, J. (2014) Communicative Capitalism and Class Struggle. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures. 1. pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.25969/mediarep/3818

16. Meyer, T. (2001) Mediokratie: Die Kolonisierung der Politik durch die Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

17. Soloviev, A.I. (2004) Politicheskiy diskurs mediakratiy: problemy informatsionnoy epokhi [Political discourse of media practices: problems of the information age]. Polis. Politicheskie issledo- vaniya - Polis. Political Studies. 2. pp. 124-132. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.12

18. Beer, D. (2017) The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society. 20(1). pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147

19. Lovink, G. (2019) Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta [Critical Theory of the Internet]. Translated from English by P. Torkanovsky, D. Lebedev. Moscow: Ad Marginem, Muzey sovr. isk. “Garazh”.

20. Coleman, S. (2018) Mozhet li Internet ukrepit' demokratiyu? [Can the Internet Strengthen Democracy?]. Translated from English by Yu.A. Kabanov, Yu.G. Misnikov, A.N. Ryabushko. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya.

21. Himanen, P. (2019) Khakerskaya etika i dukh informatsionalizma [The Hacker Ethics and the Spirit of Information Age]. Translated from English by D. Sirochenko. Moscow: AST.

22. Savaget, P., Chiarini, T. & Evans, S. (2019) Empowering Political Participation through Artificial Intelligence. Science and Public Policy. 46(3). pp. 369-380. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy064

23. Barbruk, R. (2015) Internet-revolyutsiya [The Internet Revolution]. Translated from English. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press.

24. Bagdasaryan, V.E. & Baldin, P.P. (2020) Perspektivy razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta v aktual'noy povestke politicheskikh i sotsial'nykh riskov global'nykh transformatsiy [Prospects for the development of artificial intelligence in the current agenda of political and social risks of global transformations]. Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy - Journal of Political Research. 4(2). pp. 10-22. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2020-10-22

25. Witt, M.T. & Haven-Smith, L. de (2008) Conjuring the Holographic State: Scripting Security Doctrine for a (New) World of Disorder. Administration & Society. 40(6). pp. 547-585. DOI: 10.1177/0095399708321682

26. Barber, B.R. (1998) Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy. Political Science Quarterly. 113(4). pp. 573-589. DOI: 10.2307/2658245

27. McQuire, S. (2018) Geomedia: setevye goroda i budushchee obshchestvennogo prostranstva [Geomedia: Networked Cities and the Future of Public Space]. Translated from English. Moscow: Strelka Press.

28. Miroshnichenko, I.V. (2016) Setevaya publichnaya politika i upravlenie [Network public policy and management]. Moscow: Argamak-Media.

29. Shomova, S.A. (2016) Ot misterii do strit-arta. Ocherki ob arkhetipakh kul'tury vpolitiche- skoy kommunikatsii [From mystery to street art. Essays on the archetypes of culture in political communication]. Moscow: HSE.

30. Jeffares, St. (2014) Interpreting Hashtag Politics. Policy Ideas in an Era of Social Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

31. Volodenkov, S.V. & Fedorchenko, S.N. (2018) Tsifrovye stigmaty kak instrument mani- pulyatsii massovym soznaniem v usloviyakh sovremennogo gosudarstva i obshchestva [Digital stigmata as a tool for manipulating mass consciousness in a modern state and society]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya - Sociological Studies. 11. pp. 117-123. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002791-3

32. Clark, W.R. & Golder, M. (2015) Big Data, Causal Inference, and Formal Theory: Contradictory Trends in Political Science? PS: Political Science & Politics. 48(1). pp. 65-70. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096514001759

33. Rogowsky, E. (2017) The U.S. Presidential Election: A Triumph of Information Technology Innovations. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn' - International Affairs. 3. pp. 107-122. (In Russian).

34. Bykov, I.A. (2020) Iskusstvennyy intellekt kak istochnik politicheskikh suzhdeniy [Artificial Intelligence as a Source of Political Judgments]. Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy - Journal of Political Research. 4(2). pp. 23-33. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2020-23-33

35. Vasilkova, V.V. & Legostaeva, N.I. (2019) Social bots in political communication. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya - RUDN Journal of Sociology. 19(1). pp. 121-133. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-121-133

36. Ostapenko, A.G., Parinov, A.V., Kalashnikov, A.O. et al. (2020) Sotsial'nye seti i destruktiv- nyy kontent [Social networks and destructive content]. Moscow: Goryach. liniya - Telekom.

37. Keane, J. (2015) Demokratiya i dekadans media [Democracy and Media Decadence]. Translated from English by D. Kralechkin. Moscow: HSE.

38. Kuehn, K.M. & Salter, L.A. (2020) Assessing Digital Threats to Democracy, and Workable Solutions: A Review of the Recent Literature. International Journal of Communication. 14. pp. 25892610.

39. Sadowski, J. & Pasquale, F. (2015) The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. First Monday. 20(7). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v20i7.5903

40. Emelin, V.A. (2017) Identichnost' v informatsionnom obshchestve [Identity in the Information Society]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”.

41. Tishchenko, P.D. (2014) Rossiya 2045: kotlovan dlya avatara (Razmyshleniya v svyazi s knigoy “Global'noe budushchee 2045. Konvergentnye tekhnologii (NBIKS) i transgumanisticheskaya evolyutsiya”) [Russia 2045: a pit for an avatar (Reflections in connection with the book “The global future 2045. Convergent technologies (NBICS) and transhumanistic evolution”)]. Voprosy filosofii. 8. pp. 181-187.

42. Tomiltseva, D.A. & Zheleznov, A.S. (2020) Inevitable Third: Ethical and Political Aspects of Interactions with Artificial Agents. Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz (Zhurnalpoliticheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki) - Politeia. The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics. 4(99). pp. 90-107. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-99-4-90-107

43. Dean, J. (2019) Kommunizm ili neofeodalizm? [Communism or neo-feudalism?]. Logos. 29(6). pp. 85-116.

44. Efremov, A.A. (2017) Formirovanie kontseptsii informatsionnogo suvereniteta gosudarstva [Formation of the state information sovereignty concept]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 1. pp. 201-215. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215

45. Nechaev, V.D. & Belokonev, S.Yu. (2020) Digital Economy and Trends of Political Development in Modern Societies. Kontury global'nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo - Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 13(2). pp. 112-133. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-6

46. Pocheptsov, G.G. (2015) Informatsionnye voyny. Novyy instrument politiki [Information Wars. New Policy Tool]. Moscow: Algoritm.

47. Boyd-Barrett, O. (2018) Media-imperializm [Media Imperialism]. Translated from English. Kharkiv: Gumanitarnyy tsentr.

48. Innis, H.A. (2007) Empire & Communications. Toronto: Dundurn Press.

49. Bykov, A.Yu. (2008) Informatsionnaya sushchnost' geopolitiki [Informational essence of geopolitics]. Kosmopolis. 3(22). pp. 24-31.

50. Ignatiev, V.I. (2020) Sotsial'nye lokal'nosti v epokhu informatsionno-setevoy glokalizatsii [Social locality in the era of information-network glocalization]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya - Sociological Studies. 7. pp. 37-46. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010024-9

51. Vinnik, D.V. (2014) Digital sovereignty: political and legal regimes of data filtration. Filoso- fiya nauki - Philosophy of Sciences. 2(61). pp. 95-113. (In Russian).

52. Zhukov, D.S. (2020) Iskusstvennyy intellekt dlya obshchestvenno-gosudarstvennogo or- ganizma: budushchee uzhe startovalo v Kitae [Artificial intelligence for the public-state organism: the future has already started in China]. Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy - Journal of Political Research. 4(2). pp. 70-79. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2020-70-79

53. Bazhanova, S.V. & Syryamina, N.A. (2019) Independence of information resources as an element of information security of the state. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tati-shcheva. 2(3). pp. 5-12. (In Russian).

54. Kefeli, I.F. & Malmberg, S.A. (2019) State Information Capacity as Information Sovereignty Basis. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie - Administrative Consulting. 1(121). pp. 29-39. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-1-29-39

55. Bukharin, V.V. (2016) The Russian's digital sovereignty as a technical basis of information security. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta - MGIMO Review of International Relations. 6(51). pp. 76-91. (In Russian).

56. Osipov, V.S. (2020) Yellow brick road to digital state. Digital Law Journal. 1(2). pp. 28-40. DOI: 10.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-2-28-40

57. Srnichek, N. & Williams, A. (2019) Izobretaya budushchee: postkapitalizm i mir bez truda [Inventing the Future: Post-Capitalism and a World Without Labor]. Translated from English. Moscow: Strelka Press.

58. Floridi, L. (2020) The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology. 33. pp. 369-378. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6

59. Kar, R. & Haldar, R. (2016) Applying Chatbots to the Internet of Things: Opportunities and Architectural Elements. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 7(11). pp. 147-154. DOI: 10.14569/UACSA.2016.071119

60. Fryer, L.K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R. & Lдpusneanu, D. (2020) Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology. 24(2). pp. 8-22.

61. Albrecht, K. (2009) Social Intelligence: The New Science of Success. New York: Pfeiffer.

62. Gratch, J., Okhmatovskai, A., Lamothe, F., Marsella, S., Morales, M., van der Werf, R.J. & Morency, L.P. (2006) Virtual rapport. Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 14-27. DOI: 10.1007/11821830_2

Размещено на allbest.ru